My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Nursing WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Nursing Ethics** – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx – ## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx** **Nursing Ethics Paper** Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Nursing Ethics**

    – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx

    – ## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx

    – ## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **“My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”.**

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **“My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”.**

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **## Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx**

    **Nursing Ethics Paper**

    Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include:

    · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem?

    · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?

    · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects.

    **Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.**

    References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

    Scholarly articles
    **from**
    **2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

    **Resources**

    Finkelman, A. (2023).
    _Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership_ 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 6.**

    Chism, L. A. (2023).
    _The doctor of nursing_ _practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice_(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    **Read chapters 5 & 7.**

    **Additional Resources**

    American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021).
    _AANP Advocacy Center._ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter

    American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021).
    _Health policy._ https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/

    American Nurses Association. (2015).
    _Code ofethics for nurses._ https://www.

    nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only

    **“My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”.**

    **## Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

    Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    Content Weight:

    30

    %

    / 30

    0

    points

    Topic is inappropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    inaccurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts, unclear and

    difficult to under

    –

    stand; does not ad

    –

    dress many assign

    –

    ment requirements.

    Information has

    weak or no connec

    –

    tion to the assign

    –

    ment topic.

    21

    points

    Topic is mostly cov

    –

    ered and appropri

    –

    ate to assignment,

    but does not ade

    –

    quately demonstrate

    accurate under

    –

    standing of con

    –

    cepts; mostly clear

    and understandable;

    lacks some of the

    requirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion and/or provides

    little detail;

    Information relates

    to the main topic,

    but few details

    and/or examples are

    given.

    points

    24

    Topic is covered

    completely and ap

    –

    propriate to assign

    –

    ment; overview of

    key concept dimen

    –

    sions is evident;

    clear and under

    –

    standable; ad

    –

    dresses all of the re

    –

    quirements of the

    assignment descrip

    –

    tion, with adequate

    attention to detail.

    30

    points

    In-depth coverage

    of topic; outstand

    –

    ing clarity and ex

    –

    planation of con

    –

    cepts demonstrated

    in information pre

    –

    sented; approaches

    assignment with

    depth and breadth,

    without redundancy,

    using clear and fo

    –

    cused details.

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Organization<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.<br>Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. | 17.5 points<br>Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. | 20 points<br>Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.<br>Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. | 25 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.<br>Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. | / 25 |
    | Logic/Argument<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. | 10.5 points<br>Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. | 12 points<br>Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | 15 points<br>Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. | / 15 |

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Support Weight:<br>20% | 0 points<br>Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>APA format and style are not evident. | 14 points<br>Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. | 16 points<br>Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. | 20 points<br>Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.<br>Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. | / 20 |

    Total

    / 100

    Quality of

    Written

    Communication

    Weight: 10%

    / 10

    0

    points

    Style and voice inap

    –

    propriate or do not

    address given audi

    –

    ence, purpose, etc.

    Word choice is ex

    –

    cessively redundant,

    clichéd, and unspe

    –

    cific. Inconsistent

    grammar, spelling,

    punctuation, and

    paragraphing.

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough

    that they impede

    communication of

    meaning.

    points

    7

    Style and voice are

    somewhat appropri

    –

    ate to given audi

    –

    ence and purpose.

    Word choice is of

    –

    ten unspecific,

    generic, redundant,

    and clichéd.

    Repetitive mechani

    –

    cal errors distract

    the reader.

    Inconsistencies in

    language, sentence

    structure, and/or

    word choice are

    present.

    8

    points

    Style and voice are

    appropriate to the

    given audience and

    purpose. Word

    choice is specific

    and purposeful, and

    somewhat varied

    throughout. Minimal

    mechanical or typo

    –

    graphical errors are

    present, but are not

    overly distracting to

    the reader. Correct

    sentence structure

    and audience-appro

    –

    priate language are

    used.

    points

    10

    Style and voice are

    not only appropriate

    to the given audi

    –

    ence and purpose,

    but also show origi

    –

    nality and creativity.

    Word choice is spe

    –

    cific, purposeful, dy

    –

    namic and varied.

    Free of mechanical

    and typographical

    errors. A variety of

    sentence structures

    and effective figures

    of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in

    command of stan

    –

    dard, written, aca

    –

    demic English.

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship – Aspen University Classroom

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    10/6/25, 10:08 PM

    Criteria

    **Does Not Meet 0%**

    **Approaches 70%**

    **Meets 80%**

    **Exceeds 100%**

    **Criterion Score**

    1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    1/5

    **Overall Score**

    **Level 1**

    0

    points minimum

    **Level 2**

    70

    points minimum

    **Level 3**

    80

    points minimum

    **Level 4**

    100

    points minimum

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Visual Thinking Strategies – Georgione

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that makes you think that? 3.) What more can we find? The image will be attached below. \ IMG_2166.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2166-jpeg-10419615 "IMG_…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around.
    1.) What is going on in this picture?
    2.) What do you see that makes you think that?
    3.) What more can we find?
    The image will be attached below.
    \
    IMG_2166.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2166-jpeg-10419615 "IMG_2166.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Follow the instruction below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## CapstoneCourseAssignmentDescription.docx **## CapstoneCourseAssignmentDescription.docx** HCA 6923 Graduate Seminar Graduate Medical Education **Capstone Project** **Background:** Assume you have been asked by the Board of Trustees of a medium-sized rural hospital to develop a presentation on th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## CapstoneCourseAssignmentDescription.docx

    **## CapstoneCourseAssignmentDescription.docx**

    HCA 6923 Graduate Seminar

    Graduate Medical Education

    **Capstone Project**

    **Background:**

    Assume you have been asked by the Board of Trustees of a medium-sized rural hospital to develop a presentation on the process of starting a residency program in primary care/family medicine.

    **Assignment**:**

    The assignment is to develop a detailed
    **PowerPoint presentation** and a
    **written executive summary** on the residency startup process as well as the institutional obligations of the hospital as the sponsoring institution. Your PowerPoint presentation and written executive summary should address the following points:

    1) The rationale and justification for starting a residency program.

    2) The obligations of the hospital as a sponsoring institution.

    3) The process by which the hospital might receive federal funding for the residency program.

    4) The financial commitments of the hospital, both in the startup phase and after the program has received federal funding.

    5) The measures and methods for evaluating the performance of the residency program.

    \*\* (The information you will need to complete the assignment may be found in the readings as well as your answers to the study questions.)

    **## CapstoneCourseAssignmentDescription.docx**

    HCA 6923 Graduate Seminar

    Graduate Medical Education

    **Capstone Project**

    **Background:**

    Assume you have been asked by the Board of Trustees of a medium-sized rural hospital to develop a presentation on the process of starting a residency program in primary care/family medicine.

    **Assignment**:**

    The assignment is to develop a detailed
    **PowerPoint presentation** and a
    **written executive summary** on the residency startup process as well as the institutional obligations of the hospital as the sponsoring institution. Your PowerPoint presentation and written executive summary should address the following points:

    1) The rationale and justification for starting a residency program.

    2) The obligations of the hospital as a sponsoring institution.

    3) The process by which the hospital might receive federal funding for the residency program.

    4) The financial commitments of the hospital, both in the startup phase and after the program has received federal funding.

    5) The measures and methods for evaluating the performance of the residency program.

    \*\* (The information you will need to complete the assignment may be found in the readings as well as your answers to the study questions.)

  • [Solved] Visual Thinking Strategies – Giotto

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that makes you think that? 3.) What more can we find that? \ IMG_2167.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2167-jpeg-10419623 "IMG_2167.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around.
    1.) What is going on in this picture?
    2.) What do you see that makes you think that?
    3.) What more can we find that?
    \
    IMG_2167.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2167-jpeg-10419623 "IMG_2167.jpeg")

  • [Solved] asesswk1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## ASSIGMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx – ## rubric.docx – USW1_NURS_6002_AcademicandProfessionalSuccessDevelopmentPlanTemplate.docx **## ASSIGMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx** **ASSIGMENT INSTRUCTIONS** When was the last time you read Meditation XVII of John Donne's _Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions_ ? Unless yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## ASSIGMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx

    – ## rubric.docx

    – USW1_NURS_6002_AcademicandProfessionalSuccessDevelopmentPlanTemplate.docx

    **## ASSIGMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    **ASSIGMENT INSTRUCTIONS**

    When was the last time you read Meditation XVII of John Donne's
    _Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions_ ?

    Unless you are a student of seventeenth-century poetry, you may not be all that familiar with this piece. However, you may be much more familiar with one of its well-known phrases: “No man is an island…”.

    As you begin your journey toward achieving your academic and professional goals, you have a great opportunity to network with academics and professionals who can help ensure you do not travel alone. This network can help to clarify your own vision for success and can help guide you now and in the future. To paraphrase Donne, no one is an island.

    Begin creating an academic and professional network by identifying which academic and professional connections and resources with which you need to collaborate to succeed in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Consider individuals, departments, teams, and/or resources within Walden University and within your profession that you believe can support your academic and professional success.

    · Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals, colleagues, or teams that might help you succeed in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    · Download the
    _Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template_.

    **The Assignment:**

    **Academic and Professional Network**

    Complete Part 1 of your
    _Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template_. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify
    **at least two** academic and
    **at least two** professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    · Explain why you selected these individuals and/or teams and how they will support your success in the MSN and PMC program and as a practicing nurse.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **Week_1_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template. Be sure to: · Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN/post-master’s certificate (PMC) program and as a practicing nurse. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies the names, titles, and organizations of at least two academic individuals or teams and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly and accurately identifies the names, titles, and organizations of two academic individuals or teams and two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response includes fewer than two each (academic and professional) individuals, or is missing the full name, title, or organization of one or more individual.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes two or fewer academic and professional individuals, response does not include names, titles and organization or response is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why these individuals and/or teams were selected. Explain how these individuals and/or teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse. | **55 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Response clearly and thoroughly explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse….Response clearly and accurately explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**49 to >43.0 ptsGood** Response explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse. … Response explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**43 to >38.0 ptsFair** Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague. … Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate or is missing. … Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate or is missing. | 55 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **USW1_NURS_6002_AcademicandProfessionalSuccessDevelopmentPlanTemplate.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usw1-nurs-6002-academicandprofessionalsuccessdevelopmentplantemplate-docx-10419621)

    **USW1_NURS_6002_AcademicandProfessionalSuccessDevelopmentPlanTemplate.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usw1-nurs-6002-academicandprofessionalsuccessdevelopmentplantemplate-docx-10419621)

    **## ASSIGMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    **ASSIGMENT INSTRUCTIONS**

    When was the last time you read Meditation XVII of John Donne's
    _Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions_ ?

    Unless you are a student of seventeenth-century poetry, you may not be all that familiar with this piece. However, you may be much more familiar with one of its well-known phrases: “No man is an island…”.

    As you begin your journey toward achieving your academic and professional goals, you have a great opportunity to network with academics and professionals who can help ensure you do not travel alone. This network can help to clarify your own vision for success and can help guide you now and in the future. To paraphrase Donne, no one is an island.

    Begin creating an academic and professional network by identifying which academic and professional connections and resources with which you need to collaborate to succeed in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Consider individuals, departments, teams, and/or resources within Walden University and within your profession that you believe can support your academic and professional success.

    · Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals, colleagues, or teams that might help you succeed in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    · Download the
    _Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template_.

    **The Assignment:**

    **Academic and Professional Network**

    Complete Part 1 of your
    _Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template_. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify
    **at least two** academic and
    **at least two** professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    · Explain why you selected these individuals and/or teams and how they will support your success in the MSN and PMC program and as a practicing nurse.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **Week_1_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template. Be sure to: · Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN/post-master’s certificate (PMC) program and as a practicing nurse. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies the names, titles, and organizations of at least two academic individuals or teams and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly and accurately identifies the names, titles, and organizations of two academic individuals or teams and two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response includes fewer than two each (academic and professional) individuals, or is missing the full name, title, or organization of one or more individual.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes two or fewer academic and professional individuals, response does not include names, titles and organization or response is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why these individuals and/or teams were selected. Explain how these individuals and/or teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse. | **55 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Response clearly and thoroughly explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse….Response clearly and accurately explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**49 to >43.0 ptsGood** Response explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse. … Response explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**43 to >38.0 ptsFair** Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague. … Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate or is missing. … Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate or is missing. | 55 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **USW1_NURS_6002_AcademicandProfessionalSuccessDevelopmentPlanTemplate.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usw1-nurs-6002-academicandprofessionalsuccessdevelopmentplantemplate-docx-10419621)

    **## ASSIGMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx**

    **ASSIGMENT INSTRUCTIONS**

    When was the last time you read Meditation XVII of John Donne's
    _Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions_ ?

    Unless you are a student of seventeenth-century poetry, you may not be all that familiar with this piece. However, you may be much more familiar with one of its well-known phrases: “No man is an island…”.

    As you begin your journey toward achieving your academic and professional goals, you have a great opportunity to network with academics and professionals who can help ensure you do not travel alone. This network can help to clarify your own vision for success and can help guide you now and in the future. To paraphrase Donne, no one is an island.

    Begin creating an academic and professional network by identifying which academic and professional connections and resources with which you need to collaborate to succeed in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Consider individuals, departments, teams, and/or resources within Walden University and within your profession that you believe can support your academic and professional success.

    · Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals, colleagues, or teams that might help you succeed in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    · Download the
    _Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template_.

    **The Assignment:**

    **Academic and Professional Network**

    Complete Part 1 of your
    _Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template_. Be sure to address the following:

    · Identify
    **at least two** academic and
    **at least two** professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.

    · Explain why you selected these individuals and/or teams and how they will support your success in the MSN and PMC program and as a practicing nurse.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **Week_1_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template. Be sure to: · Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN/post-master’s certificate (PMC) program and as a practicing nurse. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response clearly and accurately identifies the names, titles, and organizations of at least two academic individuals or teams and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly and accurately identifies the names, titles, and organizations of two academic individuals or teams and two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response includes fewer than two each (academic and professional) individuals, or is missing the full name, title, or organization of one or more individual.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes two or fewer academic and professional individuals, response does not include names, titles and organization or response is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why these individuals and/or teams were selected. Explain how these individuals and/or teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse. | **55 to >49.0 ptsExcellent** Response clearly and thoroughly explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse….Response clearly and accurately explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**49 to >43.0 ptsGood** Response explains why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse. … Response explains how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse.<br> <br>**43 to >38.0 ptsFair** Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague. … Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague.<br> <br>**38 to >0 ptsPoor** Explanation of why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate or is missing. … Explanation of how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN/PMC program and as a practicing nurse is vague and inaccurate or is missing. | 55 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **USW1_NURS_6002_AcademicandProfessionalSuccessDevelopmentPlanTemplate.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usw1-nurs-6002-academicandprofessionalsuccessdevelopmentplantemplate-docx-10419621)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Geomatry

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    solve this question \ DesktopScreenshot2025.10.06-22.40.05.04.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/desktopscreenshot2025-10-06-22-40-05-04-png "DesktopScreenshot2025.10.06-22.40.05.04.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    solve this question
    \
    DesktopScreenshot2025.10.06-22.40.05.04.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/desktopscreenshot2025-10-06-22-40-05-04-png "DesktopScreenshot2025.10.06-22.40.05.04.png")

  • [Solved] How to Solve This Economics Case Study?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I'm working on an economics case study about market equilibrium and I'm a bit stuck. The assignment asks to “analyze how government intervention (such as price ceilings) affects consumer surplus and producer surplus in the short and long run.” I understand the basic concepts, but I’m not sure how to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I'm working on an economics case study about market equilibrium and I'm a bit stuck. The assignment asks to “analyze how government intervention (such as price ceilings) affects consumer surplus and producer surplus in the short and long run.”
    I understand the basic concepts, but I’m not sure how to structure my answer or what kind of real-world examples would make the analysis stronger. Should I use graphs or focus more on written explanation?
    Any advice, sample outlines, or references would be greatly appreciated!

  • [Solved] Need it done as soon as possible

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Need it done as soon as possible.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Locating Jobs in Your Selected HRT Field/Setting Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Locate the job description for a full-time management or executive position in your specialization with an HRT organization or company. You can also refer to the professional membership organization(s) you located for the Module 2 Discussion to locate jobs, many of those organizations have a job…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Locate the job description for a full-time management or executive position in your specialization with an HRT organization or company. You can also refer to the professional membership organization(s) you located for the Module 2 Discussion to locate jobs, many of those organizations have a job search function on their web page.
    2. Select a real HRT business, nonprofit or public agency and a real management position that fits with your career goals and philosophy. The idea is to locate a professional position in HRT that you could seek in the future.
    3. Do not select your current or former position or an organization or company you work for, have worked for, or have already written about for this class. Open up new horizons by looking into new positions/organizations.
    4. Locate information about the mission/vision/value/ethics/goal statements for the organization or company.
    5. Post information about what you found, be specific about the organization and job title, why the job and organization appeal to you.

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Management Job Analysis Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You have been asked to write a philosophy statement as part of the application process for a professional position in the Hospitality setting you are most interested in. Select a business or organization that you do not work for and have not worked for in the past (learn about jobs available in your…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You have been asked to write a philosophy statement as part of the application process for a professional position in the Hospitality setting you are most interested in.  Select a business or organization that you do not work for and have not worked for in the past (learn about jobs available in your field, the requirements for each job, what the agency is looking for in potential hires).
    The organization or company wants to learn more about you and what you stand for.  This is a personal statement, so use first person (I believe . . .  My philosophy is . . .).  Reflect on each of the following in your philosophy statement ( **PLEASE label and number sections**):
    1. What is important to you professionally?
    2. How will your values and beliefs impact your work and the direction of the organization or company?
    3. How do your principles guide your approach to work?
    4. What will you bring to the organization?
    5.  How does your philosophy connect with the mission/vision/value/goal statements of the organization or company?