Tag: DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria & Case Formulations

  • [Solved] Review Article

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Instructions uploaded – [\ \ InstructionsforWeek3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionsforweek3-pdf "InstructionsforWeek3.pdf") – [\ \ SummaryChapter3Causality.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/summarychapter3causality-pdf "SummaryChapter3Causality.pdf")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Instructions uploaded

    – [\
    \
    InstructionsforWeek3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionsforweek3-pdf "InstructionsforWeek3.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SummaryChapter3Causality.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/summarychapter3causality-pdf "SummaryChapter3Causality.pdf")

  • [Solved] Psychology Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## LibraryAssignment232-Fall202628Student29.docx – ResearcherInstructions-FitnessInfluencerHalo.docx **## LibraryAssignment232-Fall202628Student29.docx** ## Library Assignment Instructions – This is graded for accuracy! – 5 points! _NOTE: Make sure to upload your answers to the quest…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## LibraryAssignment232-Fall202628Student29.docx

    – ResearcherInstructions-FitnessInfluencerHalo.docx

    **## LibraryAssignment232-Fall202628Student29.docx**

    ## Library Assignment Instructions – This is graded for accuracy! – 5 points!

    _NOTE: Make sure to upload your answers to the questions on this sheet in Canvas!_

    Some general rules for doing library research include:

    1. Library content is continually changing, similar to Google. A Google search one day gets a certain number of results and the next day the number changes. Libraries also update and improve access to their content, so what works today may not necessarily work next year. Also, procedures may differ slightly depending on how you access the library's computer databases (e.g., a connection from home versus a dedicated terminal in the library).

    2. There are often several ways of locating the same information. This assignment directs you to several resources in order to familiarize you with their existence, but it is not the only way! If you find yourself getting stuck when using one resource—and you are able to locate the information a different way—feel free to do so.

    3. This assignment will not cover all of the useful library resources available to you, and the undergraduate psychology librarians will show you an even broader array of options. For now, go to the FIU library website at
    [http://library.fiu.edu/](http://library.fiu.edu/) to get started.

    **STEP 1:** **PsycINFO**:

    PsycINFO is the #1 database in psychology. It is an online source for finding articles in psychology journals. Go to the library website,
    [library.fiu.edu](http://library.fiu.edu/), and click Research: Start. You can find PsycINFO in several ways including:

    1. Go to library.fiu.edu and click Research: Start. Click Subject Resources. Click
    [PSY3213/3215: Research Methods](https://library.fiu.edu/PSY3213).

    2. Go directly to the Library Research Guide created for this course called
    [PSY3213/3215: Research Methods](https://library.fiu.edu/PSY3213) at
    [library.fiu.edu/psy3215](http://library.fiu.edu/psy3215).

    3. Go to library.fiu.edu and click Research: Start. Click Subject Resources, followed by Psychology. Click the Databases tab on the Psychology page.

    4. Click A-Z Databases from the Research: Start page. Find PsycInfo (this is what I usually do!)

    There are several features in PsycINFO to help you with finding articles associated with your study. You can do a Basic Search, an Advanced Search, or browse on your own. Using Advanced Search allows you to limit your search to articles that are the most relevant, provided you have a keyword, author name, journal title, or article title already in mind.

    There are numerous ways to limit your search results including:

    1. to a specific range of years

    2. to specific languages, methodologies, age ranges, etc.

    3. to peer reviewed articles (for primary sources, which are
    **required for Paper 1**).

    You can also search PsycINFO for multiple items, which may include a combination of an author’s name, journal title, or a keyword in the title or abstract of a specific article, etc. For example, to search for articles by a specific author, type in the author's last name followed by the first name (and middle initial, if you know it) in the first empty search box. In the drop-down box to the right of the search boxes, select AUTHOR(AU). If you type in “Loftus Elizabeth” and choose
    **author**, your search will find 437 articles that include her name as an author (wow, right! What a prolific writer!)

    You can follow a similar procedure to locate articles by subject, title, or keyword. For example, try using the word "
    **eyewitness**" as a search term in the
    **document** **title**. When I did this a month ago, the results returned 1873 publications (which might have gone up since I last looked!). That is WAAAAY too many to look through! Of course, if you do only peer reviewed article, this drops a lot (but still has 1384 articles with eyewitness in the title!).

    When you get results numbering in the thousands, you will want to narrow down your search. You can do this by entering different search terms or combining results from searches you have already completed. Every time you do a search, the results are saved in your "recent searches." You can combine articles in the search history to narrow down your list of articles to your specifications.

    Let's say you want a list of all articles authored by Elizabeth Loftus with the word "eyewitness" in the title. You have already run searches on
    _Loftus_ _Elizabeth_ as an author and
    _eyewitness_ in the title. Click on the Recent Searches link at the top of the page and you will see those previous searches listed. In the Combine Searches box, type “search #1 and search #2” and hit enter. Elizabeth Loftus’s publications regarding eyewitnesses will be shown. When I did this, it produced only 46 articles including Loftus as an author and eyewitness as a word in the title. If I look at Loftus, Eyewitness, and Peer Reviewed, this search drops to 29. This is MUCH more manageable.

    ![fiu green library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/psychology-assignment-2-20983425)

    Using PsycINFO, answer the following questions.

    Question One
    _(.5 points)_: Using PsycINFO, locate an article authored by Fabian T. C. Schmidt and colleagues focusing on autonomy and reactance. Use “Fabian Schmidt” as an
    **author** term and one or two of the following terms in the
    **document** **title**: “halo”, and/or “grading” (You can look at more than one title keyword by clicking “Add a row” to allow for a third item). Select the
    correct, full, and correct APA-style reference\* for this article on your assignment sheet. Note that the DOI is needed for APA references, so make sure to include it!

    A

    Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2023). Halo Effects in Grading: An Experimental Approach.
    _Educational psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    B

    Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach (2023). Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J.
    _Educational Psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    C

    Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2023). Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach.
    _Educational Psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    D

    Schmidt, Fabian T. C., Kaiser, Aurelia, & Retelsdorf, Jan (2023).
    _Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach._ Educational Psychology, 43 (2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    *For correct APA reference format, refer to the end of this library assignment document as well as the APA formatting PowerPoint presentation in Canvas

    Question Two
    _(.5 points)._ Recall the Schmidt et al. article from Question One above (“Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach.”). In the last paragraph on page 252, the authors discussed four “assessments” provided to participants regarding the student they were about to grade. Which of the following is NOT one of the assessments included in the vignettes that participants read?

    A. Academic achievement of the student to be graded.

    B. Social behavior of the student to be graded.

    C. Academic behavior of the student to be graded.

    D. Physical attractiveness of the student to be graded.

    Question Three
    _(.5 points)_.
    In 2023, Shengnan Ren, Sahar Karimi, Alberto Bravo Velazquez, and Jianfeng Cai published an article with the title “Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth”, which looks at the impact of different kinds of social media influencers (entertainment vs. informers). Find the full-text article and then choose the correct APA formatted reference from those listed below.

    A

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., and Cai, J. (2023).
    _Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth._ Journal of business research, 156, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    B

    Shengnan Ren, Sahar Karimi, Alberto Bravo Velazquez, and Jianfeng Cai (2023). Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    C

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., & Cai, J. (2023). Endorsement Effectiveness of Different Social Media Influencers: The Moderating Effect of Brand Competence and Warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    D

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., & Cai, J. (2023). Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    Question Four
    _(.5 points)._ Consider the same Li and Shen journal article from Question Three above (“Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.”). In their literature review section, they discuss six hypotheses. Which of the following is a correct restatement of one of those six hypotheses?

    A. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to attract a greater number of views than endorsements by informer influencers.

    B. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to receive a greater number of likes than endorsements by informer influencers.

    C. Endorsements by informer influencers are less likely to generate more online sales than entertainer influencers, when endorsing competent brands.

    D. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are more likely to receive a greater number of comments than endorsements by informer influencers.

    E. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to generate more online sales than informer influencers, when endorsing warm brands.

    Question Five
    _(.5 points)_: Using PsycINFO, locate one article relevant to your Paper I: Study One Literature Review that is different from the articles in the questions above
    and different than any of the articles posted on Canvas for your Paper I: Study One Literature Review. This article
    must be a primary source (peer reviewed), reporting on original, empirical research (I do not want reviews of the field or books at this time). To find articles that look interesting, enter key words focused on the topic of your study (e.g., Halo Effect; Horns Effect; Reverse Halo Effect, Indirect Associations, Persuasion, Influencers, Social Media, etc.) There are tons of keywords for this topic – note that some of the articles in PsycInfo even list the keywords that they used for their paper). Using APA format, enter the reference on your answer sheet (Since Canvas may not allow for proper indenting or spacing, we will not mark off for that, but make sure the rest of your citation is in APA format):

    Using APA format, write the reference in Canvas (Since Canvas may not allow for proper indenting or spacing, we will not mark off for that, but make sure the rest of your citation is in APA format).

    _Note: Make sure you examine the full list of articles PsycINFO provides. You will use that list again for Question Nine when comparing your PsycINFO search to your AI search in Step 2._

    **STEP 2: Using AI**

    With artificial intelligence (AI) becoming a widespread and useful tool for researchers, I want you to use it for your research this semester. For the questions below, use your preferred AI program. There are no restrictions regarding which AI tool you use (ChatGPT, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini, etc.), though feel free to use
    [https://chat.openai.com/](https://chat.openai.com/) or copilot.microsoft.com if you are unfamiliar with AI tools.

    Question Six
    _(.5 points)_: Using your preferred AI tool, enter the prompt below to generate five empirical references related to your study topic this semester. Copy / paste all five references into the Canvas answer box for Question Six. For this question, your five references DO NOT need to be in APA format. However, they do need to come from peer-reviewed journals.

    I am a psychology student writing a literature review paper for a study on the Halo Effect with one independent variable with three levels that focuses on how participants make decisions about a social media influencer and his sponsor when the influencer acts in a positive, negative, or control manner. The independent variable differs in terms of the influencer response in a bullying scenario. In the positive condition, participants read about a social media influencer who behaves in a negative manner (joining in and mocking a victim of bullying). In the negative condition, participants read about a social media influencer who behaves in a positive manner (assisting and encouraging the victim of bullying). In the control condition, the social media influencer appears to not notice the bullying situation. The dependent variables ask participant to rate the influencer on several dimensions (how compassionate, honest, qualified, trustworthy the influencer is) as well as rating a company that sponsors the influencer. We want to determine of the behavior of the influencer has an indirect impact on ratings about his sponsor. Provide five references from peer-reviewed journals that address this topic that might be used to write a literature review. The references must provide the author’s names, article title, date of publication, and journal name.

    Question Seven (.5 points): Choose ONE of the five articles that AI generated in Question Six (select one that you feel is most relevant to your semester project) and ask AI to give you a one paragraph summary of that article that highlights the main independent and dependent variables for the study. Copy / paste that summary into Canvas.

    Question Eight (.5 points): For the article you chose for Question Seven, evaluate it for accuracy and relevancy as well as for potential “AI hallucinations.” Address
    at least one of the following questions in two to three sentences: 1). Was the reference real or an AI hallucination? How can you tell? 2). Was the reference scholarly, empirical, and/or peer-reviewed? How can you tell? 3). Do you think the summary from AI was factual? How can you tell? 4). Is there any way for you to know where the information originally came from? How would you try to find it?

    Note: Be careful with AI “Hallucinations” as AI may give you a fake resource. For example, when preparing these library instructions, AI gave me a fake reference by Rafikoya & Voromin (2025). When I asked AI to summarize the article, AI told me: “It appears there is no record of a study by Rafikova & Voromin (2025) in the APA PsycINFO database. The earlier mention of that study was likely a placeholder or fictional reference.” So, double-check any response generated by AI as we will deduct points from YOUR grade if you submit AI generated hallucinations.

    **Step 3: Comparing AI and PsycINFO**

    Question Nine (.5 points): Look over the articles provided by your PsycINFO search and compare them to the results from AI. How do the results from AI and PsycINFO differ? How are they similar? Which results do you trust and why? What are some things to look for when searching for peer-reviewed empirical studies? Write two or three sentences.

    **Step 4: Your Semester Study**

    Question Ten
    _(.5 points)__:_ Give me your study predictions (for your Halo Effect study). Yes, this is an easy question! All you must do is copy and paste your study one predictions (and no, you do
    not need to write your own predictions for study one). You can find these predictions in your Assignment #4 (Study One Materials) Research Instructions. You can find the same predictions in the lab PowerPoint presentations (Labs 1, 2, and 3). You can even find them in the Paper One instructions. Find them, copy them, paste them (and make sure to use them in Paper One as you write that paper). In other words, for Question Ten, simply paste your predictions into the Canvas question ten box so I know that you know what your predictions are! I’ll even get you started!

    “We have several predictions in this study. First, …

    *APA Reference Examples

    a.
    **_Article Example_**:
    **The following is the most common type of APA reference for an article by two or more authors.**

    Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Periodical, volume number (issue number if present), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy

    Wiener, R. L., Winter, R., Rogers, M., & Arnot, L. (2004). The effects of prior workplace behavior on subsequent sexual harassment judgments.
    _Law and Human Behavior, 28_(1), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org /10.1023/B:LAHU.0000015003.72223.63

    b.
    **_Book Example_**:
    **The following is the most common type of APA reference for an article by two or more authors.**

    Author, A. A. (Year of publication).
    _Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle._ Publisher Name.

    Stoneman, R. (2008).
    _Alexander the Great: A life in legend._ Yale University Press.

    Bordens, K.S. & Abbott, B.B. (2008).
    _Research design and methods: A process approach_. (7th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    For a good resource for references, go to:

    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_articles_in_periodicals.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_articles_in_periodicals.html)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **ResearcherInstructions-FitnessInfluencerHalo.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researcherinstructions-fitnessinfluencerhalo-docx)

    **ResearcherInstructions-FitnessInfluencerHalo.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researcherinstructions-fitnessinfluencerhalo-docx)

    **## LibraryAssignment232-Fall202628Student29.docx**

    ## Library Assignment Instructions – This is graded for accuracy! – 5 points!

    _NOTE: Make sure to upload your answers to the questions on this sheet in Canvas!_

    Some general rules for doing library research include:

    1. Library content is continually changing, similar to Google. A Google search one day gets a certain number of results and the next day the number changes. Libraries also update and improve access to their content, so what works today may not necessarily work next year. Also, procedures may differ slightly depending on how you access the library's computer databases (e.g., a connection from home versus a dedicated terminal in the library).

    2. There are often several ways of locating the same information. This assignment directs you to several resources in order to familiarize you with their existence, but it is not the only way! If you find yourself getting stuck when using one resource—and you are able to locate the information a different way—feel free to do so.

    3. This assignment will not cover all of the useful library resources available to you, and the undergraduate psychology librarians will show you an even broader array of options. For now, go to the FIU library website at
    [http://library.fiu.edu/](http://library.fiu.edu/) to get started.

    **STEP 1:** **PsycINFO**:

    PsycINFO is the #1 database in psychology. It is an online source for finding articles in psychology journals. Go to the library website,
    [library.fiu.edu](http://library.fiu.edu/), and click Research: Start. You can find PsycINFO in several ways including:

    1. Go to library.fiu.edu and click Research: Start. Click Subject Resources. Click
    [PSY3213/3215: Research Methods](https://library.fiu.edu/PSY3213).

    2. Go directly to the Library Research Guide created for this course called
    [PSY3213/3215: Research Methods](https://library.fiu.edu/PSY3213) at
    [library.fiu.edu/psy3215](http://library.fiu.edu/psy3215).

    3. Go to library.fiu.edu and click Research: Start. Click Subject Resources, followed by Psychology. Click the Databases tab on the Psychology page.

    4. Click A-Z Databases from the Research: Start page. Find PsycInfo (this is what I usually do!)

    There are several features in PsycINFO to help you with finding articles associated with your study. You can do a Basic Search, an Advanced Search, or browse on your own. Using Advanced Search allows you to limit your search to articles that are the most relevant, provided you have a keyword, author name, journal title, or article title already in mind.

    There are numerous ways to limit your search results including:

    1. to a specific range of years

    2. to specific languages, methodologies, age ranges, etc.

    3. to peer reviewed articles (for primary sources, which are
    **required for Paper 1**).

    You can also search PsycINFO for multiple items, which may include a combination of an author’s name, journal title, or a keyword in the title or abstract of a specific article, etc. For example, to search for articles by a specific author, type in the author's last name followed by the first name (and middle initial, if you know it) in the first empty search box. In the drop-down box to the right of the search boxes, select AUTHOR(AU). If you type in “Loftus Elizabeth” and choose
    **author**, your search will find 437 articles that include her name as an author (wow, right! What a prolific writer!)

    You can follow a similar procedure to locate articles by subject, title, or keyword. For example, try using the word "
    **eyewitness**" as a search term in the
    **document** **title**. When I did this a month ago, the results returned 1873 publications (which might have gone up since I last looked!). That is WAAAAY too many to look through! Of course, if you do only peer reviewed article, this drops a lot (but still has 1384 articles with eyewitness in the title!).

    When you get results numbering in the thousands, you will want to narrow down your search. You can do this by entering different search terms or combining results from searches you have already completed. Every time you do a search, the results are saved in your "recent searches." You can combine articles in the search history to narrow down your list of articles to your specifications.

    Let's say you want a list of all articles authored by Elizabeth Loftus with the word "eyewitness" in the title. You have already run searches on
    _Loftus_ _Elizabeth_ as an author and
    _eyewitness_ in the title. Click on the Recent Searches link at the top of the page and you will see those previous searches listed. In the Combine Searches box, type “search #1 and search #2” and hit enter. Elizabeth Loftus’s publications regarding eyewitnesses will be shown. When I did this, it produced only 46 articles including Loftus as an author and eyewitness as a word in the title. If I look at Loftus, Eyewitness, and Peer Reviewed, this search drops to 29. This is MUCH more manageable.

    ![fiu green library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/psychology-assignment-2-20983425)

    Using PsycINFO, answer the following questions.

    Question One
    _(.5 points)_: Using PsycINFO, locate an article authored by Fabian T. C. Schmidt and colleagues focusing on autonomy and reactance. Use “Fabian Schmidt” as an
    **author** term and one or two of the following terms in the
    **document** **title**: “halo”, and/or “grading” (You can look at more than one title keyword by clicking “Add a row” to allow for a third item). Select the
    correct, full, and correct APA-style reference\* for this article on your assignment sheet. Note that the DOI is needed for APA references, so make sure to include it!

    A

    Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2023). Halo Effects in Grading: An Experimental Approach.
    _Educational psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    B

    Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach (2023). Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J.
    _Educational Psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    C

    Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2023). Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach.
    _Educational Psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    D

    Schmidt, Fabian T. C., Kaiser, Aurelia, & Retelsdorf, Jan (2023).
    _Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach._ Educational Psychology, 43 (2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    *For correct APA reference format, refer to the end of this library assignment document as well as the APA formatting PowerPoint presentation in Canvas

    Question Two
    _(.5 points)._ Recall the Schmidt et al. article from Question One above (“Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach.”). In the last paragraph on page 252, the authors discussed four “assessments” provided to participants regarding the student they were about to grade. Which of the following is NOT one of the assessments included in the vignettes that participants read?

    A. Academic achievement of the student to be graded.

    B. Social behavior of the student to be graded.

    C. Academic behavior of the student to be graded.

    D. Physical attractiveness of the student to be graded.

    Question Three
    _(.5 points)_.
    In 2023, Shengnan Ren, Sahar Karimi, Alberto Bravo Velazquez, and Jianfeng Cai published an article with the title “Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth”, which looks at the impact of different kinds of social media influencers (entertainment vs. informers). Find the full-text article and then choose the correct APA formatted reference from those listed below.

    A

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., and Cai, J. (2023).
    _Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth._ Journal of business research, 156, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    B

    Shengnan Ren, Sahar Karimi, Alberto Bravo Velazquez, and Jianfeng Cai (2023). Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    C

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., & Cai, J. (2023). Endorsement Effectiveness of Different Social Media Influencers: The Moderating Effect of Brand Competence and Warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    D

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., & Cai, J. (2023). Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    Question Four
    _(.5 points)._ Consider the same Li and Shen journal article from Question Three above (“Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.”). In their literature review section, they discuss six hypotheses. Which of the following is a correct restatement of one of those six hypotheses?

    A. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to attract a greater number of views than endorsements by informer influencers.

    B. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to receive a greater number of likes than endorsements by informer influencers.

    C. Endorsements by informer influencers are less likely to generate more online sales than entertainer influencers, when endorsing competent brands.

    D. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are more likely to receive a greater number of comments than endorsements by informer influencers.

    E. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to generate more online sales than informer influencers, when endorsing warm brands.

    Question Five
    _(.5 points)_: Using PsycINFO, locate one article relevant to your Paper I: Study One Literature Review that is different from the articles in the questions above
    and different than any of the articles posted on Canvas for your Paper I: Study One Literature Review. This article
    must be a primary source (peer reviewed), reporting on original, empirical research (I do not want reviews of the field or books at this time). To find articles that look interesting, enter key words focused on the topic of your study (e.g., Halo Effect; Horns Effect; Reverse Halo Effect, Indirect Associations, Persuasion, Influencers, Social Media, etc.) There are tons of keywords for this topic – note that some of the articles in PsycInfo even list the keywords that they used for their paper). Using APA format, enter the reference on your answer sheet (Since Canvas may not allow for proper indenting or spacing, we will not mark off for that, but make sure the rest of your citation is in APA format):

    Using APA format, write the reference in Canvas (Since Canvas may not allow for proper indenting or spacing, we will not mark off for that, but make sure the rest of your citation is in APA format).

    _Note: Make sure you examine the full list of articles PsycINFO provides. You will use that list again for Question Nine when comparing your PsycINFO search to your AI search in Step 2._

    **STEP 2: Using AI**

    With artificial intelligence (AI) becoming a widespread and useful tool for researchers, I want you to use it for your research this semester. For the questions below, use your preferred AI program. There are no restrictions regarding which AI tool you use (ChatGPT, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini, etc.), though feel free to use
    [https://chat.openai.com/](https://chat.openai.com/) or copilot.microsoft.com if you are unfamiliar with AI tools.

    Question Six
    _(.5 points)_: Using your preferred AI tool, enter the prompt below to generate five empirical references related to your study topic this semester. Copy / paste all five references into the Canvas answer box for Question Six. For this question, your five references DO NOT need to be in APA format. However, they do need to come from peer-reviewed journals.

    I am a psychology student writing a literature review paper for a study on the Halo Effect with one independent variable with three levels that focuses on how participants make decisions about a social media influencer and his sponsor when the influencer acts in a positive, negative, or control manner. The independent variable differs in terms of the influencer response in a bullying scenario. In the positive condition, participants read about a social media influencer who behaves in a negative manner (joining in and mocking a victim of bullying). In the negative condition, participants read about a social media influencer who behaves in a positive manner (assisting and encouraging the victim of bullying). In the control condition, the social media influencer appears to not notice the bullying situation. The dependent variables ask participant to rate the influencer on several dimensions (how compassionate, honest, qualified, trustworthy the influencer is) as well as rating a company that sponsors the influencer. We want to determine of the behavior of the influencer has an indirect impact on ratings about his sponsor. Provide five references from peer-reviewed journals that address this topic that might be used to write a literature review. The references must provide the author’s names, article title, date of publication, and journal name.

    Question Seven (.5 points): Choose ONE of the five articles that AI generated in Question Six (select one that you feel is most relevant to your semester project) and ask AI to give you a one paragraph summary of that article that highlights the main independent and dependent variables for the study. Copy / paste that summary into Canvas.

    Question Eight (.5 points): For the article you chose for Question Seven, evaluate it for accuracy and relevancy as well as for potential “AI hallucinations.” Address
    at least one of the following questions in two to three sentences: 1). Was the reference real or an AI hallucination? How can you tell? 2). Was the reference scholarly, empirical, and/or peer-reviewed? How can you tell? 3). Do you think the summary from AI was factual? How can you tell? 4). Is there any way for you to know where the information originally came from? How would you try to find it?

    Note: Be careful with AI “Hallucinations” as AI may give you a fake resource. For example, when preparing these library instructions, AI gave me a fake reference by Rafikoya & Voromin (2025). When I asked AI to summarize the article, AI told me: “It appears there is no record of a study by Rafikova & Voromin (2025) in the APA PsycINFO database. The earlier mention of that study was likely a placeholder or fictional reference.” So, double-check any response generated by AI as we will deduct points from YOUR grade if you submit AI generated hallucinations.

    **Step 3: Comparing AI and PsycINFO**

    Question Nine (.5 points): Look over the articles provided by your PsycINFO search and compare them to the results from AI. How do the results from AI and PsycINFO differ? How are they similar? Which results do you trust and why? What are some things to look for when searching for peer-reviewed empirical studies? Write two or three sentences.

    **Step 4: Your Semester Study**

    Question Ten
    _(.5 points)__:_ Give me your study predictions (for your Halo Effect study). Yes, this is an easy question! All you must do is copy and paste your study one predictions (and no, you do
    not need to write your own predictions for study one). You can find these predictions in your Assignment #4 (Study One Materials) Research Instructions. You can find the same predictions in the lab PowerPoint presentations (Labs 1, 2, and 3). You can even find them in the Paper One instructions. Find them, copy them, paste them (and make sure to use them in Paper One as you write that paper). In other words, for Question Ten, simply paste your predictions into the Canvas question ten box so I know that you know what your predictions are! I’ll even get you started!

    “We have several predictions in this study. First, …

    *APA Reference Examples

    a.
    **_Article Example_**:
    **The following is the most common type of APA reference for an article by two or more authors.**

    Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Periodical, volume number (issue number if present), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy

    Wiener, R. L., Winter, R., Rogers, M., & Arnot, L. (2004). The effects of prior workplace behavior on subsequent sexual harassment judgments.
    _Law and Human Behavior, 28_(1), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org /10.1023/B:LAHU.0000015003.72223.63

    b.
    **_Book Example_**:
    **The following is the most common type of APA reference for an article by two or more authors.**

    Author, A. A. (Year of publication).
    _Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle._ Publisher Name.

    Stoneman, R. (2008).
    _Alexander the Great: A life in legend._ Yale University Press.

    Bordens, K.S. & Abbott, B.B. (2008).
    _Research design and methods: A process approach_. (7th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    For a good resource for references, go to:

    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_articles_in_periodicals.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_articles_in_periodicals.html)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **ResearcherInstructions-FitnessInfluencerHalo.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researcherinstructions-fitnessinfluencerhalo-docx)

    **## LibraryAssignment232-Fall202628Student29.docx**

    ## Library Assignment Instructions – This is graded for accuracy! – 5 points!

    _NOTE: Make sure to upload your answers to the questions on this sheet in Canvas!_

    Some general rules for doing library research include:

    1. Library content is continually changing, similar to Google. A Google search one day gets a certain number of results and the next day the number changes. Libraries also update and improve access to their content, so what works today may not necessarily work next year. Also, procedures may differ slightly depending on how you access the library's computer databases (e.g., a connection from home versus a dedicated terminal in the library).

    2. There are often several ways of locating the same information. This assignment directs you to several resources in order to familiarize you with their existence, but it is not the only way! If you find yourself getting stuck when using one resource—and you are able to locate the information a different way—feel free to do so.

    3. This assignment will not cover all of the useful library resources available to you, and the undergraduate psychology librarians will show you an even broader array of options. For now, go to the FIU library website at
    [http://library.fiu.edu/](http://library.fiu.edu/) to get started.

    **STEP 1:** **PsycINFO**:

    PsycINFO is the #1 database in psychology. It is an online source for finding articles in psychology journals. Go to the library website,
    [library.fiu.edu](http://library.fiu.edu/), and click Research: Start. You can find PsycINFO in several ways including:

    1. Go to library.fiu.edu and click Research: Start. Click Subject Resources. Click
    [PSY3213/3215: Research Methods](https://library.fiu.edu/PSY3213).

    2. Go directly to the Library Research Guide created for this course called
    [PSY3213/3215: Research Methods](https://library.fiu.edu/PSY3213) at
    [library.fiu.edu/psy3215](http://library.fiu.edu/psy3215).

    3. Go to library.fiu.edu and click Research: Start. Click Subject Resources, followed by Psychology. Click the Databases tab on the Psychology page.

    4. Click A-Z Databases from the Research: Start page. Find PsycInfo (this is what I usually do!)

    There are several features in PsycINFO to help you with finding articles associated with your study. You can do a Basic Search, an Advanced Search, or browse on your own. Using Advanced Search allows you to limit your search to articles that are the most relevant, provided you have a keyword, author name, journal title, or article title already in mind.

    There are numerous ways to limit your search results including:

    1. to a specific range of years

    2. to specific languages, methodologies, age ranges, etc.

    3. to peer reviewed articles (for primary sources, which are
    **required for Paper 1**).

    You can also search PsycINFO for multiple items, which may include a combination of an author’s name, journal title, or a keyword in the title or abstract of a specific article, etc. For example, to search for articles by a specific author, type in the author's last name followed by the first name (and middle initial, if you know it) in the first empty search box. In the drop-down box to the right of the search boxes, select AUTHOR(AU). If you type in “Loftus Elizabeth” and choose
    **author**, your search will find 437 articles that include her name as an author (wow, right! What a prolific writer!)

    You can follow a similar procedure to locate articles by subject, title, or keyword. For example, try using the word "
    **eyewitness**" as a search term in the
    **document** **title**. When I did this a month ago, the results returned 1873 publications (which might have gone up since I last looked!). That is WAAAAY too many to look through! Of course, if you do only peer reviewed article, this drops a lot (but still has 1384 articles with eyewitness in the title!).

    When you get results numbering in the thousands, you will want to narrow down your search. You can do this by entering different search terms or combining results from searches you have already completed. Every time you do a search, the results are saved in your "recent searches." You can combine articles in the search history to narrow down your list of articles to your specifications.

    Let's say you want a list of all articles authored by Elizabeth Loftus with the word "eyewitness" in the title. You have already run searches on
    _Loftus_ _Elizabeth_ as an author and
    _eyewitness_ in the title. Click on the Recent Searches link at the top of the page and you will see those previous searches listed. In the Combine Searches box, type “search #1 and search #2” and hit enter. Elizabeth Loftus’s publications regarding eyewitnesses will be shown. When I did this, it produced only 46 articles including Loftus as an author and eyewitness as a word in the title. If I look at Loftus, Eyewitness, and Peer Reviewed, this search drops to 29. This is MUCH more manageable.

    ![fiu green library](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/psychology-assignment-2-20983425)

    Using PsycINFO, answer the following questions.

    Question One
    _(.5 points)_: Using PsycINFO, locate an article authored by Fabian T. C. Schmidt and colleagues focusing on autonomy and reactance. Use “Fabian Schmidt” as an
    **author** term and one or two of the following terms in the
    **document** **title**: “halo”, and/or “grading” (You can look at more than one title keyword by clicking “Add a row” to allow for a third item). Select the
    correct, full, and correct APA-style reference\* for this article on your assignment sheet. Note that the DOI is needed for APA references, so make sure to include it!

    A

    Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2023). Halo Effects in Grading: An Experimental Approach.
    _Educational psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    B

    Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach (2023). Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J.
    _Educational Psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    C

    Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2023). Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach.
    _Educational Psychology,43_(2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    D

    Schmidt, Fabian T. C., Kaiser, Aurelia, & Retelsdorf, Jan (2023).
    _Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach._ Educational Psychology, 43 (2-3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593

    *For correct APA reference format, refer to the end of this library assignment document as well as the APA formatting PowerPoint presentation in Canvas

    Question Two
    _(.5 points)._ Recall the Schmidt et al. article from Question One above (“Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach.”). In the last paragraph on page 252, the authors discussed four “assessments” provided to participants regarding the student they were about to grade. Which of the following is NOT one of the assessments included in the vignettes that participants read?

    A. Academic achievement of the student to be graded.

    B. Social behavior of the student to be graded.

    C. Academic behavior of the student to be graded.

    D. Physical attractiveness of the student to be graded.

    Question Three
    _(.5 points)_.
    In 2023, Shengnan Ren, Sahar Karimi, Alberto Bravo Velazquez, and Jianfeng Cai published an article with the title “Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth”, which looks at the impact of different kinds of social media influencers (entertainment vs. informers). Find the full-text article and then choose the correct APA formatted reference from those listed below.

    A

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., and Cai, J. (2023).
    _Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth._ Journal of business research, 156, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    B

    Shengnan Ren, Sahar Karimi, Alberto Bravo Velazquez, and Jianfeng Cai (2023). Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    C

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., & Cai, J. (2023). Endorsement Effectiveness of Different Social Media Influencers: The Moderating Effect of Brand Competence and Warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    D

    Ren, S., Karimi, S., Bravo Velázquez, A., & Cai, J. (2023). Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.
    _Journal of Business Research, 156_, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476

    Question Four
    _(.5 points)._ Consider the same Li and Shen journal article from Question Three above (“Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth.”). In their literature review section, they discuss six hypotheses. Which of the following is a correct restatement of one of those six hypotheses?

    A. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to attract a greater number of views than endorsements by informer influencers.

    B. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to receive a greater number of likes than endorsements by informer influencers.

    C. Endorsements by informer influencers are less likely to generate more online sales than entertainer influencers, when endorsing competent brands.

    D. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are more likely to receive a greater number of comments than endorsements by informer influencers.

    E. Endorsements by entertainer influencers are less likely to generate more online sales than informer influencers, when endorsing warm brands.

    Question Five
    _(.5 points)_: Using PsycINFO, locate one article relevant to your Paper I: Study One Literature Review that is different from the articles in the questions above
    and different than any of the articles posted on Canvas for your Paper I: Study One Literature Review. This article
    must be a primary source (peer reviewed), reporting on original, empirical research (I do not want reviews of the field or books at this time). To find articles that look interesting, enter key words focused on the topic of your study (e.g., Halo Effect; Horns Effect; Reverse Halo Effect, Indirect Associations, Persuasion, Influencers, Social Media, etc.) There are tons of keywords for this topic – note that some of the articles in PsycInfo even list the keywords that they used for their paper). Using APA format, enter the reference on your answer sheet (Since Canvas may not allow for proper indenting or spacing, we will not mark off for that, but make sure the rest of your citation is in APA format):

    Using APA format, write the reference in Canvas (Since Canvas may not allow for proper indenting or spacing, we will not mark off for that, but make sure the rest of your citation is in APA format).

    _Note: Make sure you examine the full list of articles PsycINFO provides. You will use that list again for Question Nine when comparing your PsycINFO search to your AI search in Step 2._

    **STEP 2: Using AI**

    With artificial intelligence (AI) becoming a widespread and useful tool for researchers, I want you to use it for your research this semester. For the questions below, use your preferred AI program. There are no restrictions regarding which AI tool you use (ChatGPT, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini, etc.), though feel free to use
    [https://chat.openai.com/](https://chat.openai.com/) or copilot.microsoft.com if you are unfamiliar with AI tools.

    Question Six
    _(.5 points)_: Using your preferred AI tool, enter the prompt below to generate five empirical references related to your study topic this semester. Copy / paste all five references into the Canvas answer box for Question Six. For this question, your five references DO NOT need to be in APA format. However, they do need to come from peer-reviewed journals.

    I am a psychology student writing a literature review paper for a study on the Halo Effect with one independent variable with three levels that focuses on how participants make decisions about a social media influencer and his sponsor when the influencer acts in a positive, negative, or control manner. The independent variable differs in terms of the influencer response in a bullying scenario. In the positive condition, participants read about a social media influencer who behaves in a negative manner (joining in and mocking a victim of bullying). In the negative condition, participants read about a social media influencer who behaves in a positive manner (assisting and encouraging the victim of bullying). In the control condition, the social media influencer appears to not notice the bullying situation. The dependent variables ask participant to rate the influencer on several dimensions (how compassionate, honest, qualified, trustworthy the influencer is) as well as rating a company that sponsors the influencer. We want to determine of the behavior of the influencer has an indirect impact on ratings about his sponsor. Provide five references from peer-reviewed journals that address this topic that might be used to write a literature review. The references must provide the author’s names, article title, date of publication, and journal name.

    Question Seven (.5 points): Choose ONE of the five articles that AI generated in Question Six (select one that you feel is most relevant to your semester project) and ask AI to give you a one paragraph summary of that article that highlights the main independent and dependent variables for the study. Copy / paste that summary into Canvas.

    Question Eight (.5 points): For the article you chose for Question Seven, evaluate it for accuracy and relevancy as well as for potential “AI hallucinations.” Address
    at least one of the following questions in two to three sentences: 1). Was the reference real or an AI hallucination? How can you tell? 2). Was the reference scholarly, empirical, and/or peer-reviewed? How can you tell? 3). Do you think the summary from AI was factual? How can you tell? 4). Is there any way for you to know where the information originally came from? How would you try to find it?

    Note: Be careful with AI “Hallucinations” as AI may give you a fake resource. For example, when preparing these library instructions, AI gave me a fake reference by Rafikoya & Voromin (2025). When I asked AI to summarize the article, AI told me: “It appears there is no record of a study by Rafikova & Voromin (2025) in the APA PsycINFO database. The earlier mention of that study was likely a placeholder or fictional reference.” So, double-check any response generated by AI as we will deduct points from YOUR grade if you submit AI generated hallucinations.

    **Step 3: Comparing AI and PsycINFO**

    Question Nine (.5 points): Look over the articles provided by your PsycINFO search and compare them to the results from AI. How do the results from AI and PsycINFO differ? How are they similar? Which results do you trust and why? What are some things to look for when searching for peer-reviewed empirical studies? Write two or three sentences.

    **Step 4: Your Semester Study**

    Question Ten
    _(.5 points)__:_ Give me your study predictions (for your Halo Effect study). Yes, this is an easy question! All you must do is copy and paste your study one predictions (and no, you do
    not need to write your own predictions for study one). You can find these predictions in your Assignment #4 (Study One Materials) Research Instructions. You can find the same predictions in the lab PowerPoint presentations (Labs 1, 2, and 3). You can even find them in the Paper One instructions. Find them, copy them, paste them (and make sure to use them in Paper One as you write that paper). In other words, for Question Ten, simply paste your predictions into the Canvas question ten box so I know that you know what your predictions are! I’ll even get you started!

    “We have several predictions in this study. First, …

    *APA Reference Examples

    a.
    **_Article Example_**:
    **The following is the most common type of APA reference for an article by two or more authors.**

    Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Periodical, volume number (issue number if present), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy

    Wiener, R. L., Winter, R., Rogers, M., & Arnot, L. (2004). The effects of prior workplace behavior on subsequent sexual harassment judgments.
    _Law and Human Behavior, 28_(1), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org /10.1023/B:LAHU.0000015003.72223.63

    b.
    **_Book Example_**:
    **The following is the most common type of APA reference for an article by two or more authors.**

    Author, A. A. (Year of publication).
    _Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle._ Publisher Name.

    Stoneman, R. (2008).
    _Alexander the Great: A life in legend._ Yale University Press.

    Bordens, K.S. & Abbott, B.B. (2008).
    _Research design and methods: A process approach_. (7th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    For a good resource for references, go to:

    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_articles_in_periodicals.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_articles_in_periodicals.html)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **ResearcherInstructions-FitnessInfluencerHalo.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researcherinstructions-fitnessinfluencerhalo-docx)

  • [Solved] Discussion 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As you saw from the lab PowerPoint slides last week, you will be doing a research study looking at “ **The Halo and Horns Effect**” for your first work.For this week’s discussion, I want you to discuss with your group what you think this study is about. There are five components to this discussion: …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As you saw from the lab PowerPoint slides last week, you will be doing a research study looking at

    “ **The Halo and Horns Effect**” for your first work.For this week’s discussion, I want you to discuss with your group what you think this study is about. There are five components to this discussion:

    1). What is (are) the hypothesis? You can either give me the "gist" of the study here or copy them from the researcher instructions for Study One.

    2). Do you agree with the predictions? That is, do you expect something different than the hypothesis in the researcher instructions? If yes, what and why? If no, justify why you think the predictions are inaccurate)?

    3). Do you think this is a good, testable hypothesis (If no, what would be a better, more "testable" phrasing for the hypotheses)?

    4). Do you see any ethical problems with this study? If so, how should you deal with those problems?

    5). With your discussion group, assess your project, noting one thing different you would do if you had the chance to design a similar study on your own (Hint: You’ll get the chance to build a follow-up study to this **Halo Effect** study in a few weeks, so think about what you would do different right now and you may get the chance to follow through with that new study later in the semester!).

    6). Finally (and optionally), ask AI about your study design and questions 1 through 5 above. I suggest copying and pasting the paragraphs from the debriefing statement (in the Researcher Instructions for Assignment #4) into AI. Ask AI to assess the design, to look at the reasonableness of the predictions, to discuss what else might influence participant responses, etc. Share your AI insights with your peers (though put it in your own words – don’t simply copy the AI output).

  • [Solved] discussion board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – What was it like to complete a BPSS assessment on yourself? – Did you learn anything new or gain a different perspective about yourself through the process? – Was there any information you felt was missing from the BPSS that would help create a more complete or holistic understanding of who you ar…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – What was it like to complete a BPSS assessment on yourself?
    – Did you learn anything new or gain a different perspective about yourself through the process?
    – Was there any information you felt was missing from the BPSS that would help create a more complete or holistic understanding of who you are?
    – How did it feel to identify your own strengths? Was this easy, difficult, or somewhere in between?
    – Did the Strengths Worksheets help you recognize strengths you might not have considered before? Why or why not?
    – In what ways might the Strengths Perspective be beneficial when working with future clients?
    – What challenges could arise when using a strengths-based approach with clients?
    – Thinking about the population or setting you hope to work in, how do you see yourself applying the Strengths Perspective in practice?

  • [Solved] A2 -CT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow instructions attached **files (4)** – ## Video.docx – ## AnalysisintheStudyofTrauma-PartOneAssignment.docx – ## AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartOneAssignmentInstructions.docx – ReadingChapt.3-9SapolskyR.M.2004.Whyzebrasdontgetulcers..pdf **## Video.docx** VIDEO 102: [https://s3.us-east-1.amazon…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow instructions attached

    **files (4)**

    – ## Video.docx

    – ## AnalysisintheStudyofTrauma-PartOneAssignment.docx

    – ## AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartOneAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ReadingChapt.3-9SapolskyR.M.2004.Whyzebrasdontgetulcers..pdf

    **## Video.docx**

    VIDEO

    102:
    [https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/liberty.lightuniversity/crisis_and_trauma_counseling_40/CTC102.mp4Links to an external site.](https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Fliberty.lightuniversity%2Fcrisis_and_trauma_counseling_40%2FCTC102.mp4&data=05%7C02%7Caddelacruz%40liberty.edu%7Ce60d8e90b18e4208a65108df06bf2a78%7Cbaf8218eb3024465a9934a39c97251b2%7C0%7C0%7C639237090251171118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LtU8ivxIiARpG4Obfa0mkyJdgZRXOSm%2B1R3qWJrPFF8%3D&reserved=0)

    **## AnalysisintheStudyofTrauma-PartOneAssignment.docx**

    **To review the assignment information, click on the document name to view or download the document.  Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.**

    [**Analysis in the Study of Trauma Part One Assignment Instructions**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1092027/files/126969446?wrap=1) [**Download Analysis in the Study of Trauma Part One Assignment Instructions**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1092027/files/126969446/download?download_frd=1)

    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Resources**

    ·
    [**Writing for Success: Compare/Contrast**](https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html)

    ·
    [**Comparing and Contrasting**](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/)

    **Note: Your assignment will be checked for origin**

    [https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html](https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html)

    [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/)

    **## AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartOneAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This course provides an overview of the aspects of stress and trauma, including examination of seminal texts and concepts. This assignment will establish a foundation to support course focus on understanding of trauma counseling, theories, and interventions that intersect with a number of traumatic events, how science informs the delivery of effective counseling theory and technique for these clients with the goal of integrating ethical, effective, and biblically grounded care. This assignment will also ground the learner in components of quality doctoral level writing as needed in preparation for the successful completion of the dissertation requirement. These key components are to demonstrate analysis of what you studied from multiple resources on a topic, what new insight you gained from that study, and how you can synthesize that into practice.
    **This assignment consists of three parts,** the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Assignment, a Discussion Forum with fellow learners on the analysis,** and the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part Two Assignment.**

    **Instructions**

    Review the document with the Canvas instructions on
    _Comparing and Contrasting._ Use your three course textbooks as reference and develop at least a one to two page paper (300 to 400 words) on the topic of
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma.** You must focus your paper on an aspect of trauma that you have interest in such as a specific aspect of the experience of trauma, a specific treatment of trauma, risk factors or protective factors in trauma impact – the choice of focus is yours as long as you base it on synthesized learning from at least two of your three course textbooks and at least two peer-reviewed scholarly articles published within the last five years.

    The submission must include the following:

    · Professional APA style Title Page

    · Professional APA style formatting to include appropriate APA headings for sections.

    · Introduction section

    · Two sections of content discussion with each section providing synthesis of insight from reference and citation of at least two of your textbook or article resources in each section. All references used must be cited in one of the two sections.

    ·
    **Comparison of Trauma Resources – In this section discuss how at least two of your references SHARE SIMILAR INSIGHT on your topic for this paper.**

    ·
    **Contrast of Trauma Resources – In this section discuss how at least two of your references HAVE DIFFERENCES WITH INSIGHT on your topic for this paper**.

    · Section on Biblical Integration to show comparison or differences with insight from scripture about your focus topic.

    · Conclusion section

    · References page.

    This submission, along with all other submissions in the course, are required to be formatted using current APA, professional standards, with the following:

    · Word Format – no PDF formats

    · Times New Roman Font

    · 12 Point Font

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Grading Rubric** before beginning this assignment.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **ReadingChapt.3-9SapolskyR.M.2004.Whyzebrasdontgetulcers..pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-3-9sapolskyr-m-2004-whyzebrasdontgetulcers-pdf)

    **ReadingChapt.3-9SapolskyR.M.2004.Whyzebrasdontgetulcers..pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-3-9sapolskyr-m-2004-whyzebrasdontgetulcers-pdf)

    **## Video.docx**

    VIDEO

    102:
    [https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/liberty.lightuniversity/crisis_and_trauma_counseling_40/CTC102.mp4Links to an external site.](https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Fliberty.lightuniversity%2Fcrisis_and_trauma_counseling_40%2FCTC102.mp4&data=05%7C02%7Caddelacruz%40liberty.edu%7Ce60d8e90b18e4208a65108df06bf2a78%7Cbaf8218eb3024465a9934a39c97251b2%7C0%7C0%7C639237090251171118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LtU8ivxIiARpG4Obfa0mkyJdgZRXOSm%2B1R3qWJrPFF8%3D&reserved=0)

    **## AnalysisintheStudyofTrauma-PartOneAssignment.docx**

    **To review the assignment information, click on the document name to view or download the document.  Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.**

    [**Analysis in the Study of Trauma Part One Assignment Instructions**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1092027/files/126969446?wrap=1) [**Download Analysis in the Study of Trauma Part One Assignment Instructions**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1092027/files/126969446/download?download_frd=1)

    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Resources**

    ·
    [**Writing for Success: Compare/Contrast**](https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html)

    ·
    [**Comparing and Contrasting**](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/)

    **Note: Your assignment will be checked for origin**

    [https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html](https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html)

    [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/)

    **## AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartOneAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This course provides an overview of the aspects of stress and trauma, including examination of seminal texts and concepts. This assignment will establish a foundation to support course focus on understanding of trauma counseling, theories, and interventions that intersect with a number of traumatic events, how science informs the delivery of effective counseling theory and technique for these clients with the goal of integrating ethical, effective, and biblically grounded care. This assignment will also ground the learner in components of quality doctoral level writing as needed in preparation for the successful completion of the dissertation requirement. These key components are to demonstrate analysis of what you studied from multiple resources on a topic, what new insight you gained from that study, and how you can synthesize that into practice.
    **This assignment consists of three parts,** the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Assignment, a Discussion Forum with fellow learners on the analysis,** and the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part Two Assignment.**

    **Instructions**

    Review the document with the Canvas instructions on
    _Comparing and Contrasting._ Use your three course textbooks as reference and develop at least a one to two page paper (300 to 400 words) on the topic of
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma.** You must focus your paper on an aspect of trauma that you have interest in such as a specific aspect of the experience of trauma, a specific treatment of trauma, risk factors or protective factors in trauma impact – the choice of focus is yours as long as you base it on synthesized learning from at least two of your three course textbooks and at least two peer-reviewed scholarly articles published within the last five years.

    The submission must include the following:

    · Professional APA style Title Page

    · Professional APA style formatting to include appropriate APA headings for sections.

    · Introduction section

    · Two sections of content discussion with each section providing synthesis of insight from reference and citation of at least two of your textbook or article resources in each section. All references used must be cited in one of the two sections.

    ·
    **Comparison of Trauma Resources – In this section discuss how at least two of your references SHARE SIMILAR INSIGHT on your topic for this paper.**

    ·
    **Contrast of Trauma Resources – In this section discuss how at least two of your references HAVE DIFFERENCES WITH INSIGHT on your topic for this paper**.

    · Section on Biblical Integration to show comparison or differences with insight from scripture about your focus topic.

    · Conclusion section

    · References page.

    This submission, along with all other submissions in the course, are required to be formatted using current APA, professional standards, with the following:

    · Word Format – no PDF formats

    · Times New Roman Font

    · 12 Point Font

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Grading Rubric** before beginning this assignment.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **ReadingChapt.3-9SapolskyR.M.2004.Whyzebrasdontgetulcers..pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-3-9sapolskyr-m-2004-whyzebrasdontgetulcers-pdf)

    **## Video.docx**

    VIDEO

    102:
    [https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/liberty.lightuniversity/crisis_and_trauma_counseling_40/CTC102.mp4Links to an external site.](https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Fliberty.lightuniversity%2Fcrisis_and_trauma_counseling_40%2FCTC102.mp4&data=05%7C02%7Caddelacruz%40liberty.edu%7Ce60d8e90b18e4208a65108df06bf2a78%7Cbaf8218eb3024465a9934a39c97251b2%7C0%7C0%7C639237090251171118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LtU8ivxIiARpG4Obfa0mkyJdgZRXOSm%2B1R3qWJrPFF8%3D&reserved=0)

    **## AnalysisintheStudyofTrauma-PartOneAssignment.docx**

    **To review the assignment information, click on the document name to view or download the document.  Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.**

    [**Analysis in the Study of Trauma Part One Assignment Instructions**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1092027/files/126969446?wrap=1) [**Download Analysis in the Study of Trauma Part One Assignment Instructions**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1092027/files/126969446/download?download_frd=1)

    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Resources**

    ·
    [**Writing for Success: Compare/Contrast**](https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html)

    ·
    [**Comparing and Contrasting**](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/)

    **Note: Your assignment will be checked for origin**

    [https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html](https://www.kellogg.edu/upload/eng151/chapter/writing-for-success-comparecontrast/index.html)

    [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/comparing-and-contrasting/)

    **## AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartOneAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This course provides an overview of the aspects of stress and trauma, including examination of seminal texts and concepts. This assignment will establish a foundation to support course focus on understanding of trauma counseling, theories, and interventions that intersect with a number of traumatic events, how science informs the delivery of effective counseling theory and technique for these clients with the goal of integrating ethical, effective, and biblically grounded care. This assignment will also ground the learner in components of quality doctoral level writing as needed in preparation for the successful completion of the dissertation requirement. These key components are to demonstrate analysis of what you studied from multiple resources on a topic, what new insight you gained from that study, and how you can synthesize that into practice.
    **This assignment consists of three parts,** the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Assignment, a Discussion Forum with fellow learners on the analysis,** and the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part Two Assignment.**

    **Instructions**

    Review the document with the Canvas instructions on
    _Comparing and Contrasting._ Use your three course textbooks as reference and develop at least a one to two page paper (300 to 400 words) on the topic of
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma.** You must focus your paper on an aspect of trauma that you have interest in such as a specific aspect of the experience of trauma, a specific treatment of trauma, risk factors or protective factors in trauma impact – the choice of focus is yours as long as you base it on synthesized learning from at least two of your three course textbooks and at least two peer-reviewed scholarly articles published within the last five years.

    The submission must include the following:

    · Professional APA style Title Page

    · Professional APA style formatting to include appropriate APA headings for sections.

    · Introduction section

    · Two sections of content discussion with each section providing synthesis of insight from reference and citation of at least two of your textbook or article resources in each section. All references used must be cited in one of the two sections.

    ·
    **Comparison of Trauma Resources – In this section discuss how at least two of your references SHARE SIMILAR INSIGHT on your topic for this paper.**

    ·
    **Contrast of Trauma Resources – In this section discuss how at least two of your references HAVE DIFFERENCES WITH INSIGHT on your topic for this paper**.

    · Section on Biblical Integration to show comparison or differences with insight from scripture about your focus topic.

    · Conclusion section

    · References page.

    This submission, along with all other submissions in the course, are required to be formatted using current APA, professional standards, with the following:

    · Word Format – no PDF formats

    · Times New Roman Font

    · 12 Point Font

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Analysis in the Study of Trauma: Part One Grading Rubric** before beginning this assignment.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **ReadingChapt.3-9SapolskyR.M.2004.Whyzebrasdontgetulcers..pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-3-9sapolskyr-m-2004-whyzebrasdontgetulcers-pdf)

  • [Solved] 9000 Week One Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See The Attached File For Week One Discussion. I Also Attached A Photo To Use! You Should Know Me By Now! – [\ \ Assignment.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment-jpeg-10591451 "Assignment.jpeg") – [\ \ 2026-08-25.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/2026-08-25-png "2026-08-25.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See The Attached File For Week One Discussion. I Also Attached A Photo To Use! You Should Know Me By Now!

    – [\
    \
    Assignment.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment-jpeg-10591451 "Assignment.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    2026-08-25.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/2026-08-25-png "2026-08-25.png")

  • [Solved] Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attachment **files (1)** – ## ReviewDirections.docx **## ReviewDirections.docx** Directions: Using the following text, write a 5-page review of Problem Solving Therapy. **Haley, J. Problem-Solving Therapy, ISBN – 13: 978-1555423629** · Provide your critical analysis of the material · What appeal…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## ReviewDirections.docx

    **## ReviewDirections.docx**

    Directions:

    Using the following text, write a 5-page review of Problem Solving Therapy.

    **Haley, J. Problem-Solving Therapy, ISBN – 13: 978-1555423629**

    · Provide your critical analysis of the material

    · What appealed to you?

    · What you found useful, or not as useful?

    · How might you incorporate Haley’s concepts into your work as a family counselor?

    · 5 Pages, APA Format, 12 Point Font, Times New Roman, Double Spaced, 1” margins

    **100% NO PLAGIARISM OR AI**

    **## ReviewDirections.docx**

    Directions:

    Using the following text, write a 5-page review of Problem Solving Therapy.

    **Haley, J. Problem-Solving Therapy, ISBN – 13: 978-1555423629**

    · Provide your critical analysis of the material

    · What appealed to you?

    · What you found useful, or not as useful?

    · How might you incorporate Haley’s concepts into your work as a family counselor?

    · 5 Pages, APA Format, 12 Point Font, Times New Roman, Double Spaced, 1” margins

    **100% NO PLAGIARISM OR AI**

  • [Solved] Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me with this **files (2)** – ## ArticleReviewInstructions-TherapeuticRelationship.docx – EBSCO-FullText-09_02_2026.pdf **## ArticleReviewInstructions-TherapeuticRelationship.docx** **Article Review Instructions** You will write **two** article reviews for this course. The review s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me with this

    **files (2)**

    – ## ArticleReviewInstructions-TherapeuticRelationship.docx

    – EBSCO-FullText-09_02_2026.pdf

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions-TherapeuticRelationship.docx**

    **Article Review Instructions**

    You will write
    **two** article reviews for this course. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point, Times New Roman font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am interested in is your critique.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper? Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?). The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study. A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses. If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found. Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    **Critique**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? How does it relate to other weekly readings?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus. Purdue OWL is also a great resource.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · Your organization, grammar, and spelling

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-02-2026-pdf)

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-02-2026-pdf)

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions-TherapeuticRelationship.docx**

    **Article Review Instructions**

    You will write
    **two** article reviews for this course. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point, Times New Roman font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am interested in is your critique.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper? Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?). The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study. A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses. If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found. Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    **Critique**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? How does it relate to other weekly readings?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus. Purdue OWL is also a great resource.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · Your organization, grammar, and spelling

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-02-2026-pdf)

    **## ArticleReviewInstructions-TherapeuticRelationship.docx**

    **Article Review Instructions**

    You will write
    **two** article reviews for this course. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point, Times New Roman font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am interested in is your critique.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper? Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?). The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study. A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses. If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found. Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    **Critique**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? How does it relate to other weekly readings?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus. Purdue OWL is also a great resource.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · Your organization, grammar, and spelling

    **EBSCO-FullText-09_02_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-09-02-2026-pdf)

  • [Solved] PSYCH SOAP 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## SOAP1RUBRIC.pdf **## SOAP1RUBRIC.pdf** Grading Rubric for SOAP Notes Updated Course: NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I Criteria Unacceptable 0 points Acceptable 8 points Good 14 points Excellent 20 points Criterion Score Subjective Data / 20CC is not recorded. HPI does not…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## SOAP1RUBRIC.pdf

    **## SOAP1RUBRIC.pdf**

    Grading Rubric for SOAP Notes Updated
    Course: NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Subjective Data / 20CC is not recorded.

    HPI does not reflect

    a chronological ac-

    count of symptoms

    that are sufficiently

    descriptive to vali-

    date Dx per DSM-5

    criteria. Pertinent

    negatives are not in-

    cluded. The longitu-

    dinal course of ill-

    ness is nonexistent.

    CC is clear. HPI pro-

    vides an account of

    symptoms that are

    descriptive,

    nonchronological,

    without context,

    and do not clearly

    validate Dx per

    DSM-5 criteria. Few

    pertinent negatives

    are included. A lon-

    gitudinal course of

    illness is unclear.

    Current medications

    are included.

    CC is clear, concise

    and verbatim from

    pt. HPI is thorough

    yet concise and pro-

    vides a chronologi-

    cal account of symp-

    toms with some

    contextual factors

    that are sufficiently

    descriptive (oldcarts)

    to validate Dx per

    DSM-5 criteria.

    Pertinent negatives

    are included. A lon-

    gitudinal course of

    illness is apprecia-

    ble. Current psychi-

    atric medications

    and response are

    included.

    CC is clear, concise

    and verbatim from

    pt. HPI is thorough

    yet concise and pro-

    vides a chronologi-

    cal account of symp-

    toms and contextual

    factors that are suf-

    ficiently descriptive

    (oldcarts) to validate

    Dx per DSM-5 crite-

    ria. All pertinent

    negatives are in-

    cluded. A longitudi-

    nal course of illness

    is clear. Current psy-

    chiatric medications

    and response are

    included.

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 1/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Objective Data / 20MSE missing most

    elements.

    MSE contains re-

    quired elements.

    Is in narrative form

    and effectively and

    vividly describes the

    patient’s presenta-

    tion. Concrete ex-

    amples of all assess-

    ment results are in-

    cluded i.e.. “able to

    correctly interpret

    2/3 simple

    proverbs” to validate

    documentation of

    “abstract thought

    intact”.

    MSE contains re-

    quired elements.

    Is in narrative form

    and effectively and

    vividly describes the

    patient’s presenta-

    tion. Concrete ex-

    amples of all assess-

    ment results are in-

    cluded i.e.. “able to

    correctly interpret

    2/3 simple

    proverbs” to validate

    documentation of

    “abstract thought

    intact”.

    MSE contains re-

    quired elements.

    Is in narrative form

    and effectively and

    vividly describes the

    patient’s presenta-

    tion. Concrete ex-

    amples of all assess-

    ment results are in-

    cluded i.e.. “able to

    correctly interpret

    2/3 simple

    proverbs” to validate

    documentation of

    “abstract thought

    intact”.

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 2/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Assessment / 20Differential is imper-

    tinent to S&S or ab-

    sent. Formulation

    does not support

    nor clearly outline

    thought process of

    diagnoses.

    Diagnoses tendered

    are not supported

    by criteria in the HPI

    description or sub-

    stantiated with the

    MSE.

    Differential is imper-

    tinent to S&S, for-

    mulation appears

    rudimentary and

    vague. Diagnoses

    are made per DSM-

    5 but are marginally

    reasonable. Criteria

    for diagnoses ten-

    dered are not ex-

    plicit in the HPI de-

    scription or substan-

    tiated with the MSE.

    Differential is perti-

    nent to S&S, formu-

    lation contains evi-

    dence of critical

    thought and subject

    knowledge, and rea-

    sonable diagnoses

    are made per DSM-

    5. Clearly met crite-

    ria for diagnoses

    tendered are explicit

    in the HPI descrip-

    tion and substanti-

    ated with the MSE

    Differential is perti-

    nent to S&S, formu-

    lation contains evi-

    dence of critical

    thought and subject

    knowledge, and rea-

    sonable diagnoses

    are made per DSM-

    5. Clearly met crite-

    ria for diagnoses

    tendered are explicit

    in the HPI descrip-

    tion and substanti-

    ated with the MSE

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 3/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Plan / 20Treatment plan is

    presented without

    sound rationales.

    There is no evidence

    of synthesis of infor-

    mation or critical

    thought. Does not

    include neurobiol-

    ogy of disorder

    Evidence-based

    treatment plan is

    presented with mini-

    mal rationales.

    Rationales reflect

    the student’s mar-

    ginal ability to

    choose treatments

    based not only on

    FDA approval or

    current evidence

    but also the nuances

    and unique charac-

    teristics of each.

    Treatment plan is

    reasonable but lacks

    comprehensiveness.

    There is minimal evi-

    dence of synthesis

    of information and

    critical thought.

    Includes limited

    neurobiology infor-

    mation on the

    disorder

    Evidence-based

    treatment plan is

    presented with ra-

    tionales. Level of de-

    tail reflects the

    student’s moderate

    ability to choose

    treatments based

    not only on FDA ap-

    proval or current ev-

    idence but also the

    nuances and unique

    characteristics of

    each. Treatment

    plan is holistic and

    comprehensive.

    There is some evi-

    dence of the

    student’s synthesis

    of information and

    critical thought.

    Includes neurobiol-

    ogy information on

    the disorder

    Evidence-based

    treatment plan is

    presented with de-

    tailed rationales.

    Level of detail re-

    flects the student’s

    ability to choose

    treatments based

    not only on FDA ap-

    proval or current ev-

    idence but also the

    nuances and unique

    characteristics of

    each. Treatment

    plan is holistic and

    comprehensive.

    There is strong evi-

    dence of the

    student’s synthesis

    of information and

    critical thought.

    Includes neurobiol-

    ogy information on

    the disorder

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 4/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Writing,

    Support, APA

    / 20The format is not

    consistent with the

    example provided in

    the course. No re-

    cent, scholarly,

    peer- reviewed sup-

    port of topic.

    Substantial gram-

    mar, spelling, and

    punctuation errors

    detracting from the

    assignment. Writing

    mechanics include

    many awkward or

    unclear passages

    and informal tone

    not consistent with

    formal scholarly

    work. Substantial er-

    rors in APA style

    based upon the re-

    quired APA manuals

    listed on the course

    syllabi.

    The format is

    marginally consis-

    tent with the exam-

    ple provided in the

    course. Limited re-

    cent (5-7 years),

    scholarly, peer- re-

    viewed support of

    topics. Occasional

    spelling, grammar,

    and punctuation er-

    rors detracting from

    the assignment.

    Writing mechanics

    include awkward or

    unclear passages

    and informal tone

    not always consis-

    tent with formal

    scholarly work.

    Occasional errors in

    APA style based

    upon the required

    APA manuals listed

    on the course

    syllabi.

    The format is fairly

    consistent with the

    example provided in

    the course. Clear,

    recent (5-7 years),

    scholarly, peer- re-

    viewed support of

    topics. Minimal

    grammar, spelling,

    and punctuation er-

    rors. Writing me-

    chanics include min-

    imal awkward or un-

    clear passages but

    are consistent with

    formal scholarly

    work. Minimal er-

    rors in APA style

    manuals listed on

    the course syllabi

    The format is con-

    sistent with the ex-

    ample provided in

    the course. Strong,

    recent (5-7 years),

    scholarly, peer- re-

    viewed support of

    topics. No grammar,

    spelling, and punc-

    tuation errors.

    Writing mechanics

    are consistent with

    formal scholarly

    work. No errors in

    APA style based

    upon the required

    APA manuals listed

    on the course

    syllabi.

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 5/6

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Level 1
    0 points minimum

    Level 2
    5 points minimum

    Level 3
    8 points minimum

    Level 4
    11 points minimum

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 6/6

    **## SOAP1RUBRIC.pdf**

    Grading Rubric for SOAP Notes Updated
    Course: NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Subjective Data / 20CC is not recorded.

    HPI does not reflect

    a chronological ac-

    count of symptoms

    that are sufficiently

    descriptive to vali-

    date Dx per DSM-5

    criteria. Pertinent

    negatives are not in-

    cluded. The longitu-

    dinal course of ill-

    ness is nonexistent.

    CC is clear. HPI pro-

    vides an account of

    symptoms that are

    descriptive,

    nonchronological,

    without context,

    and do not clearly

    validate Dx per

    DSM-5 criteria. Few

    pertinent negatives

    are included. A lon-

    gitudinal course of

    illness is unclear.

    Current medications

    are included.

    CC is clear, concise

    and verbatim from

    pt. HPI is thorough

    yet concise and pro-

    vides a chronologi-

    cal account of symp-

    toms with some

    contextual factors

    that are sufficiently

    descriptive (oldcarts)

    to validate Dx per

    DSM-5 criteria.

    Pertinent negatives

    are included. A lon-

    gitudinal course of

    illness is apprecia-

    ble. Current psychi-

    atric medications

    and response are

    included.

    CC is clear, concise

    and verbatim from

    pt. HPI is thorough

    yet concise and pro-

    vides a chronologi-

    cal account of symp-

    toms and contextual

    factors that are suf-

    ficiently descriptive

    (oldcarts) to validate

    Dx per DSM-5 crite-

    ria. All pertinent

    negatives are in-

    cluded. A longitudi-

    nal course of illness

    is clear. Current psy-

    chiatric medications

    and response are

    included.

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 1/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Objective Data / 20MSE missing most

    elements.

    MSE contains re-

    quired elements.

    Is in narrative form

    and effectively and

    vividly describes the

    patient’s presenta-

    tion. Concrete ex-

    amples of all assess-

    ment results are in-

    cluded i.e.. “able to

    correctly interpret

    2/3 simple

    proverbs” to validate

    documentation of

    “abstract thought

    intact”.

    MSE contains re-

    quired elements.

    Is in narrative form

    and effectively and

    vividly describes the

    patient’s presenta-

    tion. Concrete ex-

    amples of all assess-

    ment results are in-

    cluded i.e.. “able to

    correctly interpret

    2/3 simple

    proverbs” to validate

    documentation of

    “abstract thought

    intact”.

    MSE contains re-

    quired elements.

    Is in narrative form

    and effectively and

    vividly describes the

    patient’s presenta-

    tion. Concrete ex-

    amples of all assess-

    ment results are in-

    cluded i.e.. “able to

    correctly interpret

    2/3 simple

    proverbs” to validate

    documentation of

    “abstract thought

    intact”.

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 2/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Assessment / 20Differential is imper-

    tinent to S&S or ab-

    sent. Formulation

    does not support

    nor clearly outline

    thought process of

    diagnoses.

    Diagnoses tendered

    are not supported

    by criteria in the HPI

    description or sub-

    stantiated with the

    MSE.

    Differential is imper-

    tinent to S&S, for-

    mulation appears

    rudimentary and

    vague. Diagnoses

    are made per DSM-

    5 but are marginally

    reasonable. Criteria

    for diagnoses ten-

    dered are not ex-

    plicit in the HPI de-

    scription or substan-

    tiated with the MSE.

    Differential is perti-

    nent to S&S, formu-

    lation contains evi-

    dence of critical

    thought and subject

    knowledge, and rea-

    sonable diagnoses

    are made per DSM-

    5. Clearly met crite-

    ria for diagnoses

    tendered are explicit

    in the HPI descrip-

    tion and substanti-

    ated with the MSE

    Differential is perti-

    nent to S&S, formu-

    lation contains evi-

    dence of critical

    thought and subject

    knowledge, and rea-

    sonable diagnoses

    are made per DSM-

    5. Clearly met crite-

    ria for diagnoses

    tendered are explicit

    in the HPI descrip-

    tion and substanti-

    ated with the MSE

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 3/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Plan / 20Treatment plan is

    presented without

    sound rationales.

    There is no evidence

    of synthesis of infor-

    mation or critical

    thought. Does not

    include neurobiol-

    ogy of disorder

    Evidence-based

    treatment plan is

    presented with mini-

    mal rationales.

    Rationales reflect

    the student’s mar-

    ginal ability to

    choose treatments

    based not only on

    FDA approval or

    current evidence

    but also the nuances

    and unique charac-

    teristics of each.

    Treatment plan is

    reasonable but lacks

    comprehensiveness.

    There is minimal evi-

    dence of synthesis

    of information and

    critical thought.

    Includes limited

    neurobiology infor-

    mation on the

    disorder

    Evidence-based

    treatment plan is

    presented with ra-

    tionales. Level of de-

    tail reflects the

    student’s moderate

    ability to choose

    treatments based

    not only on FDA ap-

    proval or current ev-

    idence but also the

    nuances and unique

    characteristics of

    each. Treatment

    plan is holistic and

    comprehensive.

    There is some evi-

    dence of the

    student’s synthesis

    of information and

    critical thought.

    Includes neurobiol-

    ogy information on

    the disorder

    Evidence-based

    treatment plan is

    presented with de-

    tailed rationales.

    Level of detail re-

    flects the student’s

    ability to choose

    treatments based

    not only on FDA ap-

    proval or current ev-

    idence but also the

    nuances and unique

    characteristics of

    each. Treatment

    plan is holistic and

    comprehensive.

    There is strong evi-

    dence of the

    student’s synthesis

    of information and

    critical thought.

    Includes neurobiol-

    ogy information on

    the disorder

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 4/6

    Criteria
    Unacceptable
    0 points

    Acceptable
    8 points

    Good
    14 points

    Excellent
    20 points

    Criterion Score

    Writing,

    Support, APA

    / 20The format is not

    consistent with the

    example provided in

    the course. No re-

    cent, scholarly,

    peer- reviewed sup-

    port of topic.

    Substantial gram-

    mar, spelling, and

    punctuation errors

    detracting from the

    assignment. Writing

    mechanics include

    many awkward or

    unclear passages

    and informal tone

    not consistent with

    formal scholarly

    work. Substantial er-

    rors in APA style

    based upon the re-

    quired APA manuals

    listed on the course

    syllabi.

    The format is

    marginally consis-

    tent with the exam-

    ple provided in the

    course. Limited re-

    cent (5-7 years),

    scholarly, peer- re-

    viewed support of

    topics. Occasional

    spelling, grammar,

    and punctuation er-

    rors detracting from

    the assignment.

    Writing mechanics

    include awkward or

    unclear passages

    and informal tone

    not always consis-

    tent with formal

    scholarly work.

    Occasional errors in

    APA style based

    upon the required

    APA manuals listed

    on the course

    syllabi.

    The format is fairly

    consistent with the

    example provided in

    the course. Clear,

    recent (5-7 years),

    scholarly, peer- re-

    viewed support of

    topics. Minimal

    grammar, spelling,

    and punctuation er-

    rors. Writing me-

    chanics include min-

    imal awkward or un-

    clear passages but

    are consistent with

    formal scholarly

    work. Minimal er-

    rors in APA style

    manuals listed on

    the course syllabi

    The format is con-

    sistent with the ex-

    ample provided in

    the course. Strong,

    recent (5-7 years),

    scholarly, peer- re-

    viewed support of

    topics. No grammar,

    spelling, and punc-

    tuation errors.

    Writing mechanics

    are consistent with

    formal scholarly

    work. No errors in

    APA style based

    upon the required

    APA manuals listed

    on the course

    syllabi.

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 5/6

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Level 1
    0 points minimum

    Level 2
    5 points minimum

    Level 3
    8 points minimum

    Level 4
    11 points minimum

    9/2/26, 6:42 PM Soap Note 1 (assignment folder) – NSG-535-IKK – Adv Prac in Psych/MH Nurs I – L.I.V.E. – Wilkes University

    https://live.wilkes.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=709130&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=387997 6/6

  • [Solved] psychology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## leaderinterview.docx **## leaderinterview.docx** Interview of a Leader (Write a minimum 2 paragraph summary of your Leadership Interview covering your review from your Leader interview and emphasize Leader type used, power and influence tactics used, Proactive influences used, and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## leaderinterview.docx

    **## leaderinterview.docx**

    Interview of a Leader (Write a minimum 2 paragraph summary of your Leadership Interview covering your review from your Leader interview and emphasize Leader type used, power and influence tactics used, Proactive influences used, and Team approaches used by your leader interviewee.

    (Community, Political, Corporate, Small Business, Religious, etc.)

    Discuss the type of Leader type: (Charismatic, Transformational, Values-based,

    etc.),

    Power and influence tactics used by this leader: (Reward, Coercive,

    Legitimate, Expert, Referent,

    *Proactive Influence tactics: (see tables on pages 154 & p. 160).

    Discuss whether the Leader uses Teams to Lead approaches with the four types of teams: (Cross-functional Team, Self-Managed Operating Team, Top Executive Team, Characteristic Team – see p. 285).

    Grading Rubric:

    Overall Leader Interview and position described. – 10 points

    Discussion of Leader types, influence tactics, and Team leadership. 40 points

    ***Table on page 154 & 160**

    Definition of the 11 Proactive Influence Tactics

    **Rational Persuasion**: The agent uses logical arguments and factual evidence to show a proposal or request is feasible and relevant for attaining important task objectives.

    **Apprising**: The agent explains how carrying out a request or supporting a proposal will benefit the target personally or help advance the target person’s career.

    Inspirational Appeals: The agent makes an appeal to values and ideals or seeks to arouse the target person’s emotions to gain commitment for a request or proposal.

    **Consultation**: The agent encourages the target to suggest improvements in a proposal or to help plan an activity or change for which the target person’s support and assistance are desired.

    **Collaboration**: The agent offers to provide relevant resources and assistance if the target will carry out a request or approve a proposed change.

    **Ingratiation**: The agent uses praise and flattery before or during an influence attempt or expresses confidence in the target’s ability to carry out a difficult request.

    **Personal Appeals**: The agent asks the target to carry out a request or support a proposal out of friendship or asks for a personal favor before saying what it is.

    **Exchange:** The agent offers an incentive, suggests an exchange of favors, or indicates willingness to reciprocate at a later time if the target will do what the agent requests.

    **Coalition Tactics**: The agent seeks the aid of others to persuade the target to do something or uses the support of others as a reason for the target to agree.

    **Legitimating Tactics**: The agent seeks to establish the legitimacy of a request or to verify authority to make it by referring to rules, policies, contracts, or precedent.

    **Pressure:** The agent uses demands, threats, frequent checking, or persistent reminders to influence the target to carry out a request.

    **## leaderinterview.docx**

    Interview of a Leader (Write a minimum 2 paragraph summary of your Leadership Interview covering your review from your Leader interview and emphasize Leader type used, power and influence tactics used, Proactive influences used, and Team approaches used by your leader interviewee.

    (Community, Political, Corporate, Small Business, Religious, etc.)

    Discuss the type of Leader type: (Charismatic, Transformational, Values-based,

    etc.),

    Power and influence tactics used by this leader: (Reward, Coercive,

    Legitimate, Expert, Referent,

    *Proactive Influence tactics: (see tables on pages 154 & p. 160).

    Discuss whether the Leader uses Teams to Lead approaches with the four types of teams: (Cross-functional Team, Self-Managed Operating Team, Top Executive Team, Characteristic Team – see p. 285).

    Grading Rubric:

    Overall Leader Interview and position described. – 10 points

    Discussion of Leader types, influence tactics, and Team leadership. 40 points

    ***Table on page 154 & 160**

    Definition of the 11 Proactive Influence Tactics

    **Rational Persuasion**: The agent uses logical arguments and factual evidence to show a proposal or request is feasible and relevant for attaining important task objectives.

    **Apprising**: The agent explains how carrying out a request or supporting a proposal will benefit the target personally or help advance the target person’s career.

    Inspirational Appeals: The agent makes an appeal to values and ideals or seeks to arouse the target person’s emotions to gain commitment for a request or proposal.

    **Consultation**: The agent encourages the target to suggest improvements in a proposal or to help plan an activity or change for which the target person’s support and assistance are desired.

    **Collaboration**: The agent offers to provide relevant resources and assistance if the target will carry out a request or approve a proposed change.

    **Ingratiation**: The agent uses praise and flattery before or during an influence attempt or expresses confidence in the target’s ability to carry out a difficult request.

    **Personal Appeals**: The agent asks the target to carry out a request or support a proposal out of friendship or asks for a personal favor before saying what it is.

    **Exchange:** The agent offers an incentive, suggests an exchange of favors, or indicates willingness to reciprocate at a later time if the target will do what the agent requests.

    **Coalition Tactics**: The agent seeks the aid of others to persuade the target to do something or uses the support of others as a reason for the target to agree.

    **Legitimating Tactics**: The agent seeks to establish the legitimacy of a request or to verify authority to make it by referring to rules, policies, contracts, or precedent.

    **Pressure:** The agent uses demands, threats, frequent checking, or persistent reminders to influence the target to carry out a request.