My Blog

Tag: Law

  • [Solved] DB

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached. – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsCJUS350.docx – ## DiscussionThreadWK8.docx **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsCJUS350.docx** CJUS 350 **Discussion Assignment Instructions** The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached.

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsCJUS350.docx

    – ## DiscussionThreadWK8.docx

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsCJUS350.docx**

    CJUS 350

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at least 200 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 2 scholarly citation(s) in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, journal articles and professional experiences.

    **## DiscussionThreadWK8.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Right or Wrong**

    Please post your answers to the following questions:

    · Can an independent thinker be a team player?

    · Should we admit to doing wrong?

    · What is the difference between a mistake of the mind and a mistake of the heart?

    Dilemma:
    You are the lead investigator in a double homicide case. You develop a suspect, and during your interrogation, you have the opportunity to lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case. The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld lying to a suspect as an ethical practice in Arthur v. Commonwealth 1997. As a Christian, you know it is a sin to lie. Will you lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case in an attempt to illicit a voluntary confession? This interrogation technique is legally accepted; however, is it moral and ethical?

    During this class, we have continued to emphasize the importance of strong character driven leadership. Please provide a biblical example of unethical leadership and describe its consequences. Please provide a biblical example of strong ethical leadership and describe its advantages.

    **## DiscussionThreadWK8.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Right or Wrong**

    Please post your answers to the following questions:

    · Can an independent thinker be a team player?

    · Should we admit to doing wrong?

    · What is the difference between a mistake of the mind and a mistake of the heart?

    Dilemma:
    You are the lead investigator in a double homicide case. You develop a suspect, and during your interrogation, you have the opportunity to lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case. The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld lying to a suspect as an ethical practice in Arthur v. Commonwealth 1997. As a Christian, you know it is a sin to lie. Will you lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case in an attempt to illicit a voluntary confession? This interrogation technique is legally accepted; however, is it moral and ethical?

    During this class, we have continued to emphasize the importance of strong character driven leadership. Please provide a biblical example of unethical leadership and describe its consequences. Please provide a biblical example of strong ethical leadership and describe its advantages.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsCJUS350.docx**

    CJUS 350

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at least 200 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 2 scholarly citation(s) in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, journal articles and professional experiences.

    **## DiscussionThreadWK8.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Right or Wrong**

    Please post your answers to the following questions:

    · Can an independent thinker be a team player?

    · Should we admit to doing wrong?

    · What is the difference between a mistake of the mind and a mistake of the heart?

    Dilemma:
    You are the lead investigator in a double homicide case. You develop a suspect, and during your interrogation, you have the opportunity to lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case. The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld lying to a suspect as an ethical practice in Arthur v. Commonwealth 1997. As a Christian, you know it is a sin to lie. Will you lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case in an attempt to illicit a voluntary confession? This interrogation technique is legally accepted; however, is it moral and ethical?

    During this class, we have continued to emphasize the importance of strong character driven leadership. Please provide a biblical example of unethical leadership and describe its consequences. Please provide a biblical example of strong ethical leadership and describe its advantages.

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructionsCJUS350.docx**

    CJUS 350

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at least 200 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 2 scholarly citation(s) in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, journal articles and professional experiences.

    **## DiscussionThreadWK8.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Right or Wrong**

    Please post your answers to the following questions:

    · Can an independent thinker be a team player?

    · Should we admit to doing wrong?

    · What is the difference between a mistake of the mind and a mistake of the heart?

    Dilemma:
    You are the lead investigator in a double homicide case. You develop a suspect, and during your interrogation, you have the opportunity to lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case. The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld lying to a suspect as an ethical practice in Arthur v. Commonwealth 1997. As a Christian, you know it is a sin to lie. Will you lie to the suspect concerning the evidence you have against him in this case in an attempt to illicit a voluntary confession? This interrogation technique is legally accepted; however, is it moral and ethical?

    During this class, we have continued to emphasize the importance of strong character driven leadership. Please provide a biblical example of unethical leadership and describe its consequences. Please provide a biblical example of strong ethical leadership and describe its advantages.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Why You Need a Family Law Attorney in Santa Ana

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Family law matters, including divorce, child custody, and spousal support disputes, can be emotionally and legally complex. Navigating these issues without professional guidance can result in costly mistakes and unfavorable outcomes. Hiring a <a href="https://josfamilylaw.com/child-custody-lawyer-sa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Family law matters, including divorce, child custody, and spousal support disputes, can be emotionally and legally complex. Navigating these issues without professional guidance can result in costly mistakes and unfavorable outcomes. Hiring a <a href="https://josfamilylaw.com/child-custody-lawyer-santa-ana.php">family law attorney in Santa Ana</a> ensures your rights are protected and your case is handled efficiently.
    Services Provided by a Family Law Attorney
    A skilled family law attorney Santa Ana provides comprehensive legal support:
    ·        Divorce and Separation Guidance: From filing petitions to negotiating settlements, [your attorney manages](https://josfamilylaw.com/child-custody-lawyer-santa-ana.php) all aspects of the divorce process.
    ·        Child Custody and Visitation Planning: Attorneys help create fair custody schedules and visitation plans that prioritize the child’s best interests.
    ·        Spousal Support and Asset Division: Legal guidance ensures property, assets, and spousal support are divided equitably under California law.
    Benefits of Hiring a Family Law Attorney in Santa Ana
    Professional representation offers numerous advantages:
    ·        Protecting Your Legal Rights: Your attorney safeguards your interests throughout negotiations, mediation, and court proceedings.
    ·        Navigating Santa Ana Family Courts: Experienced attorneys are familiar with local courts, judges, and procedures, which can expedite your case.
    ·        Reducing Emotional Stress: Legal representation allows you to focus on your family while your attorney handles the complexities of your case.
    When to Hire a Family Law Attorney
    It’s essential to engage a family law attorney Santa Ana in situations such as:
    ·        High-Conflict Divorces or Custody Disputes: Attorneys manage disputes efficiently while advocating for your rights.
    ·        Modifications of Existing Agreements: When custody or support arrangements need updating, your lawyer ensures legal compliance.
    ·        Legal Representation During Mediation or Court Hearings: A professional ensures your case is presented clearly and effectively.
    Conclusion
    Family law matters are complex, and attempting to navigate them alone can be risky. A family law attorney in Santa Ana offers expert guidance, safeguards your rights, and helps achieve fair outcomes for you and your family.

  • [Solved] INTRO

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ IMG_9275.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9275-jpeg "IMG_9275.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    IMG_9275.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-9275-jpeg "IMG_9275.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Law – Criminal homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Law – Criminal homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SCMT509

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Read attachment for assignment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## week8assignment.docx **## week8assignment.docx** **Instructions** This assignment is an essay assignment of two questions to test knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. You may use any of the texts, readings from this cour…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Read attachment for assignment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## week8assignment.docx

    **## week8assignment.docx**

    **Instructions**

    This assignment is an essay assignment of two questions to test knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. You may use any of the texts, readings from this course and outside material that is academic in nature.

    1. Summarize two main strategies for managing a cross-cultural security force in a global environment.

    2. Select a technology which has globally impacted the security industry and apply how it is utilized to a particular security facility or function.

    **Technical Requirements**

    · Your paper must be a minimum 2-3 pages per question for a total of 4-6 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).

    · Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.

    · Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.

    · Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.

    · Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.

    · All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

    **## week8assignment.docx**

    **Instructions**

    This assignment is an essay assignment of two questions to test knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. You may use any of the texts, readings from this course and outside material that is academic in nature.

    1. Summarize two main strategies for managing a cross-cultural security force in a global environment.

    2. Select a technology which has globally impacted the security industry and apply how it is utilized to a particular security facility or function.

    **Technical Requirements**

    · Your paper must be a minimum 2-3 pages per question for a total of 4-6 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).

    · Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.

    · Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.

    · Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.

    · Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.

    · All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

  • [Solved] Responses 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Document4.docx **## Document4.docx** 1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable results. I…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Document4.docx

    **## Document4.docx**

    1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable results. Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study can demonstrate a causal relationship between variables, while external validity pertains to the generalizability of the findings to broader populations or settings (Rennison & Hart, 2022). Several threats to both internal and external validity exist, and researchers must implement strategies to control for these issues.

    Threats to Internal Validity and Their Controls

    History: This occurs when events outside the experiment influence the outcome. For instance, if a study on crime prevention techniques coincides with a high-profile crime event, public attitudes may shift, affecting the results. To control for history, researchers can use control groups and ensure that experimental and control conditions experience the same external influences (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Maturation: Over time, participants naturally change, which may impact study outcomes, particularly in longitudinal studies. To mitigate this, researchers can use shorter study durations, employ matched control groups, or statistically adjust for maturation effects through time-series analysis (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Testing Effects: When participants take the same test multiple times, they may improve simply due to familiarity rather than the experimental intervention. To counteract this, researchers can use alternative test forms, implement a control group, or conduct pre-tests and post-tests at varying intervals (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Instrumentation: Changes in measurement tools or observer behaviors over time can lead to inconsistencies. Ensuring standardized procedures, maintaining consistent scoring rubrics, and calibrating instruments periodically help control for this threat (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Threats to External Validity and Their Controls

    Selection Bias: If participants are not randomly selected, the results may not be generalizable to the larger population. Randomization, stratified sampling, and ensuring a representative sample can help mitigate selection bias (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Reactivity (Hawthorne Effect): Participants may alter their behavior simply because they are aware they are being observed. To control for reactivity, researchers can use unobtrusive measures, conduct double-blind studies, or employ deception (with ethical considerations) to minimize awareness of the experimental conditions (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Interaction Effects: Sometimes, the interaction between selection and treatment, or pre-testing and treatment, can impact generalizability. Conducting field experiments, using diverse samples, and replicating studies in different contexts can reduce these concerns (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    By understanding and addressing these threats, researchers can enhance both the internal and external validity of their studies, leading to more accurate and applicable findings in criminal justice research.

    2. Threats to internal validity, like history and maturation, can seriously mess with the accuracy of experimental results.  History effects happen when outside events influence participants during a study, making it hard to tell if the changes seen are due to the experiment itself.  One way to control for this is by using a control group that doesn’t get the treatment, so researchers can compare and see if the changes happen regardless of the experiment.  Maturation, on the other hand, refers to natural changes in participants over time, like growing older or gaining experience, which can affect results.  A good way to handle this is by keeping experiments short when possible and ensuring both experimental and control groups are similar in age, experience, or other relevant factors (Rennison, 2019).

    External validity threats, like selection bias and reactivity, can mess up how well results apply to a larger population. Selection bias happens when the sample isn’t truly representative, which can be controlled by using random selection and stratified sampling to ensure diversity.  Reactivity, where participants change their behavior just because they know they’re being studied, is another issue.  To reduce this, researchers can use deception when ethical, keep the study’s true purpose hidden until after data collection, or use unobtrusive measures to observe behavior naturally. Controlling for these threats helps ensure that findings aren’t just valid in a controlled lab setting but also hold weight in the real world (Rennison, 2019).

    **## Document4.docx**

    1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable results. Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study can demonstrate a causal relationship between variables, while external validity pertains to the generalizability of the findings to broader populations or settings (Rennison & Hart, 2022). Several threats to both internal and external validity exist, and researchers must implement strategies to control for these issues.

    Threats to Internal Validity and Their Controls

    History: This occurs when events outside the experiment influence the outcome. For instance, if a study on crime prevention techniques coincides with a high-profile crime event, public attitudes may shift, affecting the results. To control for history, researchers can use control groups and ensure that experimental and control conditions experience the same external influences (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Maturation: Over time, participants naturally change, which may impact study outcomes, particularly in longitudinal studies. To mitigate this, researchers can use shorter study durations, employ matched control groups, or statistically adjust for maturation effects through time-series analysis (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Testing Effects: When participants take the same test multiple times, they may improve simply due to familiarity rather than the experimental intervention. To counteract this, researchers can use alternative test forms, implement a control group, or conduct pre-tests and post-tests at varying intervals (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Instrumentation: Changes in measurement tools or observer behaviors over time can lead to inconsistencies. Ensuring standardized procedures, maintaining consistent scoring rubrics, and calibrating instruments periodically help control for this threat (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Threats to External Validity and Their Controls

    Selection Bias: If participants are not randomly selected, the results may not be generalizable to the larger population. Randomization, stratified sampling, and ensuring a representative sample can help mitigate selection bias (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Reactivity (Hawthorne Effect): Participants may alter their behavior simply because they are aware they are being observed. To control for reactivity, researchers can use unobtrusive measures, conduct double-blind studies, or employ deception (with ethical considerations) to minimize awareness of the experimental conditions (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    Interaction Effects: Sometimes, the interaction between selection and treatment, or pre-testing and treatment, can impact generalizability. Conducting field experiments, using diverse samples, and replicating studies in different contexts can reduce these concerns (Rennison & Hart, 2022).

    By understanding and addressing these threats, researchers can enhance both the internal and external validity of their studies, leading to more accurate and applicable findings in criminal justice research.

    2. Threats to internal validity, like history and maturation, can seriously mess with the accuracy of experimental results.  History effects happen when outside events influence participants during a study, making it hard to tell if the changes seen are due to the experiment itself.  One way to control for this is by using a control group that doesn’t get the treatment, so researchers can compare and see if the changes happen regardless of the experiment.  Maturation, on the other hand, refers to natural changes in participants over time, like growing older or gaining experience, which can affect results.  A good way to handle this is by keeping experiments short when possible and ensuring both experimental and control groups are similar in age, experience, or other relevant factors (Rennison, 2019).

    External validity threats, like selection bias and reactivity, can mess up how well results apply to a larger population. Selection bias happens when the sample isn’t truly representative, which can be controlled by using random selection and stratified sampling to ensure diversity.  Reactivity, where participants change their behavior just because they know they’re being studied, is another issue.  To reduce this, researchers can use deception when ethical, keep the study’s true purpose hidden until after data collection, or use unobtrusive measures to observe behavior naturally. Controlling for these threats helps ensure that findings aren’t just valid in a controlled lab setting but also hold weight in the real world (Rennison, 2019).

  • [Solved] Rough Dr’aft Pa’per

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **Rough Dr’aft pa’per prompt.** Couple of pointers as to rough dr’aft pa’per: – there is no need for a tit’le pa’ge, a ref’erence pa’ge, or listing of or how many ref’erences – you can paraphrase, and also use direct quotes; w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **Rough Dr’aft pa’per prompt.** Couple of pointers as to rough dr’aft pa’per:

    – there is no need for a tit’le pa’ge, a ref’erence pa’ge, or listing of or how many ref’erences
    – you can paraphrase, and also use direct quotes; what I would want to see is "how" you ci’te the source in the sen’tence to ensure you are doing it correctly
    – you can ty’pe a couple of pa’ges of text followed by an out’line of what the rest of your pa’per will cover
    – do not submit the full complete paper; this is only the _rough dr’aft_ consisting of only a couple of pa’ges

    Typ’ewritten pa’per consisting of 3 to 4 pa’ges on Res’earch Pa’per to’pic selected.

    Your to’pic is: **Gang Violence in Fresno: Causes, Impact, and Law Enforcement Response.**

    – The socioeconomic factors fueling gang recruitment in Fresno.
    – The connection between gang activity and violent crime rates.
    – Law enforcement strategies, such as Operation No Fly Zone and gang injunctions.
    – The effectiveness of community programs aimed at reducing gang violence.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Hello everyone, This week’s case dealt with the assessment process of a convicted male awaiting sentencing. Jay is a 20 something year old college educated man that was raised by father and mother, who has epilepsy, and has th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Hello everyone,

            This week’s case dealt with the assessment process of a convicted male awaiting sentencing.

            Jay is a 20 something year old college educated man that was raised by father and mother, who has epilepsy, and has three sisters: two older half-sisters and one younger full sister (Tully & Bamford, 2019). Jay's mother required full-time care which was provided by Jay's father. Neither parent worked and were receiving state benefits, which they used as their main income to support the family (Tully & Bamford, 2019). Jay attended three years of college for which after he left, for about five years, outside of a contract position that he held for seven months, he did not acquire a job and volunteered at a charity shop while collecting state benefits (Tully & Bamford, 2019).

            Jay has had two sexual relationships. One being the first around the age of 19 and lasting for three years while the other, a long-distance relationship, was about five years after the end of the first relationship and was with a female he met online and have sex every couple of months when they met (Tully & Bamford, 2019). He was in this relationship up until he committed his offense.

            Jay was accused and pled guilty to the following charges: (1) attempting sexual communication with a minor, (2) grooming and attempting to meet a female under the age of 16, and (3) attempting to have sexual penetration with a female under the age of 13 (Tully & Bamford, 2019). The offenders alleged actions occurred over a span of four days. During this time, he had online sexual conversations with an individual presenting to be a 12-year-old female. Although the individual identified themselves as a 12-year-old female, Jay initiated sexual conversations which included him making sexual advancements, discussing sexual acts (oral and penetrative sex), suggestions for the 12-year-old female to dress in a diaper and take pictures of herself to share with him which would be their secret, as well as posing questions about her touching her vagina and if she would like for him to touch her vagina with his hand or penis (Tully & Bamford, 2019). He eventually suggested that they meet and then go to his home, providing a plan of where to meet and the methods to get there. At the designated meeting spot, instead of a 12-year-old girl that Jay expected, he was met by hey vigilante group that set up the profile and police (Tully & Bamford, 2019).

            The role the forensic psychology professional played in selecting the forensic risk assessment instruments used in this case is that of an evaluator. The purpose of the tools is to aid the forensic psychology professional in gathering information that they can review, analyze and then evaluate factors that can increase or mitigate risk which is then provided to their client in a medium which will allow their client to make an educated and knowledgeable decision (Simmons, et al., 2023). In other words, the tools allow the evaluator to use and present the data in a way that can be digested and is based on informed/empirical methodologies (Simmons, et al., 2023).

            In this case, the forensic psychology professional, the evaluator, used multiple assessment tools to compile the necessary data to determine risk. Tools such as the Risk Matrix 2000 and the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). The evaluator also used the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors to identify protective factors that would mitigate recidivism. These are examples of the characteristics of the assessment that make it effective for this case. To make an appropriate assessment that is impartial, unbiased, and empirically based, use methodologies that include both factors that would increase or decrease/ mitigate recidivism is preferred (Simmons et al., 2023).

            The implications regarding the selection of the assessment instrument used in this case are that the assessment is fair and based on tools that are based on empirical data. For instance, the RSVP is an instrument developed from a comprehensive analysis of scholarly literature on sexual violence (Tully & Bamford, 2019), while the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) evidence-based research (Burghart, et al., 2023). Use of assessment instruments as such shows that the evaluator is using instruments that are appropriate for the type of offense as well as ensuring that they provide a balanced and fair assessment.

    ## References

    Burghart, M., de Ruiter, C., Hynes, S. E., Krishnan, N., Levtova, Y., & Uyar, A. (2023). The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF): A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity. _Psychological Assessment, 35(1),_ , 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001184.

    Simmons, M. L., Ogloff, J. R., & Daffern, M. (2023). Investigating the dynamic nature of multiple risk assessment instruments in a forensic mental health hospital. _Psychological Assessment, 35(1)_, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001174.

    Tully, R., & Bamford, J. (2019). _Case Studies in Forensic Psychology: Clinical Assessment and Treatment._ Taylor and Francis (Books) Limited UK.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) At present, Jay is an adult male, reported to be in his twenties (Tully, 2019). Jay grew up with his biological parents and three sisters and reports that he did not experience any abuse within the home (Tully, 2019). Jay repo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    At present, Jay is an adult male, reported to be in his twenties (Tully, 2019). Jay grew up with his biological parents and three sisters and reports that he did not experience any abuse within the home (Tully, 2019). Jay reports feeling that his sisters sometimes received more attention than him and at one time he took his parent’s medication to gain attention (Tully, 2019). Jay’s mom was diagnosed with epilepsy and his father was her primary caretaker which impeded their ability to work ad so they relied on state benefits (Tully, 2019). Jay reports having a difficult time learning in school and experienced bullying to the degree of physical assault (Tully, 2019). Jay left high-school at age 16 after receiving several qualifications in technology, from there he attended college for three years (Tully, 2019). After college, Jay worked at a call-center for seven months and volunteered at a charity shop for five years (Tully, 2019). Jay reports having his first relationship with an 18-year-old female when he was 19-years-old (Tully, 2019). The relationship ended after about three years due to alleged violence towards Jay (Tully, 2019). After this, he moved back with his parent’s for about six months before moving to his own place, and he reports staying single for around five years (Tully, 2019). Jay reports entering into a long-distance relationship with an adult female who he would meet every couple of months for sex (Tully, 2019). Jay had not spoke to the woman since his arrest and assumes the relationship is over (Tully, 2019). Records show no indication of mental health or substance abuse issues (Tully, 2019). Jay denies having accessed indecent photos of children, although does report that he looked up a picture of a naked woman wearing a diaper which he used while masturbating about once per week (Tully, 2019).  Jay connected with a person online who was claiming to be a 12-year-old female but was actually a vigilante group that claims to hunt sexual predators (Tully, 2019). Over a four-day period, Jay was alleged to have groomed and then enticed the girl to meet him and engage in sexual acts, including intercourse (Tully, 2019). Jay is awaiting sentencing and the Judge has asked an expert psychologist to complete assessments related to Jay’s possible sexual deviance (Tully, 2019).

    **What Role did the Psychologist Play in Selecting the Risk Assessment used in this Case?**

    According to Tully (2019), when assessing sex offenders, structured risk assessments perform better than unstructured clinical judgement and the use of both actuarial measures as well as structured professional judgement risk assessments. Tully (2019), explains that the combination of these two approaches benefits the professional’s ability to formulate risk, develop plans for treatment, and reduce the risk of sexual reoffending (p.25).

    **Characteristics of the Assessment that make it Effective for this Case**

                In this case, several assessments were used to evaluate Jay and provide recommendations. Psychometric assessments including the response style assessment, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Rosenberg measure, and the Social-Problem-Solving-Inventory-Revised. The results of these assessments were taken into consideration as part of the risk assessment (Tully, 2019). Psychometric tests to examine all attitudes and difficulties that are related to sexual offending are not available (Tully, 2019), therefore, additional assessments are needed to identify potential risk of offending.

              The Risk Matrix 2000 is useful for assessing the risk of sexual reconviction by comparing the individual to groups of sex offenders through consideration of various static factors (Tully, 2019). Because the Risk Matrix “relies on number of sentencing appearances,” this assessment was provisionally applied to Jay’s case due to him having only had one sentencing appearance (Tully, 2019, p.30). Although the Risk Matrix 2000 “offers a useful filter” for identifying offenders who might need more treatment, it is difficult to apply the Risk Matrix 2000 statistics at the individual level (Tully, 2019, p.31).

             The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP) is the most widely used tool for risk assessment of sex offenders (Tully, 2019). The RSVP can be effective in Jay’s case because it is not a predictor of sexual violence but a way to identify relevant risk factors, develop a formulation for the offender’s sexual violence, and establish risk management plans (Tully, 2019). According to Sutherland et al. (2012), the RSVP has an overall good interrater reliability when used by professional who are trained specifically in forensic risk assessment. Tully (2019), states that this tool is generally considered to be a “valid and useful way of assessing risk at an individual level” (p.32).

    **Selected Assessment Tool and its Impact the Outcome of the Case**

               Sex crimes against children are possibly the most disturbing and of the cases reported, have a high rate of occurrence (Bartol & Bartol, 2021). The assessment tools in this case are imperative for identifying the potential for reoffending and developing the most effective treatment plan to support Jay. According to Bartol & Bartol (2021), recidivism is frequently studies and is one of the most important aspects of sex offending. The comprehensive use of assessment tools is imperative to understanding risk of reoffending and is the primary reason for assessing offenders (Bartol & Bartol, 2021). The outcome of Jay’s sentencing, therefore, will be guided by the formulation developed by the assessing psychologist.

    **References**

    Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2021). _Introduction to Forensic Psychology_. SAGE Publications.

    Sutherland, A. A., Johnstone, L., Davidson, K. M., Hart, S. D., Cooke, D. J., Kropp, P. R., Logan, C., Michie, C., & Stocks, R. (2012). Sexual Violence Risk Assessment: An Investigation of the Interrater Reliability of Professional Judgments Made Using the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol. _International Journal of Forensic Mental Health_, _11_(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.690020

    Tully, R. J. (2019). Sexual deviancy: Assessment for court. In R. Tully & J. Bamford (Eds.), Case studies in forensic psychology (pp. 25–40). Routledge

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] discussion 8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) In this module, we read about implementation evaluation. Specifically, the "process" components or inputs that are required to run criminal justice programs. Implementation is a big concern, because resources are spent here, a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    In this module, we read about implementation evaluation. Specifically, the "process" components or inputs that are required to run criminal justice programs. Implementation is a big concern, because resources are spent here, and the potential for mistakes and mismanagement is substantial. Mears comments on juvenile transfer and domestic violence mandatory arrest laws as two examples for our review.

    In this week's discussion, the first of two concerning implementation, please consider and respond to this question: Because criminal justice policies frequently involve many activities, and because it may not be possible to evaluate all such activities, what criteria should we use for selecting the policies whose implementation we will evaluate? In other words, should some parts of implementation (or implementation of some programs) be prioritized? If so, which one(s), and why? Should we pay more attention to the largest and/or most expensive programs, or the ones that are most difficult to faithfully implement?

    – 2 years ago