Tag: Care Plans, Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

  • [Solved] certified registered nurse anesthetist

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – write about certified registered nurse anesthetist. – Include the following: – expectations and responsibilities of the role itself – education requirements for the chosen career path, – salary ranges and demand for the role – pros/cons of the role – impact of the role on nursing or healthcare tre…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – write about certified registered nurse anesthetist.
    – Include the following:
    – expectations and responsibilities of the role itself
    – education requirements for the chosen career path,
    – salary ranges and demand for the role
    – pros/cons of the role
    – impact of the role on nursing or healthcare trends/issues

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (1)** – ## WritingAssignmentWeek4.docx **## WritingAssignmentWeek4.docx** Writing Assignment Week 4: Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community **Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community** _(Examine how healthcare services in_ _**your specific ZI…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WritingAssignmentWeek4.docx

    **## WritingAssignmentWeek4.docx**

    Writing Assignment Week 4: Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community

    **Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community** _(Examine how healthcare services in_
    _**your specific ZIP code** are providing telehealth and remote monitoring options and whether these services benefit the patient population.) my zip is 33325 Plantation_

    **Assignment Overview**

    **In this essay, you will evaluate the extent to which healthcare services in your specific geographic area (use your ZIP code for specificity- NAME YOUR actual CITY where you live) are offering telehealth and remote monitoring options. You will analyze the impact of these services on patient care and outcomes. Your submission must include at least three examples that you uncovered through research in your neighborhood.**

    **Requirements**

    **Essay Format and Length:**

    · The assignment must be written as a formal essay.

    · It must include an introduction, graduate-level discussion questions and responses, and a conclusion that synthesizes your key points.

    ·
    **The paper should be a minimum of 3 pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference list.**

    **Content Specifics:**

    ·
    **Introduction:**

    · Introduce the topic with background information on telehealth and remote monitoring.

    · Clearly state the purpose of your essay.

    · Provide your ZIP code to contextualize the geographic focus of your study.

    ·
    **Graduate-Level Questions & Analysis:**

    · Develop and answer at least two or three in-depth, graduate-level questions related to:

    · How telehealth and remote monitoring options are integrated into local healthcare services.

    · The benefits (or perceived benefits) these options offer to the patient population.

    · Potential challenges or limitations associated with these technological advances.

    · Make sure to substantiate your analysis with evidence-based practice (EBP). This should include referencing scholarly articles, government or institutional reports, and credible online sources.

    · Include at least three concrete examples from your research in your local neighborhood that illustrate how these services are implemented. Explain how each example supports your discussion.

    ·
    **Conclusion:**

    · Summarize your findings.

    · Synthesize the key points discussed in your paper.

    · Reflect on the overall impact of telehealth and remote monitoring services on patient care in your area.

    **APA Format:**

    · Your essay must strictly adhere to APA 7th Edition guidelines.

    · Ensure correct use of APA formatting for the title page, headings/levels, in-text citations, and the reference list.

    · Double-check that all references are accurately cited within your text and that your reference list is complete.

    **Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):**

    · Develop your answers and support your analysis with evidence-based research.

    · Incorporate data, statistics, and findings from peer-reviewed literature and reputable sources to lend credibility to your discussion.

    · 4 current sources must be used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources.  All REFERENCES must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up

    **Rubric Review:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric provided by your instructor. Make sure your essay addresses all the required components and meets the expected quality criteria.

    **Submission Guidelines**

    ·
    **File Format:** Submit your assignment as a Word document or PDF via the designated course submission portal.

    ·
    **Cover Page and References:** A cover page and a separate references page are required. These pages are not included in the minimum page count.

    ·
    **Deadline:** Submit the final version of your essay by the due date specified in your course calendar.

    ·
    **Proofreading:** Check for clarity, coherence, grammar, and APA formatting before submission. A well-organized and carefully proofread paper will reflect your understanding and attention to detail.

    By following these instructions, you will create a comprehensive, well-structured, and evidence-based analysis of how telehealth and remote monitoring options are utilized within your local healthcare services. This assignment not only highlights your ability to connect academic research with real-world healthcare practices but also demonstrates your capacity for critical thinking and graduate-level writing.

    Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further clarification. Good luck with your research and writing!

    Remember, your analysis should be both reflective and analytical, providing a robust discussion on how telehealth solutions are impacting patient care in your own neighborhood. Use your findings to contribute meaningful insights into the ongoing evolution of healthcare services.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    Writing Assignment Week 4: Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community

    Rubric Details

    **Maximum Score**

    100 points

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Clearly introduces telehealth and remote monitoring, identifies the actual city and ZIP code, establishes strong local relevance, and presents a focused purpose statement.

    **14**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Introduces the topic, identifies city and ZIP code, and states the essay purpose.

    **10.5**

    **Developing**

    Includes limited background, unclear purpose, or incomplete local context.

    **7**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Missing or substantially incomplete introduction, city, ZIP code, or purpose.

    **3.5**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Develops and thoroughly answers 2–3 meaningful graduate-level questions. Analysis is reflective, evidence based, and demonstrates critical thinking about integration, benefits, and limitations.

    **14**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Develops and answers 2–3 relevant questions with adequate analysis and evidence.

    **10.5**

    **Developing**

    Questions or responses are underdeveloped, primarily descriptive, or inconsistently supported.

    **7**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Required questions are missing, unclear, or not adequately answered.

    **3.5**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Provides at least three distinct, specific, well-researched examples of local services or programs. Clearly explains how each operates and supports the analysis.

    **14**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Provides three local examples with adequate explanation and connection to the paper’s discussion.

    **10.5**

    **Developing**

    Provides fewer than three examples, examples lack specificity, or local relevance is unclear.

    **7**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Local examples are absent, inaccurate, or not connected to the stated community.

    **3.5**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Critically analyzes benefits for the local population, including access, convenience, chronic-disease management, patient outcomes, equity, and patient satisfaction. Uses evidence and local context effectively.

    **13**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Explains relevant patient benefits and supports most claims with evidence.

    **9.75**

    **Developing**

    Benefits are identified but lack depth, local application, or sufficient evidence.

    **6.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Benefits are missing, inaccurate, or unsupported.

    **3.25**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Thoroughly evaluates limitations such as digital literacy, broadband access, affordability, privacy, confidentiality, clinical appropriateness, and health inequities. Offers feasible considerations for improvement.

    **13**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Identifies relevant challenges and limitations with appropriate discussion.

    **9.75**

    **Developing**

    Addresses challenges superficially or omits important concerns.

    **6.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Challenges and limitations are absent or inaccurate.

    **3.25**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Clearly synthesizes findings, reflects on the overall local impact of telehealth and remote monitoring, and does not introduce new information.

    **13**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Summarizes key findings and addresses the local impact.

    **9.75**

    **Developing**

    Conclusion is brief, repetitive, or only partially synthesizes the discussion.

    **6.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Missing or does not summarize the paper’s key points

    **3.25**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Uses at least four current scholarly sources, all with DOI numbers. Evidence is integrated effectively, supports claims, includes relevant data or statistics, and all local service claims are supported by credible sources.

    **11**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Uses at least four current scholarly sources with DOI numbers and generally integrates evidence appropriately.

    **8.25**

    **Developing**

    Does not fully meet the source, currency, DOI, citation, or evidence-integration requirements. Less than 4 references used.

    **5.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Uses insufficient (2 or less current reference) , outdated, non-scholarly, uncited, or incomplete sources.

    **2.75**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Fully follows APA 7, including title page, headings, citations, reference list, DOI formatting, and citation-reference matching. Writing is organized, coherent, professional, and free of significant grammar errors. Meets minimum three-page body requirement. Similarity index and AI index 20% or lower.

    **8**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Minor APA, grammar, or organization errors that do not interfere with clarity. Meets page-length requirement. Similarity index and AI index 25% or lower.

    **6**

    **Developing**

    Multiple APA, grammar, citation, or organization errors. May be under the required length. Similarity index and AI index 30% or lower..

    **4**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Major APA nonadherence, unclear writing, missing references, or does not meet length or submission requirements. Similarity index and AI index above 30%.

    **## WritingAssignmentWeek4.docx**

    Writing Assignment Week 4: Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community

    **Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community** _(Examine how healthcare services in_
    _**your specific ZIP code** are providing telehealth and remote monitoring options and whether these services benefit the patient population.) my zip is 33325 Plantation_

    **Assignment Overview**

    **In this essay, you will evaluate the extent to which healthcare services in your specific geographic area (use your ZIP code for specificity- NAME YOUR actual CITY where you live) are offering telehealth and remote monitoring options. You will analyze the impact of these services on patient care and outcomes. Your submission must include at least three examples that you uncovered through research in your neighborhood.**

    **Requirements**

    **Essay Format and Length:**

    · The assignment must be written as a formal essay.

    · It must include an introduction, graduate-level discussion questions and responses, and a conclusion that synthesizes your key points.

    ·
    **The paper should be a minimum of 3 pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference list.**

    **Content Specifics:**

    ·
    **Introduction:**

    · Introduce the topic with background information on telehealth and remote monitoring.

    · Clearly state the purpose of your essay.

    · Provide your ZIP code to contextualize the geographic focus of your study.

    ·
    **Graduate-Level Questions & Analysis:**

    · Develop and answer at least two or three in-depth, graduate-level questions related to:

    · How telehealth and remote monitoring options are integrated into local healthcare services.

    · The benefits (or perceived benefits) these options offer to the patient population.

    · Potential challenges or limitations associated with these technological advances.

    · Make sure to substantiate your analysis with evidence-based practice (EBP). This should include referencing scholarly articles, government or institutional reports, and credible online sources.

    · Include at least three concrete examples from your research in your local neighborhood that illustrate how these services are implemented. Explain how each example supports your discussion.

    ·
    **Conclusion:**

    · Summarize your findings.

    · Synthesize the key points discussed in your paper.

    · Reflect on the overall impact of telehealth and remote monitoring services on patient care in your area.

    **APA Format:**

    · Your essay must strictly adhere to APA 7th Edition guidelines.

    · Ensure correct use of APA formatting for the title page, headings/levels, in-text citations, and the reference list.

    · Double-check that all references are accurately cited within your text and that your reference list is complete.

    **Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):**

    · Develop your answers and support your analysis with evidence-based research.

    · Incorporate data, statistics, and findings from peer-reviewed literature and reputable sources to lend credibility to your discussion.

    · 4 current sources must be used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources.  All REFERENCES must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up

    **Rubric Review:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric provided by your instructor. Make sure your essay addresses all the required components and meets the expected quality criteria.

    **Submission Guidelines**

    ·
    **File Format:** Submit your assignment as a Word document or PDF via the designated course submission portal.

    ·
    **Cover Page and References:** A cover page and a separate references page are required. These pages are not included in the minimum page count.

    ·
    **Deadline:** Submit the final version of your essay by the due date specified in your course calendar.

    ·
    **Proofreading:** Check for clarity, coherence, grammar, and APA formatting before submission. A well-organized and carefully proofread paper will reflect your understanding and attention to detail.

    By following these instructions, you will create a comprehensive, well-structured, and evidence-based analysis of how telehealth and remote monitoring options are utilized within your local healthcare services. This assignment not only highlights your ability to connect academic research with real-world healthcare practices but also demonstrates your capacity for critical thinking and graduate-level writing.

    Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further clarification. Good luck with your research and writing!

    Remember, your analysis should be both reflective and analytical, providing a robust discussion on how telehealth solutions are impacting patient care in your own neighborhood. Use your findings to contribute meaningful insights into the ongoing evolution of healthcare services.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    Writing Assignment Week 4: Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community

    Rubric Details

    **Maximum Score**

    100 points

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Clearly introduces telehealth and remote monitoring, identifies the actual city and ZIP code, establishes strong local relevance, and presents a focused purpose statement.

    **14**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Introduces the topic, identifies city and ZIP code, and states the essay purpose.

    **10.5**

    **Developing**

    Includes limited background, unclear purpose, or incomplete local context.

    **7**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Missing or substantially incomplete introduction, city, ZIP code, or purpose.

    **3.5**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Develops and thoroughly answers 2–3 meaningful graduate-level questions. Analysis is reflective, evidence based, and demonstrates critical thinking about integration, benefits, and limitations.

    **14**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Develops and answers 2–3 relevant questions with adequate analysis and evidence.

    **10.5**

    **Developing**

    Questions or responses are underdeveloped, primarily descriptive, or inconsistently supported.

    **7**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Required questions are missing, unclear, or not adequately answered.

    **3.5**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Provides at least three distinct, specific, well-researched examples of local services or programs. Clearly explains how each operates and supports the analysis.

    **14**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Provides three local examples with adequate explanation and connection to the paper’s discussion.

    **10.5**

    **Developing**

    Provides fewer than three examples, examples lack specificity, or local relevance is unclear.

    **7**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Local examples are absent, inaccurate, or not connected to the stated community.

    **3.5**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Critically analyzes benefits for the local population, including access, convenience, chronic-disease management, patient outcomes, equity, and patient satisfaction. Uses evidence and local context effectively.

    **13**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Explains relevant patient benefits and supports most claims with evidence.

    **9.75**

    **Developing**

    Benefits are identified but lack depth, local application, or sufficient evidence.

    **6.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Benefits are missing, inaccurate, or unsupported.

    **3.25**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Thoroughly evaluates limitations such as digital literacy, broadband access, affordability, privacy, confidentiality, clinical appropriateness, and health inequities. Offers feasible considerations for improvement.

    **13**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Identifies relevant challenges and limitations with appropriate discussion.

    **9.75**

    **Developing**

    Addresses challenges superficially or omits important concerns.

    **6.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Challenges and limitations are absent or inaccurate.

    **3.25**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Clearly synthesizes findings, reflects on the overall local impact of telehealth and remote monitoring, and does not introduce new information.

    **13**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Summarizes key findings and addresses the local impact.

    **9.75**

    **Developing**

    Conclusion is brief, repetitive, or only partially synthesizes the discussion.

    **6.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Missing or does not summarize the paper’s key points

    **3.25**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Uses at least four current scholarly sources, all with DOI numbers. Evidence is integrated effectively, supports claims, includes relevant data or statistics, and all local service claims are supported by credible sources.

    **11**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Uses at least four current scholarly sources with DOI numbers and generally integrates evidence appropriately.

    **8.25**

    **Developing**

    Does not fully meet the source, currency, DOI, citation, or evidence-integration requirements. Less than 4 references used.

    **5.5**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Uses insufficient (2 or less current reference) , outdated, non-scholarly, uncited, or incomplete sources.

    **2.75**

    **Exceeds Expectations**

    Fully follows APA 7, including title page, headings, citations, reference list, DOI formatting, and citation-reference matching. Writing is organized, coherent, professional, and free of significant grammar errors. Meets minimum three-page body requirement. Similarity index and AI index 20% or lower.

    **8**

    **Meets Expectations**

    Minor APA, grammar, or organization errors that do not interfere with clarity. Meets page-length requirement. Similarity index and AI index 25% or lower.

    **6**

    **Developing**

    Multiple APA, grammar, citation, or organization errors. May be under the required length. Similarity index and AI index 30% or lower..

    **4**

    **Does Not Meet**

    Major APA nonadherence, unclear writing, missing references, or does not meet length or submission requirements. Similarity index and AI index above 30%.

  • [Solved] Nursing Nursing homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help with homework – a month ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help with homework

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] Nursing Nursing Assignment Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Nursing Assignment Help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (1)** – ## DLV-2.docx **## DLV-2.docx** 9 Differentiate types of conflict in the workplace. **Student Success Criteria** View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the "This item is graded with a rubric" link, which is located in the Details & Information pane. *…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## DLV-2.docx

    **## DLV-2.docx**

    9

    Differentiate types of conflict in the workplace.

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the "This item is graded with a rubric" link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

    **Scenario**

    Your team consists of individuals with diverse backgrounds, skills, and perspectives. Because of that, your team encounters various types of conflict. The team is working on a high-stakes project with tight deadlines and high expectations. As the project progresses, you observe various conflicts emerging among team members. Explore the underlying factors contributing to the conflicts.

    **Instructions**

    Choose one of the listed Conflict Scenarios below to assess and resolve. Your task is to explore the underlying factors contributing to the conflict and categorize them while defining the type of conflict demonstrated. You must also analyze and address these conflicts to ensure a harmonious and productive work environment.

    Develop a detailed 5-7-step conflict resolution strategy for one of the conflict scenarios below. This should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document. It should be formatted as a bulleted or numbered list or table and include the following:

    1.
    **Introduction paragraph**:

    2. Summarize the scenario.

    3. Define the type of conflict.

    4. Explanation of your conflict categorization choice. (Remember: Definitions, external content use, or paraphrasing learned information requires citation)

    5. A
    **5-7-step plan** with a detailed explanation of each step for conflict resolution.

    6.
    **Conclusion paragraph** detailing 2-3 reasons the resolution plan will work in this scenario.

    **Conflict Scenarios**

    **Scenario 1:** Imagine a team working on a software development project. Two team members, Bill and Mike, have differing opinions on the best programming language to use for a critical module. Bill argues for Python, emphasizing its readability and extensive libraries, while Mike advocates for Java, citing its robustness and widespread use in similar projects.

    **Scenario 2:** Consider a marketing team tasked with promoting a new product. Two team members, James and Jordan, have conflicting views on the marketing approach. James emphasizes the product's affordability to make it accessible to a broader audience. At the same time, Jordan is passionate about highlighting the product's premium features to position it as a high-end luxury item.

    **Scenario 3:** Imagine a project team where two team members, Wylie and Cristobal, have been experiencing incompatibility in their friendship. Their disagreements have escalated, leading to a lack of collaboration and communication. The conflict seems rooted in personal differences, making it challenging for them to work together effectively.

    **Scenario 4:** Consider a scenario where two team members, Elliot and Kipton, have conflicting personalities. Elliot is extroverted, assertive, and prefers quick decision-making, while Kipton is introverted, reflective, and values thorough analysis. Their differing personality styles have led to misunderstandings and communication challenges.

    **Scenario 5:** Imagine a project team where members are working on a complex deliverable that requires significant collaboration. Two team members, Jamie and Riley, have conflicting schedules and dependencies on each other's work. Jamie prefers working late hours, while Riley values an early start. This difference in work schedules is impacting their ability to meet project deadlines
    **.**

    **Requirements/Submission Requirement:**

    · Microsoft Word document formatted as a bulleted or numbered list or table.

    **NOTE** – Be sure the document displays proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure

    **## DLV-2.docx**

    9

    Differentiate types of conflict in the workplace.

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the "This item is graded with a rubric" link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

    **Scenario**

    Your team consists of individuals with diverse backgrounds, skills, and perspectives. Because of that, your team encounters various types of conflict. The team is working on a high-stakes project with tight deadlines and high expectations. As the project progresses, you observe various conflicts emerging among team members. Explore the underlying factors contributing to the conflicts.

    **Instructions**

    Choose one of the listed Conflict Scenarios below to assess and resolve. Your task is to explore the underlying factors contributing to the conflict and categorize them while defining the type of conflict demonstrated. You must also analyze and address these conflicts to ensure a harmonious and productive work environment.

    Develop a detailed 5-7-step conflict resolution strategy for one of the conflict scenarios below. This should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document. It should be formatted as a bulleted or numbered list or table and include the following:

    1.
    **Introduction paragraph**:

    2. Summarize the scenario.

    3. Define the type of conflict.

    4. Explanation of your conflict categorization choice. (Remember: Definitions, external content use, or paraphrasing learned information requires citation)

    5. A
    **5-7-step plan** with a detailed explanation of each step for conflict resolution.

    6.
    **Conclusion paragraph** detailing 2-3 reasons the resolution plan will work in this scenario.

    **Conflict Scenarios**

    **Scenario 1:** Imagine a team working on a software development project. Two team members, Bill and Mike, have differing opinions on the best programming language to use for a critical module. Bill argues for Python, emphasizing its readability and extensive libraries, while Mike advocates for Java, citing its robustness and widespread use in similar projects.

    **Scenario 2:** Consider a marketing team tasked with promoting a new product. Two team members, James and Jordan, have conflicting views on the marketing approach. James emphasizes the product's affordability to make it accessible to a broader audience. At the same time, Jordan is passionate about highlighting the product's premium features to position it as a high-end luxury item.

    **Scenario 3:** Imagine a project team where two team members, Wylie and Cristobal, have been experiencing incompatibility in their friendship. Their disagreements have escalated, leading to a lack of collaboration and communication. The conflict seems rooted in personal differences, making it challenging for them to work together effectively.

    **Scenario 4:** Consider a scenario where two team members, Elliot and Kipton, have conflicting personalities. Elliot is extroverted, assertive, and prefers quick decision-making, while Kipton is introverted, reflective, and values thorough analysis. Their differing personality styles have led to misunderstandings and communication challenges.

    **Scenario 5:** Imagine a project team where members are working on a complex deliverable that requires significant collaboration. Two team members, Jamie and Riley, have conflicting schedules and dependencies on each other's work. Jamie prefers working late hours, while Riley values an early start. This difference in work schedules is impacting their ability to meet project deadlines
    **.**

    **Requirements/Submission Requirement:**

    · Microsoft Word document formatted as a bulleted or numbered list or table.

    **NOTE** – Be sure the document displays proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure

  • [Solved] help me

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering help me.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] concept map

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering concept map.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assessment 40604

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached **files (2)** – ## Assessment40604.docx – ## Assessment1-1.Attempt1.docx.pdf **## Assessment40604.docx** For this assessment, you will conclude the clinical learning activity you began in Assessment 1. **Please see attached** You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## Assessment40604.docx

    – ## Assessment1-1.Attempt1.docx.pdf

    **## Assessment40604.docx**

    For this assessment, you will conclude the clinical learning activity you began in Assessment 1.
    **Please see attached**

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, the hypothetical health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1 to your fictitious audience. In this hypothetical scenario, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, evaluate the objectives of the plan, revise the plan as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you decide to

    **Develop a PowerPoint presentation with voice-over and speaker notes with script to communicate your plan.**

    Complete the following:

    ·
    **Prepare a 10–12 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes and script** that reflects your hypothetical presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well organized. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint tutorial). The transcript can be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the hypothetical face-to-face educational session addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the hypothetical participant(s) in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    Supporting Evidence

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references, published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    **## Assessment1-1.Attempt1.docx.pdf**

    1

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    September ,2026

    2

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    Adult obesity remains a leading community health concern because it increases chronic

    disease risk and reduces quality of life (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

    [ODPHP], n.d.-a). This hypothetical plan describes a 60-minute face-to-face session for

    community-dwelling working-age adults in Columbus, Ohio. The plan examines the issue, finds

    a vulnerable population, maps social factors, and establishes collaborative SMART objectives to

    be achieved in the subsequent educational session.

    Analysis of the Health Concern

    Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher are classified as having

    obesity (Emmerich et al., 2024). Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular

    disease, stroke, some types of cancer, and decreased quality of life (ODPHP, n.d.-a). Healthy

    People 2030 goal NWS-03 targets to decrease adult obesity to 36.0% (ODPHP, n.d.-b). The most

    recent age-adjusted estimate is 40.2% in 2021-2023, and the change is not significant (ODPHP,

    n.d.-b). August 2021 to August 2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data

    show 40.3% of adults with obesity, 46.4% of adults ages 40–59, and 9.4% with severe obesity

    (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    The maps of the 2024 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that all

    reporting states are at 25% or more (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025).

    The Midwest leads at 35.9%, and Ohio remains at or above 35% (CDC, 2025). In most states,

    Black and Hispanic adults have a higher rate of obesity compared to White and Asian adults and

    decreases with education (CDC, 2025). Clinicians are supposed to provide or make referrals to

    3

    adults with a BMI of 30 and above to intensive, multicomponent behavioral interventions (U.S.

    Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF], 2018). These programs result in an average weight

    loss of 1.56 kg among lower-income adults, with the greatest weight loss due to incentives and

    feedback (Li et al., 2024).

    This plan assumes attendees are contemplating change, will report usual intake and

    activity honestly, and will accept four-week follow-up. It assumes beverages, walking, and

    home-food changes can start without medication. Uncertainty remains: BMI imperfectly marks

    risk across groups, stigma can reduce attendance, and shift work plus food cost limit what one

    hour can change. Expected outcomes are skills and a first supported attempt, not a large

    immediate BMI drop.

    Target Population, Scenario, and Predisposing Factors

    The session is a 60-minute evening class at the Linden Community Recreation Center in

    Columbus, Ohio. After recruiting them by use of flyers, church bulletins, and two local work

    sites, eight community-dwelling adults will be invited. None of them reside in a hospital, assisted

    living, nursing home, or other institution.

    The sample consists of five females and three males aged 36-56 years. There are four

    non-Hispanic Black, two non-Hispanic White, and two Hispanic. Six evening or rotating shifts in

    warehousing, food service, or retail. Education ranges from a high school diploma to some

    college, and income is about $32,000–$54,000. Five have school-going children. It covers both

    Medicaid and high-deductible plans. BMI values range from 31 to 39. Daily sodas, late takeout,

    and fewer than 60 minutes of planned activity per week are common.

    4

    Tanya R. is a 47-year-old married non-Hispanic Black warehouse associate and mother

    of two who earns about $41,000. Her last BMI was 34.8 kg/m². Fasting glucose last year was in

    the prediabetes range, and her mother has type 2 diabetes. She does not eat breakfast, consumes a

    few sodas during working days, orders carryout most evenings, and has never maintained a food

    diary.

    This group is predisposed to obesity because rates peak in midlife and among adults

    without a bachelor’s degree (Emmerich et al., 2024). In most states that report, obesity is at 35%

    or more prevalent in Black adults (CDC, 2025). The adult rate is higher than the NWS-03 target

    in Ohio (CDC, 2025). Healthy habits and intensive treatment are limited by shift work, low

    access to evening groceries, the density of carryout, caregiving, and high deductibles (USPSTF,

    2018). A recreation center class can access those workers who do not visit a primary-care weight

    visit frequently.

    Sociogram Considerations and Learning Needs

    A sociogram will map ties that sustain energy-dense eating and inactivity and ties that

    could support change. Respondents will identify who they will eat with, who would not welcome

    change, and who would assist them in walking, cooking, or avoiding sugary beverages. Arrows

    will indicate influence to enable the nurse to recognize stars, isolates, and the work-versus-home

    split.

    Some of the risk ties are overtime to dinner, colleagues who share carryout, children who

    like packaged foods, local soda stores, and family members who consider second helpings as a

    sign of hospitality. Family history includes Tanya’s mother with diabetes. Protective

    5

    relationships consist of a walking spouse, a teen who is ready to pack lunches, the center

    coordinator, and a primary-care nurse.

    Participants know excess weight raises diabetes risk but cannot explain BMI categories or

    the 5%–7% prevention threshold (ODPHP, n.d.-a). They have not been practicing label reading

    and step goals and are unaware that there are local track hours and Diabetes Prevention Program

    cohorts. The session will educate on energy balance, compare carryout with packed lunch,

    practice a brief walk, finish the sociogram, and establish a single collaborative goal.

    Current Behaviors, Session Expectations, and Collaborative SMART Goals

    The current behaviors are daily sodas, frequent carryout, missed breakfast, minimal

    planned activity, and no log. The expectations include full attendance, truthful reporting,

    sociogram work, one teach-back, and at least one personal goal. Supports include plain-language

    visuals, a lunch comparison, a short track walk, printed logs, and a two-minute private goal talk.

    Agreed-upon goals matter because change lasts longer when participants help define

    success (MacLeod, 2012). MacLeod suggests specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and

    time-bound objectives, which are also engaging and rewarding. The cooperation between the

    desire to cook at home and the fear of rejected food or lost time of walking appears. Shared goals

    are the evaluation criteria for Assessment 4. Working with Tanya and the group produced the

    following SMART goals. By the end of the 60-minute session, each participant will state their

    current BMI category and list three personal triggers with one realistic substitute for each, shown

    on a worksheet and confirmed by teach-back.

    6

    1. Within seven days, at least six of eight participants will complete a three-day food-and-

    step log and identify one 30-minute walking block on four workdays, confirmed by

    follow-up contact.

    2. Within four weeks, each participant will replace sugar-sweetened beverages on at least

    five days each week and accumulate at least 150 minutes of moderate activity or 8,000

    steps on at least four days each week or will record a barrier and a revised plan.

    These goals follow assessment, counseling, skill practice, and self-monitoring (USPSTF,

    2018). They remain realistic because similar behavioral programs produce modest, measurable

    change (Li et al., 2024). The same goals will be used to evaluate the later educational session.

    7

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Adult obesity prevalence maps. U.S.

    Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-

    statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity

    prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023 (NCHS Data Brief No.

    508). National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281

    Li, P., Huang, Y., & Wong, A. (2024). Behavioural strategies to reduce obesity among lower

    socio-economic adults living in high-income countries: A Grades of Recommendation,

    Assessment, Development and Evaluation-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

    of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition, 131(3), 544–552.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940

    MacLeod, L. (2012). Making SMART goals smarter. Physician Executive, 38(2), 68–72.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-a). Overweight and obesity. Healthy

    People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-b). Reduce the proportion of adults

    with obesity (NWS-03). Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human

    Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). Behavioral weight loss interventions to prevent

    obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281](https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281)

    [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    8

    recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(11), 1163–1171.

    https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022

    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022)

    **## Assessment1-1.Attempt1.docx.pdf**

    1

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    September ,2026

    2

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    Adult obesity remains a leading community health concern because it increases chronic

    disease risk and reduces quality of life (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

    [ODPHP], n.d.-a). This hypothetical plan describes a 60-minute face-to-face session for

    community-dwelling working-age adults in Columbus, Ohio. The plan examines the issue, finds

    a vulnerable population, maps social factors, and establishes collaborative SMART objectives to

    be achieved in the subsequent educational session.

    Analysis of the Health Concern

    Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher are classified as having

    obesity (Emmerich et al., 2024). Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular

    disease, stroke, some types of cancer, and decreased quality of life (ODPHP, n.d.-a). Healthy

    People 2030 goal NWS-03 targets to decrease adult obesity to 36.0% (ODPHP, n.d.-b). The most

    recent age-adjusted estimate is 40.2% in 2021-2023, and the change is not significant (ODPHP,

    n.d.-b). August 2021 to August 2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data

    show 40.3% of adults with obesity, 46.4% of adults ages 40–59, and 9.4% with severe obesity

    (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    The maps of the 2024 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that all

    reporting states are at 25% or more (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025).

    The Midwest leads at 35.9%, and Ohio remains at or above 35% (CDC, 2025). In most states,

    Black and Hispanic adults have a higher rate of obesity compared to White and Asian adults and

    decreases with education (CDC, 2025). Clinicians are supposed to provide or make referrals to

    3

    adults with a BMI of 30 and above to intensive, multicomponent behavioral interventions (U.S.

    Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF], 2018). These programs result in an average weight

    loss of 1.56 kg among lower-income adults, with the greatest weight loss due to incentives and

    feedback (Li et al., 2024).

    This plan assumes attendees are contemplating change, will report usual intake and

    activity honestly, and will accept four-week follow-up. It assumes beverages, walking, and

    home-food changes can start without medication. Uncertainty remains: BMI imperfectly marks

    risk across groups, stigma can reduce attendance, and shift work plus food cost limit what one

    hour can change. Expected outcomes are skills and a first supported attempt, not a large

    immediate BMI drop.

    Target Population, Scenario, and Predisposing Factors

    The session is a 60-minute evening class at the Linden Community Recreation Center in

    Columbus, Ohio. After recruiting them by use of flyers, church bulletins, and two local work

    sites, eight community-dwelling adults will be invited. None of them reside in a hospital, assisted

    living, nursing home, or other institution.

    The sample consists of five females and three males aged 36-56 years. There are four

    non-Hispanic Black, two non-Hispanic White, and two Hispanic. Six evening or rotating shifts in

    warehousing, food service, or retail. Education ranges from a high school diploma to some

    college, and income is about $32,000–$54,000. Five have school-going children. It covers both

    Medicaid and high-deductible plans. BMI values range from 31 to 39. Daily sodas, late takeout,

    and fewer than 60 minutes of planned activity per week are common.

    4

    Tanya R. is a 47-year-old married non-Hispanic Black warehouse associate and mother

    of two who earns about $41,000. Her last BMI was 34.8 kg/m². Fasting glucose last year was in

    the prediabetes range, and her mother has type 2 diabetes. She does not eat breakfast, consumes a

    few sodas during working days, orders carryout most evenings, and has never maintained a food

    diary.

    This group is predisposed to obesity because rates peak in midlife and among adults

    without a bachelor’s degree (Emmerich et al., 2024). In most states that report, obesity is at 35%

    or more prevalent in Black adults (CDC, 2025). The adult rate is higher than the NWS-03 target

    in Ohio (CDC, 2025). Healthy habits and intensive treatment are limited by shift work, low

    access to evening groceries, the density of carryout, caregiving, and high deductibles (USPSTF,

    2018). A recreation center class can access those workers who do not visit a primary-care weight

    visit frequently.

    Sociogram Considerations and Learning Needs

    A sociogram will map ties that sustain energy-dense eating and inactivity and ties that

    could support change. Respondents will identify who they will eat with, who would not welcome

    change, and who would assist them in walking, cooking, or avoiding sugary beverages. Arrows

    will indicate influence to enable the nurse to recognize stars, isolates, and the work-versus-home

    split.

    Some of the risk ties are overtime to dinner, colleagues who share carryout, children who

    like packaged foods, local soda stores, and family members who consider second helpings as a

    sign of hospitality. Family history includes Tanya’s mother with diabetes. Protective

    5

    relationships consist of a walking spouse, a teen who is ready to pack lunches, the center

    coordinator, and a primary-care nurse.

    Participants know excess weight raises diabetes risk but cannot explain BMI categories or

    the 5%–7% prevention threshold (ODPHP, n.d.-a). They have not been practicing label reading

    and step goals and are unaware that there are local track hours and Diabetes Prevention Program

    cohorts. The session will educate on energy balance, compare carryout with packed lunch,

    practice a brief walk, finish the sociogram, and establish a single collaborative goal.

    Current Behaviors, Session Expectations, and Collaborative SMART Goals

    The current behaviors are daily sodas, frequent carryout, missed breakfast, minimal

    planned activity, and no log. The expectations include full attendance, truthful reporting,

    sociogram work, one teach-back, and at least one personal goal. Supports include plain-language

    visuals, a lunch comparison, a short track walk, printed logs, and a two-minute private goal talk.

    Agreed-upon goals matter because change lasts longer when participants help define

    success (MacLeod, 2012). MacLeod suggests specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and

    time-bound objectives, which are also engaging and rewarding. The cooperation between the

    desire to cook at home and the fear of rejected food or lost time of walking appears. Shared goals

    are the evaluation criteria for Assessment 4. Working with Tanya and the group produced the

    following SMART goals. By the end of the 60-minute session, each participant will state their

    current BMI category and list three personal triggers with one realistic substitute for each, shown

    on a worksheet and confirmed by teach-back.

    6

    1. Within seven days, at least six of eight participants will complete a three-day food-and-

    step log and identify one 30-minute walking block on four workdays, confirmed by

    follow-up contact.

    2. Within four weeks, each participant will replace sugar-sweetened beverages on at least

    five days each week and accumulate at least 150 minutes of moderate activity or 8,000

    steps on at least four days each week or will record a barrier and a revised plan.

    These goals follow assessment, counseling, skill practice, and self-monitoring (USPSTF,

    2018). They remain realistic because similar behavioral programs produce modest, measurable

    change (Li et al., 2024). The same goals will be used to evaluate the later educational session.

    7

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Adult obesity prevalence maps. U.S.

    Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-

    statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity

    prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023 (NCHS Data Brief No.

    508). National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281

    Li, P., Huang, Y., & Wong, A. (2024). Behavioural strategies to reduce obesity among lower

    socio-economic adults living in high-income countries: A Grades of Recommendation,

    Assessment, Development and Evaluation-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

    of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition, 131(3), 544–552.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940

    MacLeod, L. (2012). Making SMART goals smarter. Physician Executive, 38(2), 68–72.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-a). Overweight and obesity. Healthy

    People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-b). Reduce the proportion of adults

    with obesity (NWS-03). Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human

    Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). Behavioral weight loss interventions to prevent

    obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281](https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281)

    [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    8

    recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(11), 1163–1171.

    https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022

    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022)

    **## Assessment40604.docx**

    For this assessment, you will conclude the clinical learning activity you began in Assessment 1.
    **Please see attached**

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, the hypothetical health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1 to your fictitious audience. In this hypothetical scenario, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, evaluate the objectives of the plan, revise the plan as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you decide to

    **Develop a PowerPoint presentation with voice-over and speaker notes with script to communicate your plan.**

    Complete the following:

    ·
    **Prepare a 10–12 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes and script** that reflects your hypothetical presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well organized. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint tutorial). The transcript can be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the hypothetical face-to-face educational session addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the hypothetical participant(s) in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    Supporting Evidence

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references, published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    **## Assessment1-1.Attempt1.docx.pdf**

    1

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    September ,2026

    2

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    Adult obesity remains a leading community health concern because it increases chronic

    disease risk and reduces quality of life (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

    [ODPHP], n.d.-a). This hypothetical plan describes a 60-minute face-to-face session for

    community-dwelling working-age adults in Columbus, Ohio. The plan examines the issue, finds

    a vulnerable population, maps social factors, and establishes collaborative SMART objectives to

    be achieved in the subsequent educational session.

    Analysis of the Health Concern

    Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher are classified as having

    obesity (Emmerich et al., 2024). Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular

    disease, stroke, some types of cancer, and decreased quality of life (ODPHP, n.d.-a). Healthy

    People 2030 goal NWS-03 targets to decrease adult obesity to 36.0% (ODPHP, n.d.-b). The most

    recent age-adjusted estimate is 40.2% in 2021-2023, and the change is not significant (ODPHP,

    n.d.-b). August 2021 to August 2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data

    show 40.3% of adults with obesity, 46.4% of adults ages 40–59, and 9.4% with severe obesity

    (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    The maps of the 2024 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that all

    reporting states are at 25% or more (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025).

    The Midwest leads at 35.9%, and Ohio remains at or above 35% (CDC, 2025). In most states,

    Black and Hispanic adults have a higher rate of obesity compared to White and Asian adults and

    decreases with education (CDC, 2025). Clinicians are supposed to provide or make referrals to

    3

    adults with a BMI of 30 and above to intensive, multicomponent behavioral interventions (U.S.

    Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF], 2018). These programs result in an average weight

    loss of 1.56 kg among lower-income adults, with the greatest weight loss due to incentives and

    feedback (Li et al., 2024).

    This plan assumes attendees are contemplating change, will report usual intake and

    activity honestly, and will accept four-week follow-up. It assumes beverages, walking, and

    home-food changes can start without medication. Uncertainty remains: BMI imperfectly marks

    risk across groups, stigma can reduce attendance, and shift work plus food cost limit what one

    hour can change. Expected outcomes are skills and a first supported attempt, not a large

    immediate BMI drop.

    Target Population, Scenario, and Predisposing Factors

    The session is a 60-minute evening class at the Linden Community Recreation Center in

    Columbus, Ohio. After recruiting them by use of flyers, church bulletins, and two local work

    sites, eight community-dwelling adults will be invited. None of them reside in a hospital, assisted

    living, nursing home, or other institution.

    The sample consists of five females and three males aged 36-56 years. There are four

    non-Hispanic Black, two non-Hispanic White, and two Hispanic. Six evening or rotating shifts in

    warehousing, food service, or retail. Education ranges from a high school diploma to some

    college, and income is about $32,000–$54,000. Five have school-going children. It covers both

    Medicaid and high-deductible plans. BMI values range from 31 to 39. Daily sodas, late takeout,

    and fewer than 60 minutes of planned activity per week are common.

    4

    Tanya R. is a 47-year-old married non-Hispanic Black warehouse associate and mother

    of two who earns about $41,000. Her last BMI was 34.8 kg/m². Fasting glucose last year was in

    the prediabetes range, and her mother has type 2 diabetes. She does not eat breakfast, consumes a

    few sodas during working days, orders carryout most evenings, and has never maintained a food

    diary.

    This group is predisposed to obesity because rates peak in midlife and among adults

    without a bachelor’s degree (Emmerich et al., 2024). In most states that report, obesity is at 35%

    or more prevalent in Black adults (CDC, 2025). The adult rate is higher than the NWS-03 target

    in Ohio (CDC, 2025). Healthy habits and intensive treatment are limited by shift work, low

    access to evening groceries, the density of carryout, caregiving, and high deductibles (USPSTF,

    2018). A recreation center class can access those workers who do not visit a primary-care weight

    visit frequently.

    Sociogram Considerations and Learning Needs

    A sociogram will map ties that sustain energy-dense eating and inactivity and ties that

    could support change. Respondents will identify who they will eat with, who would not welcome

    change, and who would assist them in walking, cooking, or avoiding sugary beverages. Arrows

    will indicate influence to enable the nurse to recognize stars, isolates, and the work-versus-home

    split.

    Some of the risk ties are overtime to dinner, colleagues who share carryout, children who

    like packaged foods, local soda stores, and family members who consider second helpings as a

    sign of hospitality. Family history includes Tanya’s mother with diabetes. Protective

    5

    relationships consist of a walking spouse, a teen who is ready to pack lunches, the center

    coordinator, and a primary-care nurse.

    Participants know excess weight raises diabetes risk but cannot explain BMI categories or

    the 5%–7% prevention threshold (ODPHP, n.d.-a). They have not been practicing label reading

    and step goals and are unaware that there are local track hours and Diabetes Prevention Program

    cohorts. The session will educate on energy balance, compare carryout with packed lunch,

    practice a brief walk, finish the sociogram, and establish a single collaborative goal.

    Current Behaviors, Session Expectations, and Collaborative SMART Goals

    The current behaviors are daily sodas, frequent carryout, missed breakfast, minimal

    planned activity, and no log. The expectations include full attendance, truthful reporting,

    sociogram work, one teach-back, and at least one personal goal. Supports include plain-language

    visuals, a lunch comparison, a short track walk, printed logs, and a two-minute private goal talk.

    Agreed-upon goals matter because change lasts longer when participants help define

    success (MacLeod, 2012). MacLeod suggests specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and

    time-bound objectives, which are also engaging and rewarding. The cooperation between the

    desire to cook at home and the fear of rejected food or lost time of walking appears. Shared goals

    are the evaluation criteria for Assessment 4. Working with Tanya and the group produced the

    following SMART goals. By the end of the 60-minute session, each participant will state their

    current BMI category and list three personal triggers with one realistic substitute for each, shown

    on a worksheet and confirmed by teach-back.

    6

    1. Within seven days, at least six of eight participants will complete a three-day food-and-

    step log and identify one 30-minute walking block on four workdays, confirmed by

    follow-up contact.

    2. Within four weeks, each participant will replace sugar-sweetened beverages on at least

    five days each week and accumulate at least 150 minutes of moderate activity or 8,000

    steps on at least four days each week or will record a barrier and a revised plan.

    These goals follow assessment, counseling, skill practice, and self-monitoring (USPSTF,

    2018). They remain realistic because similar behavioral programs produce modest, measurable

    change (Li et al., 2024). The same goals will be used to evaluate the later educational session.

    7

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Adult obesity prevalence maps. U.S.

    Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-

    statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity

    prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023 (NCHS Data Brief No.

    508). National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281

    Li, P., Huang, Y., & Wong, A. (2024). Behavioural strategies to reduce obesity among lower

    socio-economic adults living in high-income countries: A Grades of Recommendation,

    Assessment, Development and Evaluation-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

    of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition, 131(3), 544–552.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940

    MacLeod, L. (2012). Making SMART goals smarter. Physician Executive, 38(2), 68–72.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-a). Overweight and obesity. Healthy

    People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-b). Reduce the proportion of adults

    with obesity (NWS-03). Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human

    Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). Behavioral weight loss interventions to prevent

    obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281](https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281)

    [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    8

    recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(11), 1163–1171.

    https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022

    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022)

    **## Assessment40604.docx**

    For this assessment, you will conclude the clinical learning activity you began in Assessment 1.
    **Please see attached**

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, the hypothetical health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1 to your fictitious audience. In this hypothetical scenario, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, evaluate the objectives of the plan, revise the plan as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you decide to

    **Develop a PowerPoint presentation with voice-over and speaker notes with script to communicate your plan.**

    Complete the following:

    ·
    **Prepare a 10–12 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes and script** that reflects your hypothetical presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well organized. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint tutorial). The transcript can be submitted on a separate Word document.

    · Simulate the hypothetical face-to-face educational session addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.

    · Imagine collaborating with the hypothetical participant(s) in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    Supporting Evidence

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references, published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    **## Assessment1-1.Attempt1.docx.pdf**

    1

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    September ,2026

    2

    Health Promotion Plan: Adult Obesity in a Columbus, Ohio Community Group

    Adult obesity remains a leading community health concern because it increases chronic

    disease risk and reduces quality of life (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

    [ODPHP], n.d.-a). This hypothetical plan describes a 60-minute face-to-face session for

    community-dwelling working-age adults in Columbus, Ohio. The plan examines the issue, finds

    a vulnerable population, maps social factors, and establishes collaborative SMART objectives to

    be achieved in the subsequent educational session.

    Analysis of the Health Concern

    Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher are classified as having

    obesity (Emmerich et al., 2024). Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular

    disease, stroke, some types of cancer, and decreased quality of life (ODPHP, n.d.-a). Healthy

    People 2030 goal NWS-03 targets to decrease adult obesity to 36.0% (ODPHP, n.d.-b). The most

    recent age-adjusted estimate is 40.2% in 2021-2023, and the change is not significant (ODPHP,

    n.d.-b). August 2021 to August 2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data

    show 40.3% of adults with obesity, 46.4% of adults ages 40–59, and 9.4% with severe obesity

    (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    The maps of the 2024 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that all

    reporting states are at 25% or more (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025).

    The Midwest leads at 35.9%, and Ohio remains at or above 35% (CDC, 2025). In most states,

    Black and Hispanic adults have a higher rate of obesity compared to White and Asian adults and

    decreases with education (CDC, 2025). Clinicians are supposed to provide or make referrals to

    3

    adults with a BMI of 30 and above to intensive, multicomponent behavioral interventions (U.S.

    Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF], 2018). These programs result in an average weight

    loss of 1.56 kg among lower-income adults, with the greatest weight loss due to incentives and

    feedback (Li et al., 2024).

    This plan assumes attendees are contemplating change, will report usual intake and

    activity honestly, and will accept four-week follow-up. It assumes beverages, walking, and

    home-food changes can start without medication. Uncertainty remains: BMI imperfectly marks

    risk across groups, stigma can reduce attendance, and shift work plus food cost limit what one

    hour can change. Expected outcomes are skills and a first supported attempt, not a large

    immediate BMI drop.

    Target Population, Scenario, and Predisposing Factors

    The session is a 60-minute evening class at the Linden Community Recreation Center in

    Columbus, Ohio. After recruiting them by use of flyers, church bulletins, and two local work

    sites, eight community-dwelling adults will be invited. None of them reside in a hospital, assisted

    living, nursing home, or other institution.

    The sample consists of five females and three males aged 36-56 years. There are four

    non-Hispanic Black, two non-Hispanic White, and two Hispanic. Six evening or rotating shifts in

    warehousing, food service, or retail. Education ranges from a high school diploma to some

    college, and income is about $32,000–$54,000. Five have school-going children. It covers both

    Medicaid and high-deductible plans. BMI values range from 31 to 39. Daily sodas, late takeout,

    and fewer than 60 minutes of planned activity per week are common.

    4

    Tanya R. is a 47-year-old married non-Hispanic Black warehouse associate and mother

    of two who earns about $41,000. Her last BMI was 34.8 kg/m². Fasting glucose last year was in

    the prediabetes range, and her mother has type 2 diabetes. She does not eat breakfast, consumes a

    few sodas during working days, orders carryout most evenings, and has never maintained a food

    diary.

    This group is predisposed to obesity because rates peak in midlife and among adults

    without a bachelor’s degree (Emmerich et al., 2024). In most states that report, obesity is at 35%

    or more prevalent in Black adults (CDC, 2025). The adult rate is higher than the NWS-03 target

    in Ohio (CDC, 2025). Healthy habits and intensive treatment are limited by shift work, low

    access to evening groceries, the density of carryout, caregiving, and high deductibles (USPSTF,

    2018). A recreation center class can access those workers who do not visit a primary-care weight

    visit frequently.

    Sociogram Considerations and Learning Needs

    A sociogram will map ties that sustain energy-dense eating and inactivity and ties that

    could support change. Respondents will identify who they will eat with, who would not welcome

    change, and who would assist them in walking, cooking, or avoiding sugary beverages. Arrows

    will indicate influence to enable the nurse to recognize stars, isolates, and the work-versus-home

    split.

    Some of the risk ties are overtime to dinner, colleagues who share carryout, children who

    like packaged foods, local soda stores, and family members who consider second helpings as a

    sign of hospitality. Family history includes Tanya’s mother with diabetes. Protective

    5

    relationships consist of a walking spouse, a teen who is ready to pack lunches, the center

    coordinator, and a primary-care nurse.

    Participants know excess weight raises diabetes risk but cannot explain BMI categories or

    the 5%–7% prevention threshold (ODPHP, n.d.-a). They have not been practicing label reading

    and step goals and are unaware that there are local track hours and Diabetes Prevention Program

    cohorts. The session will educate on energy balance, compare carryout with packed lunch,

    practice a brief walk, finish the sociogram, and establish a single collaborative goal.

    Current Behaviors, Session Expectations, and Collaborative SMART Goals

    The current behaviors are daily sodas, frequent carryout, missed breakfast, minimal

    planned activity, and no log. The expectations include full attendance, truthful reporting,

    sociogram work, one teach-back, and at least one personal goal. Supports include plain-language

    visuals, a lunch comparison, a short track walk, printed logs, and a two-minute private goal talk.

    Agreed-upon goals matter because change lasts longer when participants help define

    success (MacLeod, 2012). MacLeod suggests specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and

    time-bound objectives, which are also engaging and rewarding. The cooperation between the

    desire to cook at home and the fear of rejected food or lost time of walking appears. Shared goals

    are the evaluation criteria for Assessment 4. Working with Tanya and the group produced the

    following SMART goals. By the end of the 60-minute session, each participant will state their

    current BMI category and list three personal triggers with one realistic substitute for each, shown

    on a worksheet and confirmed by teach-back.

    6

    1. Within seven days, at least six of eight participants will complete a three-day food-and-

    step log and identify one 30-minute walking block on four workdays, confirmed by

    follow-up contact.

    2. Within four weeks, each participant will replace sugar-sweetened beverages on at least

    five days each week and accumulate at least 150 minutes of moderate activity or 8,000

    steps on at least four days each week or will record a barrier and a revised plan.

    These goals follow assessment, counseling, skill practice, and self-monitoring (USPSTF,

    2018). They remain realistic because similar behavioral programs produce modest, measurable

    change (Li et al., 2024). The same goals will be used to evaluate the later educational session.

    7

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Adult obesity prevalence maps. U.S.

    Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-

    statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity

    prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023 (NCHS Data Brief No.

    508). National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281

    Li, P., Huang, Y., & Wong, A. (2024). Behavioural strategies to reduce obesity among lower

    socio-economic adults living in high-income countries: A Grades of Recommendation,

    Assessment, Development and Evaluation-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

    of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition, 131(3), 544–552.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940

    MacLeod, L. (2012). Making SMART goals smarter. Physician Executive, 38(2), 68–72.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-a). Overweight and obesity. Healthy

    People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.-b). Reduce the proportion of adults

    with obesity (NWS-03). Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human

    Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-

    objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). Behavioral weight loss interventions to prevent

    obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    [https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281](https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281)

    [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001940)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    [https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03](https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03)

    8

    recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(11), 1163–1171.

    https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022

    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13022)

  • [Solved] Map Concept –

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    DFC Concept Map Instructions Level 2 Use a simulator patient Concept Map Assignment Instructions – Levels 2 and 3 Concept maps allow you to organize and display key information in a way that you can see how information is connected and interrelated. The DFC Concept Map Assignments in this course all…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    DFC Concept Map Instructions Level 2

    Use a simulator patient

    Concept Map Assignment Instructions – Levels 2 and 3

    Concept maps allow you to organize and display key information in a way that you can see how information is connected and interrelated. The DFC Concept Map Assignments in this course allow you to extract key client information and practice clinical judgment using DFC or VCBC clients. Choose a concept from the Concepts for Nursing Practice eBook (found under your course eBooks) that relates to the patient you selected. You must choose a different concept for each of your concept map assignments.

    DFC Concept Map goal:

    The purpose of this assignment is to provide the learner an opportunity to strengthen their clinical judgment using a concept map format. Use the attached rubric for map requirements to ensure you receive full credit.

    Divider.png

    Instructions:

    1. Choose your map concept:

    Choose a concept from the Concepts for Nursing Practice eBook (found under your course eBooks) that relates to the patient you selected.

    2. Choose a client that aligns with your chosen concept.

    You can use a current client, a past encounter, or a simulated experience if needed.

    You can use a concept only once per course.

    3. Complete the client information section and the topic of the map.

    Use SBAR format for the client information. Visit the ELO to learn more. SBAR includes:

    Situation

    Situation states what is currently happening with the patient. It usually begins with the identity of the person communicating the SBAR, patient identifiers such as age and gender, and a brief statement of the current problem or situation.

    Background

    Background covers clinical background such as patient history related to the current situation, signs and symptoms of the presenting complaint, and any test results, such as lab or imaging reports.

    Assessment

    Assessment reports what the person communicating the SBAR thinks the problem is. It states what the nurse or other provider has assessed based on the background information, patient history, and observations.

    Recommendation

    Recommendations and Requests states an initial recommendation, what is needed and when, and repeats back the stated response from the other provider or patient to ensure accuracy.

    The topic of the map is your chosen concept. This might not always be the client’s primary concern.

    For example, if your chosen concept is ‘Mobility’, focus on cues and interventions related to ‘Mobility’ even if the client has a higher priority concern (such as ‘Perfusion’.) Concepts are often interrelated, but you should maintain the focus of the map on the chosen concept.

    4. Build your Clinical Judgment Concept Map.

    Locate and download the concept map template within the ‘DFC Concept Map’ module.

    Complete all boxes for your client.

    Use the assignment rubric to ensure you meet the requirements of the assignment.

    The arrows on the template are there to remind you that this map is intended to be completed in a certain order.

    What is a hypothesis?

    A hypothesis is a proposed explanation made on the basis of available information. It is a starting point to problem-solving.

    Recognize cues: Based on available client data, identify relevant or important cues or information. Subjective and objective could be considered. Specific client values are included where appropriate (i.e. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc).

    Analyze cues: Link identified cues to the client’s presentation. Determine conditions that are consistent with those cues.

    A condition is defined as “a normal state with regard to one's health, such as pregnancy, or to a disease, disorder, illness, or injury” (National Institutes of Health, n.d.).

    Prioritize hypotheses: Think “Where do I start?” Based on your analysis of the client’s condition, determine which explanations are most likely. List and rank hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order.

    Generate solutions: Using the hypothesis, identify desirable outcomes for the client. Goals are listed in SMART format.

    In SMART format, goals are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound. Visit the ELO for more information.

    Here is an example of a SMART goal: The patient will report a pain level of 4 or less on a 0-10 scale within 30 minutes of pain medication administration.

    Take action: Using the identified SMART goals, identify and describe how nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. Interventions will address the priority concerns and are designed to help meet the client’s goals.

    Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1.

    Evaluate outcomes: Compare observed outcomes against expected outcomes. Determine if your identified interventions were effective.

    Be sure that these evaluative statements are in past tense, as you are seeing how the interventions progressed. This should look like "The (goal was achieved) by (time specified) as evidenced by (supporting findings) after (nursing intervention was performed)."

    You are evaluating if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified.

    *To reiterate: SMART goal #1, Intervention #1, and Evaluation #1 should all be related. This should be repeated for all goals and their associated interventions and outcomes.

    – [\
    \
    DFCConceptMapTemplateLevel2-Unlocked.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dfcconceptmaptemplatelevel2-unlocked-docx "DFCConceptMapTemplateLevel2-Unlocked.docx")

  • [Solved] Wk4 foc sp

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing, diagnosing, and treating mood disorders. – Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing, diagnosing, and treating mood disorders.
    – Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.
    – Review the video, _Case Study: Petunia Park_ . You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.
    – Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
    – Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
    – Consider patient diagnostics missing from the video: **Provider Review outside of interview:**

    **Temp** 98.2 **Pulse** 90 **Respiration** 18 **B/P** 138/88

    **Laboratory Data Available**: Urine drug and alcohol screen negative.  CBC within normal ranges, CMP within normal ranges. Lipid panel within normal ranges. Prolactin Level 8; TSH 6.3 (H)

    – a month ago