Tag: Homework Solution

[Solved] Question

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## JournalAssignment.pdf **## JournalAssignment.pdf** Journal Assignment: If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal, laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more words laying out the best evidence to fi…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## JournalAssignment.pdf

**## JournalAssignment.pdf**

Journal Assignment:

If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal,
laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more
words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team Jury, you will do
300 words on each (600 total). Present your case as an extended argument, convincing
yourself (and your classmates) why whatever you believe is the objective truth.

Below is an optional set of instructions/prompts to help you build and organize your cases
for the journal and best practices, such as Prosecution offering discovery to the Defense.
Also attached is guides for Opening Statements and How to handle Objections. Email me if
you have any questions.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Prosecution:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What key pieces of evidence/witnesses from these pages are most crucial to
your case? List and explain why they are important to proving the defendant's
guilt.

o Are there any potential weaknesses/counterarguments related to the
evidence that you need to address preemptively?

o Identify any connections between pieces of evidence/witnesses that could
strengthen your argument or create a narrative thread for the jury.

o You must email a copy of this called “discovery” to the defense attorneys a
week before the trial.

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you introduce the case and engage the jury’s attention? Think about
how to establish the facts clearly and persuasively from the outset.

o What points do you intend to make to convince the jury of the defendant's
guilt? Outline them in a logical sequence.

o Ensure each point logically leads to the next. How can you make sure your
argument is cohesive and flows naturally as you walk the jury through the
evidence.

o For example, you should establish that a crime was committed before
arguing there was a conspiracy and only after that what part the accused
played in that conspiracy.

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o What rhetorical devices will you use to persuade the jury? Consider ethos,
pathos, and logos, and how each can strengthen your argument. Ethos
focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals to emotions, and logos
relies on logic and reason.

o Consider how you will respond to any potential rebuttals or defenses raised
by the opposing side.

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Defense:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What traces make good evidence in the case? What evidence/witnesses
might support your argument that the defendant is innocent, or what can you
use to cast doubt on the prosecution's case?

o Receive and read the prosecution’s discovery. Review the prosecution’s case
as detailed in their discovery. Are there any pieces of evidence you can
discredit or reinterpret? How will you challenge the reliability or credibility of
the evidence presented?

o What inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence can you highlight to weaken the
prosecution's argument?

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you open your defense to the jury? Think about how to introduce the
idea that reasonable doubt exists.

o What are the primary points you need to make to show the defendant's
innocence or cast doubt on their guilt? Structure these points logically.

o How will you ensure your argument flows clearly, with each point supporting
the next and culminating in a strong conclusion?

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o How will you use rhetoric to create empathy for the defendant and engage
the jury emotionally? What tone will you adopt to convey sincerity and
credibility?

o How can you use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the jury of your
argument’s merit? Ethos focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals
to emotions, and logos relies on logic and reason.

o What preemptive counterarguments can you anticipate from the
prosecution, and how will you respond to them?

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Yuzu Reader: Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict

[https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170](https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170)

**## JournalAssignment.pdf**

Journal Assignment:

If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal,
laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more
words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team Jury, you will do
300 words on each (600 total). Present your case as an extended argument, convincing
yourself (and your classmates) why whatever you believe is the objective truth.

Below is an optional set of instructions/prompts to help you build and organize your cases
for the journal and best practices, such as Prosecution offering discovery to the Defense.
Also attached is guides for Opening Statements and How to handle Objections. Email me if
you have any questions.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Prosecution:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What key pieces of evidence/witnesses from these pages are most crucial to
your case? List and explain why they are important to proving the defendant's
guilt.

o Are there any potential weaknesses/counterarguments related to the
evidence that you need to address preemptively?

o Identify any connections between pieces of evidence/witnesses that could
strengthen your argument or create a narrative thread for the jury.

o You must email a copy of this called “discovery” to the defense attorneys a
week before the trial.

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you introduce the case and engage the jury’s attention? Think about
how to establish the facts clearly and persuasively from the outset.

o What points do you intend to make to convince the jury of the defendant's
guilt? Outline them in a logical sequence.

o Ensure each point logically leads to the next. How can you make sure your
argument is cohesive and flows naturally as you walk the jury through the
evidence.

o For example, you should establish that a crime was committed before
arguing there was a conspiracy and only after that what part the accused
played in that conspiracy.

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o What rhetorical devices will you use to persuade the jury? Consider ethos,
pathos, and logos, and how each can strengthen your argument. Ethos
focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals to emotions, and logos
relies on logic and reason.

o Consider how you will respond to any potential rebuttals or defenses raised
by the opposing side.

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Defense:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What traces make good evidence in the case? What evidence/witnesses
might support your argument that the defendant is innocent, or what can you
use to cast doubt on the prosecution's case?

o Receive and read the prosecution’s discovery. Review the prosecution’s case
as detailed in their discovery. Are there any pieces of evidence you can
discredit or reinterpret? How will you challenge the reliability or credibility of
the evidence presented?

o What inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence can you highlight to weaken the
prosecution's argument?

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you open your defense to the jury? Think about how to introduce the
idea that reasonable doubt exists.

o What are the primary points you need to make to show the defendant's
innocence or cast doubt on their guilt? Structure these points logically.

o How will you ensure your argument flows clearly, with each point supporting
the next and culminating in a strong conclusion?

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o How will you use rhetoric to create empathy for the defendant and engage
the jury emotionally? What tone will you adopt to convey sincerity and
credibility?

o How can you use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the jury of your
argument’s merit? Ethos focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals
to emotions, and logos relies on logic and reason.

o What preemptive counterarguments can you anticipate from the
prosecution, and how will you respond to them?

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Yuzu Reader: Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict

[https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170](https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] 3 pages

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Discuss how to manage a recruitment and development programs as an entrepreneur of an imaginary newly formed business with at least two human resource management concepts and specific examples (including your or others experiences if available). What are the name and main products/services of the …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Discuss how to manage a recruitment and development programs as an entrepreneur of an imaginary newly formed business with at least two human resource management concepts and specific examples (including your or others experiences if available). What are the name and main products/services of the business? Support your discussion based on your expectations of at least one future HR (Human Resources) trend (In around 3 pages/ Double space available).**
\
Midterm_MGMT380_Fall2025.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/midterm-mgmt380-fall2025-docx-10430595 "Midterm_MGMT380_Fall2025.docx")

November 5, 2026
[Solved] BUSINESS (NO PLAGARISM A+ WORK, ON TIME)

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Discussion & Respond – ## Week8.docx – Marketingplan.docx **## Week8.docx** **Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)** **Research** Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in. **Discuss** · What were the challenges…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Discussion & Respond

– ## Week8.docx

– Marketingplan.docx

**## Week8.docx**

**Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)**

**Research**

Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in.

**Discuss**

· What were the challenges and triumphs you encountered while writing your marketing plan?

· What would the most significant challenges be to put this plan in place?

· What controls did you put into place to ensure the success of your marketing plan?

Respond to TG(No more than 150 words

Class,

                I hope everyone had a great eight weeks of learning. The marketing plan I developed focused on Maxwell House Coffee, a well-established brand facing notable challenges over the past decade. Through extensive research, I gained insights into the brand’s diverse product offerings and its storied heritage. However, this history became somewhat obscured when Kraft Heinz acquired the brand, followed by its subsequent purchase by an even larger conglomerate. Initially, my approach yielded positive results in evaluating product quality and leveraging traditional advertising methods.

This momentum was disrupted when Maxwell House Coffee underwent its first rebranding in 133 years, becoming Maxwell Apartment. Launching a new marketing campaign immediately after a major rebranding posed risks of consumer confusion. Recognizing this, I incorporated the rebranding into my proposal rather than disregarding it. After thorough analysis of available information regarding the campaign, I determined that the initiative appeared to be more of a promotional tactic and risked alienating loyal customers. Consequently, I recommend a detailed strategy rooted in traditional advertising, emphasizing Maxwell House’s historical significance and its unique connection to American culture, appealing to a broad audience that includes both agricultural workers and political figures.

Respond to Gm(No more than 150 words

Marketing plans are an integral part of the success of businesses and overall sales plans. Weak marketing can lead to loss of revenue, poor relationships with customer and vendors, and failure of an organization in some cases. For these reasons, investment in a good marketing team and solid marketing plan can yield an excellent return on investment for a business.

The biggest challenges I faced while writing my marketing plan were in relation to digging out information on competitors in the industry. Almost all are privately held organizations, so there is little information available to the public on their financial situations and other pertinent information. I had an advantage of being involved in this industry for the last 4 years, which did help in the marketing plan, giving me insight into the market that others may not have.

     My biggest triumph personally was putting together a marketing budget and figuring out the appropriation for those funds. This is something I’ve never done before, even as a GM running a business. Marketing activities are always handles by a corporate team, so putting together my own budget for one was really fun!

The biggest challenge for putting this plan into place would definitely be incorporating the recent safety study in a digestible way for consumers. One of the biggest hurdles in growing market share for rubber mulch is the pre-existing notion that it is inherently toxic, and if IMC can overcome those stereotypes, they have opportunity to really grow their business. It’s just a lot of information for customers to take in, and hard to make into visually appealing marketing materials.

Most of the controls I used in my plan are financially driven. We set measurable goals for market and revenue growth, and hitting those goals are the greatest control we can use. If we are falling short of the 7.5% increased sales revenue year over year, we can look for the indicators of where our marketing plan is falling short. Financial goals with clear parameters easily allow us to see where we are failing or where we are succeeding, and should be the first place we look when we are evaluating the success of this marketing plan.

**Marketingplan.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

**Marketingplan.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

**## Week8.docx**

**Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)**

**Research**

Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in.

**Discuss**

· What were the challenges and triumphs you encountered while writing your marketing plan?

· What would the most significant challenges be to put this plan in place?

· What controls did you put into place to ensure the success of your marketing plan?

Respond to TG(No more than 150 words

Class,

                I hope everyone had a great eight weeks of learning. The marketing plan I developed focused on Maxwell House Coffee, a well-established brand facing notable challenges over the past decade. Through extensive research, I gained insights into the brand’s diverse product offerings and its storied heritage. However, this history became somewhat obscured when Kraft Heinz acquired the brand, followed by its subsequent purchase by an even larger conglomerate. Initially, my approach yielded positive results in evaluating product quality and leveraging traditional advertising methods.

This momentum was disrupted when Maxwell House Coffee underwent its first rebranding in 133 years, becoming Maxwell Apartment. Launching a new marketing campaign immediately after a major rebranding posed risks of consumer confusion. Recognizing this, I incorporated the rebranding into my proposal rather than disregarding it. After thorough analysis of available information regarding the campaign, I determined that the initiative appeared to be more of a promotional tactic and risked alienating loyal customers. Consequently, I recommend a detailed strategy rooted in traditional advertising, emphasizing Maxwell House’s historical significance and its unique connection to American culture, appealing to a broad audience that includes both agricultural workers and political figures.

Respond to Gm(No more than 150 words

Marketing plans are an integral part of the success of businesses and overall sales plans. Weak marketing can lead to loss of revenue, poor relationships with customer and vendors, and failure of an organization in some cases. For these reasons, investment in a good marketing team and solid marketing plan can yield an excellent return on investment for a business.

The biggest challenges I faced while writing my marketing plan were in relation to digging out information on competitors in the industry. Almost all are privately held organizations, so there is little information available to the public on their financial situations and other pertinent information. I had an advantage of being involved in this industry for the last 4 years, which did help in the marketing plan, giving me insight into the market that others may not have.

     My biggest triumph personally was putting together a marketing budget and figuring out the appropriation for those funds. This is something I’ve never done before, even as a GM running a business. Marketing activities are always handles by a corporate team, so putting together my own budget for one was really fun!

The biggest challenge for putting this plan into place would definitely be incorporating the recent safety study in a digestible way for consumers. One of the biggest hurdles in growing market share for rubber mulch is the pre-existing notion that it is inherently toxic, and if IMC can overcome those stereotypes, they have opportunity to really grow their business. It’s just a lot of information for customers to take in, and hard to make into visually appealing marketing materials.

Most of the controls I used in my plan are financially driven. We set measurable goals for market and revenue growth, and hitting those goals are the greatest control we can use. If we are falling short of the 7.5% increased sales revenue year over year, we can look for the indicators of where our marketing plan is falling short. Financial goals with clear parameters easily allow us to see where we are failing or where we are succeeding, and should be the first place we look when we are evaluating the success of this marketing plan.

**Marketingplan.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

**## Week8.docx**

**Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)**

**Research**

Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in.

**Discuss**

· What were the challenges and triumphs you encountered while writing your marketing plan?

· What would the most significant challenges be to put this plan in place?

· What controls did you put into place to ensure the success of your marketing plan?

Respond to TG(No more than 150 words

Class,

                I hope everyone had a great eight weeks of learning. The marketing plan I developed focused on Maxwell House Coffee, a well-established brand facing notable challenges over the past decade. Through extensive research, I gained insights into the brand’s diverse product offerings and its storied heritage. However, this history became somewhat obscured when Kraft Heinz acquired the brand, followed by its subsequent purchase by an even larger conglomerate. Initially, my approach yielded positive results in evaluating product quality and leveraging traditional advertising methods.

This momentum was disrupted when Maxwell House Coffee underwent its first rebranding in 133 years, becoming Maxwell Apartment. Launching a new marketing campaign immediately after a major rebranding posed risks of consumer confusion. Recognizing this, I incorporated the rebranding into my proposal rather than disregarding it. After thorough analysis of available information regarding the campaign, I determined that the initiative appeared to be more of a promotional tactic and risked alienating loyal customers. Consequently, I recommend a detailed strategy rooted in traditional advertising, emphasizing Maxwell House’s historical significance and its unique connection to American culture, appealing to a broad audience that includes both agricultural workers and political figures.

Respond to Gm(No more than 150 words

Marketing plans are an integral part of the success of businesses and overall sales plans. Weak marketing can lead to loss of revenue, poor relationships with customer and vendors, and failure of an organization in some cases. For these reasons, investment in a good marketing team and solid marketing plan can yield an excellent return on investment for a business.

The biggest challenges I faced while writing my marketing plan were in relation to digging out information on competitors in the industry. Almost all are privately held organizations, so there is little information available to the public on their financial situations and other pertinent information. I had an advantage of being involved in this industry for the last 4 years, which did help in the marketing plan, giving me insight into the market that others may not have.

     My biggest triumph personally was putting together a marketing budget and figuring out the appropriation for those funds. This is something I’ve never done before, even as a GM running a business. Marketing activities are always handles by a corporate team, so putting together my own budget for one was really fun!

The biggest challenge for putting this plan into place would definitely be incorporating the recent safety study in a digestible way for consumers. One of the biggest hurdles in growing market share for rubber mulch is the pre-existing notion that it is inherently toxic, and if IMC can overcome those stereotypes, they have opportunity to really grow their business. It’s just a lot of information for customers to take in, and hard to make into visually appealing marketing materials.

Most of the controls I used in my plan are financially driven. We set measurable goals for market and revenue growth, and hitting those goals are the greatest control we can use. If we are falling short of the 7.5% increased sales revenue year over year, we can look for the indicators of where our marketing plan is falling short. Financial goals with clear parameters easily allow us to see where we are failing or where we are succeeding, and should be the first place we look when we are evaluating the success of this marketing plan.

**Marketingplan.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

– 1
– 2

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Education I need help with homework

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

I need help with homework – ## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx – ## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx **## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx** _Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion th…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

I need help with homework

– ## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx

– ## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx

**## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx**

_Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

You should make sure that you are utilizing the resources that are outlined within this course.

To engage students in instruction that integrates social studies and the arts, teachers need to use a variety of questioning strategies. Questioning engages students’ depth of knowledge and promotes problem-solving and higher-order thinking.

You have been asked to present a professional development on the use of questioning strategies. Examine questioning strategies that develop higher-order skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking appropriate for the chosen grade level in the Topic 1 assignment.

**Part 1: GoReact Presentation**

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation for the staff in which you outline the use of questioning strategies, assessments, and digital tools, and provide examples of probing questions related to the Topic 1 activity. Once the presentation is created, choose a screencast software to present the information. You will narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

Your presentation should include:

· A brief description of each depth of knowledge level (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) with an explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

· A variety of five probing questions for each level that can be used as pre-assessment, formative, and/or summative assessment questions during the activity developed in Topic 1. Remember, these questions should activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

· At least one strategy for implementing these questions in a formative assessment during the learning activity developed in Topic 1, and one summative assessment strategy that measures student learning after the activity. Include the questions that will be used for each and a brief justification of why they were chosen.

· At least two digital tools with a justification of how they support students in developing their own high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

You can access this assignment in two ways: through the calendar view or the Topic content. To begin working, click the 'Open Assignment' button.

Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

**Part 2: Reflection**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least
**_two specific comments_** by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

Support the presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides.

**_Note:_** _The digital presentation may be added as an artifact to the teacher toolkit you created in ELM-555._

Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.

Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Use an online video platform such as Loom or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others can access and view your linked video before submitting the assignment.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric in GoReact. Review the rubric in GoReact before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

**## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

0 / 9

**Description of DoK Level**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

Approaching

An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

Acceptable

An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

Target

A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

0 / 12

**Five Probing Questions**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Approaching

Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Acceptable

Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Target

Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

0 / 12

**Formative and Summative Assessment**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

Approaching

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

Acceptable

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

Target

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

0 / 9

**Digital Tools**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

Approaching

At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Acceptable

At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Target

Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Strength**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Target

An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Growth**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Target

A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

0 / 3

**Professionalism**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

Approaching

The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

Acceptable

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

Target

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

0 / 3

**Layout**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Approaching

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

Acceptable

The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

Target

The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

0 / 3

**Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Approaching

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

Acceptable

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Target

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

0 / 3

**Mechanics of Writing**

**Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

**Required**

**Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
**_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

**… Read More**

**https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

****Required****

****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

****… Read More****

****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

****Required****

****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

****Required****

****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

****Required****

****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

**## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

0 / 9

**Description of DoK Level**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

Approaching

An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

Acceptable

An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

Target

A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

0 / 12

**Five Probing Questions**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Approaching

Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Acceptable

Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Target

Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

0 / 12

**Formative and Summative Assessment**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

Approaching

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

Acceptable

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

Target

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

0 / 9

**Digital Tools**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

Approaching

At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Acceptable

At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Target

Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Strength**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Target

An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Growth**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Target

A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

0 / 3

**Professionalism**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

Approaching

The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

Acceptable

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

Target

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

0 / 3

**Layout**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Approaching

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

Acceptable

The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

Target

The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

0 / 3

**Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Approaching

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

Acceptable

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Target

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

0 / 3

**Mechanics of Writing**

**Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

**Required**

**Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
**_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

**… Read More**

**https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

****Required****

****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

****… Read More****

****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

****Required****

****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

****Required****

****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

****Required****

****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

**## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx**

_Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

You should make sure that you are utilizing the resources that are outlined within this course.

To engage students in instruction that integrates social studies and the arts, teachers need to use a variety of questioning strategies. Questioning engages students’ depth of knowledge and promotes problem-solving and higher-order thinking.

You have been asked to present a professional development on the use of questioning strategies. Examine questioning strategies that develop higher-order skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking appropriate for the chosen grade level in the Topic 1 assignment.

**Part 1: GoReact Presentation**

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation for the staff in which you outline the use of questioning strategies, assessments, and digital tools, and provide examples of probing questions related to the Topic 1 activity. Once the presentation is created, choose a screencast software to present the information. You will narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

Your presentation should include:

· A brief description of each depth of knowledge level (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) with an explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

· A variety of five probing questions for each level that can be used as pre-assessment, formative, and/or summative assessment questions during the activity developed in Topic 1. Remember, these questions should activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

· At least one strategy for implementing these questions in a formative assessment during the learning activity developed in Topic 1, and one summative assessment strategy that measures student learning after the activity. Include the questions that will be used for each and a brief justification of why they were chosen.

· At least two digital tools with a justification of how they support students in developing their own high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

You can access this assignment in two ways: through the calendar view or the Topic content. To begin working, click the 'Open Assignment' button.

Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

**Part 2: Reflection**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least
**_two specific comments_** by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

Support the presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides.

**_Note:_** _The digital presentation may be added as an artifact to the teacher toolkit you created in ELM-555._

Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.

Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Use an online video platform such as Loom or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others can access and view your linked video before submitting the assignment.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric in GoReact. Review the rubric in GoReact before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

**## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

0 / 9

**Description of DoK Level**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

Approaching

An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

Acceptable

An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

Target

A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

0 / 12

**Five Probing Questions**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Approaching

Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Acceptable

Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Target

Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

0 / 12

**Formative and Summative Assessment**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

Approaching

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

Acceptable

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

Target

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

0 / 9

**Digital Tools**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

Approaching

At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Acceptable

At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Target

Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Strength**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Target

An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Growth**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Target

A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

0 / 3

**Professionalism**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

Approaching

The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

Acceptable

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

Target

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

0 / 3

**Layout**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Approaching

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

Acceptable

The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

Target

The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

0 / 3

**Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Approaching

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

Acceptable

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Target

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

0 / 3

**Mechanics of Writing**

**Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

**Required**

**Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
**_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

**… Read More**

**https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

****Required****

****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

****… Read More****

****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

****Required****

****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

****Required****

****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

****Required****

****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

**## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx**

_Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

You should make sure that you are utilizing the resources that are outlined within this course.

To engage students in instruction that integrates social studies and the arts, teachers need to use a variety of questioning strategies. Questioning engages students’ depth of knowledge and promotes problem-solving and higher-order thinking.

You have been asked to present a professional development on the use of questioning strategies. Examine questioning strategies that develop higher-order skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking appropriate for the chosen grade level in the Topic 1 assignment.

**Part 1: GoReact Presentation**

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation for the staff in which you outline the use of questioning strategies, assessments, and digital tools, and provide examples of probing questions related to the Topic 1 activity. Once the presentation is created, choose a screencast software to present the information. You will narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

Your presentation should include:

· A brief description of each depth of knowledge level (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) with an explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

· A variety of five probing questions for each level that can be used as pre-assessment, formative, and/or summative assessment questions during the activity developed in Topic 1. Remember, these questions should activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

· At least one strategy for implementing these questions in a formative assessment during the learning activity developed in Topic 1, and one summative assessment strategy that measures student learning after the activity. Include the questions that will be used for each and a brief justification of why they were chosen.

· At least two digital tools with a justification of how they support students in developing their own high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

You can access this assignment in two ways: through the calendar view or the Topic content. To begin working, click the 'Open Assignment' button.

Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

**Part 2: Reflection**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least
**_two specific comments_** by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

Support the presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides.

**_Note:_** _The digital presentation may be added as an artifact to the teacher toolkit you created in ELM-555._

Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.

Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Use an online video platform such as Loom or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others can access and view your linked video before submitting the assignment.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric in GoReact. Review the rubric in GoReact before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

**## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

0 / 9

**Description of DoK Level**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

Approaching

An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

Acceptable

An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

Target

A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

0 / 12

**Five Probing Questions**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Approaching

Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Acceptable

Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

Target

Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

0 / 12

**Formative and Summative Assessment**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

Approaching

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

Acceptable

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

Target

The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

0 / 9

**Digital Tools**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

Approaching

At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Acceptable

At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

Target

Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Strength**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

Target

An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

0 / 3

**Reflection: Growth**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Approaching

A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Acceptable

A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

Target

A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

0 / 3

**Professionalism**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

Approaching

The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

Acceptable

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

Target

The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

0 / 3

**Layout**

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Approaching

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

Acceptable

The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

Target

The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

0 / 3

**Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

No Submission

Not addressed.

Insufficient

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Approaching

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

Acceptable

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Target

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

0 / 3

**Mechanics of Writing**

**Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

**Required**

**Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
**_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

**… Read More**

**https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

****Required****

****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

****… Read More****

****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

****Required****

****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

****Required****

****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

****Required****

****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

– 1
– 2

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Discussion

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Use the information presented in the white paper Healthcare Terminologies and Classifications: An Action Agenda for the United States. American Medical Informatics Association and American Health Information Management Association Terminology and Classification Policy Task Force, along with addition…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Use the information presented in the white paper Healthcare Terminologies and Classifications: An Action Agenda for the United States. American Medical Informatics Association and American Health Information Management Association Terminology and Classification Policy Task Force, along with additional research to develop a four to six slide PowerPoint presentation that details the continued steps necessary for health information governance. [Healthcare terminology and classification.pdf](https://brightspace.cuny.edu/content/enforced/957170-SPS01_HIM_202_1259_1_25466/csfiles/home_dir/courses/SPS_v23_HIM_202_15wk_Master_Dev/Healthcare%20terminology%20and%20classification.pdf)
The initial response must be relevant, detailed, and specific, at least 250 words.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Integration Seminar

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

see attachment – ## ISmodule1asig1.docx **## ISmodule1asig1.docx** _nterview and Communication Styles_ **Instructions:** 1. Use the virtual library to review different interview styles. 2. Compile a list of interview and communication styles and do additional research about them. 3. Research your…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

see attachment

– ## ISmodule1asig1.docx

**## ISmodule1asig1.docx**

_nterview and Communication Styles_

**Instructions:**

1. Use the virtual library to review different interview styles.

2. Compile a list of interview and communication styles and do additional research about them.

3. Research your chosen interview and communication styles and prepare a Venn Diagram comparing them.

4. Include an explanation of the two Venn Diagrams, the interview, and communication style diagrams.

5. Within the explanation, explore, define, and describe the interview process.

6. Identify the parties involved in the interview process.

7. What are the characteristics of an effective helper?

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 5 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.

If you are new to Canvas, follow
[these directionsLinks to an external site.](https://community.canvaslms.com/t5/Student-Guide/How-do-I-submit-an-online-assignment/ta-p/503) for submitting your assignments and review the
[academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission. Follow
[these instructionsLinks to an external site.](https://community.canvaslms.com/t5/Student-Guide/How-do-I-view-assignment-comments-from-my-instructor/ta-p/283) to review your grades and comments from your professor after it is graded.

**## ISmodule1asig1.docx**

_nterview and Communication Styles_

**Instructions:**

1. Use the virtual library to review different interview styles.

2. Compile a list of interview and communication styles and do additional research about them.

3. Research your chosen interview and communication styles and prepare a Venn Diagram comparing them.

4. Include an explanation of the two Venn Diagrams, the interview, and communication style diagrams.

5. Within the explanation, explore, define, and describe the interview process.

6. Identify the parties involved in the interview process.

7. What are the characteristics of an effective helper?

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 5 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.

If you are new to Canvas, follow
[these directionsLinks to an external site.](https://community.canvaslms.com/t5/Student-Guide/How-do-I-submit-an-online-assignment/ta-p/503) for submitting your assignments and review the
[academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission. Follow
[these instructionsLinks to an external site.](https://community.canvaslms.com/t5/Student-Guide/How-do-I-view-assignment-comments-from-my-instructor/ta-p/283) to review your grades and comments from your professor after it is graded.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] discussion

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering discussion.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Solution

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## Solution.pdf **## Solution.pdf** While the problems appear to be endless with funding and our schools, that doesn’t mean that they don’t deserve creative problem solving. While some solutions require more creativity than others, we must be constantly solutioning to ensure that students' educati…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## Solution.pdf

**## Solution.pdf**

While the problems appear to be endless with funding and our schools, that doesn’t
mean that they don’t deserve creative problem solving. While some solutions require
more creativity than others, we must be constantly solutioning to ensure that students'
educational needs are met.

Specific Assignment Details

For this deliverable you will present a solution to your identified funding issue. You may
present your solution in paper format or in a presentation delivery method. You should
convey the following about your solution:

● Summary of the Solution
● How the solution could be implemented this fiscal year
● Provide the impact of the solution to

○ Funding
○ Students
○ Employees

● Utilize research/resources to support the issue and impact.

Please be sure that your work is formatted in APA style

**## Solution.pdf**

While the problems appear to be endless with funding and our schools, that doesn’t
mean that they don’t deserve creative problem solving. While some solutions require
more creativity than others, we must be constantly solutioning to ensure that students'
educational needs are met.

Specific Assignment Details

For this deliverable you will present a solution to your identified funding issue. You may
present your solution in paper format or in a presentation delivery method. You should
convey the following about your solution:

● Summary of the Solution
● How the solution could be implemented this fiscal year
● Provide the impact of the solution to

○ Funding
○ Students
○ Employees

● Utilize research/resources to support the issue and impact.

Please be sure that your work is formatted in APA style

November 5, 2026
[Solved] “Show Me The Money” Establishing a Community-Based – Organizational Incubator to Strengthen Grassroots CVI Efforts

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

I would like clear and specific responses to support the following to support my project plan. Use the responses to the questions to fill in the template. I have attached some additional assignments to support the desired outcome. The following deliverables are listed below: 1. The responses to the…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

I would like clear and specific responses to support the following to support my project plan. Use the responses to the questions to fill in the template. I have attached some additional assignments to support the desired outcome.
The following deliverables are listed below:
1. The responses to the questions below – 2 pages
2. The project timeline should be filled in (template to be filled in and the example is attached attached) – please add the information in the timeline
3. Monitoring plan and swat template attached – PowerPoint template – please add the information in the timeline
4. Two Page final pitch – please see the instructions below – two-page template provided to be completed
5. Final presentation template to be completed – template provided to be completed
I would like clear and specific responses to support the following to support my project:
This deliverable has three parts, an implementation narrative, a monitoring plan, and a SWOT analysis — that together form the blueprint for putting your solution into practice. You will also use your implementation plan to complete a Gantt Chart that visually maps out the key activities, responsible parties, and milestones over the six-month period.
Assignment Steps Part 1: Implementation Narrative An implementation plan is a roadmap that explains how a project will be carried out. It translates your ideas and design into concrete actions, detailing what will happen, who will do it, when it will occur, and how progress will be measured.
1. Main Goals and Focus • What are the main goals of your project in the first six months of implementation? • What specific change or impact are you hoping to see as a result of your efforts? • How will you know that progress is being made toward these goals?
2. Objectives • What 2–4 specific, measurable, and time-bound objectives will guide your work during this period? • How do these objectives connect to your overall project goals and design? • What evidence or indicators will show that you’ve met each objective? • Which objectives are most feasible to accomplish within the first six months, given your organization’s current capacity?
3. Approach and Key Activities • What are the key activities or strategies you’ll implement to achieve your objectives? • Who will be responsible for leading or carrying out each activity? • What community partners, agencies, or collaborators will be involved, and how will they contribute?
4. Timeline and Milestones • How will you phase your activities over the first six months? • What are the most important milestones you expect to reach, and by when?
5. Anticipated Outcomes • What short-term results do you expect to see by the end of the six months? • How will these results move your project closer to your long-term vision?
2 Part 2: Gantt Chart After completing your Implementation Narrative, translate your plan into a visual Gantt chart using the provided template. Your Gantt chart should visually mirror your implementation plan – it is the same story told in a timeline format. Your Gantt chart should: • List each major activity or task aligned to your objectives. • Identify the person or partner responsible for completing it. • Include start and end dates for each activity. • Highlight milestones (key checkpoints or deliverables).
Part 3: Monitoring Plan A monitoring plan explains how you will track progress toward your goals. It specifies what data will be collected, who will collect it, how often it will be reviewed and how findings will be used to make improvements along the way. 1. Performance Measures • What data will you collect to track progress toward your goals? • Who will collect it, and how will it be stored or analyzed? • If you collect personally identifiable information (PII), how will you protect it? 2. Reporting and Feedback • Who needs updates on your progress (e.g., funders, community partners, leadership)? • How and how often will you report back? • How will feedback or data findings be used to adjust your approach?
Part 4: SWOT Analysis A SWOT analysis helps you assess your readiness for implementation by examining internal and external factors that may influence your success. 1. Strengths • What assets, skills or resources does your organization or project have that give it an advantage? 2. Weaknesses • What internal challenges, limitations or gaps could hinder success? 3. Opportunities • What external trends, partnerships or community conditions could help your project succeed? 4. Threats • What external risks, barriers, or competition could pose challenges?
Things to Avoid • Writing a list of tasks without describing the “why” or “how” behind them. • Setting vague or overly ambitious goals. • Skipping performance tracking or feedback mechanisms. • Overlooking internal weaknesses or external threats in your SWOT
\
CVILACapstoneSituationAnalysis_S.Leavyfinaldraft.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cvilacapstonesituationanalysis-s-leavyfinaldraft-docx "CVILACapstoneSituationAnalysis_S.Leavyfinaldraft.docx")
\
CapstoneDeliverable3.ProjectDesign.ShakithaLeavySeptemeber2025.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/capstonedeliverable3-projectdesign-shakithaleavyseptemeber2025-docx-10430457 "CapstoneDeliverable3.ProjectDesign.ShakithaLeavySeptemeber2025.docx")
\
CopyofCVILACapstonImplementationTimeline_GanttChart_TEMPLATE.xlsx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/copyofcvilacapstonimplementationtimeline-ganttchart-template-xlsx "CopyofCVILACapstonImplementationTimeline_GanttChart_TEMPLATE.xlsx")
\
CVILACapstoneImplementationPlanMonitoringPlanandSWOT-TEMPLATE.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cvilacapstoneimplementationplanmonitoringplanandswot-template-pptx "CVILACapstoneImplementationPlanMonitoringPlanandSWOT-TEMPLATE.pptx")
\
CVILACapstoneTwo-PagerFinalPitchGUIDE.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cvilacapstonetwo-pagerfinalpitchguide-pdf "CVILACapstoneTwo-PagerFinalPitchGUIDE.pdf")
\
CVILACapstoneFinalTwo-PagerTEMPLATE.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cvilacapstonefinaltwo-pagertemplate-docx "CVILACapstoneFinalTwo-PagerTEMPLATE.docx")
\
CVILACapstoneFinalPresentationTEMPLATE.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cvilacapstonefinalpresentationtemplate-pptx "CVILACapstoneFinalPresentationTEMPLATE.pptx")
\
CVILACapstoneTwo-PagerFinalPitchGUIDE.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cvilacapstonetwo-pagerfinalpitchguide-pdf-10430475 "CVILACapstoneTwo-PagerFinalPitchGUIDE.pdf")

November 5, 2026
[Solved] SCMT699

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

please read attachments for assignment – ## Feedbackfromweek10.docx – ## Week12Assignment.docx – DeWeeseWeek10GRADEDContinuePaper.docx **## Feedbackfromweek10.docx** Feedback from week 10 Please address your design before your next submission. Its how you are going to go about conducting your resear…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

please read attachments for assignment

– ## Feedbackfromweek10.docx

– ## Week12Assignment.docx

– DeWeeseWeek10GRADEDContinuePaper.docx

**## Feedbackfromweek10.docx**

Feedback from week 10

Please address your design before your next submission. Its how you are going to go about conducting your research so other can duplicate it.

This is a good book on it.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

approaches 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications

I am attaching a sample design section.

Look at approved AMU thesis, design section.

Teachers Comments on week 10 paper to address

Page 15:
![A screenshot of a computer](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/scmt699-20945463)

Page 16:
![A screenshot of a computer](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/scmt699-20945463)

## image1.png

## image2.png

**## Week12Assignment.docx**

Findings/Results/Discussion – Week 12

**Instructions**

For this assignment you will write the Findings/Results/Discussion section of your thesis. Set forth below is the explanation for this section from the
_End of Program Manual_(EOP):

Findings/Results/Discussion: This section describes the results of the study. Keep in mind that the "results" are the direct observations of the research, while the "discussion" is the interpretation of the results and research. This should include, as appropriate:

· results, including tables, graphs, statistics;

· significance and interpretation of the results;

· discussion of results as they relate to thesis statement/research question;

· discussion of results as it relates to the theoretical framework/approach; and

· directions for future research.

**Technical Requirements**

· Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.

· Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.

· Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.

· Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.

· All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

**DeWeeseWeek10GRADEDContinuePaper.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/deweeseweek10gradedcontinuepaper-docx)

**DeWeeseWeek10GRADEDContinuePaper.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/deweeseweek10gradedcontinuepaper-docx)

**## Feedbackfromweek10.docx**

Feedback from week 10

Please address your design before your next submission. Its how you are going to go about conducting your research so other can duplicate it.

This is a good book on it.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

approaches 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications

I am attaching a sample design section.

Look at approved AMU thesis, design section.

Teachers Comments on week 10 paper to address

Page 15:
![A screenshot of a computer](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/scmt699-20945463)

Page 16:
![A screenshot of a computer](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/scmt699-20945463)

## image1.png

## image2.png

**## Week12Assignment.docx**

Findings/Results/Discussion – Week 12

**Instructions**

For this assignment you will write the Findings/Results/Discussion section of your thesis. Set forth below is the explanation for this section from the
_End of Program Manual_(EOP):

Findings/Results/Discussion: This section describes the results of the study. Keep in mind that the "results" are the direct observations of the research, while the "discussion" is the interpretation of the results and research. This should include, as appropriate:

· results, including tables, graphs, statistics;

· significance and interpretation of the results;

· discussion of results as they relate to thesis statement/research question;

· discussion of results as it relates to the theoretical framework/approach; and

· directions for future research.

**Technical Requirements**

· Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.

· Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.

· Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.

· Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.

· All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

**DeWeeseWeek10GRADEDContinuePaper.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/deweeseweek10gradedcontinuepaper-docx)

**## Feedbackfromweek10.docx**

Feedback from week 10

Please address your design before your next submission. Its how you are going to go about conducting your research so other can duplicate it.

This is a good book on it.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

approaches 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications

I am attaching a sample design section.

Look at approved AMU thesis, design section.

Teachers Comments on week 10 paper to address

Page 15:
![A screenshot of a computer](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/scmt699-20945463)

Page 16:
![A screenshot of a computer](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/scmt699-20945463)

## image1.png

## image2.png

**## Week12Assignment.docx**

Findings/Results/Discussion – Week 12

**Instructions**

For this assignment you will write the Findings/Results/Discussion section of your thesis. Set forth below is the explanation for this section from the
_End of Program Manual_(EOP):

Findings/Results/Discussion: This section describes the results of the study. Keep in mind that the "results" are the direct observations of the research, while the "discussion" is the interpretation of the results and research. This should include, as appropriate:

· results, including tables, graphs, statistics;

· significance and interpretation of the results;

· discussion of results as they relate to thesis statement/research question;

· discussion of results as it relates to the theoretical framework/approach; and

· directions for future research.

**Technical Requirements**

· Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.

· Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.

· Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.

· Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.

· All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

**DeWeeseWeek10GRADEDContinuePaper.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/deweeseweek10gradedcontinuepaper-docx)

– 1
– 2
– 3

November 5, 2026