Executive Solution Overview
– ## Module3Case.docx **## Module3Case.docx** **Module 3 – Case** **Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships** **Assignment Overview** **Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level** In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assess…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– ## Module3Case.docx
**## Module3Case.docx**
**Module 3 – Case**
**Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships**
**Assignment Overview**
**Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level**
In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at the “introduced” level. Finally, in HRM599 your skills will be assessed at the “emphasized” level.
**Case Assignment**
Background: Judith and Eric Sultan own a business providing HR decision-making expertise to employers across the nation. The name of their business is HRM Analysis Services. Their business is located in Phoenix and has grown exponentially since 2005. Up to this point they have not had their own employees, but instead hired established consultants (often called management analysts) to work on a project-by-project basis.
They want to hire three full-time management analysts to work in three different locations: San Francisco, Philadelphia, and Miami. The analysts would scout out work in their designated regions and manage the contracting and oversight of contractual consultants.
Judith and Eric plan to keep ownership of the company, but want to step away from the day-to-day as soon as the business is working well enough without them.
The focus of this assignment is to assist Judith and Eric with the selection of three Management Analysts by coming up with a weighted formula of important selection factors. The
[_Job Applicants Table_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/231271-HRM520-2025SEP22FT-1/Job%20Applicants%20Table-2.docx?ou=231271) shows the applicants who applied for the position. See
[_What Management Analysts Do_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/231271-HRM520-2025SEP22FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=231271) for a description of the position.
Your task is to:
1. Develop a formula to quantify the merits of each applicant based on the factors provided. Justify why you gave heavier weight to some factors over others.
2. Develop your own visual/graphic showing how each applicant fared.
3. Discuss your visual/graphic in essay format.
4. Recommend 6-8 applicants to proceed to a panel interview phase.
5. Critique the process of identifying best candidates to proceed in a selection process by using a custom-designed formula applied to each candidate.
Use
**at least 3 library sources** to help strengthen your discussion. Reference all material cited.
Your paper plus table(s) should be
**at least 4-5 pages** (not including cover sheet and reference page).
**Note:** There is no right or wrong formula to use. Use your best judgment for a formula based on the factors in the table given. Be sure to also spend time on the critical-thinking/analysis phase of this assignment.
For instruction on writing papers, citing sources, proper referencing, and so forth, use Trident University's
[_Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper_](https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879).
Upload your paper plus table by the module due date.
**## Module3Case.docx**
**Module 3 – Case**
**Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships**
**Assignment Overview**
**Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level**
In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at the “introduced” level. Finally, in HRM599 your skills will be assessed at the “emphasized” level.
**Case Assignment**
Background: Judith and Eric Sultan own a business providing HR decision-making expertise to employers across the nation. The name of their business is HRM Analysis Services. Their business is located in Phoenix and has grown exponentially since 2005. Up to this point they have not had their own employees, but instead hired established consultants (often called management analysts) to work on a project-by-project basis.
They want to hire three full-time management analysts to work in three different locations: San Francisco, Philadelphia, and Miami. The analysts would scout out work in their designated regions and manage the contracting and oversight of contractual consultants.
Judith and Eric plan to keep ownership of the company, but want to step away from the day-to-day as soon as the business is working well enough without them.
The focus of this assignment is to assist Judith and Eric with the selection of three Management Analysts by coming up with a weighted formula of important selection factors. The
[_Job Applicants Table_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/231271-HRM520-2025SEP22FT-1/Job%20Applicants%20Table-2.docx?ou=231271) shows the applicants who applied for the position. See
[_What Management Analysts Do_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/231271-HRM520-2025SEP22FT-1/What%20Management%20Analysts%20Do.docx?ou=231271) for a description of the position.
Your task is to:
1. Develop a formula to quantify the merits of each applicant based on the factors provided. Justify why you gave heavier weight to some factors over others.
2. Develop your own visual/graphic showing how each applicant fared.
3. Discuss your visual/graphic in essay format.
4. Recommend 6-8 applicants to proceed to a panel interview phase.
5. Critique the process of identifying best candidates to proceed in a selection process by using a custom-designed formula applied to each candidate.
Use
**at least 3 library sources** to help strengthen your discussion. Reference all material cited.
Your paper plus table(s) should be
**at least 4-5 pages** (not including cover sheet and reference page).
**Note:** There is no right or wrong formula to use. Use your best judgment for a formula based on the factors in the table given. Be sure to also spend time on the critical-thinking/analysis phase of this assignment.
For instruction on writing papers, citing sources, proper referencing, and so forth, use Trident University's
[_Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper_](https://careered.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=58451879).
Upload your paper plus table by the module due date.