Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## W6730Replies.docx
**## W6730Replies.docx**
**Directions:** For each discussion below, you will individually post two replies to the posts of others of at least 150 words each. Each reply must incorporate at least one scholarly research article in current APA format. The source cited must have been published within the last five years.
As you participate in the Discussions in this course, remember to support your arguments with relevant research and evidence. Also, engage with your peers’ ideas by asking clarifying questions and offering constructive feedback.
**Classmate One (Sabrina):**
Project- based learning (PBL) and problem- based learning (PrBL) are two teaching methods that focus on real- world application. Both approaches help students develop critical thinking skills. However, they are different in how they are structured.
PBL involves students working on a project over time. The project usually has a clear goal and results in a final product, such as a model, presentation, or research paper. The teacher provides guidance while students explore the topic (Kadirhanogullari & Kose, 2023). In contrast, PrBL starts with an open- ended problem. Students must research, discuss, and develop their own solutions. There is no single correct answer, and teachers act as facilitators rather than direct instructors (Aidoo, 2023).
How would classroom planning and instruction need to change in order to fully capitalize on the strengths of problem- based learning?
To fully use problem- based learning, teachers need to change how they plan lessons. Instead of direct instruction, teachers should present real- world problems for students to solve. This requires a shift from a teacher- centered approach to student- led learning environment. Teachers must provide guiding questions and allow students to explore different solutions.
Collaboration is important in PrBL. Students should work in groups to share ideas and learn from each other. Technology can help with this process. Tools like Google Docs, discussion boards, and video conferencing allow students to collaborate effectively, even in online settings.
Assessment also needs to change. Instead of focusing on memorization, teachers should evaluate students based on their problem- solving skills. Rubrics can be used to measure how well students analyze problems, develop solutions, and explain their reasoning.
Using PrBL requires more flexibility in teaching. Students learn at different paces, so teachers should allow time for deeper exploration. This means moving away from strict schedules and letting students advance when they are ready. PrBL helps students develop critical thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. However, it requires changes in planning, instruction, and assessment. By making these adjustments, teachers can create a more engaging and effective learning environment (Aidoo, 2023).
References
Aidoo, B. (2023). Teacher Educators Experience Adopting Problem-Based Learning in Science Education.
_Education Sciences, 13_(11), 1113.
[https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111113.](https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111113.)
Konu Kadirhanogullari, M., & Ozay Kose, E. (2023). Project-Based Learning in Science Education: A Bibliometric Network Analysis.
_International Journal on Studies in Education._,
_6_(1), 85–108.
[https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.200](https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.200)
**Classmate Two (Amy):**
Planning and instruction, while embracing problem-based learning, focus on students’ proposed solutions, align the curriculum, refine and reflect on hypotheses, and share solutions. Additionally, students can concentrate on a single content area or incorporate a multi-subject outcome. Learners engage with one another, connect to the real world, and apply their knowledge. The redesign of the curriculum model, while applying problem-based learning, is enhanced by utilizing standard alignment with student-centered activities. This allows students to feel comfortable sharing their work with peers in cooperative and collaborative groups, continually challenging their knowledge. Assessments through group discussions and real-time feedback, paired with the instructor's reflective prompts, support and align assessments in problem-based learning (Kelley et al., 2019). Formative assessments are crucial in designing the overall learning outcomes for students. Furthermore, evaluating artifacts, performance, scaffolding, and addressing learning outcomes with refinement is essential when designing problem-based learning assessments.
An example of a problem-based learning process to achieve a final product would reflect an open-ended question (Larmer, 2015). Next, refining and designing a problem statement occurs while working on possible solutions within a collaborative group. Using the potential solutions, students would begin self-reflection, instructor-guided problem-solving, and finally, share their findings. With this, the focus is on the final product expressed in writing rather than a model or tangible product. In addition, addressing the problem can involve independent learning and result in a final product intended for an audience. The driving question is part of the initial investigation or hypothesis that has been created. While students frame the learning with their questions, the learning experiences are extended through enrichment and investigations.
A teacher delivering direct instruction, students taking notes, and administering a test on the information would not form part of a problem-based learning instructional environment. As Chian et al. (2019) discussed, the model employed in a problem-based classroom involves exploring problems, generating solutions, engaging in discussions, conducting research, collaborating, reviewing and synthesizing information, evaluating and reflecting, receiving instructor coaching, and preparing a group product for an audience. The teacher must carefully plan the curriculum using a backward design, focusing on tasks, conditions (group/individual), and alignment. Additionally, outlining the assessment component in the planning process is crucial to the problem-based instructional model. Allowing time for implementing the entire process, including communication, critical thinking, reasoning, researching, and presentation with rubrics, is essential for the comprehensive problem-based instructional process. Traditional grades are not necessarily intended for assessments, and strategies are implemented by the instructor, collectively with the students, to explore learning since evaluations support learning in problem-based learning (Kelley et al., 2019).
**References**
Chian, M. M., Bridges, S.M., & Lo., E. C. (2019). The triple jump in problem-based learning: Unpacking principles and practices in designing assessment for curriculum alignment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- Based Learning, 13(2).
[https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1813.](https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1813.)
Kelley, K.W., Fowlin, J.J., Tawfik, A.A., & Anderson, M.C. (2019). The role of using formative assessments in problem-based learning: A health sciences education perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2).
[http://doi.org/10.7771/154-5015.1814.](http://doi.org/10.7771/154-5015.1814.)
Larmer, J. (2015, July, 13). Project-based learning vs. problem-based learning vs. X-BL. Edutopia.
[https://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-vs-pbl-vs-xbl-john-larmer.](https://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-vs-pbl-vs-xbl-john-larmer.)
**## W6730Replies.docx**
**Directions:** For each discussion below, you will individually post two replies to the posts of others of at least 150 words each. Each reply must incorporate at least one scholarly research article in current APA format. The source cited must have been published within the last five years.
As you participate in the Discussions in this course, remember to support your arguments with relevant research and evidence. Also, engage with your peers’ ideas by asking clarifying questions and offering constructive feedback.
**Classmate One (Sabrina):**
Project- based learning (PBL) and problem- based learning (PrBL) are two teaching methods that focus on real- world application. Both approaches help students develop critical thinking skills. However, they are different in how they are structured.
PBL involves students working on a project over time. The project usually has a clear goal and results in a final product, such as a model, presentation, or research paper. The teacher provides guidance while students explore the topic (Kadirhanogullari & Kose, 2023). In contrast, PrBL starts with an open- ended problem. Students must research, discuss, and develop their own solutions. There is no single correct answer, and teachers act as facilitators rather than direct instructors (Aidoo, 2023).
How would classroom planning and instruction need to change in order to fully capitalize on the strengths of problem- based learning?
To fully use problem- based learning, teachers need to change how they plan lessons. Instead of direct instruction, teachers should present real- world problems for students to solve. This requires a shift from a teacher- centered approach to student- led learning environment. Teachers must provide guiding questions and allow students to explore different solutions.
Collaboration is important in PrBL. Students should work in groups to share ideas and learn from each other. Technology can help with this process. Tools like Google Docs, discussion boards, and video conferencing allow students to collaborate effectively, even in online settings.
Assessment also needs to change. Instead of focusing on memorization, teachers should evaluate students based on their problem- solving skills. Rubrics can be used to measure how well students analyze problems, develop solutions, and explain their reasoning.
Using PrBL requires more flexibility in teaching. Students learn at different paces, so teachers should allow time for deeper exploration. This means moving away from strict schedules and letting students advance when they are ready. PrBL helps students develop critical thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. However, it requires changes in planning, instruction, and assessment. By making these adjustments, teachers can create a more engaging and effective learning environment (Aidoo, 2023).
References
Aidoo, B. (2023). Teacher Educators Experience Adopting Problem-Based Learning in Science Education.
_Education Sciences, 13_(11), 1113.
[https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111113.](https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111113.)
Konu Kadirhanogullari, M., & Ozay Kose, E. (2023). Project-Based Learning in Science Education: A Bibliometric Network Analysis.
_International Journal on Studies in Education._,
_6_(1), 85–108.
[https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.200](https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.200)
**Classmate Two (Amy):**
Planning and instruction, while embracing problem-based learning, focus on students’ proposed solutions, align the curriculum, refine and reflect on hypotheses, and share solutions. Additionally, students can concentrate on a single content area or incorporate a multi-subject outcome. Learners engage with one another, connect to the real world, and apply their knowledge. The redesign of the curriculum model, while applying problem-based learning, is enhanced by utilizing standard alignment with student-centered activities. This allows students to feel comfortable sharing their work with peers in cooperative and collaborative groups, continually challenging their knowledge. Assessments through group discussions and real-time feedback, paired with the instructor's reflective prompts, support and align assessments in problem-based learning (Kelley et al., 2019). Formative assessments are crucial in designing the overall learning outcomes for students. Furthermore, evaluating artifacts, performance, scaffolding, and addressing learning outcomes with refinement is essential when designing problem-based learning assessments.
An example of a problem-based learning process to achieve a final product would reflect an open-ended question (Larmer, 2015). Next, refining and designing a problem statement occurs while working on possible solutions within a collaborative group. Using the potential solutions, students would begin self-reflection, instructor-guided problem-solving, and finally, share their findings. With this, the focus is on the final product expressed in writing rather than a model or tangible product. In addition, addressing the problem can involve independent learning and result in a final product intended for an audience. The driving question is part of the initial investigation or hypothesis that has been created. While students frame the learning with their questions, the learning experiences are extended through enrichment and investigations.
A teacher delivering direct instruction, students taking notes, and administering a test on the information would not form part of a problem-based learning instructional environment. As Chian et al. (2019) discussed, the model employed in a problem-based classroom involves exploring problems, generating solutions, engaging in discussions, conducting research, collaborating, reviewing and synthesizing information, evaluating and reflecting, receiving instructor coaching, and preparing a group product for an audience. The teacher must carefully plan the curriculum using a backward design, focusing on tasks, conditions (group/individual), and alignment. Additionally, outlining the assessment component in the planning process is crucial to the problem-based instructional model. Allowing time for implementing the entire process, including communication, critical thinking, reasoning, researching, and presentation with rubrics, is essential for the comprehensive problem-based instructional process. Traditional grades are not necessarily intended for assessments, and strategies are implemented by the instructor, collectively with the students, to explore learning since evaluations support learning in problem-based learning (Kelley et al., 2019).
**References**
Chian, M. M., Bridges, S.M., & Lo., E. C. (2019). The triple jump in problem-based learning: Unpacking principles and practices in designing assessment for curriculum alignment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- Based Learning, 13(2).
[https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1813.](https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1813.)
Kelley, K.W., Fowlin, J.J., Tawfik, A.A., & Anderson, M.C. (2019). The role of using formative assessments in problem-based learning: A health sciences education perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2).
[http://doi.org/10.7771/154-5015.1814.](http://doi.org/10.7771/154-5015.1814.)
Larmer, J. (2015, July, 13). Project-based learning vs. problem-based learning vs. X-BL. Edutopia.
[https://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-vs-pbl-vs-xbl-john-larmer.](https://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-vs-pbl-vs-xbl-john-larmer.)