Executive Solution Overview
– a month ago **files (1)** – ## WritingAssignmentWeek2.pdf **## WritingAssignmentWeek2.pdf** Writing Assignment Week 2 Advanced Practice Nursing: Clinical Decision-Making and Leadership Essay Overview: This assignment invites you to explore the evolution of clinical decision-making as you transitio…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– a month ago
**files (1)**
– ## WritingAssignmentWeek2.pdf
**## WritingAssignmentWeek2.pdf**
Writing Assignment Week 2
Advanced Practice Nursing: Clinical
Decision-Making and Leadership Essay
Overview: This assignment invites you to explore the evolution of clinical decision-making as you
transition from bedside nursing to advanced practice roles. In your essay, you will critically analyze and
compare the decision-making skills, leadership approaches, and ethical considerations required at the
bedside versus those required of advanced practice nurses (APNs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs)
and nurse leaders.
Your discussion must integrate the following course outcomes throughout your analysis:
• Outcome 1: Demonstrate understanding of the impact of legal and ethical issues, and healthcare
policy on decision-making in a real, complex healthcare environment.
• Outcome 2: Synthesize multidimensional approaches of decision-making learned throughout
the course to evaluate patient outcomes.
• Outcome 3: Apply thoughtful leadership approaches to implement successful changes in your
practice.
• Outcome 4: Apply multiple decision-making approaches—including transformational
leadership principles—in actual situations to demonstrate confidence in decision making.
Assignment Instructions
Writing Requirements:
• Format: Prepare your submission as an essay. The document must include a cover page, clearly
structured level headings (in adherence with APA 7th Edition standards), and a reference list.
• Length: The primary text should be a minimum of 4 pages (excluding the cover page and
references), maximum 7 pages.
• Style: Write at a graduate level using formal academic language. Your analysis should be
thorough, critical, and reflective of the course readings and other current academic literature.
• APA Guidelines: All in-text citations and the reference list must follow APA 7th Edition
guidelines.
Essay Topics and Guiding Questions
Your essay should address the following topics and questions:
Transitioning from Bedside Nursing to Advanced Practice:
• As nurses, you have all learned the importance of clinical decision-making, critical thinking, and
clinical judgment for ensuring safe and effective patient care.
• Question: As you move into your advanced practice role—whether in leadership, management,
or as an NP—how do these decision-making processes change? Does your approach need to
shift, and if so, why?
Comparing Skill Sets:
• Question: Is there a difference between the decision-making and leadership skills required by
bedside nurses compared to those needed by APNs?
• Guidance: Support your discussion with rationale drawn from the course readings and relevant
academic literature. Consider using examples from practice scenarios to highlight these
differences.
Critical Decision-Making for Future Roles:
• Question: As you transition into your role as an APN, which clinical decision-making skills are
most critical—especially for nurses planning to become NPs versus those pursuing nurse
leadership?
• Guidance: Present a rationale for your choices, referencing course readings and scholarly
research. Reflect on how multidimensional decision-making approaches can influence patient
outcomes.
Standardized Decision-Making Tools:
• Question: What standardized decision-making tool has been developed to guide nurses at all
levels in making practice decisions?
• Guidance: Explain why this tool was created, its intended purpose, and how it standardizes
decision-making across varying clinical settings.
• Question: How would you apply this tool in your current or future role as an APN? Provide
specific examples of its application in real clinical scenarios.
Additional Tools and the Consensus Model for APRNs:
• Question: Are there other standardized clinical decision-making tools available for APNs and
NPs? Evaluate whether these tools are employed consistently across care settings and offer a
rationale for their use (or limitations).
• Question: Describe the role of the Consensus Model for APRNs and discuss how it informs
decision-making processes in advanced practice settings.
Submission Requirements
• Content: Ensure all discussion questions are addressed comprehensively and supported with
both course readings and additional academic sources.
• Structure:
• Introduction: Provide an overview of your essay’s scope, the significance of the transition to an
advanced practice role, and a brief outline of what will be discussed.
• Body: Develop each question in dedicated sections with clear APA-style headings.
• Conclusion: Summarize and synthesize the main points of your discussion, highlighting the
importance of legal, ethical, and policy considerations in advanced clinical decision-making and
leadership.
• References: Include a minimum of four scholarly sources published within the past five years.
Follow APA guidelines for all citations and references.
• Formatting: Maintain APA style consistency throughout—this includes using a 12-point Times
New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and double-spaced text.
Submission Deadline: Refer to your course syllabus or assignment schedule for the specific due date.
Rubric Details
Maximum Score
100 points
Excellent
The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the
course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding
remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
30
Satisfactory
The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned
in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
24
Unsatisfactory
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied
concepts learned in the course
18
Unacceptable
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned
in the course.
12
Excellent
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement
provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is
consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence
to support the topic.
25
Satisfactory
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has
not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the
topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.
20
Unsatisfactory
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
15
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
10
Excellent
In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from
all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with APA-approved subheadings. The
author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained
from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction
and a conclusion in the submission.
25
Satisfactory
In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together
information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness- APA subheadings were
not utilized throughout the paper consistently. The author’s writing demonstrates an
understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an
introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
20
Unsatisfactory
The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s ideas excessively.
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow- the paper is not
developed at the graduate level of APA formatting- no subheadings, etc… Disjointedness is
apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship
between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the
submission, but not both.
15
Unacceptable
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It
does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate
issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding
of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.
10
Excellent
4 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources
include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and
popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are
authoritative.
7
Satisfactory
Used 3 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites
utilized are authoritative.
5.6
Unsatisfactory
Used 2 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites
utilized are credible.
4.2
Unacceptable
Fewer than 2 current sources are used which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly
books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
2.8
Excellent
Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. The paper is
developed using APA-approved headings throughout the paper.
6
Satisfactory
More than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors.
The paper is developed using an introduction APA-approved heading- but no headings within
the rest of the paper.
4.8
Unsatisfactory
More than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. APA formatting is
not developed at the graduate level.
3.6
Unacceptable
The citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is
NOT in APA Format.
2.4
Excellent
Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word
count has been met. Similarity index and AI index 20% or lower.
7
Satisfactory
More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The
required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI
index 25% or lower.
5.6
Unsatisfactory
More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word
count is 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index 30% or
lower.
4.2
Unacceptable
An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is
more than 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index above
30%.
**## WritingAssignmentWeek2.pdf**
Writing Assignment Week 2
Advanced Practice Nursing: Clinical
Decision-Making and Leadership Essay
Overview: This assignment invites you to explore the evolution of clinical decision-making as you
transition from bedside nursing to advanced practice roles. In your essay, you will critically analyze and
compare the decision-making skills, leadership approaches, and ethical considerations required at the
bedside versus those required of advanced practice nurses (APNs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs)
and nurse leaders.
Your discussion must integrate the following course outcomes throughout your analysis:
• Outcome 1: Demonstrate understanding of the impact of legal and ethical issues, and healthcare
policy on decision-making in a real, complex healthcare environment.
• Outcome 2: Synthesize multidimensional approaches of decision-making learned throughout
the course to evaluate patient outcomes.
• Outcome 3: Apply thoughtful leadership approaches to implement successful changes in your
practice.
• Outcome 4: Apply multiple decision-making approaches—including transformational
leadership principles—in actual situations to demonstrate confidence in decision making.
Assignment Instructions
Writing Requirements:
• Format: Prepare your submission as an essay. The document must include a cover page, clearly
structured level headings (in adherence with APA 7th Edition standards), and a reference list.
• Length: The primary text should be a minimum of 4 pages (excluding the cover page and
references), maximum 7 pages.
• Style: Write at a graduate level using formal academic language. Your analysis should be
thorough, critical, and reflective of the course readings and other current academic literature.
• APA Guidelines: All in-text citations and the reference list must follow APA 7th Edition
guidelines.
Essay Topics and Guiding Questions
Your essay should address the following topics and questions:
Transitioning from Bedside Nursing to Advanced Practice:
• As nurses, you have all learned the importance of clinical decision-making, critical thinking, and
clinical judgment for ensuring safe and effective patient care.
• Question: As you move into your advanced practice role—whether in leadership, management,
or as an NP—how do these decision-making processes change? Does your approach need to
shift, and if so, why?
Comparing Skill Sets:
• Question: Is there a difference between the decision-making and leadership skills required by
bedside nurses compared to those needed by APNs?
• Guidance: Support your discussion with rationale drawn from the course readings and relevant
academic literature. Consider using examples from practice scenarios to highlight these
differences.
Critical Decision-Making for Future Roles:
• Question: As you transition into your role as an APN, which clinical decision-making skills are
most critical—especially for nurses planning to become NPs versus those pursuing nurse
leadership?
• Guidance: Present a rationale for your choices, referencing course readings and scholarly
research. Reflect on how multidimensional decision-making approaches can influence patient
outcomes.
Standardized Decision-Making Tools:
• Question: What standardized decision-making tool has been developed to guide nurses at all
levels in making practice decisions?
• Guidance: Explain why this tool was created, its intended purpose, and how it standardizes
decision-making across varying clinical settings.
• Question: How would you apply this tool in your current or future role as an APN? Provide
specific examples of its application in real clinical scenarios.
Additional Tools and the Consensus Model for APRNs:
• Question: Are there other standardized clinical decision-making tools available for APNs and
NPs? Evaluate whether these tools are employed consistently across care settings and offer a
rationale for their use (or limitations).
• Question: Describe the role of the Consensus Model for APRNs and discuss how it informs
decision-making processes in advanced practice settings.
Submission Requirements
• Content: Ensure all discussion questions are addressed comprehensively and supported with
both course readings and additional academic sources.
• Structure:
• Introduction: Provide an overview of your essay’s scope, the significance of the transition to an
advanced practice role, and a brief outline of what will be discussed.
• Body: Develop each question in dedicated sections with clear APA-style headings.
• Conclusion: Summarize and synthesize the main points of your discussion, highlighting the
importance of legal, ethical, and policy considerations in advanced clinical decision-making and
leadership.
• References: Include a minimum of four scholarly sources published within the past five years.
Follow APA guidelines for all citations and references.
• Formatting: Maintain APA style consistency throughout—this includes using a 12-point Times
New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and double-spaced text.
Submission Deadline: Refer to your course syllabus or assignment schedule for the specific due date.
Rubric Details
Maximum Score
100 points
Excellent
The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the
course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding
remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
30
Satisfactory
The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned
in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
24
Unsatisfactory
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied
concepts learned in the course
18
Unacceptable
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned
in the course.
12
Excellent
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement
provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is
consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence
to support the topic.
25
Satisfactory
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has
not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the
topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.
20
Unsatisfactory
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
15
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
10
Excellent
In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from
all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with APA-approved subheadings. The
author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained
from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction
and a conclusion in the submission.
25
Satisfactory
In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together
information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness- APA subheadings were
not utilized throughout the paper consistently. The author’s writing demonstrates an
understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an
introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
20
Unsatisfactory
The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s ideas excessively.
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow- the paper is not
developed at the graduate level of APA formatting- no subheadings, etc… Disjointedness is
apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship
between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the
submission, but not both.
15
Unacceptable
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It
does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate
issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding
of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.
10
Excellent
4 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources
include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and
popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are
authoritative.
7
Satisfactory
Used 3 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites
utilized are authoritative.
5.6
Unsatisfactory
Used 2 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites
utilized are credible.
4.2
Unacceptable
Fewer than 2 current sources are used which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly
books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
2.8
Excellent
Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. The paper is
developed using APA-approved headings throughout the paper.
6
Satisfactory
More than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors.
The paper is developed using an introduction APA-approved heading- but no headings within
the rest of the paper.
4.8
Unsatisfactory
More than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. APA formatting is
not developed at the graduate level.
3.6
Unacceptable
The citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is
NOT in APA Format.
2.4
Excellent
Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word
count has been met. Similarity index and AI index 20% or lower.
7
Satisfactory
More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The
required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI
index 25% or lower.
5.6
Unsatisfactory
More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word
count is 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index 30% or
lower.
4.2
Unacceptable
An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is
more than 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index above
30%.