Tag: Care Plans, Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

  • [Solved] Post- streptococcal Glomerulonephritis (PSGN)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Post- streptococcal Glomerulonephritis (PSGN).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (2)** – ## ActiveLearningAssignment.docx – Screenshot2025-07-131706141.jpg **## ActiveLearningAssignment.docx** Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper** **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and ve…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ActiveLearningAssignment.docx

    – Screenshot2025-07-131706141.jpg

    **## ActiveLearningAssignment.docx**

    Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment

    **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper**

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline. DO NOT EMAIL ME your topic.**

    **1. Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE**

    ·
    **Choose a Meaningful Issue:** Identify a significant issue in your field (for example, a nursing challenge, leadership dilemma, or a specific patient-care decision-making process). Your topic should be both relevant and complex enough to support an in-depth analysis in your final paper.

    ·
    **Topic Approval:** Make sure your selected topic is approved by your instructor before proceeding to begin work on your final submission. This approval ensures that your subject matter is appropriate and focused.

    **2. Develop Your Thesis Statement**

    ·
    **Craft a Clear Thesis:** Write a concise thesis statement that conveys the main argument or primary inquiry your final paper will address. Your thesis should hint at the multidimensional decision-making approaches and leadership strategies you plan to explore.

    **3. Outline the Structure of Your Paper**

    Your outline should provide a clear roadmap of your paper. Use APA-style level headings and subheadings to reflect the organization. Consider including the following sections:

    ·
    **I. Introduction**

    ·
    **A. Background Information:** Introduce the broad topic and its significance to your field.

    ·
    **B. Statement of the Problem:** Describe the key issue or challenge that your paper will address.

    ·
    **C. Thesis Statement:** Present your central argument or purpose.

    ·
    **II. Literature Review/Background**

    ·
    **A. Overview of Existing Research:** Provide a brief summary of scholarly research relevant to your topic.

    ·
    **B. Key Theories and Models:** Identify and describe the major theories or decision-making models that will inform your analysis [minimum 2].

    ·
    **III. Main Body/Discussion**

    ·
    **A. Section One – Topic Analysis or Context:** Outline the first major point or perspective you plan to examine.

    · Subpoints: Include supporting evidence or examples.

    ·
    **B. Section Two – Comparative Analysis:** Detail how different decision-making approaches or leadership styles impact the issue.

    · Subpoints: Compare the bedside nurse’s approaches with those of advanced practice nurses or nurse leaders.

    ·
    **C. Section Three – Application and Implications:** Explain how the chosen models or theories could be applied in practical settings, using specific examples or case studies.

    · Subpoints: Describe potential benefits, limitations, and recommendations.

    ·
    **IV. Conclusion**

    ·
    **A. Summary of Key Points:** Recap the main sections of your outline.

    ·
    **B. Implications and Next Steps:** Highlight how your final paper will synthesize the information and propose possible solutions or recommendations.

    **V. Preliminary References**[5 required for full credit in this assignment]

    · Include a short list of scholarly sources you plan to use. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

    · Include a short list of key scholarly sources that will support your research and analysis in the full paper. Follow APA 7th Edition formatting.

    See visual sample below:

    **4. Formatting and Submission Requirements**

    ·
    **Formatting:**

    · Use APA 7th Edition guidelines for heading levels, in-text citations (if applicable), and your reference list.

    · The outline can be presented in a combination of narrative paragraphs and bullet points. Ensure your formatting is clear and easy to follow.

    · Your topic and outline submission may be a concise document (typically 2-3 pages)- DO NOT EXCEED THIS as this is NOT your PAPER- I will STOP reading at PAGE 3 [reference page and cover page DO NOT COUNT].

    ·
    **Structure:**

    ·
    **Title Page:** Although this is a preliminary outline, follow any institutional guidelines regarding the inclusion of a title page.

    ·
    **Clear Headings:** Use clear, descriptive headings and subheadings that mirror the structure of your eventual paper.

    ·
    **Page Organization:** Though the outline does not need to be lengthy, it should provide a logical sequence of ideas that can be expanded later into a full paper.

    ·
    **Review the Grading Rubric:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric carefully to ensure that your outline meets all the specified elements (e.g., clarity of topic, logical organization, relevance of sections, APA formatting).

    **5. Final Checks and Submission**

    ·
    **Proofread:** Ensure your outline is free of grammatical and formatting errors.

    ·
    **Clarity and Focus:** Verify that each section of your outline clearly supports your thesis and that the topics flow logically from one section to the next.

    ·
    **Submission:** Submit your topic and outline by the assigned due date through the appropriate course submission portal. Remember, this outline is solely to help you structure your thoughts and will be approved before you proceed with your final paper.

    **Here is a great resource on how to write an outline [please review]:** [**How to write an outline**](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-outline/)

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline**

    Please access the assignment tab and/or read below and begin working on the Shared Decision Paper due week 7 – Saturday by 1159 PM EST. No Late assignments will be accepted.

    **The following is the instructions for the assignment- REMEMBER ONLY THE OUTLINE/Topic is due this week.**

    **Decision-Making Process Paper**

    Instructions

    In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper [excluding cover and reference pages] identifying, comparing, and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing. The topic
    **MUST BE APPROVED and selected from the list below before writing the writing begins.**

    You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include the title page or reference page. Reflect on your decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken by nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision-making within issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

    1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature. Additionally, this should include a thorough literature review that provides a good understanding of what the cause of this problem is and what is suggested to address this problem. Essentially, this review must support your choices of decision-making models and this needs to include how all levels of nursing practice (the bedside nurse to the APN are impacted by the problem).

    2. Identify how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse, and an Advanced practice nurse (CNO or NP) to address your selected issue using at least 2 [3 ideal]  different decision-making approaches that are supported by the literature review. This must first include a detailed analysis/overview of the selected decision-making models and how they are used in practice. Then a detailed analysis of how these decision-making approaches/models would address the problem/along with a detailed analysis of how each of the three selected models would be applied to address the selected issue/problem making sure to incorporate this at all levels of practice. One of the decision-making models may be more applicable to the bedside nurse; whereas the other is more applicable to the APN; however, all levels of nursing practice need to be addressed with at least one of the chosen 3 decision-making models. However, this does not mean that each decision-making model will apply to all levels of practice only that this discussion needs to include how each level of nursing practice would utilize the decision-making model to address the problem. For instance, one decision-making model may apply to the bedside nurse; the second decision-making model may be more applicable at the level of APN (CNO, NP, etc) and the other decision-making model may be best applied to the nurse manager. This section should be detailed; meaning specific, well thought out, realistic solutions of how the nurse (at the level identified; this may include more than one level for the same decision-making model or not) would address the problem using the decision-making model is provided and well supported by the literature. of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed by course readings, literature, clinical scenarios, and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.

    3. Prioritize the best decision-making approach/model to address the selected problem that is grounded in best practice. This should provide a well-supported rationale for this choice that includes a good comparison and contrast of the 3 chosen decision-making models that clearly illustrate why the choice was made, that is consistent with the decision-making model, and how it would address the chosen topic or problem.

    4. Identify a possible funding source that would address your approach to solving the problem. For instance, if the best approach to solving the nurse-to-patient ratio problem is through the use of SDM and shared governance, perhaps you may seek a local funding source to provide you with funding to implement a small EBP or research project that would be funded by a local nursing organization such as Sigma Theta Tau or perhaps if it was geared more towards assessing the value of this model towards NP in practice than seeking a local organization that supports funding for projects being implemented by practicing NP? If seeking money for research this would need to be overseen by a nurse with a DNP or a PhD or someone with the credentials to do so that are part of their scope of practice. Consider looking at federal, state, or local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this needs to be specifically applied with sufficient details

    5. Use at least
    **10 current scholarly references** [not older than 5 years] other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting.

    **Here is a SAMPLE OUTLINE- DIABETES IN NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC.**

    **Sample Outline: Pediatric Diabetes as a Nursing Issue Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Brief overview of pediatric diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 in children).

    · Statement of significance: why pediatric diabetes is a critical nursing issue across all levels of practice.

    · Preview of key themes: prevalence, causes, systemlevel impact, and decisionmaking approaches.

    **II. Background and Significance of the Problem**

    **A. Overview of Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Definition and differentiation of Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes in children.

    · Pathophysiology and unique considerations in pediatric populations.

    **B. Impact Across Nursing Levels**

    · How bedside nurses, nurse managers, and advanced practice nurses encounter and manage pediatric diabetes.

    · Why this issue requires coordinated action across the nursing continuum.

    **III. Literature Review: Causes, Contributing Factors, and Recommended Interventions**

    **A. Etiology and Contributing Factors**

    · Genetic predisposition, autoimmune mechanisms, environmental triggers.

    · Lifestyle and social determinants influencing pediatric Type 2 diabetes.

    · Psychosocial and developmental considerations.

    **B. Consequences of Poorly Managed Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Acute complications (DKA, hypoglycemia).

    · Longterm risks (cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, neuropathy).

    · Family burden and qualityoflife implications.

    **C. EvidenceBased Interventions**

    · Recommended clinical management strategies.

    · Familycentered education and selfmanagement support.

    · Schoolbased diabetes management programs.

    · Technologyassisted monitoring (CGMs, insulin pumps).

    **IV. DecisionMaking Models (Three Models Required)**

    **A. Overview of Selected DecisionMaking Models**

    ·
    **Shared DecisionMaking (SDM) Model** Description, theoretical foundation, and relevance to pediatric care.

    ·
    **Clinical Judgment Model (Tanner or NCSBN)** Description and application in acute and chronic pediatric management.

    ·
    **Transformational Leadership DecisionMaking Model** Description and relevance for nurse leaders and APNs.

    **V. Application of DecisionMaking Models to the Problem**

    **A. Bedside/Staff Nurse**

    · Use of the
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to assess symptoms, monitor glucose, prevent complications, and educate families.

    · Use of
    **Shared DecisionMaking** to involve parents and children in daily care routines.

    **B. Nurse Leader/Manager**

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to implement unitwide diabetes protocols, staff training, and qualityimprovement initiatives.

    · Use of
    **SDM** to support familycentered care policies.

    **C. Advanced Practice Nurse (NP or CNO)**

    · Use of
    **SDM** to develop individualized care plans and longterm management strategies.

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to advocate for institutional resources, community partnerships, and policy changes.

    · Use of
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to guide diagnostic reasoning and treatment adjustments.

    **VI. Comparison and Prioritization of DecisionMaking Models**

    · Compare strengths and limitations of each model.

    · Identify which model is most effective for addressing pediatric diabetes across settings.

    · Provide rationale grounded in evidence (e.g., SDM may be prioritized due to the need for family engagement and longterm adherence).

    **VII. Funding Source for Proposed Approach**

    · Identify a realistic funding source (e.g., HRSA, CDC, NIH, local children’s health foundations, Sigma Theta Tau).

    · Explain why this source aligns with the proposed intervention or improvement project.

    · Describe how funds would be used (training, technology, education programs, QI initiatives).

    **VIII. Conclusion**

    · Summarize the significance of pediatric diabetes as a nursing issue.

    · Reinforce the importance of coordinated decisionmaking across all nursing levels.

    · Emphasize the potential impact of the prioritized decisionmaking model on patient outcomes, family engagement, and systemlevel improvements.

    **Your TOPIC must be selected from the list below:**

    **🤖 Artificial Intelligence & Clinical Decision Support**

    1.
    **Algorithmic Bias in Triage:** Deciding when to override AI predictive risk scores that under-rank deterioration risk in racially diverse or marginalized patient populations.

    2.
    **Liability & Accountability:** Navigating legal and clinical accountability when an APRN follows an automated clinical decision support tool that results in an adverse outcome.

    3.
    **Ambient AI Documentation Protocols:** Balancing privacy consent, liability, and audit trails when deploying real-time ambient AI listening tools during sensitive patient consultations.

    4.
    **Predictive Analytics in Palliative Care:** Decision-making framework for integrating AI mortality-prediction algorithms into goals-of-care conversations without causing premature withdrawal of treatment.

    5.
    **APRN Oversight of Autonomous AI Diagnostics:** Protocols for APRN validation vs. override of autonomous AI diagnostic systems (e.g., automated AI diabetic retinopathy screening or AI radiology pre-reads).

    **📱 Digital Health & Innovation**

    1.
    **Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Alert Fatigue:** Structuring APRN decision-making protocols to filter high-volume RPM telemetry data and reduce liability/alert fatigue while maintaining safety.

    2.
    **Hospital-at-Home Inclusion Criteria:** Establishing risk-stratification criteria for identifying acute-care patients safe for Hospital-at-Home models versus those needing physical ICU/floor admission.

    3.
    **Digital Health Equity Barriers:** Clinical decision-making frameworks for remote care management when patients lack digital literacy, stable broadband, or compatible cellular hardware.

    4.
    **Virtual Nursing Delegation Models:** Determining task-allocation limits and clinical boundaries when integrating virtual nurses into bedside acute-care teams during code blue or rapid response events.

    5.
    **Wearable Device Data Integration:** Establishing clinical threshold guidelines for acting on unvalidated consumer health wearable data (e.g., smartwatches) brought in by patients.

    **🩺 Advanced Practice Nursing & Clinical Governance**

    1.
    **GLP-1 Medication Prioritization & Scarcity:** Formulating ethical allocation criteria when prescribing GLP-1 receptor agonists amidst severe supply chain shortages or restrictive insurance coverage.

    2.
    **Scope of Practice Transition:** Decision-making frameworks for APRNs transitioning from collaborative agreements to full practice authority in rural or medically underserved regions.

    3.
    **Value-Based Care vs. Fee-for-Service Dilemmas:** Balancing institutional pressure for volume-driven patient turnover against quality metrics in APRN-led specialty clinics.

    4.
    **Off-Label Prescribing Governance:** Establishing institutional criteria and evidence-based decision matrices for off-label APRN prescribing in complex or refractory conditions.

    5.
    **Collaborative Agreement Restructuring:** Formulating APRN leadership strategies to negotiate hospital credentialing and privileging rights during health system mergers.

    **👥 Workforce, Safety & Organizational Leadership**

    1.
    **Second Victim Support Systems:** Developing standardized peer-support and duty-assignment protocols for clinicians immediately following a severe catastrophic medical error.

    2.
    **Diagnostic Overconfidence & Cognitive Bias:** Implementing multidisciplinary peer-review tools designed to interrupt diagnostic momentum and anchor bias in high-acuity settings.

    3.
    **Workforce Allocation During Critical Shortages:** Ethical decision-making frameworks for crisis-standards-of-care staffing allocations when traveler/agency coverage is unavailable.

    4.
    **Disruptive Behavior & Safety Culture:** Navigating administrative action vs. retention strategies when addressing high-performing but clinically disruptive medical or nursing staff.

    5.
    **Cross-Training Deployment Criteria:** Establishing competency verification matrices before reassigning non-ICU nurses to step-down or critical care units during surge capacity events.

    **🌍 Population Health & Emerging Healthcare Systems**

    1.
    **Severe Maternal Morbidity Protocols:** Designing rapid-response decision trees for non-obstetric emergency departments treating post-partum complications.

    2.
    **Polypharmacy Deprescribing Cascades:** Decision matrices for systematically tapering high-risk medications in frail, multi-morbid geriatric patients with conflicting clinical practice guidelines.

    3.
    **Psychiatric ED Boarding & Divert Decisions:** Formulating clinical placement protocols for managing long-stay psychiatric patients occupying acute ED beds under strict resource constraints.

    4.
    **Financial Toxicity Mitigation:** Integrating real-time out-of-pocket cost considerations into clinical treatment planning without compromising evidence-based standard of care.

    5.
    **Antimicrobial Stewardship Conflict Resolution:** Navigating decision-making when APRN antimicrobial stewardship protocols conflict with attending physician preferences in high-risk patients.

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    Press Alt + F10 to access toolbar options

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **Screenshot2025-07-131706141.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-07-131706141-jpg)

    **Screenshot2025-07-131706141.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-07-131706141-jpg)

    **## ActiveLearningAssignment.docx**

    Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment

    **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper**

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline. DO NOT EMAIL ME your topic.**

    **1. Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE**

    ·
    **Choose a Meaningful Issue:** Identify a significant issue in your field (for example, a nursing challenge, leadership dilemma, or a specific patient-care decision-making process). Your topic should be both relevant and complex enough to support an in-depth analysis in your final paper.

    ·
    **Topic Approval:** Make sure your selected topic is approved by your instructor before proceeding to begin work on your final submission. This approval ensures that your subject matter is appropriate and focused.

    **2. Develop Your Thesis Statement**

    ·
    **Craft a Clear Thesis:** Write a concise thesis statement that conveys the main argument or primary inquiry your final paper will address. Your thesis should hint at the multidimensional decision-making approaches and leadership strategies you plan to explore.

    **3. Outline the Structure of Your Paper**

    Your outline should provide a clear roadmap of your paper. Use APA-style level headings and subheadings to reflect the organization. Consider including the following sections:

    ·
    **I. Introduction**

    ·
    **A. Background Information:** Introduce the broad topic and its significance to your field.

    ·
    **B. Statement of the Problem:** Describe the key issue or challenge that your paper will address.

    ·
    **C. Thesis Statement:** Present your central argument or purpose.

    ·
    **II. Literature Review/Background**

    ·
    **A. Overview of Existing Research:** Provide a brief summary of scholarly research relevant to your topic.

    ·
    **B. Key Theories and Models:** Identify and describe the major theories or decision-making models that will inform your analysis [minimum 2].

    ·
    **III. Main Body/Discussion**

    ·
    **A. Section One – Topic Analysis or Context:** Outline the first major point or perspective you plan to examine.

    · Subpoints: Include supporting evidence or examples.

    ·
    **B. Section Two – Comparative Analysis:** Detail how different decision-making approaches or leadership styles impact the issue.

    · Subpoints: Compare the bedside nurse’s approaches with those of advanced practice nurses or nurse leaders.

    ·
    **C. Section Three – Application and Implications:** Explain how the chosen models or theories could be applied in practical settings, using specific examples or case studies.

    · Subpoints: Describe potential benefits, limitations, and recommendations.

    ·
    **IV. Conclusion**

    ·
    **A. Summary of Key Points:** Recap the main sections of your outline.

    ·
    **B. Implications and Next Steps:** Highlight how your final paper will synthesize the information and propose possible solutions or recommendations.

    **V. Preliminary References**[5 required for full credit in this assignment]

    · Include a short list of scholarly sources you plan to use. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

    · Include a short list of key scholarly sources that will support your research and analysis in the full paper. Follow APA 7th Edition formatting.

    See visual sample below:

    **4. Formatting and Submission Requirements**

    ·
    **Formatting:**

    · Use APA 7th Edition guidelines for heading levels, in-text citations (if applicable), and your reference list.

    · The outline can be presented in a combination of narrative paragraphs and bullet points. Ensure your formatting is clear and easy to follow.

    · Your topic and outline submission may be a concise document (typically 2-3 pages)- DO NOT EXCEED THIS as this is NOT your PAPER- I will STOP reading at PAGE 3 [reference page and cover page DO NOT COUNT].

    ·
    **Structure:**

    ·
    **Title Page:** Although this is a preliminary outline, follow any institutional guidelines regarding the inclusion of a title page.

    ·
    **Clear Headings:** Use clear, descriptive headings and subheadings that mirror the structure of your eventual paper.

    ·
    **Page Organization:** Though the outline does not need to be lengthy, it should provide a logical sequence of ideas that can be expanded later into a full paper.

    ·
    **Review the Grading Rubric:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric carefully to ensure that your outline meets all the specified elements (e.g., clarity of topic, logical organization, relevance of sections, APA formatting).

    **5. Final Checks and Submission**

    ·
    **Proofread:** Ensure your outline is free of grammatical and formatting errors.

    ·
    **Clarity and Focus:** Verify that each section of your outline clearly supports your thesis and that the topics flow logically from one section to the next.

    ·
    **Submission:** Submit your topic and outline by the assigned due date through the appropriate course submission portal. Remember, this outline is solely to help you structure your thoughts and will be approved before you proceed with your final paper.

    **Here is a great resource on how to write an outline [please review]:** [**How to write an outline**](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-outline/)

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline**

    Please access the assignment tab and/or read below and begin working on the Shared Decision Paper due week 7 – Saturday by 1159 PM EST. No Late assignments will be accepted.

    **The following is the instructions for the assignment- REMEMBER ONLY THE OUTLINE/Topic is due this week.**

    **Decision-Making Process Paper**

    Instructions

    In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper [excluding cover and reference pages] identifying, comparing, and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing. The topic
    **MUST BE APPROVED and selected from the list below before writing the writing begins.**

    You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include the title page or reference page. Reflect on your decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken by nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision-making within issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

    1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature. Additionally, this should include a thorough literature review that provides a good understanding of what the cause of this problem is and what is suggested to address this problem. Essentially, this review must support your choices of decision-making models and this needs to include how all levels of nursing practice (the bedside nurse to the APN are impacted by the problem).

    2. Identify how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse, and an Advanced practice nurse (CNO or NP) to address your selected issue using at least 2 [3 ideal]  different decision-making approaches that are supported by the literature review. This must first include a detailed analysis/overview of the selected decision-making models and how they are used in practice. Then a detailed analysis of how these decision-making approaches/models would address the problem/along with a detailed analysis of how each of the three selected models would be applied to address the selected issue/problem making sure to incorporate this at all levels of practice. One of the decision-making models may be more applicable to the bedside nurse; whereas the other is more applicable to the APN; however, all levels of nursing practice need to be addressed with at least one of the chosen 3 decision-making models. However, this does not mean that each decision-making model will apply to all levels of practice only that this discussion needs to include how each level of nursing practice would utilize the decision-making model to address the problem. For instance, one decision-making model may apply to the bedside nurse; the second decision-making model may be more applicable at the level of APN (CNO, NP, etc) and the other decision-making model may be best applied to the nurse manager. This section should be detailed; meaning specific, well thought out, realistic solutions of how the nurse (at the level identified; this may include more than one level for the same decision-making model or not) would address the problem using the decision-making model is provided and well supported by the literature. of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed by course readings, literature, clinical scenarios, and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.

    3. Prioritize the best decision-making approach/model to address the selected problem that is grounded in best practice. This should provide a well-supported rationale for this choice that includes a good comparison and contrast of the 3 chosen decision-making models that clearly illustrate why the choice was made, that is consistent with the decision-making model, and how it would address the chosen topic or problem.

    4. Identify a possible funding source that would address your approach to solving the problem. For instance, if the best approach to solving the nurse-to-patient ratio problem is through the use of SDM and shared governance, perhaps you may seek a local funding source to provide you with funding to implement a small EBP or research project that would be funded by a local nursing organization such as Sigma Theta Tau or perhaps if it was geared more towards assessing the value of this model towards NP in practice than seeking a local organization that supports funding for projects being implemented by practicing NP? If seeking money for research this would need to be overseen by a nurse with a DNP or a PhD or someone with the credentials to do so that are part of their scope of practice. Consider looking at federal, state, or local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this needs to be specifically applied with sufficient details

    5. Use at least
    **10 current scholarly references** [not older than 5 years] other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting.

    **Here is a SAMPLE OUTLINE- DIABETES IN NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC.**

    **Sample Outline: Pediatric Diabetes as a Nursing Issue Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Brief overview of pediatric diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 in children).

    · Statement of significance: why pediatric diabetes is a critical nursing issue across all levels of practice.

    · Preview of key themes: prevalence, causes, systemlevel impact, and decisionmaking approaches.

    **II. Background and Significance of the Problem**

    **A. Overview of Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Definition and differentiation of Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes in children.

    · Pathophysiology and unique considerations in pediatric populations.

    **B. Impact Across Nursing Levels**

    · How bedside nurses, nurse managers, and advanced practice nurses encounter and manage pediatric diabetes.

    · Why this issue requires coordinated action across the nursing continuum.

    **III. Literature Review: Causes, Contributing Factors, and Recommended Interventions**

    **A. Etiology and Contributing Factors**

    · Genetic predisposition, autoimmune mechanisms, environmental triggers.

    · Lifestyle and social determinants influencing pediatric Type 2 diabetes.

    · Psychosocial and developmental considerations.

    **B. Consequences of Poorly Managed Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Acute complications (DKA, hypoglycemia).

    · Longterm risks (cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, neuropathy).

    · Family burden and qualityoflife implications.

    **C. EvidenceBased Interventions**

    · Recommended clinical management strategies.

    · Familycentered education and selfmanagement support.

    · Schoolbased diabetes management programs.

    · Technologyassisted monitoring (CGMs, insulin pumps).

    **IV. DecisionMaking Models (Three Models Required)**

    **A. Overview of Selected DecisionMaking Models**

    ·
    **Shared DecisionMaking (SDM) Model** Description, theoretical foundation, and relevance to pediatric care.

    ·
    **Clinical Judgment Model (Tanner or NCSBN)** Description and application in acute and chronic pediatric management.

    ·
    **Transformational Leadership DecisionMaking Model** Description and relevance for nurse leaders and APNs.

    **V. Application of DecisionMaking Models to the Problem**

    **A. Bedside/Staff Nurse**

    · Use of the
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to assess symptoms, monitor glucose, prevent complications, and educate families.

    · Use of
    **Shared DecisionMaking** to involve parents and children in daily care routines.

    **B. Nurse Leader/Manager**

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to implement unitwide diabetes protocols, staff training, and qualityimprovement initiatives.

    · Use of
    **SDM** to support familycentered care policies.

    **C. Advanced Practice Nurse (NP or CNO)**

    · Use of
    **SDM** to develop individualized care plans and longterm management strategies.

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to advocate for institutional resources, community partnerships, and policy changes.

    · Use of
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to guide diagnostic reasoning and treatment adjustments.

    **VI. Comparison and Prioritization of DecisionMaking Models**

    · Compare strengths and limitations of each model.

    · Identify which model is most effective for addressing pediatric diabetes across settings.

    · Provide rationale grounded in evidence (e.g., SDM may be prioritized due to the need for family engagement and longterm adherence).

    **VII. Funding Source for Proposed Approach**

    · Identify a realistic funding source (e.g., HRSA, CDC, NIH, local children’s health foundations, Sigma Theta Tau).

    · Explain why this source aligns with the proposed intervention or improvement project.

    · Describe how funds would be used (training, technology, education programs, QI initiatives).

    **VIII. Conclusion**

    · Summarize the significance of pediatric diabetes as a nursing issue.

    · Reinforce the importance of coordinated decisionmaking across all nursing levels.

    · Emphasize the potential impact of the prioritized decisionmaking model on patient outcomes, family engagement, and systemlevel improvements.

    **Your TOPIC must be selected from the list below:**

    **🤖 Artificial Intelligence & Clinical Decision Support**

    1.
    **Algorithmic Bias in Triage:** Deciding when to override AI predictive risk scores that under-rank deterioration risk in racially diverse or marginalized patient populations.

    2.
    **Liability & Accountability:** Navigating legal and clinical accountability when an APRN follows an automated clinical decision support tool that results in an adverse outcome.

    3.
    **Ambient AI Documentation Protocols:** Balancing privacy consent, liability, and audit trails when deploying real-time ambient AI listening tools during sensitive patient consultations.

    4.
    **Predictive Analytics in Palliative Care:** Decision-making framework for integrating AI mortality-prediction algorithms into goals-of-care conversations without causing premature withdrawal of treatment.

    5.
    **APRN Oversight of Autonomous AI Diagnostics:** Protocols for APRN validation vs. override of autonomous AI diagnostic systems (e.g., automated AI diabetic retinopathy screening or AI radiology pre-reads).

    **📱 Digital Health & Innovation**

    1.
    **Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Alert Fatigue:** Structuring APRN decision-making protocols to filter high-volume RPM telemetry data and reduce liability/alert fatigue while maintaining safety.

    2.
    **Hospital-at-Home Inclusion Criteria:** Establishing risk-stratification criteria for identifying acute-care patients safe for Hospital-at-Home models versus those needing physical ICU/floor admission.

    3.
    **Digital Health Equity Barriers:** Clinical decision-making frameworks for remote care management when patients lack digital literacy, stable broadband, or compatible cellular hardware.

    4.
    **Virtual Nursing Delegation Models:** Determining task-allocation limits and clinical boundaries when integrating virtual nurses into bedside acute-care teams during code blue or rapid response events.

    5.
    **Wearable Device Data Integration:** Establishing clinical threshold guidelines for acting on unvalidated consumer health wearable data (e.g., smartwatches) brought in by patients.

    **🩺 Advanced Practice Nursing & Clinical Governance**

    1.
    **GLP-1 Medication Prioritization & Scarcity:** Formulating ethical allocation criteria when prescribing GLP-1 receptor agonists amidst severe supply chain shortages or restrictive insurance coverage.

    2.
    **Scope of Practice Transition:** Decision-making frameworks for APRNs transitioning from collaborative agreements to full practice authority in rural or medically underserved regions.

    3.
    **Value-Based Care vs. Fee-for-Service Dilemmas:** Balancing institutional pressure for volume-driven patient turnover against quality metrics in APRN-led specialty clinics.

    4.
    **Off-Label Prescribing Governance:** Establishing institutional criteria and evidence-based decision matrices for off-label APRN prescribing in complex or refractory conditions.

    5.
    **Collaborative Agreement Restructuring:** Formulating APRN leadership strategies to negotiate hospital credentialing and privileging rights during health system mergers.

    **👥 Workforce, Safety & Organizational Leadership**

    1.
    **Second Victim Support Systems:** Developing standardized peer-support and duty-assignment protocols for clinicians immediately following a severe catastrophic medical error.

    2.
    **Diagnostic Overconfidence & Cognitive Bias:** Implementing multidisciplinary peer-review tools designed to interrupt diagnostic momentum and anchor bias in high-acuity settings.

    3.
    **Workforce Allocation During Critical Shortages:** Ethical decision-making frameworks for crisis-standards-of-care staffing allocations when traveler/agency coverage is unavailable.

    4.
    **Disruptive Behavior & Safety Culture:** Navigating administrative action vs. retention strategies when addressing high-performing but clinically disruptive medical or nursing staff.

    5.
    **Cross-Training Deployment Criteria:** Establishing competency verification matrices before reassigning non-ICU nurses to step-down or critical care units during surge capacity events.

    **🌍 Population Health & Emerging Healthcare Systems**

    1.
    **Severe Maternal Morbidity Protocols:** Designing rapid-response decision trees for non-obstetric emergency departments treating post-partum complications.

    2.
    **Polypharmacy Deprescribing Cascades:** Decision matrices for systematically tapering high-risk medications in frail, multi-morbid geriatric patients with conflicting clinical practice guidelines.

    3.
    **Psychiatric ED Boarding & Divert Decisions:** Formulating clinical placement protocols for managing long-stay psychiatric patients occupying acute ED beds under strict resource constraints.

    4.
    **Financial Toxicity Mitigation:** Integrating real-time out-of-pocket cost considerations into clinical treatment planning without compromising evidence-based standard of care.

    5.
    **Antimicrobial Stewardship Conflict Resolution:** Navigating decision-making when APRN antimicrobial stewardship protocols conflict with attending physician preferences in high-risk patients.

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    Press Alt + F10 to access toolbar options

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **Screenshot2025-07-131706141.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-07-131706141-jpg)

    **## ActiveLearningAssignment.docx**

    Active Learning Assignment: TOPIC and OUTLINE Assignment

    **Instructions for Writing Your Topic Outline Submission Paper**

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline. DO NOT EMAIL ME your topic.**

    **1. Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE**

    ·
    **Choose a Meaningful Issue:** Identify a significant issue in your field (for example, a nursing challenge, leadership dilemma, or a specific patient-care decision-making process). Your topic should be both relevant and complex enough to support an in-depth analysis in your final paper.

    ·
    **Topic Approval:** Make sure your selected topic is approved by your instructor before proceeding to begin work on your final submission. This approval ensures that your subject matter is appropriate and focused.

    **2. Develop Your Thesis Statement**

    ·
    **Craft a Clear Thesis:** Write a concise thesis statement that conveys the main argument or primary inquiry your final paper will address. Your thesis should hint at the multidimensional decision-making approaches and leadership strategies you plan to explore.

    **3. Outline the Structure of Your Paper**

    Your outline should provide a clear roadmap of your paper. Use APA-style level headings and subheadings to reflect the organization. Consider including the following sections:

    ·
    **I. Introduction**

    ·
    **A. Background Information:** Introduce the broad topic and its significance to your field.

    ·
    **B. Statement of the Problem:** Describe the key issue or challenge that your paper will address.

    ·
    **C. Thesis Statement:** Present your central argument or purpose.

    ·
    **II. Literature Review/Background**

    ·
    **A. Overview of Existing Research:** Provide a brief summary of scholarly research relevant to your topic.

    ·
    **B. Key Theories and Models:** Identify and describe the major theories or decision-making models that will inform your analysis [minimum 2].

    ·
    **III. Main Body/Discussion**

    ·
    **A. Section One – Topic Analysis or Context:** Outline the first major point or perspective you plan to examine.

    · Subpoints: Include supporting evidence or examples.

    ·
    **B. Section Two – Comparative Analysis:** Detail how different decision-making approaches or leadership styles impact the issue.

    · Subpoints: Compare the bedside nurse’s approaches with those of advanced practice nurses or nurse leaders.

    ·
    **C. Section Three – Application and Implications:** Explain how the chosen models or theories could be applied in practical settings, using specific examples or case studies.

    · Subpoints: Describe potential benefits, limitations, and recommendations.

    ·
    **IV. Conclusion**

    ·
    **A. Summary of Key Points:** Recap the main sections of your outline.

    ·
    **B. Implications and Next Steps:** Highlight how your final paper will synthesize the information and propose possible solutions or recommendations.

    **V. Preliminary References**[5 required for full credit in this assignment]

    · Include a short list of scholarly sources you plan to use. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

    · Include a short list of key scholarly sources that will support your research and analysis in the full paper. Follow APA 7th Edition formatting.

    See visual sample below:

    **4. Formatting and Submission Requirements**

    ·
    **Formatting:**

    · Use APA 7th Edition guidelines for heading levels, in-text citations (if applicable), and your reference list.

    · The outline can be presented in a combination of narrative paragraphs and bullet points. Ensure your formatting is clear and easy to follow.

    · Your topic and outline submission may be a concise document (typically 2-3 pages)- DO NOT EXCEED THIS as this is NOT your PAPER- I will STOP reading at PAGE 3 [reference page and cover page DO NOT COUNT].

    ·
    **Structure:**

    ·
    **Title Page:** Although this is a preliminary outline, follow any institutional guidelines regarding the inclusion of a title page.

    ·
    **Clear Headings:** Use clear, descriptive headings and subheadings that mirror the structure of your eventual paper.

    ·
    **Page Organization:** Though the outline does not need to be lengthy, it should provide a logical sequence of ideas that can be expanded later into a full paper.

    ·
    **Review the Grading Rubric:**

    · Before submission, review the assignment rubric carefully to ensure that your outline meets all the specified elements (e.g., clarity of topic, logical organization, relevance of sections, APA formatting).

    **5. Final Checks and Submission**

    ·
    **Proofread:** Ensure your outline is free of grammatical and formatting errors.

    ·
    **Clarity and Focus:** Verify that each section of your outline clearly supports your thesis and that the topics flow logically from one section to the next.

    ·
    **Submission:** Submit your topic and outline by the assigned due date through the appropriate course submission portal. Remember, this outline is solely to help you structure your thoughts and will be approved before you proceed with your final paper.

    **Here is a great resource on how to write an outline [please review]:** [**How to write an outline**](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-outline/)

    **Here I will be approving your TOPIC and verify that you are on the right tract. THIS IS NOT your PAPER Submission- just topic and outline**

    Please access the assignment tab and/or read below and begin working on the Shared Decision Paper due week 7 – Saturday by 1159 PM EST. No Late assignments will be accepted.

    **The following is the instructions for the assignment- REMEMBER ONLY THE OUTLINE/Topic is due this week.**

    **Decision-Making Process Paper**

    Instructions

    In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper [excluding cover and reference pages] identifying, comparing, and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing. The topic
    **MUST BE APPROVED and selected from the list below before writing the writing begins.**

    You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include the title page or reference page. Reflect on your decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken by nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision-making within issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

    1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature. Additionally, this should include a thorough literature review that provides a good understanding of what the cause of this problem is and what is suggested to address this problem. Essentially, this review must support your choices of decision-making models and this needs to include how all levels of nursing practice (the bedside nurse to the APN are impacted by the problem).

    2. Identify how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse, and an Advanced practice nurse (CNO or NP) to address your selected issue using at least 2 [3 ideal]  different decision-making approaches that are supported by the literature review. This must first include a detailed analysis/overview of the selected decision-making models and how they are used in practice. Then a detailed analysis of how these decision-making approaches/models would address the problem/along with a detailed analysis of how each of the three selected models would be applied to address the selected issue/problem making sure to incorporate this at all levels of practice. One of the decision-making models may be more applicable to the bedside nurse; whereas the other is more applicable to the APN; however, all levels of nursing practice need to be addressed with at least one of the chosen 3 decision-making models. However, this does not mean that each decision-making model will apply to all levels of practice only that this discussion needs to include how each level of nursing practice would utilize the decision-making model to address the problem. For instance, one decision-making model may apply to the bedside nurse; the second decision-making model may be more applicable at the level of APN (CNO, NP, etc) and the other decision-making model may be best applied to the nurse manager. This section should be detailed; meaning specific, well thought out, realistic solutions of how the nurse (at the level identified; this may include more than one level for the same decision-making model or not) would address the problem using the decision-making model is provided and well supported by the literature. of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed by course readings, literature, clinical scenarios, and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.

    3. Prioritize the best decision-making approach/model to address the selected problem that is grounded in best practice. This should provide a well-supported rationale for this choice that includes a good comparison and contrast of the 3 chosen decision-making models that clearly illustrate why the choice was made, that is consistent with the decision-making model, and how it would address the chosen topic or problem.

    4. Identify a possible funding source that would address your approach to solving the problem. For instance, if the best approach to solving the nurse-to-patient ratio problem is through the use of SDM and shared governance, perhaps you may seek a local funding source to provide you with funding to implement a small EBP or research project that would be funded by a local nursing organization such as Sigma Theta Tau or perhaps if it was geared more towards assessing the value of this model towards NP in practice than seeking a local organization that supports funding for projects being implemented by practicing NP? If seeking money for research this would need to be overseen by a nurse with a DNP or a PhD or someone with the credentials to do so that are part of their scope of practice. Consider looking at federal, state, or local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this needs to be specifically applied with sufficient details

    5. Use at least
    **10 current scholarly references** [not older than 5 years] other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting.

    **Here is a SAMPLE OUTLINE- DIABETES IN NOT AN APPROVED TOPIC.**

    **Sample Outline: Pediatric Diabetes as a Nursing Issue Impacting All Levels of Practice**

    **I. Introduction**

    · Brief overview of pediatric diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 in children).

    · Statement of significance: why pediatric diabetes is a critical nursing issue across all levels of practice.

    · Preview of key themes: prevalence, causes, systemlevel impact, and decisionmaking approaches.

    **II. Background and Significance of the Problem**

    **A. Overview of Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Definition and differentiation of Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes in children.

    · Pathophysiology and unique considerations in pediatric populations.

    **B. Impact Across Nursing Levels**

    · How bedside nurses, nurse managers, and advanced practice nurses encounter and manage pediatric diabetes.

    · Why this issue requires coordinated action across the nursing continuum.

    **III. Literature Review: Causes, Contributing Factors, and Recommended Interventions**

    **A. Etiology and Contributing Factors**

    · Genetic predisposition, autoimmune mechanisms, environmental triggers.

    · Lifestyle and social determinants influencing pediatric Type 2 diabetes.

    · Psychosocial and developmental considerations.

    **B. Consequences of Poorly Managed Pediatric Diabetes**

    · Acute complications (DKA, hypoglycemia).

    · Longterm risks (cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, neuropathy).

    · Family burden and qualityoflife implications.

    **C. EvidenceBased Interventions**

    · Recommended clinical management strategies.

    · Familycentered education and selfmanagement support.

    · Schoolbased diabetes management programs.

    · Technologyassisted monitoring (CGMs, insulin pumps).

    **IV. DecisionMaking Models (Three Models Required)**

    **A. Overview of Selected DecisionMaking Models**

    ·
    **Shared DecisionMaking (SDM) Model** Description, theoretical foundation, and relevance to pediatric care.

    ·
    **Clinical Judgment Model (Tanner or NCSBN)** Description and application in acute and chronic pediatric management.

    ·
    **Transformational Leadership DecisionMaking Model** Description and relevance for nurse leaders and APNs.

    **V. Application of DecisionMaking Models to the Problem**

    **A. Bedside/Staff Nurse**

    · Use of the
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to assess symptoms, monitor glucose, prevent complications, and educate families.

    · Use of
    **Shared DecisionMaking** to involve parents and children in daily care routines.

    **B. Nurse Leader/Manager**

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to implement unitwide diabetes protocols, staff training, and qualityimprovement initiatives.

    · Use of
    **SDM** to support familycentered care policies.

    **C. Advanced Practice Nurse (NP or CNO)**

    · Use of
    **SDM** to develop individualized care plans and longterm management strategies.

    · Use of
    **Transformational Leadership** to advocate for institutional resources, community partnerships, and policy changes.

    · Use of
    **Clinical Judgment Model** to guide diagnostic reasoning and treatment adjustments.

    **VI. Comparison and Prioritization of DecisionMaking Models**

    · Compare strengths and limitations of each model.

    · Identify which model is most effective for addressing pediatric diabetes across settings.

    · Provide rationale grounded in evidence (e.g., SDM may be prioritized due to the need for family engagement and longterm adherence).

    **VII. Funding Source for Proposed Approach**

    · Identify a realistic funding source (e.g., HRSA, CDC, NIH, local children’s health foundations, Sigma Theta Tau).

    · Explain why this source aligns with the proposed intervention or improvement project.

    · Describe how funds would be used (training, technology, education programs, QI initiatives).

    **VIII. Conclusion**

    · Summarize the significance of pediatric diabetes as a nursing issue.

    · Reinforce the importance of coordinated decisionmaking across all nursing levels.

    · Emphasize the potential impact of the prioritized decisionmaking model on patient outcomes, family engagement, and systemlevel improvements.

    **Your TOPIC must be selected from the list below:**

    **🤖 Artificial Intelligence & Clinical Decision Support**

    1.
    **Algorithmic Bias in Triage:** Deciding when to override AI predictive risk scores that under-rank deterioration risk in racially diverse or marginalized patient populations.

    2.
    **Liability & Accountability:** Navigating legal and clinical accountability when an APRN follows an automated clinical decision support tool that results in an adverse outcome.

    3.
    **Ambient AI Documentation Protocols:** Balancing privacy consent, liability, and audit trails when deploying real-time ambient AI listening tools during sensitive patient consultations.

    4.
    **Predictive Analytics in Palliative Care:** Decision-making framework for integrating AI mortality-prediction algorithms into goals-of-care conversations without causing premature withdrawal of treatment.

    5.
    **APRN Oversight of Autonomous AI Diagnostics:** Protocols for APRN validation vs. override of autonomous AI diagnostic systems (e.g., automated AI diabetic retinopathy screening or AI radiology pre-reads).

    **📱 Digital Health & Innovation**

    1.
    **Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Alert Fatigue:** Structuring APRN decision-making protocols to filter high-volume RPM telemetry data and reduce liability/alert fatigue while maintaining safety.

    2.
    **Hospital-at-Home Inclusion Criteria:** Establishing risk-stratification criteria for identifying acute-care patients safe for Hospital-at-Home models versus those needing physical ICU/floor admission.

    3.
    **Digital Health Equity Barriers:** Clinical decision-making frameworks for remote care management when patients lack digital literacy, stable broadband, or compatible cellular hardware.

    4.
    **Virtual Nursing Delegation Models:** Determining task-allocation limits and clinical boundaries when integrating virtual nurses into bedside acute-care teams during code blue or rapid response events.

    5.
    **Wearable Device Data Integration:** Establishing clinical threshold guidelines for acting on unvalidated consumer health wearable data (e.g., smartwatches) brought in by patients.

    **🩺 Advanced Practice Nursing & Clinical Governance**

    1.
    **GLP-1 Medication Prioritization & Scarcity:** Formulating ethical allocation criteria when prescribing GLP-1 receptor agonists amidst severe supply chain shortages or restrictive insurance coverage.

    2.
    **Scope of Practice Transition:** Decision-making frameworks for APRNs transitioning from collaborative agreements to full practice authority in rural or medically underserved regions.

    3.
    **Value-Based Care vs. Fee-for-Service Dilemmas:** Balancing institutional pressure for volume-driven patient turnover against quality metrics in APRN-led specialty clinics.

    4.
    **Off-Label Prescribing Governance:** Establishing institutional criteria and evidence-based decision matrices for off-label APRN prescribing in complex or refractory conditions.

    5.
    **Collaborative Agreement Restructuring:** Formulating APRN leadership strategies to negotiate hospital credentialing and privileging rights during health system mergers.

    **👥 Workforce, Safety & Organizational Leadership**

    1.
    **Second Victim Support Systems:** Developing standardized peer-support and duty-assignment protocols for clinicians immediately following a severe catastrophic medical error.

    2.
    **Diagnostic Overconfidence & Cognitive Bias:** Implementing multidisciplinary peer-review tools designed to interrupt diagnostic momentum and anchor bias in high-acuity settings.

    3.
    **Workforce Allocation During Critical Shortages:** Ethical decision-making frameworks for crisis-standards-of-care staffing allocations when traveler/agency coverage is unavailable.

    4.
    **Disruptive Behavior & Safety Culture:** Navigating administrative action vs. retention strategies when addressing high-performing but clinically disruptive medical or nursing staff.

    5.
    **Cross-Training Deployment Criteria:** Establishing competency verification matrices before reassigning non-ICU nurses to step-down or critical care units during surge capacity events.

    **🌍 Population Health & Emerging Healthcare Systems**

    1.
    **Severe Maternal Morbidity Protocols:** Designing rapid-response decision trees for non-obstetric emergency departments treating post-partum complications.

    2.
    **Polypharmacy Deprescribing Cascades:** Decision matrices for systematically tapering high-risk medications in frail, multi-morbid geriatric patients with conflicting clinical practice guidelines.

    3.
    **Psychiatric ED Boarding & Divert Decisions:** Formulating clinical placement protocols for managing long-stay psychiatric patients occupying acute ED beds under strict resource constraints.

    4.
    **Financial Toxicity Mitigation:** Integrating real-time out-of-pocket cost considerations into clinical treatment planning without compromising evidence-based standard of care.

    5.
    **Antimicrobial Stewardship Conflict Resolution:** Navigating decision-making when APRN antimicrobial stewardship protocols conflict with attending physician preferences in high-risk patients.

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    Press Alt + F10 to access toolbar options

    _Word count: 0_

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **Screenshot2025-07-131706141.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-07-131706141-jpg)

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (1)** – ## CASESTUDY1.docx **## CASESTUDY1.docx** CASE STUDY 1 – Cardiometabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care **Cardio-metabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care** **Case Scenario:** Mr. J.R. is a 52-year-old Hispanic male presenting for a routine follow-up. He reports fatigue,…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## CASESTUDY1.docx

    **## CASESTUDY1.docx**

    CASE STUDY 1 – Cardiometabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care

    **Cardio-metabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care**

    **Case Scenario:**

    Mr. J.R. is a 52-year-old Hispanic male presenting for a routine follow-up. He reports fatigue, increased thirst, and weight gain over the past year.

    History:

    · PMH: Type 2 diabetes (6 years), hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity

    · Medications: Metformin 1000 mg BID, Lisinopril 10 mg daily, Atorvastatin 20 mg nightly

    · Social: Sedentary lifestyle, works two jobs, limited access to healthy food

    · Family history: Father with MI at 59

    Vitals:

    · BP: 148/92 mmHg

    · BMI: 36 kg/m²

    Labs:

    · A1C: 9.1%

    · LDL: 142 mg/dL

    · Triglycerides: 265 mg/dL

    · eGFR: 68 mL/min/1.73m²

    · Urine albumin/creatinine ratio: 45 mg/g

    **Student Assignment Requirements (APA 7)**

    Students must submit a 7–9 page scholarly paper (excluding title and references) addressing:

    **1. Pathophysiology (25%)**

    · Explain the interrelationship between insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and endothelial dysfunction

    · Describe progression to microvascular and macrovascular complications

    · Integrate evidence-based literature

    **2. Comprehensive Assessment (30%)**

    · Focused and comprehensive primary care assessment

    · Cardiovascular risk stratification (ASCVD)

    · Identification of red flags and complications

    · Preventive care and screening needs

    **3. Pharmacology & Management (35%)**

    · Evidence-based medication optimization per ADA, ACC/AHA, and KDIGO guidelines

    · Justification for adding/changing medications (e.g., GLP-1 RA, SGLT2 inhibitor)

    · Non-pharmacologic management

    · Monitoring and follow-up plan

    **4. Scholarly Writing & APA Format (10%)**

    · Use of current (≤5 years) peer-reviewed sources

    · APA 7 accuracy and clarity

    | |
    | — |
    | **RUBRIC – CASE STUDY 1 – Cardiometabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care (100 Points)**<br>**1. Pathophysiology (25 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (23–25)**<br>Demonstrates an advanced, accurate explanation of cardiometabolic pathophysiology, clearly integrating insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and vascular inflammation. Shows strong synthesis of current evidence and applies mechanisms directly to the patient case.<br>**Satisfactory (18–22)**<br>Explains core pathophysiologic concepts correctly with minor gaps in depth or integration. Connections to the patient scenario are present but may lack full synthesis.<br>**Unsatisfactory (13–17)**<br>Provides a basic or partially inaccurate discussion of pathophysiology. Limited linkage between mechanisms and clinical manifestations.<br>**Poor (1–12)**<br>Pathophysiology is superficial, inaccurate, or largely descriptive with minimal understanding of disease mechanisms.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing.<br>**2. Comprehensive Assessment & Clinical Reasoning (30 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (28–30)**<br>Presents a comprehensive, prioritized assessment including risk stratification, complication screening, and preventive care. Demonstrates excellent clinical judgment and aligns findings with guidelines.<br>**Satisfactory (22–27)**<br>Assessment is appropriate and accurate but lacks depth, prioritization, or full integration of preventive and risk-based care.<br>**Unsatisfactory (16–21)**<br>Incomplete assessment with missing key elements or limited clinical reasoning.<br>**Poor (1–15)**<br>Assessment is disorganized, incomplete, or clinically unsafe.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing.<br>**3. Pharmacology & Evidence-Based Management (35 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (33–35)**<br>Develops a comprehensive, guideline-based pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic plan. Medication choices are fully justified, safe, and patient-centered with appropriate monitoring and follow-up.<br>**Satisfactory (26–32)**<br>Management plan is generally appropriate but may lack full justification, optimization, or monitoring details.<br>**Unsatisfactory (18–25)**<br>Pharmacologic plan demonstrates limited understanding of guidelines or contains omissions or questionable choices.<br>**Poor (1–17)**<br>Plan is unsafe, unsupported by evidence, or demonstrates poor pharmacologic reasoning.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing.<br>**4. Scholarly Writing & APA Format (10 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (9–10)**<br>Writing is clear, professional, and well-organized. Correct APA 7 formatting with current, high-quality scholarly sources.<br>**Satisfactory (7–8)**<br>Minor APA or writing errors that do not impede comprehension.<br>**Unsatisfactory (5–6)**<br>Multiple APA or writing errors that detract from clarity.<br>**Poor (1–4)**<br>Significant APA violations and poor academic writing.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing. |

    **Submission**

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

    **## CASESTUDY1.docx**

    CASE STUDY 1 – Cardiometabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care

    **Cardio-metabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care**

    **Case Scenario:**

    Mr. J.R. is a 52-year-old Hispanic male presenting for a routine follow-up. He reports fatigue, increased thirst, and weight gain over the past year.

    History:

    · PMH: Type 2 diabetes (6 years), hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity

    · Medications: Metformin 1000 mg BID, Lisinopril 10 mg daily, Atorvastatin 20 mg nightly

    · Social: Sedentary lifestyle, works two jobs, limited access to healthy food

    · Family history: Father with MI at 59

    Vitals:

    · BP: 148/92 mmHg

    · BMI: 36 kg/m²

    Labs:

    · A1C: 9.1%

    · LDL: 142 mg/dL

    · Triglycerides: 265 mg/dL

    · eGFR: 68 mL/min/1.73m²

    · Urine albumin/creatinine ratio: 45 mg/g

    **Student Assignment Requirements (APA 7)**

    Students must submit a 7–9 page scholarly paper (excluding title and references) addressing:

    **1. Pathophysiology (25%)**

    · Explain the interrelationship between insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and endothelial dysfunction

    · Describe progression to microvascular and macrovascular complications

    · Integrate evidence-based literature

    **2. Comprehensive Assessment (30%)**

    · Focused and comprehensive primary care assessment

    · Cardiovascular risk stratification (ASCVD)

    · Identification of red flags and complications

    · Preventive care and screening needs

    **3. Pharmacology & Management (35%)**

    · Evidence-based medication optimization per ADA, ACC/AHA, and KDIGO guidelines

    · Justification for adding/changing medications (e.g., GLP-1 RA, SGLT2 inhibitor)

    · Non-pharmacologic management

    · Monitoring and follow-up plan

    **4. Scholarly Writing & APA Format (10%)**

    · Use of current (≤5 years) peer-reviewed sources

    · APA 7 accuracy and clarity

    | |
    | — |
    | **RUBRIC – CASE STUDY 1 – Cardiometabolic Syndrome in Adult Primary Care (100 Points)**<br>**1. Pathophysiology (25 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (23–25)**<br>Demonstrates an advanced, accurate explanation of cardiometabolic pathophysiology, clearly integrating insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and vascular inflammation. Shows strong synthesis of current evidence and applies mechanisms directly to the patient case.<br>**Satisfactory (18–22)**<br>Explains core pathophysiologic concepts correctly with minor gaps in depth or integration. Connections to the patient scenario are present but may lack full synthesis.<br>**Unsatisfactory (13–17)**<br>Provides a basic or partially inaccurate discussion of pathophysiology. Limited linkage between mechanisms and clinical manifestations.<br>**Poor (1–12)**<br>Pathophysiology is superficial, inaccurate, or largely descriptive with minimal understanding of disease mechanisms.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing.<br>**2. Comprehensive Assessment & Clinical Reasoning (30 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (28–30)**<br>Presents a comprehensive, prioritized assessment including risk stratification, complication screening, and preventive care. Demonstrates excellent clinical judgment and aligns findings with guidelines.<br>**Satisfactory (22–27)**<br>Assessment is appropriate and accurate but lacks depth, prioritization, or full integration of preventive and risk-based care.<br>**Unsatisfactory (16–21)**<br>Incomplete assessment with missing key elements or limited clinical reasoning.<br>**Poor (1–15)**<br>Assessment is disorganized, incomplete, or clinically unsafe.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing.<br>**3. Pharmacology & Evidence-Based Management (35 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (33–35)**<br>Develops a comprehensive, guideline-based pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic plan. Medication choices are fully justified, safe, and patient-centered with appropriate monitoring and follow-up.<br>**Satisfactory (26–32)**<br>Management plan is generally appropriate but may lack full justification, optimization, or monitoring details.<br>**Unsatisfactory (18–25)**<br>Pharmacologic plan demonstrates limited understanding of guidelines or contains omissions or questionable choices.<br>**Poor (1–17)**<br>Plan is unsafe, unsupported by evidence, or demonstrates poor pharmacologic reasoning.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing.<br>**4. Scholarly Writing & APA Format (10 points)**<br>Level<br>Description<br>**Excellent (9–10)**<br>Writing is clear, professional, and well-organized. Correct APA 7 formatting with current, high-quality scholarly sources.<br>**Satisfactory (7–8)**<br>Minor APA or writing errors that do not impede comprehension.<br>**Unsatisfactory (5–6)**<br>Multiple APA or writing errors that detract from clarity.<br>**Poor (1–4)**<br>Significant APA violations and poor academic writing.<br>**Not Submitted (0)**<br>Section not submitted or missing. |

    **Submission**

    **Drag files here**

    Maximum size: 512 MB

    **or**

    **Details & Information**

  • [Solved] you will analyze professional nursing organization policies and local organizational policies.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    you will analyze professional nursing organization policies and local organizational policies. – a month ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    you will analyze professional nursing organization policies and local organizational policies.

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] Healthcare 323

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I have a question about healthcare. – a month ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I have a question about healthcare.

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] Nursing Nursing Assignment Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Nursing Assignment Help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (2)** – ## CapstonePartI.docx – ## CapstoneProjectSummary.docx **## CapstonePartI.docx** Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm** **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain top…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## CapstonePartI.docx

    – ## CapstoneProjectSummary.docx

    **## CapstonePartI.docx**

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criterion** | **Points** | **Requirements for Full Credit** |
    | **PICOT and Proposed Health Problem** | **20** | Thoroughly describe the proposed health problem and clearly explain <br>**what change is being proposed**. Support the significance of the problem with <br>**current data, statistics, and scholarly literature**. Clearly connect the problem to the PICOT question. |
    | **Description of the Population** | **20** | Provide a detailed description of the target population, including relevant <br>**age range, demographic characteristics, setting, health condition, and socioeconomic or clinical factors**. Identify important <br>**risk factors** affecting the population and support them with current scholarly evidence. |
    | **Depth of Discussion and Literature Review** | **20** | Provide an <br>**in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the entire paper**. Include a literature review from scholarly journals describing <br>**evidence-based interventions** that address the identified health problem. Integrate and synthesize information from different sources rather than discussing each source separately. The paper should flow logically from one idea to another and demonstrate a clear relationship among the problem, population, evidence, and proposed intervention. According to the rubric, the discussion should flow smoothly <br>**without unnecessary headings**. |
    | **Theoretical Nursing Framework** | **20** | Select an appropriate <br>**nursing theory, health-promotion model, disease-prevention model, or conceptual framework** that aligns with the proposed health problem. Explain the major concepts of the theory and clearly demonstrate how the framework supports the <br>**population, intervention, implementation, and expected outcomes** of the project. |
    | **Spelling, Grammar, and Required Length** | **10** | The paper should contain <br>**fewer than five grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors**. Academic and professional language should be used throughout. The paper must meet the <br>**entire required word or page count** established by the instructor. |
    | **Sources and Evidence** | **10** | Use <br>**more than five current sources**, with at least <br>**three peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books**. Include both general background evidence and specialized evidence related to the intervention. Any websites used should come from authoritative organizations such as the <br>**CDC, NIH, WHO, or professional healthcare organizations**. Citations and references should follow <br>**APA 7th edition**. |
    | **TOTAL** | **100/100** | **All Outstanding criteria must be fully addressed.** |

    **## CapstoneProjectSummary.docx**

    **Capstone Project Summary**

    **Background and Identification of the Problem**

    Colorectal cancer is an important public health concern and remains a significant cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Screening is an essential preventive strategy because it can identify precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer at earlier stages, when treatment may be more effective. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021) recommends colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 45 for average-risk adults and continuing through age 75.

    Despite established screening recommendations, disparities remain among Hispanic adults. Nationally, 61.4% of adults aged 45–75 were up to date with colorectal cancer screening in 2022; however, only 52.4% of Hispanic adults were current with screening, compared with 63.5% of non-Hispanic White adults. In addition, 41.7% of Hispanic adults had never undergone colorectal cancer screening. Screening disparities are especially evident among younger adults aged 45–49, among whom only 29.8% were up to date with screening and 65.7% had never been screened (King et al., 2025).

    Local data also demonstrate the relevance of this problem. Miami-Dade County reported approximately 1,320 new colorectal cancer cases in 2023, corresponding to an age-adjusted incidence rate of 36.5 cases per 100,000 population. In 2024, approximately 456 colorectal cancer deaths occurred in Miami-Dade County, representing an age-adjusted mortality rate of 12.2 deaths per 100,000 population (Florida Department of Health, 2026). Furthermore, Ashad-Bishop et al. (2023) found that colorectal cancer screening rates across Miami-Dade County averaged approximately 59%, but rates decreased to approximately 53.3% in communities with greater social vulnerability. These findings demonstrate that countywide statistics may conceal important disparities within individual neighborhoods and underserved communities.

    **Population and Setting**

    The initial population for this project consisted of Hispanic adults aged 45–75 living throughout Miami-Dade County. However, this population was determined to be too broad for a 12-week capstone project. Therefore, the population was narrowed to Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a specific community clinic in Hialeah, Florida.

    Hialeah is an appropriate setting because the community includes a large Hispanic and Spanish-speaking population. Hispanic adults may encounter several barriers to colorectal cancer screening, including limited awareness, language discordance, lack of health insurance, financial concerns, limited healthcare access, fear, cultural beliefs, and misunderstanding of available screening methods. Montalvan-Sanchez et al. (2024) identified limited awareness, access problems, and language differences as important factors that can delay colorectal cancer screening among Latino and immigrant populations.

    These barriers are significant because inadequate knowledge and delayed screening may contribute to later diagnosis, more aggressive treatment, greater healthcare costs, decreased quality of life, hospitalization, and premature mortality. A bilingual and culturally responsive educational resource may therefore help address misconceptions and communication barriers within this population.

    **PICOT Question**

    In Hispanic adults aged 45 to 75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida (P), how would the development of a bilingual teaching plan about colorectal cancer screening (I), compared with standard educational information (C), support improved colorectal cancer screening education (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    Because the educational intervention will not be implemented directly with patients, the project will not measure actual changes in patient knowledge or screening behavior. Instead, the primary outcome will be the development and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual educational product.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The proposed intervention is the development of a simple, culturally appropriate bilingual teaching plan in English and Spanish addressing colorectal cancer screening. The educational materials will explain the importance of screening, the recommended starting age, available screening options, the role of early detection, and common misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer and screening procedures.

    The educational plan will incorporate understandable language, culturally appropriate content, and visual aids when appropriate. The project will be completed over 12 weeks and will include a review of current evidence, development of the bilingual educational materials, evaluation by the preceptor or qualified healthcare professionals, revision based on feedback, and final presentation of the completed educational product.

    No patients will be recruited, no surveys will be administered, and no identifiable health information will be accessed. Consequently, the project will focus exclusively on creating and evaluating an evidence-based educational resource rather than conducting direct human-subject research.

    **Evidence-Based Practice and APRN Role**

    Evidence-based practice is fundamental to this capstone because it integrates the best available scientific evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, cultural considerations, and healthcare-setting characteristics. APRNs have an important role in identifying clinical practice problems, critically evaluating research, translating evidence into practice, and developing interventions that respond to population-specific healthcare needs. Strengthening evidence-based practice knowledge among advanced practice nurses can support healthcare environments in which clinical decisions are consistently informed by current evidence (Hooge et al., 2022).

    In this capstone project, the APRN will function as an evidence translator, educator, collaborator, and change agent. The APRN role includes reviewing current literature related to colorectal cancer screening, identifying gaps in preventive health education, developing culturally and linguistically appropriate materials, ensuring consistency with current screening recommendations, collaborating with the preceptor, and evaluating the quality of the final educational product.

    The literature supports bilingual education, culturally appropriate communication, community outreach, and patient navigation as strategies that may help reduce barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Hispanic populations (Montalvan-Sanchez et al., 2024). Therefore, the proposed educational plan represents a practical application of evidence-based practice to an identified health disparity.

    **Nursing Theoretical Framework**

    Pender’s Health Promotion Model will serve as the nursing theoretical framework for the project. The model emphasizes how individual characteristics, previous experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, interpersonal influences, cultural factors, and self-efficacy influence health-promoting behaviors (McEwen & Wills, 2023).

    Pender’s model is appropriate for this project because Hispanic adults may experience barriers such as language differences, fear, limited knowledge, financial concerns, and uncertainty regarding available screening procedures. The educational materials will be designed to increase awareness of the benefits of colorectal cancer screening while addressing common misconceptions and perceived barriers. Information will be provided in both English and Spanish using clear language and culturally appropriate communication.

    **Change Theory**

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and refinement of the educational plan through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, current evidence will be reviewed to identify colorectal cancer screening disparities, educational gaps, and barriers affecting Hispanic adults. During the changing stage, the bilingual educational plan will be developed and revised based on scientific evidence and preceptor feedback. During the refreezing stage, the materials will be finalized and recommendations will be developed for possible future incorporation into patient-education practices at the clinic.

    Lewin’s Change Theory complements Pender’s Health Promotion Model because Pender provides a framework for understanding health beliefs and barriers, while Lewin provides a systematic process for developing and integrating an evidence-based educational change.

    **Project Outcome and Significance**

    The primary outcome of this capstone project will be the completion and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual colorectal cancer screening educational plan designed for Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida. The project will not claim measurable improvement in patient knowledge or screening behavior because the intervention will not be implemented directly with patients.

    The significance of the project is its potential to provide the clinic with a culturally and linguistically appropriate educational resource that addresses an identified preventive healthcare disparity. By integrating evidence-based practice, health-promotion theory, change theory, and the APRN role, the project demonstrates how advanced practice nurses can translate research into practical resources that may support colorectal cancer screening education and reduce communication barriers among Hispanic adults.

    **References**

    Ashad-Bishop, K. C., Nwabudike, S. M., Shah, C., & Kobetz, E. (2023). Hyperlocal disparities in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: An ecological study of social vulnerability in Miami-Dade County.
    _Preventive Medicine Reports, 34_, 102262.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Colorectal cancer incidence_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Deaths from colorectal cancer_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer)

    Hooge, N., Allen, D. H., McKenzie, R., & Pandian, V. (2022). Engaging advanced practice nurses in evidence-based practice: An e-mentoring program.
    _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 19_(3), 235–244.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565](https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565)

    King, S. C., King, J., Thomas, C. C., & Richardson, L. C. (2025). Baseline estimates of colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45 to 75 years, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2022.
    _Preventing Chronic Disease, 22_, 250175.
    [https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175](https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175)

    McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2023).
    _Theoretical basis for nursing_ (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
    [https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ](https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ)

    Montalvan-Sanchez, E. E., Beas, R., Karkash, A., Godoy, A., Norwood, D. A., & Dougherty, M. (2024). Delays in colorectal cancer screening for Latino patients: The role of immigrant healthcare in stemming the rising global incidence of colorectal cancer.
    _Gastroenterology Research, 17_(1), 41–51.
    [https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697](https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697)

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2021). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    _JAMA, 325_(19), 1965–1977.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238)

    **## CapstoneProjectSummary.docx**

    **Capstone Project Summary**

    **Background and Identification of the Problem**

    Colorectal cancer is an important public health concern and remains a significant cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Screening is an essential preventive strategy because it can identify precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer at earlier stages, when treatment may be more effective. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021) recommends colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 45 for average-risk adults and continuing through age 75.

    Despite established screening recommendations, disparities remain among Hispanic adults. Nationally, 61.4% of adults aged 45–75 were up to date with colorectal cancer screening in 2022; however, only 52.4% of Hispanic adults were current with screening, compared with 63.5% of non-Hispanic White adults. In addition, 41.7% of Hispanic adults had never undergone colorectal cancer screening. Screening disparities are especially evident among younger adults aged 45–49, among whom only 29.8% were up to date with screening and 65.7% had never been screened (King et al., 2025).

    Local data also demonstrate the relevance of this problem. Miami-Dade County reported approximately 1,320 new colorectal cancer cases in 2023, corresponding to an age-adjusted incidence rate of 36.5 cases per 100,000 population. In 2024, approximately 456 colorectal cancer deaths occurred in Miami-Dade County, representing an age-adjusted mortality rate of 12.2 deaths per 100,000 population (Florida Department of Health, 2026). Furthermore, Ashad-Bishop et al. (2023) found that colorectal cancer screening rates across Miami-Dade County averaged approximately 59%, but rates decreased to approximately 53.3% in communities with greater social vulnerability. These findings demonstrate that countywide statistics may conceal important disparities within individual neighborhoods and underserved communities.

    **Population and Setting**

    The initial population for this project consisted of Hispanic adults aged 45–75 living throughout Miami-Dade County. However, this population was determined to be too broad for a 12-week capstone project. Therefore, the population was narrowed to Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a specific community clinic in Hialeah, Florida.

    Hialeah is an appropriate setting because the community includes a large Hispanic and Spanish-speaking population. Hispanic adults may encounter several barriers to colorectal cancer screening, including limited awareness, language discordance, lack of health insurance, financial concerns, limited healthcare access, fear, cultural beliefs, and misunderstanding of available screening methods. Montalvan-Sanchez et al. (2024) identified limited awareness, access problems, and language differences as important factors that can delay colorectal cancer screening among Latino and immigrant populations.

    These barriers are significant because inadequate knowledge and delayed screening may contribute to later diagnosis, more aggressive treatment, greater healthcare costs, decreased quality of life, hospitalization, and premature mortality. A bilingual and culturally responsive educational resource may therefore help address misconceptions and communication barriers within this population.

    **PICOT Question**

    In Hispanic adults aged 45 to 75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida (P), how would the development of a bilingual teaching plan about colorectal cancer screening (I), compared with standard educational information (C), support improved colorectal cancer screening education (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    Because the educational intervention will not be implemented directly with patients, the project will not measure actual changes in patient knowledge or screening behavior. Instead, the primary outcome will be the development and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual educational product.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The proposed intervention is the development of a simple, culturally appropriate bilingual teaching plan in English and Spanish addressing colorectal cancer screening. The educational materials will explain the importance of screening, the recommended starting age, available screening options, the role of early detection, and common misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer and screening procedures.

    The educational plan will incorporate understandable language, culturally appropriate content, and visual aids when appropriate. The project will be completed over 12 weeks and will include a review of current evidence, development of the bilingual educational materials, evaluation by the preceptor or qualified healthcare professionals, revision based on feedback, and final presentation of the completed educational product.

    No patients will be recruited, no surveys will be administered, and no identifiable health information will be accessed. Consequently, the project will focus exclusively on creating and evaluating an evidence-based educational resource rather than conducting direct human-subject research.

    **Evidence-Based Practice and APRN Role**

    Evidence-based practice is fundamental to this capstone because it integrates the best available scientific evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, cultural considerations, and healthcare-setting characteristics. APRNs have an important role in identifying clinical practice problems, critically evaluating research, translating evidence into practice, and developing interventions that respond to population-specific healthcare needs. Strengthening evidence-based practice knowledge among advanced practice nurses can support healthcare environments in which clinical decisions are consistently informed by current evidence (Hooge et al., 2022).

    In this capstone project, the APRN will function as an evidence translator, educator, collaborator, and change agent. The APRN role includes reviewing current literature related to colorectal cancer screening, identifying gaps in preventive health education, developing culturally and linguistically appropriate materials, ensuring consistency with current screening recommendations, collaborating with the preceptor, and evaluating the quality of the final educational product.

    The literature supports bilingual education, culturally appropriate communication, community outreach, and patient navigation as strategies that may help reduce barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Hispanic populations (Montalvan-Sanchez et al., 2024). Therefore, the proposed educational plan represents a practical application of evidence-based practice to an identified health disparity.

    **Nursing Theoretical Framework**

    Pender’s Health Promotion Model will serve as the nursing theoretical framework for the project. The model emphasizes how individual characteristics, previous experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, interpersonal influences, cultural factors, and self-efficacy influence health-promoting behaviors (McEwen & Wills, 2023).

    Pender’s model is appropriate for this project because Hispanic adults may experience barriers such as language differences, fear, limited knowledge, financial concerns, and uncertainty regarding available screening procedures. The educational materials will be designed to increase awareness of the benefits of colorectal cancer screening while addressing common misconceptions and perceived barriers. Information will be provided in both English and Spanish using clear language and culturally appropriate communication.

    **Change Theory**

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and refinement of the educational plan through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, current evidence will be reviewed to identify colorectal cancer screening disparities, educational gaps, and barriers affecting Hispanic adults. During the changing stage, the bilingual educational plan will be developed and revised based on scientific evidence and preceptor feedback. During the refreezing stage, the materials will be finalized and recommendations will be developed for possible future incorporation into patient-education practices at the clinic.

    Lewin’s Change Theory complements Pender’s Health Promotion Model because Pender provides a framework for understanding health beliefs and barriers, while Lewin provides a systematic process for developing and integrating an evidence-based educational change.

    **Project Outcome and Significance**

    The primary outcome of this capstone project will be the completion and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual colorectal cancer screening educational plan designed for Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida. The project will not claim measurable improvement in patient knowledge or screening behavior because the intervention will not be implemented directly with patients.

    The significance of the project is its potential to provide the clinic with a culturally and linguistically appropriate educational resource that addresses an identified preventive healthcare disparity. By integrating evidence-based practice, health-promotion theory, change theory, and the APRN role, the project demonstrates how advanced practice nurses can translate research into practical resources that may support colorectal cancer screening education and reduce communication barriers among Hispanic adults.

    **References**

    Ashad-Bishop, K. C., Nwabudike, S. M., Shah, C., & Kobetz, E. (2023). Hyperlocal disparities in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: An ecological study of social vulnerability in Miami-Dade County.
    _Preventive Medicine Reports, 34_, 102262.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Colorectal cancer incidence_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Deaths from colorectal cancer_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer)

    Hooge, N., Allen, D. H., McKenzie, R., & Pandian, V. (2022). Engaging advanced practice nurses in evidence-based practice: An e-mentoring program.
    _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 19_(3), 235–244.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565](https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565)

    King, S. C., King, J., Thomas, C. C., & Richardson, L. C. (2025). Baseline estimates of colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45 to 75 years, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2022.
    _Preventing Chronic Disease, 22_, 250175.
    [https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175](https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175)

    McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2023).
    _Theoretical basis for nursing_ (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
    [https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ](https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ)

    Montalvan-Sanchez, E. E., Beas, R., Karkash, A., Godoy, A., Norwood, D. A., & Dougherty, M. (2024). Delays in colorectal cancer screening for Latino patients: The role of immigrant healthcare in stemming the rising global incidence of colorectal cancer.
    _Gastroenterology Research, 17_(1), 41–51.
    [https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697](https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697)

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2021). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    _JAMA, 325_(19), 1965–1977.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238)

    **## CapstonePartI.docx**

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criterion** | **Points** | **Requirements for Full Credit** |
    | **PICOT and Proposed Health Problem** | **20** | Thoroughly describe the proposed health problem and clearly explain <br>**what change is being proposed**. Support the significance of the problem with <br>**current data, statistics, and scholarly literature**. Clearly connect the problem to the PICOT question. |
    | **Description of the Population** | **20** | Provide a detailed description of the target population, including relevant <br>**age range, demographic characteristics, setting, health condition, and socioeconomic or clinical factors**. Identify important <br>**risk factors** affecting the population and support them with current scholarly evidence. |
    | **Depth of Discussion and Literature Review** | **20** | Provide an <br>**in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the entire paper**. Include a literature review from scholarly journals describing <br>**evidence-based interventions** that address the identified health problem. Integrate and synthesize information from different sources rather than discussing each source separately. The paper should flow logically from one idea to another and demonstrate a clear relationship among the problem, population, evidence, and proposed intervention. According to the rubric, the discussion should flow smoothly <br>**without unnecessary headings**. |
    | **Theoretical Nursing Framework** | **20** | Select an appropriate <br>**nursing theory, health-promotion model, disease-prevention model, or conceptual framework** that aligns with the proposed health problem. Explain the major concepts of the theory and clearly demonstrate how the framework supports the <br>**population, intervention, implementation, and expected outcomes** of the project. |
    | **Spelling, Grammar, and Required Length** | **10** | The paper should contain <br>**fewer than five grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors**. Academic and professional language should be used throughout. The paper must meet the <br>**entire required word or page count** established by the instructor. |
    | **Sources and Evidence** | **10** | Use <br>**more than five current sources**, with at least <br>**three peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books**. Include both general background evidence and specialized evidence related to the intervention. Any websites used should come from authoritative organizations such as the <br>**CDC, NIH, WHO, or professional healthcare organizations**. Citations and references should follow <br>**APA 7th edition**. |
    | **TOTAL** | **100/100** | **All Outstanding criteria must be fully addressed.** |

    **## CapstoneProjectSummary.docx**

    **Capstone Project Summary**

    **Background and Identification of the Problem**

    Colorectal cancer is an important public health concern and remains a significant cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Screening is an essential preventive strategy because it can identify precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer at earlier stages, when treatment may be more effective. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021) recommends colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 45 for average-risk adults and continuing through age 75.

    Despite established screening recommendations, disparities remain among Hispanic adults. Nationally, 61.4% of adults aged 45–75 were up to date with colorectal cancer screening in 2022; however, only 52.4% of Hispanic adults were current with screening, compared with 63.5% of non-Hispanic White adults. In addition, 41.7% of Hispanic adults had never undergone colorectal cancer screening. Screening disparities are especially evident among younger adults aged 45–49, among whom only 29.8% were up to date with screening and 65.7% had never been screened (King et al., 2025).

    Local data also demonstrate the relevance of this problem. Miami-Dade County reported approximately 1,320 new colorectal cancer cases in 2023, corresponding to an age-adjusted incidence rate of 36.5 cases per 100,000 population. In 2024, approximately 456 colorectal cancer deaths occurred in Miami-Dade County, representing an age-adjusted mortality rate of 12.2 deaths per 100,000 population (Florida Department of Health, 2026). Furthermore, Ashad-Bishop et al. (2023) found that colorectal cancer screening rates across Miami-Dade County averaged approximately 59%, but rates decreased to approximately 53.3% in communities with greater social vulnerability. These findings demonstrate that countywide statistics may conceal important disparities within individual neighborhoods and underserved communities.

    **Population and Setting**

    The initial population for this project consisted of Hispanic adults aged 45–75 living throughout Miami-Dade County. However, this population was determined to be too broad for a 12-week capstone project. Therefore, the population was narrowed to Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a specific community clinic in Hialeah, Florida.

    Hialeah is an appropriate setting because the community includes a large Hispanic and Spanish-speaking population. Hispanic adults may encounter several barriers to colorectal cancer screening, including limited awareness, language discordance, lack of health insurance, financial concerns, limited healthcare access, fear, cultural beliefs, and misunderstanding of available screening methods. Montalvan-Sanchez et al. (2024) identified limited awareness, access problems, and language differences as important factors that can delay colorectal cancer screening among Latino and immigrant populations.

    These barriers are significant because inadequate knowledge and delayed screening may contribute to later diagnosis, more aggressive treatment, greater healthcare costs, decreased quality of life, hospitalization, and premature mortality. A bilingual and culturally responsive educational resource may therefore help address misconceptions and communication barriers within this population.

    **PICOT Question**

    In Hispanic adults aged 45 to 75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida (P), how would the development of a bilingual teaching plan about colorectal cancer screening (I), compared with standard educational information (C), support improved colorectal cancer screening education (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    Because the educational intervention will not be implemented directly with patients, the project will not measure actual changes in patient knowledge or screening behavior. Instead, the primary outcome will be the development and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual educational product.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The proposed intervention is the development of a simple, culturally appropriate bilingual teaching plan in English and Spanish addressing colorectal cancer screening. The educational materials will explain the importance of screening, the recommended starting age, available screening options, the role of early detection, and common misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer and screening procedures.

    The educational plan will incorporate understandable language, culturally appropriate content, and visual aids when appropriate. The project will be completed over 12 weeks and will include a review of current evidence, development of the bilingual educational materials, evaluation by the preceptor or qualified healthcare professionals, revision based on feedback, and final presentation of the completed educational product.

    No patients will be recruited, no surveys will be administered, and no identifiable health information will be accessed. Consequently, the project will focus exclusively on creating and evaluating an evidence-based educational resource rather than conducting direct human-subject research.

    **Evidence-Based Practice and APRN Role**

    Evidence-based practice is fundamental to this capstone because it integrates the best available scientific evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, cultural considerations, and healthcare-setting characteristics. APRNs have an important role in identifying clinical practice problems, critically evaluating research, translating evidence into practice, and developing interventions that respond to population-specific healthcare needs. Strengthening evidence-based practice knowledge among advanced practice nurses can support healthcare environments in which clinical decisions are consistently informed by current evidence (Hooge et al., 2022).

    In this capstone project, the APRN will function as an evidence translator, educator, collaborator, and change agent. The APRN role includes reviewing current literature related to colorectal cancer screening, identifying gaps in preventive health education, developing culturally and linguistically appropriate materials, ensuring consistency with current screening recommendations, collaborating with the preceptor, and evaluating the quality of the final educational product.

    The literature supports bilingual education, culturally appropriate communication, community outreach, and patient navigation as strategies that may help reduce barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Hispanic populations (Montalvan-Sanchez et al., 2024). Therefore, the proposed educational plan represents a practical application of evidence-based practice to an identified health disparity.

    **Nursing Theoretical Framework**

    Pender’s Health Promotion Model will serve as the nursing theoretical framework for the project. The model emphasizes how individual characteristics, previous experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, interpersonal influences, cultural factors, and self-efficacy influence health-promoting behaviors (McEwen & Wills, 2023).

    Pender’s model is appropriate for this project because Hispanic adults may experience barriers such as language differences, fear, limited knowledge, financial concerns, and uncertainty regarding available screening procedures. The educational materials will be designed to increase awareness of the benefits of colorectal cancer screening while addressing common misconceptions and perceived barriers. Information will be provided in both English and Spanish using clear language and culturally appropriate communication.

    **Change Theory**

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and refinement of the educational plan through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, current evidence will be reviewed to identify colorectal cancer screening disparities, educational gaps, and barriers affecting Hispanic adults. During the changing stage, the bilingual educational plan will be developed and revised based on scientific evidence and preceptor feedback. During the refreezing stage, the materials will be finalized and recommendations will be developed for possible future incorporation into patient-education practices at the clinic.

    Lewin’s Change Theory complements Pender’s Health Promotion Model because Pender provides a framework for understanding health beliefs and barriers, while Lewin provides a systematic process for developing and integrating an evidence-based educational change.

    **Project Outcome and Significance**

    The primary outcome of this capstone project will be the completion and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual colorectal cancer screening educational plan designed for Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida. The project will not claim measurable improvement in patient knowledge or screening behavior because the intervention will not be implemented directly with patients.

    The significance of the project is its potential to provide the clinic with a culturally and linguistically appropriate educational resource that addresses an identified preventive healthcare disparity. By integrating evidence-based practice, health-promotion theory, change theory, and the APRN role, the project demonstrates how advanced practice nurses can translate research into practical resources that may support colorectal cancer screening education and reduce communication barriers among Hispanic adults.

    **References**

    Ashad-Bishop, K. C., Nwabudike, S. M., Shah, C., & Kobetz, E. (2023). Hyperlocal disparities in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: An ecological study of social vulnerability in Miami-Dade County.
    _Preventive Medicine Reports, 34_, 102262.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Colorectal cancer incidence_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Deaths from colorectal cancer_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer)

    Hooge, N., Allen, D. H., McKenzie, R., & Pandian, V. (2022). Engaging advanced practice nurses in evidence-based practice: An e-mentoring program.
    _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 19_(3), 235–244.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565](https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565)

    King, S. C., King, J., Thomas, C. C., & Richardson, L. C. (2025). Baseline estimates of colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45 to 75 years, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2022.
    _Preventing Chronic Disease, 22_, 250175.
    [https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175](https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175)

    McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2023).
    _Theoretical basis for nursing_ (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
    [https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ](https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ)

    Montalvan-Sanchez, E. E., Beas, R., Karkash, A., Godoy, A., Norwood, D. A., & Dougherty, M. (2024). Delays in colorectal cancer screening for Latino patients: The role of immigrant healthcare in stemming the rising global incidence of colorectal cancer.
    _Gastroenterology Research, 17_(1), 41–51.
    [https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697](https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697)

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2021). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    _JAMA, 325_(19), 1965–1977.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238)

    **## CapstonePartI.docx**

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criterion** | **Points** | **Requirements for Full Credit** |
    | **PICOT and Proposed Health Problem** | **20** | Thoroughly describe the proposed health problem and clearly explain <br>**what change is being proposed**. Support the significance of the problem with <br>**current data, statistics, and scholarly literature**. Clearly connect the problem to the PICOT question. |
    | **Description of the Population** | **20** | Provide a detailed description of the target population, including relevant <br>**age range, demographic characteristics, setting, health condition, and socioeconomic or clinical factors**. Identify important <br>**risk factors** affecting the population and support them with current scholarly evidence. |
    | **Depth of Discussion and Literature Review** | **20** | Provide an <br>**in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the entire paper**. Include a literature review from scholarly journals describing <br>**evidence-based interventions** that address the identified health problem. Integrate and synthesize information from different sources rather than discussing each source separately. The paper should flow logically from one idea to another and demonstrate a clear relationship among the problem, population, evidence, and proposed intervention. According to the rubric, the discussion should flow smoothly <br>**without unnecessary headings**. |
    | **Theoretical Nursing Framework** | **20** | Select an appropriate <br>**nursing theory, health-promotion model, disease-prevention model, or conceptual framework** that aligns with the proposed health problem. Explain the major concepts of the theory and clearly demonstrate how the framework supports the <br>**population, intervention, implementation, and expected outcomes** of the project. |
    | **Spelling, Grammar, and Required Length** | **10** | The paper should contain <br>**fewer than five grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors**. Academic and professional language should be used throughout. The paper must meet the <br>**entire required word or page count** established by the instructor. |
    | **Sources and Evidence** | **10** | Use <br>**more than five current sources**, with at least <br>**three peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books**. Include both general background evidence and specialized evidence related to the intervention. Any websites used should come from authoritative organizations such as the <br>**CDC, NIH, WHO, or professional healthcare organizations**. Citations and references should follow <br>**APA 7th edition**. |
    | **TOTAL** | **100/100** | **All Outstanding criteria must be fully addressed.** |

    **## CapstoneProjectSummary.docx**

    **Capstone Project Summary**

    **Background and Identification of the Problem**

    Colorectal cancer is an important public health concern and remains a significant cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Screening is an essential preventive strategy because it can identify precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer at earlier stages, when treatment may be more effective. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021) recommends colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 45 for average-risk adults and continuing through age 75.

    Despite established screening recommendations, disparities remain among Hispanic adults. Nationally, 61.4% of adults aged 45–75 were up to date with colorectal cancer screening in 2022; however, only 52.4% of Hispanic adults were current with screening, compared with 63.5% of non-Hispanic White adults. In addition, 41.7% of Hispanic adults had never undergone colorectal cancer screening. Screening disparities are especially evident among younger adults aged 45–49, among whom only 29.8% were up to date with screening and 65.7% had never been screened (King et al., 2025).

    Local data also demonstrate the relevance of this problem. Miami-Dade County reported approximately 1,320 new colorectal cancer cases in 2023, corresponding to an age-adjusted incidence rate of 36.5 cases per 100,000 population. In 2024, approximately 456 colorectal cancer deaths occurred in Miami-Dade County, representing an age-adjusted mortality rate of 12.2 deaths per 100,000 population (Florida Department of Health, 2026). Furthermore, Ashad-Bishop et al. (2023) found that colorectal cancer screening rates across Miami-Dade County averaged approximately 59%, but rates decreased to approximately 53.3% in communities with greater social vulnerability. These findings demonstrate that countywide statistics may conceal important disparities within individual neighborhoods and underserved communities.

    **Population and Setting**

    The initial population for this project consisted of Hispanic adults aged 45–75 living throughout Miami-Dade County. However, this population was determined to be too broad for a 12-week capstone project. Therefore, the population was narrowed to Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a specific community clinic in Hialeah, Florida.

    Hialeah is an appropriate setting because the community includes a large Hispanic and Spanish-speaking population. Hispanic adults may encounter several barriers to colorectal cancer screening, including limited awareness, language discordance, lack of health insurance, financial concerns, limited healthcare access, fear, cultural beliefs, and misunderstanding of available screening methods. Montalvan-Sanchez et al. (2024) identified limited awareness, access problems, and language differences as important factors that can delay colorectal cancer screening among Latino and immigrant populations.

    These barriers are significant because inadequate knowledge and delayed screening may contribute to later diagnosis, more aggressive treatment, greater healthcare costs, decreased quality of life, hospitalization, and premature mortality. A bilingual and culturally responsive educational resource may therefore help address misconceptions and communication barriers within this population.

    **PICOT Question**

    In Hispanic adults aged 45 to 75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida (P), how would the development of a bilingual teaching plan about colorectal cancer screening (I), compared with standard educational information (C), support improved colorectal cancer screening education (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    Because the educational intervention will not be implemented directly with patients, the project will not measure actual changes in patient knowledge or screening behavior. Instead, the primary outcome will be the development and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual educational product.

    **Proposed Intervention**

    The proposed intervention is the development of a simple, culturally appropriate bilingual teaching plan in English and Spanish addressing colorectal cancer screening. The educational materials will explain the importance of screening, the recommended starting age, available screening options, the role of early detection, and common misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer and screening procedures.

    The educational plan will incorporate understandable language, culturally appropriate content, and visual aids when appropriate. The project will be completed over 12 weeks and will include a review of current evidence, development of the bilingual educational materials, evaluation by the preceptor or qualified healthcare professionals, revision based on feedback, and final presentation of the completed educational product.

    No patients will be recruited, no surveys will be administered, and no identifiable health information will be accessed. Consequently, the project will focus exclusively on creating and evaluating an evidence-based educational resource rather than conducting direct human-subject research.

    **Evidence-Based Practice and APRN Role**

    Evidence-based practice is fundamental to this capstone because it integrates the best available scientific evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, cultural considerations, and healthcare-setting characteristics. APRNs have an important role in identifying clinical practice problems, critically evaluating research, translating evidence into practice, and developing interventions that respond to population-specific healthcare needs. Strengthening evidence-based practice knowledge among advanced practice nurses can support healthcare environments in which clinical decisions are consistently informed by current evidence (Hooge et al., 2022).

    In this capstone project, the APRN will function as an evidence translator, educator, collaborator, and change agent. The APRN role includes reviewing current literature related to colorectal cancer screening, identifying gaps in preventive health education, developing culturally and linguistically appropriate materials, ensuring consistency with current screening recommendations, collaborating with the preceptor, and evaluating the quality of the final educational product.

    The literature supports bilingual education, culturally appropriate communication, community outreach, and patient navigation as strategies that may help reduce barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Hispanic populations (Montalvan-Sanchez et al., 2024). Therefore, the proposed educational plan represents a practical application of evidence-based practice to an identified health disparity.

    **Nursing Theoretical Framework**

    Pender’s Health Promotion Model will serve as the nursing theoretical framework for the project. The model emphasizes how individual characteristics, previous experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, interpersonal influences, cultural factors, and self-efficacy influence health-promoting behaviors (McEwen & Wills, 2023).

    Pender’s model is appropriate for this project because Hispanic adults may experience barriers such as language differences, fear, limited knowledge, financial concerns, and uncertainty regarding available screening procedures. The educational materials will be designed to increase awareness of the benefits of colorectal cancer screening while addressing common misconceptions and perceived barriers. Information will be provided in both English and Spanish using clear language and culturally appropriate communication.

    **Change Theory**

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the development and refinement of the educational plan through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, current evidence will be reviewed to identify colorectal cancer screening disparities, educational gaps, and barriers affecting Hispanic adults. During the changing stage, the bilingual educational plan will be developed and revised based on scientific evidence and preceptor feedback. During the refreezing stage, the materials will be finalized and recommendations will be developed for possible future incorporation into patient-education practices at the clinic.

    Lewin’s Change Theory complements Pender’s Health Promotion Model because Pender provides a framework for understanding health beliefs and barriers, while Lewin provides a systematic process for developing and integrating an evidence-based educational change.

    **Project Outcome and Significance**

    The primary outcome of this capstone project will be the completion and expert evaluation of an evidence-based bilingual colorectal cancer screening educational plan designed for Hispanic adults aged 45–75 receiving care at a community clinic in Hialeah, Florida. The project will not claim measurable improvement in patient knowledge or screening behavior because the intervention will not be implemented directly with patients.

    The significance of the project is its potential to provide the clinic with a culturally and linguistically appropriate educational resource that addresses an identified preventive healthcare disparity. By integrating evidence-based practice, health-promotion theory, change theory, and the APRN role, the project demonstrates how advanced practice nurses can translate research into practical resources that may support colorectal cancer screening education and reduce communication barriers among Hispanic adults.

    **References**

    Ashad-Bishop, K. C., Nwabudike, S. M., Shah, C., & Kobetz, E. (2023). Hyperlocal disparities in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: An ecological study of social vulnerability in Miami-Dade County.
    _Preventive Medicine Reports, 34_, 102262.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102262)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Colorectal cancer incidence_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=0445&rdReport=NonVitalInd.Dataviewer)

    Florida Department of Health. (2026).
    _Deaths from colorectal cancer_. FLHealthCHARTS.
    [https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer](https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsDashboards/rdPage.aspx?cid=89&rdReport=Death.Dataviewer)

    Hooge, N., Allen, D. H., McKenzie, R., & Pandian, V. (2022). Engaging advanced practice nurses in evidence-based practice: An e-mentoring program.
    _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 19_(3), 235–244.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565](https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12565)

    King, S. C., King, J., Thomas, C. C., & Richardson, L. C. (2025). Baseline estimates of colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45 to 75 years, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2022.
    _Preventing Chronic Disease, 22_, 250175.
    [https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175](https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.250175)

    McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2023).
    _Theoretical basis for nursing_ (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
    [https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ](https://books.google.com/books?id=Cft4zgEACAAJ)

    Montalvan-Sanchez, E. E., Beas, R., Karkash, A., Godoy, A., Norwood, D. A., & Dougherty, M. (2024). Delays in colorectal cancer screening for Latino patients: The role of immigrant healthcare in stemming the rising global incidence of colorectal cancer.
    _Gastroenterology Research, 17_(1), 41–51.
    [https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697](https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1697)

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2021). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    _JAMA, 325_(19), 1965–1977.
    [https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238](https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238)

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (2)** – ## CapstonePartI.docx – ## Discussions.docx **## CapstonePartI.docx** Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm** **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that ha…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## CapstonePartI.docx

    – ## Discussions.docx

    **## CapstonePartI.docx**

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criterion** | **Points** | **Requirements for Full Credit** |
    | **PICOT and Proposed Health Problem** | **20** | Thoroughly describe the proposed health problem and clearly explain <br>**what change is being proposed**. Support the significance of the problem with <br>**current data, statistics, and scholarly literature**. Clearly connect the problem to the PICOT question. |
    | **Description of the Population** | **20** | Provide a detailed description of the target population, including relevant <br>**age range, demographic characteristics, setting, health condition, and socioeconomic or clinical factors**. Identify important <br>**risk factors** affecting the population and support them with current scholarly evidence. |
    | **Depth of Discussion and Literature Review** | **20** | Provide an <br>**in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the entire paper**. Include a literature review from scholarly journals describing <br>**evidence-based interventions** that address the identified health problem. Integrate and synthesize information from different sources rather than discussing each source separately. The paper should flow logically from one idea to another and demonstrate a clear relationship among the problem, population, evidence, and proposed intervention. According to the rubric, the discussion should flow smoothly <br>**without unnecessary headings**. |
    | **Theoretical Nursing Framework** | **20** | Select an appropriate <br>**nursing theory, health-promotion model, disease-prevention model, or conceptual framework** that aligns with the proposed health problem. Explain the major concepts of the theory and clearly demonstrate how the framework supports the <br>**population, intervention, implementation, and expected outcomes** of the project. |
    | **Spelling, Grammar, and Required Length** | **10** | The paper should contain <br>**fewer than five grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors**. Academic and professional language should be used throughout. The paper must meet the <br>**entire required word or page count** established by the instructor. |
    | **Sources and Evidence** | **10** | Use <br>**more than five current sources**, with at least <br>**three peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books**. Include both general background evidence and specialized evidence related to the intervention. Any websites used should come from authoritative organizations such as the <br>**CDC, NIH, WHO, or professional healthcare organizations**. Citations and references should follow <br>**APA 7th edition**. |
    | **TOTAL** | **100/100** | **All Outstanding criteria must be fully addressed.** |

    **## Discussions.docx**

    **Discussion Post: PICOT Question**

    The healthcare problem I propose to change is obesity among low-income Hispanic adults. Obesity increases the risk of health problems such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, joint pain, and limited mobility. Approximately 40.3% of adults in the United States have obesity, demonstrating the seriousness of this healthcare problem (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    **PICOT question**

    In low-income Hispanic adults with obesity who receive care at a community clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), how does a nurse-led educational program about healthy nutrition and physical activity (I), compared with their initial weight before the program (C), affect weight loss (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    The setting for this project will be a community-based primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The population will include Hispanic adults between 18 and 64 years of age with a body mass index of 30 kg/m² or greater. These patients may experience barriers to weight management, including limited income, lack of nutrition education, language differences, and reduced access to healthy foods or safe places for exercise.

    The proposed intervention will provide simple bilingual education about healthy eating, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Nurses are well positioned to provide health education, encouragement, psychological support, and follow-up for adults with obesity (Sen et al., 2025).

    Obesity affects patients by increasing chronic disease risk, emotional distress, physical limitations, and difficulty completing daily activities. These problems may decrease quality of life and increase healthcare visits and treatment costs. Obesity-related conditions can also contribute to hospitalizations and possible readmissions when diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease is not adequately controlled. At the community level, obesity increases the demand for primary care, emergency services, medications, and chronic disease management.

    The purpose of this quality-improvement project is to determine whether a simple, nurse-led educational program can help participants achieve measurable weight loss. Even a modest weight reduction may improve mobility, chronic disease control, and overall well-being while potentially decreasing future healthcare utilization.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Top of Form

    I plan to focus on low-income Hispanic adults receiving primary care in Hialeah, particularly within ZIP code 33012. I selected this area because it has a predominantly Hispanic population and includes patients who may experience financial, linguistic, transportation, and food-access barriers affecting weight management. Research conducted among Hispanic adults in Miami-Dade identified financial limitations, inadequate access to healthy foods, and insufficient culturally appropriate education as barriers to preventing obesity and related diseases (Martin et al., 2022).

    Current public statistics do not demonstrate that Hialeah’s overall adult obesity prevalence is higher than the national prevalence. In 2023, approximately 30.9% of Hialeah adults had obesity, with a 95% confidence interval of 26.2%–35.9% (Miami-Dade Matters, 2023). Nationally, 40.3% of adults had obesity during August 2021–August 2023 (Emmerich et al., 2024). Therefore, I cannot conclude that Hialeah’s overall population has statistically more obesity than the national population.

    Nevertheless, my project will examine a specifically selected high-risk clinical population: low-income Hispanic adults with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or greater. Before implementing the intervention, I will conduct a baseline review of deidentified clinic data to determine the number and percentage of eligible patients with obesity. This clinic-specific statistic will document the local need and provide evidence supporting the educational intervention. Participants’ baseline weights will then be compared with their weights after 12 weeks.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm)

    Martin, M. P., Obioha, C. U., Gaikwad, S., et al. (2022). Perceptions, awareness, and barriers to care regarding obesity and diabetes among Latinx in Miami and Escambia, Florida.
    _Journal of Global Health Reports, 6_, e2022003.
    [https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.30829](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Miami-Dade Matters. (2023).
    _Adults who are obese: Hialeah_.
    [https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators](https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    **Nursing and Change Theories for the Capstone Project**

    The nursing theory selected for this capstone project is Pender’s Health Promotion Model. This model is appropriate because the proposed intervention focuses on helping low-income Hispanic adults adopt healthier nutrition and physical activity behaviors. The model recognizes that health behaviors are influenced by personal experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, interpersonal support, and environmental factors (Alligood, 2022). These concepts are particularly relevant for patients in Hialeah ZIP code 33012 who may encounter financial limitations, language differences, transportation problems, and limited access to healthy foods.

    Pender’s model will be incorporated by assessing each participant’s perceived barriers, cultural food preferences, readiness to change, and confidence in managing weight. The nurse-led program will provide culturally appropriate bilingual education concerning portion control, affordable food choices, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Participants will establish individualized weekly goals and monitor their weight. Nurses will reinforce progress, address barriers, and encourage self-efficacy. This approach aligns with evidence indicating that nurses have important educational, motivational, and supportive roles in adult weight management (Sen et al., 2025).

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the project through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, baseline clinic data will be reviewed, and participants and clinic stakeholders will receive information about obesity risks and the need for change. The changing stage will include implementation of the 12-week bilingual educational program, weekly weight monitoring, goal setting, and ongoing nursing support. During the refreezing stage, participants will receive strategies for sustaining healthier behaviors, while clinic staff will consider incorporating effective educational materials and follow-up procedures into routine practice. Lewin’s model is suitable because structured preparation, stakeholder engagement, implementation support, and reinforcement can facilitate sustainable healthcare improvements (Volpendesta et al., 2026). Together, these theories will guide both individual behavioral change and organizational adoption of the intervention.

    **References**

    Alligood, M. R. (2022).
    _Nursing theorists and their work_ (10th ed.). Elsevier.
    [https://www.elsevier.com/books/nursing-theorists-and-their-work/alligood/978-0-323-75702-7](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Volpendesta, C., Graham, N., Collins, E., & Kirchhoff, A. (2026). Transforming quality and patient experience in postpandemic nursing: A strategic collaboration between system and local leaders using Lewin’s change model.
    _Nurse Leader, 24_(1), 102574.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2025.102574](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    **Evidence-Based Practice and the Capstone PICOT**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to clinical decision-making that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, and individual circumstances. In nursing, EBP is important because it supports safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care while encouraging healthcare professionals to evaluate whether current practices are producing the desired outcomes. Advanced practice nurses play an important role in identifying clinical problems, critically evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and measuring patient outcomes (Ylimäki et al., 2024).

    Through my review of the literature related to my PICOT question, I have discovered that obesity management requires more than simply advising patients to lose weight. Effective interventions should address nutrition, physical activity, motivation, behavioral change, cultural preferences, socioeconomic barriers, and continued follow-up. This is particularly important for low-income Hispanic adults who may experience barriers such as limited access to healthy foods, financial challenges, language differences, and limited opportunities for physical activity. Evidence supports nurses as important participants in obesity prevention and management because they can provide education, behavioral support, motivation, monitoring, and continuity of care (Sen et al., 2025). Therefore, the literature supports the use of a nurse-led bilingual educational intervention focusing on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals.

    APRNs are directly involved in EBP throughout this capstone project. The APRN can identify the practice problem, formulate the PICOT question, search and critically evaluate current literature, develop the educational intervention, and monitor outcomes. APRNs can also assess participants' readiness for behavioral change, identify individual barriers, provide culturally appropriate education, and collaborate with interdisciplinary team members. Ylimäki et al. (2024) found that advanced practice nurses demonstrate important competencies in evidence transfer and implementation, emphasizing their role in translating research into clinical practice. In this capstone project, weight measurements obtained before and after the 12-week intervention will provide objective data for evaluating effectiveness. Ultimately, EBP allows the APRN to connect current scientific evidence with culturally responsive nursing interventions to improve outcomes among adults experiencing obesity.

    **References**

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Ylimäki, S., Oikarinen, A., Kääriäinen, M., Tuomikoski, A.-M., et al. (2024). Advanced practice nurses’ evidence-based healthcare competence and associated factors: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075)

    Current statistical evidence demonstrates the magnitude and economic burden of obesity in the United States. Approximately
    **40.3% of U.S. adults** were living with obesity during 2021–2023, demonstrating that obesity continues to represent a major public health concern (Fryar et al., 2026). Disparities are also evident among Hispanic populations. Recent CDC surveillance data indicate that Hispanic adults had an obesity prevalence of at least 35% in 33 U.S. states and territories with sufficient data, emphasizing the disproportionate burden experienced by this population (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). Socioeconomic conditions further contribute to obesity risk because cumulative social disadvantage has been associated with substantially higher prevalence of obesity, particularly more severe classes of obesity (Almandoz et al., 2022).

    The financial impact is also considerable. Obesity is estimated to cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly
    **$173 billion annually** (CDC, 2026). Additionally, research has demonstrated that adults with obesity experience significantly greater annual healthcare expenditures than adults of normal weight, with costs increasing as obesity severity increases (Cawley et al., 2021). These demographic, clinical, and economic findings support implementing a culturally appropriate, nurse-led bilingual nutrition and physical-activity intervention among low-income Hispanic adults. Changes in participants’ weight will be measured from baseline through the end of the
    **12-week intervention period**.

    **References**

    Almandoz, J. P., Xie, L., Schellinger, J. N., Mathew, M. S., Gazda, C., Ofori, A., Kuk, J. L., & Messiah, S. E. (2022). Social determinants of health and obesity: Findings from a national study of US adults.
    _Obesity, 30_(2), 491–502.
    [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/)

    Cawley, J., Biener, A., Meyerhoefer, C., Ding, Y., Zvenyach, T., Smolarz, B. G., & Ramasamy, A. (2021). Direct medical costs of obesity in the United States and the most populous states.
    _Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 27_(3), 354–366.
    [https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410](https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025).
    _Adult obesity prevalence maps_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026).
    _Fast facts: Health and economic costs of chronic conditions_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html](https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html)

    Fryar, C. D., Afful, J., & Saif, N. T. (2026).
    _Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among adults age 20 and older: United States, 1960–1962 through August 2021–August 2023_. National Center for Health Statistics.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm)

    Bottom of Form

    **## Discussions.docx**

    **Discussion Post: PICOT Question**

    The healthcare problem I propose to change is obesity among low-income Hispanic adults. Obesity increases the risk of health problems such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, joint pain, and limited mobility. Approximately 40.3% of adults in the United States have obesity, demonstrating the seriousness of this healthcare problem (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    **PICOT question**

    In low-income Hispanic adults with obesity who receive care at a community clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), how does a nurse-led educational program about healthy nutrition and physical activity (I), compared with their initial weight before the program (C), affect weight loss (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    The setting for this project will be a community-based primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The population will include Hispanic adults between 18 and 64 years of age with a body mass index of 30 kg/m² or greater. These patients may experience barriers to weight management, including limited income, lack of nutrition education, language differences, and reduced access to healthy foods or safe places for exercise.

    The proposed intervention will provide simple bilingual education about healthy eating, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Nurses are well positioned to provide health education, encouragement, psychological support, and follow-up for adults with obesity (Sen et al., 2025).

    Obesity affects patients by increasing chronic disease risk, emotional distress, physical limitations, and difficulty completing daily activities. These problems may decrease quality of life and increase healthcare visits and treatment costs. Obesity-related conditions can also contribute to hospitalizations and possible readmissions when diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease is not adequately controlled. At the community level, obesity increases the demand for primary care, emergency services, medications, and chronic disease management.

    The purpose of this quality-improvement project is to determine whether a simple, nurse-led educational program can help participants achieve measurable weight loss. Even a modest weight reduction may improve mobility, chronic disease control, and overall well-being while potentially decreasing future healthcare utilization.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Top of Form

    I plan to focus on low-income Hispanic adults receiving primary care in Hialeah, particularly within ZIP code 33012. I selected this area because it has a predominantly Hispanic population and includes patients who may experience financial, linguistic, transportation, and food-access barriers affecting weight management. Research conducted among Hispanic adults in Miami-Dade identified financial limitations, inadequate access to healthy foods, and insufficient culturally appropriate education as barriers to preventing obesity and related diseases (Martin et al., 2022).

    Current public statistics do not demonstrate that Hialeah’s overall adult obesity prevalence is higher than the national prevalence. In 2023, approximately 30.9% of Hialeah adults had obesity, with a 95% confidence interval of 26.2%–35.9% (Miami-Dade Matters, 2023). Nationally, 40.3% of adults had obesity during August 2021–August 2023 (Emmerich et al., 2024). Therefore, I cannot conclude that Hialeah’s overall population has statistically more obesity than the national population.

    Nevertheless, my project will examine a specifically selected high-risk clinical population: low-income Hispanic adults with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or greater. Before implementing the intervention, I will conduct a baseline review of deidentified clinic data to determine the number and percentage of eligible patients with obesity. This clinic-specific statistic will document the local need and provide evidence supporting the educational intervention. Participants’ baseline weights will then be compared with their weights after 12 weeks.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm)

    Martin, M. P., Obioha, C. U., Gaikwad, S., et al. (2022). Perceptions, awareness, and barriers to care regarding obesity and diabetes among Latinx in Miami and Escambia, Florida.
    _Journal of Global Health Reports, 6_, e2022003.
    [https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.30829](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Miami-Dade Matters. (2023).
    _Adults who are obese: Hialeah_.
    [https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators](https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    **Nursing and Change Theories for the Capstone Project**

    The nursing theory selected for this capstone project is Pender’s Health Promotion Model. This model is appropriate because the proposed intervention focuses on helping low-income Hispanic adults adopt healthier nutrition and physical activity behaviors. The model recognizes that health behaviors are influenced by personal experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, interpersonal support, and environmental factors (Alligood, 2022). These concepts are particularly relevant for patients in Hialeah ZIP code 33012 who may encounter financial limitations, language differences, transportation problems, and limited access to healthy foods.

    Pender’s model will be incorporated by assessing each participant’s perceived barriers, cultural food preferences, readiness to change, and confidence in managing weight. The nurse-led program will provide culturally appropriate bilingual education concerning portion control, affordable food choices, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Participants will establish individualized weekly goals and monitor their weight. Nurses will reinforce progress, address barriers, and encourage self-efficacy. This approach aligns with evidence indicating that nurses have important educational, motivational, and supportive roles in adult weight management (Sen et al., 2025).

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the project through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, baseline clinic data will be reviewed, and participants and clinic stakeholders will receive information about obesity risks and the need for change. The changing stage will include implementation of the 12-week bilingual educational program, weekly weight monitoring, goal setting, and ongoing nursing support. During the refreezing stage, participants will receive strategies for sustaining healthier behaviors, while clinic staff will consider incorporating effective educational materials and follow-up procedures into routine practice. Lewin’s model is suitable because structured preparation, stakeholder engagement, implementation support, and reinforcement can facilitate sustainable healthcare improvements (Volpendesta et al., 2026). Together, these theories will guide both individual behavioral change and organizational adoption of the intervention.

    **References**

    Alligood, M. R. (2022).
    _Nursing theorists and their work_ (10th ed.). Elsevier.
    [https://www.elsevier.com/books/nursing-theorists-and-their-work/alligood/978-0-323-75702-7](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Volpendesta, C., Graham, N., Collins, E., & Kirchhoff, A. (2026). Transforming quality and patient experience in postpandemic nursing: A strategic collaboration between system and local leaders using Lewin’s change model.
    _Nurse Leader, 24_(1), 102574.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2025.102574](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    **Evidence-Based Practice and the Capstone PICOT**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to clinical decision-making that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, and individual circumstances. In nursing, EBP is important because it supports safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care while encouraging healthcare professionals to evaluate whether current practices are producing the desired outcomes. Advanced practice nurses play an important role in identifying clinical problems, critically evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and measuring patient outcomes (Ylimäki et al., 2024).

    Through my review of the literature related to my PICOT question, I have discovered that obesity management requires more than simply advising patients to lose weight. Effective interventions should address nutrition, physical activity, motivation, behavioral change, cultural preferences, socioeconomic barriers, and continued follow-up. This is particularly important for low-income Hispanic adults who may experience barriers such as limited access to healthy foods, financial challenges, language differences, and limited opportunities for physical activity. Evidence supports nurses as important participants in obesity prevention and management because they can provide education, behavioral support, motivation, monitoring, and continuity of care (Sen et al., 2025). Therefore, the literature supports the use of a nurse-led bilingual educational intervention focusing on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals.

    APRNs are directly involved in EBP throughout this capstone project. The APRN can identify the practice problem, formulate the PICOT question, search and critically evaluate current literature, develop the educational intervention, and monitor outcomes. APRNs can also assess participants' readiness for behavioral change, identify individual barriers, provide culturally appropriate education, and collaborate with interdisciplinary team members. Ylimäki et al. (2024) found that advanced practice nurses demonstrate important competencies in evidence transfer and implementation, emphasizing their role in translating research into clinical practice. In this capstone project, weight measurements obtained before and after the 12-week intervention will provide objective data for evaluating effectiveness. Ultimately, EBP allows the APRN to connect current scientific evidence with culturally responsive nursing interventions to improve outcomes among adults experiencing obesity.

    **References**

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Ylimäki, S., Oikarinen, A., Kääriäinen, M., Tuomikoski, A.-M., et al. (2024). Advanced practice nurses’ evidence-based healthcare competence and associated factors: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075)

    Current statistical evidence demonstrates the magnitude and economic burden of obesity in the United States. Approximately
    **40.3% of U.S. adults** were living with obesity during 2021–2023, demonstrating that obesity continues to represent a major public health concern (Fryar et al., 2026). Disparities are also evident among Hispanic populations. Recent CDC surveillance data indicate that Hispanic adults had an obesity prevalence of at least 35% in 33 U.S. states and territories with sufficient data, emphasizing the disproportionate burden experienced by this population (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). Socioeconomic conditions further contribute to obesity risk because cumulative social disadvantage has been associated with substantially higher prevalence of obesity, particularly more severe classes of obesity (Almandoz et al., 2022).

    The financial impact is also considerable. Obesity is estimated to cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly
    **$173 billion annually** (CDC, 2026). Additionally, research has demonstrated that adults with obesity experience significantly greater annual healthcare expenditures than adults of normal weight, with costs increasing as obesity severity increases (Cawley et al., 2021). These demographic, clinical, and economic findings support implementing a culturally appropriate, nurse-led bilingual nutrition and physical-activity intervention among low-income Hispanic adults. Changes in participants’ weight will be measured from baseline through the end of the
    **12-week intervention period**.

    **References**

    Almandoz, J. P., Xie, L., Schellinger, J. N., Mathew, M. S., Gazda, C., Ofori, A., Kuk, J. L., & Messiah, S. E. (2022). Social determinants of health and obesity: Findings from a national study of US adults.
    _Obesity, 30_(2), 491–502.
    [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/)

    Cawley, J., Biener, A., Meyerhoefer, C., Ding, Y., Zvenyach, T., Smolarz, B. G., & Ramasamy, A. (2021). Direct medical costs of obesity in the United States and the most populous states.
    _Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 27_(3), 354–366.
    [https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410](https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025).
    _Adult obesity prevalence maps_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026).
    _Fast facts: Health and economic costs of chronic conditions_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html](https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html)

    Fryar, C. D., Afful, J., & Saif, N. T. (2026).
    _Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among adults age 20 and older: United States, 1960–1962 through August 2021–August 2023_. National Center for Health Statistics.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm)

    Bottom of Form

    **## CapstonePartI.docx**

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criterion** | **Points** | **Requirements for Full Credit** |
    | **PICOT and Proposed Health Problem** | **20** | Thoroughly describe the proposed health problem and clearly explain <br>**what change is being proposed**. Support the significance of the problem with <br>**current data, statistics, and scholarly literature**. Clearly connect the problem to the PICOT question. |
    | **Description of the Population** | **20** | Provide a detailed description of the target population, including relevant <br>**age range, demographic characteristics, setting, health condition, and socioeconomic or clinical factors**. Identify important <br>**risk factors** affecting the population and support them with current scholarly evidence. |
    | **Depth of Discussion and Literature Review** | **20** | Provide an <br>**in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the entire paper**. Include a literature review from scholarly journals describing <br>**evidence-based interventions** that address the identified health problem. Integrate and synthesize information from different sources rather than discussing each source separately. The paper should flow logically from one idea to another and demonstrate a clear relationship among the problem, population, evidence, and proposed intervention. According to the rubric, the discussion should flow smoothly <br>**without unnecessary headings**. |
    | **Theoretical Nursing Framework** | **20** | Select an appropriate <br>**nursing theory, health-promotion model, disease-prevention model, or conceptual framework** that aligns with the proposed health problem. Explain the major concepts of the theory and clearly demonstrate how the framework supports the <br>**population, intervention, implementation, and expected outcomes** of the project. |
    | **Spelling, Grammar, and Required Length** | **10** | The paper should contain <br>**fewer than five grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors**. Academic and professional language should be used throughout. The paper must meet the <br>**entire required word or page count** established by the instructor. |
    | **Sources and Evidence** | **10** | Use <br>**more than five current sources**, with at least <br>**three peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books**. Include both general background evidence and specialized evidence related to the intervention. Any websites used should come from authoritative organizations such as the <br>**CDC, NIH, WHO, or professional healthcare organizations**. Citations and references should follow <br>**APA 7th edition**. |
    | **TOTAL** | **100/100** | **All Outstanding criteria must be fully addressed.** |

    **## Discussions.docx**

    **Discussion Post: PICOT Question**

    The healthcare problem I propose to change is obesity among low-income Hispanic adults. Obesity increases the risk of health problems such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, joint pain, and limited mobility. Approximately 40.3% of adults in the United States have obesity, demonstrating the seriousness of this healthcare problem (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    **PICOT question**

    In low-income Hispanic adults with obesity who receive care at a community clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), how does a nurse-led educational program about healthy nutrition and physical activity (I), compared with their initial weight before the program (C), affect weight loss (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    The setting for this project will be a community-based primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The population will include Hispanic adults between 18 and 64 years of age with a body mass index of 30 kg/m² or greater. These patients may experience barriers to weight management, including limited income, lack of nutrition education, language differences, and reduced access to healthy foods or safe places for exercise.

    The proposed intervention will provide simple bilingual education about healthy eating, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Nurses are well positioned to provide health education, encouragement, psychological support, and follow-up for adults with obesity (Sen et al., 2025).

    Obesity affects patients by increasing chronic disease risk, emotional distress, physical limitations, and difficulty completing daily activities. These problems may decrease quality of life and increase healthcare visits and treatment costs. Obesity-related conditions can also contribute to hospitalizations and possible readmissions when diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease is not adequately controlled. At the community level, obesity increases the demand for primary care, emergency services, medications, and chronic disease management.

    The purpose of this quality-improvement project is to determine whether a simple, nurse-led educational program can help participants achieve measurable weight loss. Even a modest weight reduction may improve mobility, chronic disease control, and overall well-being while potentially decreasing future healthcare utilization.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Top of Form

    I plan to focus on low-income Hispanic adults receiving primary care in Hialeah, particularly within ZIP code 33012. I selected this area because it has a predominantly Hispanic population and includes patients who may experience financial, linguistic, transportation, and food-access barriers affecting weight management. Research conducted among Hispanic adults in Miami-Dade identified financial limitations, inadequate access to healthy foods, and insufficient culturally appropriate education as barriers to preventing obesity and related diseases (Martin et al., 2022).

    Current public statistics do not demonstrate that Hialeah’s overall adult obesity prevalence is higher than the national prevalence. In 2023, approximately 30.9% of Hialeah adults had obesity, with a 95% confidence interval of 26.2%–35.9% (Miami-Dade Matters, 2023). Nationally, 40.3% of adults had obesity during August 2021–August 2023 (Emmerich et al., 2024). Therefore, I cannot conclude that Hialeah’s overall population has statistically more obesity than the national population.

    Nevertheless, my project will examine a specifically selected high-risk clinical population: low-income Hispanic adults with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or greater. Before implementing the intervention, I will conduct a baseline review of deidentified clinic data to determine the number and percentage of eligible patients with obesity. This clinic-specific statistic will document the local need and provide evidence supporting the educational intervention. Participants’ baseline weights will then be compared with their weights after 12 weeks.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm)

    Martin, M. P., Obioha, C. U., Gaikwad, S., et al. (2022). Perceptions, awareness, and barriers to care regarding obesity and diabetes among Latinx in Miami and Escambia, Florida.
    _Journal of Global Health Reports, 6_, e2022003.
    [https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.30829](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Miami-Dade Matters. (2023).
    _Adults who are obese: Hialeah_.
    [https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators](https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    **Nursing and Change Theories for the Capstone Project**

    The nursing theory selected for this capstone project is Pender’s Health Promotion Model. This model is appropriate because the proposed intervention focuses on helping low-income Hispanic adults adopt healthier nutrition and physical activity behaviors. The model recognizes that health behaviors are influenced by personal experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, interpersonal support, and environmental factors (Alligood, 2022). These concepts are particularly relevant for patients in Hialeah ZIP code 33012 who may encounter financial limitations, language differences, transportation problems, and limited access to healthy foods.

    Pender’s model will be incorporated by assessing each participant’s perceived barriers, cultural food preferences, readiness to change, and confidence in managing weight. The nurse-led program will provide culturally appropriate bilingual education concerning portion control, affordable food choices, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Participants will establish individualized weekly goals and monitor their weight. Nurses will reinforce progress, address barriers, and encourage self-efficacy. This approach aligns with evidence indicating that nurses have important educational, motivational, and supportive roles in adult weight management (Sen et al., 2025).

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the project through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, baseline clinic data will be reviewed, and participants and clinic stakeholders will receive information about obesity risks and the need for change. The changing stage will include implementation of the 12-week bilingual educational program, weekly weight monitoring, goal setting, and ongoing nursing support. During the refreezing stage, participants will receive strategies for sustaining healthier behaviors, while clinic staff will consider incorporating effective educational materials and follow-up procedures into routine practice. Lewin’s model is suitable because structured preparation, stakeholder engagement, implementation support, and reinforcement can facilitate sustainable healthcare improvements (Volpendesta et al., 2026). Together, these theories will guide both individual behavioral change and organizational adoption of the intervention.

    **References**

    Alligood, M. R. (2022).
    _Nursing theorists and their work_ (10th ed.). Elsevier.
    [https://www.elsevier.com/books/nursing-theorists-and-their-work/alligood/978-0-323-75702-7](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Volpendesta, C., Graham, N., Collins, E., & Kirchhoff, A. (2026). Transforming quality and patient experience in postpandemic nursing: A strategic collaboration between system and local leaders using Lewin’s change model.
    _Nurse Leader, 24_(1), 102574.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2025.102574](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    **Evidence-Based Practice and the Capstone PICOT**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to clinical decision-making that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, and individual circumstances. In nursing, EBP is important because it supports safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care while encouraging healthcare professionals to evaluate whether current practices are producing the desired outcomes. Advanced practice nurses play an important role in identifying clinical problems, critically evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and measuring patient outcomes (Ylimäki et al., 2024).

    Through my review of the literature related to my PICOT question, I have discovered that obesity management requires more than simply advising patients to lose weight. Effective interventions should address nutrition, physical activity, motivation, behavioral change, cultural preferences, socioeconomic barriers, and continued follow-up. This is particularly important for low-income Hispanic adults who may experience barriers such as limited access to healthy foods, financial challenges, language differences, and limited opportunities for physical activity. Evidence supports nurses as important participants in obesity prevention and management because they can provide education, behavioral support, motivation, monitoring, and continuity of care (Sen et al., 2025). Therefore, the literature supports the use of a nurse-led bilingual educational intervention focusing on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals.

    APRNs are directly involved in EBP throughout this capstone project. The APRN can identify the practice problem, formulate the PICOT question, search and critically evaluate current literature, develop the educational intervention, and monitor outcomes. APRNs can also assess participants' readiness for behavioral change, identify individual barriers, provide culturally appropriate education, and collaborate with interdisciplinary team members. Ylimäki et al. (2024) found that advanced practice nurses demonstrate important competencies in evidence transfer and implementation, emphasizing their role in translating research into clinical practice. In this capstone project, weight measurements obtained before and after the 12-week intervention will provide objective data for evaluating effectiveness. Ultimately, EBP allows the APRN to connect current scientific evidence with culturally responsive nursing interventions to improve outcomes among adults experiencing obesity.

    **References**

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Ylimäki, S., Oikarinen, A., Kääriäinen, M., Tuomikoski, A.-M., et al. (2024). Advanced practice nurses’ evidence-based healthcare competence and associated factors: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075)

    Current statistical evidence demonstrates the magnitude and economic burden of obesity in the United States. Approximately
    **40.3% of U.S. adults** were living with obesity during 2021–2023, demonstrating that obesity continues to represent a major public health concern (Fryar et al., 2026). Disparities are also evident among Hispanic populations. Recent CDC surveillance data indicate that Hispanic adults had an obesity prevalence of at least 35% in 33 U.S. states and territories with sufficient data, emphasizing the disproportionate burden experienced by this population (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). Socioeconomic conditions further contribute to obesity risk because cumulative social disadvantage has been associated with substantially higher prevalence of obesity, particularly more severe classes of obesity (Almandoz et al., 2022).

    The financial impact is also considerable. Obesity is estimated to cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly
    **$173 billion annually** (CDC, 2026). Additionally, research has demonstrated that adults with obesity experience significantly greater annual healthcare expenditures than adults of normal weight, with costs increasing as obesity severity increases (Cawley et al., 2021). These demographic, clinical, and economic findings support implementing a culturally appropriate, nurse-led bilingual nutrition and physical-activity intervention among low-income Hispanic adults. Changes in participants’ weight will be measured from baseline through the end of the
    **12-week intervention period**.

    **References**

    Almandoz, J. P., Xie, L., Schellinger, J. N., Mathew, M. S., Gazda, C., Ofori, A., Kuk, J. L., & Messiah, S. E. (2022). Social determinants of health and obesity: Findings from a national study of US adults.
    _Obesity, 30_(2), 491–502.
    [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/)

    Cawley, J., Biener, A., Meyerhoefer, C., Ding, Y., Zvenyach, T., Smolarz, B. G., & Ramasamy, A. (2021). Direct medical costs of obesity in the United States and the most populous states.
    _Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 27_(3), 354–366.
    [https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410](https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025).
    _Adult obesity prevalence maps_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026).
    _Fast facts: Health and economic costs of chronic conditions_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html](https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html)

    Fryar, C. D., Afful, J., & Saif, N. T. (2026).
    _Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among adults age 20 and older: United States, 1960–1962 through August 2021–August 2023_. National Center for Health Statistics.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm)

    Bottom of Form

    **## CapstonePartI.docx**

    Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

    **CAPSTONE: PART I Due 1/24/2026 by 11:59pm**

    **The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times in this course. Do not** present on the following topics:

    Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs, Pressure Ulcers, Falls, Nursing Burnout.

    1. Title Page (use appropriate title for faculty) EX: Dr. Carmen Lazo, DNP, MSN, APRN-BC, APN

    2. Introduction to your proposed problem:

    – Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

    -Introduce the topic of the paper (Abstract, Introduction). Describe the health problem.

    -Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem. What is the cost (national and local) and budget (if any) for your proposal. What is the cost nationally and locally?

    – Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. Align with the semester hours.

    3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing.

    The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. Present the PICOT in
    **APA Essay format. do not use bullet points**.

    P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C -Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

    4. Describe the vulnerable population and setting.

    -Be specific. Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

    -What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Why is change important for this population? What are the current statistics and cost? Use national and local data on your population's setting. Where are they exisiting? Ex. Miami-Dade.

    -Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.

    5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the

    problem. Do not use websites as subtitutes. At least 5 schorlary articles and if applicable schorlarly websites.

    -Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

    6. Proposal

    -Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your

    literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting.

    -Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    -Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed.

    7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project. How will this theory be incorparated into your Capstone? Discuss in details.

    – Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth.

    -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format. Write PICOT in ESSAY format.

    -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years.

    -This section should be minimum 5 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

    -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list.

    -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

    **Rubric Grading Part I.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criterion** | **Points** | **Requirements for Full Credit** |
    | **PICOT and Proposed Health Problem** | **20** | Thoroughly describe the proposed health problem and clearly explain <br>**what change is being proposed**. Support the significance of the problem with <br>**current data, statistics, and scholarly literature**. Clearly connect the problem to the PICOT question. |
    | **Description of the Population** | **20** | Provide a detailed description of the target population, including relevant <br>**age range, demographic characteristics, setting, health condition, and socioeconomic or clinical factors**. Identify important <br>**risk factors** affecting the population and support them with current scholarly evidence. |
    | **Depth of Discussion and Literature Review** | **20** | Provide an <br>**in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the entire paper**. Include a literature review from scholarly journals describing <br>**evidence-based interventions** that address the identified health problem. Integrate and synthesize information from different sources rather than discussing each source separately. The paper should flow logically from one idea to another and demonstrate a clear relationship among the problem, population, evidence, and proposed intervention. According to the rubric, the discussion should flow smoothly <br>**without unnecessary headings**. |
    | **Theoretical Nursing Framework** | **20** | Select an appropriate <br>**nursing theory, health-promotion model, disease-prevention model, or conceptual framework** that aligns with the proposed health problem. Explain the major concepts of the theory and clearly demonstrate how the framework supports the <br>**population, intervention, implementation, and expected outcomes** of the project. |
    | **Spelling, Grammar, and Required Length** | **10** | The paper should contain <br>**fewer than five grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors**. Academic and professional language should be used throughout. The paper must meet the <br>**entire required word or page count** established by the instructor. |
    | **Sources and Evidence** | **10** | Use <br>**more than five current sources**, with at least <br>**three peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books**. Include both general background evidence and specialized evidence related to the intervention. Any websites used should come from authoritative organizations such as the <br>**CDC, NIH, WHO, or professional healthcare organizations**. Citations and references should follow <br>**APA 7th edition**. |
    | **TOTAL** | **100/100** | **All Outstanding criteria must be fully addressed.** |

    **## Discussions.docx**

    **Discussion Post: PICOT Question**

    The healthcare problem I propose to change is obesity among low-income Hispanic adults. Obesity increases the risk of health problems such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, joint pain, and limited mobility. Approximately 40.3% of adults in the United States have obesity, demonstrating the seriousness of this healthcare problem (Emmerich et al., 2024).

    **PICOT question**

    In low-income Hispanic adults with obesity who receive care at a community clinic in Miami-Dade County (P), how does a nurse-led educational program about healthy nutrition and physical activity (I), compared with their initial weight before the program (C), affect weight loss (O) over 12 weeks (T)?

    The setting for this project will be a community-based primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County. The population will include Hispanic adults between 18 and 64 years of age with a body mass index of 30 kg/m² or greater. These patients may experience barriers to weight management, including limited income, lack of nutrition education, language differences, and reduced access to healthy foods or safe places for exercise.

    The proposed intervention will provide simple bilingual education about healthy eating, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Nurses are well positioned to provide health education, encouragement, psychological support, and follow-up for adults with obesity (Sen et al., 2025).

    Obesity affects patients by increasing chronic disease risk, emotional distress, physical limitations, and difficulty completing daily activities. These problems may decrease quality of life and increase healthcare visits and treatment costs. Obesity-related conditions can also contribute to hospitalizations and possible readmissions when diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease is not adequately controlled. At the community level, obesity increases the demand for primary care, emergency services, medications, and chronic disease management.

    The purpose of this quality-improvement project is to determine whether a simple, nurse-led educational program can help participants achieve measurable weight loss. Even a modest weight reduction may improve mobility, chronic disease control, and overall well-being while potentially decreasing future healthcare utilization.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Top of Form

    I plan to focus on low-income Hispanic adults receiving primary care in Hialeah, particularly within ZIP code 33012. I selected this area because it has a predominantly Hispanic population and includes patients who may experience financial, linguistic, transportation, and food-access barriers affecting weight management. Research conducted among Hispanic adults in Miami-Dade identified financial limitations, inadequate access to healthy foods, and insufficient culturally appropriate education as barriers to preventing obesity and related diseases (Martin et al., 2022).

    Current public statistics do not demonstrate that Hialeah’s overall adult obesity prevalence is higher than the national prevalence. In 2023, approximately 30.9% of Hialeah adults had obesity, with a 95% confidence interval of 26.2%–35.9% (Miami-Dade Matters, 2023). Nationally, 40.3% of adults had obesity during August 2021–August 2023 (Emmerich et al., 2024). Therefore, I cannot conclude that Hialeah’s overall population has statistically more obesity than the national population.

    Nevertheless, my project will examine a specifically selected high-risk clinical population: low-income Hispanic adults with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or greater. Before implementing the intervention, I will conduct a baseline review of deidentified clinic data to determine the number and percentage of eligible patients with obesity. This clinic-specific statistic will document the local need and provide evidence supporting the educational intervention. Participants’ baseline weights will then be compared with their weights after 12 weeks.

    **References**

    Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023.
    _NCHS Data Brief, 508_, 1–8.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm)

    Martin, M. P., Obioha, C. U., Gaikwad, S., et al. (2022). Perceptions, awareness, and barriers to care regarding obesity and diabetes among Latinx in Miami and Escambia, Florida.
    _Journal of Global Health Reports, 6_, e2022003.
    [https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.30829](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Miami-Dade Matters. (2023).
    _Adults who are obese: Hialeah_.
    [https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators](https://www.miamidadematters.org/index.php?action=view&controller=index&indicatorId=54&localeId=138831&module=indicators&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    **Nursing and Change Theories for the Capstone Project**

    The nursing theory selected for this capstone project is Pender’s Health Promotion Model. This model is appropriate because the proposed intervention focuses on helping low-income Hispanic adults adopt healthier nutrition and physical activity behaviors. The model recognizes that health behaviors are influenced by personal experiences, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, interpersonal support, and environmental factors (Alligood, 2022). These concepts are particularly relevant for patients in Hialeah ZIP code 33012 who may encounter financial limitations, language differences, transportation problems, and limited access to healthy foods.

    Pender’s model will be incorporated by assessing each participant’s perceived barriers, cultural food preferences, readiness to change, and confidence in managing weight. The nurse-led program will provide culturally appropriate bilingual education concerning portion control, affordable food choices, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals. Participants will establish individualized weekly goals and monitor their weight. Nurses will reinforce progress, address barriers, and encourage self-efficacy. This approach aligns with evidence indicating that nurses have important educational, motivational, and supportive roles in adult weight management (Sen et al., 2025).

    Lewin’s Change Theory will guide the implementation of the project through the stages of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. During the unfreezing stage, baseline clinic data will be reviewed, and participants and clinic stakeholders will receive information about obesity risks and the need for change. The changing stage will include implementation of the 12-week bilingual educational program, weekly weight monitoring, goal setting, and ongoing nursing support. During the refreezing stage, participants will receive strategies for sustaining healthier behaviors, while clinic staff will consider incorporating effective educational materials and follow-up procedures into routine practice. Lewin’s model is suitable because structured preparation, stakeholder engagement, implementation support, and reinforcement can facilitate sustainable healthcare improvements (Volpendesta et al., 2026). Together, these theories will guide both individual behavioral change and organizational adoption of the intervention.

    **References**

    Alligood, M. R. (2022).
    _Nursing theorists and their work_ (10th ed.). Elsevier.
    [https://www.elsevier.com/books/nursing-theorists-and-their-work/alligood/978-0-323-75702-7](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Volpendesta, C., Graham, N., Collins, E., & Kirchhoff, A. (2026). Transforming quality and patient experience in postpandemic nursing: A strategic collaboration between system and local leaders using Lewin’s change model.
    _Nurse Leader, 24_(1), 102574.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2025.102574](https://dmuwut6e40u5o.cloudfront.net/ultra/uiv4000.21.0-rel.64_53a3540)

    **Evidence-Based Practice and the Capstone PICOT**

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach to clinical decision-making that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise, patient preferences, and individual circumstances. In nursing, EBP is important because it supports safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care while encouraging healthcare professionals to evaluate whether current practices are producing the desired outcomes. Advanced practice nurses play an important role in identifying clinical problems, critically evaluating research findings, implementing evidence-based interventions, and measuring patient outcomes (Ylimäki et al., 2024).

    Through my review of the literature related to my PICOT question, I have discovered that obesity management requires more than simply advising patients to lose weight. Effective interventions should address nutrition, physical activity, motivation, behavioral change, cultural preferences, socioeconomic barriers, and continued follow-up. This is particularly important for low-income Hispanic adults who may experience barriers such as limited access to healthy foods, financial challenges, language differences, and limited opportunities for physical activity. Evidence supports nurses as important participants in obesity prevention and management because they can provide education, behavioral support, motivation, monitoring, and continuity of care (Sen et al., 2025). Therefore, the literature supports the use of a nurse-led bilingual educational intervention focusing on nutrition, portion control, physical activity, and realistic weight-loss goals.

    APRNs are directly involved in EBP throughout this capstone project. The APRN can identify the practice problem, formulate the PICOT question, search and critically evaluate current literature, develop the educational intervention, and monitor outcomes. APRNs can also assess participants' readiness for behavioral change, identify individual barriers, provide culturally appropriate education, and collaborate with interdisciplinary team members. Ylimäki et al. (2024) found that advanced practice nurses demonstrate important competencies in evidence transfer and implementation, emphasizing their role in translating research into clinical practice. In this capstone project, weight measurements obtained before and after the 12-week intervention will provide objective data for evaluating effectiveness. Ultimately, EBP allows the APRN to connect current scientific evidence with culturally responsive nursing interventions to improve outcomes among adults experiencing obesity.

    **References**

    Sen, A., Astin, F., Katikireddi, S. V., & Mair, F. S. (2025). The roles of nurses in preventing and managing excess weight among adults: A systematic scoping review.
    _Nursing Outlook, 73_(2), 102377.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102377)

    Ylimäki, S., Oikarinen, A., Kääriäinen, M., Tuomikoski, A.-M., et al. (2024). Advanced practice nurses’ evidence-based healthcare competence and associated factors: A systematic review.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33_.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075](https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17075)

    Current statistical evidence demonstrates the magnitude and economic burden of obesity in the United States. Approximately
    **40.3% of U.S. adults** were living with obesity during 2021–2023, demonstrating that obesity continues to represent a major public health concern (Fryar et al., 2026). Disparities are also evident among Hispanic populations. Recent CDC surveillance data indicate that Hispanic adults had an obesity prevalence of at least 35% in 33 U.S. states and territories with sufficient data, emphasizing the disproportionate burden experienced by this population (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). Socioeconomic conditions further contribute to obesity risk because cumulative social disadvantage has been associated with substantially higher prevalence of obesity, particularly more severe classes of obesity (Almandoz et al., 2022).

    The financial impact is also considerable. Obesity is estimated to cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly
    **$173 billion annually** (CDC, 2026). Additionally, research has demonstrated that adults with obesity experience significantly greater annual healthcare expenditures than adults of normal weight, with costs increasing as obesity severity increases (Cawley et al., 2021). These demographic, clinical, and economic findings support implementing a culturally appropriate, nurse-led bilingual nutrition and physical-activity intervention among low-income Hispanic adults. Changes in participants’ weight will be measured from baseline through the end of the
    **12-week intervention period**.

    **References**

    Almandoz, J. P., Xie, L., Schellinger, J. N., Mathew, M. S., Gazda, C., Ofori, A., Kuk, J. L., & Messiah, S. E. (2022). Social determinants of health and obesity: Findings from a national study of US adults.
    _Obesity, 30_(2), 491–502.
    [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088551/)

    Cawley, J., Biener, A., Meyerhoefer, C., Ding, Y., Zvenyach, T., Smolarz, B. G., & Ramasamy, A. (2021). Direct medical costs of obesity in the United States and the most populous states.
    _Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 27_(3), 354–366.
    [https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410](https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025).
    _Adult obesity prevalence maps_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html](https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html)

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026).
    _Fast facts: Health and economic costs of chronic conditions_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html](https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html)

    Fryar, C. D., Afful, J., & Saif, N. T. (2026).
    _Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among adults age 20 and older: United States, 1960–1962 through August 2021–August 2023_. National Center for Health Statistics.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/hestat111.htm)

    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] help with home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a month ago **files (1)** – ## Nu671Unit4Assignment.docx **## Nu671Unit4Assignment.docx** Nu 671 Unit 4 Assignment **Psychoanalytic Approaches & Developmental Theories** The Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice, 3rd ed. (ANA et. al, 2022), states the following three ke…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Nu671Unit4Assignment.docx

    **## Nu671Unit4Assignment.docx**

    Nu 671 Unit 4 Assignment

    **Psychoanalytic Approaches & Developmental Theories**

    The Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice, 3rd ed. (ANA et. al, 2022), states the following three key psychiatric-mental health advanced practice nursing roles in a variety of clinical settings (p. 19):

    · Provision of psychotherapy

    · Provision of psychopharmacological interventions, and

    · Provision of clinical supervision

    **Assignment Details**

    In the 1960s, Aaron Beck developed cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Since then, it has been extensively researched and found to be effective in a large number of outcome studies for psychiatric disorders, and has been demonstrated to be effective as an adjunctive treatment to medication for serious mental disorders. CBT has been adapted and studied for children, adolescents, adults, couples, and families.

    Your writing assignment should:

    · Identify the key concepts of cognitive-behavioral therapy.

    · Describe the indications for cognitive behavioral therapy.

    · Outline the structure of cognitive behavioral therapy sessions.

    · Review the clinical significance of cognitive-behavioral therapy and its efficacy in treating common psychiatric illnesses.

    **Assignment Requirements**

    Before finalizing your work, you should:

    · be sure to read the assignment description carefully (as displayed above);

    · consult the
    [**Grading Rubric**](https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=399580&type=rubric&rCode=kaplan-4016926) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and

    · utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

    Your writing assignment should:

    · be 3–5 pages in length, excluding title page, references and appendices

    · follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);

    · be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;

    · display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and

    · use APA 7th edition format.

    **## Nu671Unit4Assignment.docx**

    Nu 671 Unit 4 Assignment

    **Psychoanalytic Approaches & Developmental Theories**

    The Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice, 3rd ed. (ANA et. al, 2022), states the following three key psychiatric-mental health advanced practice nursing roles in a variety of clinical settings (p. 19):

    · Provision of psychotherapy

    · Provision of psychopharmacological interventions, and

    · Provision of clinical supervision

    **Assignment Details**

    In the 1960s, Aaron Beck developed cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Since then, it has been extensively researched and found to be effective in a large number of outcome studies for psychiatric disorders, and has been demonstrated to be effective as an adjunctive treatment to medication for serious mental disorders. CBT has been adapted and studied for children, adolescents, adults, couples, and families.

    Your writing assignment should:

    · Identify the key concepts of cognitive-behavioral therapy.

    · Describe the indications for cognitive behavioral therapy.

    · Outline the structure of cognitive behavioral therapy sessions.

    · Review the clinical significance of cognitive-behavioral therapy and its efficacy in treating common psychiatric illnesses.

    **Assignment Requirements**

    Before finalizing your work, you should:

    · be sure to read the assignment description carefully (as displayed above);

    · consult the
    [**Grading Rubric**](https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=399580&type=rubric&rCode=kaplan-4016926) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and

    · utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

    Your writing assignment should:

    · be 3–5 pages in length, excluding title page, references and appendices

    · follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);

    · be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;

    · display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and

    · use APA 7th edition format.

  • [Solved] Windshield Survey

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Create a powerpoint presentation using online information of Miami Shores, Florida zip code 33138 I have attached the template for use. Please follow the criteria for an APA-compliant PowerPoint. Please review the APA manual or Purdue Owl for assistance. **Assignment Requirements:** – The PowerPoint…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Create a powerpoint presentation using online information of Miami Shores, Florida zip code 33138

    I have attached the template for use.

    Please follow the criteria for an APA-compliant PowerPoint. Please review the APA manual or Purdue Owl for assistance.

    **Assignment Requirements:**

    – The PowerPoint is to be 11 slides provided in the template. Do not need to complete speaker notes.
    – Use bullet points (avoid overcrowding text)
    – Incorporate visuals (charts, graphs, images)
    – APA formatting for citations and references
    – Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions).

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    – [\
    \
    Module4Assignment1WindshieldSurveyTemplate.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module4assignment1windshieldsurveytemplate-pptx "Module4Assignment1WindshieldSurveyTemplate.pptx")

    – a month ago