My Blog

Tag: Pedagogical Methods & Classroom Assessment

  • [Solved] milla news letter

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment – a month ago **files (1)** – ## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx **## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx** The Revolutionary in Your Field Assignment Overview For this assignment, you will research a person who fundamentally changed, challenged, disrupted, or revolutionized a fi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx

    **## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx**

    The Revolutionary in Your Field

    Assignment Overview

    For this assignment, you will research a person who fundamentally changed, challenged, disrupted, or revolutionized a field of study or professional discipline. You will transform your research into a polished, two-page academic newsletter using Canva.

    This is a research-based argument, not a biography.

    Your central task is to make an argument about the significance of your chosen person’s work. Your newsletter should persuade an educated reader that this individual deserves to be considered revolutionary within their field.

    Your writing should demonstrate the skills expected in Composition II: research, synthesis, analysis, argumentation, organization, audience awareness, and revision.

    Learning Objectives

    By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your ability to:

    · Develop a focused, arguable thesis.

    · Conduct purposeful academic research.

    · Evaluate the credibility and relevance of sources.

    · Synthesize information from multiple sources.

    · Distinguish between summary and analysis.

    · Integrate evidence into your own argument.

    · Analyze the significance of a person’s contributions.

    · Write for a specific audience and purpose.

    · Use rhetorical strategies effectively.

    · Apply proper grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and sentence structure.

    · Design information visually without allowing design to replace substantive writing.

    The Central Question

    Your newsletter must answer:

    To what extent did this person revolutionize their field, and why does their impact continue to matter?

    You should not simply tell your reader what the person accomplished.

    You must interpret the significance of those accomplishments.

    For example, instead of writing:

    “Katherine Johnson calculated flight trajectories for NASA.”

    You might argue:

    “Katherine Johnson’s mathematical work did more than support individual NASA missions; it demonstrated the importance of mathematical precision in human spaceflight while challenging racial and gender barriers within American scientific institutions.”

    The second statement makes an argument that can be supported with research.

    Part I: Selecting Your Subject

    Choose a person whose work produced a meaningful change within a specific field.

    Your subject may come from:

    · Science

    · Medicine

    · Technology

    · Engineering

    · Mathematics

    · Education

    · Literature

    · History

    · Psychology

    · Business

    · Law

    · Politics

    · Art

    · Music

    · Communications

    · Sports

    · Other fields approved by your instructor

    Your person must have made a substantial contribution to the field.

    Avoid choosing someone solely because they are famous.

    Your research should establish what makes the person revolutionary.

    Part II: Develop an Arguable Thesis

    Your newsletter must contain a clear thesis.

    Your thesis should make a claim about your person’s significance rather than simply announcing what the newsletter will discuss.

    Weak Thesis

    “Marie Curie was an important scientist who made many discoveries.”

    Stronger Thesis

    “Marie Curie’s research on radioactivity revolutionized modern science by expanding the understanding of atomic phenomena, establishing new approaches to medical treatment, and challenging the limitations placed on women in scientific research.”

    Your thesis should provide your reader with a position that your research will prove or develop.

    Part III: Research Requirements

    You must use a minimum of 4 credible sources.

    At least 2 sources must be scholarly or academic sources, such as:

    · Peer-reviewed journal articles

    · Academic books

    · University publications

    · Government publications

    · Reputable research institutions

    The remaining sources may include credible:

    · Newspapers

    · Museums

    · Professional organizations

    · Documentaries

    · Major reference databases

    · Reputable websites

    Wikipedia may be used to locate background information or additional sources, but it does not count as one of your four required sources.

    You are responsible for evaluating the credibility of your sources.

    Consider:

    · Who produced the information?

    · What qualifications does the author or organization have?

    · What evidence is provided?

    · When was the information published or updated?

    · What purpose does the source serve?

    · Is the information supported by other credible sources?

    Part IV: Source Synthesis

    Your newsletter must demonstrate synthesis.

    Do not organize your research as:

    Source 1 says…

    Source 2 says…

    Source 3 says…

    Instead, bring sources together to develop your own ideas.

    For example:

    Historians have emphasized both the scientific significance of Curie’s research and the institutional barriers she encountered. Her discoveries expanded scientific knowledge of radioactivity, while her career demonstrated the difficulties women faced when attempting to establish authority within scientific institutions.

    The goal is for your analysis to control the research, rather than allowing the sources to control your writing.

    Part V: Required Newsletter Content

    Your newsletter must contain the following sections.

    1. Headline

    Create an engaging headline that reflects your argument.

    Avoid generic titles such as:

    “The Life of Albert Einstein.”

    Instead, consider:

    “Rewriting the Rules of Physics: Einstein’s Revolution in Modern Science”

    2. Introduction

    Introduce your subject, field, and central argument.

    Your introduction should establish:

    · Who the person was

    · Their field

    · The major issue or development associated with their work

    · Why their contribution matters

    · Your thesis

    3. Context: The Field Before the Revolution

    Explain what the field looked like before your subject’s major contribution.

    This section is important because readers cannot understand a revolution without understanding what changed.

    Address questions such as:

    · What were the dominant ideas?

    · What problems existed?

    · What limitations existed?

    · What did people previously believe?

    · What technological, cultural, or institutional conditions existed?

    4. The Revolutionary Contribution

    Identify the person’s most significant contribution.

    Explain:

    · What they did

    · How they did it

    · What problem they addressed

    · What made the contribution different

    · What evidence demonstrates its importance

    Avoid simply listing accomplishments.

    Analyze their significance.

    5. Impact on the Field

    Explain how the person’s work changed the discipline.

    Consider:

    · New theories

    · New technologies

    · New practices

    · New research methods

    · Changes in public understanding

    · Changes in professional practices

    · Influence on later researchers

    · Institutional or cultural changes

    Your reader should understand the before-and-after effect of the person’s work.

    6. Challenges, Opposition, or Limitations

    A sophisticated argument should acknowledge complexity.

    Discuss at least one significant challenge, criticism, limitation, controversy, or obstacle associated with the person’s work or career.

    Then analyze its significance.

    This section should prevent your newsletter from becoming a simple “great person” profile.

    7. Lasting Legacy

    Explain why this person still matters.

    Connect their historical contribution to the present.

    Ask:

    What would this field look like today if this person had never made their contribution?

    You do not have to claim that one individual single-handedly changed an entire field. Instead, evaluate their degree of influence.

    8. Conclusion

    Return to your thesis.

    Your conclusion should not simply repeat your introduction.

    Instead:

    · Synthesize your major findings.

    · Reinforce your argument.

    · Explain the broader significance of the person’s contribution.

    · Leave the reader with a meaningful final insight.

    Part VI: Evidence and Analysis

    Your newsletter must maintain a balance between evidence and your own analysis.

    Use research to support your claims, but explain why the evidence matters.

    A useful pattern is:

    Claim → Evidence → Analysis → Significance

    Ask yourself:

    “So what?”

    After presenting an important fact, explain why that fact matters to your argument.

    Part VII: MLA Documentation

    Because this is Composition II, your research should demonstrate academic documentation skills.

    Use MLA format for:

    · In-text citations

    · Works Cited

    Your newsletter must include a Works Cited section containing your sources.

    Your sources should also be documented throughout the newsletter when you use information, ideas, statistics, or quotations from them.

    Part VIII: Visual Rhetoric

    Your Canva design is part of the assignment’s rhetoric.

    Include relevant visuals that help communicate your argument.

    Possible visuals include:

    · Photographs

    · Historical documents

    · Charts

    · Graphs

    · Timelines

    · Diagrams

    · Maps

    · Images of inventions or discoveries

    · Primary-source images

    Do not use visuals simply to decorate the page.

    Each major visual should have a purpose.

    Ask:

    How does this visual help my reader understand my argument?

    Where appropriate, include a brief caption explaining the significance of the visual.

    Part IX: Required Mechanics

    Your newsletter must demonstrate intentional control of written language.

    You must correctly use:

    Commas

    Minimum: 4

    Semicolons

    Minimum: 3

    Colons

    Minimum: 3

    These punctuation marks must be used correctly and purposefully.

    Incorrect or artificially inserted punctuation will not satisfy the requirement.

    Your newsletter must also demonstrate:

    · Correct capitalization

    · Complete sentences

    · Appropriate paragraph structure

    · Correct subject-verb agreement

    · Appropriate verb tense

    · Correct pronoun usage

    · Appropriate transitions

    · Proper quotation integration

    · Correct spelling

    · Appropriate academic vocabulary

    Part X: Two-Page Minimum

    Your newsletter must be a minimum of two full pages.

    The two-page requirement applies to substantive writing, not simply visual design.

    Do not manipulate:

    · Font size

    · Margins

    · Line spacing

    · Images

    · Text boxes

    to artificially create additional pages.

    Your instructor may require additional length if the research and analysis cannot be adequately developed within two pages.

    Composition II Standard

    Your newsletter should demonstrate the difference between summary and analysis.

    Summary asks:

    What happened?

    Analysis asks:

    Why did it happen?

    Why was it significant?

    What changed because of it?

    What evidence supports that interpretation?

    What are the limitations of that interpretation?

    Why should the reader care?

    Your newsletter should prioritize analysis over biography.

    **## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx**

    The Revolutionary in Your Field

    Assignment Overview

    For this assignment, you will research a person who fundamentally changed, challenged, disrupted, or revolutionized a field of study or professional discipline. You will transform your research into a polished, two-page academic newsletter using Canva.

    This is a research-based argument, not a biography.

    Your central task is to make an argument about the significance of your chosen person’s work. Your newsletter should persuade an educated reader that this individual deserves to be considered revolutionary within their field.

    Your writing should demonstrate the skills expected in Composition II: research, synthesis, analysis, argumentation, organization, audience awareness, and revision.

    Learning Objectives

    By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your ability to:

    · Develop a focused, arguable thesis.

    · Conduct purposeful academic research.

    · Evaluate the credibility and relevance of sources.

    · Synthesize information from multiple sources.

    · Distinguish between summary and analysis.

    · Integrate evidence into your own argument.

    · Analyze the significance of a person’s contributions.

    · Write for a specific audience and purpose.

    · Use rhetorical strategies effectively.

    · Apply proper grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and sentence structure.

    · Design information visually without allowing design to replace substantive writing.

    The Central Question

    Your newsletter must answer:

    To what extent did this person revolutionize their field, and why does their impact continue to matter?

    You should not simply tell your reader what the person accomplished.

    You must interpret the significance of those accomplishments.

    For example, instead of writing:

    “Katherine Johnson calculated flight trajectories for NASA.”

    You might argue:

    “Katherine Johnson’s mathematical work did more than support individual NASA missions; it demonstrated the importance of mathematical precision in human spaceflight while challenging racial and gender barriers within American scientific institutions.”

    The second statement makes an argument that can be supported with research.

    Part I: Selecting Your Subject

    Choose a person whose work produced a meaningful change within a specific field.

    Your subject may come from:

    · Science

    · Medicine

    · Technology

    · Engineering

    · Mathematics

    · Education

    · Literature

    · History

    · Psychology

    · Business

    · Law

    · Politics

    · Art

    · Music

    · Communications

    · Sports

    · Other fields approved by your instructor

    Your person must have made a substantial contribution to the field.

    Avoid choosing someone solely because they are famous.

    Your research should establish what makes the person revolutionary.

    Part II: Develop an Arguable Thesis

    Your newsletter must contain a clear thesis.

    Your thesis should make a claim about your person’s significance rather than simply announcing what the newsletter will discuss.

    Weak Thesis

    “Marie Curie was an important scientist who made many discoveries.”

    Stronger Thesis

    “Marie Curie’s research on radioactivity revolutionized modern science by expanding the understanding of atomic phenomena, establishing new approaches to medical treatment, and challenging the limitations placed on women in scientific research.”

    Your thesis should provide your reader with a position that your research will prove or develop.

    Part III: Research Requirements

    You must use a minimum of 4 credible sources.

    At least 2 sources must be scholarly or academic sources, such as:

    · Peer-reviewed journal articles

    · Academic books

    · University publications

    · Government publications

    · Reputable research institutions

    The remaining sources may include credible:

    · Newspapers

    · Museums

    · Professional organizations

    · Documentaries

    · Major reference databases

    · Reputable websites

    Wikipedia may be used to locate background information or additional sources, but it does not count as one of your four required sources.

    You are responsible for evaluating the credibility of your sources.

    Consider:

    · Who produced the information?

    · What qualifications does the author or organization have?

    · What evidence is provided?

    · When was the information published or updated?

    · What purpose does the source serve?

    · Is the information supported by other credible sources?

    Part IV: Source Synthesis

    Your newsletter must demonstrate synthesis.

    Do not organize your research as:

    Source 1 says…

    Source 2 says…

    Source 3 says…

    Instead, bring sources together to develop your own ideas.

    For example:

    Historians have emphasized both the scientific significance of Curie’s research and the institutional barriers she encountered. Her discoveries expanded scientific knowledge of radioactivity, while her career demonstrated the difficulties women faced when attempting to establish authority within scientific institutions.

    The goal is for your analysis to control the research, rather than allowing the sources to control your writing.

    Part V: Required Newsletter Content

    Your newsletter must contain the following sections.

    1. Headline

    Create an engaging headline that reflects your argument.

    Avoid generic titles such as:

    “The Life of Albert Einstein.”

    Instead, consider:

    “Rewriting the Rules of Physics: Einstein’s Revolution in Modern Science”

    2. Introduction

    Introduce your subject, field, and central argument.

    Your introduction should establish:

    · Who the person was

    · Their field

    · The major issue or development associated with their work

    · Why their contribution matters

    · Your thesis

    3. Context: The Field Before the Revolution

    Explain what the field looked like before your subject’s major contribution.

    This section is important because readers cannot understand a revolution without understanding what changed.

    Address questions such as:

    · What were the dominant ideas?

    · What problems existed?

    · What limitations existed?

    · What did people previously believe?

    · What technological, cultural, or institutional conditions existed?

    4. The Revolutionary Contribution

    Identify the person’s most significant contribution.

    Explain:

    · What they did

    · How they did it

    · What problem they addressed

    · What made the contribution different

    · What evidence demonstrates its importance

    Avoid simply listing accomplishments.

    Analyze their significance.

    5. Impact on the Field

    Explain how the person’s work changed the discipline.

    Consider:

    · New theories

    · New technologies

    · New practices

    · New research methods

    · Changes in public understanding

    · Changes in professional practices

    · Influence on later researchers

    · Institutional or cultural changes

    Your reader should understand the before-and-after effect of the person’s work.

    6. Challenges, Opposition, or Limitations

    A sophisticated argument should acknowledge complexity.

    Discuss at least one significant challenge, criticism, limitation, controversy, or obstacle associated with the person’s work or career.

    Then analyze its significance.

    This section should prevent your newsletter from becoming a simple “great person” profile.

    7. Lasting Legacy

    Explain why this person still matters.

    Connect their historical contribution to the present.

    Ask:

    What would this field look like today if this person had never made their contribution?

    You do not have to claim that one individual single-handedly changed an entire field. Instead, evaluate their degree of influence.

    8. Conclusion

    Return to your thesis.

    Your conclusion should not simply repeat your introduction.

    Instead:

    · Synthesize your major findings.

    · Reinforce your argument.

    · Explain the broader significance of the person’s contribution.

    · Leave the reader with a meaningful final insight.

    Part VI: Evidence and Analysis

    Your newsletter must maintain a balance between evidence and your own analysis.

    Use research to support your claims, but explain why the evidence matters.

    A useful pattern is:

    Claim → Evidence → Analysis → Significance

    Ask yourself:

    “So what?”

    After presenting an important fact, explain why that fact matters to your argument.

    Part VII: MLA Documentation

    Because this is Composition II, your research should demonstrate academic documentation skills.

    Use MLA format for:

    · In-text citations

    · Works Cited

    Your newsletter must include a Works Cited section containing your sources.

    Your sources should also be documented throughout the newsletter when you use information, ideas, statistics, or quotations from them.

    Part VIII: Visual Rhetoric

    Your Canva design is part of the assignment’s rhetoric.

    Include relevant visuals that help communicate your argument.

    Possible visuals include:

    · Photographs

    · Historical documents

    · Charts

    · Graphs

    · Timelines

    · Diagrams

    · Maps

    · Images of inventions or discoveries

    · Primary-source images

    Do not use visuals simply to decorate the page.

    Each major visual should have a purpose.

    Ask:

    How does this visual help my reader understand my argument?

    Where appropriate, include a brief caption explaining the significance of the visual.

    Part IX: Required Mechanics

    Your newsletter must demonstrate intentional control of written language.

    You must correctly use:

    Commas

    Minimum: 4

    Semicolons

    Minimum: 3

    Colons

    Minimum: 3

    These punctuation marks must be used correctly and purposefully.

    Incorrect or artificially inserted punctuation will not satisfy the requirement.

    Your newsletter must also demonstrate:

    · Correct capitalization

    · Complete sentences

    · Appropriate paragraph structure

    · Correct subject-verb agreement

    · Appropriate verb tense

    · Correct pronoun usage

    · Appropriate transitions

    · Proper quotation integration

    · Correct spelling

    · Appropriate academic vocabulary

    Part X: Two-Page Minimum

    Your newsletter must be a minimum of two full pages.

    The two-page requirement applies to substantive writing, not simply visual design.

    Do not manipulate:

    · Font size

    · Margins

    · Line spacing

    · Images

    · Text boxes

    to artificially create additional pages.

    Your instructor may require additional length if the research and analysis cannot be adequately developed within two pages.

    Composition II Standard

    Your newsletter should demonstrate the difference between summary and analysis.

    Summary asks:

    What happened?

    Analysis asks:

    Why did it happen?

    Why was it significant?

    What changed because of it?

    What evidence supports that interpretation?

    What are the limitations of that interpretation?

    Why should the reader care?

    Your newsletter should prioritize analysis over biography.

  • [Solved] jay class SOCI331

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This week you explored several types of qualitative research designs. Using the APUS Library, search for two peer reviewed journal articles that use a qualitative research design (ethnography, narrative, case study, etc.). Construct a summary comparing and contrasting the designs used in each study….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This week you explored several types of qualitative research designs. Using the APUS Library, search for two peer reviewed journal articles that use a qualitative research design (ethnography, narrative, case study, etc.). Construct a summary comparing and contrasting the designs used in each study. How are the studies similar? How do they differ? Be sure to look closely at aspects like topic, research questions, sample size, analysis, etc. Finally, consider another qualitative research design that could have been used in the studies. How would the study have differed if another research design been used?

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering replies.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] staris week 3 proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment – a month ago **files (2)** – ## GuidetoArtHistoryResearchPaper.pdf – ## starisweek3artproposal.docx **## GuidetoArtHistoryResearchPaper.pdf** Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper (Tips developed with the help of Google AI) Step 1: Initial observation and description Be…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    – a month ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## GuidetoArtHistoryResearchPaper.pdf

    – ## starisweek3artproposal.docx

    **## GuidetoArtHistoryResearchPaper.pdf**

    Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper
    (Tips developed with the help of Google AI)

    Step 1: Initial observation and description
    Before you begin your research, perform a close observation of the artwork itself without
    preconceptions.

    • Gather basic information: Note the artist's name (if known), the title of the work, the date

    it was created, the medium (e.g., oil on canvas, bronze sculpture), and its dimensions.

    • Describe what you see: Go beyond a simple summary and write down specific,

    objective observations. What is the subject matter? What colors, shapes, lines, and
    textures are used? How is the composition arranged? What is the overall mood or
    atmosphere?

    • Analyze formal elements: Consider how the artist's technique and use of design
    principles, such as contrast, balance, and rhythm, contribute to the work's overall
    effect.

    Step 2: Sociocultural research
    Research the environment surrounding the artwork's creation to understand its deeper
    meaning.

    • Historical context: Investigate the specific time period in which the art was made. What

    major historical events, political movements, or wars were occurring? Look for how
    these events might have influenced the artwork.

    • Cultural context: Explore the culture from which the artwork emerged. Research the
    prevailing cultural beliefs, customs, and artistic traditions. Are there any symbols, myths,
    or religious references in the work that would have been recognizable to its original
    audience?

    • Social and economic context: Look at the social issues of the time. What was the social
    structure like? What were the roles of different social classes, genders, or races?
    Consider who the art was created for and who was typically its audience.

    • Artist's background: Learn about the artist's life, influences, training, and intentions. An
    artist's personal experiences, values, and other works can provide valuable insight into
    a specific piece.

    • Reception history: Investigate how the artwork was received by critics and the public at
    the time of its creation and how its reception has evolved over time.

    Step 3: Interpretive analysis
    Synthesize your observations and research to construct a thoughtful analysis.

    • Develop a thesis: Formulate a central argument about how the artwork and its

    sociocultural context are connected. For instance, your thesis could argue that the piece

    "challenges the patriarchal norms of its era by subverting traditional depictions of
    female beauty".

    • Connect form and context: Explain how the formal elements you observed in Step 1
    support your sociocultural interpretation. For example, you might argue that the artist's
    use of muted colors creates a somber mood that reflects the anxieties of the time.

    • Explain symbolism: Based on your cultural research, interpret any symbols or
    iconography within the artwork. Explain what these symbols represent within their
    cultural system and how they contribute to the work's overall message.

    • Consider the artist's choices: Analyze why the artist made specific choices, such as
    their medium, subject matter, or style, in relation to their social world. What message
    were they trying to convey? Were they attempting to make a political, economic, or
    social comment?

    Step 4: Structuring your essay
    Organize your analysis into a coherent essay with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

    • Introduction: Introduce the artwork with its key details and present your thesis

    statement. This sets the stage for your argument.

    • Body paragraphs: Dedicate separate paragraphs to your main points, with each point

    supported by evidence from both your formal analysis and contextual research. Use
    transition sentences to ensure a logical flow.

    • Conclusion: Summarize your findings and re-emphasize your thesis in a new way.
    Discuss the work's overall impact and significance within its original context and in the
    present day.

    – Step 1: Initial observation and description
    – Step 2: Sociocultural research
    – Step 3: Interpretive analysis
    – Step 4: Structuring your essay

    **## starisweek3artproposal.docx**

    For your final paper you will research and analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. This week, you will select the work of art you would like to use.

    First, complete the following steps:

    1. Review the requirements for the Final Paper including the assignment instructions and the Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper

    2. After exploring the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture.

    3. Explore the resource at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to explore the
    [Art and Film Research Guide.](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/) If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage. If you are unable to find scholarly information about the work of art you selected, you may need to choose a different work to investigate.

    Then, you should write and submit a paper proposal that includes the following:

    1. A full identification of the work of art you will use as your final paper. This should include the artist, title, date, medium, and collection where the work of art is displayed. Include an image and a link to the work of art.

    2. A detailed description of the work of art. Remember to incorporate key terms and vocabulary discussed in the course. Focus on how the artist uses the elements of composition and principles of design. (Imagine describing the work to someone who cannot see it) This should be at least 2/3 a page (250+ words).

    3. Three scholarly resources that you can use to learn more about your work of art. Cite your sources in APA, MLA, or other university accepted format. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources. Note, ALL resources must be "traceable" by having a functional URL. The instructor must be able to click the URL and go directly to the resource.
    **NOTE, fake resources will be seen as plagiarism**. If you use AI to do research, double-checking the veracity of the reference is on you.

    Final paper instructions

    For this paper, you will combine the lessons in this course to analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. You will look at a work of art and carefully describe the use of the elements of composition and principles of design. Then, you will research the work of art and discuss how the work of art was interpreted by the original audience.

    1.
    **Step 1: Week 3 – Paper Proposal**: After visiting the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture. Record the identification information for the work you select (artist, title, date, medium, and museum collection).

    2.
    **Step 2: Week 5 – Annotated Bibliography**: Explore the resources at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to use the
    [Art and Film Research Guide](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/). If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage.

    3.
    **Step 3: Week 7 – Final Paper:** You will write a formal essay that includes the following:

    I.
    **Introduction**: this paragraph should identify the work of art you will analyze, introduce the purpose of your paper and include a thesis statement that presents the major point (argument) of your paper.

    II.
    **Formal/Visual Analysis**: this section should incorporate the elements of composition and principles of design as you describe a work of art for your reader. Aim to discuss the work of art as though you are trying to paint a mental picture of the work.

    III.
    **Sociocultural Analysis**: this section should consider how the work of art reflects the time period in which it was created.

    IV.
    **Conclusion**: this paragraph should restate your thesis and be a summary of the major points you made in your paper.

    V.
    **Works Consulted and Works Cited**: cite the resources you used to help you develop your ideas. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub [Web Page]](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources.

    **## starisweek3artproposal.docx**

    For your final paper you will research and analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. This week, you will select the work of art you would like to use.

    First, complete the following steps:

    1. Review the requirements for the Final Paper including the assignment instructions and the Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper

    2. After exploring the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture.

    3. Explore the resource at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to explore the
    [Art and Film Research Guide.](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/) If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage. If you are unable to find scholarly information about the work of art you selected, you may need to choose a different work to investigate.

    Then, you should write and submit a paper proposal that includes the following:

    1. A full identification of the work of art you will use as your final paper. This should include the artist, title, date, medium, and collection where the work of art is displayed. Include an image and a link to the work of art.

    2. A detailed description of the work of art. Remember to incorporate key terms and vocabulary discussed in the course. Focus on how the artist uses the elements of composition and principles of design. (Imagine describing the work to someone who cannot see it) This should be at least 2/3 a page (250+ words).

    3. Three scholarly resources that you can use to learn more about your work of art. Cite your sources in APA, MLA, or other university accepted format. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources. Note, ALL resources must be "traceable" by having a functional URL. The instructor must be able to click the URL and go directly to the resource.
    **NOTE, fake resources will be seen as plagiarism**. If you use AI to do research, double-checking the veracity of the reference is on you.

    Final paper instructions

    For this paper, you will combine the lessons in this course to analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. You will look at a work of art and carefully describe the use of the elements of composition and principles of design. Then, you will research the work of art and discuss how the work of art was interpreted by the original audience.

    1.
    **Step 1: Week 3 – Paper Proposal**: After visiting the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture. Record the identification information for the work you select (artist, title, date, medium, and museum collection).

    2.
    **Step 2: Week 5 – Annotated Bibliography**: Explore the resources at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to use the
    [Art and Film Research Guide](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/). If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage.

    3.
    **Step 3: Week 7 – Final Paper:** You will write a formal essay that includes the following:

    I.
    **Introduction**: this paragraph should identify the work of art you will analyze, introduce the purpose of your paper and include a thesis statement that presents the major point (argument) of your paper.

    II.
    **Formal/Visual Analysis**: this section should incorporate the elements of composition and principles of design as you describe a work of art for your reader. Aim to discuss the work of art as though you are trying to paint a mental picture of the work.

    III.
    **Sociocultural Analysis**: this section should consider how the work of art reflects the time period in which it was created.

    IV.
    **Conclusion**: this paragraph should restate your thesis and be a summary of the major points you made in your paper.

    V.
    **Works Consulted and Works Cited**: cite the resources you used to help you develop your ideas. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub [Web Page]](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources.

    **## GuidetoArtHistoryResearchPaper.pdf**

    Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper
    (Tips developed with the help of Google AI)

    Step 1: Initial observation and description
    Before you begin your research, perform a close observation of the artwork itself without
    preconceptions.

    • Gather basic information: Note the artist's name (if known), the title of the work, the date

    it was created, the medium (e.g., oil on canvas, bronze sculpture), and its dimensions.

    • Describe what you see: Go beyond a simple summary and write down specific,

    objective observations. What is the subject matter? What colors, shapes, lines, and
    textures are used? How is the composition arranged? What is the overall mood or
    atmosphere?

    • Analyze formal elements: Consider how the artist's technique and use of design
    principles, such as contrast, balance, and rhythm, contribute to the work's overall
    effect.

    Step 2: Sociocultural research
    Research the environment surrounding the artwork's creation to understand its deeper
    meaning.

    • Historical context: Investigate the specific time period in which the art was made. What

    major historical events, political movements, or wars were occurring? Look for how
    these events might have influenced the artwork.

    • Cultural context: Explore the culture from which the artwork emerged. Research the
    prevailing cultural beliefs, customs, and artistic traditions. Are there any symbols, myths,
    or religious references in the work that would have been recognizable to its original
    audience?

    • Social and economic context: Look at the social issues of the time. What was the social
    structure like? What were the roles of different social classes, genders, or races?
    Consider who the art was created for and who was typically its audience.

    • Artist's background: Learn about the artist's life, influences, training, and intentions. An
    artist's personal experiences, values, and other works can provide valuable insight into
    a specific piece.

    • Reception history: Investigate how the artwork was received by critics and the public at
    the time of its creation and how its reception has evolved over time.

    Step 3: Interpretive analysis
    Synthesize your observations and research to construct a thoughtful analysis.

    • Develop a thesis: Formulate a central argument about how the artwork and its

    sociocultural context are connected. For instance, your thesis could argue that the piece

    "challenges the patriarchal norms of its era by subverting traditional depictions of
    female beauty".

    • Connect form and context: Explain how the formal elements you observed in Step 1
    support your sociocultural interpretation. For example, you might argue that the artist's
    use of muted colors creates a somber mood that reflects the anxieties of the time.

    • Explain symbolism: Based on your cultural research, interpret any symbols or
    iconography within the artwork. Explain what these symbols represent within their
    cultural system and how they contribute to the work's overall message.

    • Consider the artist's choices: Analyze why the artist made specific choices, such as
    their medium, subject matter, or style, in relation to their social world. What message
    were they trying to convey? Were they attempting to make a political, economic, or
    social comment?

    Step 4: Structuring your essay
    Organize your analysis into a coherent essay with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

    • Introduction: Introduce the artwork with its key details and present your thesis

    statement. This sets the stage for your argument.

    • Body paragraphs: Dedicate separate paragraphs to your main points, with each point

    supported by evidence from both your formal analysis and contextual research. Use
    transition sentences to ensure a logical flow.

    • Conclusion: Summarize your findings and re-emphasize your thesis in a new way.
    Discuss the work's overall impact and significance within its original context and in the
    present day.

    – Step 1: Initial observation and description
    – Step 2: Sociocultural research
    – Step 3: Interpretive analysis
    – Step 4: Structuring your essay

    **## starisweek3artproposal.docx**

    For your final paper you will research and analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. This week, you will select the work of art you would like to use.

    First, complete the following steps:

    1. Review the requirements for the Final Paper including the assignment instructions and the Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper

    2. After exploring the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture.

    3. Explore the resource at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to explore the
    [Art and Film Research Guide.](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/) If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage. If you are unable to find scholarly information about the work of art you selected, you may need to choose a different work to investigate.

    Then, you should write and submit a paper proposal that includes the following:

    1. A full identification of the work of art you will use as your final paper. This should include the artist, title, date, medium, and collection where the work of art is displayed. Include an image and a link to the work of art.

    2. A detailed description of the work of art. Remember to incorporate key terms and vocabulary discussed in the course. Focus on how the artist uses the elements of composition and principles of design. (Imagine describing the work to someone who cannot see it) This should be at least 2/3 a page (250+ words).

    3. Three scholarly resources that you can use to learn more about your work of art. Cite your sources in APA, MLA, or other university accepted format. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources. Note, ALL resources must be "traceable" by having a functional URL. The instructor must be able to click the URL and go directly to the resource.
    **NOTE, fake resources will be seen as plagiarism**. If you use AI to do research, double-checking the veracity of the reference is on you.

    Final paper instructions

    For this paper, you will combine the lessons in this course to analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. You will look at a work of art and carefully describe the use of the elements of composition and principles of design. Then, you will research the work of art and discuss how the work of art was interpreted by the original audience.

    1.
    **Step 1: Week 3 – Paper Proposal**: After visiting the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture. Record the identification information for the work you select (artist, title, date, medium, and museum collection).

    2.
    **Step 2: Week 5 – Annotated Bibliography**: Explore the resources at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to use the
    [Art and Film Research Guide](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/). If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage.

    3.
    **Step 3: Week 7 – Final Paper:** You will write a formal essay that includes the following:

    I.
    **Introduction**: this paragraph should identify the work of art you will analyze, introduce the purpose of your paper and include a thesis statement that presents the major point (argument) of your paper.

    II.
    **Formal/Visual Analysis**: this section should incorporate the elements of composition and principles of design as you describe a work of art for your reader. Aim to discuss the work of art as though you are trying to paint a mental picture of the work.

    III.
    **Sociocultural Analysis**: this section should consider how the work of art reflects the time period in which it was created.

    IV.
    **Conclusion**: this paragraph should restate your thesis and be a summary of the major points you made in your paper.

    V.
    **Works Consulted and Works Cited**: cite the resources you used to help you develop your ideas. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub [Web Page]](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources.

    **## GuidetoArtHistoryResearchPaper.pdf**

    Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper
    (Tips developed with the help of Google AI)

    Step 1: Initial observation and description
    Before you begin your research, perform a close observation of the artwork itself without
    preconceptions.

    • Gather basic information: Note the artist's name (if known), the title of the work, the date

    it was created, the medium (e.g., oil on canvas, bronze sculpture), and its dimensions.

    • Describe what you see: Go beyond a simple summary and write down specific,

    objective observations. What is the subject matter? What colors, shapes, lines, and
    textures are used? How is the composition arranged? What is the overall mood or
    atmosphere?

    • Analyze formal elements: Consider how the artist's technique and use of design
    principles, such as contrast, balance, and rhythm, contribute to the work's overall
    effect.

    Step 2: Sociocultural research
    Research the environment surrounding the artwork's creation to understand its deeper
    meaning.

    • Historical context: Investigate the specific time period in which the art was made. What

    major historical events, political movements, or wars were occurring? Look for how
    these events might have influenced the artwork.

    • Cultural context: Explore the culture from which the artwork emerged. Research the
    prevailing cultural beliefs, customs, and artistic traditions. Are there any symbols, myths,
    or religious references in the work that would have been recognizable to its original
    audience?

    • Social and economic context: Look at the social issues of the time. What was the social
    structure like? What were the roles of different social classes, genders, or races?
    Consider who the art was created for and who was typically its audience.

    • Artist's background: Learn about the artist's life, influences, training, and intentions. An
    artist's personal experiences, values, and other works can provide valuable insight into
    a specific piece.

    • Reception history: Investigate how the artwork was received by critics and the public at
    the time of its creation and how its reception has evolved over time.

    Step 3: Interpretive analysis
    Synthesize your observations and research to construct a thoughtful analysis.

    • Develop a thesis: Formulate a central argument about how the artwork and its

    sociocultural context are connected. For instance, your thesis could argue that the piece

    "challenges the patriarchal norms of its era by subverting traditional depictions of
    female beauty".

    • Connect form and context: Explain how the formal elements you observed in Step 1
    support your sociocultural interpretation. For example, you might argue that the artist's
    use of muted colors creates a somber mood that reflects the anxieties of the time.

    • Explain symbolism: Based on your cultural research, interpret any symbols or
    iconography within the artwork. Explain what these symbols represent within their
    cultural system and how they contribute to the work's overall message.

    • Consider the artist's choices: Analyze why the artist made specific choices, such as
    their medium, subject matter, or style, in relation to their social world. What message
    were they trying to convey? Were they attempting to make a political, economic, or
    social comment?

    Step 4: Structuring your essay
    Organize your analysis into a coherent essay with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

    • Introduction: Introduce the artwork with its key details and present your thesis

    statement. This sets the stage for your argument.

    • Body paragraphs: Dedicate separate paragraphs to your main points, with each point

    supported by evidence from both your formal analysis and contextual research. Use
    transition sentences to ensure a logical flow.

    • Conclusion: Summarize your findings and re-emphasize your thesis in a new way.
    Discuss the work's overall impact and significance within its original context and in the
    present day.

    – Step 1: Initial observation and description
    – Step 2: Sociocultural research
    – Step 3: Interpretive analysis
    – Step 4: Structuring your essay

    **## starisweek3artproposal.docx**

    For your final paper you will research and analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. This week, you will select the work of art you would like to use.

    First, complete the following steps:

    1. Review the requirements for the Final Paper including the assignment instructions and the Guide: Writing an Art History Research Paper

    2. After exploring the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture.

    3. Explore the resource at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to explore the
    [Art and Film Research Guide.](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/) If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage. If you are unable to find scholarly information about the work of art you selected, you may need to choose a different work to investigate.

    Then, you should write and submit a paper proposal that includes the following:

    1. A full identification of the work of art you will use as your final paper. This should include the artist, title, date, medium, and collection where the work of art is displayed. Include an image and a link to the work of art.

    2. A detailed description of the work of art. Remember to incorporate key terms and vocabulary discussed in the course. Focus on how the artist uses the elements of composition and principles of design. (Imagine describing the work to someone who cannot see it) This should be at least 2/3 a page (250+ words).

    3. Three scholarly resources that you can use to learn more about your work of art. Cite your sources in APA, MLA, or other university accepted format. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources. Note, ALL resources must be "traceable" by having a functional URL. The instructor must be able to click the URL and go directly to the resource.
    **NOTE, fake resources will be seen as plagiarism**. If you use AI to do research, double-checking the veracity of the reference is on you.

    Final paper instructions

    For this paper, you will combine the lessons in this course to analyze a work of art using formal and sociocultural methods of analysis. You will look at a work of art and carefully describe the use of the elements of composition and principles of design. Then, you will research the work of art and discuss how the work of art was interpreted by the original audience.

    1.
    **Step 1: Week 3 – Paper Proposal**: After visiting the art museums on Google Arts and Culture, identify a work of art that catches your eye and that you would like to learn more about during this course. Your selection should be a painting, print, photograph, or sculpture. Record the identification information for the work you select (artist, title, date, medium, and museum collection).

    2.
    **Step 2: Week 5 – Annotated Bibliography**: Explore the resources at the Trefry Library to ensure you can find scholarly information about the work of art you selected. You might find it helpful to use the
    [Art and Film Research Guide](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/research/research-tools/research-guides/school-of-arts-and-humanities/art-and-film/). If you need help, remember you can use the “Ask a Librarian” chat the top of the library’s webpage.

    3.
    **Step 3: Week 7 – Final Paper:** You will write a formal essay that includes the following:

    I.
    **Introduction**: this paragraph should identify the work of art you will analyze, introduce the purpose of your paper and include a thesis statement that presents the major point (argument) of your paper.

    II.
    **Formal/Visual Analysis**: this section should incorporate the elements of composition and principles of design as you describe a work of art for your reader. Aim to discuss the work of art as though you are trying to paint a mental picture of the work.

    III.
    **Sociocultural Analysis**: this section should consider how the work of art reflects the time period in which it was created.

    IV.
    **Conclusion**: this paragraph should restate your thesis and be a summary of the major points you made in your paper.

    V.
    **Works Consulted and Works Cited**: cite the resources you used to help you develop your ideas. You might use the
    [Trefry Library’s Citation Hub [Web Page]](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/resources/writing/writing-at-apus/citation-hub/) for help citing your sources.

  • [Solved] sam week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachments – a month ago **files (1)** – ## samweek3assignment.docx **## samweek3assignment.docx** For this assignment, you will write a minimum 1,000-word analytical essay evaluating a workplace scenario involving affirmative action and bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) issues…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachments

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## samweek3assignment.docx

    **## samweek3assignment.docx**

    For this assignment, you will write a minimum 1,000-word analytical essay evaluating a workplace scenario involving affirmative action and bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) issues. You will analyze potential Title VII liability, the validity of employer justifications, and the risks associated with the promotion decision.

    Your paper must follow APA 7th edition format and incorporate at least five scholarly sources.

    **Scenario**

    _ABC Medical Center (ABC) is a midsize hospital that receives federal research funding. As a federal contractor, ABC is required to maintain an affirmative action plan (AAP) under Executive Order 11246. A recent OFCCP audit revealed underrepresentation of women in certain supervisory positions, including areas of patient care involving intimate medical services. ABC was instructed to review its recruitment and promotion processes and ensure that qualified individuals were receiving fair consideration._

    _A supervisory role in the Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB/GYN) unit became vacant. Two internal candidates were selected as finalists:_

    ·
    _Applicant A: A male nurse with 12 years at ABC, excellent performance reviews, and prior leadership experience._

    ·
    _Applicant B: A female nurse with four years of experience and strong evaluations._

    _After interviews, ABC promoted Applicant B. Internal emails among decision-makers stated that:_

    ·
    _“A female supervisor in OB/GYN aligns more naturally with patient expectations.”_

    ·
    _“Privacy concerns in intimate medical settings may favor female leadership.”_

    ·
    _“Increasing female representation in supervisory roles supports the goals of our updated affirmative action plan.”_

    _Applicant A has filed a Title VII sex discrimination complaint. He argues that ABC improperly used sex as a deciding factor and that the hospital is attempting to justify discrimination by referencing its affirmative action plan and patient preferences. He further alleges that ABC is wrongly treating sex as a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) when the supervisory role does not require providing intimate patient care personally._

    _ABC leadership contends that:_

    1.
    _Their AAP allows consideration of representation data when selecting among multiple qualified candidates._

    2.
    _Patient comfort in OB/GYN units often involves privacy concerns that may justify considering sex._

    3.
    _Supervisory oversight in sensitive clinical areas may involve duties that relate directly to these privacy considerations._

    **Assignment Instructions**

    Write a 1,000+ word APA-formatted essay analyzing the scenario above. Your paper must address the following components:

    1. Legal Analysis of the Affirmative Action Issue

    · Explain the legal standards governing voluntary affirmative action plans under Title VII.

    · Analyze whether ABC’s AAP can lawfully influence a promotion decision.

    · Assess whether the hospital’s reasoning fits within permissible affirmative action principles (e.g., Weber, Johnson) or crosses into unlawful sex-based preference.

    2. Legal Analysis of the BFOQ Issue

    · Evaluate whether ABC can plausibly assert a BFOQ defense based on privacy or patient expectations.

    · Discuss the narrowness of the BFOQ exception and whether it applies to supervisory roles where the employee may not personally provide intimate medical care.

    · Identify factors courts examine when employers claim that sex is essential to job performance.

    3. Evaluation of Employer Risk

    Analyze ABC’s potential exposure under Title VII by considering:

    · The internal emails and whether they undermine the employer’s explanation.

    · The distinction between affirmative action goals and sex-based decision-making.

    · Whether less restrictive measures could address patient privacy concerns.

    · The likelihood of a court finding pretext or improper reliance on sex.

    4. Recommendations for HR Practice

    Provide specific recommendations for:

    · Structuring affirmative action plans to avoid impermissible preferences.

    · Documenting promotion decisions in compliance with Title VII.

    · Revising job descriptions when privacy considerations may be implicated.

    · Training managers on affirmative action limits and BFOQ restrictions.

    5. APA and Scholarly Sources

    Your paper must include:

    · APA-formatted title page and reference page.

    · APA headings throughout.

    · At least five scholarly/peer-reviewed sources, including legal cases or law review articles.

    Again, your essay should be at least 1,000 words. Use a legible font—preferably 12 pt, Times New Roman. one-inch margins. Pursuant to APA style rules, please be sure to include a properly formatted reference list at the end of your essay with at least five (5) credible sources.

    **## samweek3assignment.docx**

    For this assignment, you will write a minimum 1,000-word analytical essay evaluating a workplace scenario involving affirmative action and bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) issues. You will analyze potential Title VII liability, the validity of employer justifications, and the risks associated with the promotion decision.

    Your paper must follow APA 7th edition format and incorporate at least five scholarly sources.

    **Scenario**

    _ABC Medical Center (ABC) is a midsize hospital that receives federal research funding. As a federal contractor, ABC is required to maintain an affirmative action plan (AAP) under Executive Order 11246. A recent OFCCP audit revealed underrepresentation of women in certain supervisory positions, including areas of patient care involving intimate medical services. ABC was instructed to review its recruitment and promotion processes and ensure that qualified individuals were receiving fair consideration._

    _A supervisory role in the Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB/GYN) unit became vacant. Two internal candidates were selected as finalists:_

    ·
    _Applicant A: A male nurse with 12 years at ABC, excellent performance reviews, and prior leadership experience._

    ·
    _Applicant B: A female nurse with four years of experience and strong evaluations._

    _After interviews, ABC promoted Applicant B. Internal emails among decision-makers stated that:_

    ·
    _“A female supervisor in OB/GYN aligns more naturally with patient expectations.”_

    ·
    _“Privacy concerns in intimate medical settings may favor female leadership.”_

    ·
    _“Increasing female representation in supervisory roles supports the goals of our updated affirmative action plan.”_

    _Applicant A has filed a Title VII sex discrimination complaint. He argues that ABC improperly used sex as a deciding factor and that the hospital is attempting to justify discrimination by referencing its affirmative action plan and patient preferences. He further alleges that ABC is wrongly treating sex as a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) when the supervisory role does not require providing intimate patient care personally._

    _ABC leadership contends that:_

    1.
    _Their AAP allows consideration of representation data when selecting among multiple qualified candidates._

    2.
    _Patient comfort in OB/GYN units often involves privacy concerns that may justify considering sex._

    3.
    _Supervisory oversight in sensitive clinical areas may involve duties that relate directly to these privacy considerations._

    **Assignment Instructions**

    Write a 1,000+ word APA-formatted essay analyzing the scenario above. Your paper must address the following components:

    1. Legal Analysis of the Affirmative Action Issue

    · Explain the legal standards governing voluntary affirmative action plans under Title VII.

    · Analyze whether ABC’s AAP can lawfully influence a promotion decision.

    · Assess whether the hospital’s reasoning fits within permissible affirmative action principles (e.g., Weber, Johnson) or crosses into unlawful sex-based preference.

    2. Legal Analysis of the BFOQ Issue

    · Evaluate whether ABC can plausibly assert a BFOQ defense based on privacy or patient expectations.

    · Discuss the narrowness of the BFOQ exception and whether it applies to supervisory roles where the employee may not personally provide intimate medical care.

    · Identify factors courts examine when employers claim that sex is essential to job performance.

    3. Evaluation of Employer Risk

    Analyze ABC’s potential exposure under Title VII by considering:

    · The internal emails and whether they undermine the employer’s explanation.

    · The distinction between affirmative action goals and sex-based decision-making.

    · Whether less restrictive measures could address patient privacy concerns.

    · The likelihood of a court finding pretext or improper reliance on sex.

    4. Recommendations for HR Practice

    Provide specific recommendations for:

    · Structuring affirmative action plans to avoid impermissible preferences.

    · Documenting promotion decisions in compliance with Title VII.

    · Revising job descriptions when privacy considerations may be implicated.

    · Training managers on affirmative action limits and BFOQ restrictions.

    5. APA and Scholarly Sources

    Your paper must include:

    · APA-formatted title page and reference page.

    · APA headings throughout.

    · At least five scholarly/peer-reviewed sources, including legal cases or law review articles.

    Again, your essay should be at least 1,000 words. Use a legible font—preferably 12 pt, Times New Roman. one-inch margins. Pursuant to APA style rules, please be sure to include a properly formatted reference list at the end of your essay with at least five (5) credible sources.

  • [Solved] plagiarism free dissertation help ?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Buy Dissertations is an online academic support platform that helps students handle the challenges of dissertation writing. The service connects students with experienced academic writers who provide guidance, research support, editing, and structured dissertation assistance across different subject…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Buy Dissertations is an online academic support platform that helps students handle the challenges of dissertation writing. The service connects students with experienced academic writers who provide guidance, research support, editing, and structured dissertation assistance across different subjects. Our goal is to make the dissertation process smoother by delivering well-researched, original, and properly formatted work on time. With reliable support and clear communication, Buy Dissertations helps students stay confident while completing their important academic projects.

    Visit:  https://buydissertations.co.uk/services/assignment-service/

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] neva newsletter

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment – a month ago **files (1)** – ## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx **## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx** The Revolutionary in Your Field Assignment Overview For this assignment, you will research a person who fundamentally changed, challenged, disrupted, or revolutionized a fi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    – a month ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx

    **## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx**

    The Revolutionary in Your Field

    Assignment Overview

    For this assignment, you will research a person who fundamentally changed, challenged, disrupted, or revolutionized a field of study or professional discipline. You will transform your research into a polished, two-page academic newsletter using Canva.

    This is a research-based argument, not a biography.

    Your central task is to make an argument about the significance of your chosen person’s work. Your newsletter should persuade an educated reader that this individual deserves to be considered revolutionary within their field.

    Your writing should demonstrate the skills expected in Composition II: research, synthesis, analysis, argumentation, organization, audience awareness, and revision.

    Learning Objectives

    By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your ability to:

    · Develop a focused, arguable thesis.

    · Conduct purposeful academic research.

    · Evaluate the credibility and relevance of sources.

    · Synthesize information from multiple sources.

    · Distinguish between summary and analysis.

    · Integrate evidence into your own argument.

    · Analyze the significance of a person’s contributions.

    · Write for a specific audience and purpose.

    · Use rhetorical strategies effectively.

    · Apply proper grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and sentence structure.

    · Design information visually without allowing design to replace substantive writing.

    The Central Question

    Your newsletter must answer:

    To what extent did this person revolutionize their field, and why does their impact continue to matter?

    You should not simply tell your reader what the person accomplished.

    You must interpret the significance of those accomplishments.

    For example, instead of writing:

    “Katherine Johnson calculated flight trajectories for NASA.”

    You might argue:

    “Katherine Johnson’s mathematical work did more than support individual NASA missions; it demonstrated the importance of mathematical precision in human spaceflight while challenging racial and gender barriers within American scientific institutions.”

    The second statement makes an argument that can be supported with research.

    Part I: Selecting Your Subject

    Choose a person whose work produced a meaningful change within a specific field.

    Your subject may come from:

    · Science

    · Medicine

    · Technology

    · Engineering

    · Mathematics

    · Education

    · Literature

    · History

    · Psychology

    · Business

    · Law

    · Politics

    · Art

    · Music

    · Communications

    · Sports

    · Other fields approved by your instructor

    Your person must have made a substantial contribution to the field.

    Avoid choosing someone solely because they are famous.

    Your research should establish what makes the person revolutionary.

    Part II: Develop an Arguable Thesis

    Your newsletter must contain a clear thesis.

    Your thesis should make a claim about your person’s significance rather than simply announcing what the newsletter will discuss.

    Weak Thesis

    “Marie Curie was an important scientist who made many discoveries.”

    Stronger Thesis

    “Marie Curie’s research on radioactivity revolutionized modern science by expanding the understanding of atomic phenomena, establishing new approaches to medical treatment, and challenging the limitations placed on women in scientific research.”

    Your thesis should provide your reader with a position that your research will prove or develop.

    Part III: Research Requirements

    You must use a minimum of 4 credible sources.

    At least 2 sources must be scholarly or academic sources, such as:

    · Peer-reviewed journal articles

    · Academic books

    · University publications

    · Government publications

    · Reputable research institutions

    The remaining sources may include credible:

    · Newspapers

    · Museums

    · Professional organizations

    · Documentaries

    · Major reference databases

    · Reputable websites

    Wikipedia may be used to locate background information or additional sources, but it does not count as one of your four required sources.

    You are responsible for evaluating the credibility of your sources.

    Consider:

    · Who produced the information?

    · What qualifications does the author or organization have?

    · What evidence is provided?

    · When was the information published or updated?

    · What purpose does the source serve?

    · Is the information supported by other credible sources?

    Part IV: Source Synthesis

    Your newsletter must demonstrate synthesis.

    Do not organize your research as:

    Source 1 says…

    Source 2 says…

    Source 3 says…

    Instead, bring sources together to develop your own ideas.

    For example:

    Historians have emphasized both the scientific significance of Curie’s research and the institutional barriers she encountered. Her discoveries expanded scientific knowledge of radioactivity, while her career demonstrated the difficulties women faced when attempting to establish authority within scientific institutions.

    The goal is for your analysis to control the research, rather than allowing the sources to control your writing.

    Part V: Required Newsletter Content

    Your newsletter must contain the following sections.

    1. Headline

    Create an engaging headline that reflects your argument.

    Avoid generic titles such as:

    “The Life of Albert Einstein.”

    Instead, consider:

    “Rewriting the Rules of Physics: Einstein’s Revolution in Modern Science”

    2. Introduction

    Introduce your subject, field, and central argument.

    Your introduction should establish:

    · Who the person was

    · Their field

    · The major issue or development associated with their work

    · Why their contribution matters

    · Your thesis

    3. Context: The Field Before the Revolution

    Explain what the field looked like before your subject’s major contribution.

    This section is important because readers cannot understand a revolution without understanding what changed.

    Address questions such as:

    · What were the dominant ideas?

    · What problems existed?

    · What limitations existed?

    · What did people previously believe?

    · What technological, cultural, or institutional conditions existed?

    4. The Revolutionary Contribution

    Identify the person’s most significant contribution.

    Explain:

    · What they did

    · How they did it

    · What problem they addressed

    · What made the contribution different

    · What evidence demonstrates its importance

    Avoid simply listing accomplishments.

    Analyze their significance.

    5. Impact on the Field

    Explain how the person’s work changed the discipline.

    Consider:

    · New theories

    · New technologies

    · New practices

    · New research methods

    · Changes in public understanding

    · Changes in professional practices

    · Influence on later researchers

    · Institutional or cultural changes

    Your reader should understand the before-and-after effect of the person’s work.

    6. Challenges, Opposition, or Limitations

    A sophisticated argument should acknowledge complexity.

    Discuss at least one significant challenge, criticism, limitation, controversy, or obstacle associated with the person’s work or career.

    Then analyze its significance.

    This section should prevent your newsletter from becoming a simple “great person” profile.

    7. Lasting Legacy

    Explain why this person still matters.

    Connect their historical contribution to the present.

    Ask:

    What would this field look like today if this person had never made their contribution?

    You do not have to claim that one individual single-handedly changed an entire field. Instead, evaluate their degree of influence.

    8. Conclusion

    Return to your thesis.

    Your conclusion should not simply repeat your introduction.

    Instead:

    · Synthesize your major findings.

    · Reinforce your argument.

    · Explain the broader significance of the person’s contribution.

    · Leave the reader with a meaningful final insight.

    Part VI: Evidence and Analysis

    Your newsletter must maintain a balance between evidence and your own analysis.

    Use research to support your claims, but explain why the evidence matters.

    A useful pattern is:

    Claim → Evidence → Analysis → Significance

    Ask yourself:

    “So what?”

    After presenting an important fact, explain why that fact matters to your argument.

    Part VII: MLA Documentation

    Because this is Composition II, your research should demonstrate academic documentation skills.

    Use MLA format for:

    · In-text citations

    · Works Cited

    Your newsletter must include a Works Cited section containing your sources.

    Your sources should also be documented throughout the newsletter when you use information, ideas, statistics, or quotations from them.

    Part VIII: Visual Rhetoric

    Your Canva design is part of the assignment’s rhetoric.

    Include relevant visuals that help communicate your argument.

    Possible visuals include:

    · Photographs

    · Historical documents

    · Charts

    · Graphs

    · Timelines

    · Diagrams

    · Maps

    · Images of inventions or discoveries

    · Primary-source images

    Do not use visuals simply to decorate the page.

    Each major visual should have a purpose.

    Ask:

    How does this visual help my reader understand my argument?

    Where appropriate, include a brief caption explaining the significance of the visual.

    Part IX: Required Mechanics

    Your newsletter must demonstrate intentional control of written language.

    You must correctly use:

    Commas

    Minimum: 4

    Semicolons

    Minimum: 3

    Colons

    Minimum: 3

    These punctuation marks must be used correctly and purposefully.

    Incorrect or artificially inserted punctuation will not satisfy the requirement.

    Your newsletter must also demonstrate:

    · Correct capitalization

    · Complete sentences

    · Appropriate paragraph structure

    · Correct subject-verb agreement

    · Appropriate verb tense

    · Correct pronoun usage

    · Appropriate transitions

    · Proper quotation integration

    · Correct spelling

    · Appropriate academic vocabulary

    Part X: Two-Page Minimum

    Your newsletter must be a minimum of two full pages.

    The two-page requirement applies to substantive writing, not simply visual design.

    Do not manipulate:

    · Font size

    · Margins

    · Line spacing

    · Images

    · Text boxes

    to artificially create additional pages.

    Your instructor may require additional length if the research and analysis cannot be adequately developed within two pages.

    Composition II Standard

    Your newsletter should demonstrate the difference between summary and analysis.

    Summary asks:

    What happened?

    Analysis asks:

    Why did it happen?

    Why was it significant?

    What changed because of it?

    What evidence supports that interpretation?

    What are the limitations of that interpretation?

    Why should the reader care?

    Your newsletter should prioritize analysis over biography.

    **## TheRevolutionaryinYourField.docx**

    The Revolutionary in Your Field

    Assignment Overview

    For this assignment, you will research a person who fundamentally changed, challenged, disrupted, or revolutionized a field of study or professional discipline. You will transform your research into a polished, two-page academic newsletter using Canva.

    This is a research-based argument, not a biography.

    Your central task is to make an argument about the significance of your chosen person’s work. Your newsletter should persuade an educated reader that this individual deserves to be considered revolutionary within their field.

    Your writing should demonstrate the skills expected in Composition II: research, synthesis, analysis, argumentation, organization, audience awareness, and revision.

    Learning Objectives

    By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your ability to:

    · Develop a focused, arguable thesis.

    · Conduct purposeful academic research.

    · Evaluate the credibility and relevance of sources.

    · Synthesize information from multiple sources.

    · Distinguish between summary and analysis.

    · Integrate evidence into your own argument.

    · Analyze the significance of a person’s contributions.

    · Write for a specific audience and purpose.

    · Use rhetorical strategies effectively.

    · Apply proper grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and sentence structure.

    · Design information visually without allowing design to replace substantive writing.

    The Central Question

    Your newsletter must answer:

    To what extent did this person revolutionize their field, and why does their impact continue to matter?

    You should not simply tell your reader what the person accomplished.

    You must interpret the significance of those accomplishments.

    For example, instead of writing:

    “Katherine Johnson calculated flight trajectories for NASA.”

    You might argue:

    “Katherine Johnson’s mathematical work did more than support individual NASA missions; it demonstrated the importance of mathematical precision in human spaceflight while challenging racial and gender barriers within American scientific institutions.”

    The second statement makes an argument that can be supported with research.

    Part I: Selecting Your Subject

    Choose a person whose work produced a meaningful change within a specific field.

    Your subject may come from:

    · Science

    · Medicine

    · Technology

    · Engineering

    · Mathematics

    · Education

    · Literature

    · History

    · Psychology

    · Business

    · Law

    · Politics

    · Art

    · Music

    · Communications

    · Sports

    · Other fields approved by your instructor

    Your person must have made a substantial contribution to the field.

    Avoid choosing someone solely because they are famous.

    Your research should establish what makes the person revolutionary.

    Part II: Develop an Arguable Thesis

    Your newsletter must contain a clear thesis.

    Your thesis should make a claim about your person’s significance rather than simply announcing what the newsletter will discuss.

    Weak Thesis

    “Marie Curie was an important scientist who made many discoveries.”

    Stronger Thesis

    “Marie Curie’s research on radioactivity revolutionized modern science by expanding the understanding of atomic phenomena, establishing new approaches to medical treatment, and challenging the limitations placed on women in scientific research.”

    Your thesis should provide your reader with a position that your research will prove or develop.

    Part III: Research Requirements

    You must use a minimum of 4 credible sources.

    At least 2 sources must be scholarly or academic sources, such as:

    · Peer-reviewed journal articles

    · Academic books

    · University publications

    · Government publications

    · Reputable research institutions

    The remaining sources may include credible:

    · Newspapers

    · Museums

    · Professional organizations

    · Documentaries

    · Major reference databases

    · Reputable websites

    Wikipedia may be used to locate background information or additional sources, but it does not count as one of your four required sources.

    You are responsible for evaluating the credibility of your sources.

    Consider:

    · Who produced the information?

    · What qualifications does the author or organization have?

    · What evidence is provided?

    · When was the information published or updated?

    · What purpose does the source serve?

    · Is the information supported by other credible sources?

    Part IV: Source Synthesis

    Your newsletter must demonstrate synthesis.

    Do not organize your research as:

    Source 1 says…

    Source 2 says…

    Source 3 says…

    Instead, bring sources together to develop your own ideas.

    For example:

    Historians have emphasized both the scientific significance of Curie’s research and the institutional barriers she encountered. Her discoveries expanded scientific knowledge of radioactivity, while her career demonstrated the difficulties women faced when attempting to establish authority within scientific institutions.

    The goal is for your analysis to control the research, rather than allowing the sources to control your writing.

    Part V: Required Newsletter Content

    Your newsletter must contain the following sections.

    1. Headline

    Create an engaging headline that reflects your argument.

    Avoid generic titles such as:

    “The Life of Albert Einstein.”

    Instead, consider:

    “Rewriting the Rules of Physics: Einstein’s Revolution in Modern Science”

    2. Introduction

    Introduce your subject, field, and central argument.

    Your introduction should establish:

    · Who the person was

    · Their field

    · The major issue or development associated with their work

    · Why their contribution matters

    · Your thesis

    3. Context: The Field Before the Revolution

    Explain what the field looked like before your subject’s major contribution.

    This section is important because readers cannot understand a revolution without understanding what changed.

    Address questions such as:

    · What were the dominant ideas?

    · What problems existed?

    · What limitations existed?

    · What did people previously believe?

    · What technological, cultural, or institutional conditions existed?

    4. The Revolutionary Contribution

    Identify the person’s most significant contribution.

    Explain:

    · What they did

    · How they did it

    · What problem they addressed

    · What made the contribution different

    · What evidence demonstrates its importance

    Avoid simply listing accomplishments.

    Analyze their significance.

    5. Impact on the Field

    Explain how the person’s work changed the discipline.

    Consider:

    · New theories

    · New technologies

    · New practices

    · New research methods

    · Changes in public understanding

    · Changes in professional practices

    · Influence on later researchers

    · Institutional or cultural changes

    Your reader should understand the before-and-after effect of the person’s work.

    6. Challenges, Opposition, or Limitations

    A sophisticated argument should acknowledge complexity.

    Discuss at least one significant challenge, criticism, limitation, controversy, or obstacle associated with the person’s work or career.

    Then analyze its significance.

    This section should prevent your newsletter from becoming a simple “great person” profile.

    7. Lasting Legacy

    Explain why this person still matters.

    Connect their historical contribution to the present.

    Ask:

    What would this field look like today if this person had never made their contribution?

    You do not have to claim that one individual single-handedly changed an entire field. Instead, evaluate their degree of influence.

    8. Conclusion

    Return to your thesis.

    Your conclusion should not simply repeat your introduction.

    Instead:

    · Synthesize your major findings.

    · Reinforce your argument.

    · Explain the broader significance of the person’s contribution.

    · Leave the reader with a meaningful final insight.

    Part VI: Evidence and Analysis

    Your newsletter must maintain a balance between evidence and your own analysis.

    Use research to support your claims, but explain why the evidence matters.

    A useful pattern is:

    Claim → Evidence → Analysis → Significance

    Ask yourself:

    “So what?”

    After presenting an important fact, explain why that fact matters to your argument.

    Part VII: MLA Documentation

    Because this is Composition II, your research should demonstrate academic documentation skills.

    Use MLA format for:

    · In-text citations

    · Works Cited

    Your newsletter must include a Works Cited section containing your sources.

    Your sources should also be documented throughout the newsletter when you use information, ideas, statistics, or quotations from them.

    Part VIII: Visual Rhetoric

    Your Canva design is part of the assignment’s rhetoric.

    Include relevant visuals that help communicate your argument.

    Possible visuals include:

    · Photographs

    · Historical documents

    · Charts

    · Graphs

    · Timelines

    · Diagrams

    · Maps

    · Images of inventions or discoveries

    · Primary-source images

    Do not use visuals simply to decorate the page.

    Each major visual should have a purpose.

    Ask:

    How does this visual help my reader understand my argument?

    Where appropriate, include a brief caption explaining the significance of the visual.

    Part IX: Required Mechanics

    Your newsletter must demonstrate intentional control of written language.

    You must correctly use:

    Commas

    Minimum: 4

    Semicolons

    Minimum: 3

    Colons

    Minimum: 3

    These punctuation marks must be used correctly and purposefully.

    Incorrect or artificially inserted punctuation will not satisfy the requirement.

    Your newsletter must also demonstrate:

    · Correct capitalization

    · Complete sentences

    · Appropriate paragraph structure

    · Correct subject-verb agreement

    · Appropriate verb tense

    · Correct pronoun usage

    · Appropriate transitions

    · Proper quotation integration

    · Correct spelling

    · Appropriate academic vocabulary

    Part X: Two-Page Minimum

    Your newsletter must be a minimum of two full pages.

    The two-page requirement applies to substantive writing, not simply visual design.

    Do not manipulate:

    · Font size

    · Margins

    · Line spacing

    · Images

    · Text boxes

    to artificially create additional pages.

    Your instructor may require additional length if the research and analysis cannot be adequately developed within two pages.

    Composition II Standard

    Your newsletter should demonstrate the difference between summary and analysis.

    Summary asks:

    What happened?

    Analysis asks:

    Why did it happen?

    Why was it significant?

    What changed because of it?

    What evidence supports that interpretation?

    What are the limitations of that interpretation?

    Why should the reader care?

    Your newsletter should prioritize analysis over biography.

  • [Solved] t brumsey

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Assignment** For this assignment, you will write a **professional email to a person you consider revolutionary in your chosen field of study or career field**. Your goal is not simply to tell this person that you admire them. Instead, you will use their experiences, accomplishments, and influence …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Assignment**

    For this assignment, you will write a **professional email to a person you consider revolutionary in your chosen field of study or career field**. Your goal is not simply to tell this person that you admire them. Instead, you will use their experiences, accomplishments, and influence as the foundation for a thoughtful reflection on **your own academic and professional development**.

    Your email should demonstrate that you can **analyze a person’s impact, connect their experiences to your own development, and articulate how their influence may shape your future career.**

    **Your Email Must Address:**

    **1. Establish Their Significance**

    Identify the person you selected and make an argument about **why they should be considered revolutionary in their field**.

    Consider:

    – What did they change, challenge, create, or accomplish?
    – What was the field like before their contribution?
    – What makes their influence significant?
    – Who has been affected by their work?

    Avoid simply listing accomplishments. **Explain why those accomplishments matter.**

    **2. Analyze What You Admire**

    Identify specific qualities, decisions, beliefs, or accomplishments that you admire.

    Then explain **why** you admire them.

    For example, instead of writing:

    “I admire their determination.”

    Explain what they encountered, how they responded, and why that response is meaningful to you.

    **3. Connect Their Journey to Your Own**

    Analyze the relationship between their struggles, failures, challenges, or successes and your own academic or professional journey.

    Consider:

    – What challenges have you faced that help you understand their journey?
    – What experiences have shaped your own career goals?
    – Where are your experiences similar or different?
    – What can you learn from the choices they made?

    Your connection should go beyond simply saying, **“I can relate to them.”** Explain the connection.

    **4. Apply Their Influence to Your Future**

    Explain how you intend to use this person’s example as you move forward in your education and career.

    Discuss:

    – What specific lessons will you apply?
    – What habits, values, or strategies will you adopt?
    – How might their example influence your decisions?
    – What do you hope to accomplish in your own field?

    **Research Requirement**

    Your email must incorporate **at least two credible sources** about the person you selected.

    Use the sources to support your understanding of their:

    – Background
    – Accomplishments
    – Challenges
    – Influence
    – Contributions to their field

    You should **paraphrase and synthesize** information rather than simply inserting quotations.

    Include a brief **Works Cited/References section** using the citation style appropriate for your course.

    **Rhetorical Expectations**

    Because this is a Composition II assignment, you should think carefully about your **audience, purpose, tone, and rhetorical choices**.

    Your email should:

    – Establish a clear purpose
    – Maintain a professional tone
    – Use specific and relevant evidence
    – Demonstrate analysis rather than summary
    – Create a meaningful connection between the revolutionary’s experiences and your own goals
    – End with a clear sense of how their influence will shape your future

    **Length**

    **750–1,000 words**

    The email should be developed enough to demonstrate **analysis, synthesis, and reflection**, rather than simply answering each question separately.

    **Suggested Organization**

    **Subject:** The Influence of [Name] on My Career Goals

    **Dear [Name],**

    **Introduction:** Introduce yourself, identify the person, and establish your central reason for writing.

    **Body Paragraph 1:** Explain why this person is revolutionary in their field. Use research to establish their significance.

    **Body Paragraph 2:** Analyze what you admire about their journey, decisions, accomplishments, or character.

    **Body Paragraph 3:** Connect their struggles or successes to your own experiences and development.

    **Body Paragraph 4:** Explain how you will apply lessons from their influence to your education and future career.

    **Conclusion:** Reflect on the significance of their influence and leave the reader with a clear statement about the professional you hope to become.

    **Sincerely,**

    [Your Name]

    **Final Question to Consider**

    Before submitting, ask yourself:

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] sharice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment For the Introduction Art Historical Critique Assignment, you will be analyzing the Parthenon in Athens, Greece. – [\ \ ARTH209InstructionsfortheIntrodcutionArtHistoricalCrtique-22.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/arth209instructionsfortheintrodcutionarthistoricalcrtique-…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    For the Introduction Art Historical Critique Assignment, you will be analyzing the Parthenon in Athens, Greece.

    – [\
    \
    ARTH209InstructionsfortheIntrodcutionArtHistoricalCrtique-22.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/arth209instructionsfortheintrodcutionarthistoricalcrtique-22-pdf "ARTH209InstructionsfortheIntrodcutionArtHistoricalCrtique-22.pdf")

    – a month ago

  • [Solved] lilly

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment. Answer as a grad student and a middle school science teacher at River Road Middle School in elizabeth city NC 27909 – [\ \ LillyIndividualAssignmentAssignment2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lillyindividualassignmentassignment2-docx "LillyIndividualAssignmentAssignme…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment. Answer as a grad student and a middle school science teacher at River Road Middle School in elizabeth city NC 27909

    – [\
    \
    LillyIndividualAssignmentAssignment2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lillyindividualassignmentassignment2-docx "LillyIndividualAssignmentAssignment2.docx")

    – a month ago