My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] 421

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 421.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 3 case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Case Management Assignment** **Please respond to the 3 cases listed in Summers Chapter 16 Exercises I: Practice with Social Histories page 318. Be prepared to discuss these cases in class time permitting.** – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Case Management Assignment**

    **Please respond to the 3 cases listed in Summers Chapter 16 Exercises I: Practice with Social Histories page 318. Be prepared to discuss these cases in class time permitting.**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference – [\ \ Questions3-17.mht](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions3-17-mht "Questions3-17.mht") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference

    – [\
    \
    Questions3-17.mht](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions3-17-mht "Questions3-17.mht")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] quiita

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    one page each questions any use of AI will receive an automatic 0 q1 Discuss the pros and cons of the death penalty and place your response within the parameters of whether the death penalty is ethical. Q2 It has been said that prosecutors operate as if all suspects are guilty. What are the pros and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    one page each questions any use of AI will receive an automatic 0

    q1

    Discuss the pros and cons of the death penalty and place your response  within the parameters of whether the death penalty is ethical.

    Q2

    It has been said that prosecutors operate as if all suspects are guilty. What are the pros and cons to this approach?

    Q3

    How might the culture of a criminal justice organization impact reform? Might the culture protect misconduct?

    Q4

    What do you see as one of the most pressing issues in criminal justice  today that highlights the need for ethical behavior? What changes can we  implement to make your selected issue less of a concern?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] quiita

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## directions.docx **## directions.docx** 2 Find an important ethical subject where they develop and ethics policy. In essence, you have the opportunity to solve an ethical dilemma on a grand scale. Students should identify an ethical topic they ar…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## directions.docx

    **## directions.docx**

    2

    Find an important ethical subject where they develop and ethics policy. In  essence, you have the opportunity to solve an ethical dilemma on a grand  scale. Students should identify an ethical topic they are interested in  studying and create a policy and/or a recommendation to a state  governing agency about how this ethical issue should be handled moving  forward. Your choices should be fueled by empirical research and  scholarly sources on the subject. This ethical issue will impact more  than just your own individual self—it will affect the lives of all those  across the state or even the country.
    **Your job is to write a research summary for the state governor to use as the basis for his/her decision on this issue**

    General structure of your policy analysis  1. Conduct a brief review/synopsis of the relevant facts.  2. Identify what you believe to be the major ethical issues and the relevant underlying values of each opposing side.  3.  Set forth your recommendations for the continued use, modification, or  discontinuation of this policy. Your decision must have some sort of  rationale behind it. This is where you will present an answer to the  policy issue at hand. Before you can do this, you will have to decide on  what ethical system underlies your analysis. There is no right/wrong  system of ethics—choose the one with which you most closely identify. If  you are a utilitarian, your stance may be very different than if you  identify with ethical formalism or an ethic of care. But, as we know  from our class exercises, despite our different ethical systems, we may  encounter the same results.

    **Some topic suggestions: (these are not required; just ideas for you to consider)**

    1. A policy of racial profiling by police officers to reduce and prevent crime on the streets.  2. The use of plea-bargaining for defendants charged with felonies.  3.  The waiver of very young offenders (namely, "kids that kill") to adult  court and making them subject to adult processing and punishment.  4. The use of rehabilitation as the dominant model for corrections.  5. The use of restorative justice programs.  6. The use of "chain gangs," "tent city," and other novel punishments and how they impact prisoner rights.  7.  Any other current criminal justice policy issue, if approved by me (the  death penalty is not an option since we will be discussing this in  class)

    **Please adhere to these directives:**

    **Organization:** Title page, Abstract, Introduction, Body of the summary, Conclusion.

    The  papers should have a brief introduction, appropriate transitions  between topic areas, and a short conclusion. I am interested in each  student's ability to craft an organized approach to an ethical issue in  criminal justice. Synthesize the literature on the subject and  critically assess the ethical issue.

    **Substance**:  Each student should be able to craft a well-reasoned ethical argument.  Since we will be addressing "hot" topics of current debate, emotions  will run high. However, please try to support your argument with more  than just emotion. Where appropriate, essays should draw from course  readings, lectures, and discussions particular to the subject matter.

    **References**: Consult  at least five (5) outside peer reviewed sources to complete this  assignment (the course readings do not count). Please consider the  five-source requirement as establishing the baseline; students seeking  higher grades are advised to broaden their research.

    **## directions.docx**

    2

    Find an important ethical subject where they develop and ethics policy. In  essence, you have the opportunity to solve an ethical dilemma on a grand  scale. Students should identify an ethical topic they are interested in  studying and create a policy and/or a recommendation to a state  governing agency about how this ethical issue should be handled moving  forward. Your choices should be fueled by empirical research and  scholarly sources on the subject. This ethical issue will impact more  than just your own individual self—it will affect the lives of all those  across the state or even the country.
    **Your job is to write a research summary for the state governor to use as the basis for his/her decision on this issue**

    General structure of your policy analysis  1. Conduct a brief review/synopsis of the relevant facts.  2. Identify what you believe to be the major ethical issues and the relevant underlying values of each opposing side.  3.  Set forth your recommendations for the continued use, modification, or  discontinuation of this policy. Your decision must have some sort of  rationale behind it. This is where you will present an answer to the  policy issue at hand. Before you can do this, you will have to decide on  what ethical system underlies your analysis. There is no right/wrong  system of ethics—choose the one with which you most closely identify. If  you are a utilitarian, your stance may be very different than if you  identify with ethical formalism or an ethic of care. But, as we know  from our class exercises, despite our different ethical systems, we may  encounter the same results.

    **Some topic suggestions: (these are not required; just ideas for you to consider)**

    1. A policy of racial profiling by police officers to reduce and prevent crime on the streets.  2. The use of plea-bargaining for defendants charged with felonies.  3.  The waiver of very young offenders (namely, "kids that kill") to adult  court and making them subject to adult processing and punishment.  4. The use of rehabilitation as the dominant model for corrections.  5. The use of restorative justice programs.  6. The use of "chain gangs," "tent city," and other novel punishments and how they impact prisoner rights.  7.  Any other current criminal justice policy issue, if approved by me (the  death penalty is not an option since we will be discussing this in  class)

    **Please adhere to these directives:**

    **Organization:** Title page, Abstract, Introduction, Body of the summary, Conclusion.

    The  papers should have a brief introduction, appropriate transitions  between topic areas, and a short conclusion. I am interested in each  student's ability to craft an organized approach to an ethical issue in  criminal justice. Synthesize the literature on the subject and  critically assess the ethical issue.

    **Substance**:  Each student should be able to craft a well-reasoned ethical argument.  Since we will be addressing "hot" topics of current debate, emotions  will run high. However, please try to support your argument with more  than just emotion. Where appropriate, essays should draw from course  readings, lectures, and discussions particular to the subject matter.

    **References**: Consult  at least five (5) outside peer reviewed sources to complete this  assignment (the course readings do not count). Please consider the  five-source requirement as establishing the baseline; students seeking  higher grades are advised to broaden their research.

  • [Solved] Week 3 discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    APA format 7th edition Use evidence based practice Minimum of one paragraph per question Due in 20 hours – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    APA format 7th edition

    Use evidence based practice

    Minimum of one paragraph per question

    Due in 20 hours

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Leader vs. Manager

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Leader vs. Manager.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Disc 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Access the [County Health Rankings & Roadmaps websiteLinks to an external site.](https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/?&utm_source=google&utm_medium=paidsocial&utm_campaign=rankings2023) and search for health outcomes data for your state. Use the Rankings feature on the Data by County page to determ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Access the [County Health Rankings & Roadmaps websiteLinks to an external site.](https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/?&utm_source=google&utm_medium=paidsocial&utm_campaign=rankings2023) and search for health outcomes data for your state. Use the Rankings feature on the Data by County page to determine the county with the best and worst health outcomes rankings. Identify the ranking of your home county or the county where you practice.

    Next, use the Search by County feature to find your home county. Review the available data.

    Finally, use the Compare Counties feature to compare your home county to those identified with the best and worst health outcomes ranking in your state. Reflect on findings.

    **Include the following sections**:

    1. **Application of Course Knowledge**: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.

    – Provide an overview of the health outcomes and factors in your country. Which health factors are strengths in your county? Which are areas for improvement?
    – Consider the communities within your county. What influencing factors might be at the root of health factors needing improvement?
    – How does your home county or county of practice compare to the counties with the highest and lowest health outcomes rankings?
    – How will the information you found impact your role as an advanced practice nurse?
    2. **Integration of Evidence**: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by [program expectationsLinks to an external site.](https://mychamberlain.sharepoint.com/sites/StudentResourceCenter/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?id=%2Fsites%2FStudentResourceCenter%2FShared%20Documents%2FProgram%20Page%20Documents%2FNP%2FNP%20Program%20Expectations%20for%20Scholarly%20Resources%2012%2D2023%2Epdf&parent=%2Fsites%2FStudentResourceCenter%2FShared%20Documents%2FProgram%20Page%20Documents%2FNP):

    – Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
    – Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
    – Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
    – Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
    – Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
    3. **Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue**: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

    – Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer.
    – Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.
    – Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Week 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## week2.docx – ## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx **## week2.docx** **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## week2.docx

    – ## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx

    **## week2.docx**

    **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references must be listed in APA style._**

    Due 3/19/2025

    1. Briefly describe a criminal justice program in your community.

    2.
    Discuss the mission and goals of the program, including the specific population served

    3.
    List three possible outcomes this program may want to incorporate and assess.  Remember that outcomes should be measurable, relevant to the mission, and linked to the program's activities.

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## week2.docx**

    **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references must be listed in APA style._**

    Due 3/19/2025

    1. Briefly describe a criminal justice program in your community.

    2.
    Discuss the mission and goals of the program, including the specific population served

    3.
    List three possible outcomes this program may want to incorporate and assess.  Remember that outcomes should be measurable, relevant to the mission, and linked to the program's activities.

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## week2.docx**

    **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references must be listed in APA style._**

    Due 3/19/2025

    1. Briefly describe a criminal justice program in your community.

    2.
    Discuss the mission and goals of the program, including the specific population served

    3.
    List three possible outcomes this program may want to incorporate and assess.  Remember that outcomes should be measurable, relevant to the mission, and linked to the program's activities.

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

  • [Solved] network engineering

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In this assignment, you will design a secure network infrastructure. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is: Plan a deployment of software and/or hardware, including implementation and testing considerations. Search the web for network infrastructure diagram includin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In this assignment, you will design a secure network infrastructure.

    The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

    Plan a deployment of software and/or hardware, including implementation and testing considerations.

       Search the web for network infrastructure diagram including Web server, FTP server, VPN server, Authentication server, Anti-virus server (client-based and server-based), Edge firewall, Firewall, Vulnerability scanner, Intrusion detection system (IDS), Web proxy, Edge router, Core router, Switch, Distribution router.

    Then write a paper where you: Determine the specific devices you will use in the network, including the following information for each device:

    Make or vendor's name (for example, Microsoft, Redhat, Cisco, Juniper, Netgear, 3Com).

    Model (for example, Windows 7, ASA 5500, Cisco 3500, Squid).

    IP address assigned to all devices.

    Determine the basic configuration of each network device, citing specific, credible sources that support the configuration.

    Research each of the devices you chose and provide a basic configuration you would use in your network.

    Use IP addresses to describe your configuration.

    Identify the operating system.

    Highlight at least five security features and the administrative controls incorporated into each device, including devices in the network diagram.

    Explain the impact that each of your configurations has on the security of the entire network.

    Explain the elements that must be addressed for planning and testing a network, citing specific, credible sources that support your assertions and conclusions.

    Organizational requirements and expectations.

    Budget.

    Modularity for security and testing.

    Naming conventions that facilitate layering and growth.

    Determination of required network speed and data capacity.

    Vendor support.

    Determination of risk and redundancy.

    Uptime requirements.

    Continuous data monitoring for fault, failure, or security-induced changes.

    Load balancing.

    Testing for latency.

    Bandwidth.

    Throughput.

    Specific software and tools.

    Support your main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with at least four specific and credible academic sources synthesized into a coherent analysis of the evidence.

    – 2 years ago