Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ThePsychiatricEvaluationandEvidence.docx **## ThePsychiatricEvaluationandEvidence.docx** The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/the-psychiatric-evaluation-and-evidence-based-rating-scales-20888747)Assessme…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ThePsychiatricEvaluationandEvidence.docx

    **## ThePsychiatricEvaluationandEvidence.docx**

    The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/the-psychiatric-evaluation-and-evidence-based-rating-scales-20888747)Assessment tools have two primary purposes: 1) to measure illness and diagnose clients, and 2) to measure a client’s response to treatment. Often, you will find that multiple assessment tools are designed to measure the same condition or response. Not all tools, however, are appropriate for use in all clinical situations. You must consider the strengths and weaknesses of each tool to select the appropriate assessment tool for your client. For this Discussion, as you examine the assessment tool assigned to you by the Course Instructor, consider its use in psychotherapy.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/161233/modules/items/6341207)

    To Prepare:

    · Review this week's Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide regarding psychiatric assessment and diagnosis.

    · Consider the elements of the psychiatric interview, history, and examination.

    · Consider the assessment tool assigned to you by the Course Instructor.

    By Day 3 of Week 2

    **Post** a brief explanation of three important components of the psychiatric interview and why you consider these elements important. Explain the psychometric properties of the rating scale you were assigned. Explain when it is appropriate to use this rating scale with clients during the psychiatric interview and how the scale is helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

    Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## ThePsychiatricEvaluationandEvidence.docx**

    The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/the-psychiatric-evaluation-and-evidence-based-rating-scales-20888747)Assessment tools have two primary purposes: 1) to measure illness and diagnose clients, and 2) to measure a client’s response to treatment. Often, you will find that multiple assessment tools are designed to measure the same condition or response. Not all tools, however, are appropriate for use in all clinical situations. You must consider the strengths and weaknesses of each tool to select the appropriate assessment tool for your client. For this Discussion, as you examine the assessment tool assigned to you by the Course Instructor, consider its use in psychotherapy.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/161233/modules/items/6341207)

    To Prepare:

    · Review this week's Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide regarding psychiatric assessment and diagnosis.

    · Consider the elements of the psychiatric interview, history, and examination.

    · Consider the assessment tool assigned to you by the Course Instructor.

    By Day 3 of Week 2

    **Post** a brief explanation of three important components of the psychiatric interview and why you consider these elements important. Explain the psychometric properties of the rating scale you were assigned. Explain when it is appropriate to use this rating scale with clients during the psychiatric interview and how the scale is helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

    Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] The development of nursing Knowledge

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The development of nursing knowledge is an ongoing process. Discuss the case for the ongoing development and use of nursing grand theories and conversely, make a case for the obsolescence of nursing grand theories for today’s practice and research. Please include 400 words in your initial post with …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The development of nursing knowledge is an ongoing process. Discuss the case for the ongoing development and use of nursing grand theories and conversely, make a case for the obsolescence of nursing grand theories for today’s practice and research.

    Please include 400 words in your initial post with two scholarly articles.

    References in APA format . Turnitin 30 % Max

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] see below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering see below.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Crmj

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Need help – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Need help

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] final

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (4)** – ## milestone1114.docx – ## MilestoneOneRevised1.docx – MilestoneThreeMethodologyDesignandData1.docx – final9snhu.docx **## milestone1114.docx** 1 #### **Milestone One: Resource Collection** Laporsha Terrell PSY-790-10178-M01 Capstone in Psychology Elizabeth Babskie Janu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (4)**

    – ## milestone1114.docx

    – ## MilestoneOneRevised1.docx

    – MilestoneThreeMethodologyDesignandData1.docx
    – final9snhu.docx

    **## milestone1114.docx**

    1

    #### **Milestone One: Resource Collection** Laporsha Terrell PSY-790-10178-M01 Capstone in Psychology Elizabeth Babskie January 15, 2025 **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    #### Research Topic

    The proposed research topic for my capstone project is: "The Influence of Trauma in Early Childhood on the Mental Health and Development of Adolescents." This research seeks to explore the long-term effects of early trauma, including abuse, neglect, and exposure to violence, on adolescents' emotional regulation, cognitive development, and social functioning. Additionally, it aims to evaluate interventions designed to mitigate the effects of early trauma and build resilience.

    #### Research Questions

    1. What psychosocial residuals of early trauma persist into adolescence?

    2. How does early trauma affect academic performance and social relationships during adolescence?

    3. Which interventions are most effective in fostering resilience among adolescents who experienced early trauma?

    4. How can schools and community organizations design supportive environments for these adolescents?

    #### Importance of the Topic

    Childhood trauma is a significant public health concern with long-term consequences that extend into adolescence and adulthood. Studies consistently link early trauma to mental health challenges, including depression, anxiety, and PTSD, as well as impaired academic and social functioning. Despite its prevalence, interventions for adolescents remain underdeveloped, particularly those addressing resilience-building. This research is vital to improving our understanding of trauma's effects and creating evidence-based interventions to support affected individuals.

    #### Literature Review

    The following peer-reviewed resources support this research and provide insights into the topic.

    1. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998).
    Citation: Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
    Summary: This foundational study established the ACE framework, highlighting the long-term impacts of childhood trauma on mental and physical health. The study emphasizes the cumulative effect of adverse experiences on psychological outcomes, laying the groundwork for understanding trauma's role in adolescence.
    Evaluation: The methodology, including its large sample size, enhances the study's credibility. Its relevance to this research lies in its comprehensive exploration of early trauma's effects, but it focuses more on adult outcomes than adolescent development.

    2. Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014).
    Citation: Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2106–2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)
    Summary: This article examines how ACEs affect school engagement and overall health, emphasizing the protective role of resilience. It highlights strategies to foster resilience in children and adolescents to mitigate trauma's effects on education and social behavior.
    Evaluation: The authors present strong, evidence-based arguments supported by national survey data. While the focus on school engagement aligns well with the proposed research, the article provides limited detail on specific interventions.

    3. Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    Citation: Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students. Contemporary School Psychology, 20(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8
    Summary: This article introduces trauma-informed education as a strategy to improve outcomes for students with adverse childhood experiences. It focuses on integrating resilience-building practices, such as mindfulness and positive psychology, within educational settings.
    Evaluation: The study's strength lies in its practical application of trauma-informed practices within schools. However, the lack of quantitative data limits the generalizability of the findings.

    4. Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., van Wesel, F., et al. (2014).
    Citation: Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204(5), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227
    Summary: This meta-analysis provides an overview of PTSD prevalence in children and adolescents exposed to trauma. It highlights risk factors, including the type and timing of trauma, and underscores the importance of early interventions.
    Evaluation: The present study crystallizes several studies' findings into concrete conclusions in the light of methodological rigor. Highly relevant: though focused on PTSD, other psychiatric outcomes, including depression and anxiety disorders, were not addressed.

    5. Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    Citation: Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487
    Summary: This review stipulates the effectiveness of CBT among traumatized children and adolescents; further, it outlines various barriers in implementing CBT through schools and local communities.

    Evaluation: The authors give an extensive review of the efficiency of the CBT, hence being a good source in designing the intervention. On critical analysis, this article has failed to address another approach method, for example, mindfulness and family-based interventions.

    **Analysis of Sources**

    Each source adds to different information that contributes to the research topic:

    · Felitti et al. on the lifetime effect of trauma,

    · building resilience and engagement in school by Bethell et al.

    · to fit the educational approach of the research, trauma-informed practices which can be explicitly implemented into schools by Brunzell et al.

    · Alisic et al. provide solid data regarding PTSD prevalence to back up the importance of early intervention.

    · Bryant & Deane discuss the debate evidence-based interventions informing practical strategies in developing resilience.

    **Conclusion**:

    These will add cumulatively to the knowledge base on early trauma effects and go a long way in helping to inform interventions for adolescents. The three resources above, therefore, provide evidence to inform the inclusion of strategies in resilience building, trauma-informed education, and cognitive behavioral approach. Synthesizing the findings, this proposed research is aimed at addressing the gaps in current practice and actionable solutions to support traumatized adolescents.

    References

    Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., van Wesel, F., et al. (2014). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204(5), 335–340.
    [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227](https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227)

    Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014).
    _Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience._ _Health Affairs_, 33(12), 2106–2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)

    Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    _Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students._ _Contemporary School Psychology_, 20(1), 63–83.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8)

    Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    _Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation._ _Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry_, 63(2), 134–147.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487)

    Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998).
    _Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study._ _American Journal of Preventive Medicine_, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8

    **## MilestoneOneRevised1.docx**

    2

    **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    **PSY-790-10178-M01**

    **Capstone in Psychology**

    **Elizabeth Babskie**

    **January 31, 2025**

    **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    **Overview of Research**

    Early childhood traumatic experiences including abuse, neglect, and witnessing violence and its impact on emotional, cognitive, and social development in adolescents will be the proposed topic of research. The research will also explore how interventions can foster resilience in adolescents facing these challenges, particularly within school environments. The key areas of interest involve the psychosocial effects of early trauma, the impact on academic performance, social relationships, and effective interventions.

    **Research Questions**

    The research questions proposed are as follows:

    1. What psychosocial residuals of early trauma persist in adolescence?

    2. Does trauma early affect later academic and social performance in the adolescent period?

    3. Which interventions most effectively foster resilience in adolescents who have been traumatized early in their lives?

    4. How can supportive environments for these adolescents be designed by schools and community organizations?

    These questions have been identified at the core of the proposed research, which can help bridge gaps between trauma theory and intervention practices for adolescents.

    **Evaluation of Topic Fit to the Field of Psychology**

    The topic of review is trauma experienced during early childhood and its repercussions in later adolescent years. Trauma psychology generally falls under developmental psychology. Scientific evidence has already demonstrated that experiences of trauma significantly alter emotional modulation, cognitive maturation, and social functioning early in life. These changes contribute mightily toward structuring how well adolescents perform mental health, or disorders concerning them, for example, symptoms indicating PTSD, major depression, or anxiety problems. This study seeks to help build in its own unique area of resilient development interventions through schooling and at communities and elaborate on what psychological mechanisms undergo these and thereby apply interventions when the developing world needs care support.

    **Synthesis of Previous Scholarly Research Findings**

    The literature review draws from several critical studies including Felitti et al. (1998) who study foundational in trauma research, establishing the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) framework and demonstrating the long-term effects of childhood trauma on physical and mental health outcomes. The study, however, emphasizes adult outcomes more than adolescent development, indicating a gap that the research aims to address by focusing on the adolescent phase. Additionally, Bethell et al. (2014) emphasizes the role of resilience in mitigating the effects of ACEs. It links early trauma to poor school engagement and overall health. Although Bethell et al. (2014) provide valuable insights into resilience, their study falls short in detailing specific interventions, which this research intends to explore further, particularly within school environments.

    Brunzell et al. (2016) introduce trauma-informed education and how integrating positive psychology within school settings can improve outcomes for traumatized students. While the study provides practical insights, its lack of quantitative data limits its ability to generalize findings across diverse settings, a gap this research seeks to fill. Alisic et al. (2014) focus on PTSD prevalence in children and adolescents with trauma exposure, identifying risk factors, and advocating for early interventions. This study, however, does not incorporate other important mental health issues among children, such as depression and anxiety, which this research is trying to present. Whereas Bryant and Deane (2022) conducted a comprehensive review of cognitive-behavioral treatments for trauma-related disorders among children and adolescents, the key focus still lies in the area of CBT. No consideration of other therapeutic approaches has been made, such as mindfulness and family-based interventions that could be highly relevant when considering treatment of trauma within a broader approach.

    **Comparison and Evaluation of Studies**

    A comparison of these studies indicates that, while they provide a clear understanding of early trauma and its association with mental health, each has some limitations:

    · While the studies by Felitti et al. (1998) and Bethell et al. (2014) are based on long-term trauma, the interventions aimed at adolescents are only minimally addressed.

    · Brunzell et al. (2016) present a promising model of trauma-informed education; however, the absence of quantitative evidence limits the generalization of their findings.

    · Alisic et al. (2014) study and also Bryant and Deane (2022) literature were quite enlightening on interventions, such as CBT; however, there was a shortage regarding the variety of interventions discussed. This paper will add to current information by considering other kinds of interventions, such as family-based therapy and mindfulness, which can probably represent more holistic approaches in adolescents.

    **Addressing Research Gaps**

    A critical gap identified in the literature is the insufficient exploration of specific interventions aimed at fostering resilience in adolescents, especially within educational contexts. While resilience is often discussed in theoretical terms, there is a lack of detailed research on how resilience-building practices can be integrated into school environments. Additionally, most studies focus on PTSD as the primary mental health issue resulting from childhood trauma, with less emphasis on other outcomes like depression, anxiety, or social withdrawal.

    **The Research will Fill this Gap by:**

    · Exploring how different interventions (including CBT, mindfulness, family therapy) can be implemented in schools to support adolescents.

    · Investigating how schools and community organizations can create trauma-informed environments that foster resilience.

    · Expanding the focus to include a broader range of mental health challenges, not just PTSD.

    **Contribution of Existing Research to Real-World Problems**

    Existing research on childhood trauma has significant implications for the general public. By identifying the long-term effects of trauma, these studies emphasize the need for early intervention to prevent the development of serious mental health issues in adolescents. There is an increasing recognition of the importance of trauma-informed practices both at schools and in other community venues to support vulnerable youth.

    This research will help further this effort by providing actionable insights into how schools can implement effective interventions to mitigate the effects of trauma. By focusing on resilience-building strategies, the study aims to offer practical solutions that can be adopted by educational institutions and community organizations to support vulnerable adolescents. This research is vital for public health, education, and social services, as it directly addresses the well-being of a high-risk population and offers evidence-based strategies for improvement.

    **Organizing and Aligning the Literature Review to the Message**

    The literature review should be logically organized to flow from identifying the research topic through synthesizing previous work, identifying research gaps, and culminating in implications for this study. This clear path includes the following general form for this type of literature review paper:

    1.
    **Introduction**: A brief introduction to the research topic and questions.

    2.
    **Literature Review**: A summary of prior research regarding how trauma impacts adolescent development and intervention.

    3.
    **Gap Identification**: A presentation of the shortcomings of the available research and what gaps this research will attempt to fill.

    4.
    **Proposed Research Contribution**: Identifying how the research will fill these gaps and its contribution to practical applications.

    5.
    **Conclusion**: A summary of the synthesis of the literature, and the re-engagement with the research questions and the overall argument.

    **Synthesizing Conclusion**

    The literature review demonstrates a critical need for more focused research on interventions that build resilience in adolescents affected by early trauma. While existing studies have established the pervasive impacts of trauma, particularly regarding PTSD, they lack detailed exploration of intervention methods in educational settings. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring various therapeutic interventions, such as CBT, mindfulness, and family-based therapies, and evaluating their effectiveness in supporting adolescents in school environments. By synthesizing the existing literature and proposing a path forward, the study will contribute valuable insights to the field of psychology, particularly in improving mental health outcomes for adolescents facing the consequences of early trauma.

    Bottom of Form

    References

    Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., Van Wesel, F., Larsen, S. E., Hafstad, G. S., Hassanpour, K., & Smid, G. E. (2014). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: meta-analysis.
    _The British Journal of Psychiatry_,
    _204_(5), 335-340.
    [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227](https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227)

    Bethell, C. D., New check, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014). Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience.
    _Health affairs_,
    _33_(12), 2106-2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)

    Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    _Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students._ _Contemporary School Psychology_, 20(1), 63–83.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8)

    Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    _Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation._ _Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry_, 63(2), 134–147.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487)

    Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study.
    _American journal of preventive medicine_,
    _14_(4), 245-258.
    [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext](https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext)

    **MilestoneThreeMethodologyDesignandData1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/milestonethreemethodologydesignanddata1-docx)

    **final9snhu.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/final9snhu-docx)

    **final9snhu.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/final9snhu-docx)

    **## milestone1114.docx**

    1

    #### **Milestone One: Resource Collection** Laporsha Terrell PSY-790-10178-M01 Capstone in Psychology Elizabeth Babskie January 15, 2025 **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    #### Research Topic

    The proposed research topic for my capstone project is: "The Influence of Trauma in Early Childhood on the Mental Health and Development of Adolescents." This research seeks to explore the long-term effects of early trauma, including abuse, neglect, and exposure to violence, on adolescents' emotional regulation, cognitive development, and social functioning. Additionally, it aims to evaluate interventions designed to mitigate the effects of early trauma and build resilience.

    #### Research Questions

    1. What psychosocial residuals of early trauma persist into adolescence?

    2. How does early trauma affect academic performance and social relationships during adolescence?

    3. Which interventions are most effective in fostering resilience among adolescents who experienced early trauma?

    4. How can schools and community organizations design supportive environments for these adolescents?

    #### Importance of the Topic

    Childhood trauma is a significant public health concern with long-term consequences that extend into adolescence and adulthood. Studies consistently link early trauma to mental health challenges, including depression, anxiety, and PTSD, as well as impaired academic and social functioning. Despite its prevalence, interventions for adolescents remain underdeveloped, particularly those addressing resilience-building. This research is vital to improving our understanding of trauma's effects and creating evidence-based interventions to support affected individuals.

    #### Literature Review

    The following peer-reviewed resources support this research and provide insights into the topic.

    1. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998).
    Citation: Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
    Summary: This foundational study established the ACE framework, highlighting the long-term impacts of childhood trauma on mental and physical health. The study emphasizes the cumulative effect of adverse experiences on psychological outcomes, laying the groundwork for understanding trauma's role in adolescence.
    Evaluation: The methodology, including its large sample size, enhances the study's credibility. Its relevance to this research lies in its comprehensive exploration of early trauma's effects, but it focuses more on adult outcomes than adolescent development.

    2. Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014).
    Citation: Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2106–2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)
    Summary: This article examines how ACEs affect school engagement and overall health, emphasizing the protective role of resilience. It highlights strategies to foster resilience in children and adolescents to mitigate trauma's effects on education and social behavior.
    Evaluation: The authors present strong, evidence-based arguments supported by national survey data. While the focus on school engagement aligns well with the proposed research, the article provides limited detail on specific interventions.

    3. Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    Citation: Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students. Contemporary School Psychology, 20(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8
    Summary: This article introduces trauma-informed education as a strategy to improve outcomes for students with adverse childhood experiences. It focuses on integrating resilience-building practices, such as mindfulness and positive psychology, within educational settings.
    Evaluation: The study's strength lies in its practical application of trauma-informed practices within schools. However, the lack of quantitative data limits the generalizability of the findings.

    4. Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., van Wesel, F., et al. (2014).
    Citation: Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204(5), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227
    Summary: This meta-analysis provides an overview of PTSD prevalence in children and adolescents exposed to trauma. It highlights risk factors, including the type and timing of trauma, and underscores the importance of early interventions.
    Evaluation: The present study crystallizes several studies' findings into concrete conclusions in the light of methodological rigor. Highly relevant: though focused on PTSD, other psychiatric outcomes, including depression and anxiety disorders, were not addressed.

    5. Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    Citation: Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487
    Summary: This review stipulates the effectiveness of CBT among traumatized children and adolescents; further, it outlines various barriers in implementing CBT through schools and local communities.

    Evaluation: The authors give an extensive review of the efficiency of the CBT, hence being a good source in designing the intervention. On critical analysis, this article has failed to address another approach method, for example, mindfulness and family-based interventions.

    **Analysis of Sources**

    Each source adds to different information that contributes to the research topic:

    · Felitti et al. on the lifetime effect of trauma,

    · building resilience and engagement in school by Bethell et al.

    · to fit the educational approach of the research, trauma-informed practices which can be explicitly implemented into schools by Brunzell et al.

    · Alisic et al. provide solid data regarding PTSD prevalence to back up the importance of early intervention.

    · Bryant & Deane discuss the debate evidence-based interventions informing practical strategies in developing resilience.

    **Conclusion**:

    These will add cumulatively to the knowledge base on early trauma effects and go a long way in helping to inform interventions for adolescents. The three resources above, therefore, provide evidence to inform the inclusion of strategies in resilience building, trauma-informed education, and cognitive behavioral approach. Synthesizing the findings, this proposed research is aimed at addressing the gaps in current practice and actionable solutions to support traumatized adolescents.

    References

    Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., van Wesel, F., et al. (2014). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204(5), 335–340.
    [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227](https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227)

    Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014).
    _Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience._ _Health Affairs_, 33(12), 2106–2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)

    Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    _Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students._ _Contemporary School Psychology_, 20(1), 63–83.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8)

    Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    _Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation._ _Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry_, 63(2), 134–147.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487)

    Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998).
    _Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study._ _American Journal of Preventive Medicine_, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8

    **## MilestoneOneRevised1.docx**

    2

    **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    **PSY-790-10178-M01**

    **Capstone in Psychology**

    **Elizabeth Babskie**

    **January 31, 2025**

    **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    **Overview of Research**

    Early childhood traumatic experiences including abuse, neglect, and witnessing violence and its impact on emotional, cognitive, and social development in adolescents will be the proposed topic of research. The research will also explore how interventions can foster resilience in adolescents facing these challenges, particularly within school environments. The key areas of interest involve the psychosocial effects of early trauma, the impact on academic performance, social relationships, and effective interventions.

    **Research Questions**

    The research questions proposed are as follows:

    1. What psychosocial residuals of early trauma persist in adolescence?

    2. Does trauma early affect later academic and social performance in the adolescent period?

    3. Which interventions most effectively foster resilience in adolescents who have been traumatized early in their lives?

    4. How can supportive environments for these adolescents be designed by schools and community organizations?

    These questions have been identified at the core of the proposed research, which can help bridge gaps between trauma theory and intervention practices for adolescents.

    **Evaluation of Topic Fit to the Field of Psychology**

    The topic of review is trauma experienced during early childhood and its repercussions in later adolescent years. Trauma psychology generally falls under developmental psychology. Scientific evidence has already demonstrated that experiences of trauma significantly alter emotional modulation, cognitive maturation, and social functioning early in life. These changes contribute mightily toward structuring how well adolescents perform mental health, or disorders concerning them, for example, symptoms indicating PTSD, major depression, or anxiety problems. This study seeks to help build in its own unique area of resilient development interventions through schooling and at communities and elaborate on what psychological mechanisms undergo these and thereby apply interventions when the developing world needs care support.

    **Synthesis of Previous Scholarly Research Findings**

    The literature review draws from several critical studies including Felitti et al. (1998) who study foundational in trauma research, establishing the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) framework and demonstrating the long-term effects of childhood trauma on physical and mental health outcomes. The study, however, emphasizes adult outcomes more than adolescent development, indicating a gap that the research aims to address by focusing on the adolescent phase. Additionally, Bethell et al. (2014) emphasizes the role of resilience in mitigating the effects of ACEs. It links early trauma to poor school engagement and overall health. Although Bethell et al. (2014) provide valuable insights into resilience, their study falls short in detailing specific interventions, which this research intends to explore further, particularly within school environments.

    Brunzell et al. (2016) introduce trauma-informed education and how integrating positive psychology within school settings can improve outcomes for traumatized students. While the study provides practical insights, its lack of quantitative data limits its ability to generalize findings across diverse settings, a gap this research seeks to fill. Alisic et al. (2014) focus on PTSD prevalence in children and adolescents with trauma exposure, identifying risk factors, and advocating for early interventions. This study, however, does not incorporate other important mental health issues among children, such as depression and anxiety, which this research is trying to present. Whereas Bryant and Deane (2022) conducted a comprehensive review of cognitive-behavioral treatments for trauma-related disorders among children and adolescents, the key focus still lies in the area of CBT. No consideration of other therapeutic approaches has been made, such as mindfulness and family-based interventions that could be highly relevant when considering treatment of trauma within a broader approach.

    **Comparison and Evaluation of Studies**

    A comparison of these studies indicates that, while they provide a clear understanding of early trauma and its association with mental health, each has some limitations:

    · While the studies by Felitti et al. (1998) and Bethell et al. (2014) are based on long-term trauma, the interventions aimed at adolescents are only minimally addressed.

    · Brunzell et al. (2016) present a promising model of trauma-informed education; however, the absence of quantitative evidence limits the generalization of their findings.

    · Alisic et al. (2014) study and also Bryant and Deane (2022) literature were quite enlightening on interventions, such as CBT; however, there was a shortage regarding the variety of interventions discussed. This paper will add to current information by considering other kinds of interventions, such as family-based therapy and mindfulness, which can probably represent more holistic approaches in adolescents.

    **Addressing Research Gaps**

    A critical gap identified in the literature is the insufficient exploration of specific interventions aimed at fostering resilience in adolescents, especially within educational contexts. While resilience is often discussed in theoretical terms, there is a lack of detailed research on how resilience-building practices can be integrated into school environments. Additionally, most studies focus on PTSD as the primary mental health issue resulting from childhood trauma, with less emphasis on other outcomes like depression, anxiety, or social withdrawal.

    **The Research will Fill this Gap by:**

    · Exploring how different interventions (including CBT, mindfulness, family therapy) can be implemented in schools to support adolescents.

    · Investigating how schools and community organizations can create trauma-informed environments that foster resilience.

    · Expanding the focus to include a broader range of mental health challenges, not just PTSD.

    **Contribution of Existing Research to Real-World Problems**

    Existing research on childhood trauma has significant implications for the general public. By identifying the long-term effects of trauma, these studies emphasize the need for early intervention to prevent the development of serious mental health issues in adolescents. There is an increasing recognition of the importance of trauma-informed practices both at schools and in other community venues to support vulnerable youth.

    This research will help further this effort by providing actionable insights into how schools can implement effective interventions to mitigate the effects of trauma. By focusing on resilience-building strategies, the study aims to offer practical solutions that can be adopted by educational institutions and community organizations to support vulnerable adolescents. This research is vital for public health, education, and social services, as it directly addresses the well-being of a high-risk population and offers evidence-based strategies for improvement.

    **Organizing and Aligning the Literature Review to the Message**

    The literature review should be logically organized to flow from identifying the research topic through synthesizing previous work, identifying research gaps, and culminating in implications for this study. This clear path includes the following general form for this type of literature review paper:

    1.
    **Introduction**: A brief introduction to the research topic and questions.

    2.
    **Literature Review**: A summary of prior research regarding how trauma impacts adolescent development and intervention.

    3.
    **Gap Identification**: A presentation of the shortcomings of the available research and what gaps this research will attempt to fill.

    4.
    **Proposed Research Contribution**: Identifying how the research will fill these gaps and its contribution to practical applications.

    5.
    **Conclusion**: A summary of the synthesis of the literature, and the re-engagement with the research questions and the overall argument.

    **Synthesizing Conclusion**

    The literature review demonstrates a critical need for more focused research on interventions that build resilience in adolescents affected by early trauma. While existing studies have established the pervasive impacts of trauma, particularly regarding PTSD, they lack detailed exploration of intervention methods in educational settings. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring various therapeutic interventions, such as CBT, mindfulness, and family-based therapies, and evaluating their effectiveness in supporting adolescents in school environments. By synthesizing the existing literature and proposing a path forward, the study will contribute valuable insights to the field of psychology, particularly in improving mental health outcomes for adolescents facing the consequences of early trauma.

    Bottom of Form

    References

    Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., Van Wesel, F., Larsen, S. E., Hafstad, G. S., Hassanpour, K., & Smid, G. E. (2014). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: meta-analysis.
    _The British Journal of Psychiatry_,
    _204_(5), 335-340.
    [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227](https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227)

    Bethell, C. D., New check, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014). Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience.
    _Health affairs_,
    _33_(12), 2106-2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)

    Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    _Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students._ _Contemporary School Psychology_, 20(1), 63–83.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8)

    Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    _Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation._ _Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry_, 63(2), 134–147.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487)

    Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study.
    _American journal of preventive medicine_,
    _14_(4), 245-258.
    [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext](https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext)

    **MilestoneThreeMethodologyDesignandData1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/milestonethreemethodologydesignanddata1-docx)

    **final9snhu.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/final9snhu-docx)

    **## milestone1114.docx**

    1

    #### **Milestone One: Resource Collection** Laporsha Terrell PSY-790-10178-M01 Capstone in Psychology Elizabeth Babskie January 15, 2025 **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    #### Research Topic

    The proposed research topic for my capstone project is: "The Influence of Trauma in Early Childhood on the Mental Health and Development of Adolescents." This research seeks to explore the long-term effects of early trauma, including abuse, neglect, and exposure to violence, on adolescents' emotional regulation, cognitive development, and social functioning. Additionally, it aims to evaluate interventions designed to mitigate the effects of early trauma and build resilience.

    #### Research Questions

    1. What psychosocial residuals of early trauma persist into adolescence?

    2. How does early trauma affect academic performance and social relationships during adolescence?

    3. Which interventions are most effective in fostering resilience among adolescents who experienced early trauma?

    4. How can schools and community organizations design supportive environments for these adolescents?

    #### Importance of the Topic

    Childhood trauma is a significant public health concern with long-term consequences that extend into adolescence and adulthood. Studies consistently link early trauma to mental health challenges, including depression, anxiety, and PTSD, as well as impaired academic and social functioning. Despite its prevalence, interventions for adolescents remain underdeveloped, particularly those addressing resilience-building. This research is vital to improving our understanding of trauma's effects and creating evidence-based interventions to support affected individuals.

    #### Literature Review

    The following peer-reviewed resources support this research and provide insights into the topic.

    1. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998).
    Citation: Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
    Summary: This foundational study established the ACE framework, highlighting the long-term impacts of childhood trauma on mental and physical health. The study emphasizes the cumulative effect of adverse experiences on psychological outcomes, laying the groundwork for understanding trauma's role in adolescence.
    Evaluation: The methodology, including its large sample size, enhances the study's credibility. Its relevance to this research lies in its comprehensive exploration of early trauma's effects, but it focuses more on adult outcomes than adolescent development.

    2. Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014).
    Citation: Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2106–2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)
    Summary: This article examines how ACEs affect school engagement and overall health, emphasizing the protective role of resilience. It highlights strategies to foster resilience in children and adolescents to mitigate trauma's effects on education and social behavior.
    Evaluation: The authors present strong, evidence-based arguments supported by national survey data. While the focus on school engagement aligns well with the proposed research, the article provides limited detail on specific interventions.

    3. Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    Citation: Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students. Contemporary School Psychology, 20(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8
    Summary: This article introduces trauma-informed education as a strategy to improve outcomes for students with adverse childhood experiences. It focuses on integrating resilience-building practices, such as mindfulness and positive psychology, within educational settings.
    Evaluation: The study's strength lies in its practical application of trauma-informed practices within schools. However, the lack of quantitative data limits the generalizability of the findings.

    4. Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., van Wesel, F., et al. (2014).
    Citation: Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204(5), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227
    Summary: This meta-analysis provides an overview of PTSD prevalence in children and adolescents exposed to trauma. It highlights risk factors, including the type and timing of trauma, and underscores the importance of early interventions.
    Evaluation: The present study crystallizes several studies' findings into concrete conclusions in the light of methodological rigor. Highly relevant: though focused on PTSD, other psychiatric outcomes, including depression and anxiety disorders, were not addressed.

    5. Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    Citation: Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487
    Summary: This review stipulates the effectiveness of CBT among traumatized children and adolescents; further, it outlines various barriers in implementing CBT through schools and local communities.

    Evaluation: The authors give an extensive review of the efficiency of the CBT, hence being a good source in designing the intervention. On critical analysis, this article has failed to address another approach method, for example, mindfulness and family-based interventions.

    **Analysis of Sources**

    Each source adds to different information that contributes to the research topic:

    · Felitti et al. on the lifetime effect of trauma,

    · building resilience and engagement in school by Bethell et al.

    · to fit the educational approach of the research, trauma-informed practices which can be explicitly implemented into schools by Brunzell et al.

    · Alisic et al. provide solid data regarding PTSD prevalence to back up the importance of early intervention.

    · Bryant & Deane discuss the debate evidence-based interventions informing practical strategies in developing resilience.

    **Conclusion**:

    These will add cumulatively to the knowledge base on early trauma effects and go a long way in helping to inform interventions for adolescents. The three resources above, therefore, provide evidence to inform the inclusion of strategies in resilience building, trauma-informed education, and cognitive behavioral approach. Synthesizing the findings, this proposed research is aimed at addressing the gaps in current practice and actionable solutions to support traumatized adolescents.

    References

    Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., van Wesel, F., et al. (2014). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204(5), 335–340.
    [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227](https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227)

    Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014).
    _Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience._ _Health Affairs_, 33(12), 2106–2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)

    Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    _Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students._ _Contemporary School Psychology_, 20(1), 63–83.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8)

    Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    _Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation._ _Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry_, 63(2), 134–147.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487)

    Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998).
    _Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study._ _American Journal of Preventive Medicine_, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8

    **## MilestoneOneRevised1.docx**

    2

    **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    **PSY-790-10178-M01**

    **Capstone in Psychology**

    **Elizabeth Babskie**

    **January 31, 2025**

    **Milestone One: Resource Collection**

    **Overview of Research**

    Early childhood traumatic experiences including abuse, neglect, and witnessing violence and its impact on emotional, cognitive, and social development in adolescents will be the proposed topic of research. The research will also explore how interventions can foster resilience in adolescents facing these challenges, particularly within school environments. The key areas of interest involve the psychosocial effects of early trauma, the impact on academic performance, social relationships, and effective interventions.

    **Research Questions**

    The research questions proposed are as follows:

    1. What psychosocial residuals of early trauma persist in adolescence?

    2. Does trauma early affect later academic and social performance in the adolescent period?

    3. Which interventions most effectively foster resilience in adolescents who have been traumatized early in their lives?

    4. How can supportive environments for these adolescents be designed by schools and community organizations?

    These questions have been identified at the core of the proposed research, which can help bridge gaps between trauma theory and intervention practices for adolescents.

    **Evaluation of Topic Fit to the Field of Psychology**

    The topic of review is trauma experienced during early childhood and its repercussions in later adolescent years. Trauma psychology generally falls under developmental psychology. Scientific evidence has already demonstrated that experiences of trauma significantly alter emotional modulation, cognitive maturation, and social functioning early in life. These changes contribute mightily toward structuring how well adolescents perform mental health, or disorders concerning them, for example, symptoms indicating PTSD, major depression, or anxiety problems. This study seeks to help build in its own unique area of resilient development interventions through schooling and at communities and elaborate on what psychological mechanisms undergo these and thereby apply interventions when the developing world needs care support.

    **Synthesis of Previous Scholarly Research Findings**

    The literature review draws from several critical studies including Felitti et al. (1998) who study foundational in trauma research, establishing the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) framework and demonstrating the long-term effects of childhood trauma on physical and mental health outcomes. The study, however, emphasizes adult outcomes more than adolescent development, indicating a gap that the research aims to address by focusing on the adolescent phase. Additionally, Bethell et al. (2014) emphasizes the role of resilience in mitigating the effects of ACEs. It links early trauma to poor school engagement and overall health. Although Bethell et al. (2014) provide valuable insights into resilience, their study falls short in detailing specific interventions, which this research intends to explore further, particularly within school environments.

    Brunzell et al. (2016) introduce trauma-informed education and how integrating positive psychology within school settings can improve outcomes for traumatized students. While the study provides practical insights, its lack of quantitative data limits its ability to generalize findings across diverse settings, a gap this research seeks to fill. Alisic et al. (2014) focus on PTSD prevalence in children and adolescents with trauma exposure, identifying risk factors, and advocating for early interventions. This study, however, does not incorporate other important mental health issues among children, such as depression and anxiety, which this research is trying to present. Whereas Bryant and Deane (2022) conducted a comprehensive review of cognitive-behavioral treatments for trauma-related disorders among children and adolescents, the key focus still lies in the area of CBT. No consideration of other therapeutic approaches has been made, such as mindfulness and family-based interventions that could be highly relevant when considering treatment of trauma within a broader approach.

    **Comparison and Evaluation of Studies**

    A comparison of these studies indicates that, while they provide a clear understanding of early trauma and its association with mental health, each has some limitations:

    · While the studies by Felitti et al. (1998) and Bethell et al. (2014) are based on long-term trauma, the interventions aimed at adolescents are only minimally addressed.

    · Brunzell et al. (2016) present a promising model of trauma-informed education; however, the absence of quantitative evidence limits the generalization of their findings.

    · Alisic et al. (2014) study and also Bryant and Deane (2022) literature were quite enlightening on interventions, such as CBT; however, there was a shortage regarding the variety of interventions discussed. This paper will add to current information by considering other kinds of interventions, such as family-based therapy and mindfulness, which can probably represent more holistic approaches in adolescents.

    **Addressing Research Gaps**

    A critical gap identified in the literature is the insufficient exploration of specific interventions aimed at fostering resilience in adolescents, especially within educational contexts. While resilience is often discussed in theoretical terms, there is a lack of detailed research on how resilience-building practices can be integrated into school environments. Additionally, most studies focus on PTSD as the primary mental health issue resulting from childhood trauma, with less emphasis on other outcomes like depression, anxiety, or social withdrawal.

    **The Research will Fill this Gap by:**

    · Exploring how different interventions (including CBT, mindfulness, family therapy) can be implemented in schools to support adolescents.

    · Investigating how schools and community organizations can create trauma-informed environments that foster resilience.

    · Expanding the focus to include a broader range of mental health challenges, not just PTSD.

    **Contribution of Existing Research to Real-World Problems**

    Existing research on childhood trauma has significant implications for the general public. By identifying the long-term effects of trauma, these studies emphasize the need for early intervention to prevent the development of serious mental health issues in adolescents. There is an increasing recognition of the importance of trauma-informed practices both at schools and in other community venues to support vulnerable youth.

    This research will help further this effort by providing actionable insights into how schools can implement effective interventions to mitigate the effects of trauma. By focusing on resilience-building strategies, the study aims to offer practical solutions that can be adopted by educational institutions and community organizations to support vulnerable adolescents. This research is vital for public health, education, and social services, as it directly addresses the well-being of a high-risk population and offers evidence-based strategies for improvement.

    **Organizing and Aligning the Literature Review to the Message**

    The literature review should be logically organized to flow from identifying the research topic through synthesizing previous work, identifying research gaps, and culminating in implications for this study. This clear path includes the following general form for this type of literature review paper:

    1.
    **Introduction**: A brief introduction to the research topic and questions.

    2.
    **Literature Review**: A summary of prior research regarding how trauma impacts adolescent development and intervention.

    3.
    **Gap Identification**: A presentation of the shortcomings of the available research and what gaps this research will attempt to fill.

    4.
    **Proposed Research Contribution**: Identifying how the research will fill these gaps and its contribution to practical applications.

    5.
    **Conclusion**: A summary of the synthesis of the literature, and the re-engagement with the research questions and the overall argument.

    **Synthesizing Conclusion**

    The literature review demonstrates a critical need for more focused research on interventions that build resilience in adolescents affected by early trauma. While existing studies have established the pervasive impacts of trauma, particularly regarding PTSD, they lack detailed exploration of intervention methods in educational settings. This research aims to bridge this gap by exploring various therapeutic interventions, such as CBT, mindfulness, and family-based therapies, and evaluating their effectiveness in supporting adolescents in school environments. By synthesizing the existing literature and proposing a path forward, the study will contribute valuable insights to the field of psychology, particularly in improving mental health outcomes for adolescents facing the consequences of early trauma.

    Bottom of Form

    References

    Alisic, E., Zalta, A. K., Van Wesel, F., Larsen, S. E., Hafstad, G. S., Hassanpour, K., & Smid, G. E. (2014). Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: meta-analysis.
    _The British Journal of Psychiatry_,
    _204_(5), 335-340.
    [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227](https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131227)

    Bethell, C. D., New check, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014). Adverse childhood experiences: Assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience.
    _Health affairs_,
    _33_(12), 2106-2115.
    [https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914](https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914)

    Brunzell, T., Stokes, H., & Waters, L. (2016).
    _Trauma-informed positive education: Using positive psychology to strengthen vulnerable students._ _Contemporary School Psychology_, 20(1), 63–83.
    [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0064-8)

    Bryant, R. A., & Deane, F. P. (2022).
    _Cognitive-behavioral interventions for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents: A review of efficacy and implementation._ _Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry_, 63(2), 134–147.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13487)

    Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study.
    _American journal of preventive medicine_,
    _14_(4), 245-258.
    [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext](https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext)

    **MilestoneThreeMethodologyDesignandData1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/milestonethreemethodologydesignanddata1-docx)

    **final9snhu.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/final9snhu-docx)

  • [Solved] History

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering History.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] HIS 101

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **One)The Prehistoric Period (Discussion Board Question #1, Unit One)** Discuss the prehistoric period in human existence. In your discussion, explain the major characteristics of the Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods in human existence, identifying the major characteristics associated with each. A…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **One)The Prehistoric Period (Discussion Board Question #1, Unit One)**

    Discuss the prehistoric period in human existence.  In your discussion, explain the major characteristics of the Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods in human existence, identifying the major characteristics associated with each.  Also, in your discussion, explain the transition between the Palaeolithic period and the Neolithic period; what were the major features of that transition/change?  Furthermore, and most importantly, explain the historical significance of the transition between the Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods.

    When answering the question, please be sure to document your sources (even if you just use the textbook), using the format (MLA, APA, Chicago, etc.) you're most familiar with.  Because the Discussion Board is somewhat informal, you're free to use the style you're most accustomed to using when documenting sources.  Additionally, please work to answer the question using **YOUR OWN WORDS** as much as possible.  Occasionally using direct quotations from the textbook is okay/acceptable, but most of your answer should be written in your own words (use of AI is NOT permitted).  It's really not your own work if you just copy your answer from the textbook (or other sources), even if you use quotation marks and citations, and will thus be scored accordingly.

    This question is worth a total of 6 points.  You will receive 5 points for answering the question (**fully**), and 1 additional point for posting a reply to a fellow student's answer (for a maximum total of 6 points).

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Mood Disorders

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## NRNPPRAC6635ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationTemplate.docx – ## NRNP_PRAC_6635_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.docx – AssessingandDiagnosingPatientsWithMoodDisorders.docx **## NRNPPRAC6635ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationTemplate.docx** **…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## NRNPPRAC6635ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationTemplate.docx

    – ## NRNP_PRAC_6635_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.docx

    – AssessingandDiagnosingPatientsWithMoodDisorders.docx

    **## NRNPPRAC6635ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationTemplate.docx**

    **NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template**

    **Week (enter week #): (Enter assignment title)**

    Student Name

    College of Nursing-PMHNP, Walden University

    NRNP 6635: Psychopathology and Diagnostic Reasoning

    Faculty Name

    Assignment Due Date

    **Subjective:**

    **CC** (chief complaint):

    **HPI**:

    **Past Psychiatric History**:

    ·
    **G** eneral Statement:

    ·
    **C** aregivers (if applicable):

    ·
    **H** ospitalizations:

    ·
    **M** edication trials:

    ·
    **P** sychotherapy or
    **P** revious Psychiatric Diagnosis:

    **Substance Current Use and History:**

    **Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History:**

    **Psychosocial History:**

    **Medical History:**

    ·
    **Current Medications**:

    ·
    **Allergies**:

    ·
    **Reproductive Hx**:

    **ROS**:

    · GENERAL:

    · HEENT:

    · SKIN:

    · CARDIOVASCULAR:

    · RESPIRATORY:

    · GASTROINTESTINAL:

    · GENITOURINARY:

    · NEUROLOGICAL:

    · MUSCULOSKELETAL:

    · HEMATOLOGIC:

    · LYMPHATICS:

    · ENDOCRINOLOGIC:

    **Objective:**

    **Physical exam:** if applicable

    **Diagnostic results**:

    **Assessment:**

    Mental Status Examination:

    Differential Diagnoses:

    Reflections:

    **References**

    © 2021 Walden University Page 1 of 3

    **## NRNP_PRAC_6635_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.docx**

    **NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar**

    INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY

    If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the
    Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template
    **_AND_** the Rubric
    as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. Below highlights by category are taken directly from the grading rubric for the assignment in Weeks 4–10. After reviewing the full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.

    In the
    Subjective section, provide:

    · Chief complaint

    · History of present illness (HPI)

    · Past psychiatric history

    · Medication trials and current medications

    · Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis

    · Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history

    · Allergies

    · ROS

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    In the
    Objective section, provide:

    · Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history

    · Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    In the
    Assessment section, provide:

    · Results of the mental status examination,
    _presented in paragraph form._

    · At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the
    _DSM-5-TR_ diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what
    _DSM-5-TR_ criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis.
    _Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case_.

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (
    **_demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment_**!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    (The comprehensive evaluation is typically the
    _initial_ new patient evaluation. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be ruling out other mental illnesses so often you will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for all illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)

    EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE

    **CC** (chief complaint): A
    brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.

    **HPI**: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:

    N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for psychiatric evaluation for anxiety. He is currently prescribed sertraline which he finds ineffective. His PCP referred him for evaluation and treatment.

    Or

    P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications. She is referred by her therapist for medication evaluation and treatment.

    Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

    Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your evaluation. Then, include a PSYCHIATRIC REVIEW OF SYMPTOMS. The symptoms onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5-TR diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.

    **Past Psychiatric History**: This section documents the patient’s past treatments. Use the mnemonic
    **G** o
    **Ch** a
    **MP.**

    **G** eneral Statement: Typically, this is a statement of the patients first treatment experience. For example: The patient entered treatment at the age of 10 with counseling for depression during her parents’ divorce. OR The patient entered treatment for detox at age 26 after abusing alcohol since age 13.

    **C** aregivers are listed if applicable.

    **H** ospitalizations: How many hospitalizations? When and where was last hospitalization? How many detox? How many residential treatments? When and where was last detox/residential treatment? Any history of suicidal or homicidal behaviors? Any history of self-harm behaviors?

    **M** edication trials: What are the previous psychotropic medications the patient has tried and what was their reaction? Effective, Not Effective, Adverse Reaction? Some examples: Haloperidol (dystonic reaction), risperidone (hyperprolactinemia), olanzapine (effective, insurance wouldn’t pay for it)

    **P** sychotherapy or
    **P** revious Psychiatric Diagnosis: This section can be completed one of two ways depending on what you want to capture to support the evaluation. First, does the patient know what type? Did they find psychotherapy helpful or not? Why? Second, what are the previous diagnosis for the client noted from previous treatments and other providers. Thirdly, you could document both.

    **Substance Use History:** This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.

    **Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History:** This section contains any family history of psychiatric illness, substance use illnesses, and family suicides. You may choose to use a genogram to depict this information. Be sure to include a reader’s key to your genogram or write up in narrative form.

    **Social History:** This section may be lengthy if completing an evaluation for psychotherapy or shorter if completing an evaluation for psychopharmacology. However, at a minimum, please include:

    Where patient was born, who raised the patient

    Number of brothers/sisters (what order is the patient within siblings)

    Who the patient currently lives with in a home? Are they single, married, divorced, widowed? How many children?

    Educational Level

    Hobbies:

    Work History: currently working/profession, disabled, unemployed, retired?

    Legal history: past hx, any current issues?

    Trauma history: Any childhood or adult history of trauma?

    Violence Hx:
    Concern or issues about safety (personal, home, community, sexual (current & historical)

    **Medical History:** This section contains any illnesses, surgeries, include any hx of seizures, head injuries.

    **Current Medications**: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.

    **Allergies**:
    Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.

    **Reproductive Hx**:
    Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse: oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns

    **ROS**: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis. Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!

    You should list each system as follows:
    General:Head:
    EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

    Example of Complete ROS:

    GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.

    HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.

    SKIN: No rash or itching.

    CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

    RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.

    GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

    GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color

    NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

    MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.

    HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.

    LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

    ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

    **Physical exam (If applicable and if you have opportunity to perform—document if exam is completed by PCP)**: From head to toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History.
    **Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see.** Always document in head-to-toe format i.e., General: Head: EENT: etc.

    **Diagnostic results**: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).

    **A** ssessment

    **Mental Status Examination:** For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.

    He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.   He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good.

    **Differential Diagnoses**:
    You must have at least three differentials with supporting evidence. Explain what rules each differential in or out and justify your primary diagnostic impression selection. You will use supporting evidence from the literature to support your rationale. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

    **Also included in this section is the reflection.** Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?

    Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (
    **demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!**), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    **References (move to begin on next page)**

    You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

    © 2021 Walden University Page 1 of 3

    **AssessingandDiagnosingPatientsWithMoodDisorders.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessinganddiagnosingpatientswithmooddisorders-docx-10214041)

    **AssessingandDiagnosingPatientsWithMoodDisorders.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessinganddiagnosingpatientswithmooddisorders-docx-10214041)

    **## NRNPPRAC6635ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationTemplate.docx**

    **NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template**

    **Week (enter week #): (Enter assignment title)**

    Student Name

    College of Nursing-PMHNP, Walden University

    NRNP 6635: Psychopathology and Diagnostic Reasoning

    Faculty Name

    Assignment Due Date

    **Subjective:**

    **CC** (chief complaint):

    **HPI**:

    **Past Psychiatric History**:

    ·
    **G** eneral Statement:

    ·
    **C** aregivers (if applicable):

    ·
    **H** ospitalizations:

    ·
    **M** edication trials:

    ·
    **P** sychotherapy or
    **P** revious Psychiatric Diagnosis:

    **Substance Current Use and History:**

    **Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History:**

    **Psychosocial History:**

    **Medical History:**

    ·
    **Current Medications**:

    ·
    **Allergies**:

    ·
    **Reproductive Hx**:

    **ROS**:

    · GENERAL:

    · HEENT:

    · SKIN:

    · CARDIOVASCULAR:

    · RESPIRATORY:

    · GASTROINTESTINAL:

    · GENITOURINARY:

    · NEUROLOGICAL:

    · MUSCULOSKELETAL:

    · HEMATOLOGIC:

    · LYMPHATICS:

    · ENDOCRINOLOGIC:

    **Objective:**

    **Physical exam:** if applicable

    **Diagnostic results**:

    **Assessment:**

    Mental Status Examination:

    Differential Diagnoses:

    Reflections:

    **References**

    © 2021 Walden University Page 1 of 3

    **## NRNP_PRAC_6635_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.docx**

    **NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar**

    INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY

    If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the
    Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template
    **_AND_** the Rubric
    as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. Below highlights by category are taken directly from the grading rubric for the assignment in Weeks 4–10. After reviewing the full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.

    In the
    Subjective section, provide:

    · Chief complaint

    · History of present illness (HPI)

    · Past psychiatric history

    · Medication trials and current medications

    · Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis

    · Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history

    · Allergies

    · ROS

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    In the
    Objective section, provide:

    · Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history

    · Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    In the
    Assessment section, provide:

    · Results of the mental status examination,
    _presented in paragraph form._

    · At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the
    _DSM-5-TR_ diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what
    _DSM-5-TR_ criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis.
    _Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case_.

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (
    **_demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment_**!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    (The comprehensive evaluation is typically the
    _initial_ new patient evaluation. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be ruling out other mental illnesses so often you will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for all illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)

    EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE

    **CC** (chief complaint): A
    brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.

    **HPI**: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:

    N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for psychiatric evaluation for anxiety. He is currently prescribed sertraline which he finds ineffective. His PCP referred him for evaluation and treatment.

    Or

    P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications. She is referred by her therapist for medication evaluation and treatment.

    Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

    Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your evaluation. Then, include a PSYCHIATRIC REVIEW OF SYMPTOMS. The symptoms onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5-TR diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.

    **Past Psychiatric History**: This section documents the patient’s past treatments. Use the mnemonic
    **G** o
    **Ch** a
    **MP.**

    **G** eneral Statement: Typically, this is a statement of the patients first treatment experience. For example: The patient entered treatment at the age of 10 with counseling for depression during her parents’ divorce. OR The patient entered treatment for detox at age 26 after abusing alcohol since age 13.

    **C** aregivers are listed if applicable.

    **H** ospitalizations: How many hospitalizations? When and where was last hospitalization? How many detox? How many residential treatments? When and where was last detox/residential treatment? Any history of suicidal or homicidal behaviors? Any history of self-harm behaviors?

    **M** edication trials: What are the previous psychotropic medications the patient has tried and what was their reaction? Effective, Not Effective, Adverse Reaction? Some examples: Haloperidol (dystonic reaction), risperidone (hyperprolactinemia), olanzapine (effective, insurance wouldn’t pay for it)

    **P** sychotherapy or
    **P** revious Psychiatric Diagnosis: This section can be completed one of two ways depending on what you want to capture to support the evaluation. First, does the patient know what type? Did they find psychotherapy helpful or not? Why? Second, what are the previous diagnosis for the client noted from previous treatments and other providers. Thirdly, you could document both.

    **Substance Use History:** This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.

    **Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History:** This section contains any family history of psychiatric illness, substance use illnesses, and family suicides. You may choose to use a genogram to depict this information. Be sure to include a reader’s key to your genogram or write up in narrative form.

    **Social History:** This section may be lengthy if completing an evaluation for psychotherapy or shorter if completing an evaluation for psychopharmacology. However, at a minimum, please include:

    Where patient was born, who raised the patient

    Number of brothers/sisters (what order is the patient within siblings)

    Who the patient currently lives with in a home? Are they single, married, divorced, widowed? How many children?

    Educational Level

    Hobbies:

    Work History: currently working/profession, disabled, unemployed, retired?

    Legal history: past hx, any current issues?

    Trauma history: Any childhood or adult history of trauma?

    Violence Hx:
    Concern or issues about safety (personal, home, community, sexual (current & historical)

    **Medical History:** This section contains any illnesses, surgeries, include any hx of seizures, head injuries.

    **Current Medications**: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.

    **Allergies**:
    Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.

    **Reproductive Hx**:
    Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse: oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns

    **ROS**: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis. Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!

    You should list each system as follows:
    General:Head:
    EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

    Example of Complete ROS:

    GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.

    HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.

    SKIN: No rash or itching.

    CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

    RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.

    GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

    GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color

    NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

    MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.

    HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.

    LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

    ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

    **Physical exam (If applicable and if you have opportunity to perform—document if exam is completed by PCP)**: From head to toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History.
    **Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see.** Always document in head-to-toe format i.e., General: Head: EENT: etc.

    **Diagnostic results**: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).

    **A** ssessment

    **Mental Status Examination:** For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.

    He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.   He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good.

    **Differential Diagnoses**:
    You must have at least three differentials with supporting evidence. Explain what rules each differential in or out and justify your primary diagnostic impression selection. You will use supporting evidence from the literature to support your rationale. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

    **Also included in this section is the reflection.** Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?

    Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (
    **demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!**), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    **References (move to begin on next page)**

    You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

    © 2021 Walden University Page 1 of 3

    **AssessingandDiagnosingPatientsWithMoodDisorders.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessinganddiagnosingpatientswithmooddisorders-docx-10214041)

    **## NRNPPRAC6635ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationTemplate.docx**

    **NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template**

    **Week (enter week #): (Enter assignment title)**

    Student Name

    College of Nursing-PMHNP, Walden University

    NRNP 6635: Psychopathology and Diagnostic Reasoning

    Faculty Name

    Assignment Due Date

    **Subjective:**

    **CC** (chief complaint):

    **HPI**:

    **Past Psychiatric History**:

    ·
    **G** eneral Statement:

    ·
    **C** aregivers (if applicable):

    ·
    **H** ospitalizations:

    ·
    **M** edication trials:

    ·
    **P** sychotherapy or
    **P** revious Psychiatric Diagnosis:

    **Substance Current Use and History:**

    **Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History:**

    **Psychosocial History:**

    **Medical History:**

    ·
    **Current Medications**:

    ·
    **Allergies**:

    ·
    **Reproductive Hx**:

    **ROS**:

    · GENERAL:

    · HEENT:

    · SKIN:

    · CARDIOVASCULAR:

    · RESPIRATORY:

    · GASTROINTESTINAL:

    · GENITOURINARY:

    · NEUROLOGICAL:

    · MUSCULOSKELETAL:

    · HEMATOLOGIC:

    · LYMPHATICS:

    · ENDOCRINOLOGIC:

    **Objective:**

    **Physical exam:** if applicable

    **Diagnostic results**:

    **Assessment:**

    Mental Status Examination:

    Differential Diagnoses:

    Reflections:

    **References**

    © 2021 Walden University Page 1 of 3

    **## NRNP_PRAC_6635_ComprehensivePsychiatricEvaluationExemplar_rev.4.2022.docx**

    **NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar**

    INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY

    If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the
    Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template
    **_AND_** the Rubric
    as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. Below highlights by category are taken directly from the grading rubric for the assignment in Weeks 4–10. After reviewing the full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.

    In the
    Subjective section, provide:

    · Chief complaint

    · History of present illness (HPI)

    · Past psychiatric history

    · Medication trials and current medications

    · Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis

    · Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history

    · Allergies

    · ROS

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    In the
    Objective section, provide:

    · Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history

    · Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    In the
    Assessment section, provide:

    · Results of the mental status examination,
    _presented in paragraph form._

    · At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the
    _DSM-5-TR_ diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what
    _DSM-5-TR_ criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis.
    _Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case_.

    ·
    Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

    Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (
    **_demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment_**!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    (The comprehensive evaluation is typically the
    _initial_ new patient evaluation. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be ruling out other mental illnesses so often you will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for all illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)

    EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE

    **CC** (chief complaint): A
    brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.

    **HPI**: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:

    N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for psychiatric evaluation for anxiety. He is currently prescribed sertraline which he finds ineffective. His PCP referred him for evaluation and treatment.

    Or

    P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications. She is referred by her therapist for medication evaluation and treatment.

    Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

    Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your evaluation. Then, include a PSYCHIATRIC REVIEW OF SYMPTOMS. The symptoms onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5-TR diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.

    **Past Psychiatric History**: This section documents the patient’s past treatments. Use the mnemonic
    **G** o
    **Ch** a
    **MP.**

    **G** eneral Statement: Typically, this is a statement of the patients first treatment experience. For example: The patient entered treatment at the age of 10 with counseling for depression during her parents’ divorce. OR The patient entered treatment for detox at age 26 after abusing alcohol since age 13.

    **C** aregivers are listed if applicable.

    **H** ospitalizations: How many hospitalizations? When and where was last hospitalization? How many detox? How many residential treatments? When and where was last detox/residential treatment? Any history of suicidal or homicidal behaviors? Any history of self-harm behaviors?

    **M** edication trials: What are the previous psychotropic medications the patient has tried and what was their reaction? Effective, Not Effective, Adverse Reaction? Some examples: Haloperidol (dystonic reaction), risperidone (hyperprolactinemia), olanzapine (effective, insurance wouldn’t pay for it)

    **P** sychotherapy or
    **P** revious Psychiatric Diagnosis: This section can be completed one of two ways depending on what you want to capture to support the evaluation. First, does the patient know what type? Did they find psychotherapy helpful or not? Why? Second, what are the previous diagnosis for the client noted from previous treatments and other providers. Thirdly, you could document both.

    **Substance Use History:** This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.

    **Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History:** This section contains any family history of psychiatric illness, substance use illnesses, and family suicides. You may choose to use a genogram to depict this information. Be sure to include a reader’s key to your genogram or write up in narrative form.

    **Social History:** This section may be lengthy if completing an evaluation for psychotherapy or shorter if completing an evaluation for psychopharmacology. However, at a minimum, please include:

    Where patient was born, who raised the patient

    Number of brothers/sisters (what order is the patient within siblings)

    Who the patient currently lives with in a home? Are they single, married, divorced, widowed? How many children?

    Educational Level

    Hobbies:

    Work History: currently working/profession, disabled, unemployed, retired?

    Legal history: past hx, any current issues?

    Trauma history: Any childhood or adult history of trauma?

    Violence Hx:
    Concern or issues about safety (personal, home, community, sexual (current & historical)

    **Medical History:** This section contains any illnesses, surgeries, include any hx of seizures, head injuries.

    **Current Medications**: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.

    **Allergies**:
    Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.

    **Reproductive Hx**:
    Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse: oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns

    **ROS**: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis. Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!

    You should list each system as follows:
    General:Head:
    EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

    Example of Complete ROS:

    GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.

    HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.

    SKIN: No rash or itching.

    CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

    RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.

    GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

    GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color

    NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

    MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.

    HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.

    LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

    ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

    **Physical exam (If applicable and if you have opportunity to perform—document if exam is completed by PCP)**: From head to toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History.
    **Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see.** Always document in head-to-toe format i.e., General: Head: EENT: etc.

    **Diagnostic results**: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).

    **A** ssessment

    **Mental Status Examination:** For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.

    He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.   He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good.

    **Differential Diagnoses**:
    You must have at least three differentials with supporting evidence. Explain what rules each differential in or out and justify your primary diagnostic impression selection. You will use supporting evidence from the literature to support your rationale. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

    **Also included in this section is the reflection.** Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?

    Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (
    **demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!**), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

    **References (move to begin on next page)**

    You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

    © 2021 Walden University Page 1 of 3

    **AssessingandDiagnosingPatientsWithMoodDisorders.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessinganddiagnosingpatientswithmooddisorders-docx-10214041)

  • [Solved] week 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – For your introductory post, imagine you are on an interview. Please provide a response to the following questions via a video response: 1. Tell us your name and, if you have a nickname, let us know what you like to go by. 2. If you feel comfortable, tell us a little about where you are from and an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – For your introductory post, imagine you are on an interview. Please provide a response to the following questions via a video response:
    1. Tell us your name and, if you have a nickname, let us know what you like to go by.
    2. If you feel comfortable, tell us a little about where you are from and any hobbies that you enjoy.
    3. Tell us what your current nursing role is and what your future goals are for your nursing career.
    4. Tell us what you hope you gain from class and how you hope it will help you in your role as a nurse.

    Let’s dive into stakeholder perceptions of the U.S. healthcare system as this will be a great foundation for the rest of the course.

    As a consumer of healthcare services and insurance, consider your own perspectives of the U.S. healthcare system. Please address each of the following aspects in your discussion response and support your answer with evidence from the literature.

    – As a nurse, you wear at least two or more stakeholder hats; how does being a nurse influence your role as a consumer of healthcare?
    – How does your knowledge of the U.S. health care system impact how you can help other stakeholders?
    – Explain the various sphere(s) of influence (consumer, provider, etc.) that would be the most impactful in advancing healthcare policy initiatives and explain wh

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] English Outline

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ OutlineInstructions.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outlineinstructions-png "OutlineInstructions.png") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    OutlineInstructions.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outlineinstructions-png "OutlineInstructions.png")

    – 2 years ago