Executive Solution Overview
attached – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## vertionofthebook.docx – ## reserch2.docx **## vertionofthebook.docx** [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732) **## reserch2.docx** Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
attached
– 2 years ago
**files (2)**
– ## vertionofthebook.docx
– ## reserch2.docx
**## vertionofthebook.docx**
[https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)
**## reserch2.docx**
Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in relationships.
**For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose a real relationship/interaction in your life and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the relationship based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.
Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
**four** major sections: the
**Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
[Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)
[Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.
Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
**## reserch2.docx**
Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in relationships.
**For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose a real relationship/interaction in your life and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the relationship based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.
Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
**four** major sections: the
**Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
[Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)
[Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.
Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
**## vertionofthebook.docx**
[https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)
**## reserch2.docx**
Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in relationships.
**For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose a real relationship/interaction in your life and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the relationship based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.
Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
**four** major sections: the
**Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
[Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)
[Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.
Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
**## vertionofthebook.docx**
[https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)
**## reserch2.docx**
Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in relationships.
**For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose a real relationship/interaction in your life and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the relationship based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.
Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
**four** major sections: the
**Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
[Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)
[Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.
Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)
| | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
Leave a Reply