Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] Preliminary Care Coordination Infographic

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center. Your facility has always had a dedicated case management staff that coordinated the patient plan of care, but recently, there were budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated to the inpatient setting. Care coordination i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center. Your facility has always had a dedicated case management staff that coordinated the patient plan of care, but recently, there were budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated to the inpatient setting. Care coordination is essential to the success of effectively managing patients in the community setting, so you have been asked by your nurse manager to take on the role of care coordination. You are a bit unsure of the process, but you know you will do a good job because, as a nurse, you are familiar with difficult tasks. As you take on this expanded role, you will need to plan effectively in addressing the specific health concerns of community residents.
    topic : Type 2 diabetes in pediatric patients in a community healthcare setting.

  • [Solved] wk 6 wk 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering wk 6 wk 7.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Create an hypotthetical log hours

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **DNP Project Hours Log** – DNPEssentials.pdf **DNPEssentials.pdf** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10421113) **DNPEssentials.pdf** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **DNP Project Hours Log**

    – DNPEssentials.pdf

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10421113)

    **DNPEssentials.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dnpessentials-pdf-10421113)

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## DocumentationforSterileFieldLabCollection1.docx **## DocumentationforSterileFieldLabCollection1.docx** ![A blue and yellow logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-20943661) **Documentation for Sterile Field & Lab Collection** **ADNG 1050 Foundation…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## DocumentationforSterileFieldLabCollection1.docx

    **## DocumentationforSterileFieldLabCollection1.docx**

    ![A blue and yellow logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-20943661)

    **Documentation for Sterile Field & Lab Collection**

    **ADNG 1050 Foundations of Nursing Skills**

    **Scenario:**
    MRSA Surveillance Swab Collection

    · Mr. James Reynolds is a 34-year-old admitted with pneumonia. He requires a nasal swab for MRSA screening per hospital admission protocol.

    · As part of the facility’s infection control protocol, newly admitted patients with respiratory illness must be screened for
    **nasal colonization of MRSA**. You are the student nurse assigned to collect the nasal swab using sterile technique. You must also set up a sterile field for supplies and maintain infection control procedures throughout.

    **🗂️ Documentation**

    📍
    **To complete:** Upload this document to your computer & fill it out electronically (directly into the assignment)

    📍
    **To turn it in:** Re-upload it to the correct file/drop box in D2L.

    \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________

    ✍️
    **1.** Write a
    **DARP** note including:

    **D: Data**

    **A: Action**

    **R: Response/Results**

    **P: Plan**

    🧑‍🏫
    **2. Patient Education (Write as a Script) Keep short and to the point.**

    **🔐 3. National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) Choose 1 priority NPSG that is relevant to this scenario and tell us why in 1 paragraph.**

    **NPSG Chosen:** **Why It Matters:**

    **📝 4. Nursing Diagnosis & Care Plan**

    **✅ 3-Part Nursing Diagnosis:**

    **🎯 5. SMART Goal:**

    **Student SMART goal:**

    **🩹 List:**

    ·
    2 Interventions to accomplish this goal

    · Rationale for each intervention

    · Evaluation for each intervention

    1. Intervention:

    · Rationale:

    · Evaluation:

    2. Intervention:

    · Rationale:

    · Evaluation:

    **🎥Video Review:**

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## DocumentationforSterileFieldLabCollection1.docx**

    ![A blue and yellow logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-20943661)

    **Documentation for Sterile Field & Lab Collection**

    **ADNG 1050 Foundations of Nursing Skills**

    **Scenario:**
    MRSA Surveillance Swab Collection

    · Mr. James Reynolds is a 34-year-old admitted with pneumonia. He requires a nasal swab for MRSA screening per hospital admission protocol.

    · As part of the facility’s infection control protocol, newly admitted patients with respiratory illness must be screened for
    **nasal colonization of MRSA**. You are the student nurse assigned to collect the nasal swab using sterile technique. You must also set up a sterile field for supplies and maintain infection control procedures throughout.

    **🗂️ Documentation**

    📍
    **To complete:** Upload this document to your computer & fill it out electronically (directly into the assignment)

    📍
    **To turn it in:** Re-upload it to the correct file/drop box in D2L.

    \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________

    ✍️
    **1.** Write a
    **DARP** note including:

    **D: Data**

    **A: Action**

    **R: Response/Results**

    **P: Plan**

    🧑‍🏫
    **2. Patient Education (Write as a Script) Keep short and to the point.**

    **🔐 3. National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) Choose 1 priority NPSG that is relevant to this scenario and tell us why in 1 paragraph.**

    **NPSG Chosen:** **Why It Matters:**

    **📝 4. Nursing Diagnosis & Care Plan**

    **✅ 3-Part Nursing Diagnosis:**

    **🎯 5. SMART Goal:**

    **Student SMART goal:**

    **🩹 List:**

    ·
    2 Interventions to accomplish this goal

    · Rationale for each intervention

    · Evaluation for each intervention

    1. Intervention:

    · Rationale:

    · Evaluation:

    2. Intervention:

    · Rationale:

    · Evaluation:

    **🎥Video Review:**

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Evp part 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project) **Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research** Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed article…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **The Assignment** (Evidence-Based Project)
    **Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research**
    Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
    **Note**: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
    **Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research**
    Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

  • [Solved] Question2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached for instructions – ## 2.docx **## 2.docx** This assessment will require you to develop a staff update for an interprofessional team to encourage team members to protect the privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient information. Health professionals today are increasingly account…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached for instructions

    – ## 2.docx

    **## 2.docx**

    This assessment will require you to develop a staff update for an interprofessional team to encourage team members to protect the privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient information.

    Health professionals today are increasingly accountable for the use of protected health information (PHI). Various government and regulatory agencies promote and support privacy and security through a variety of activities. Examples include:

    · Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR).

    · Provision of EHR incentive programs through Medicare and Medicaid.

    · Enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules.

    · Release of educational resources and tools to help providers and hospitals address privacy, security, and confidentiality risks in their practices.

    Technological advances, such as the use of social media platforms and applications for patient progress tracking and communication, have provided more access to health information and improved communication between care providers and patients.

    At the same time, advances such as these have resulted in more risk for protecting PHI. Nurses typically receive annual training on protecting patient information in their everyday practice. This training usually emphasizes privacy, security, and confidentiality best practices such as:

    · Keeping passwords secure.

    · Logging out of public computers.

    · Sharing patient information only with those directly providing care or who have been granted permission to receive this information.

    Today, one of the major risks associated with privacy and confidentiality of patient identity and data relates to social media. Many nurses and other health care providers place themselves at risk when they use social media or other electronic communication systems inappropriately. For example, a Texas nurse was recently terminated for posting patient vaccination information on Facebook. In another case, a New York nurse was terminated for posting an insensitive emergency department photo on her Instagram account.

    As you begin to consider the assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI) activity. The activity will support your success with the assessment by creating the opportunity for you to test your knowledge of potential privacy, security, and confidentiality violations of protected health information. The activity is not graded and counts towards course engagement.

    To successfully prepare to complete this assessment, complete the following:

    · Review the settings presented in the
    [Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290/download?download_frd=1) resource and select one to use as the focus for this assessment.
    **(SEE BELOW)**

    · Review the infographics on protecting PHI provided in the resources for this assessment, or find other infographics to review. These infographics serve as examples of how to succinctly summarize evidence-based information.

    · Analyze these infographics and distill them into five or six principles of what makes them effective. As you design your interprofessional staff update, apply these principles.
    **Note:** In a staff update, you will not have all the images and graphics that an infographic might contain. Instead, focus your analysis on what makes the messaging effective.

    · Select from any of the following options, or a combination of options, as the focus of your interprofessional staff update:

    · Social media best practices.

    · What not to do: social media.

    · Social media risks to patient information.

    · Steps to take if a breach occurs.

    Assessment 02 – Protected Health Information
    For this assessment, you will prepare a two-page interprofessional staff update on HIPAA and
    appropriate social media use in health care. Before you complete the detailed instructions in the
    courseroom, first select one of the settings below that will become the focus of your
    interprofessional staff update.
    After you have selected one of the two settings below, return to the courseroom to review the
    assessment instructions and grading rubric prior to completing your assessment.

    **• Outpatient Settings:**
    **o Context: Outpatient settings, also known as ambulatory care settings, are**
    **medical facilities where patients receive care without being admitted to the**
    **hospital. This includes clinics, physician's offices, and urgent care centers. Given the high patient turnover and the diverse range of conditions treated, it's crucial for staff to maintain patient privacy. With the rise of telemedicine consultations, there's an increased risk of HIPAA violations, especially if conversations are overheard or screens are visible to others.**
    **o Social Media Concern: Sharing any patient information, photos, or even**
    **seemingly harmless anecdotes from a day's work can lead to unintentional**
    **HIPAA violations.**

    In this assessment, imagine you are a nurse in one of the health care settings described in the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290/download?download_frd=1)

    Before your shift begins, you scroll through Facebook and notice that a coworker has posted a photo of herself and a patient on Facebook and described how happy she is that her patient is making great progress. You have recently completed your annual continuing education requirements at work and realize this is a breach of your organization's social media policy. Your organization requires employees to immediately report such breaches to the privacy officer to ensure the post is removed immediately and that the nurse responsible receives appropriate corrective action.

    You follow appropriate organizational protocols and report the breach to the privacy officer. The privacy officer takes swift action to remove the post. Due to the severity of the breach, the organization terminates the nurse.

    Based on this incident's severity, your organization has established a task force with two main goals:

    · Educate staff on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.

    · Prevent confidentiality, security, and privacy breaches.

    The task force has been charged with creating a series of interprofessional staff updates on the following topics:

    · Social media best practices.

    · What not to do: Social media.

    · Social media risks to patient information.

    · Steps to take if a breach occurs.

    First, select one of the health care settings described in the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290/download?download_frd=1)

    As a nurse in this setting, you are asked to create the content for a staff update containing a
    **maximum** of two content pages that address one or more of these topics:

    · Social media best practices.

    · What not to do: social media.

    · Social media risks to patient information.

    · Steps to take if a breach occurs.

    **This assessment is not a traditional essay**.
    **It is a staff educational update about PHI.** Consider creating a flyer, pamphlet, or one PowerPoint slide (not an entire presentation). Remember it should not be more than two pages (excluding a title and a reference page).

    The task force has asked team members assigned to the topics to include the following content in their updates in addition to content on their selected topics:

    · What is protected health information (PHI)?

    · Be sure to include essential HIPAA information.

    · What are privacy, security, and confidentiality?

    · Define and provide examples of privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns related to the use of technology in health care.

    · Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

    · What evidence relating to social media usage and PHI do interprofessional team members need to be aware of? For example:

    · What are some examples of nurses being terminated for inappropriate social media use in the United States?

    · What types of sanctions have health care organizations imposed on interdisciplinary team members who have violated social media policies?

    · What have been the financial penalties assessed against health care organizations for inappropriate social media use?

    · What evidence-based strategies have health care organizations employed to prevent or reduce confidentiality, privacy, and security breaches, particularly related to social media usage?

    **Notes**

    · Your staff update is limited to two double-spaced content pages. Be selective about the content you choose to include in your update so you can meet the page length requirement. Include
    **need-to-know** information. Omit
    **nice-to-know** information.

    · Many times people do not read staff updates, do not read them carefully, or do not read them to the end. Ensure your staff update piques staff members' interest, highlights key points, and is easy to read. Avoid overcrowding the update with too much content.

    · Also, supply a separate reference page that includes two or three peer-reviewed and one or two non-peer-reviewed resources (for a total of 3–5 resources) to support the staff update content.

    ·
    **Written communication:** Ensure the staff update is free from errors that detract from the overall message.

    ·
    **Submission length:** Maximum of two double-spaced content pages.

    ·
    **Font and font size:** Use Times New Roman, 12-point.

    ·
    **Citations and references:** Provide a separate reference page that includes 2–3 current, peer-reviewed and 1–2 current, non-peer-reviewed in-text citations and references (total of 3–5 resources) that support the staff update's content. Current
    **means** no older than 5 years.

    ·
    **APA format:** Be sure your citations and references adhere to APA format. Consult the
    [Evidence and APA](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540) page for an APA refresher.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Describe nurses' and the interdisciplinary team's role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

    · Describe the security, privacy, and confidentially laws related to protecting sensitive electronic health information that govern the interdisciplinary team.

    · Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

    · Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.

    · Identify evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks to patients and health care staff related to sensitive electronic health information.

    · Develop a professional, effective staff update that educates interprofessional team members about protecting the security, privacy, and confidentiality of patient data, particularly as it pertains to social media usage.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

    · Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

    · Create a clear, concise, well-organized, and professional staff update that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    **## 2.docx**

    This assessment will require you to develop a staff update for an interprofessional team to encourage team members to protect the privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient information.

    Health professionals today are increasingly accountable for the use of protected health information (PHI). Various government and regulatory agencies promote and support privacy and security through a variety of activities. Examples include:

    · Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR).

    · Provision of EHR incentive programs through Medicare and Medicaid.

    · Enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules.

    · Release of educational resources and tools to help providers and hospitals address privacy, security, and confidentiality risks in their practices.

    Technological advances, such as the use of social media platforms and applications for patient progress tracking and communication, have provided more access to health information and improved communication between care providers and patients.

    At the same time, advances such as these have resulted in more risk for protecting PHI. Nurses typically receive annual training on protecting patient information in their everyday practice. This training usually emphasizes privacy, security, and confidentiality best practices such as:

    · Keeping passwords secure.

    · Logging out of public computers.

    · Sharing patient information only with those directly providing care or who have been granted permission to receive this information.

    Today, one of the major risks associated with privacy and confidentiality of patient identity and data relates to social media. Many nurses and other health care providers place themselves at risk when they use social media or other electronic communication systems inappropriately. For example, a Texas nurse was recently terminated for posting patient vaccination information on Facebook. In another case, a New York nurse was terminated for posting an insensitive emergency department photo on her Instagram account.

    As you begin to consider the assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI) activity. The activity will support your success with the assessment by creating the opportunity for you to test your knowledge of potential privacy, security, and confidentiality violations of protected health information. The activity is not graded and counts towards course engagement.

    To successfully prepare to complete this assessment, complete the following:

    · Review the settings presented in the
    [Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290/download?download_frd=1) resource and select one to use as the focus for this assessment.
    **(SEE BELOW)**

    · Review the infographics on protecting PHI provided in the resources for this assessment, or find other infographics to review. These infographics serve as examples of how to succinctly summarize evidence-based information.

    · Analyze these infographics and distill them into five or six principles of what makes them effective. As you design your interprofessional staff update, apply these principles.
    **Note:** In a staff update, you will not have all the images and graphics that an infographic might contain. Instead, focus your analysis on what makes the messaging effective.

    · Select from any of the following options, or a combination of options, as the focus of your interprofessional staff update:

    · Social media best practices.

    · What not to do: social media.

    · Social media risks to patient information.

    · Steps to take if a breach occurs.

    Assessment 02 – Protected Health Information
    For this assessment, you will prepare a two-page interprofessional staff update on HIPAA and
    appropriate social media use in health care. Before you complete the detailed instructions in the
    courseroom, first select one of the settings below that will become the focus of your
    interprofessional staff update.
    After you have selected one of the two settings below, return to the courseroom to review the
    assessment instructions and grading rubric prior to completing your assessment.

    **• Outpatient Settings:**
    **o Context: Outpatient settings, also known as ambulatory care settings, are**
    **medical facilities where patients receive care without being admitted to the**
    **hospital. This includes clinics, physician's offices, and urgent care centers. Given the high patient turnover and the diverse range of conditions treated, it's crucial for staff to maintain patient privacy. With the rise of telemedicine consultations, there's an increased risk of HIPAA violations, especially if conversations are overheard or screens are visible to others.**
    **o Social Media Concern: Sharing any patient information, photos, or even**
    **seemingly harmless anecdotes from a day's work can lead to unintentional**
    **HIPAA violations.**

    In this assessment, imagine you are a nurse in one of the health care settings described in the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290/download?download_frd=1)

    Before your shift begins, you scroll through Facebook and notice that a coworker has posted a photo of herself and a patient on Facebook and described how happy she is that her patient is making great progress. You have recently completed your annual continuing education requirements at work and realize this is a breach of your organization's social media policy. Your organization requires employees to immediately report such breaches to the privacy officer to ensure the post is removed immediately and that the nurse responsible receives appropriate corrective action.

    You follow appropriate organizational protocols and report the breach to the privacy officer. The privacy officer takes swift action to remove the post. Due to the severity of the breach, the organization terminates the nurse.

    Based on this incident's severity, your organization has established a task force with two main goals:

    · Educate staff on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.

    · Prevent confidentiality, security, and privacy breaches.

    The task force has been charged with creating a series of interprofessional staff updates on the following topics:

    · Social media best practices.

    · What not to do: Social media.

    · Social media risks to patient information.

    · Steps to take if a breach occurs.

    First, select one of the health care settings described in the following resource:

    ·
    [Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/47501/files/8770290/download?download_frd=1)

    As a nurse in this setting, you are asked to create the content for a staff update containing a
    **maximum** of two content pages that address one or more of these topics:

    · Social media best practices.

    · What not to do: social media.

    · Social media risks to patient information.

    · Steps to take if a breach occurs.

    **This assessment is not a traditional essay**.
    **It is a staff educational update about PHI.** Consider creating a flyer, pamphlet, or one PowerPoint slide (not an entire presentation). Remember it should not be more than two pages (excluding a title and a reference page).

    The task force has asked team members assigned to the topics to include the following content in their updates in addition to content on their selected topics:

    · What is protected health information (PHI)?

    · Be sure to include essential HIPAA information.

    · What are privacy, security, and confidentiality?

    · Define and provide examples of privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns related to the use of technology in health care.

    · Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

    · What evidence relating to social media usage and PHI do interprofessional team members need to be aware of? For example:

    · What are some examples of nurses being terminated for inappropriate social media use in the United States?

    · What types of sanctions have health care organizations imposed on interdisciplinary team members who have violated social media policies?

    · What have been the financial penalties assessed against health care organizations for inappropriate social media use?

    · What evidence-based strategies have health care organizations employed to prevent or reduce confidentiality, privacy, and security breaches, particularly related to social media usage?

    **Notes**

    · Your staff update is limited to two double-spaced content pages. Be selective about the content you choose to include in your update so you can meet the page length requirement. Include
    **need-to-know** information. Omit
    **nice-to-know** information.

    · Many times people do not read staff updates, do not read them carefully, or do not read them to the end. Ensure your staff update piques staff members' interest, highlights key points, and is easy to read. Avoid overcrowding the update with too much content.

    · Also, supply a separate reference page that includes two or three peer-reviewed and one or two non-peer-reviewed resources (for a total of 3–5 resources) to support the staff update content.

    ·
    **Written communication:** Ensure the staff update is free from errors that detract from the overall message.

    ·
    **Submission length:** Maximum of two double-spaced content pages.

    ·
    **Font and font size:** Use Times New Roman, 12-point.

    ·
    **Citations and references:** Provide a separate reference page that includes 2–3 current, peer-reviewed and 1–2 current, non-peer-reviewed in-text citations and references (total of 3–5 resources) that support the staff update's content. Current
    **means** no older than 5 years.

    ·
    **APA format:** Be sure your citations and references adhere to APA format. Consult the
    [Evidence and APA](https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=1540) page for an APA refresher.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Describe nurses' and the interdisciplinary team's role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

    · Describe the security, privacy, and confidentially laws related to protecting sensitive electronic health information that govern the interdisciplinary team.

    · Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.

    · Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.

    · Identify evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks to patients and health care staff related to sensitive electronic health information.

    · Develop a professional, effective staff update that educates interprofessional team members about protecting the security, privacy, and confidentiality of patient data, particularly as it pertains to social media usage.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

    · Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

    · Create a clear, concise, well-organized, and professional staff update that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

  • [Solved] Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ComparingHumanistic-ExistentialPsychotherapywithOtherApproaches.docx **## ComparingHumanistic-ExistentialPsychotherapywithOtherApproaches.docx** Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches ![A person holding her hands together AI-generated content may be incorrect.](htt…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ComparingHumanistic-ExistentialPsychotherapywithOtherApproaches.docx

    **## ComparingHumanistic-ExistentialPsychotherapywithOtherApproaches.docx**

    Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches

    ![A person holding her hands together AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/comparing-humanistic-existential-psychotherapy-with-other-approaches-20943551)

    Understanding the strengths of each type of therapy and which type of therapy is most appropriate for each patient is an essential skill of the psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner. In this Assignment, you will compare humanistic-existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach. You will identify the strengths and challenges of each approach and describe expected potential outcomes.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/186997/modules/items/7729899)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the humanistic-existential psychotherapy videos in this week’s Learning Resources.

    · Reflect on humanistic-existential psychotherapeutic approaches.

    · Then, select another psychotherapeutic approach to compare with humanistic-existential psychotherapy. The approach you choose may be one you previously explored in the course or one you are familiar with and especially interested in.

    The Assignment

    In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

    · Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected.

    · Explain at least three differences between these therapies. Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP.

    · Focusing on one video you viewed, explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the patient in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the patient.

    · Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

    **_Note:_** _The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates ). All papers submitted must use this formatting._

    By Day 7

    **Submit** your Assignment.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NRNP_6645_Week7_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NRNP_6645_Week7_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page paper comparing humanistic-existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach of your choice. Be sure to address the following: ·  Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes an accurate and concise description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes a description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes a vague and inaccurate description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach, or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·   Explain at least three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the approach you selected. ·   Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes an accurate and clear explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach. The response includes a thoughtful and throrough explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes an accurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach…. The response includes an explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes a somehwat vague or inaccurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach…. The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach, or is missing…. The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP, or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·   Explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. ·   Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the client. ·   Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. PDFs are attached. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client. The response is supported by at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes an accurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice…. The response includes a description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client…. The response is supported by three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide appropriate support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.<br> <br>**27 to >23.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice…. The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client…. The response is supported by two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. Resources selected may provide only weak support for the rationale provided. PDFs may not be attached.<br> <br>**23 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice, or is missing…. The response includes a vauge and incomplete description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client, or is missing…. The response is supported by vague or inaccurate evidence from the literature, or is missing. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## ComparingHumanistic-ExistentialPsychotherapywithOtherApproaches.docx**

    Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches

    ![A person holding her hands together AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/comparing-humanistic-existential-psychotherapy-with-other-approaches-20943551)

    Understanding the strengths of each type of therapy and which type of therapy is most appropriate for each patient is an essential skill of the psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner. In this Assignment, you will compare humanistic-existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach. You will identify the strengths and challenges of each approach and describe expected potential outcomes.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/186997/modules/items/7729899)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the humanistic-existential psychotherapy videos in this week’s Learning Resources.

    · Reflect on humanistic-existential psychotherapeutic approaches.

    · Then, select another psychotherapeutic approach to compare with humanistic-existential psychotherapy. The approach you choose may be one you previously explored in the course or one you are familiar with and especially interested in.

    The Assignment

    In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

    · Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected.

    · Explain at least three differences between these therapies. Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP.

    · Focusing on one video you viewed, explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the patient in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the patient.

    · Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

    **_Note:_** _The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates ). All papers submitted must use this formatting._

    By Day 7

    **Submit** your Assignment.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **NRNP_6645_Week7_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NRNP_6645_Week7_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page paper comparing humanistic-existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach of your choice. Be sure to address the following: ·  Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes an accurate and concise description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes a description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes a vague and inaccurate description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach, or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·   Explain at least three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the approach you selected. ·   Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes an accurate and clear explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach. The response includes a thoughtful and throrough explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes an accurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach…. The response includes an explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes a somehwat vague or inaccurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach…. The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach, or is missing…. The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP, or is missing. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·   Explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. ·   Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the client. ·   Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. PDFs are attached. | **35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client. The response is supported by at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsGood 80%–89%** The response includes an accurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice…. The response includes a description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client…. The response is supported by three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide appropriate support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.<br> <br>**27 to >23.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice…. The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client…. The response is supported by two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. Resources selected may provide only weak support for the rationale provided. PDFs may not be attached.<br> <br>**23 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice, or is missing…. The response includes a vauge and incomplete description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client, or is missing…. The response is supported by vague or inaccurate evidence from the literature, or is missing. | 35 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%** Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%** Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] CL D7 R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CL D7 R.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] CF CL D7 R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CF CL D7 R.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] BJ week 6 part 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    BJ week 6 part 2 – ## GapAnalysisPresentation.docx – ## Presentation6031.pptx **## GapAnalysisPresentation.docx** Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation Beverly Jordan Herzing University NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice Dr. Kimberly Burks 10/06/2025 Sp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    BJ week 6 part 2

    – ## GapAnalysisPresentation.docx

    – ## Presentation6031.pptx

    **## GapAnalysisPresentation.docx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Speaker Notes

    Slide 2

    Medication reconciliation plays a vital role in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. The proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes by integrating real-time, interoperable medication data and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration.

    Slide 3

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. This technology allows clinicians to make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists share the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration complies with best practice recommendations from the WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, becoming efficient and regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    Slide 4

    Medication reconciliation is mainly manual and is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, handwritten records, and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real-time interoperability of hospital, outpatient, and pharmacy systems implies that data must be reconciled manually with providers, increasing workload and risk. Frequent duplication and omission of medication lists expose the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of care transitions overall.

    Slide 5

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of the medication reconciliation system in the EHR, enabling providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations, so it would not rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions, allergies, or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions, and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    Slide 6

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, often leading to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, which can result in nonadherence and adverse outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need for a simplified system to connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    Slide 7

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool that automatically integrates pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data. Staff training on the tool would be provided, and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise a clinical alert, actively detecting discrepancies and improving provider decision-making. Collaboration in preventing medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists, and physicians through shared responsibility.

    Slide 8

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. Daily reconciliation will be organized by nurses, pharmacists, and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists, connecting the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six-month pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable, and consistent with the hospital's mission to provide safe, high-quality care.

    Slide 9

    The last slide emphasizes the whole range of the gap analysis. The present condition is manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety, leading to a decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    Slide 10

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, March). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778%20)

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1%20)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295–3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    **## Presentation6031.pptx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Introduction

    Medication reconciliation is vital in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. By integrating real-time within the Department of Veteran Affairs, interoperable medication data, and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, the proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes.

    SMART Objective of Technology Integration

    Improve accuracy and efficiency of medication reconciliation during care transitions

    Reduce adverse drug events caused by incomplete or inaccurate medication lists

    Enhance interdisciplinary communication between providers, pharmacists, and nurses

    Support patient safety and continuity of care using integrated EHR tools

    Align practice with Joint Commission and WHO safety standards

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation

    solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. Clinicians can make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time through this technology. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists are sharing the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration is also compliant with best practice recommendations from WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, therefore becoming not only efficient but also regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    3

    Current Practice State

    Medication reconciliation often performed manually at admission and discharge

    Reliance on patient self-report and fragmented documentation systems

    High risk of omitted, duplicated, or inaccurate medications

    Limited interoperability between hospital, primary care, and pharmacy records

    Time-intensive process with inconsistent provider engagement

    Medication reconciliation is mostly manual in nature and therefore is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, hand written records and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real time interoperability of hospital, outpatient and pharmacy systems implies that data will have to be reconciled manually with providers further increasing workload and risk. There are frequent occurrences of duplication and omission of medication lists which exposes the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of transitions of care overall.

    4

    Desired Future State

    Fully EHR-integrated, real-time medication reconciliation across care settings

    Automated data pull from pharmacies, outpatient clinics, and previous encounters

    Clinical decision support alerts for drug–drug interactions and duplications

    Streamlined process reducing time burden for providers

    Improved patient outcomes through enhanced safety and reduced readmissions

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of medication reconciliation system in the EHR that enables the providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations so it would not have to rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions and allergies or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    5

    Overview of the Gap

    Current state relies on manual, error-prone processes

    Lacks seamless integration between hospital and outpatient systems

    Increased risk of adverse drug events and hospital readmissions

    Providers report frustration with inefficiency and information silos

    Patients face confusion with incomplete discharge instructions

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, and it often leads to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients usually must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, and this can result in nonadherence and negative outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need to have a simplified system, which will connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    6

    Proposed Remedy

    Implement EHR-integrated medication reconciliation tool with interoperability features

    Train staff on efficient workflow integration and patient education practices

    Use automated alerts to identify discrepancies and prevent errors

    Establish protocols for shared accountability across interdisciplinary teams

    Monitor impact through metrics such as reduced readmissions and error reports

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool which will be capable of integrating pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data automatically. Training of staff would be provided on how to use the tool and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise clinical alert which would actively detect discrepancies and improve provider decision making. Collaboration in prevention of medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists and physicians through shared responsibility.

    7

    Integration of Proposed Remedy

    Who: Nurses, pharmacists, physicians, IT support teams

    What: Integrate EHR-based medication reconciliation tool into workflow

    When: Pilot within 6 months, full implementation in 12 months

    Where: Inpatient hospital units transitioning patients to outpatient care

    Why: To improve patient safety, reduce preventable harm, and enhance quality.

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. The organization of daily reconciliation will be conducted by nurses, pharmacists and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists who will connect the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six months pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, and then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable and consistent with the mission of the hospital to provide safe high quality care.

    8

    Full Spectrum Gap Analysis

    Current State: Manual, fragmented medication reconciliation process

    Desired State: Automated, EHR-integrated, interoperable reconciliation system

    Gap: Inaccuracies, inefficiencies, increased risk of adverse events

    Remedy: Implement EHR tool, staff training, interdisciplinary accountability

    Outcome: Improved accuracy, safety, efficiency, and patient satisfaction

    The last slide throws emphasis on the whole range of the gap analysis. The reason is that the present condition is one of manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety leading to the decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    9

    Conclusion

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, Marzo). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778).

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295-3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    11

    ## image1.jpeg

    ## image2.jpeg

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image4.jpeg

    ## image5.jpeg

    ## image6.jpeg

    ## image7.jpeg

    ## image8.jpeg

    **## Presentation6031.pptx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Introduction

    Medication reconciliation is vital in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. By integrating real-time within the Department of Veteran Affairs, interoperable medication data, and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, the proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes.

    SMART Objective of Technology Integration

    Improve accuracy and efficiency of medication reconciliation during care transitions

    Reduce adverse drug events caused by incomplete or inaccurate medication lists

    Enhance interdisciplinary communication between providers, pharmacists, and nurses

    Support patient safety and continuity of care using integrated EHR tools

    Align practice with Joint Commission and WHO safety standards

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation

    solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. Clinicians can make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time through this technology. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists are sharing the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration is also compliant with best practice recommendations from WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, therefore becoming not only efficient but also regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    3

    Current Practice State

    Medication reconciliation often performed manually at admission and discharge

    Reliance on patient self-report and fragmented documentation systems

    High risk of omitted, duplicated, or inaccurate medications

    Limited interoperability between hospital, primary care, and pharmacy records

    Time-intensive process with inconsistent provider engagement

    Medication reconciliation is mostly manual in nature and therefore is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, hand written records and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real time interoperability of hospital, outpatient and pharmacy systems implies that data will have to be reconciled manually with providers further increasing workload and risk. There are frequent occurrences of duplication and omission of medication lists which exposes the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of transitions of care overall.

    4

    Desired Future State

    Fully EHR-integrated, real-time medication reconciliation across care settings

    Automated data pull from pharmacies, outpatient clinics, and previous encounters

    Clinical decision support alerts for drug–drug interactions and duplications

    Streamlined process reducing time burden for providers

    Improved patient outcomes through enhanced safety and reduced readmissions

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of medication reconciliation system in the EHR that enables the providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations so it would not have to rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions and allergies or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    5

    Overview of the Gap

    Current state relies on manual, error-prone processes

    Lacks seamless integration between hospital and outpatient systems

    Increased risk of adverse drug events and hospital readmissions

    Providers report frustration with inefficiency and information silos

    Patients face confusion with incomplete discharge instructions

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, and it often leads to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients usually must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, and this can result in nonadherence and negative outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need to have a simplified system, which will connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    6

    Proposed Remedy

    Implement EHR-integrated medication reconciliation tool with interoperability features

    Train staff on efficient workflow integration and patient education practices

    Use automated alerts to identify discrepancies and prevent errors

    Establish protocols for shared accountability across interdisciplinary teams

    Monitor impact through metrics such as reduced readmissions and error reports

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool which will be capable of integrating pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data automatically. Training of staff would be provided on how to use the tool and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise clinical alert which would actively detect discrepancies and improve provider decision making. Collaboration in prevention of medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists and physicians through shared responsibility.

    7

    Integration of Proposed Remedy

    Who: Nurses, pharmacists, physicians, IT support teams

    What: Integrate EHR-based medication reconciliation tool into workflow

    When: Pilot within 6 months, full implementation in 12 months

    Where: Inpatient hospital units transitioning patients to outpatient care

    Why: To improve patient safety, reduce preventable harm, and enhance quality.

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. The organization of daily reconciliation will be conducted by nurses, pharmacists and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists who will connect the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six months pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, and then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable and consistent with the mission of the hospital to provide safe high quality care.

    8

    Full Spectrum Gap Analysis

    Current State: Manual, fragmented medication reconciliation process

    Desired State: Automated, EHR-integrated, interoperable reconciliation system

    Gap: Inaccuracies, inefficiencies, increased risk of adverse events

    Remedy: Implement EHR tool, staff training, interdisciplinary accountability

    Outcome: Improved accuracy, safety, efficiency, and patient satisfaction

    The last slide throws emphasis on the whole range of the gap analysis. The reason is that the present condition is one of manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety leading to the decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    9

    Conclusion

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, Marzo). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778).

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295-3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    11

    ## image1.jpeg

    ## image2.jpeg

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image4.jpeg

    ## image5.jpeg

    ## image6.jpeg

    ## image7.jpeg

    ## image8.jpeg

    **## GapAnalysisPresentation.docx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Speaker Notes

    Slide 2

    Medication reconciliation plays a vital role in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. The proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes by integrating real-time, interoperable medication data and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration.

    Slide 3

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. This technology allows clinicians to make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists share the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration complies with best practice recommendations from the WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, becoming efficient and regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    Slide 4

    Medication reconciliation is mainly manual and is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, handwritten records, and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real-time interoperability of hospital, outpatient, and pharmacy systems implies that data must be reconciled manually with providers, increasing workload and risk. Frequent duplication and omission of medication lists expose the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of care transitions overall.

    Slide 5

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of the medication reconciliation system in the EHR, enabling providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations, so it would not rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions, allergies, or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions, and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    Slide 6

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, often leading to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, which can result in nonadherence and adverse outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need for a simplified system to connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    Slide 7

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool that automatically integrates pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data. Staff training on the tool would be provided, and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise a clinical alert, actively detecting discrepancies and improving provider decision-making. Collaboration in preventing medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists, and physicians through shared responsibility.

    Slide 8

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. Daily reconciliation will be organized by nurses, pharmacists, and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists, connecting the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six-month pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable, and consistent with the hospital's mission to provide safe, high-quality care.

    Slide 9

    The last slide emphasizes the whole range of the gap analysis. The present condition is manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety, leading to a decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    Slide 10

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, March). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778%20)

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1%20)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295–3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    **## Presentation6031.pptx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Introduction

    Medication reconciliation is vital in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. By integrating real-time within the Department of Veteran Affairs, interoperable medication data, and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, the proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes.

    SMART Objective of Technology Integration

    Improve accuracy and efficiency of medication reconciliation during care transitions

    Reduce adverse drug events caused by incomplete or inaccurate medication lists

    Enhance interdisciplinary communication between providers, pharmacists, and nurses

    Support patient safety and continuity of care using integrated EHR tools

    Align practice with Joint Commission and WHO safety standards

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation

    solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. Clinicians can make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time through this technology. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists are sharing the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration is also compliant with best practice recommendations from WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, therefore becoming not only efficient but also regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    3

    Current Practice State

    Medication reconciliation often performed manually at admission and discharge

    Reliance on patient self-report and fragmented documentation systems

    High risk of omitted, duplicated, or inaccurate medications

    Limited interoperability between hospital, primary care, and pharmacy records

    Time-intensive process with inconsistent provider engagement

    Medication reconciliation is mostly manual in nature and therefore is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, hand written records and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real time interoperability of hospital, outpatient and pharmacy systems implies that data will have to be reconciled manually with providers further increasing workload and risk. There are frequent occurrences of duplication and omission of medication lists which exposes the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of transitions of care overall.

    4

    Desired Future State

    Fully EHR-integrated, real-time medication reconciliation across care settings

    Automated data pull from pharmacies, outpatient clinics, and previous encounters

    Clinical decision support alerts for drug–drug interactions and duplications

    Streamlined process reducing time burden for providers

    Improved patient outcomes through enhanced safety and reduced readmissions

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of medication reconciliation system in the EHR that enables the providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations so it would not have to rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions and allergies or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    5

    Overview of the Gap

    Current state relies on manual, error-prone processes

    Lacks seamless integration between hospital and outpatient systems

    Increased risk of adverse drug events and hospital readmissions

    Providers report frustration with inefficiency and information silos

    Patients face confusion with incomplete discharge instructions

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, and it often leads to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients usually must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, and this can result in nonadherence and negative outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need to have a simplified system, which will connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    6

    Proposed Remedy

    Implement EHR-integrated medication reconciliation tool with interoperability features

    Train staff on efficient workflow integration and patient education practices

    Use automated alerts to identify discrepancies and prevent errors

    Establish protocols for shared accountability across interdisciplinary teams

    Monitor impact through metrics such as reduced readmissions and error reports

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool which will be capable of integrating pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data automatically. Training of staff would be provided on how to use the tool and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise clinical alert which would actively detect discrepancies and improve provider decision making. Collaboration in prevention of medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists and physicians through shared responsibility.

    7

    Integration of Proposed Remedy

    Who: Nurses, pharmacists, physicians, IT support teams

    What: Integrate EHR-based medication reconciliation tool into workflow

    When: Pilot within 6 months, full implementation in 12 months

    Where: Inpatient hospital units transitioning patients to outpatient care

    Why: To improve patient safety, reduce preventable harm, and enhance quality.

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. The organization of daily reconciliation will be conducted by nurses, pharmacists and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists who will connect the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six months pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, and then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable and consistent with the mission of the hospital to provide safe high quality care.

    8

    Full Spectrum Gap Analysis

    Current State: Manual, fragmented medication reconciliation process

    Desired State: Automated, EHR-integrated, interoperable reconciliation system

    Gap: Inaccuracies, inefficiencies, increased risk of adverse events

    Remedy: Implement EHR tool, staff training, interdisciplinary accountability

    Outcome: Improved accuracy, safety, efficiency, and patient satisfaction

    The last slide throws emphasis on the whole range of the gap analysis. The reason is that the present condition is one of manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety leading to the decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    9

    Conclusion

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, Marzo). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778).

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295-3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    11

    ## image1.jpeg

    ## image2.jpeg

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image4.jpeg

    ## image5.jpeg

    ## image6.jpeg

    ## image7.jpeg

    ## image8.jpeg

    **## GapAnalysisPresentation.docx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Speaker Notes

    Slide 2

    Medication reconciliation plays a vital role in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. The proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes by integrating real-time, interoperable medication data and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration.

    Slide 3

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. This technology allows clinicians to make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists share the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration complies with best practice recommendations from the WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, becoming efficient and regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    Slide 4

    Medication reconciliation is mainly manual and is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, handwritten records, and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real-time interoperability of hospital, outpatient, and pharmacy systems implies that data must be reconciled manually with providers, increasing workload and risk. Frequent duplication and omission of medication lists expose the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of care transitions overall.

    Slide 5

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of the medication reconciliation system in the EHR, enabling providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations, so it would not rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions, allergies, or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions, and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    Slide 6

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, often leading to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, which can result in nonadherence and adverse outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need for a simplified system to connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    Slide 7

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool that automatically integrates pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data. Staff training on the tool would be provided, and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise a clinical alert, actively detecting discrepancies and improving provider decision-making. Collaboration in preventing medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists, and physicians through shared responsibility.

    Slide 8

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. Daily reconciliation will be organized by nurses, pharmacists, and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists, connecting the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six-month pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable, and consistent with the hospital's mission to provide safe, high-quality care.

    Slide 9

    The last slide emphasizes the whole range of the gap analysis. The present condition is manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety, leading to a decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    Slide 10

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, March). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778%20)

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1%20)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295–3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    **## Presentation6031.pptx**

    Technology Integration- Part 1: Gap Analysis Presentation

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU725 Technology and Nursing Informatics in Advanced Practice

    Dr. Kimberly Burks

    10/06/2025

    Introduction

    Medication reconciliation is vital in promoting patient safety during care transitions. However, many healthcare organizations still rely on manual and inconsistent methods that increase the likelihood of medication errors, adverse drug events, and communication breakdowns among providers. This gap analysis identifies inefficiencies in the current manual medication reconciliation process and explores the benefits of implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based solution. By integrating real-time within the Department of Veteran Affairs, interoperable medication data, and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, the proposed system aims to improve accuracy, efficiency, and overall patient outcomes.

    SMART Objective of Technology Integration

    Improve accuracy and efficiency of medication reconciliation during care transitions

    Reduce adverse drug events caused by incomplete or inaccurate medication lists

    Enhance interdisciplinary communication between providers, pharmacists, and nurses

    Support patient safety and continuity of care using integrated EHR tools

    Align practice with Joint Commission and WHO safety standards

    The main goal of using an EHR-based medication reconciliation

    solution is to enhance patient safety across transitions in care by having accurate and complete medication lists. Adverse drug events remain a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitals today. Clinicians can make the process easier, minimize errors, and save time through this technology. Interdisciplinary communication is improved because physicians, nurses, and pharmacists are sharing the same up-to-date information. Moreover, the integration is also compliant with best practice recommendations from WHO patient safety goals and The Joint Commission, therefore becoming not only efficient but also regulatory compliant for health institutions.

    3

    Current Practice State

    Medication reconciliation often performed manually at admission and discharge

    Reliance on patient self-report and fragmented documentation systems

    High risk of omitted, duplicated, or inaccurate medications

    Limited interoperability between hospital, primary care, and pharmacy records

    Time-intensive process with inconsistent provider engagement

    Medication reconciliation is mostly manual in nature and therefore is subject to errors and inefficiencies. Hospitals rely on patient recollection, hand written records and disjointed documentation systems that frequently leave out significant information. A lack of real time interoperability of hospital, outpatient and pharmacy systems implies that data will have to be reconciled manually with providers further increasing workload and risk. There are frequent occurrences of duplication and omission of medication lists which exposes the patient to avoidable harm (Ciudad-Gutiérrez et al., 2025). Besides, it is very time-intensive, with variability in provider involvement, resulting in uneven outcomes in patient care and a lowered level of confidence in the safety of transitions of care overall.

    4

    Desired Future State

    Fully EHR-integrated, real-time medication reconciliation across care settings

    Automated data pull from pharmacies, outpatient clinics, and previous encounters

    Clinical decision support alerts for drug–drug interactions and duplications

    Streamlined process reducing time burden for providers

    Improved patient outcomes through enhanced safety and reduced readmissions

    The targeted future state consists of the complete integration and interoperability of medication reconciliation system in the EHR that enables the providers to obtain correct and real-time medication information across various sources. It would automatically retrieve information in pharmacies, outpatient visits, and previous hospitalizations so it would not have to rely on manual entries (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Inbuilt clinical decision support would provide notifications in case of drug-drug interactions and allergies or redundancy. These automation characteristics would save the staff time to work on more patients. Finally, this will result in a safer process, fewer errors, reduced hospital readmissions and patients will have confidence in the reliability and consistency of their drug control in any environment.

    5

    Overview of the Gap

    Current state relies on manual, error-prone processes

    Lacks seamless integration between hospital and outpatient systems

    Increased risk of adverse drug events and hospital readmissions

    Providers report frustration with inefficiency and information silos

    Patients face confusion with incomplete discharge instructions

    The difference is between the present time manual and error-prone system and the sought-after automated system and integration. Paperwork generates inefficiency and frustrates the providers, and risks adverse drug events. Transitions do not provide real-time access to complete and accurate medication information to healthcare teams, and it often leads to ineffective communication and unsafe patient discharge. In addition, patients usually must rely on confusing or ambiguous instructions, and this can result in nonadherence and negative outcomes (Rittenberge et al., 2022). Such a gap demonstrates the need to have a simplified system, which will connect data within care environments to provide medication accuracy, reduce errors, and promote patient-centered and safe care delivery.

    6

    Proposed Remedy

    Implement EHR-integrated medication reconciliation tool with interoperability features

    Train staff on efficient workflow integration and patient education practices

    Use automated alerts to identify discrepancies and prevent errors

    Establish protocols for shared accountability across interdisciplinary teams

    Monitor impact through metrics such as reduced readmissions and error reports

    The recommended solution is an EHR-based medication reconciliation tool which will be capable of integrating pharmacy, clinic, and hospital-based data automatically. Training of staff would be provided on how to use the tool and workflows would be standardized to facilitate consistency (Guo et al., 2021). The system would also comprise clinical alert which would actively detect discrepancies and improve provider decision making. Collaboration in prevention of medication errors will be achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, pharmacists and physicians through shared responsibility.

    7

    Integration of Proposed Remedy

    Who: Nurses, pharmacists, physicians, IT support teams

    What: Integrate EHR-based medication reconciliation tool into workflow

    When: Pilot within 6 months, full implementation in 12 months

    Where: Inpatient hospital units transitioning patients to outpatient care

    Why: To improve patient safety, reduce preventable harm, and enhance quality.

    This needs coordinated efforts by the key stakeholders to implement. The organization of daily reconciliation will be conducted by nurses, pharmacists and physicians with the assistance of IT specialists who will connect the EHR tool to the working processes. After a six months pilot program, the intervention will be fully implemented in a year. Piloting will first be done in inpatient units where care transitions are the most threatening, and then expanded throughout the organization (Rittenberge et al., 2022). The reason why it should be adopted is simple: to make patients safer, avoid unnecessary damage, and become more efficient. This systematic process will make the transition process efficient, sustainable and consistent with the mission of the hospital to provide safe high quality care.

    8

    Full Spectrum Gap Analysis

    Current State: Manual, fragmented medication reconciliation process

    Desired State: Automated, EHR-integrated, interoperable reconciliation system

    Gap: Inaccuracies, inefficiencies, increased risk of adverse events

    Remedy: Implement EHR tool, staff training, interdisciplinary accountability

    Outcome: Improved accuracy, safety, efficiency, and patient satisfaction

    The last slide throws emphasis on the whole range of the gap analysis. The reason is that the present condition is one of manual and fragmented reconciliation, whereas the desired condition is an automated and interoperable EHR system. The gap encompasses inefficiencies, lack of communication, and threats of adverse events (Guo et al., 2021). The suggested solution to bridge this divide includes EHR integration, staff training, and interdisciplinary responsibility. It is hoped that there would be a considerable enhancement in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety leading to the decrease in medication errors and readmissions. Offering the entire continuum of choices enables the stakeholders to see the problem and understand the real-life rewards of the suggested intervention.

    9

    Conclusion

    Bridging the gap between the current manual medication reconciliation process and a fully integrated EHR-based system is essential for ensuring safe, high-quality patient care. Implementing automated reconciliation supported by clinical decision tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will reduce errors, streamline workflows, and foster greater confidence in care transitions. Through structured training, pilot testing, and system-wide adoption, healthcare organizations can achieve improved medication accuracy, enhanced communication, and a culture of safety that aligns with best practice standards and patient-centered goals.

    References

    Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Acosta-García, H. L., Campano-Pérez, I. L., Ramírez-Duque, N., & Alfaro-Lara, E. R. (2025, Marzo). Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 7, p. 778). MDPI.
    [https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778](https://www.mdpi.com/j2227-9032/13/7/778).

    Guo, A., Beheshti, R., Khan, Y. M., Langabeer, J. R., & Foraker, R. E. (2021). Predicting cardiovascular health trajectories in time-series electronic health records with LSTM models. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 5.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-01345-1)

    Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022). Primary care physician gender and electronic health record workload. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(13), 3295-3301.
    [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z)

    11

    ## image1.jpeg

    ## image2.jpeg

    ## image3.jpeg

    ## image4.jpeg

    ## image5.jpeg

    ## image6.jpeg

    ## image7.jpeg

    ## image8.jpeg

    – 1
    – 2