Executive Solution Overview
– 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## assessment.docx – ## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx – ## XD3001_Rubric.pdf **## assessment.docx** **ASSESSMENT** Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. [Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/cont…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (3)**
– ## assessment.docx
– ## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx
– ## XD3001_Rubric.pdf
**## assessment.docx**
**ASSESSMENT**
Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.
[Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)
In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.
**To Prepare:**
· Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.
· Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.
· Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.
[To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.
**Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
· Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
· Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
**Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
· Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
· Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
· Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
· Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
**Note:** Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
**Complete and Submit.**
**## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx**
**Analyzing Personal Bias**
Student Name Here
RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University
Course:
Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
XD3001:
_Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect_
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)
Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.
**Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
· Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
· Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
**Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
· Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
· Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
· Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
· Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
**Note:** Do not include
introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
**References**
**Note:** You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 3
**image1.png**
**## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
impacts relationships and communication with team members.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Explain your understanding of
the foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
concepts of diversity, equity, and
inclusion
Response does not
adequately explain
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
Response adequately
explains individual
understanding of the
foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and
inclusion.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
• Explain how you define the
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of
cultural differences.
Learning Objective 1.2: Define
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of culture
Response does not
adequately explain
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response adequately
explains definitions of
the concepts of
advantage and
disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
• Describe a situation when you
responded to differences in
others with a sense of
Response does not
adequately explain
factors that contribute to
perceptions of
Response adequately
explains factors that
contribute to perceptions
of advantage or
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
factors that contribute to
perceptions of advantage
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
advantage or disadvantage.
Explain the factors that
contributed to that perception.
Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
that influence perceptions of
advantage or disadvantage in
situations with others
advantage or
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
or disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to differences
in others.
Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare
Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Summarize insights you gained
from your Project Implicit Test
results.
Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
insights from results of personal bias
tests
Response does not
adequately summarize
insights from Project
Implicit Test results.
Response adequately
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
Response accurately
and thoroughly
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
• Analyze how your personal
biases and values influence your
thinking and behavior. Be
specific with examples.
Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
influence of individual biases and
values on thinking and behavior
Response does not
adequately analyze with
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response adequately
analyzes with specific
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response accurately
and thoroughly analyzes
with specific examples
how personal biases and
values influence thinking
and behavior.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe a situation when you
communicated with others in a
biased way or experienced
communication that was biased.
Apply your understanding of
personal bias to explain this
example.
Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
understanding of personal bias to
examples of biased communication
Response does not
adequately describe a
situation when
communication was
biased and/or
adequately apply
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response adequately
describes a situation
when communication
was biased and
adequately applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response accurately
and thoroughly describes
a situation when
communication was
biased and accurately
and thoroughly applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
• Explain your thoughts and
feelings about the value of
examining your personal
biases—both as an individual
and as a professional in the
healthcare field.
Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
value of examining personal biases as
an individual and healthcare
professional
Response does not
adequately explain
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response adequately
explains thoughts and
feelings about the value
of examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 4
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe at least two (2)
strategies for combatting implicit
bias that you would choose for
yourself. Explain your reasoning.
Note: Do not include
introspection as a strategy,
which you have applied and
summarized through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
strategies to combat implicit bias
Response does not
adequately explain the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and/or
includes introspection as
a strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response adequately
explains the individual
choice of at least two (2)
strategies to apply for
combatting implicit bias
and does not include
introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and does not
include introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Professional Skills Assessment
Professional Writing
Professional Writing:
Clarity, Flow, and
Organization
Content contains significant
spelling, punctuation, and/or
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not
demonstrate adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and requires
additional
editing/proofreading. Key
sections of presented
content lack clarity, logical
flow, and/or organization.
Content contains few
spelling, punctuation,
and/or grammar/syntax
errors. Writing
demonstrates adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and may require
some editing. Content
presented is satisfactorily
clear, logical, and/or
organized, but could
benefit from additional
editing/revision.
Content is free from
spelling, punctuation, and
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates
appropriate sentence and
paragraph structure.
Content presented is clear,
logical, and well-organized.
Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 5
Context, Audience,
Purpose, and Tone
not demonstrate awareness
of context, audience, and/or
purpose. Writing is not
reflective of
professional/scholarly tone
and/or is not free of bias.
Style is inconsistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context
and reflects the need for
additional editing.
satisfactory awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is
adequately professional,
scholarly, and/or free from
bias, and style is mostly
consistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context.
demonstrates awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is highly
professional, scholarly, and
free from bias, and style is
appropriate for the
professional
setting/workplace context.
Professional Writing:
Originality, Source
Credibility, and Attribution
of Ideas
Content does not
adequately reflect original
writing and/or paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates
inconsistent adherence to
reference requirements,
including the use of credible
evidence to support a claim,
with appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and reference. There are
numerous and/or significant
errors.
Content adequately reflects
original writing and
paraphrasing. Writing
demonstrates adequate
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when
applicable) and references.
There are one or two minor
errors.
Content reflects original
thought and writing and
proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and references.
**## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
impacts relationships and communication with team members.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Explain your understanding of
the foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
concepts of diversity, equity, and
inclusion
Response does not
adequately explain
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
Response adequately
explains individual
understanding of the
foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and
inclusion.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
• Explain how you define the
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of
cultural differences.
Learning Objective 1.2: Define
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of culture
Response does not
adequately explain
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response adequately
explains definitions of
the concepts of
advantage and
disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
• Describe a situation when you
responded to differences in
others with a sense of
Response does not
adequately explain
factors that contribute to
perceptions of
Response adequately
explains factors that
contribute to perceptions
of advantage or
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
factors that contribute to
perceptions of advantage
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
advantage or disadvantage.
Explain the factors that
contributed to that perception.
Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
that influence perceptions of
advantage or disadvantage in
situations with others
advantage or
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
or disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to differences
in others.
Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare
Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Summarize insights you gained
from your Project Implicit Test
results.
Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
insights from results of personal bias
tests
Response does not
adequately summarize
insights from Project
Implicit Test results.
Response adequately
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
Response accurately
and thoroughly
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
• Analyze how your personal
biases and values influence your
thinking and behavior. Be
specific with examples.
Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
influence of individual biases and
values on thinking and behavior
Response does not
adequately analyze with
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response adequately
analyzes with specific
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response accurately
and thoroughly analyzes
with specific examples
how personal biases and
values influence thinking
and behavior.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe a situation when you
communicated with others in a
biased way or experienced
communication that was biased.
Apply your understanding of
personal bias to explain this
example.
Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
understanding of personal bias to
examples of biased communication
Response does not
adequately describe a
situation when
communication was
biased and/or
adequately apply
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response adequately
describes a situation
when communication
was biased and
adequately applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response accurately
and thoroughly describes
a situation when
communication was
biased and accurately
and thoroughly applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
• Explain your thoughts and
feelings about the value of
examining your personal
biases—both as an individual
and as a professional in the
healthcare field.
Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
value of examining personal biases as
an individual and healthcare
professional
Response does not
adequately explain
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response adequately
explains thoughts and
feelings about the value
of examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 4
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe at least two (2)
strategies for combatting implicit
bias that you would choose for
yourself. Explain your reasoning.
Note: Do not include
introspection as a strategy,
which you have applied and
summarized through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
strategies to combat implicit bias
Response does not
adequately explain the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and/or
includes introspection as
a strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response adequately
explains the individual
choice of at least two (2)
strategies to apply for
combatting implicit bias
and does not include
introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and does not
include introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Professional Skills Assessment
Professional Writing
Professional Writing:
Clarity, Flow, and
Organization
Content contains significant
spelling, punctuation, and/or
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not
demonstrate adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and requires
additional
editing/proofreading. Key
sections of presented
content lack clarity, logical
flow, and/or organization.
Content contains few
spelling, punctuation,
and/or grammar/syntax
errors. Writing
demonstrates adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and may require
some editing. Content
presented is satisfactorily
clear, logical, and/or
organized, but could
benefit from additional
editing/revision.
Content is free from
spelling, punctuation, and
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates
appropriate sentence and
paragraph structure.
Content presented is clear,
logical, and well-organized.
Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 5
Context, Audience,
Purpose, and Tone
not demonstrate awareness
of context, audience, and/or
purpose. Writing is not
reflective of
professional/scholarly tone
and/or is not free of bias.
Style is inconsistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context
and reflects the need for
additional editing.
satisfactory awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is
adequately professional,
scholarly, and/or free from
bias, and style is mostly
consistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context.
demonstrates awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is highly
professional, scholarly, and
free from bias, and style is
appropriate for the
professional
setting/workplace context.
Professional Writing:
Originality, Source
Credibility, and Attribution
of Ideas
Content does not
adequately reflect original
writing and/or paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates
inconsistent adherence to
reference requirements,
including the use of credible
evidence to support a claim,
with appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and reference. There are
numerous and/or significant
errors.
Content adequately reflects
original writing and
paraphrasing. Writing
demonstrates adequate
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when
applicable) and references.
There are one or two minor
errors.
Content reflects original
thought and writing and
proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and references.
**## assessment.docx**
**ASSESSMENT**
Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.
[Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)
In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.
**To Prepare:**
· Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.
· Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.
· Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.
[To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.
**Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
· Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
· Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
**Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
· Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
· Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
· Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
· Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
**Note:** Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
**Complete and Submit.**
**## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx**
**Analyzing Personal Bias**
Student Name Here
RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University
Course:
Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
XD3001:
_Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect_
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)
Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.
**Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
· Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
· Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
**Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
· Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
· Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
· Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
· Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
**Note:** Do not include
introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
**References**
**Note:** You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 3
**image1.png**
**## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
impacts relationships and communication with team members.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Explain your understanding of
the foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
concepts of diversity, equity, and
inclusion
Response does not
adequately explain
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
Response adequately
explains individual
understanding of the
foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and
inclusion.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
• Explain how you define the
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of
cultural differences.
Learning Objective 1.2: Define
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of culture
Response does not
adequately explain
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response adequately
explains definitions of
the concepts of
advantage and
disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
• Describe a situation when you
responded to differences in
others with a sense of
Response does not
adequately explain
factors that contribute to
perceptions of
Response adequately
explains factors that
contribute to perceptions
of advantage or
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
factors that contribute to
perceptions of advantage
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
advantage or disadvantage.
Explain the factors that
contributed to that perception.
Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
that influence perceptions of
advantage or disadvantage in
situations with others
advantage or
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
or disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to differences
in others.
Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare
Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Summarize insights you gained
from your Project Implicit Test
results.
Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
insights from results of personal bias
tests
Response does not
adequately summarize
insights from Project
Implicit Test results.
Response adequately
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
Response accurately
and thoroughly
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
• Analyze how your personal
biases and values influence your
thinking and behavior. Be
specific with examples.
Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
influence of individual biases and
values on thinking and behavior
Response does not
adequately analyze with
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response adequately
analyzes with specific
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response accurately
and thoroughly analyzes
with specific examples
how personal biases and
values influence thinking
and behavior.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe a situation when you
communicated with others in a
biased way or experienced
communication that was biased.
Apply your understanding of
personal bias to explain this
example.
Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
understanding of personal bias to
examples of biased communication
Response does not
adequately describe a
situation when
communication was
biased and/or
adequately apply
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response adequately
describes a situation
when communication
was biased and
adequately applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response accurately
and thoroughly describes
a situation when
communication was
biased and accurately
and thoroughly applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
• Explain your thoughts and
feelings about the value of
examining your personal
biases—both as an individual
and as a professional in the
healthcare field.
Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
value of examining personal biases as
an individual and healthcare
professional
Response does not
adequately explain
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response adequately
explains thoughts and
feelings about the value
of examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 4
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe at least two (2)
strategies for combatting implicit
bias that you would choose for
yourself. Explain your reasoning.
Note: Do not include
introspection as a strategy,
which you have applied and
summarized through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
strategies to combat implicit bias
Response does not
adequately explain the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and/or
includes introspection as
a strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response adequately
explains the individual
choice of at least two (2)
strategies to apply for
combatting implicit bias
and does not include
introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and does not
include introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Professional Skills Assessment
Professional Writing
Professional Writing:
Clarity, Flow, and
Organization
Content contains significant
spelling, punctuation, and/or
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not
demonstrate adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and requires
additional
editing/proofreading. Key
sections of presented
content lack clarity, logical
flow, and/or organization.
Content contains few
spelling, punctuation,
and/or grammar/syntax
errors. Writing
demonstrates adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and may require
some editing. Content
presented is satisfactorily
clear, logical, and/or
organized, but could
benefit from additional
editing/revision.
Content is free from
spelling, punctuation, and
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates
appropriate sentence and
paragraph structure.
Content presented is clear,
logical, and well-organized.
Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 5
Context, Audience,
Purpose, and Tone
not demonstrate awareness
of context, audience, and/or
purpose. Writing is not
reflective of
professional/scholarly tone
and/or is not free of bias.
Style is inconsistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context
and reflects the need for
additional editing.
satisfactory awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is
adequately professional,
scholarly, and/or free from
bias, and style is mostly
consistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context.
demonstrates awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is highly
professional, scholarly, and
free from bias, and style is
appropriate for the
professional
setting/workplace context.
Professional Writing:
Originality, Source
Credibility, and Attribution
of Ideas
Content does not
adequately reflect original
writing and/or paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates
inconsistent adherence to
reference requirements,
including the use of credible
evidence to support a claim,
with appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and reference. There are
numerous and/or significant
errors.
Content adequately reflects
original writing and
paraphrasing. Writing
demonstrates adequate
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when
applicable) and references.
There are one or two minor
errors.
Content reflects original
thought and writing and
proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and references.
**## assessment.docx**
**ASSESSMENT**
Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.
[Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)
In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.
**To Prepare:**
· Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.
· Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.
· Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.
[To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.
**Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
· Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
· Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
**Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
· Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
· Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
· Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
· Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
**Note:** Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
**Complete and Submit.**
**## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx**
**Analyzing Personal Bias**
Student Name Here
RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University
Course:
Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
XD3001:
_Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect_
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)
Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.
**Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
· Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
· Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
**Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
· Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
· Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
· Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
· Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
**Note:** Do not include
introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
**References**
**Note:** You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 3
**image1.png**
**## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
impacts relationships and communication with team members.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Explain your understanding of
the foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
concepts of diversity, equity, and
inclusion
Response does not
adequately explain
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
Response adequately
explains individual
understanding of the
foundational concepts of
diversity, equity, and
inclusion.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
individual understanding
of the foundational
concepts of diversity,
equity, and inclusion.
• Explain how you define the
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of
cultural differences.
Learning Objective 1.2: Define
concepts of advantage and
disadvantage in the context of culture
Response does not
adequately explain
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response adequately
explains definitions of
the concepts of
advantage and
disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
definitions of the
concepts of advantage
and disadvantage in the
context of cultural
differences.
• Describe a situation when you
responded to differences in
others with a sense of
Response does not
adequately explain
factors that contribute to
perceptions of
Response adequately
explains factors that
contribute to perceptions
of advantage or
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains
factors that contribute to
perceptions of advantage
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
advantage or disadvantage.
Explain the factors that
contributed to that perception.
Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
that influence perceptions of
advantage or disadvantage in
situations with others
advantage or
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to
differences in others.
or disadvantage in a
situation that involved
responding to differences
in others.
Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare
Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
template document, address the
following:
• Summarize insights you gained
from your Project Implicit Test
results.
Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
insights from results of personal bias
tests
Response does not
adequately summarize
insights from Project
Implicit Test results.
Response adequately
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
Response accurately
and thoroughly
summarizes insights
from Project Implicit Test
results.
• Analyze how your personal
biases and values influence your
thinking and behavior. Be
specific with examples.
Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
influence of individual biases and
values on thinking and behavior
Response does not
adequately analyze with
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response adequately
analyzes with specific
examples how personal
biases and values
influence thinking and
behavior.
Response accurately
and thoroughly analyzes
with specific examples
how personal biases and
values influence thinking
and behavior.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe a situation when you
communicated with others in a
biased way or experienced
communication that was biased.
Apply your understanding of
personal bias to explain this
example.
Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
understanding of personal bias to
examples of biased communication
Response does not
adequately describe a
situation when
communication was
biased and/or
adequately apply
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response adequately
describes a situation
when communication
was biased and
adequately applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
Response accurately
and thoroughly describes
a situation when
communication was
biased and accurately
and thoroughly applies
understanding of
personal bias to explain
the example.
• Explain your thoughts and
feelings about the value of
examining your personal
biases—both as an individual
and as a professional in the
healthcare field.
Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
value of examining personal biases as
an individual and healthcare
professional
Response does not
adequately explain
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response adequately
explains thoughts and
feelings about the value
of examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
Response accurately
and thoroughly explains
thoughts and feelings
about the value of
examining personal
biases—both as an
individual and as a
professional in the
healthcare field.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 4
Rubric Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
• Describe at least two (2)
strategies for combatting implicit
bias that you would choose for
yourself. Explain your reasoning.
Note: Do not include
introspection as a strategy,
which you have applied and
summarized through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
strategies to combat implicit bias
Response does not
adequately explain the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and/or
includes introspection as
a strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response adequately
explains the individual
choice of at least two (2)
strategies to apply for
combatting implicit bias
and does not include
introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Response accurately and
thoroughly explains the
individual choice of at
least two (2) strategies to
apply for combatting
implicit bias and does not
include introspection as a
strategy, which was
applied and summarized
through the Implicit
Association Tests.
Professional Skills Assessment
Professional Writing
Professional Writing:
Clarity, Flow, and
Organization
Content contains significant
spelling, punctuation, and/or
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not
demonstrate adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and requires
additional
editing/proofreading. Key
sections of presented
content lack clarity, logical
flow, and/or organization.
Content contains few
spelling, punctuation,
and/or grammar/syntax
errors. Writing
demonstrates adequate
sentence and paragraph
structure and may require
some editing. Content
presented is satisfactorily
clear, logical, and/or
organized, but could
benefit from additional
editing/revision.
Content is free from
spelling, punctuation, and
grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates
appropriate sentence and
paragraph structure.
Content presented is clear,
logical, and well-organized.
Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 5
Context, Audience,
Purpose, and Tone
not demonstrate awareness
of context, audience, and/or
purpose. Writing is not
reflective of
professional/scholarly tone
and/or is not free of bias.
Style is inconsistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context
and reflects the need for
additional editing.
satisfactory awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is
adequately professional,
scholarly, and/or free from
bias, and style is mostly
consistent with the
professional
setting/workplace context.
demonstrates awareness of
context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is highly
professional, scholarly, and
free from bias, and style is
appropriate for the
professional
setting/workplace context.
Professional Writing:
Originality, Source
Credibility, and Attribution
of Ideas
Content does not
adequately reflect original
writing and/or paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates
inconsistent adherence to
reference requirements,
including the use of credible
evidence to support a claim,
with appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and reference. There are
numerous and/or significant
errors.
Content adequately reflects
original writing and
paraphrasing. Writing
demonstrates adequate
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when
applicable) and references.
There are one or two minor
errors.
Content reflects original
thought and writing and
proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full
adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with
appropriate source
attribution (when applicable)
and references.