Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] leadership characteristics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    does the executive branch of government have the power to order attacks on foreign soil? Persuasive

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    does the executive branch of government have the power to order attacks on foreign soil? Persuasive

  • [Solved] Journal Response MODULE 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    There are multiple opportunities for the DNP to become informed in health advocacy and policy. – ## Module3JournalQuestion.docx – ## Module3JournalQuestion-Rubric.docx **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx** There are multiple opportunities for the DNP to become informed in health advocacy and policy. Dr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    There are multiple opportunities for the DNP to become informed in health advocacy and policy.

    – ## Module3JournalQuestion.docx

    – ## Module3JournalQuestion-Rubric.docx

    **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx**

    There are multiple opportunities for the DNP to become informed in health advocacy and policy. Drawing upon your readings and life experience, discuss why you believe it is important for DNP graduates to be involved in advocacy and shaping health policy.

    What roles have you been in related to health policy?

    Describe any policies you have designed, influenced, or implemented.

    Do you see yourself assuming a leadership role in advocating for healthcare policy?

    Journal Response Expectations

    **Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.**

    **No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-Rubric.docx**

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-Rubric.docx**

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx**

    There are multiple opportunities for the DNP to become informed in health advocacy and policy. Drawing upon your readings and life experience, discuss why you believe it is important for DNP graduates to be involved in advocacy and shaping health policy.

    What roles have you been in related to health policy?

    Describe any policies you have designed, influenced, or implemented.

    Do you see yourself assuming a leadership role in advocating for healthcare policy?

    Journal Response Expectations

    **Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.**

    **No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-Rubric.docx**

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Module3JournalQuestion.docx**

    There are multiple opportunities for the DNP to become informed in health advocacy and policy. Drawing upon your readings and life experience, discuss why you believe it is important for DNP graduates to be involved in advocacy and shaping health policy.

    What roles have you been in related to health policy?

    Describe any policies you have designed, influenced, or implemented.

    Do you see yourself assuming a leadership role in advocating for healthcare policy?

    Journal Response Expectations

    **Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.**

    **No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

    **## Module3JournalQuestion-Rubric.docx**

    Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/journal-response-module-3)

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    14

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    16

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    20

    points minimum

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Visual Thinking Strategies – Velazquez

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that makes you think that? 3.) What more can we find? The image will be attached below. \ IMG_2165.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2165-jpeg-10419613 "IMG_…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around.
    1.) What is going on in this picture?
    2.) What do you see that makes you think that?
    3.) What more can we find?
    The image will be attached below.
    \
    IMG_2165.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2165-jpeg-10419613 "IMG_2165.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Nursing WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Nursing Ethics** – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx – ## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx** **Nursing Ethics Paper** Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Nursing Ethics**

    – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx

    – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx

    – ## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **“My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”.**

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **“My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”.**

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **“My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”.**

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Locate a mass media article published **within the last year** that describes findings of an epidemiological study. Be sure that the article is about an epidemiological study and not another area of population health. – Then, use the Walden Library to locate the peer-reviewed research article on w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Locate a mass media article published **within the last year** that describes findings of an epidemiological study. Be sure that the article is about an epidemiological study and not another area of population health.
    – Then, use the Walden Library to locate the peer-reviewed research article on which the mass media report is based.

  • [Solved] SBility

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SBility.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] a davis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment. Any use of AI will result in automatic 0 – ## adavis.docx **## adavis.docx** You need to write a 5-paragraph summary addressing one of the prompts below. You must have an introductory paragraph that concludes with a thesis for your summary. You need to have clear body paragrap…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment. Any use of AI will result in automatic 0

    – ## adavis.docx

    **## adavis.docx**

    You need to write a 5-paragraph summary addressing one of the prompts below. You must have an introductory paragraph that concludes with a thesis for your summary. You need to have clear body paragraph points that prove your thesis. Each body paragraph must consist of a topic sentence, evidence, and analysis of your evidence that proves your topic sentence. You also need a concluding paragraph. Your paragraphs need to be at least 5 sentences. This summary is to determine your writing skills. Do not use outside sources just your head. 1. Some people are actively involved in promoting and supporting a cause. Is there a cause you actively support? Write an summary convincing readers to support that cause. 2. All-girl schools have been gaining popularity in recent years because of the belief that girls learn better when they aren’t competing with or intimidated by boys, who statistically get more attention in the classroom. Do you think single-sex schools are a good idea? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 3. We all have favorite activities that we enjoy. Write an summary convincing readers to try the activity that you enjoy most. 4. Write an summary convincing readers to break a specific habit that is harmful to their physical, emotional, or financial health. 5. Have you ever traveled to a place that you found very meaningful and rewarding? Write an summary that persuades others to visit this important place

    **## adavis.docx**

    You need to write a 5-paragraph summary addressing one of the prompts below. You must have an introductory paragraph that concludes with a thesis for your summary. You need to have clear body paragraph points that prove your thesis. Each body paragraph must consist of a topic sentence, evidence, and analysis of your evidence that proves your topic sentence. You also need a concluding paragraph. Your paragraphs need to be at least 5 sentences. This summary is to determine your writing skills. Do not use outside sources just your head. 1. Some people are actively involved in promoting and supporting a cause. Is there a cause you actively support? Write an summary convincing readers to support that cause. 2. All-girl schools have been gaining popularity in recent years because of the belief that girls learn better when they aren’t competing with or intimidated by boys, who statistically get more attention in the classroom. Do you think single-sex schools are a good idea? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 3. We all have favorite activities that we enjoy. Write an summary convincing readers to try the activity that you enjoy most. 4. Write an summary convincing readers to break a specific habit that is harmful to their physical, emotional, or financial health. 5. Have you ever traveled to a place that you found very meaningful and rewarding? Write an summary that persuades others to visit this important place

  • [Solved] labreport25

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    read document – ## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf – ## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf – pag2.jpg – pag1.jpg – IMG_0412.png – IMG_0410.png **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf** Laboratory Report Guidelines TO DO Laboratory Report Guidelines These reports should…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    read document

    – ## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf

    – ## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf

    – pag2.jpg
    – pag1.jpg
    – IMG_0412.png
    – IMG_0410.png

    **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf**

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    These reports should follow general scientific guidelines. Herein we provide some fundamentals of
    writing reports. There is also a sample laboratory report with comments that you are strongly
    encouraged to check. Finally, the assessment rubrics, which your instructor or TA will use, should
    provide you with a clear idea of what is expected of you and your written reports. Make sure you review
    the lab report rubric before turning in your report. There are also a lot of other resources available to
    you at USF (e.g. Writing Studio) that can provide you with a clear idea of how to format and write
    laboratory reports. Also, check with your instructor or TA to see if they have any specific requirements
    for the written reports that you might want to consider.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports, much like scientific articles, contain the following sections: title page, introduction,
    methods (experimental section), results, discussion, conclusion, and references. In your reports, you
    will also be asked to include a Research Connection section. Most scientific articles also contain an
    abstract, but this will not be necessary for your reports.

    Title Page: This should be the first page of your report. Include the title of your report, your name, the
    course and section number, your instructor's name, and the date the paper is due. There are many
    online sources that could help you in creating informative titles for your report. Do not simply copy the
    name of the project from the laboratory manual.

    Introduction: In this section, you should introduce the reader to what you are trying to explain, and why
    it is important. Explicitly detail your project objectives and why the proposed experimental procedure
    will be effective in addressing those objectives. Include citations to valid and credible resources and
    references beyond the laboratory manual and your TA. Remember to clearly describe the source of the
    information and include it in the Reference section at the end of your report. The introduction section
    should be quite extensive and as comprehensive as possible in order to provide the reader with a good
    understanding of your project and the chemistry behind it.

    Methods (or Experimental Section): In this section you explain to the reader how you went about your
    work, and why you did it in that manner. This should be detailed; others should be able to replicate your
    work!

    Results: Use this section to include the data that helps you answer the project objectives. You will often
    need to present your results in tables, graphs and figures. However, keep in mind that you should not
    simply include tables and graphs without explaining the relevance of the data!

    Discussion: In this section you need to address how you interpret the results? Why are they relevant to
    include in your report? What are the particular strengths or weaknesses of your methods or analysis?
    These are all questions that readers are likely to want to know. By the time you have addressed these
    questions, you are ready to conclude your paper.

    Conclusions: In this section you need to provide a summary of the results and discussion. This is the
    outcome of your investigation and again should explicitly tie to what you said you were going to
    investigate in the introduction.

    The Results, Discussion and Conclusion sections are included as one in the laboratory report rubric.
    However, scientific articles have a separate subsection for each of them. Other reports may have a
    "Results and Discussion" section and a "Conclusion" section. Whereas other reports may have a
    "Results" section, and a "Discussion" section that also concludes the report. So, the decision of how to
    organize these sections will be up to you.

    References: Use this section to tell the reader where to find the sources of information you used in your
    report. In the body of the report, particularly in the Introduction and Discussion sections, you should
    have cited other sources. Refer to the Sample Laboratory Report for general examples!

    Also, you can check online for more detailed information on how to correctly cite a reference. The
    American Chemical Society (ACS) style should be followed in your lab report.

    Research Connection: This section is not a normal component of scientific reports. Sure, chemistry
    continually links their work to others through references, but they do not title a section Research
    Connection. For this section, if required, you are asked to consider your laboratory work, and how the
    work you have completed connects to current chemistry research. You may have to consult some
    outside resources for this.

    GUIDING IDEAS AND PLANNING QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with the material you are working with?
    2. What common criteria for assessing water quality will you use?
    3. Bring a water sample from the community. At the end of this project, you will compile your data with
    all other groups in your lab. Therefore, it will be important to note the date, time, and location of your
    sample collection. Water samples should be obtained from unfiltered sources.
    4. Is there a criterion you can use to base your judgments on water hardness?
    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your water samples will you test?
    6. How can the water hardness be reduced? What is the material used in the water softener systems
    that reduces the hardness of water?
    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixture type)?
    8. Is time a factor when using a filtration system? How long must the water be in contact with the
    filtration system?

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    1. What conclusions can you draw about the quality of the water you have tested? Are these
    conclusions in the range of accepted standards?
    2. What level of certainty do you have in your judgments? How will the number of trials you have tested
    play into your confidence?
    3. Another group analyzed the same sample as you; please find a way to share your findings and make
    a record of their findings. This will help you with your post-lab report.
    4. It would be a good idea to discuss your strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What analysis
    might be helpful? Are you using a criterion to judge the water hardness? Does your criterion provide
    you with any ideas about how you may want to analyze the compiled data?
    5. Is your water hardness data comparable with standard water samples from the city of Tampa?
    6. Compare your results with the data obtained from your peers in the lab, can you explain the
    similitudes or discrepancies?
    7. By how much did you soften your water sample?
    8. Compare the water hardness measurements obtained using the conductivity meter, pH meter, and
    water hardness strips. Are there any discrepancies? If so, why might they occur?
    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to investigate other aspects of water quality?

    THINGS YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER FOR YOUR REPORT

    1. What is your final assessment of the quality of drinking water for the water you analyzed?
    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?
    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates' claims who analyzed the same water? If not, it may
    be helpful to attempt to justify the differences.
    4. What judgments would you make about the water hardness of the community's water?
    5. Remember to use the compiled data from your lab section for your report. Were there any patterns in
    the data that suggest the hardness of water across the community varies?
    6. How much hardness did you reduce using the filtration system?
    7. Remember that we want you to connect your experimental work to research. What kind of similarities
    do you find between your lab work and what you understand from research (refer to the research
    connection in this document and other resources you find for this)? What kind of differences do you
    see?
    8. Do not forget to get information about the water quality of the city of Tampa (hardness) and compare
    it with your results.

    **## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf**

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    Your laboratory reports should follow standard scientific writing conventions. Below are the

    essential components and recommendations for creating clear, professional, and well-structured

    reports.

    You are strongly encouraged to review the sample laboratory report with comments

    provided, as well as the assessment rubric your instructor or TA will use to evaluate your work.

    Reviewing the rubric before submission will help ensure that your report meets all expectations.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports—similar to scientific journal articles—should include the following sections:

    Title Page, Introduction, Methods (Experimental Section), Results, Discussion, Conclusion,

    and References.

    In addition, you will include a Research Connection section. While most scientific papers

    include an abstract, it is not required for your lab reports.

    Title Page

    The title page should be the first page of your report and include:

    • The report title (create an informative and original title; do not simply copy from the lab

    manual)

    • Your name

    • Course and section number

    • Instructor’s name

    • Due date

    Introduction

    In this section, introduce the purpose and significance of your experiment. Clearly state your

    objectives and explain why the experimental procedure effectively addresses them.

    Include citations from credible sources beyond the lab manual or your TA, and properly

    reference all information in the References section. The introduction should be detailed enough

    to give the reader a solid understanding of your project and the chemistry concepts involved.

    Methods (Experimental Section)

    Describe how you conducted your experiment and why you chose those methods. This section

    should be detailed enough for another person to replicate your work based on your description.

    Results

    Present the data that supports your objectives. Use tables, graphs, and figures where

    appropriate, but remember to explain their significance—do not simply include visuals without

    context or discussion.

    Discussion

    Interpret your results here. Explain:

    • What your results mean

    • Why they are relevant

    • The strengths and weaknesses of your methods and analysis

    Address any unexpected findings and compare them to your initial objectives or hypotheses.

    Conclusions

    Summarize your key findings and interpretations. Connect your conclusions directly to your

    stated objectives in the introduction.

    Note: In the lab report rubric, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion are combined. However, in

    formal scientific writing, they are often presented as separate sections. You may choose your

    preferred structure.

    References

    List all sources used in your report. Be sure that every source cited in your Introduction and

    Discussion is included here. Follow the American Chemical Society (ACS) citation style.

    Refer to the sample report or online resources for citation examples.

    Research Connection

    This section is unique to your lab report. Reflect on how your experimental work relates to

    current research in chemistry. You may need to consult outside sources to explore these

    connections.

    Guiding Ideas and Planning Questions for the Project

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with your materials?

    2. Which criteria will you use to assess water quality?

    3. Bring a community water sample and record the date, time, and location of collection.

    Samples should come from unfiltered sources.

    4. What standard or criterion can you use to evaluate water hardness?

    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your samples will you test?

    6. How can water hardness be reduced? What materials in water softeners achieve this?

    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixed type)?

    8. Is time a factor when using filtration systems? How long should water remain in contact

    with the filter?

    Project Summary

    1. What conclusions can you draw about your water sample’s quality? Are your results

    within accepted standards?

    2. How confident are you in your results? How does the number of trials affect your

    confidence?

    3. Compare your findings with another group’s results from the same sample and record

    both sets of data.

    4. Develop a strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What criteria or methods will you

    use?

    5. Is your data comparable to Tampa’s standard water hardness levels?

    6. Compare your results with those of your peers. Can you explain any similarities or

    differences?

    7. By how much were you able to soften your water?

    8. Compare the hardness values obtained using conductivity meters, pH meters, and

    hardness strips. If discrepancies occur, explain possible reasons.

    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to study other aspects of water

    quality?

    Things to Consider for Your Report

    1. What is your final evaluation of the drinking water quality you analyzed?

    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?

    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates’ who tested the same sample? If not,

    justify the differences.

    4. What conclusions can you make about your community’s water hardness?

    5. Review the compiled class data—does it show variation in water hardness across the

    community?

    6. How much hardness was reduced using your filtration system?

    7. Connect your experimental findings to current scientific research. What similarities

    and differences exist?

    8. Compare your results with official data on Tampa’s water quality and discuss your

    findings.

    Follow the rubric below and these formatting guidelines to create your report:

    1. Each section, following the rubric, should have a header (Introduction, Results….
    etc.). You can add sub-headers as well if needed. The font for the headers and sub-
    headers cannot be larger than a size 14.

    2. Use Times New Roman or Calibri as font styles for the body of the report with a
    font size 12.

    3. Number your pages but exclude the title page.

    4. Your report has to be double spaced.

    5. The introduction must be written in present or future tense. The rest of the report
    must be in the past tense using passive voice. This means avoid using "you", "I", or
    "our" in your report.

    6. All the sections should be in paragraph form with the exception of the results
    section.

    7. All the data collected in the lab must be in the results section in tables as the ones
    shown below. Create the tables in WORD and do not copy/paste the tables below to
    avoid any issues. The tables must be numbered and contain a short descriptive
    title.

    8. Use Microsoft Equation Editor for ALL the calculations in your report.

    9. Your references (you can use more than 3 if needed) must follow the ACS format. A
    page can be found under the "Supporting Documents" Module titled " ACS Citation
    Sources" where you can find links to help you with the citations. Look at both and
    use the one that is easier for you to follow. There is also a link above in this page.

    **pag2.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag2-jpg)

    **pag1.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag1-jpg)

    **IMG_0412.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png-10420381)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf**

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    These reports should follow general scientific guidelines. Herein we provide some fundamentals of
    writing reports. There is also a sample laboratory report with comments that you are strongly
    encouraged to check. Finally, the assessment rubrics, which your instructor or TA will use, should
    provide you with a clear idea of what is expected of you and your written reports. Make sure you review
    the lab report rubric before turning in your report. There are also a lot of other resources available to
    you at USF (e.g. Writing Studio) that can provide you with a clear idea of how to format and write
    laboratory reports. Also, check with your instructor or TA to see if they have any specific requirements
    for the written reports that you might want to consider.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports, much like scientific articles, contain the following sections: title page, introduction,
    methods (experimental section), results, discussion, conclusion, and references. In your reports, you
    will also be asked to include a Research Connection section. Most scientific articles also contain an
    abstract, but this will not be necessary for your reports.

    Title Page: This should be the first page of your report. Include the title of your report, your name, the
    course and section number, your instructor's name, and the date the paper is due. There are many
    online sources that could help you in creating informative titles for your report. Do not simply copy the
    name of the project from the laboratory manual.

    Introduction: In this section, you should introduce the reader to what you are trying to explain, and why
    it is important. Explicitly detail your project objectives and why the proposed experimental procedure
    will be effective in addressing those objectives. Include citations to valid and credible resources and
    references beyond the laboratory manual and your TA. Remember to clearly describe the source of the
    information and include it in the Reference section at the end of your report. The introduction section
    should be quite extensive and as comprehensive as possible in order to provide the reader with a good
    understanding of your project and the chemistry behind it.

    Methods (or Experimental Section): In this section you explain to the reader how you went about your
    work, and why you did it in that manner. This should be detailed; others should be able to replicate your
    work!

    Results: Use this section to include the data that helps you answer the project objectives. You will often
    need to present your results in tables, graphs and figures. However, keep in mind that you should not
    simply include tables and graphs without explaining the relevance of the data!

    Discussion: In this section you need to address how you interpret the results? Why are they relevant to
    include in your report? What are the particular strengths or weaknesses of your methods or analysis?
    These are all questions that readers are likely to want to know. By the time you have addressed these
    questions, you are ready to conclude your paper.

    Conclusions: In this section you need to provide a summary of the results and discussion. This is the
    outcome of your investigation and again should explicitly tie to what you said you were going to
    investigate in the introduction.

    The Results, Discussion and Conclusion sections are included as one in the laboratory report rubric.
    However, scientific articles have a separate subsection for each of them. Other reports may have a
    "Results and Discussion" section and a "Conclusion" section. Whereas other reports may have a
    "Results" section, and a "Discussion" section that also concludes the report. So, the decision of how to
    organize these sections will be up to you.

    References: Use this section to tell the reader where to find the sources of information you used in your
    report. In the body of the report, particularly in the Introduction and Discussion sections, you should
    have cited other sources. Refer to the Sample Laboratory Report for general examples!

    Also, you can check online for more detailed information on how to correctly cite a reference. The
    American Chemical Society (ACS) style should be followed in your lab report.

    Research Connection: This section is not a normal component of scientific reports. Sure, chemistry
    continually links their work to others through references, but they do not title a section Research
    Connection. For this section, if required, you are asked to consider your laboratory work, and how the
    work you have completed connects to current chemistry research. You may have to consult some
    outside resources for this.

    GUIDING IDEAS AND PLANNING QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with the material you are working with?
    2. What common criteria for assessing water quality will you use?
    3. Bring a water sample from the community. At the end of this project, you will compile your data with
    all other groups in your lab. Therefore, it will be important to note the date, time, and location of your
    sample collection. Water samples should be obtained from unfiltered sources.
    4. Is there a criterion you can use to base your judgments on water hardness?
    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your water samples will you test?
    6. How can the water hardness be reduced? What is the material used in the water softener systems
    that reduces the hardness of water?
    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixture type)?
    8. Is time a factor when using a filtration system? How long must the water be in contact with the
    filtration system?

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    1. What conclusions can you draw about the quality of the water you have tested? Are these
    conclusions in the range of accepted standards?
    2. What level of certainty do you have in your judgments? How will the number of trials you have tested
    play into your confidence?
    3. Another group analyzed the same sample as you; please find a way to share your findings and make
    a record of their findings. This will help you with your post-lab report.
    4. It would be a good idea to discuss your strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What analysis
    might be helpful? Are you using a criterion to judge the water hardness? Does your criterion provide
    you with any ideas about how you may want to analyze the compiled data?
    5. Is your water hardness data comparable with standard water samples from the city of Tampa?
    6. Compare your results with the data obtained from your peers in the lab, can you explain the
    similitudes or discrepancies?
    7. By how much did you soften your water sample?
    8. Compare the water hardness measurements obtained using the conductivity meter, pH meter, and
    water hardness strips. Are there any discrepancies? If so, why might they occur?
    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to investigate other aspects of water quality?

    THINGS YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER FOR YOUR REPORT

    1. What is your final assessment of the quality of drinking water for the water you analyzed?
    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?
    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates' claims who analyzed the same water? If not, it may
    be helpful to attempt to justify the differences.
    4. What judgments would you make about the water hardness of the community's water?
    5. Remember to use the compiled data from your lab section for your report. Were there any patterns in
    the data that suggest the hardness of water across the community varies?
    6. How much hardness did you reduce using the filtration system?
    7. Remember that we want you to connect your experimental work to research. What kind of similarities
    do you find between your lab work and what you understand from research (refer to the research
    connection in this document and other resources you find for this)? What kind of differences do you
    see?
    8. Do not forget to get information about the water quality of the city of Tampa (hardness) and compare
    it with your results.

    **## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf**

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    Your laboratory reports should follow standard scientific writing conventions. Below are the

    essential components and recommendations for creating clear, professional, and well-structured

    reports.

    You are strongly encouraged to review the sample laboratory report with comments

    provided, as well as the assessment rubric your instructor or TA will use to evaluate your work.

    Reviewing the rubric before submission will help ensure that your report meets all expectations.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports—similar to scientific journal articles—should include the following sections:

    Title Page, Introduction, Methods (Experimental Section), Results, Discussion, Conclusion,

    and References.

    In addition, you will include a Research Connection section. While most scientific papers

    include an abstract, it is not required for your lab reports.

    Title Page

    The title page should be the first page of your report and include:

    • The report title (create an informative and original title; do not simply copy from the lab

    manual)

    • Your name

    • Course and section number

    • Instructor’s name

    • Due date

    Introduction

    In this section, introduce the purpose and significance of your experiment. Clearly state your

    objectives and explain why the experimental procedure effectively addresses them.

    Include citations from credible sources beyond the lab manual or your TA, and properly

    reference all information in the References section. The introduction should be detailed enough

    to give the reader a solid understanding of your project and the chemistry concepts involved.

    Methods (Experimental Section)

    Describe how you conducted your experiment and why you chose those methods. This section

    should be detailed enough for another person to replicate your work based on your description.

    Results

    Present the data that supports your objectives. Use tables, graphs, and figures where

    appropriate, but remember to explain their significance—do not simply include visuals without

    context or discussion.

    Discussion

    Interpret your results here. Explain:

    • What your results mean

    • Why they are relevant

    • The strengths and weaknesses of your methods and analysis

    Address any unexpected findings and compare them to your initial objectives or hypotheses.

    Conclusions

    Summarize your key findings and interpretations. Connect your conclusions directly to your

    stated objectives in the introduction.

    Note: In the lab report rubric, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion are combined. However, in

    formal scientific writing, they are often presented as separate sections. You may choose your

    preferred structure.

    References

    List all sources used in your report. Be sure that every source cited in your Introduction and

    Discussion is included here. Follow the American Chemical Society (ACS) citation style.

    Refer to the sample report or online resources for citation examples.

    Research Connection

    This section is unique to your lab report. Reflect on how your experimental work relates to

    current research in chemistry. You may need to consult outside sources to explore these

    connections.

    Guiding Ideas and Planning Questions for the Project

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with your materials?

    2. Which criteria will you use to assess water quality?

    3. Bring a community water sample and record the date, time, and location of collection.

    Samples should come from unfiltered sources.

    4. What standard or criterion can you use to evaluate water hardness?

    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your samples will you test?

    6. How can water hardness be reduced? What materials in water softeners achieve this?

    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixed type)?

    8. Is time a factor when using filtration systems? How long should water remain in contact

    with the filter?

    Project Summary

    1. What conclusions can you draw about your water sample’s quality? Are your results

    within accepted standards?

    2. How confident are you in your results? How does the number of trials affect your

    confidence?

    3. Compare your findings with another group’s results from the same sample and record

    both sets of data.

    4. Develop a strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What criteria or methods will you

    use?

    5. Is your data comparable to Tampa’s standard water hardness levels?

    6. Compare your results with those of your peers. Can you explain any similarities or

    differences?

    7. By how much were you able to soften your water?

    8. Compare the hardness values obtained using conductivity meters, pH meters, and

    hardness strips. If discrepancies occur, explain possible reasons.

    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to study other aspects of water

    quality?

    Things to Consider for Your Report

    1. What is your final evaluation of the drinking water quality you analyzed?

    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?

    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates’ who tested the same sample? If not,

    justify the differences.

    4. What conclusions can you make about your community’s water hardness?

    5. Review the compiled class data—does it show variation in water hardness across the

    community?

    6. How much hardness was reduced using your filtration system?

    7. Connect your experimental findings to current scientific research. What similarities

    and differences exist?

    8. Compare your results with official data on Tampa’s water quality and discuss your

    findings.

    Follow the rubric below and these formatting guidelines to create your report:

    1. Each section, following the rubric, should have a header (Introduction, Results….
    etc.). You can add sub-headers as well if needed. The font for the headers and sub-
    headers cannot be larger than a size 14.

    2. Use Times New Roman or Calibri as font styles for the body of the report with a
    font size 12.

    3. Number your pages but exclude the title page.

    4. Your report has to be double spaced.

    5. The introduction must be written in present or future tense. The rest of the report
    must be in the past tense using passive voice. This means avoid using "you", "I", or
    "our" in your report.

    6. All the sections should be in paragraph form with the exception of the results
    section.

    7. All the data collected in the lab must be in the results section in tables as the ones
    shown below. Create the tables in WORD and do not copy/paste the tables below to
    avoid any issues. The tables must be numbered and contain a short descriptive
    title.

    8. Use Microsoft Equation Editor for ALL the calculations in your report.

    9. Your references (you can use more than 3 if needed) must follow the ACS format. A
    page can be found under the "Supporting Documents" Module titled " ACS Citation
    Sources" where you can find links to help you with the citations. Look at both and
    use the one that is easier for you to follow. There is also a link above in this page.

    **pag2.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag2-jpg)

    **pag1.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag1-jpg)

    **IMG_0412.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png-10420381)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf**

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    These reports should follow general scientific guidelines. Herein we provide some fundamentals of
    writing reports. There is also a sample laboratory report with comments that you are strongly
    encouraged to check. Finally, the assessment rubrics, which your instructor or TA will use, should
    provide you with a clear idea of what is expected of you and your written reports. Make sure you review
    the lab report rubric before turning in your report. There are also a lot of other resources available to
    you at USF (e.g. Writing Studio) that can provide you with a clear idea of how to format and write
    laboratory reports. Also, check with your instructor or TA to see if they have any specific requirements
    for the written reports that you might want to consider.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports, much like scientific articles, contain the following sections: title page, introduction,
    methods (experimental section), results, discussion, conclusion, and references. In your reports, you
    will also be asked to include a Research Connection section. Most scientific articles also contain an
    abstract, but this will not be necessary for your reports.

    Title Page: This should be the first page of your report. Include the title of your report, your name, the
    course and section number, your instructor's name, and the date the paper is due. There are many
    online sources that could help you in creating informative titles for your report. Do not simply copy the
    name of the project from the laboratory manual.

    Introduction: In this section, you should introduce the reader to what you are trying to explain, and why
    it is important. Explicitly detail your project objectives and why the proposed experimental procedure
    will be effective in addressing those objectives. Include citations to valid and credible resources and
    references beyond the laboratory manual and your TA. Remember to clearly describe the source of the
    information and include it in the Reference section at the end of your report. The introduction section
    should be quite extensive and as comprehensive as possible in order to provide the reader with a good
    understanding of your project and the chemistry behind it.

    Methods (or Experimental Section): In this section you explain to the reader how you went about your
    work, and why you did it in that manner. This should be detailed; others should be able to replicate your
    work!

    Results: Use this section to include the data that helps you answer the project objectives. You will often
    need to present your results in tables, graphs and figures. However, keep in mind that you should not
    simply include tables and graphs without explaining the relevance of the data!

    Discussion: In this section you need to address how you interpret the results? Why are they relevant to
    include in your report? What are the particular strengths or weaknesses of your methods or analysis?
    These are all questions that readers are likely to want to know. By the time you have addressed these
    questions, you are ready to conclude your paper.

    Conclusions: In this section you need to provide a summary of the results and discussion. This is the
    outcome of your investigation and again should explicitly tie to what you said you were going to
    investigate in the introduction.

    The Results, Discussion and Conclusion sections are included as one in the laboratory report rubric.
    However, scientific articles have a separate subsection for each of them. Other reports may have a
    "Results and Discussion" section and a "Conclusion" section. Whereas other reports may have a
    "Results" section, and a "Discussion" section that also concludes the report. So, the decision of how to
    organize these sections will be up to you.

    References: Use this section to tell the reader where to find the sources of information you used in your
    report. In the body of the report, particularly in the Introduction and Discussion sections, you should
    have cited other sources. Refer to the Sample Laboratory Report for general examples!

    Also, you can check online for more detailed information on how to correctly cite a reference. The
    American Chemical Society (ACS) style should be followed in your lab report.

    Research Connection: This section is not a normal component of scientific reports. Sure, chemistry
    continually links their work to others through references, but they do not title a section Research
    Connection. For this section, if required, you are asked to consider your laboratory work, and how the
    work you have completed connects to current chemistry research. You may have to consult some
    outside resources for this.

    GUIDING IDEAS AND PLANNING QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with the material you are working with?
    2. What common criteria for assessing water quality will you use?
    3. Bring a water sample from the community. At the end of this project, you will compile your data with
    all other groups in your lab. Therefore, it will be important to note the date, time, and location of your
    sample collection. Water samples should be obtained from unfiltered sources.
    4. Is there a criterion you can use to base your judgments on water hardness?
    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your water samples will you test?
    6. How can the water hardness be reduced? What is the material used in the water softener systems
    that reduces the hardness of water?
    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixture type)?
    8. Is time a factor when using a filtration system? How long must the water be in contact with the
    filtration system?

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    1. What conclusions can you draw about the quality of the water you have tested? Are these
    conclusions in the range of accepted standards?
    2. What level of certainty do you have in your judgments? How will the number of trials you have tested
    play into your confidence?
    3. Another group analyzed the same sample as you; please find a way to share your findings and make
    a record of their findings. This will help you with your post-lab report.
    4. It would be a good idea to discuss your strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What analysis
    might be helpful? Are you using a criterion to judge the water hardness? Does your criterion provide
    you with any ideas about how you may want to analyze the compiled data?
    5. Is your water hardness data comparable with standard water samples from the city of Tampa?
    6. Compare your results with the data obtained from your peers in the lab, can you explain the
    similitudes or discrepancies?
    7. By how much did you soften your water sample?
    8. Compare the water hardness measurements obtained using the conductivity meter, pH meter, and
    water hardness strips. Are there any discrepancies? If so, why might they occur?
    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to investigate other aspects of water quality?

    THINGS YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER FOR YOUR REPORT

    1. What is your final assessment of the quality of drinking water for the water you analyzed?
    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?
    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates' claims who analyzed the same water? If not, it may
    be helpful to attempt to justify the differences.
    4. What judgments would you make about the water hardness of the community's water?
    5. Remember to use the compiled data from your lab section for your report. Were there any patterns in
    the data that suggest the hardness of water across the community varies?
    6. How much hardness did you reduce using the filtration system?
    7. Remember that we want you to connect your experimental work to research. What kind of similarities
    do you find between your lab work and what you understand from research (refer to the research
    connection in this document and other resources you find for this)? What kind of differences do you
    see?
    8. Do not forget to get information about the water quality of the city of Tampa (hardness) and compare
    it with your results.

    **## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf**

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    Your laboratory reports should follow standard scientific writing conventions. Below are the

    essential components and recommendations for creating clear, professional, and well-structured

    reports.

    You are strongly encouraged to review the sample laboratory report with comments

    provided, as well as the assessment rubric your instructor or TA will use to evaluate your work.

    Reviewing the rubric before submission will help ensure that your report meets all expectations.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports—similar to scientific journal articles—should include the following sections:

    Title Page, Introduction, Methods (Experimental Section), Results, Discussion, Conclusion,

    and References.

    In addition, you will include a Research Connection section. While most scientific papers

    include an abstract, it is not required for your lab reports.

    Title Page

    The title page should be the first page of your report and include:

    • The report title (create an informative and original title; do not simply copy from the lab

    manual)

    • Your name

    • Course and section number

    • Instructor’s name

    • Due date

    Introduction

    In this section, introduce the purpose and significance of your experiment. Clearly state your

    objectives and explain why the experimental procedure effectively addresses them.

    Include citations from credible sources beyond the lab manual or your TA, and properly

    reference all information in the References section. The introduction should be detailed enough

    to give the reader a solid understanding of your project and the chemistry concepts involved.

    Methods (Experimental Section)

    Describe how you conducted your experiment and why you chose those methods. This section

    should be detailed enough for another person to replicate your work based on your description.

    Results

    Present the data that supports your objectives. Use tables, graphs, and figures where

    appropriate, but remember to explain their significance—do not simply include visuals without

    context or discussion.

    Discussion

    Interpret your results here. Explain:

    • What your results mean

    • Why they are relevant

    • The strengths and weaknesses of your methods and analysis

    Address any unexpected findings and compare them to your initial objectives or hypotheses.

    Conclusions

    Summarize your key findings and interpretations. Connect your conclusions directly to your

    stated objectives in the introduction.

    Note: In the lab report rubric, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion are combined. However, in

    formal scientific writing, they are often presented as separate sections. You may choose your

    preferred structure.

    References

    List all sources used in your report. Be sure that every source cited in your Introduction and

    Discussion is included here. Follow the American Chemical Society (ACS) citation style.

    Refer to the sample report or online resources for citation examples.

    Research Connection

    This section is unique to your lab report. Reflect on how your experimental work relates to

    current research in chemistry. You may need to consult outside sources to explore these

    connections.

    Guiding Ideas and Planning Questions for the Project

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with your materials?

    2. Which criteria will you use to assess water quality?

    3. Bring a community water sample and record the date, time, and location of collection.

    Samples should come from unfiltered sources.

    4. What standard or criterion can you use to evaluate water hardness?

    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your samples will you test?

    6. How can water hardness be reduced? What materials in water softeners achieve this?

    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixed type)?

    8. Is time a factor when using filtration systems? How long should water remain in contact

    with the filter?

    Project Summary

    1. What conclusions can you draw about your water sample’s quality? Are your results

    within accepted standards?

    2. How confident are you in your results? How does the number of trials affect your

    confidence?

    3. Compare your findings with another group’s results from the same sample and record

    both sets of data.

    4. Develop a strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What criteria or methods will you

    use?

    5. Is your data comparable to Tampa’s standard water hardness levels?

    6. Compare your results with those of your peers. Can you explain any similarities or

    differences?

    7. By how much were you able to soften your water?

    8. Compare the hardness values obtained using conductivity meters, pH meters, and

    hardness strips. If discrepancies occur, explain possible reasons.

    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to study other aspects of water

    quality?

    Things to Consider for Your Report

    1. What is your final evaluation of the drinking water quality you analyzed?

    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?

    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates’ who tested the same sample? If not,

    justify the differences.

    4. What conclusions can you make about your community’s water hardness?

    5. Review the compiled class data—does it show variation in water hardness across the

    community?

    6. How much hardness was reduced using your filtration system?

    7. Connect your experimental findings to current scientific research. What similarities

    and differences exist?

    8. Compare your results with official data on Tampa’s water quality and discuss your

    findings.

    Follow the rubric below and these formatting guidelines to create your report:

    1. Each section, following the rubric, should have a header (Introduction, Results….
    etc.). You can add sub-headers as well if needed. The font for the headers and sub-
    headers cannot be larger than a size 14.

    2. Use Times New Roman or Calibri as font styles for the body of the report with a
    font size 12.

    3. Number your pages but exclude the title page.

    4. Your report has to be double spaced.

    5. The introduction must be written in present or future tense. The rest of the report
    must be in the past tense using passive voice. This means avoid using "you", "I", or
    "our" in your report.

    6. All the sections should be in paragraph form with the exception of the results
    section.

    7. All the data collected in the lab must be in the results section in tables as the ones
    shown below. Create the tables in WORD and do not copy/paste the tables below to
    avoid any issues. The tables must be numbered and contain a short descriptive
    title.

    8. Use Microsoft Equation Editor for ALL the calculations in your report.

    9. Your references (you can use more than 3 if needed) must follow the ACS format. A
    page can be found under the "Supporting Documents" Module titled " ACS Citation
    Sources" where you can find links to help you with the citations. Look at both and
    use the one that is easier for you to follow. There is also a link above in this page.

    **pag2.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag2-jpg)

    **pag1.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag1-jpg)

    **IMG_0412.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png-10420381)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6

  • [Solved] CPOLICY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CPOLICY.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] REDO Archi

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering REDO Archi.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.