My Blog

Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Title

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    There is nothing more fundamental to nursing than the ability of nurses to care. “Caring is the essence of nursing” (Watson 1999, p. 33). This holistic, person-centered approach emphasizes cultural competence, which the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) defines as “the ability to ef…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    There is nothing more fundamental to nursing than the ability of nurses to care. “Caring is the essence of nursing” (Watson 1999, p. 33). This holistic, person-centered approach emphasizes cultural competence, which the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) defines as “the ability to effectively work within the client’s cultural context.”
    Nurses can use informatics to champion and support initiatives that reduce harm, keep patients safe, improve quality outcomes, and decrease the amount of time patients spend in a hospital. But can informatics be used to care for the sick?
    A 525- to 700-word paragraph.

  • [Solved] IVA- BIO 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    -SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS -RUBRIC ATTACHED -1 PAGE – It should include 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA. -CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN 10% OF PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT, WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN -DUE DATE OCTOBER 21, 2025 \ RUBRIC2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    -SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
    -RUBRIC ATTACHED
    -1 PAGE
    – It should include 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
    -CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN 10% OF PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT, WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN
    -DUE DATE OCTOBER 21, 2025
    \
    RUBRIC2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric2-pdf-10430715 "RUBRIC2.pdf")
    \
    ASSIGNMENT2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment2-pdf-10430717 "ASSIGNMENT2.pdf")

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Your organization has made it a priority that safety is taken into consideration when making clinical decisions. There is an opportunity to find an informatics or technology solution to improve the safety and overall well-being of patients. **Select** an information technology you believe will benef…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Your organization has made it a priority that safety is taken into consideration when making clinical decisions. There is an opportunity to find an informatics or technology solution to improve the safety and overall well-being of patients.
    **Select** an information technology you believe will benefit your organization. If your organization is currently using a similar product, you will compare the new technology to the one being used right now. For example, you have selected Epic for the electronic health record because your organization is currently using Meditech, which is outdated. In this case, you will compare Epic to Meditech.
    If you have selected a technology your organization is not currently using, you will need to locate another one that is commercially equivalent to the one you selected. For example, your organization does not use integrated vital sign machines but you believe they will provide a significant benefit to the organization and you have selected Philips. You will need to locate another integrated vital sign machine, such as Vital Link to compare to.
    **Determine** what 5 criteria are most important for evaluating the product, safety being foremost. Other possible criteria might be ease of use, clarity, time, etc.
    **Examine** the 2 products and compare and contrast their strengths and weaknesses.
    **Evaluate** the 2 products using the 5 criteria you determined to be the most important.
    **Create** a 15- to 20-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes in which you:
    – Provide a detailed description of the 2 products and include your rationale for selecting one brand over the others.
    – Explain how the selected products could mitigate the administrative or clinical problem.
    – Present the result of your product evaluation. Your product evaluation should answer the following required questions:
    – What are the strengths and weaknesses of each product?
    – How does each product compare when assessed on the 5 criteria you determined to be most important?
    – What clinical outcomes are associated with each product? Is there evidence to support that the product is effective and safe?
    – Will the product integrate easily with your hospital's existing systems?
    – Does the product require any special training or expertise to use?
    – Can the product scale to meet the needs of your hospital as it grows?
    – Which product would be best for your organization?
    – Describe two ways you would implement the product.
    – Describe two evaluation methods. Address any relevant regulatory, legal, or ethical issues as a result of using the product.
    **Include** a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed sources. The product websites count toward this.
    **Cite** your sources according to APA guidelines.

  • [Solved] Health Field Human Resource Management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this assignment, you will do a reflection on the lessons learned throughout the course. Provide two points of learning from each unit. Tie what you learned to how it will help you in your future or current career. Reflection must be at least two pages in length. Sources are not required for this…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this assignment, you will do a reflection on the lessons learned throughout the course. Provide two points of learning from each unit. Tie what you learned to how it will help you in your future or current career.
    Reflection must be at least two pages in length. Sources are not required for this assignment.
    \
    Unit3studyguide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit3studyguide-pdf-10430741 "Unit3studyguide.pdf")
    \
    Unit4StudyGuide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit4studyguide-pdf-10430743 "Unit4StudyGuide.pdf")
    \
    Unit2StudyGuide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit2studyguide-pdf-10430745 "Unit2StudyGuide.pdf")
    \
    Unit7StudyGuide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit7studyguide-pdf-10430747 "Unit7StudyGuide.pdf")
    \
    Unit1StudyGuide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit1studyguide-pdf-10430749 "Unit1StudyGuide.pdf")
    \
    Unit6StudyGuide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit6studyguide-pdf-10430751 "Unit6StudyGuide.pdf")
    \
    Unit5StudyGuide.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unit5studyguide-pdf-10430753 "Unit5StudyGuide.pdf")

  • [Solved] Government Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Government Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## JournalAssignment.pdf **## JournalAssignment.pdf** Journal Assignment: If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal, laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more words laying out the best evidence to fi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## JournalAssignment.pdf

    **## JournalAssignment.pdf**

    Journal Assignment:

    If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal,
    laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more
    words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team Jury, you will do
    300 words on each (600 total). Present your case as an extended argument, convincing
    yourself (and your classmates) why whatever you believe is the objective truth.

    Below is an optional set of instructions/prompts to help you build and organize your cases
    for the journal and best practices, such as Prosecution offering discovery to the Defense.
    Also attached is guides for Opening Statements and How to handle Objections. Email me if
    you have any questions.

    Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Prosecution:

    1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

    o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

    o What key pieces of evidence/witnesses from these pages are most crucial to
    your case? List and explain why they are important to proving the defendant's
    guilt.

    o Are there any potential weaknesses/counterarguments related to the
    evidence that you need to address preemptively?

    o Identify any connections between pieces of evidence/witnesses that could
    strengthen your argument or create a narrative thread for the jury.

    o You must email a copy of this called “discovery” to the defense attorneys a
    week before the trial.

    2. Building Your Argument:

    o How will you introduce the case and engage the jury’s attention? Think about
    how to establish the facts clearly and persuasively from the outset.

    o What points do you intend to make to convince the jury of the defendant's
    guilt? Outline them in a logical sequence.

    o Ensure each point logically leads to the next. How can you make sure your
    argument is cohesive and flows naturally as you walk the jury through the
    evidence.

    o For example, you should establish that a crime was committed before
    arguing there was a conspiracy and only after that what part the accused
    played in that conspiracy.

    3. Rhetorical Strategy:

    o What rhetorical devices will you use to persuade the jury? Consider ethos,
    pathos, and logos, and how each can strengthen your argument. Ethos
    focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals to emotions, and logos
    relies on logic and reason.

    o Consider how you will respond to any potential rebuttals or defenses raised
    by the opposing side.

    4. Required Writing:

    o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

    o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Defense:

    1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

    o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

    o What traces make good evidence in the case? What evidence/witnesses
    might support your argument that the defendant is innocent, or what can you
    use to cast doubt on the prosecution's case?

    o Receive and read the prosecution’s discovery. Review the prosecution’s case
    as detailed in their discovery. Are there any pieces of evidence you can
    discredit or reinterpret? How will you challenge the reliability or credibility of
    the evidence presented?

    o What inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence can you highlight to weaken the
    prosecution's argument?

    2. Building Your Argument:

    o How will you open your defense to the jury? Think about how to introduce the
    idea that reasonable doubt exists.

    o What are the primary points you need to make to show the defendant's
    innocence or cast doubt on their guilt? Structure these points logically.

    o How will you ensure your argument flows clearly, with each point supporting
    the next and culminating in a strong conclusion?

    3. Rhetorical Strategy:

    o How will you use rhetoric to create empathy for the defendant and engage
    the jury emotionally? What tone will you adopt to convey sincerity and
    credibility?

    o How can you use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the jury of your
    argument’s merit? Ethos focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals
    to emotions, and logos relies on logic and reason.

    o What preemptive counterarguments can you anticipate from the
    prosecution, and how will you respond to them?

    4. Required Writing:

    o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

    o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    Yuzu Reader: Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict

    [https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170](https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170)

    **## JournalAssignment.pdf**

    Journal Assignment:

    If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal,
    laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more
    words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team Jury, you will do
    300 words on each (600 total). Present your case as an extended argument, convincing
    yourself (and your classmates) why whatever you believe is the objective truth.

    Below is an optional set of instructions/prompts to help you build and organize your cases
    for the journal and best practices, such as Prosecution offering discovery to the Defense.
    Also attached is guides for Opening Statements and How to handle Objections. Email me if
    you have any questions.

    Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Prosecution:

    1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

    o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

    o What key pieces of evidence/witnesses from these pages are most crucial to
    your case? List and explain why they are important to proving the defendant's
    guilt.

    o Are there any potential weaknesses/counterarguments related to the
    evidence that you need to address preemptively?

    o Identify any connections between pieces of evidence/witnesses that could
    strengthen your argument or create a narrative thread for the jury.

    o You must email a copy of this called “discovery” to the defense attorneys a
    week before the trial.

    2. Building Your Argument:

    o How will you introduce the case and engage the jury’s attention? Think about
    how to establish the facts clearly and persuasively from the outset.

    o What points do you intend to make to convince the jury of the defendant's
    guilt? Outline them in a logical sequence.

    o Ensure each point logically leads to the next. How can you make sure your
    argument is cohesive and flows naturally as you walk the jury through the
    evidence.

    o For example, you should establish that a crime was committed before
    arguing there was a conspiracy and only after that what part the accused
    played in that conspiracy.

    3. Rhetorical Strategy:

    o What rhetorical devices will you use to persuade the jury? Consider ethos,
    pathos, and logos, and how each can strengthen your argument. Ethos
    focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals to emotions, and logos
    relies on logic and reason.

    o Consider how you will respond to any potential rebuttals or defenses raised
    by the opposing side.

    4. Required Writing:

    o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

    o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Defense:

    1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

    o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

    o What traces make good evidence in the case? What evidence/witnesses
    might support your argument that the defendant is innocent, or what can you
    use to cast doubt on the prosecution's case?

    o Receive and read the prosecution’s discovery. Review the prosecution’s case
    as detailed in their discovery. Are there any pieces of evidence you can
    discredit or reinterpret? How will you challenge the reliability or credibility of
    the evidence presented?

    o What inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence can you highlight to weaken the
    prosecution's argument?

    2. Building Your Argument:

    o How will you open your defense to the jury? Think about how to introduce the
    idea that reasonable doubt exists.

    o What are the primary points you need to make to show the defendant's
    innocence or cast doubt on their guilt? Structure these points logically.

    o How will you ensure your argument flows clearly, with each point supporting
    the next and culminating in a strong conclusion?

    3. Rhetorical Strategy:

    o How will you use rhetoric to create empathy for the defendant and engage
    the jury emotionally? What tone will you adopt to convey sincerity and
    credibility?

    o How can you use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the jury of your
    argument’s merit? Ethos focuses on the speaker's credibility, pathos appeals
    to emotions, and logos relies on logic and reason.

    o What preemptive counterarguments can you anticipate from the
    prosecution, and how will you respond to them?

    4. Required Writing:

    o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

    o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

    Yuzu Reader: Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict

    [https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170](https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9781478650225/pageid/170)

  • [Solved] 3 pages

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Discuss how to manage a recruitment and development programs as an entrepreneur of an imaginary newly formed business with at least two human resource management concepts and specific examples (including your or others experiences if available). What are the name and main products/services of the …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Discuss how to manage a recruitment and development programs as an entrepreneur of an imaginary newly formed business with at least two human resource management concepts and specific examples (including your or others experiences if available). What are the name and main products/services of the business? Support your discussion based on your expectations of at least one future HR (Human Resources) trend (In around 3 pages/ Double space available).**
    \
    Midterm_MGMT380_Fall2025.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/midterm-mgmt380-fall2025-docx-10430595 "Midterm_MGMT380_Fall2025.docx")

  • [Solved] BUSINESS (NO PLAGARISM A+ WORK, ON TIME)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Discussion & Respond – ## Week8.docx – Marketingplan.docx **## Week8.docx** **Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)** **Research** Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in. **Discuss** · What were the challenges…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Discussion & Respond

    – ## Week8.docx

    – Marketingplan.docx

    **## Week8.docx**

    **Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)**

    **Research**

    Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in.

    **Discuss**

    · What were the challenges and triumphs you encountered while writing your marketing plan?

    · What would the most significant challenges be to put this plan in place?

    · What controls did you put into place to ensure the success of your marketing plan?

    Respond to TG(No more than 150 words

    Class,

                    I hope everyone had a great eight weeks of learning. The marketing plan I developed focused on Maxwell House Coffee, a well-established brand facing notable challenges over the past decade. Through extensive research, I gained insights into the brand’s diverse product offerings and its storied heritage. However, this history became somewhat obscured when Kraft Heinz acquired the brand, followed by its subsequent purchase by an even larger conglomerate. Initially, my approach yielded positive results in evaluating product quality and leveraging traditional advertising methods.

    This momentum was disrupted when Maxwell House Coffee underwent its first rebranding in 133 years, becoming Maxwell Apartment. Launching a new marketing campaign immediately after a major rebranding posed risks of consumer confusion. Recognizing this, I incorporated the rebranding into my proposal rather than disregarding it. After thorough analysis of available information regarding the campaign, I determined that the initiative appeared to be more of a promotional tactic and risked alienating loyal customers. Consequently, I recommend a detailed strategy rooted in traditional advertising, emphasizing Maxwell House’s historical significance and its unique connection to American culture, appealing to a broad audience that includes both agricultural workers and political figures.

    Respond to Gm(No more than 150 words

    Marketing plans are an integral part of the success of businesses and overall sales plans. Weak marketing can lead to loss of revenue, poor relationships with customer and vendors, and failure of an organization in some cases. For these reasons, investment in a good marketing team and solid marketing plan can yield an excellent return on investment for a business.

    The biggest challenges I faced while writing my marketing plan were in relation to digging out information on competitors in the industry. Almost all are privately held organizations, so there is little information available to the public on their financial situations and other pertinent information. I had an advantage of being involved in this industry for the last 4 years, which did help in the marketing plan, giving me insight into the market that others may not have.

         My biggest triumph personally was putting together a marketing budget and figuring out the appropriation for those funds. This is something I’ve never done before, even as a GM running a business. Marketing activities are always handles by a corporate team, so putting together my own budget for one was really fun!

    The biggest challenge for putting this plan into place would definitely be incorporating the recent safety study in a digestible way for consumers. One of the biggest hurdles in growing market share for rubber mulch is the pre-existing notion that it is inherently toxic, and if IMC can overcome those stereotypes, they have opportunity to really grow their business. It’s just a lot of information for customers to take in, and hard to make into visually appealing marketing materials.

    Most of the controls I used in my plan are financially driven. We set measurable goals for market and revenue growth, and hitting those goals are the greatest control we can use. If we are falling short of the 7.5% increased sales revenue year over year, we can look for the indicators of where our marketing plan is falling short. Financial goals with clear parameters easily allow us to see where we are failing or where we are succeeding, and should be the first place we look when we are evaluating the success of this marketing plan.

    **Marketingplan.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

    **Marketingplan.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

    **## Week8.docx**

    **Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)**

    **Research**

    Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in.

    **Discuss**

    · What were the challenges and triumphs you encountered while writing your marketing plan?

    · What would the most significant challenges be to put this plan in place?

    · What controls did you put into place to ensure the success of your marketing plan?

    Respond to TG(No more than 150 words

    Class,

                    I hope everyone had a great eight weeks of learning. The marketing plan I developed focused on Maxwell House Coffee, a well-established brand facing notable challenges over the past decade. Through extensive research, I gained insights into the brand’s diverse product offerings and its storied heritage. However, this history became somewhat obscured when Kraft Heinz acquired the brand, followed by its subsequent purchase by an even larger conglomerate. Initially, my approach yielded positive results in evaluating product quality and leveraging traditional advertising methods.

    This momentum was disrupted when Maxwell House Coffee underwent its first rebranding in 133 years, becoming Maxwell Apartment. Launching a new marketing campaign immediately after a major rebranding posed risks of consumer confusion. Recognizing this, I incorporated the rebranding into my proposal rather than disregarding it. After thorough analysis of available information regarding the campaign, I determined that the initiative appeared to be more of a promotional tactic and risked alienating loyal customers. Consequently, I recommend a detailed strategy rooted in traditional advertising, emphasizing Maxwell House’s historical significance and its unique connection to American culture, appealing to a broad audience that includes both agricultural workers and political figures.

    Respond to Gm(No more than 150 words

    Marketing plans are an integral part of the success of businesses and overall sales plans. Weak marketing can lead to loss of revenue, poor relationships with customer and vendors, and failure of an organization in some cases. For these reasons, investment in a good marketing team and solid marketing plan can yield an excellent return on investment for a business.

    The biggest challenges I faced while writing my marketing plan were in relation to digging out information on competitors in the industry. Almost all are privately held organizations, so there is little information available to the public on their financial situations and other pertinent information. I had an advantage of being involved in this industry for the last 4 years, which did help in the marketing plan, giving me insight into the market that others may not have.

         My biggest triumph personally was putting together a marketing budget and figuring out the appropriation for those funds. This is something I’ve never done before, even as a GM running a business. Marketing activities are always handles by a corporate team, so putting together my own budget for one was really fun!

    The biggest challenge for putting this plan into place would definitely be incorporating the recent safety study in a digestible way for consumers. One of the biggest hurdles in growing market share for rubber mulch is the pre-existing notion that it is inherently toxic, and if IMC can overcome those stereotypes, they have opportunity to really grow their business. It’s just a lot of information for customers to take in, and hard to make into visually appealing marketing materials.

    Most of the controls I used in my plan are financially driven. We set measurable goals for market and revenue growth, and hitting those goals are the greatest control we can use. If we are falling short of the 7.5% increased sales revenue year over year, we can look for the indicators of where our marketing plan is falling short. Financial goals with clear parameters easily allow us to see where we are failing or where we are succeeding, and should be the first place we look when we are evaluating the success of this marketing plan.

    **Marketingplan.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

    **## Week8.docx**

    **Week 8 (No more than 200-250 words)**

    **Research**

    Research marketing plans(attached) and controls for success. Review information on your final paper topic and the industry it is in.

    **Discuss**

    · What were the challenges and triumphs you encountered while writing your marketing plan?

    · What would the most significant challenges be to put this plan in place?

    · What controls did you put into place to ensure the success of your marketing plan?

    Respond to TG(No more than 150 words

    Class,

                    I hope everyone had a great eight weeks of learning. The marketing plan I developed focused on Maxwell House Coffee, a well-established brand facing notable challenges over the past decade. Through extensive research, I gained insights into the brand’s diverse product offerings and its storied heritage. However, this history became somewhat obscured when Kraft Heinz acquired the brand, followed by its subsequent purchase by an even larger conglomerate. Initially, my approach yielded positive results in evaluating product quality and leveraging traditional advertising methods.

    This momentum was disrupted when Maxwell House Coffee underwent its first rebranding in 133 years, becoming Maxwell Apartment. Launching a new marketing campaign immediately after a major rebranding posed risks of consumer confusion. Recognizing this, I incorporated the rebranding into my proposal rather than disregarding it. After thorough analysis of available information regarding the campaign, I determined that the initiative appeared to be more of a promotional tactic and risked alienating loyal customers. Consequently, I recommend a detailed strategy rooted in traditional advertising, emphasizing Maxwell House’s historical significance and its unique connection to American culture, appealing to a broad audience that includes both agricultural workers and political figures.

    Respond to Gm(No more than 150 words

    Marketing plans are an integral part of the success of businesses and overall sales plans. Weak marketing can lead to loss of revenue, poor relationships with customer and vendors, and failure of an organization in some cases. For these reasons, investment in a good marketing team and solid marketing plan can yield an excellent return on investment for a business.

    The biggest challenges I faced while writing my marketing plan were in relation to digging out information on competitors in the industry. Almost all are privately held organizations, so there is little information available to the public on their financial situations and other pertinent information. I had an advantage of being involved in this industry for the last 4 years, which did help in the marketing plan, giving me insight into the market that others may not have.

         My biggest triumph personally was putting together a marketing budget and figuring out the appropriation for those funds. This is something I’ve never done before, even as a GM running a business. Marketing activities are always handles by a corporate team, so putting together my own budget for one was really fun!

    The biggest challenge for putting this plan into place would definitely be incorporating the recent safety study in a digestible way for consumers. One of the biggest hurdles in growing market share for rubber mulch is the pre-existing notion that it is inherently toxic, and if IMC can overcome those stereotypes, they have opportunity to really grow their business. It’s just a lot of information for customers to take in, and hard to make into visually appealing marketing materials.

    Most of the controls I used in my plan are financially driven. We set measurable goals for market and revenue growth, and hitting those goals are the greatest control we can use. If we are falling short of the 7.5% increased sales revenue year over year, we can look for the indicators of where our marketing plan is falling short. Financial goals with clear parameters easily allow us to see where we are failing or where we are succeeding, and should be the first place we look when we are evaluating the success of this marketing plan.

    **Marketingplan.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/marketingplan-docx-10430761)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Education I need help with homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help with homework – ## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx – ## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx **## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx** _Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help with homework

    – ## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx

    – ## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx

    **## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx**

    _Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    You should make sure that you are utilizing the resources that are outlined within this course.

    To engage students in instruction that integrates social studies and the arts, teachers need to use a variety of questioning strategies. Questioning engages students’ depth of knowledge and promotes problem-solving and higher-order thinking.

    You have been asked to present a professional development on the use of questioning strategies. Examine questioning strategies that develop higher-order skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking appropriate for the chosen grade level in the Topic 1 assignment.

    **Part 1: GoReact Presentation**

    Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation for the staff in which you outline the use of questioning strategies, assessments, and digital tools, and provide examples of probing questions related to the Topic 1 activity. Once the presentation is created, choose a screencast software to present the information. You will narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

    Your presentation should include:

    · A brief description of each depth of knowledge level (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) with an explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    · A variety of five probing questions for each level that can be used as pre-assessment, formative, and/or summative assessment questions during the activity developed in Topic 1. Remember, these questions should activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    · At least one strategy for implementing these questions in a formative assessment during the learning activity developed in Topic 1, and one summative assessment strategy that measures student learning after the activity. Include the questions that will be used for each and a brief justification of why they were chosen.

    · At least two digital tools with a justification of how they support students in developing their own high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    You can access this assignment in two ways: through the calendar view or the Topic content. To begin working, click the 'Open Assignment' button.

    Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

    **Part 2: Reflection**

    Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least
    **_two specific comments_** by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

    · Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

    · A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

    Support the presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides.

    **_Note:_** _The digital presentation may be added as an artifact to the teacher toolkit you created in ELM-555._

    Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.

    Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

    Use an online video platform such as Loom or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others can access and view your linked video before submitting the assignment.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric in GoReact. Review the rubric in GoReact before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

    **## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

    ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

    0 / 9

    **Description of DoK Level**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

    Approaching

    An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

    Acceptable

    An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    Target

    A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    0 / 12

    **Five Probing Questions**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Approaching

    Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Acceptable

    Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Target

    Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    0 / 12

    **Formative and Summative Assessment**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

    Approaching

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

    Acceptable

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

    Target

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

    0 / 9

    **Digital Tools**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

    Approaching

    At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Acceptable

    At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Target

    Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Strength**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Target

    An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Growth**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Target

    A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Professionalism**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

    Approaching

    The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

    Acceptable

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

    Target

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

    0 / 3

    **Layout**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

    Approaching

    The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

    Acceptable

    The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

    Target

    The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

    0 / 3

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Approaching

    Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

    Acceptable

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Target

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    0 / 3

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    **Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

    **Required**

    **Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
    **_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

    **… Read More**

    **https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

    ****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

    ****Required****

    ****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

    ****… Read More****

    ****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

    ****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

    ****Required****

    ****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

    ****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

    ****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

    ****Required****

    ****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

    ****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

    ****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

    ****Required****

    ****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
    ****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

    **## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

    ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

    0 / 9

    **Description of DoK Level**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

    Approaching

    An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

    Acceptable

    An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    Target

    A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    0 / 12

    **Five Probing Questions**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Approaching

    Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Acceptable

    Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Target

    Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    0 / 12

    **Formative and Summative Assessment**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

    Approaching

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

    Acceptable

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

    Target

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

    0 / 9

    **Digital Tools**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

    Approaching

    At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Acceptable

    At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Target

    Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Strength**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Target

    An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Growth**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Target

    A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Professionalism**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

    Approaching

    The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

    Acceptable

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

    Target

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

    0 / 3

    **Layout**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

    Approaching

    The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

    Acceptable

    The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

    Target

    The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

    0 / 3

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Approaching

    Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

    Acceptable

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Target

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    0 / 3

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    **Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

    **Required**

    **Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
    **_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

    **… Read More**

    **https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

    ****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

    ****Required****

    ****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

    ****… Read More****

    ****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

    ****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

    ****Required****

    ****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

    ****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

    ****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

    ****Required****

    ****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

    ****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

    ****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

    ****Required****

    ****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
    ****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

    **## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx**

    _Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    You should make sure that you are utilizing the resources that are outlined within this course.

    To engage students in instruction that integrates social studies and the arts, teachers need to use a variety of questioning strategies. Questioning engages students’ depth of knowledge and promotes problem-solving and higher-order thinking.

    You have been asked to present a professional development on the use of questioning strategies. Examine questioning strategies that develop higher-order skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking appropriate for the chosen grade level in the Topic 1 assignment.

    **Part 1: GoReact Presentation**

    Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation for the staff in which you outline the use of questioning strategies, assessments, and digital tools, and provide examples of probing questions related to the Topic 1 activity. Once the presentation is created, choose a screencast software to present the information. You will narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

    Your presentation should include:

    · A brief description of each depth of knowledge level (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) with an explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    · A variety of five probing questions for each level that can be used as pre-assessment, formative, and/or summative assessment questions during the activity developed in Topic 1. Remember, these questions should activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    · At least one strategy for implementing these questions in a formative assessment during the learning activity developed in Topic 1, and one summative assessment strategy that measures student learning after the activity. Include the questions that will be used for each and a brief justification of why they were chosen.

    · At least two digital tools with a justification of how they support students in developing their own high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    You can access this assignment in two ways: through the calendar view or the Topic content. To begin working, click the 'Open Assignment' button.

    Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

    **Part 2: Reflection**

    Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least
    **_two specific comments_** by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

    · Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

    · A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

    Support the presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides.

    **_Note:_** _The digital presentation may be added as an artifact to the teacher toolkit you created in ELM-555._

    Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.

    Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

    Use an online video platform such as Loom or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others can access and view your linked video before submitting the assignment.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric in GoReact. Review the rubric in GoReact before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

    **## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

    ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

    0 / 9

    **Description of DoK Level**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

    Approaching

    An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

    Acceptable

    An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    Target

    A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    0 / 12

    **Five Probing Questions**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Approaching

    Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Acceptable

    Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Target

    Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    0 / 12

    **Formative and Summative Assessment**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

    Approaching

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

    Acceptable

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

    Target

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

    0 / 9

    **Digital Tools**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

    Approaching

    At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Acceptable

    At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Target

    Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Strength**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Target

    An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Growth**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Target

    A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Professionalism**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

    Approaching

    The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

    Acceptable

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

    Target

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

    0 / 3

    **Layout**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

    Approaching

    The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

    Acceptable

    The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

    Target

    The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

    0 / 3

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Approaching

    Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

    Acceptable

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Target

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    0 / 3

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    **Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

    **Required**

    **Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
    **_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

    **… Read More**

    **https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

    ****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

    ****Required****

    ****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

    ****… Read More****

    ****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

    ****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

    ****Required****

    ****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

    ****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

    ****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

    ****Required****

    ****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

    ****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

    ****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

    ****Required****

    ****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
    ****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

    **## QuestioningStrategiesforaVarietyofPurposesweek2assignment.docx**

    _Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes_ is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    You should make sure that you are utilizing the resources that are outlined within this course.

    To engage students in instruction that integrates social studies and the arts, teachers need to use a variety of questioning strategies. Questioning engages students’ depth of knowledge and promotes problem-solving and higher-order thinking.

    You have been asked to present a professional development on the use of questioning strategies. Examine questioning strategies that develop higher-order skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking appropriate for the chosen grade level in the Topic 1 assignment.

    **Part 1: GoReact Presentation**

    Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation for the staff in which you outline the use of questioning strategies, assessments, and digital tools, and provide examples of probing questions related to the Topic 1 activity. Once the presentation is created, choose a screencast software to present the information. You will narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

    Your presentation should include:

    · A brief description of each depth of knowledge level (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) with an explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    · A variety of five probing questions for each level that can be used as pre-assessment, formative, and/or summative assessment questions during the activity developed in Topic 1. Remember, these questions should activate prior knowledge, encourage local and global exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    · At least one strategy for implementing these questions in a formative assessment during the learning activity developed in Topic 1, and one summative assessment strategy that measures student learning after the activity. Include the questions that will be used for each and a brief justification of why they were chosen.

    · At least two digital tools with a justification of how they support students in developing their own high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    You can access this assignment in two ways: through the calendar view or the Topic content. To begin working, click the 'Open Assignment' button.

    Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

    **Part 2: Reflection**

    Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least
    **_two specific comments_** by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

    · Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

    · A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

    Support the presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides.

    **_Note:_** _The digital presentation may be added as an artifact to the teacher toolkit you created in ELM-555._

    Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.

    Remember, video and audio quality are essential and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

    Use an online video platform such as Loom or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others can access and view your linked video before submitting the assignment.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric in GoReact. Review the rubric in GoReact before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

    **## RubricandRequiredReferencesforweek2assignment.docx**

    ELM-550 Topic 2 Rubric: Questioning Strategies

    0 / 9

    **Description of DoK Level**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Flawed descriptions of each depth of knowledge level are included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is missing or incorrect.

    Approaching

    An unfocused description of each depth of knowledge level is included, and the explanation of the types of questions asked at each level is underdeveloped.

    Acceptable

    An accurate description of each depth of knowledge level is provided, along with a logical and concise explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    Target

    A comprehensive description of each depth of knowledge level is included, along with an extensive and insightful explanation of the types of questions asked at each level.

    0 / 12

    **Five Probing Questions**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Poorly created probing questions for each level are included. Questions do not activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop high-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Approaching

    Probing questions for each level are unclear. Questions somewhat activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Acceptable

    Probing questions for each level are clear. Questions effectively activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and/or promote problem-solving.

    Target

    Probing questions for each level are extensive and ideal. Innovative questions are included to activate prior knowledge, encourage exploration, develop higher-order questioning skills, and promote problem-solving.

    0 / 12

    **Formative and Summative Assessment**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is unrealistic, and/or the summative assessment strategy is inadequate for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. Fails to include the questions to be used or a justification for why they were chosen.

    Approaching

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is vague, and the summative assessment strategy is weak for measuring student learning after the activity. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, lack detail.

    Acceptable

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is suitable, and the summative assessment strategy is reasonable for measuring student learning after the activity. Questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their selection, are soundly included.

    Target

    The strategy for implementing questions in a formative assessment is purposeful, and the summative assessment strategy is ideal for measuring student learning after the activity has taken place. The questions to be used, along with a brief justification for their choice, are innovative and insightful.

    0 / 9

    **Digital Tools**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Fewer than two digital tools are included, or they provide poor justification for how these tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulating discussion, and promoting inquiry and critical thinking.

    Approaching

    At least two digital tools are vaguely included with minimal justification of how the tools support students in developing higher-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Acceptable

    At least two digital tools are adequately included, with logical justification of how these tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    Target

    Two or more digital tools are expertly included with insightful justification of how tools support students in developing high-order questioning skills, stimulate discussion, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Strength**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    A vague explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of the most significant strength is provided.

    Target

    An insightful and meaningful explanation of the most significant strength is provided. The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the strength occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Reflection: Growth**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    An unfocused explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Approaching

    A basic explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Acceptable

    A clear explanation of where the presentation and delivery could be improved to help growth as a future educator is provided.

    Target

    A place where the presentation and delivery could be improved to support growth as a future educator is insightfully and thoroughly provided.  The comment is appropriately bookmarked in the correct place where the development occurred.

    0 / 3

    **Professionalism**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional, or the video is taken in a distracting environment or background.

    Approaching

    The appearance or manner within the video lacks some degree of professionalism, or the footage includes distractions in the environment or background.

    Acceptable

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

    Target

    The appearance and mannerisms exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

    0 / 3

    **Layout**

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    The layout is cluttered, confusing, and lacks effective use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The text is complex to read due to its long blocks of text, small font size, and inappropriate color contrasts. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

    Approaching

    The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy, or distracting due to significant gaps in white space or an unappealing background. Lengthy paragraphs, multiple fonts, a dark or busy background, excessive bolding, or inadequate text indentations hinder overall readability.

    Acceptable

    The layout, background, and text complement each other, enabling the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and the point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

    Target

    The layout is visually pleasing and effectively contributes to the overall message through the appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The text is appropriately concise for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

    0 / 3

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    No Submission

    Not addressed.

    Insufficient

    Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Approaching

    Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

    Acceptable

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Target

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to the assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    0 / 3

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    **Webb’s Depth of Knowledge**

    **Required**

    **Read “Webb’s Depth of Knowledge,” by Marshall, from**
    **_Rise to the Challenge: Designing Rigorous Learning That Maximiz_**

    **… Read More**

    **https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=5829696&ppg=78**

    ****Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework****

    ****Required****

    ****Read “Lights, Camera, Student Voice: Using Technology to Address and Explore Economics Within the C3 Framework,” by Carr and****

    ****… Read More****

    ****https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1251424&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost****

    ****Bloom’s Taxonomy****

    ****Required****

    ****View the “Bloom’s Taxonomy” interactive media element.****

    ****https://lc.gcumedia.com/are337/blooms-taxonomy/v2.1/****

    ****Understanding Depth of Knowledge****

    ****Required****

    ****Review "Understanding Depth of Knowledge," by Klint, located on the Renaissance website (2021).****

    ****https://www.renaissance.com/20****

    ****Social Studies in Elementary Education****

    ****Required****

    ****Beck, T & Parker, W. (2022)****
    ****_Social studies in elementary education_. (16th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780135762035****

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Nursing LAU ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS -YOU CAN SELECT A TOPIC IN ADULT POPULATION NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM ACCEPTED THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN REFERENCES MUST BE SCHOLARLY WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS ASSIGNMENT IN APA 7TH EDITION FORMAT 'CHECK YOUR GRAMMA…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
    -YOU CAN SELECT A TOPIC IN ADULT POPULATION
    NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM ACCEPTED
    THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN
    REFERENCES MUST BE SCHOLARLY WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS
    ASSIGNMENT IN APA 7TH EDITION FORMAT
    'CHECK YOUR GRAMMAR AND SPELLING
    3 PAGES
    DUE DATE OCTOBER 21, 2025 NO LATER
    MUST MEET EACH REQUIREMENT AND SECTION EXPLAINED IN THE DOCUMENT
    \
    Assignment.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment-pdf-10430609 "Assignment.pdf")