Tag: Psychology

  • [Solved] see below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow instructions on this – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Week2_Assignment.pdf – Week2_LearningResources_Cross-CulturalPsychology-Spring2025.pdf **## Week2_Assignment.pdf** Due Mar 9 by 10:59pm Points 80 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignme…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow instructions on this

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Week2_Assignment.pdf

    – Week2_LearningResources_Cross-CulturalPsychology-Spring2025.pdf

    **## Week2_Assignment.pdf**

    Due Mar 9 by 10:59pm
    Points 80
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064

    In this week’s Learning Resources, there is a video with historical footage of immigrants arriving at Ellis
    Island in New York Harbor. If you have not viewed this video, stop and do so now—or watch it again, this
    time with the perspective of what it would feel like to be in that scene. You may have relatives that
    arrived through Ellis Island or a similar entry point in other parts of the country. Imagine being in that
    moment, having endured great hardship, and then facing a test that checks your intelligence—and for no
    small reason. It will determine whether you can enter the United States.

    Based on what you are learning about culture, is it likely that test would be fair in assessing the
    knowledge of those who speak languages other than English and have wildly different sets of
    experiences? Additionally, different cultures have different definitions of intelligence. Some cultures
    integrate movement and emotions into the concept of intelligence. Other cultures value analytical
    thinking. Still others highlight nonverbal communication. Sadly, many Ellis Island immigrants were
    labeled “feeble-minded” by extremely biased intelligence tests and, after all those hardships, were
    refused entry into America.

    You will return to the issue of bias by examining how intelligence tests can favor some cultures over
    others. Through the Learning Resources, you will experience two unique intelligence tests and imagine
    how you might do if each test had major stakes for you—such as whether you could vote, be accepted
    by a college, or be allowed to enter a country. Intelligence tests have been used for those and other
    purposes—and sometimes with the express purpose of excluding some groups over others.

    For this Assignment, you will examine how culture influences the perspective from which various people
    view the concept of “intelligence.” As you take the Chitling Test and Original Australian Test, you may find
    yourself wondering what some questions have to do with intelligence. Just remember, many tests
    throughout history have been based on the idea that there are things that “everyone” should know. When
    you take the Free IQ Test, you may find that the questions are more familiar, but is that just because of
    your cultural background?

    INTELLIGENCE

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064)

    Review the Learning Resources for this week, with particular attention to Chapter 5 in the course text
    and the media program on Ellis Island immigration.
    Access and complete the Free IQ Test found in the Learning Resources for this week. Note: This test
    is to be completed online. Make sure to save your results.
    Access and complete “The Original Australian Test of Intelligence” and “The Chitling Intelligence
    Test,” in the Learning Resources. Note: The tests cannot be filled in online. Use paper and pencil to
    record your answers, and then click the scoring sheet link to check your results.
    Consider how well you did on each test. What kind of knowledge was needed to do well, and how
    “common” is that knowledge? Consider questions in all three tests that stand out to you as examples
    of cultural bias.
    Based on your experience, consider what conclusions you can draw about the meaning of
    “intelligence” and “common knowledge” across cultures and the potential for constructing an
    intelligence test without cultural bias.
    Consider the various views of intelligence discussed in your Learning Resources and consider how
    they are similar or different from your own views.
    Keep in mind the goal of supporting your viewpoints with clear reasoning and evidence as noted in
    the Walden Writing Center resources. Consider how you can incorporate the use of evidence in your
    writing to further develop your scholarly writing skills.
    Review the Writing Center resources to understand APA style and the overall expectations of
    scholarly writing at Walden. Use the “Undergraduate Paper with Advice APA 7” course template for
    this Assignment.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067)

    TO PREPARE:

    ASSIGNMENT:

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067)

    PSYC_2001_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

    Write a 2-page paper that addresses the following components. Be sure to include references to
    Learning Resources, including media.

    Explain how immigrants at Ellis Island must have felt when presented with questions that may not
    have made any sense to them. (Note: After taking the Chitling and Australian tests, you may be able
    to relate.) Discuss whether or not you have ever felt that standardized tests did not accurately assess
    your abilities. Why or why not?
    Though many common standardized tests, including IQ tests, are considered to be dependable and
    valid, is it possible that they are biased simply because they were made with one cultural view of
    intelligence in mind? Further explain your thoughts on the issue of bias in intelligence testing based
    on your readings and activities this week.
    Compare your own view of intelligence with the various perspectives studied this week. What
    cultures have perspectives similar to yours?
    Do you believe that intelligence can be measured in a way that is fair to everyone? Describe how you
    would assess abilities and potential fairly.

    Support the responses within your assignment with credited evidence from the assigned learning
    resources (including sentence-level citations). Provide a reference list in APA Style for resources you
    used in the assignment.

    Submit your Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn+last
    name+first initial.

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    15 pts

    Explain how
    immigrants at
    Ellis Island
    must have felt
    when
    presented
    with
    questions that
    may not have
    made any
    sense to
    them.
    Discuss
    whether or
    not you have
    ever felt that
    standardized
    tests did not
    accurately
    assess your
    abilities. Why
    or why not?
    (10 points)

    10 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    8.5 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    7.5 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    6.5 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Is it possible
    that
    intelligence
    tests are
    biased simply
    because they
    were made
    with one
    cultural view
    of intelligence
    in mind?
    Further
    explain your
    thoughts on
    the issue of
    bias in
    intelligence
    testing. (15
    points)

    15 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    12 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    11 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    9 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    20 pts

    20 pts

    15 pts

    Compare
    your own
    view of
    intelligence
    with the
    various
    perspectives
    studied this
    week. What
    cultures have
    perspectives
    similar to
    yours? (20
    points)

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Do you
    believe that
    intelligence
    can be
    measured in
    a way that is
    fair to
    everyone?
    Describe how
    you would
    assess
    abilities and
    potential
    fairly. (20
    points)

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Quality of
    Writing (15
    points)

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few MUGS

    11 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    mostly unclear
    and
    disorganized

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized

    Total Points: 80

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS). There
    is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e., use
    of own words
    and proper
    paraphrasing).
    Information from
    the Learning
    Resources is
    fully provided
    and correctly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    errors. Writing
    is original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    mostly
    provided and
    correctly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and
    reference(s) in
    correct APA
    style.

    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    mostly original
    (i.e., use of
    own words and
    proper
    paraphrasing)
    but may rely on
    the use of
    some direct
    quotations.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    provided
    and/or
    incorrectly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and/or
    citations(s) and
    reference(s) do
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    and/or
    contains many
    MUGS errors.
    There is an
    overuse of
    direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    significantly
    lacking and/or
    is incorrectly
    documented
    and/or
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    do not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse of
    directly
    quoted
    content.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    **Week2_LearningResources_Cross-CulturalPsychology-Spring2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week2-learningresources-cross-culturalpsychology-spring2025-pdf)

    **Week2_LearningResources_Cross-CulturalPsychology-Spring2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week2-learningresources-cross-culturalpsychology-spring2025-pdf)

    **## Week2_Assignment.pdf**

    Due Mar 9 by 10:59pm
    Points 80
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064

    In this week’s Learning Resources, there is a video with historical footage of immigrants arriving at Ellis
    Island in New York Harbor. If you have not viewed this video, stop and do so now—or watch it again, this
    time with the perspective of what it would feel like to be in that scene. You may have relatives that
    arrived through Ellis Island or a similar entry point in other parts of the country. Imagine being in that
    moment, having endured great hardship, and then facing a test that checks your intelligence—and for no
    small reason. It will determine whether you can enter the United States.

    Based on what you are learning about culture, is it likely that test would be fair in assessing the
    knowledge of those who speak languages other than English and have wildly different sets of
    experiences? Additionally, different cultures have different definitions of intelligence. Some cultures
    integrate movement and emotions into the concept of intelligence. Other cultures value analytical
    thinking. Still others highlight nonverbal communication. Sadly, many Ellis Island immigrants were
    labeled “feeble-minded” by extremely biased intelligence tests and, after all those hardships, were
    refused entry into America.

    You will return to the issue of bias by examining how intelligence tests can favor some cultures over
    others. Through the Learning Resources, you will experience two unique intelligence tests and imagine
    how you might do if each test had major stakes for you—such as whether you could vote, be accepted
    by a college, or be allowed to enter a country. Intelligence tests have been used for those and other
    purposes—and sometimes with the express purpose of excluding some groups over others.

    For this Assignment, you will examine how culture influences the perspective from which various people
    view the concept of “intelligence.” As you take the Chitling Test and Original Australian Test, you may find
    yourself wondering what some questions have to do with intelligence. Just remember, many tests
    throughout history have been based on the idea that there are things that “everyone” should know. When
    you take the Free IQ Test, you may find that the questions are more familiar, but is that just because of
    your cultural background?

    INTELLIGENCE

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064)

    Review the Learning Resources for this week, with particular attention to Chapter 5 in the course text
    and the media program on Ellis Island immigration.
    Access and complete the Free IQ Test found in the Learning Resources for this week. Note: This test
    is to be completed online. Make sure to save your results.
    Access and complete “The Original Australian Test of Intelligence” and “The Chitling Intelligence
    Test,” in the Learning Resources. Note: The tests cannot be filled in online. Use paper and pencil to
    record your answers, and then click the scoring sheet link to check your results.
    Consider how well you did on each test. What kind of knowledge was needed to do well, and how
    “common” is that knowledge? Consider questions in all three tests that stand out to you as examples
    of cultural bias.
    Based on your experience, consider what conclusions you can draw about the meaning of
    “intelligence” and “common knowledge” across cultures and the potential for constructing an
    intelligence test without cultural bias.
    Consider the various views of intelligence discussed in your Learning Resources and consider how
    they are similar or different from your own views.
    Keep in mind the goal of supporting your viewpoints with clear reasoning and evidence as noted in
    the Walden Writing Center resources. Consider how you can incorporate the use of evidence in your
    writing to further develop your scholarly writing skills.
    Review the Writing Center resources to understand APA style and the overall expectations of
    scholarly writing at Walden. Use the “Undergraduate Paper with Advice APA 7” course template for
    this Assignment.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067)

    TO PREPARE:

    ASSIGNMENT:

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067)

    PSYC_2001_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

    Write a 2-page paper that addresses the following components. Be sure to include references to
    Learning Resources, including media.

    Explain how immigrants at Ellis Island must have felt when presented with questions that may not
    have made any sense to them. (Note: After taking the Chitling and Australian tests, you may be able
    to relate.) Discuss whether or not you have ever felt that standardized tests did not accurately assess
    your abilities. Why or why not?
    Though many common standardized tests, including IQ tests, are considered to be dependable and
    valid, is it possible that they are biased simply because they were made with one cultural view of
    intelligence in mind? Further explain your thoughts on the issue of bias in intelligence testing based
    on your readings and activities this week.
    Compare your own view of intelligence with the various perspectives studied this week. What
    cultures have perspectives similar to yours?
    Do you believe that intelligence can be measured in a way that is fair to everyone? Describe how you
    would assess abilities and potential fairly.

    Support the responses within your assignment with credited evidence from the assigned learning
    resources (including sentence-level citations). Provide a reference list in APA Style for resources you
    used in the assignment.

    Submit your Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn+last
    name+first initial.

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    15 pts

    Explain how
    immigrants at
    Ellis Island
    must have felt
    when
    presented
    with
    questions that
    may not have
    made any
    sense to
    them.
    Discuss
    whether or
    not you have
    ever felt that
    standardized
    tests did not
    accurately
    assess your
    abilities. Why
    or why not?
    (10 points)

    10 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    8.5 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    7.5 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    6.5 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Is it possible
    that
    intelligence
    tests are
    biased simply
    because they
    were made
    with one
    cultural view
    of intelligence
    in mind?
    Further
    explain your
    thoughts on
    the issue of
    bias in
    intelligence
    testing. (15
    points)

    15 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    12 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    11 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    9 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    20 pts

    20 pts

    15 pts

    Compare
    your own
    view of
    intelligence
    with the
    various
    perspectives
    studied this
    week. What
    cultures have
    perspectives
    similar to
    yours? (20
    points)

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Do you
    believe that
    intelligence
    can be
    measured in
    a way that is
    fair to
    everyone?
    Describe how
    you would
    assess
    abilities and
    potential
    fairly. (20
    points)

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Quality of
    Writing (15
    points)

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few MUGS

    11 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    mostly unclear
    and
    disorganized

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized

    Total Points: 80

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS). There
    is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e., use
    of own words
    and proper
    paraphrasing).
    Information from
    the Learning
    Resources is
    fully provided
    and correctly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    errors. Writing
    is original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    mostly
    provided and
    correctly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and
    reference(s) in
    correct APA
    style.

    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    mostly original
    (i.e., use of
    own words and
    proper
    paraphrasing)
    but may rely on
    the use of
    some direct
    quotations.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    provided
    and/or
    incorrectly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and/or
    citations(s) and
    reference(s) do
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    and/or
    contains many
    MUGS errors.
    There is an
    overuse of
    direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    significantly
    lacking and/or
    is incorrectly
    documented
    and/or
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    do not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse of
    directly
    quoted
    content.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    **Week2_LearningResources_Cross-CulturalPsychology-Spring2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week2-learningresources-cross-culturalpsychology-spring2025-pdf)

    **## Week2_Assignment.pdf**

    Due Mar 9 by 10:59pm
    Points 80
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

    Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064

    In this week’s Learning Resources, there is a video with historical footage of immigrants arriving at Ellis
    Island in New York Harbor. If you have not viewed this video, stop and do so now—or watch it again, this
    time with the perspective of what it would feel like to be in that scene. You may have relatives that
    arrived through Ellis Island or a similar entry point in other parts of the country. Imagine being in that
    moment, having endured great hardship, and then facing a test that checks your intelligence—and for no
    small reason. It will determine whether you can enter the United States.

    Based on what you are learning about culture, is it likely that test would be fair in assessing the
    knowledge of those who speak languages other than English and have wildly different sets of
    experiences? Additionally, different cultures have different definitions of intelligence. Some cultures
    integrate movement and emotions into the concept of intelligence. Other cultures value analytical
    thinking. Still others highlight nonverbal communication. Sadly, many Ellis Island immigrants were
    labeled “feeble-minded” by extremely biased intelligence tests and, after all those hardships, were
    refused entry into America.

    You will return to the issue of bias by examining how intelligence tests can favor some cultures over
    others. Through the Learning Resources, you will experience two unique intelligence tests and imagine
    how you might do if each test had major stakes for you—such as whether you could vote, be accepted
    by a college, or be allowed to enter a country. Intelligence tests have been used for those and other
    purposes—and sometimes with the express purpose of excluding some groups over others.

    For this Assignment, you will examine how culture influences the perspective from which various people
    view the concept of “intelligence.” As you take the Chitling Test and Original Australian Test, you may find
    yourself wondering what some questions have to do with intelligence. Just remember, many tests
    throughout history have been based on the idea that there are things that “everyone” should know. When
    you take the Free IQ Test, you may find that the questions are more familiar, but is that just because of
    your cultural background?

    INTELLIGENCE

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184064)

    Review the Learning Resources for this week, with particular attention to Chapter 5 in the course text
    and the media program on Ellis Island immigration.
    Access and complete the Free IQ Test found in the Learning Resources for this week. Note: This test
    is to be completed online. Make sure to save your results.
    Access and complete “The Original Australian Test of Intelligence” and “The Chitling Intelligence
    Test,” in the Learning Resources. Note: The tests cannot be filled in online. Use paper and pencil to
    record your answers, and then click the scoring sheet link to check your results.
    Consider how well you did on each test. What kind of knowledge was needed to do well, and how
    “common” is that knowledge? Consider questions in all three tests that stand out to you as examples
    of cultural bias.
    Based on your experience, consider what conclusions you can draw about the meaning of
    “intelligence” and “common knowledge” across cultures and the potential for constructing an
    intelligence test without cultural bias.
    Consider the various views of intelligence discussed in your Learning Resources and consider how
    they are similar or different from your own views.
    Keep in mind the goal of supporting your viewpoints with clear reasoning and evidence as noted in
    the Walden Writing Center resources. Consider how you can incorporate the use of evidence in your
    writing to further develop your scholarly writing skills.
    Review the Writing Center resources to understand APA style and the overall expectations of
    scholarly writing at Walden. Use the “Undergraduate Paper with Advice APA 7” course template for
    this Assignment.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067)

    TO PREPARE:

    ASSIGNMENT:

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155407/modules/items/6184067)

    PSYC_2001_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

    Write a 2-page paper that addresses the following components. Be sure to include references to
    Learning Resources, including media.

    Explain how immigrants at Ellis Island must have felt when presented with questions that may not
    have made any sense to them. (Note: After taking the Chitling and Australian tests, you may be able
    to relate.) Discuss whether or not you have ever felt that standardized tests did not accurately assess
    your abilities. Why or why not?
    Though many common standardized tests, including IQ tests, are considered to be dependable and
    valid, is it possible that they are biased simply because they were made with one cultural view of
    intelligence in mind? Further explain your thoughts on the issue of bias in intelligence testing based
    on your readings and activities this week.
    Compare your own view of intelligence with the various perspectives studied this week. What
    cultures have perspectives similar to yours?
    Do you believe that intelligence can be measured in a way that is fair to everyone? Describe how you
    would assess abilities and potential fairly.

    Support the responses within your assignment with credited evidence from the assigned learning
    resources (including sentence-level citations). Provide a reference list in APA Style for resources you
    used in the assignment.

    Submit your Assignment.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn+last
    name+first initial.

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    10 pts

    15 pts

    Explain how
    immigrants at
    Ellis Island
    must have felt
    when
    presented
    with
    questions that
    may not have
    made any
    sense to
    them.
    Discuss
    whether or
    not you have
    ever felt that
    standardized
    tests did not
    accurately
    assess your
    abilities. Why
    or why not?
    (10 points)

    10 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    8.5 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    7.5 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    6.5 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Is it possible
    that
    intelligence
    tests are
    biased simply
    because they
    were made
    with one
    cultural view
    of intelligence
    in mind?
    Further
    explain your
    thoughts on
    the issue of
    bias in
    intelligence
    testing. (15
    points)

    15 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    12 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    11 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    9 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    20 pts

    20 pts

    15 pts

    Compare
    your own
    view of
    intelligence
    with the
    various
    perspectives
    studied this
    week. What
    cultures have
    perspectives
    similar to
    yours? (20
    points)

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Do you
    believe that
    intelligence
    can be
    measured in
    a way that is
    fair to
    everyone?
    Describe how
    you would
    assess
    abilities and
    potential
    fairly. (20
    points)

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains some
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete and/or
    is somewhat
    accurate;
    and/or does not
    contain
    sufficient details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes some
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete or
    not provided;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained;
    does not
    include
    credited
    supporting
    evidence from
    the Learning
    Resources.

    Quality of
    Writing (15
    points)

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few MUGS

    11 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    mostly unclear
    and
    disorganized

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized

    Total Points: 80

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS). There
    is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e., use
    of own words
    and proper
    paraphrasing).
    Information from
    the Learning
    Resources is
    fully provided
    and correctly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and reference(s)
    in correct APA
    style.

    errors. Writing
    is original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    mostly
    provided and
    correctly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and
    reference(s) in
    correct APA
    style.

    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    mostly original
    (i.e., use of
    own words and
    proper
    paraphrasing)
    but may rely on
    the use of
    some direct
    quotations.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    provided
    and/or
    incorrectly
    documented
    with citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s),
    and/or
    citations(s) and
    reference(s) do
    not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    and/or
    contains many
    MUGS errors.
    There is an
    overuse of
    direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    significantly
    lacking and/or
    is incorrectly
    documented
    and/or
    citation(s) and
    reference(s)
    do not follow
    correct APA
    style.

    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse of
    directly
    quoted
    content.
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    **Week2_LearningResources_Cross-CulturalPsychology-Spring2025.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week2-learningresources-cross-culturalpsychology-spring2025-pdf)

  • [Solved] Evaluating the selection process

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Week10AssignmentInstructions.docx **## Week10AssignmentInstructions.docx** **OVERVIEW** Your company's recruiting team collected candidate data on a test battery composed of several selection assessments or procedures. Your task is to review available information abo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week10AssignmentInstructions.docx

    **## Week10AssignmentInstructions.docx**

    **OVERVIEW**

    Your company's recruiting team collected candidate data on a test battery composed of several selection assessments or procedures. Your task is to review available information about the current selection process, evaluate the selection process to determine the extent to which it is meeting the organization's needs, provide your expert opinion on the extent to which the selection process is legally defensible, and offer recommendations for changes to the selection process. The outcome of this assignment is a technical report for the HR leaders in your organization.

    Note that there is no one best way to design a selection process, as multiple factors should be considered and judgment is involved. This assignment is intended to give you an opportunity to carefully consider several types of common challenges that arise with selection processes and to think through possible process improvements based on what you learned in the course. As such, your review and recommendations should be well reasoned and supported by the relevant scholarly sources (for example, the course text, peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and professional standards such as the SIOP "Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures").

    **INSTRUCTIONS**

    In a 5–7 page technical report:

    · State the purpose of the report and provide a brief description of the available information about the selection process that informed your evaluation (what type of information is available, when it was collected, et cetera.)

    · Evaluate the selection process with respect to the following, providing support from the scholarly literature and professional standards (for example, SIOP principles):

    · Job-relatedness: Evaluate the sufficiency of the available evidence to support the job-relatedness of each selection assessment.

    · Professional guidelines: What patterns are you observing based on the results? What is working well and what challenges are present with consideration to the following professional guidelines for selection procedures?

    · Validity: Prediction of important performance and business outcomes.

    · Legal defensibility: Adverse impact risk for protected groups (for example, women, candidates age 40 and older, or ethnic groups).

    · Candidate reactions (the candidate experience).

    · Practical considerations (for example, cost-benefit, or feedback from key stakeholders such as recruiters or hiring managers).

    · Make recommendations for the selection process, addressing each of the following questions posed by the business leaders:

    · Do you recommend retaining the assessment battery in its current form or making changes? Why?

    · If you would make any changes to the selection battery, provide recommendations for what you would retain and what changes or next steps you would take to address the challenges that you identified in your evaluation of the job-relatedness and professional guidelines for validity, adverse impact, the candidate experience, and practical considerations.

    · What changes, if any, would you recommend making to the way selection decisions are made based on the selection assessments (for example, top-down selection, multiple hurdle, or using cutoff scores)?

    · How do you anticipate your recommended changes will improve the alignment of the selection process with the organization's objectives?

    · Support your recommendations based on scholarly literature and professional standards for best practices in selection and assessment (for example, SIOP principles).

    Refer to the Evaluating the Selection Process rubric to examine the grading criteria on which your assignment will be evaluated.

    **Additional Requirements**

    Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Written communication**: Written communication is understandable to key stakeholders who do not have a background in I-O psychology.

    ·
    **APA format**: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format.

    ·
    **References**: At least five references in the technical report, at least one of which should be for a professional standard or guideline resource.

    ·
    **Length of technical report**: 5–7 pages, excluding the title page and references.

    ·
    **Font and font size**: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    ·
    **Line spacing**: 1.0–1.5.

    **## Week10AssignmentInstructions.docx**

    **OVERVIEW**

    Your company's recruiting team collected candidate data on a test battery composed of several selection assessments or procedures. Your task is to review available information about the current selection process, evaluate the selection process to determine the extent to which it is meeting the organization's needs, provide your expert opinion on the extent to which the selection process is legally defensible, and offer recommendations for changes to the selection process. The outcome of this assignment is a technical report for the HR leaders in your organization.

    Note that there is no one best way to design a selection process, as multiple factors should be considered and judgment is involved. This assignment is intended to give you an opportunity to carefully consider several types of common challenges that arise with selection processes and to think through possible process improvements based on what you learned in the course. As such, your review and recommendations should be well reasoned and supported by the relevant scholarly sources (for example, the course text, peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and professional standards such as the SIOP "Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures").

    **INSTRUCTIONS**

    In a 5–7 page technical report:

    · State the purpose of the report and provide a brief description of the available information about the selection process that informed your evaluation (what type of information is available, when it was collected, et cetera.)

    · Evaluate the selection process with respect to the following, providing support from the scholarly literature and professional standards (for example, SIOP principles):

    · Job-relatedness: Evaluate the sufficiency of the available evidence to support the job-relatedness of each selection assessment.

    · Professional guidelines: What patterns are you observing based on the results? What is working well and what challenges are present with consideration to the following professional guidelines for selection procedures?

    · Validity: Prediction of important performance and business outcomes.

    · Legal defensibility: Adverse impact risk for protected groups (for example, women, candidates age 40 and older, or ethnic groups).

    · Candidate reactions (the candidate experience).

    · Practical considerations (for example, cost-benefit, or feedback from key stakeholders such as recruiters or hiring managers).

    · Make recommendations for the selection process, addressing each of the following questions posed by the business leaders:

    · Do you recommend retaining the assessment battery in its current form or making changes? Why?

    · If you would make any changes to the selection battery, provide recommendations for what you would retain and what changes or next steps you would take to address the challenges that you identified in your evaluation of the job-relatedness and professional guidelines for validity, adverse impact, the candidate experience, and practical considerations.

    · What changes, if any, would you recommend making to the way selection decisions are made based on the selection assessments (for example, top-down selection, multiple hurdle, or using cutoff scores)?

    · How do you anticipate your recommended changes will improve the alignment of the selection process with the organization's objectives?

    · Support your recommendations based on scholarly literature and professional standards for best practices in selection and assessment (for example, SIOP principles).

    Refer to the Evaluating the Selection Process rubric to examine the grading criteria on which your assignment will be evaluated.

    **Additional Requirements**

    Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Written communication**: Written communication is understandable to key stakeholders who do not have a background in I-O psychology.

    ·
    **APA format**: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format.

    ·
    **References**: At least five references in the technical report, at least one of which should be for a professional standard or guideline resource.

    ·
    **Length of technical report**: 5–7 pages, excluding the title page and references.

    ·
    **Font and font size**: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    ·
    **Line spacing**: 1.0–1.5.

  • [Solved] B29 IDR W8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    review for edits – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    review for edits

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] B08 CDP W8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    review for edits – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    review for edits

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] OBM Class

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This week you will present an overview of your behavior action plan, coaching plan, any updates to your topic from the last presentation, and assessment results, and any barriers that have or are projected to arise. There should be a minimum of one slide for each of the above topics, but likely may …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This week you will present an overview of your behavior action plan, coaching plan, any updates to your topic from the last presentation, and assessment results, and any barriers that have or are projected to arise.

    There should be a minimum of one slide for each of the above topics, but likely may have more than one.

    Complete the attached consent and submit.

    [OBM 509 Project Consent Form (2).docx](https://canvas.endicott.edu/courses/52275/files/6102997?wrap=1 "OBM 509 Project Consent Form (2).docx") [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=13377&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2Fb877b70b-56d3-472f-9f56-c4b5e0150218%2FOBM%2520509%2520Project%2520Consent%2520Form%2520%25282%2529.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3NDA5MjM1NDQsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzL2I4NzdiNzBiLTU2ZDMtNDcyZi05ZjU2LWM0YjVlMDE1MDIxOC9PQk0lMjA1MDklMjBQcm9qZWN0JTIwQ29uc2VudCUyMEZvcm0lMjAlMjgyJTI5LmRvY3giLCJqdGkiOiJkM2IxY2YzNi1lYzk2LTQxZGYtYmE1YS1jZWYyZmM4YjFkOTIiLCJob3N0IjpudWxsLCJleHAiOjE3NDEwMDk5NDR9.4e4nWUDnMRoybpVe7N_WDkAthXm-N3oD2hYewHzDQkvx4LuvgnvXPsV3hs1zK0-yrpDTrU2IzafX-HzfQ3gzdw "Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader")

    Complete the coaching plan that was presented in the Lattal & Porritt, 2008 article. Complete this so it applies to your project's topic.

    [OBM 509-Coaching Action Plan (1) (1).docx](https://canvas.endicott.edu/courses/52275/files/6102996?wrap=1 "OBM 509-Coaching Action Plan (1) (1).docx") [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=13377&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2Fbb4041d4-a587-40bb-aecb-384d31742146%2FOBM%2520509-Coaching%2520Action%2520Plan%2520%25281%2529%2520%25281%2529.docx%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3NDA5MDk1NjYsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzL2JiNDA0MWQ0LWE1ODctNDBiYi1hZWNiLTM4NGQzMTc0MjE0Ni9PQk0lMjA1MDktQ29hY2hpbmclMjBBY3Rpb24lMjBQbGFuJTIwJTI4MSUyOSUyMCUyODElMjkuZG9jeCIsImp0aSI6Ijk5MGZhYWQ2LWY0NjQtNGJiNy1hMzM3LTkxMDQwMTI4ZWExMSIsImhvc3QiOm51bGwsImV4cCI6MTc0MDk5NTk2Nn0.mF9rOlMpU7yPQRdUrzw3_4DG_9wQFGhBoovsjx8nWOpuXsLqZLMC_pQc2AQqfkhV4RkysrvNfpj-fdxHMEMVyQ "Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader")

    Complete the behavior action plan that was presented in the Lattal & Porritt, 2008 article. Complete this so it applied to your project's topic.

    [Behavior Action Plan Lattal_Porritt_2008_.docx](https://canvas.endicott.edu/courses/52275/files/6103000?wrap=1 "Behavior Action Plan Lattal_Porritt_2008_.docx")

    Write an at least one page reflection on the organization's reaction to:

    – Topic Proposal
    – Assessment and Findings
    – Behavior Action Plan
    – Coaching Action Plan
    – Intervention Proposal

    – [\
    \
    OBM509ProjectConsentForm21.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/obm509projectconsentform21-docx-10212965 "OBM509ProjectConsentForm21.docx")
    – [\
    \
    OBM509-CoachingActionPlan111.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/obm509-coachingactionplan111-docx-10212967 "OBM509-CoachingActionPlan111.docx")
    – [\
    \
    BehaviorActionPlanLattal_Porritt_2008_1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/behavioractionplanlattal-porritt-2008-1-docx "BehaviorActionPlanLattal_Porritt_2008_1.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] AQR&A Assignment 2 Week 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare for this Assignment:** – Review this week’s Learning Resources and media program related to multiple regression. For this Assignment, you will critically evaluate a scholarly article related to multiple regression.You will note that the journal article critique assignment is similar to …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare for this Assignment:**

    – Review this week’s Learning Resources and media program related to multiple regression.

    For this Assignment, you will critically evaluate a scholarly article related to multiple regression.You will note that the journal article critique assignment is similar to those you did in the Quantitative Reasoning and Analysis course in weeks 9 and 10. You should not turn in the paper you submitted in the earlier course. Please note that SafeAssign will match your assignment to your submission(s) from the earlier course and it is not permissible to reuse work from previous courses without specific permission from your instructor.For this assignment you need to choose an article where the authors used multiple regression that you have not used before in a journal article critique assignment.Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing for your analysis, research question, and display of output.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] AQR&A Assignment 1 Week 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare for this Assignment:** – Review this week’s Learning Resources and media program related to multiple regression. – Based on the dataset you chose, construct a research question that can be answered with a multiple regression analysis. Write a 1- to 2-page analysis of your multiple regre…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare for this Assignment:**

    – Review this week’s Learning Resources and media program related to multiple regression.
    – Based on the dataset you chose, construct a research question that can be answered with a multiple regression analysis.

    Write a 1- to 2-page analysis of your multiple regression results, addressing each research question. In your analysis, display the data for the output. Based on your results, provide an explanation of what the implications of social change might be.

    Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing for your analysis, research question, and display of output.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] psych 110

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## psych110.docx **## psych110.docx** **Assignment Instructions (Ma)** **Assignment Title: Creating an Informational Flyer on False Memory and Eyewitness Testimony** **Objective**: To help students understand the complexities of memory and the implications of eyewitness…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## psych110.docx

    **## psych110.docx**

    **Assignment Instructions (Ma)**

    **Assignment Title: Creating an Informational Flyer on False Memory and Eyewitness Testimony**

    **Objective**:

    To help students understand the complexities of memory and the implications of eyewitness testimony, as well as to highlight the importance of accurately assessing these elements in the justice system.

    **Background**:

    In this assignment, you'll use insights from the "60 Minutes" segment on Ronald Cotton to create an informational flyer aimed at educating judges and juries about false memories and eyewitness testimony. Ronald Cotton’s story is a compelling case study on the impact of mistaken identity and the fallibility of human memory in the legal system.

    **Instructions**:

    Watch the 60 Minutes Segment:

    Watch
    **both** parts of the "60 Minutes" segment on Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson. This is a legal case that happened right here in NC, and resulted in legal changes in how you will be interviewed by law enforcement. This can typically be found online through streaming services or on the official "60 Minutes" website. Here is a link:
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-SBTRLoPuo](https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Du-SBTRLoPuo&data=05%7C02%7Cgilbreav%40faytechcc.edu%7Cedb9717dc5fa4da64ccb08dcb6e47fb3%7Cb875192e74554fee883880bcbc7a894b%7C0%7C0%7C638586339726587981%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9DE4chEUteJRr4Yz625er0maXPBjpY41sabqdgX2%2Ftw%3D&reserved=0)

    **Research and Understand the Concepts:**

    Review key concepts related to memory, including false memories, the malleability of eyewitness accounts, and the psychological factors that can affect testimony.

    Look into relevant research studies and psychological theories that pertain to memory accuracy and witness reliability.

    **Create an Informational Flyer:**

    **## psych110.docx**

    **Assignment Instructions (Ma)**

    **Assignment Title: Creating an Informational Flyer on False Memory and Eyewitness Testimony**

    **Objective**:

    To help students understand the complexities of memory and the implications of eyewitness testimony, as well as to highlight the importance of accurately assessing these elements in the justice system.

    **Background**:

    In this assignment, you'll use insights from the "60 Minutes" segment on Ronald Cotton to create an informational flyer aimed at educating judges and juries about false memories and eyewitness testimony. Ronald Cotton’s story is a compelling case study on the impact of mistaken identity and the fallibility of human memory in the legal system.

    **Instructions**:

    Watch the 60 Minutes Segment:

    Watch
    **both** parts of the "60 Minutes" segment on Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson. This is a legal case that happened right here in NC, and resulted in legal changes in how you will be interviewed by law enforcement. This can typically be found online through streaming services or on the official "60 Minutes" website. Here is a link:
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-SBTRLoPuo](https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Du-SBTRLoPuo&data=05%7C02%7Cgilbreav%40faytechcc.edu%7Cedb9717dc5fa4da64ccb08dcb6e47fb3%7Cb875192e74554fee883880bcbc7a894b%7C0%7C0%7C638586339726587981%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9DE4chEUteJRr4Yz625er0maXPBjpY41sabqdgX2%2Ftw%3D&reserved=0)

    **Research and Understand the Concepts:**

    Review key concepts related to memory, including false memories, the malleability of eyewitness accounts, and the psychological factors that can affect testimony.

    Look into relevant research studies and psychological theories that pertain to memory accuracy and witness reliability.

    **Create an Informational Flyer:**

  • [Solved] part a, b, c case study red

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## CaseStudy7-Kohls11.pdf – ## AdverseImpact3.2.pdf – ## cedwk7.docx **## CaseStudy7-Kohls11.pdf** Kohl's fired 3 employees for violating store's policy BY MEREDITH BONNY TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER Friday, April 15, 2005 Rikki Groves wasn't the only employee fired from…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## CaseStudy7-Kohls11.pdf

    – ## AdverseImpact3.2.pdf

    – ## cedwk7.docx

    **## CaseStudy7-Kohls11.pdf**

    Kohl's fired 3 employees for violating store's policy
    BY MEREDITH BONNY
    TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
    Friday, April 15, 2005

    Rikki Groves wasn't the only employee fired from the Kohl's
    department store in Mechanicsville and asked to pay
    restitution for reusing coupons and passing the savings on to
    customers.

    Rebecca Hagen, 20, of Sandston and Katie Kombacher, 21, of
    Mechanicsville said they were also interrogated,
    photographed and asked to sign documents barring them
    from returning to the store or shopping there after they were
    told they misused coupons.

    "I was pretty mad about the situation," Hagen said. Kombacher said her firing was "a
    big ordeal." She said store officials "made me walk through the store while I was
    crying."

    All three women are looking for new jobs.

    Earlier this week, The Times-Dispatch ran a story reporting what had happened to
    Groves.

    Dozens of people responded. The newspaper received more than 50 e-mails and
    about 40 phone calls, complaining about the way Groves was treated. Hagen and
    Kombacher contacted The Times-Dispatch after the story ran.

    Many readers who
    contacted The Times-
    Dispatch said they planned
    to call the store's corporate
    office to say they would
    never shop at a Kohl's
    again. Others said they cut
    up their Kohl's credit cards.

    A few questioned why the
    newspaper ran the story,
    calling the incident minor.

    When they were dismissed
    from the store, all three
    women were told they

    would have to repay the store for discounts taken with the extra use of the coupons.
    Hagen said store officials "told me if I did not pay, I would have been arrested for
    embezzlement."

    RELATED
    AUDIO: Rikki Groves,
    former Kohl's employee

    Kohl's worker fired over
    coupons

    Kohl's fired 3 employees for
    violating store's policy

    Groves said she was told she owed the store $1,000. The evening before the first
    story went to press, Lori Sansoucie, a spokeswoman at Kohl's headquarters in
    Menomonee Falls, Wis., said that while Groves violated company policy, the store
    would not require her to pay back the $1,000.

    At that time, Groves had already paid the store $100 and was scheduled to pay $150
    each month for the next six months.

    She has since received a $100 check in the mail from the store.

    Hagen, who had been asked to pay $214, and Kombacher, who had been asked to
    pay $600, said they have also gotten their money back.

    Sansoucie yesterday confirmed that three employees had been fired for the same
    "policy infringement," but she would not comment on the way the women said they
    were treated.

    Groves, Hagen and Kombacher all said that they were originally told by a security
    employee there that they could be arrested if they did not pay the money back.
    However, a Henrico County police spokesman told The Times-Dispatch that to his
    knowledge the matter in question was not a crime and rather an internal store-policy
    matter.

    The controversy stemmed from a recent "friends and family sale" at the store.

    Groves said Kohl's employees received 15-percent-off coupons in the mail — one for
    their use and 10 for family and friends.

    All three former employees said they had extra coupons and in some cases were
    reusing them at their registers. They said they were not told what they were doing
    was wrong until it was too late.

    "I don't think I was treated fairly," Kombacher said.

    Looking back, Groves said that while she is glad she won't have to pay back the
    $1,000, she's still angry at how Kohl's handled the issue.

    "I never received an apology," Groves said. "But at least now I know for sure now
    that they were wrong."

    Contact Meredith Bonny at (804) 649-6452 or mbonny@timesdispatch.com

    This story can be found at:
    http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD/MGArticle/RTD_Bas
    icArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031782158244

    **## AdverseImpact3.2.pdf**

    ��

    ([HUFLVH�����
    'HWHUPLQLQJ�$GYHUVH�,PSDFW

    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB�

    ������ )RU�VHYHUDO�\HDUV��'H[WHU¶V�.QLIH�&RPSDQ\�UHTXLUHG�WKDW�DOO�HPSOR\HHV�KLUHG�IRU�TXDOLW\�FRQWURO�SRVLWLRQV�
    LQ� WKHLU� SURGXFWLRQ� IDFLOLW\� LQ� 0LDPL� KDYH� DW� OHDVW� WZR� \HDUV� RI� FROOHJH�� � 7KH� FRPSDQ\
    V� MXVWLILFDWLRQ� IRU� WKLV�
    UHTXLUHPHQW�LV�WKDW�EHFDXVH�WKHLU�FDVKLHUV�PXVW�DGG�SULFHV�LQ�WKHLU�KHDG��WKH\�QHHG�WR�EH�HGXFDWHG���(YHQ�WKRXJK�WKH\�
    DUH�WKH�RQO\�SURGXFWLRQ�IDFLOLW\�ZLWK�WKLV�UHTXLUHPHQW��WKH\�DUH�DEOH�WR�DWWUDFW�PDQ\�DSSOLFDQWV�EHFDXVH�WKH\�SD\����
    DQ�KRXU�PRUH�WKDQ�DQ\�RWKHU�PDQXIDFWXUHU��

    ������ 9DOHULH�&DVWLOOR�DSSOLHG�IRU�D�MRE�ZLWK�'H[WHU¶V�DQG�ZDV�QRW�KLUHG�EHFDXVH�VKH�KDG�QHYHU�DWWHQGHG�FROOHJH���
    0V��&DVWLOOR��D�+LVSDQLF�ZRPDQ��ILOHG�FKDUJHV�RI�GLVFULPLQDWLRQ�ZLWK�WKH�((2&�� �2Q�WKH�EDVLV�RI� WKH�IDFWV�VWDWHG�
    DERYH��DV�ZHOO�DV� WKH�GDWD�EHORZ��ZLOO� WKH�((2&�LQYHVWLJDWLRQ�UHYHDO�DGYHUVH� LPSDFW�RQ� WKH�EDVLV�RI�HLWKHU�VH[�RU�
    UDFH"�$VVXPH�WKDW�DQ\�DSSOLFDQW�ZLWK�WZR�RU�PRUH�\HDUV�RI�FROOHJH�ZDV�KLUHG��

    $SSOLFDQW� 6H[� (WKQLFLW\� <HDUV�RI�&ROOHJH�
    0LNH�'RQRYDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    -DPLH�-DZRUVNL� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    0DWW�&KDPEHUV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    -RUJH�&DVWLOOR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    9DOHULH�&DVWLOOR� )HPDOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    6DQWRV�-LPLQH]� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -RVH�*DU]D� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -XDQ�5LQH]� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    $OH[�7LPPRQV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    *HQH�0DUVKDOO� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &LQG\�/DQGRQ� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    (PPHWW�0HULGLDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    %ULDQ�0RVHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    5RJHU�+LFNV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    5REHUW�7KDFKHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    0DUFXV�:KLWH� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    2VFDU�6RWD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -RVHSK�6DSHGD� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    .HQ�2OVHQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    (VWHEDQ�)DPRVD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    7HR�)DPRVD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    /LOD�:HVW� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    2VFDU�3UDGR� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    )UHG��)UHHER��%RZPDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    1DWKDQ�0DUWLQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    /LWWOH�&KLQR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    (WKDQ�7XUQHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &OHPVRQ�*DOW� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &DPLOOD�)LJJ� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    0LJXHO�3UDGR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��

    ������&HQJDJH�/HDUQLQJ��$OO�5LJKWV�5HVHUYHG��0D\�QRW�EH�VFDQQHG��FRSLHG��RU�GXSOLFDWHG��RU�SRVWHG�WR�D�SXEOLFO\�DFFHVVLEOH�ZHEVLWH��LQ�ZKROH�RU�LQ�SDUW�

    **## cedwk7.docx**

    **Part A**

    **(CHP 7) Kohl's Department Store Case Study () THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND ONLINE, I DON’T HAVE THE TEXTBOOK, SO ANSWER THE BEST YOU CAN**

    After reading the relevant chapter sections and the case study on page 268. Please address the following questions:

    1. How could the store have better handled the termination?

    2. Should the three employees have been fired?

    3. What could Kohl's have done to have prevented the situation in the first place?

    4. What could have the employees have done differently?

    **Additional Info—–>** [**Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719?wrap=1) [**Download Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719/download?download_frd=1) **<——Additional Info**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    1.
    **Initial Reply/Post:**
          o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.
          o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.
          o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.


    **Part B**

    **(CHP3A) BFOQ Hooter's Forum**

    **After reviewing the Hooter's video please provide 1) your thoughts and opinions on the video, and 2) comment of the video being sure to include how the content in this video relates to chapter 3's concept of BFOQ (see p. 92).**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    **1. Initial Reply/Post:**
    **o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.**
    **o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.**
    **o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.**

    **PART C**

    **Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact**

    ·
    **Submitting a text entry box**

    **Using the document provided in the Module section of the course labeled** [**"Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?wrap=1) [**Download "Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?download_frd=1) **you are to determine if an EEOC investigation will reveal adverse impact on the basis of either 1) sex or 2) race? Assume that any applicant with two or more years of college was hired.**

    **You should carefully review the example provided on pages 94-95, paying close attention to table 3.2 on page 95 of your text.**

    **For both 1) Sex and 2) Race you should provide the following information like presented below for both sex and race.**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |
    | | **Males** | **Females** |
    | **Number of Applicants** | **A** | **B** |
    | **Numbered Hired** | **C** | **D** |
    | **Selection Ratio** | **C/A** | **D/B** |

    **Adverse Impact Calculation = (D/B) / (C/A) = X, IF X < .80 THEN ADVERSE IMPACT**

    **## cedwk7.docx**

    **Part A**

    **(CHP 7) Kohl's Department Store Case Study () THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND ONLINE, I DON’T HAVE THE TEXTBOOK, SO ANSWER THE BEST YOU CAN**

    After reading the relevant chapter sections and the case study on page 268. Please address the following questions:

    1. How could the store have better handled the termination?

    2. Should the three employees have been fired?

    3. What could Kohl's have done to have prevented the situation in the first place?

    4. What could have the employees have done differently?

    **Additional Info—–>** [**Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719?wrap=1) [**Download Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719/download?download_frd=1) **<——Additional Info**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    1.
    **Initial Reply/Post:**
          o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.
          o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.
          o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.


    **Part B**

    **(CHP3A) BFOQ Hooter's Forum**

    **After reviewing the Hooter's video please provide 1) your thoughts and opinions on the video, and 2) comment of the video being sure to include how the content in this video relates to chapter 3's concept of BFOQ (see p. 92).**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    **1. Initial Reply/Post:**
    **o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.**
    **o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.**
    **o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.**

    **PART C**

    **Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact**

    ·
    **Submitting a text entry box**

    **Using the document provided in the Module section of the course labeled** [**"Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?wrap=1) [**Download "Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?download_frd=1) **you are to determine if an EEOC investigation will reveal adverse impact on the basis of either 1) sex or 2) race? Assume that any applicant with two or more years of college was hired.**

    **You should carefully review the example provided on pages 94-95, paying close attention to table 3.2 on page 95 of your text.**

    **For both 1) Sex and 2) Race you should provide the following information like presented below for both sex and race.**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |
    | | **Males** | **Females** |
    | **Number of Applicants** | **A** | **B** |
    | **Numbered Hired** | **C** | **D** |
    | **Selection Ratio** | **C/A** | **D/B** |

    **Adverse Impact Calculation = (D/B) / (C/A) = X, IF X < .80 THEN ADVERSE IMPACT**

    **## CaseStudy7-Kohls11.pdf**

    Kohl's fired 3 employees for violating store's policy
    BY MEREDITH BONNY
    TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
    Friday, April 15, 2005


    Rikki Groves wasn't the only employee fired from the Kohl's
    department store in Mechanicsville and asked to pay
    restitution for reusing coupons and passing the savings on to
    customers.

    Rebecca Hagen, 20, of Sandston and Katie Kombacher, 21, of
    Mechanicsville said they were also interrogated,
    photographed and asked to sign documents barring them
    from returning to the store or shopping there after they were
    told they misused coupons.

    "I was pretty mad about the situation," Hagen said. Kombacher said her firing was "a
    big ordeal." She said store officials "made me walk through the store while I was
    crying."

    All three women are looking for new jobs.

    Earlier this week, The Times-Dispatch ran a story reporting what had happened to
    Groves.

    Dozens of people responded. The newspaper received more than 50 e-mails and
    about 40 phone calls, complaining about the way Groves was treated. Hagen and
    Kombacher contacted The Times-Dispatch after the story ran.

    Many readers who
    contacted The Times-
    Dispatch said they planned
    to call the store's corporate
    office to say they would
    never shop at a Kohl's
    again. Others said they cut
    up their Kohl's credit cards.

    A few questioned why the
    newspaper ran the story,
    calling the incident minor.

    When they were dismissed
    from the store, all three
    women were told they

    would have to repay the store for discounts taken with the extra use of the coupons.
    Hagen said store officials "told me if I did not pay, I would have been arrested for
    embezzlement."

    RELATED
    AUDIO: Rikki Groves,
    former Kohl's employee

    Kohl's worker fired over
    coupons

    Kohl's fired 3 employees for
    violating store's policy

    Groves said she was told she owed the store $1,000. The evening before the first
    story went to press, Lori Sansoucie, a spokeswoman at Kohl's headquarters in
    Menomonee Falls, Wis., said that while Groves violated company policy, the store
    would not require her to pay back the $1,000.

    At that time, Groves had already paid the store $100 and was scheduled to pay $150
    each month for the next six months.

    She has since received a $100 check in the mail from the store.

    Hagen, who had been asked to pay $214, and Kombacher, who had been asked to
    pay $600, said they have also gotten their money back.

    Sansoucie yesterday confirmed that three employees had been fired for the same
    "policy infringement," but she would not comment on the way the women said they
    were treated.

    Groves, Hagen and Kombacher all said that they were originally told by a security
    employee there that they could be arrested if they did not pay the money back.
    However, a Henrico County police spokesman told The Times-Dispatch that to his
    knowledge the matter in question was not a crime and rather an internal store-policy
    matter.

    The controversy stemmed from a recent "friends and family sale" at the store.

    Groves said Kohl's employees received 15-percent-off coupons in the mail — one for
    their use and 10 for family and friends.

    All three former employees said they had extra coupons and in some cases were
    reusing them at their registers. They said they were not told what they were doing
    was wrong until it was too late.

    "I don't think I was treated fairly," Kombacher said.

    Looking back, Groves said that while she is glad she won't have to pay back the
    $1,000, she's still angry at how Kohl's handled the issue.

    "I never received an apology," Groves said. "But at least now I know for sure now
    that they were wrong."


    Contact Meredith Bonny at (804) 649-6452 or mbonny@timesdispatch.com

    This story can be found at:
    http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD/MGArticle/RTD_Bas
    icArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031782158244

    **## AdverseImpact3.2.pdf**

    ��

    ([HUFLVH�����
    'HWHUPLQLQJ�$GYHUVH�,PSDFW

    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB�

    ������ )RU�VHYHUDO�\HDUV��'H[WHU¶V�.QLIH�&RPSDQ\�UHTXLUHG�WKDW�DOO�HPSOR\HHV�KLUHG�IRU�TXDOLW\�FRQWURO�SRVLWLRQV�
    LQ� WKHLU� SURGXFWLRQ� IDFLOLW\� LQ� 0LDPL� KDYH� DW� OHDVW� WZR� \HDUV� RI� FROOHJH�� � 7KH� FRPSDQ\
    V� MXVWLILFDWLRQ� IRU� WKLV�
    UHTXLUHPHQW�LV�WKDW�EHFDXVH�WKHLU�FDVKLHUV�PXVW�DGG�SULFHV�LQ�WKHLU�KHDG��WKH\�QHHG�WR�EH�HGXFDWHG���(YHQ�WKRXJK�WKH\�
    DUH�WKH�RQO\�SURGXFWLRQ�IDFLOLW\�ZLWK�WKLV�UHTXLUHPHQW��WKH\�DUH�DEOH�WR�DWWUDFW�PDQ\�DSSOLFDQWV�EHFDXVH�WKH\�SD\����
    DQ�KRXU�PRUH�WKDQ�DQ\�RWKHU�PDQXIDFWXUHU��

    ������ 9DOHULH�&DVWLOOR�DSSOLHG�IRU�D�MRE�ZLWK�'H[WHU¶V�DQG�ZDV�QRW�KLUHG�EHFDXVH�VKH�KDG�QHYHU�DWWHQGHG�FROOHJH���
    0V��&DVWLOOR��D�+LVSDQLF�ZRPDQ��ILOHG�FKDUJHV�RI�GLVFULPLQDWLRQ�ZLWK�WKH�((2&�� �2Q�WKH�EDVLV�RI� WKH�IDFWV�VWDWHG�
    DERYH��DV�ZHOO�DV� WKH�GDWD�EHORZ��ZLOO� WKH�((2&�LQYHVWLJDWLRQ�UHYHDO�DGYHUVH� LPSDFW�RQ� WKH�EDVLV�RI�HLWKHU�VH[�RU�
    UDFH"�$VVXPH�WKDW�DQ\�DSSOLFDQW�ZLWK�WZR�RU�PRUH�\HDUV�RI�FROOHJH�ZDV�KLUHG��

    $SSOLFDQW� 6H[� (WKQLFLW\� <HDUV�RI�&ROOHJH�
    0LNH�'RQRYDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    -DPLH�-DZRUVNL� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    0DWW�&KDPEHUV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    -RUJH�&DVWLOOR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    9DOHULH�&DVWLOOR� )HPDOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    6DQWRV�-LPLQH]� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -RVH�*DU]D� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -XDQ�5LQH]� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    $OH[�7LPPRQV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    *HQH�0DUVKDOO� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &LQG\�/DQGRQ� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    (PPHWW�0HULGLDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    %ULDQ�0RVHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    5RJHU�+LFNV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    5REHUW�7KDFKHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    0DUFXV�:KLWH� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    2VFDU�6RWD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -RVHSK�6DSHGD� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    .HQ�2OVHQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    (VWHEDQ�)DPRVD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    7HR�)DPRVD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    /LOD�:HVW� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    2VFDU�3UDGR� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    )UHG��)UHHER��%RZPDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    1DWKDQ�0DUWLQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    /LWWOH�&KLQR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    (WKDQ�7XUQHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &OHPVRQ�*DOW� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &DPLOOD�)LJJ� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    0LJXHO�3UDGR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��

    ������&HQJDJH�/HDUQLQJ��$OO�5LJKWV�5HVHUYHG��0D\�QRW�EH�VFDQQHG��FRSLHG��RU�GXSOLFDWHG��RU�SRVWHG�WR�D�SXEOLFO\�DFFHVVLEOH�ZHEVLWH��LQ�ZKROH�RU�LQ�SDUW�

    **## cedwk7.docx**

    **Part A**

    **(CHP 7) Kohl's Department Store Case Study () THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND ONLINE, I DON’T HAVE THE TEXTBOOK, SO ANSWER THE BEST YOU CAN**

    After reading the relevant chapter sections and the case study on page 268. Please address the following questions:

    1. How could the store have better handled the termination?

    2. Should the three employees have been fired?

    3. What could Kohl's have done to have prevented the situation in the first place?

    4. What could have the employees have done differently?

    **Additional Info—–>** [**Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719?wrap=1) [**Download Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719/download?download_frd=1) **<——Additional Info**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    1.
    **Initial Reply/Post:**
          o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.
          o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.
          o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.


    **Part B**

    **(CHP3A) BFOQ Hooter's Forum**

    **After reviewing the Hooter's video please provide 1) your thoughts and opinions on the video, and 2) comment of the video being sure to include how the content in this video relates to chapter 3's concept of BFOQ (see p. 92).**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    **1. Initial Reply/Post:**
    **o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.**
    **o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.**
    **o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.**

    **PART C**

    **Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact**

    ·
    **Submitting a text entry box**

    **Using the document provided in the Module section of the course labeled** [**"Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?wrap=1) [**Download "Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?download_frd=1) **you are to determine if an EEOC investigation will reveal adverse impact on the basis of either 1) sex or 2) race? Assume that any applicant with two or more years of college was hired.**

    **You should carefully review the example provided on pages 94-95, paying close attention to table 3.2 on page 95 of your text.**

    **For both 1) Sex and 2) Race you should provide the following information like presented below for both sex and race.**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |
    | | **Males** | **Females** |
    | **Number of Applicants** | **A** | **B** |
    | **Numbered Hired** | **C** | **D** |
    | **Selection Ratio** | **C/A** | **D/B** |

    **Adverse Impact Calculation = (D/B) / (C/A) = X, IF X < .80 THEN ADVERSE IMPACT**

    **## CaseStudy7-Kohls11.pdf**

    Kohl's fired 3 employees for violating store's policy
    BY MEREDITH BONNY
    TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
    Friday, April 15, 2005


    Rikki Groves wasn't the only employee fired from the Kohl's
    department store in Mechanicsville and asked to pay
    restitution for reusing coupons and passing the savings on to
    customers.

    Rebecca Hagen, 20, of Sandston and Katie Kombacher, 21, of
    Mechanicsville said they were also interrogated,
    photographed and asked to sign documents barring them
    from returning to the store or shopping there after they were
    told they misused coupons.

    "I was pretty mad about the situation," Hagen said. Kombacher said her firing was "a
    big ordeal." She said store officials "made me walk through the store while I was
    crying."

    All three women are looking for new jobs.

    Earlier this week, The Times-Dispatch ran a story reporting what had happened to
    Groves.

    Dozens of people responded. The newspaper received more than 50 e-mails and
    about 40 phone calls, complaining about the way Groves was treated. Hagen and
    Kombacher contacted The Times-Dispatch after the story ran.

    Many readers who
    contacted The Times-
    Dispatch said they planned
    to call the store's corporate
    office to say they would
    never shop at a Kohl's
    again. Others said they cut
    up their Kohl's credit cards.

    A few questioned why the
    newspaper ran the story,
    calling the incident minor.

    When they were dismissed
    from the store, all three
    women were told they

    would have to repay the store for discounts taken with the extra use of the coupons.
    Hagen said store officials "told me if I did not pay, I would have been arrested for
    embezzlement."

    RELATED
    AUDIO: Rikki Groves,
    former Kohl's employee

    Kohl's worker fired over
    coupons

    Kohl's fired 3 employees for
    violating store's policy

    Groves said she was told she owed the store $1,000. The evening before the first
    story went to press, Lori Sansoucie, a spokeswoman at Kohl's headquarters in
    Menomonee Falls, Wis., said that while Groves violated company policy, the store
    would not require her to pay back the $1,000.

    At that time, Groves had already paid the store $100 and was scheduled to pay $150
    each month for the next six months.

    She has since received a $100 check in the mail from the store.

    Hagen, who had been asked to pay $214, and Kombacher, who had been asked to
    pay $600, said they have also gotten their money back.

    Sansoucie yesterday confirmed that three employees had been fired for the same
    "policy infringement," but she would not comment on the way the women said they
    were treated.

    Groves, Hagen and Kombacher all said that they were originally told by a security
    employee there that they could be arrested if they did not pay the money back.
    However, a Henrico County police spokesman told The Times-Dispatch that to his
    knowledge the matter in question was not a crime and rather an internal store-policy
    matter.

    The controversy stemmed from a recent "friends and family sale" at the store.

    Groves said Kohl's employees received 15-percent-off coupons in the mail — one for
    their use and 10 for family and friends.

    All three former employees said they had extra coupons and in some cases were
    reusing them at their registers. They said they were not told what they were doing
    was wrong until it was too late.

    "I don't think I was treated fairly," Kombacher said.

    Looking back, Groves said that while she is glad she won't have to pay back the
    $1,000, she's still angry at how Kohl's handled the issue.

    "I never received an apology," Groves said. "But at least now I know for sure now
    that they were wrong."


    Contact Meredith Bonny at (804) 649-6452 or mbonny@timesdispatch.com

    This story can be found at:
    http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD/MGArticle/RTD_Bas
    icArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031782158244

    **## AdverseImpact3.2.pdf**

    ��

    ([HUFLVH�����
    'HWHUPLQLQJ�$GYHUVH�,PSDFW

    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB�

    ������ )RU�VHYHUDO�\HDUV��'H[WHU¶V�.QLIH�&RPSDQ\�UHTXLUHG�WKDW�DOO�HPSOR\HHV�KLUHG�IRU�TXDOLW\�FRQWURO�SRVLWLRQV�
    LQ� WKHLU� SURGXFWLRQ� IDFLOLW\� LQ� 0LDPL� KDYH� DW� OHDVW� WZR� \HDUV� RI� FROOHJH�� � 7KH� FRPSDQ\
    V� MXVWLILFDWLRQ� IRU� WKLV�
    UHTXLUHPHQW�LV�WKDW�EHFDXVH�WKHLU�FDVKLHUV�PXVW�DGG�SULFHV�LQ�WKHLU�KHDG��WKH\�QHHG�WR�EH�HGXFDWHG���(YHQ�WKRXJK�WKH\�
    DUH�WKH�RQO\�SURGXFWLRQ�IDFLOLW\�ZLWK�WKLV�UHTXLUHPHQW��WKH\�DUH�DEOH�WR�DWWUDFW�PDQ\�DSSOLFDQWV�EHFDXVH�WKH\�SD\����
    DQ�KRXU�PRUH�WKDQ�DQ\�RWKHU�PDQXIDFWXUHU��

    ������ 9DOHULH�&DVWLOOR�DSSOLHG�IRU�D�MRE�ZLWK�'H[WHU¶V�DQG�ZDV�QRW�KLUHG�EHFDXVH�VKH�KDG�QHYHU�DWWHQGHG�FROOHJH���
    0V��&DVWLOOR��D�+LVSDQLF�ZRPDQ��ILOHG�FKDUJHV�RI�GLVFULPLQDWLRQ�ZLWK�WKH�((2&�� �2Q�WKH�EDVLV�RI� WKH�IDFWV�VWDWHG�
    DERYH��DV�ZHOO�DV� WKH�GDWD�EHORZ��ZLOO� WKH�((2&�LQYHVWLJDWLRQ�UHYHDO�DGYHUVH� LPSDFW�RQ� WKH�EDVLV�RI�HLWKHU�VH[�RU�
    UDFH"�$VVXPH�WKDW�DQ\�DSSOLFDQW�ZLWK�WZR�RU�PRUH�\HDUV�RI�FROOHJH�ZDV�KLUHG��

    $SSOLFDQW� 6H[� (WKQLFLW\� <HDUV�RI�&ROOHJH�
    0LNH�'RQRYDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    -DPLH�-DZRUVNL� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    0DWW�&KDPEHUV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    -RUJH�&DVWLOOR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    9DOHULH�&DVWLOOR� )HPDOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    6DQWRV�-LPLQH]� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -RVH�*DU]D� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -XDQ�5LQH]� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    $OH[�7LPPRQV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    *HQH�0DUVKDOO� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &LQG\�/DQGRQ� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    (PPHWW�0HULGLDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    %ULDQ�0RVHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    5RJHU�+LFNV� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    5REHUW�7KDFKHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    0DUFXV�:KLWH� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    2VFDU�6RWD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    -RVHSK�6DSHGD� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    .HQ�2OVHQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    (VWHEDQ�)DPRVD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    7HR�)DPRVD� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    /LOD�:HVW� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    2VFDU�3UDGR� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    )UHG��)UHHER��%RZPDQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    1DWKDQ�0DUWLQ� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    /LWWOH�&KLQR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��
    (WKDQ�7XUQHU� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &OHPVRQ�*DOW� 0DOH� :KLWH� ��
    &DPLOOD�)LJJ� )HPDOH� :KLWH� ��
    0LJXHO�3UDGR� 0DOH� +LVSDQLF� ��

    ������&HQJDJH�/HDUQLQJ��$OO�5LJKWV�5HVHUYHG��0D\�QRW�EH�VFDQQHG��FRSLHG��RU�GXSOLFDWHG��RU�SRVWHG�WR�D�SXEOLFO\�DFFHVVLEOH�ZHEVLWH��LQ�ZKROH�RU�LQ�SDUW�

    **## cedwk7.docx**

    **Part A**

    **(CHP 7) Kohl's Department Store Case Study () THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND ONLINE, I DON’T HAVE THE TEXTBOOK, SO ANSWER THE BEST YOU CAN**

    After reading the relevant chapter sections and the case study on page 268. Please address the following questions:

    1. How could the store have better handled the termination?

    2. Should the three employees have been fired?

    3. What could Kohl's have done to have prevented the situation in the first place?

    4. What could have the employees have done differently?

    **Additional Info—–>** [**Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719?wrap=1) [**Download Link**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512719/download?download_frd=1) **<——Additional Info**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    1.
    **Initial Reply/Post:**
          o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.
          o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.
          o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.


    **Part B**

    **(CHP3A) BFOQ Hooter's Forum**

    **After reviewing the Hooter's video please provide 1) your thoughts and opinions on the video, and 2) comment of the video being sure to include how the content in this video relates to chapter 3's concept of BFOQ (see p. 92).**

    **Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:**
    **1. Initial Reply/Post:**
    **o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.**
    **o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.**
    **o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.**

    **PART C**

    **Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact**

    ·
    **Submitting a text entry box**

    **Using the document provided in the Module section of the course labeled** [**"Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?wrap=1) [**Download "Exercise 3.2 – Adverse Impact"**](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/files/8512726/download?download_frd=1) **you are to determine if an EEOC investigation will reveal adverse impact on the basis of either 1) sex or 2) race? Assume that any applicant with two or more years of college was hired.**

    **You should carefully review the example provided on pages 94-95, paying close attention to table 3.2 on page 95 of your text.**

    **For both 1) Sex and 2) Race you should provide the following information like presented below for both sex and race.**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |
    | | **Males** | **Females** |
    | **Number of Applicants** | **A** | **B** |
    | **Numbered Hired** | **C** | **D** |
    | **Selection Ratio** | **C/A** | **D/B** |

    **Adverse Impact Calculation = (D/B) / (C/A) = X, IF X < .80 THEN ADVERSE IMPACT**

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Anonymous. (2017). May smartphones help to maintain memory in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease? Science News, March 1, 2017. This article discusses the success of using Google Calendar to maintain prospective memory in a patient with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Please answer each question with a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Anonymous. (2017). May smartphones help to maintain memory in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease? Science News, March 1, 2017. This article discusses the success of using Google Calendar to maintain prospective memory in a patient with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Please answer each question with at least 3 sentences.

    – What strategy was used to help the patient with memory tasks?
    – What other potential benefits could be gained with smartphone technology to help Alzheimer’s patients with memory?
    – How do you use your smartphone/tablet/fitness monitoring device to help you with memory?

    [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170301105526.htm](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170301105526.htm)

    – 2 years ago