Assignment Prompt & Instructions
[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)
– 2 years ago
**files (19)**
– ## PHL337TEXTBOOKINFO.docx
– ## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## finalprojectpartIVINSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## BOOKINFO.docx
– ## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## finalprojectpartIINSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## finalprojectpartIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PAD400Rubric6-1.pdf
– ## finalprojectpartIIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PHL337SubmissionlinkCEDPARTIINSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– ## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx
– SubmissionLinkCEDPARTIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx
– PHL337WRITINGPARTIRUBRIC.pdf
– PARTIIRUBRIC.pdf
**## PHL337TEXTBOOKINFO.docx**
· Moral of the Story: An Introduction to Ethics, 9th Edition
By: Rosenstand, Nina
ISBN: 978-1-259-23119-3
**## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Four: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast substantive and procedural due process, especially as they apply to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week One: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast the political approach to public administration and the legal approach to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Two: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Discuss the problems and the advantages of the judicial approach to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIVINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 4
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Paper: Part 4**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>· Final version of your completed project uploaded into the course.<br>· Include a short reflection on your efforts and what you learned.<br>· This project should<br>· reveal your interest in and engagement with the issue or topic, and<br>· showcase your ability to produce scholarly and creative output. |
Bottom of Form
**## BOOKINFO.docx**
· Public Administration: An Introduction, 3rd Edition
By: Holzer, Marc / Schwester, Richard W.
ISBN: 978-1-138-57966-8
**## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Three: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast how the four main approaches to public administration (traditional managerial, new managerial, political, and judicial) address analyzing the success of administrative policies and regulation.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Three: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Identify a proposed regulation from a federal agency that you are interested in. It will be published in the Federal Register. Understand the purposes behind the regulation and identify who is likely to oppose it and who is likely to support the regulation.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Project: Part 1**<br>**Deliverable: Written Project Proposal or Plan**<br>1. Draft a concise proposal (1-2 pages) outlining your:<br>· selected ethical issue,<br>· selected format, and<br>· plan to integrate philosophical concepts. <br>2. Describe the significance of the issue.<br>3. Identify your creative and analytical approach.<br>4. Include an informal list of potential sources (including the course textbook and course learning materials) and any visual or narrative strategies you anticipate using, especially for nontraditional formats. |
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Project: Part 2**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>1. A detailed development plan, in outline or diagrammatic form, that includes<br>· an outline or bulleted list of potential sources;<br>· notes on the relevance of each source to your project ideas.<br>2. A clear and affirmative statement of<br>· the specific topic area;<br>· the ethical issue, question, or problem you plan to address and explore;<br>· your specific, significant, and narrowly focused thesis or central idea of the project. <br>3. Choice of format through which you can demonstrate your learning and deliver your message. |
Bottom of Form
**## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Four: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast the political approach to interactions with the public and the judicial or legal approach to interactions with the public. Which of these would be more favorable in your opinion?<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400Rubric6-1.pdf**
Written Assignment Rubric
PAD 400 Introduction to Public Administration
Levels of
Achievement
Criteria Unacceptable
25 points / 5
points each
Acceptable
30 points / 6
points each
Good
40 points / 8
points each
Exemplary
50 points/10
points each
Purpose The purpose or
argument is generally
unclear.
The central purpose or
argument is not
consistently clear
throughout the paper.
The writing has a clear
purpose or argument
but may sometimes
digress from it.
The writer's central
purpose or argument is
readily apparent to the
reader; clear thesis
sentence.
Content Central purpose or
argument is not clearly
identified. Analysis is
vague or not evident.
Information supports a
central purpose or
argument at times but
often strays from
purpose. Analysis is
basic or general.
Information provides
reasonable support for
a central purpose or
argument and displays
evidence of a basic
analysis of a significant
topic.
Balanced presentation
of relevant and
legitimate information
that clearly supports a
central purpose or
argument and shows a
thoughtful, in-depth
analysis of a significant
topic; content is
specific, accurate,
interesting and
appropriate.
Organization The writing is not
logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail
to make sense
together. The reader
cannot identify a line of
reasoning and loses
interest.
In general, the writing
is arranged logically,
although occasionally
ideas fail to make
sense together. The
reader is fairly clear
about what the writer
intends.
The ideas are
arranged logically to
support the central
purpose or argument.
Ideas are usually
clearly linked to each
other. For the most
part, the reader can
follow the line of
reasoning.
The ideas are
arranged logically to
support the purpose or
argument. Ideas flow
smoothly from one to
another and are clearly
linked to each other.
The reader can follow
the line of reasoning.
APA Format of the
document is not
recognizable as APA.
There are frequent
errors in APA format.
APA format is used
with minor errors;
follows APA guidelines
with regard to
mechanics, sentence
structure, and word
choice with few minor
errors.
APA format is used
accurately and
consistently in the
paper and on the
"References" section;
follows APA guidelines
with regard to
mechanics, sentence
structure, and word
choice.
Grammar &
Spelling
Very frequent grammar
and/or spelling errors.
A few grammar and/or
spelling errors.
Only one or two errors
in spelling/grammar.
All grammar and
spelling are correct.
**## finalprojectpartIIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 3
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Paper: Part 3**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>· A comprehensive draft of your project.<br>· This draft should reflect advanced engagement with your topic and serve as a near-final version of your work.<br>· Leave "space" in the project for final revisions and responses to feedback. |
Bottom of Form
**## PHL337SubmissionlinkCEDPARTIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission link: CED Part I
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| ****Overview****<br>**Ethical or moral dilemmas are situations where one must choose between multiple options for beliefs and actions that are morally right and ethically sound. These choices are often fraught with difficulty, as no option is clearly preferable or unproblematically acceptable. Typically, ethical dilemmas involve conflicting moral imperatives, where following one rule means transgressing another.**<br>**Reflect on a significant and consequential ethical dilemma in your life when you made a decision that you either**<br>****_believed at the time or now recognize to be morally wrong_**. Describe the situation, including the context necessary for a full understanding of your role and the ethical importance of the scenario. This first attempt, written completely in your own words without consulting any external sources, references, or writing-assistance tools, is worth 5 points, making up 3% of your course grade.**<br> <br>****Assignment Details****<br>**1.**<br>****Describe the Ethical Dilemma:****<br>**· Provide an experiential account of a significant moral dilemma from your life in which you made the wrong choice.**<br>**· Include all relevant contextual information to fully explain the situation.**<br>**2.**<br>****Explain Your Decision-Making Process:****<br>**· Discuss the ethical framework or factors that guided your decision.**<br>**· Explain the reasoning behind the choice you made at the time.**<br>**· Consider whether you were influenced by:**<br>**· A pre-existing ethical system, such as societal norms or legal codes.**<br>**· The moral code of a religious or cultural tradition.**<br>**· A philosophically determined ethical system.**<br>**· Your personal instincts, intuitions, or subjective moral guidelines.**<br>**3.**<br>****Assess Your Decision:****<br>**· Reflect on why you now believe your choice was ethically wrong.**<br>**· Explain what you would do differently, if anything, if faced with the same situation today and why.**<br>**· Discuss your current perspective on the decision and the reasoning or emotional attitudes that supported it.**<br>**Do not consult the course textbook or external sources for this essay; focus on your personal experience and reflections. Later in the course, you will revisit this dilemma with, it is hoped, new insights from the ideas and theories studied and the opportunity to re-evaluate your decision with a deeper understanding of ethical principles.**<br>**Please limit this initial reflection to**<br>****no more than 1000 words** and ensure it meets a**<br>****minimum word count of 350 words**. This account should be written in basic essay form, and**<br>****do not use AI** language generators to help you write this. This first essay should be**<br>****_in your own words and reflect your own experience_**. Remember to review the grading rubric for this assignment.** |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Two: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Keynesian economics is one of the most important economic theories regarding government spending. Explain the major components of Keynesian economics.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week One: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Select a federal government agency that affects your life. Describe its purpose. How does it affect your life? What changes would you like to see in this agency?<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**SubmissionLinkCEDPARTIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/submissionlinkcedpartiiinstructions-docx)
**PHL337WRITINGPARTIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phl337writingpartirubric-pdf)
**PARTIIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/partiirubric-pdf)
**PARTIIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/partiirubric-pdf)
**## PHL337TEXTBOOKINFO.docx**
· Moral of the Story: An Introduction to Ethics, 9th Edition
By: Rosenstand, Nina
ISBN: 978-1-259-23119-3
**## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Four: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast substantive and procedural due process, especially as they apply to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week One: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast the political approach to public administration and the legal approach to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Two: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Discuss the problems and the advantages of the judicial approach to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIVINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 4
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Paper: Part 4**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>· Final version of your completed project uploaded into the course.<br>· Include a short reflection on your efforts and what you learned.<br>· This project should<br>· reveal your interest in and engagement with the issue or topic, and<br>· showcase your ability to produce scholarly and creative output. |
Bottom of Form
**## BOOKINFO.docx**
· Public Administration: An Introduction, 3rd Edition
By: Holzer, Marc / Schwester, Richard W.
ISBN: 978-1-138-57966-8
**## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Three: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast how the four main approaches to public administration (traditional managerial, new managerial, political, and judicial) address analyzing the success of administrative policies and regulation.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Three: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Identify a proposed regulation from a federal agency that you are interested in. It will be published in the Federal Register. Understand the purposes behind the regulation and identify who is likely to oppose it and who is likely to support the regulation.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Project: Part 1**<br>**Deliverable: Written Project Proposal or Plan**<br>1. Draft a concise proposal (1-2 pages) outlining your:<br>· selected ethical issue,<br>· selected format, and<br>· plan to integrate philosophical concepts. <br>2. Describe the significance of the issue.<br>3. Identify your creative and analytical approach.<br>4. Include an informal list of potential sources (including the course textbook and course learning materials) and any visual or narrative strategies you anticipate using, especially for nontraditional formats. |
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Project: Part 2**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>1. A detailed development plan, in outline or diagrammatic form, that includes<br>· an outline or bulleted list of potential sources;<br>· notes on the relevance of each source to your project ideas.<br>2. A clear and affirmative statement of<br>· the specific topic area;<br>· the ethical issue, question, or problem you plan to address and explore;<br>· your specific, significant, and narrowly focused thesis or central idea of the project. <br>3. Choice of format through which you can demonstrate your learning and deliver your message. |
Bottom of Form
**## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Four: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast the political approach to interactions with the public and the judicial or legal approach to interactions with the public. Which of these would be more favorable in your opinion?<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400Rubric6-1.pdf**
Written Assignment Rubric
PAD 400 Introduction to Public Administration
Levels of
Achievement
Criteria Unacceptable
25 points / 5
points each
Acceptable
30 points / 6
points each
Good
40 points / 8
points each
Exemplary
50 points/10
points each
Purpose The purpose or
argument is generally
unclear.
The central purpose or
argument is not
consistently clear
throughout the paper.
The writing has a clear
purpose or argument
but may sometimes
digress from it.
The writer's central
purpose or argument is
readily apparent to the
reader; clear thesis
sentence.
Content Central purpose or
argument is not clearly
identified. Analysis is
vague or not evident.
Information supports a
central purpose or
argument at times but
often strays from
purpose. Analysis is
basic or general.
Information provides
reasonable support for
a central purpose or
argument and displays
evidence of a basic
analysis of a significant
topic.
Balanced presentation
of relevant and
legitimate information
that clearly supports a
central purpose or
argument and shows a
thoughtful, in-depth
analysis of a significant
topic; content is
specific, accurate,
interesting and
appropriate.
Organization The writing is not
logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail
to make sense
together. The reader
cannot identify a line of
reasoning and loses
interest.
In general, the writing
is arranged logically,
although occasionally
ideas fail to make
sense together. The
reader is fairly clear
about what the writer
intends.
The ideas are
arranged logically to
support the central
purpose or argument.
Ideas are usually
clearly linked to each
other. For the most
part, the reader can
follow the line of
reasoning.
The ideas are
arranged logically to
support the purpose or
argument. Ideas flow
smoothly from one to
another and are clearly
linked to each other.
The reader can follow
the line of reasoning.
APA Format of the
document is not
recognizable as APA.
There are frequent
errors in APA format.
APA format is used
with minor errors;
follows APA guidelines
with regard to
mechanics, sentence
structure, and word
choice with few minor
errors.
APA format is used
accurately and
consistently in the
paper and on the
"References" section;
follows APA guidelines
with regard to
mechanics, sentence
structure, and word
choice.
Grammar &
Spelling
Very frequent grammar
and/or spelling errors.
A few grammar and/or
spelling errors.
Only one or two errors
in spelling/grammar.
All grammar and
spelling are correct.
**## finalprojectpartIIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 3
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Paper: Part 3**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>· A comprehensive draft of your project.<br>· This draft should reflect advanced engagement with your topic and serve as a near-final version of your work.<br>· Leave "space" in the project for final revisions and responses to feedback. |
Bottom of Form
**## PHL337SubmissionlinkCEDPARTIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission link: CED Part I
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| ****Overview****<br>**Ethical or moral dilemmas are situations where one must choose between multiple options for beliefs and actions that are morally right and ethically sound. These choices are often fraught with difficulty, as no option is clearly preferable or unproblematically acceptable. Typically, ethical dilemmas involve conflicting moral imperatives, where following one rule means transgressing another.**<br>**Reflect on a significant and consequential ethical dilemma in your life when you made a decision that you either**<br>****_believed at the time or now recognize to be morally wrong_**. Describe the situation, including the context necessary for a full understanding of your role and the ethical importance of the scenario. This first attempt, written completely in your own words without consulting any external sources, references, or writing-assistance tools, is worth 5 points, making up 3% of your course grade.**<br> <br>****Assignment Details****<br>**1.**<br>****Describe the Ethical Dilemma:****<br>**· Provide an experiential account of a significant moral dilemma from your life in which you made the wrong choice.**<br>**· Include all relevant contextual information to fully explain the situation.**<br>**2.**<br>****Explain Your Decision-Making Process:****<br>**· Discuss the ethical framework or factors that guided your decision.**<br>**· Explain the reasoning behind the choice you made at the time.**<br>**· Consider whether you were influenced by:**<br>**· A pre-existing ethical system, such as societal norms or legal codes.**<br>**· The moral code of a religious or cultural tradition.**<br>**· A philosophically determined ethical system.**<br>**· Your personal instincts, intuitions, or subjective moral guidelines.**<br>**3.**<br>****Assess Your Decision:****<br>**· Reflect on why you now believe your choice was ethically wrong.**<br>**· Explain what you would do differently, if anything, if faced with the same situation today and why.**<br>**· Discuss your current perspective on the decision and the reasoning or emotional attitudes that supported it.**<br>**Do not consult the course textbook or external sources for this essay; focus on your personal experience and reflections. Later in the course, you will revisit this dilemma with, it is hoped, new insights from the ideas and theories studied and the opportunity to re-evaluate your decision with a deeper understanding of ethical principles.**<br>**Please limit this initial reflection to**<br>****no more than 1000 words** and ensure it meets a**<br>****minimum word count of 350 words**. This account should be written in basic essay form, and**<br>****do not use AI** language generators to help you write this. This first essay should be**<br>****_in your own words and reflect your own experience_**. Remember to review the grading rubric for this assignment.** |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Two: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Keynesian economics is one of the most important economic theories regarding government spending. Explain the major components of Keynesian economics.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week One: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Select a federal government agency that affects your life. Describe its purpose. How does it affect your life? What changes would you like to see in this agency?<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**SubmissionLinkCEDPARTIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/submissionlinkcedpartiiinstructions-docx)
**PHL337WRITINGPARTIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phl337writingpartirubric-pdf)
**PARTIIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/partiirubric-pdf)
**## PHL337TEXTBOOKINFO.docx**
· Moral of the Story: An Introduction to Ethics, 9th Edition
By: Rosenstand, Nina
ISBN: 978-1-259-23119-3
**## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Four: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast substantive and procedural due process, especially as they apply to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week One: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast the political approach to public administration and the legal approach to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Two: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Discuss the problems and the advantages of the judicial approach to public administration.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIVINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 4
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Paper: Part 4**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>· Final version of your completed project uploaded into the course.<br>· Include a short reflection on your efforts and what you learned.<br>· This project should<br>· reveal your interest in and engagement with the issue or topic, and<br>· showcase your ability to produce scholarly and creative output. |
Bottom of Form
**## BOOKINFO.docx**
· Public Administration: An Introduction, 3rd Edition
By: Holzer, Marc / Schwester, Richard W.
ISBN: 978-1-138-57966-8
**## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Three: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast how the four main approaches to public administration (traditional managerial, new managerial, political, and judicial) address analyzing the success of administrative policies and regulation.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK3ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Three: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Identify a proposed regulation from a federal agency that you are interested in. It will be published in the Federal Register. Understand the purposes behind the regulation and identify who is likely to oppose it and who is likely to support the regulation.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Project: Part 1**<br>**Deliverable: Written Project Proposal or Plan**<br>1. Draft a concise proposal (1-2 pages) outlining your:<br>· selected ethical issue,<br>· selected format, and<br>· plan to integrate philosophical concepts. <br>2. Describe the significance of the issue.<br>3. Identify your creative and analytical approach.<br>4. Include an informal list of potential sources (including the course textbook and course learning materials) and any visual or narrative strategies you anticipate using, especially for nontraditional formats. |
Bottom of Form
**## finalprojectpartIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Project: Part 2**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>1. A detailed development plan, in outline or diagrammatic form, that includes<br>· an outline or bulleted list of potential sources;<br>· notes on the relevance of each source to your project ideas.<br>2. A clear and affirmative statement of<br>· the specific topic area;<br>· the ethical issue, question, or problem you plan to address and explore;<br>· your specific, significant, and narrowly focused thesis or central idea of the project. <br>3. Choice of format through which you can demonstrate your learning and deliver your message. |
Bottom of Form
**## WEEK4ASSIGNMENT2INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Four: Assignment 2
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Compare and contrast the political approach to interactions with the public and the judicial or legal approach to interactions with the public. Which of these would be more favorable in your opinion?<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400Rubric6-1.pdf**
Written Assignment Rubric
PAD 400 Introduction to Public Administration
Levels of
Achievement
Criteria Unacceptable
25 points / 5
points each
Acceptable
30 points / 6
points each
Good
40 points / 8
points each
Exemplary
50 points/10
points each
Purpose The purpose or
argument is generally
unclear.
The central purpose or
argument is not
consistently clear
throughout the paper.
The writing has a clear
purpose or argument
but may sometimes
digress from it.
The writer's central
purpose or argument is
readily apparent to the
reader; clear thesis
sentence.
Content Central purpose or
argument is not clearly
identified. Analysis is
vague or not evident.
Information supports a
central purpose or
argument at times but
often strays from
purpose. Analysis is
basic or general.
Information provides
reasonable support for
a central purpose or
argument and displays
evidence of a basic
analysis of a significant
topic.
Balanced presentation
of relevant and
legitimate information
that clearly supports a
central purpose or
argument and shows a
thoughtful, in-depth
analysis of a significant
topic; content is
specific, accurate,
interesting and
appropriate.
Organization The writing is not
logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail
to make sense
together. The reader
cannot identify a line of
reasoning and loses
interest.
In general, the writing
is arranged logically,
although occasionally
ideas fail to make
sense together. The
reader is fairly clear
about what the writer
intends.
The ideas are
arranged logically to
support the central
purpose or argument.
Ideas are usually
clearly linked to each
other. For the most
part, the reader can
follow the line of
reasoning.
The ideas are
arranged logically to
support the purpose or
argument. Ideas flow
smoothly from one to
another and are clearly
linked to each other.
The reader can follow
the line of reasoning.
APA Format of the
document is not
recognizable as APA.
There are frequent
errors in APA format.
APA format is used
with minor errors;
follows APA guidelines
with regard to
mechanics, sentence
structure, and word
choice with few minor
errors.
APA format is used
accurately and
consistently in the
paper and on the
"References" section;
follows APA guidelines
with regard to
mechanics, sentence
structure, and word
choice.
Grammar &
Spelling
Very frequent grammar
and/or spelling errors.
A few grammar and/or
spelling errors.
Only one or two errors
in spelling/grammar.
All grammar and
spelling are correct.
**## finalprojectpartIIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission Link: Final Project – Part 3
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| **Final Paper: Part 3**<br>**Deliverable:**<br>· A comprehensive draft of your project.<br>· This draft should reflect advanced engagement with your topic and serve as a near-final version of your work.<br>· Leave "space" in the project for final revisions and responses to feedback. |
Bottom of Form
**## PHL337SubmissionlinkCEDPARTIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Submission link: CED Part I
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| ****Overview****<br>**Ethical or moral dilemmas are situations where one must choose between multiple options for beliefs and actions that are morally right and ethically sound. These choices are often fraught with difficulty, as no option is clearly preferable or unproblematically acceptable. Typically, ethical dilemmas involve conflicting moral imperatives, where following one rule means transgressing another.**<br>**Reflect on a significant and consequential ethical dilemma in your life when you made a decision that you either**<br>****_believed at the time or now recognize to be morally wrong_**. Describe the situation, including the context necessary for a full understanding of your role and the ethical importance of the scenario. This first attempt, written completely in your own words without consulting any external sources, references, or writing-assistance tools, is worth 5 points, making up 3% of your course grade.**<br> <br>****Assignment Details****<br>**1.**<br>****Describe the Ethical Dilemma:****<br>**· Provide an experiential account of a significant moral dilemma from your life in which you made the wrong choice.**<br>**· Include all relevant contextual information to fully explain the situation.**<br>**2.**<br>****Explain Your Decision-Making Process:****<br>**· Discuss the ethical framework or factors that guided your decision.**<br>**· Explain the reasoning behind the choice you made at the time.**<br>**· Consider whether you were influenced by:**<br>**· A pre-existing ethical system, such as societal norms or legal codes.**<br>**· The moral code of a religious or cultural tradition.**<br>**· A philosophically determined ethical system.**<br>**· Your personal instincts, intuitions, or subjective moral guidelines.**<br>**3.**<br>****Assess Your Decision:****<br>**· Reflect on why you now believe your choice was ethically wrong.**<br>**· Explain what you would do differently, if anything, if faced with the same situation today and why.**<br>**· Discuss your current perspective on the decision and the reasoning or emotional attitudes that supported it.**<br>**Do not consult the course textbook or external sources for this essay; focus on your personal experience and reflections. Later in the course, you will revisit this dilemma with, it is hoped, new insights from the ideas and theories studied and the opportunity to re-evaluate your decision with a deeper understanding of ethical principles.**<br>**Please limit this initial reflection to**<br>****no more than 1000 words** and ensure it meets a**<br>****minimum word count of 350 words**. This account should be written in basic essay form, and**<br>****do not use AI** language generators to help you write this. This first essay should be**<br>****_in your own words and reflect your own experience_**. Remember to review the grading rubric for this assignment.** |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WEEK2ASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week Two: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Keynesian economics is one of the most important economic theories regarding government spending. Explain the major components of Keynesian economics.<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**## PAD400WeekOneASSIGNMENT1INSTRUCTIONS.docx**
Week One: Assignment 1
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Hide Assignment Information |
| Instructions | |
| Select a federal government agency that affects your life. Describe its purpose. How does it affect your life? What changes would you like to see in this agency?<br>Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). <br>**Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded.** This assignment is worth 50 points.<br> <br>Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded. |
Bottom of Form
**SubmissionLinkCEDPARTIIINSTRUCTIONS.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/submissionlinkcedpartiiinstructions-docx)
**PHL337WRITINGPARTIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/phl337writingpartirubric-pdf)
**PARTIIRUBRIC.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/partiirubric-pdf)