Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] DBs 5&6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. The CEO at your present employer has been so impressed with your knowledge of finance that you have been promoted to the CFO position! Congratulations! You now need to advise the CEO on some upcoming strategic initiatives that will have long-term implications for your company. In other words, th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1.
    The CEO at your present employer has been so impressed with your knowledge of finance that you have been promoted to the CFO position! Congratulations! You now need to advise the CEO on some upcoming strategic initiatives that will have long-term implications for your company. In other words, these are important decisions.
    For your initial discussion forum post, address the following questions posed by the CEO:
    – It appears we may need to raise more capital. Is issuing debt a good idea? Why or why not? And should our given assets impact this decision?
    – In the current economic environment, should we issue bonds, common stock, or preferred stock? What would be some pros and cons?
    – Or should we forego this immediate opportunity and buy back some of our outstanding common stock? What market conditions would make this a good move; what might be some pros and cons?
    – Should we issue a dividend, or should we retain cash in the company for future opportunities? How might this impact future growth? Are we obligated to pay our shareholders a dividend?
    Your initial response should be a minimum of 300 words. At least 2 credible scholarly references
    DB 6
    1.
    As CFO in your current organization, you have been told that your company wishes to expand its operations internationally. Your first assignment is to explain to the CEO and their staff the importance of understanding the difference between domestic expansion and international expansion.
    For your initial discussion post, consider the following questions as a basis to your explanation to the CEO and staff:
    – Why is foreign investment so different from domestic investment?
    – What should C-Level executives consider in expanding internationally, as compared to domestically?
    – What types of risk mitigation techniques could you suggest to the executives so that the firm can be successful in the proposed expansion?
    Your initial response should be a minimum of 200 words. At least 1 credible scholarly resource
    2.
    As part of your CFO responsibilities, you are also the cash manager of your multinational corporation (MNC) which is based in the United States. One of your responsibilities is to gain the highest yield for your treasury cash. Complete the following:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us
    – Visit the [_Markets: United States Rates & Bonds_](http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us)_-_ webpage and click on a country to review its interest rates.
    – Select a country to invest in for one year.
    – Describe why you chose that country and your expected yield for the next year.
    Your initial response should be a minimum of 200 words. At least 1 credible scholarly reference

  • [Solved] Walmart Expansion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://www.sec.gov/search-filings – Review the current financial statements of Walmart. – Option 1: [_EDGAR | Company Filings_](https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html) database – Enter "Walmart Inc." in the search bar – Option 2: [_Yahoo! Finance_](https://finance.yahoo.com/) web…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://www.sec.gov/search-filings
    – Review the current financial statements of Walmart.
    – Option 1: [_EDGAR | Company Filings_](https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html) database
    – Enter "Walmart Inc." in the search bar
    – Option 2: [_Yahoo! Finance_](https://finance.yahoo.com/) webpage
    – Enter the stock symbol of Walmart, Inc. (WMT) in the search bar
    – Click on the “Financials” tab
    In prior weeks, you learned about finance and financial analysis. This week, you will put it all together. Using your selected country, you will complete a comprehensive recommendation to Walmart executives either recommending or forgoing expansion into your selected country.
    In your paper,
    – Summarize the culture and financial climate of the country and why it would be favorable or unfavorable for Walmart to expand in that region.
    – Describe your country’s foreign exchange rates and how those rates could impact Walmart’s future financial performance. Be sure to address:
    – interest rates,
    – balance of payments,
    – government policies, and
    – other factors, such as taxes and tariffs.
    – Describe how Walmart needs to manage foreign exchange risk.
    – Analyze any potential political risk and its impact to the financials.
    – Propose how Walmart should fund this new expansion.
    The Walmart International Expansion Recommendation final paper:
    must be 10 to 12 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to  APA
    – must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    – title of paper in bold font
    – Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    – student’s name
    – name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    – course name and number
    – instructor’s name
    – due date
    – must utilize academic voice
    – must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
    –  must use at least 3 scholarly, peer-reviewed, or credible sources in addition to the course text
    –  must organize their content using APA Level Headings
    –  must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style

  • [Solved] tutor

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering tutor.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] FP Week 4 Discussion 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Case Study** Skeletal remains of a young white female were found in the basement of an abandoned housing complex. Initial anthropological examinations reveal multiple incised wounds (cut marks) on the dorsum of the metacarpals and phalanges. Please comment on the detected wounds and information we…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Case Study**
    Skeletal remains of a young white female were found in the basement of an abandoned housing complex. Initial anthropological examinations reveal multiple incised wounds (cut marks) on the dorsum of the metacarpals and phalanges. Please comment on the detected wounds and information we can obtain from such injuries.

  • [Solved] Child Victimization and Correctional Programs and Services

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    After looking over them and watching the video at the link below, do you think you have a maximalist or minimalist position on child victimization? How do the readings and/or video impact your position? On a final note, see the story link below the video link. About a decade ago, the U.S. Supreme Co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    After looking over them and watching the video at the link below, do you think you have a maximalist or minimalist position on child victimization? How do the readings and/or video impact your position? On a final note, see the story link below the video link. About a decade ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that courts do not have to require alleged child abuse victims to testify in order to convict someone. The history of this kind of issue is interesting – see links below on Maryland v. Craig (1990) and an Iowa Supreme Court ruling. With what you have studied so far in mind, what do you make of all this?
    Gendered and Attributions of Blame and Failure to Protect in Child Welfare Responses to Sexual Abuse: A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis By Corry Azzopardi
    3 paragraphs
    \_\_\_______________________________________________________________________
    The idea of requiring prisoners to pay for their food, board, medical care, and other services is controversial. Explore the arguments for and against this practice. Should prisoners be financially responsible for their incarceration costs, considering the potential for reducing the burden on taxpayers? Or does this approach further penalize individuals who are already marginalized and possibly unable to afford these costs? Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each perspective, including the impact on prisoners' rehabilitation, their families, and the overall goals of the correctional system. Be sure to include examples from the textbook in your answer.
    3 paragraphs
    Chapter 9 Correctional Programs and Services
    Siegel;, Larry.2018.Corrections Today.Boston, MA:Cengage

  • [Solved] DISCUSSION: PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **DISCUSSION: PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING** Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professional…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **DISCUSSION: PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING**
    Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professionals are increasingly involving patients in treatment decisions. However, this often comes with challenges, as illnesses and treatments can become complex.
    What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions?
    In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making.
    ### **RESOURCES**
    ![](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/icons/resources.svg)
    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/182069/modules/items/7502854 "Click this link to access the weekly resources (open in a new tab)")
    **To Prepare:**
    – Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
    – Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute's Decision Aids Inventory at [https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/Links to an external site.](https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/).
    – Choose "For Specific Conditions," then _Browse_  an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
    – After you have chosen a topic (or condition) and a decision aid, consider if [social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh) were considered in the treatment plan Social determinants of health can affect a patient's decision as these are conditions in the patient's environment, such as economic stability, education access, health care access and quality, neighborhood, and social and community context.
    – **NOTE:** To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please **DO NOT** use the patient's real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.
    ### **BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 11**
    **Post** a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences, [social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh), and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.
    ( **Please Note:** The underlined "social determinants of health" in the above content is meant to hotlink to the following Walden webpage and content:
    [Social Determinants of Health – Social Determinants of Health – Academic Guides at Walden Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh) University)
    **Respond** to at least **two** of your colleagues **on two different days** and offer alternative views on the impact of patient preferences on treatment plans or outcomes, or the potential impact of patient decision aids on situations like the one shared.
    \
    evimodule9EBSCO-FullText-10_21_2025.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evimodule9ebsco-fulltext-10-21-2025-pdf "evimodule9EBSCO-FullText-10_21_2025.pdf")
    \
    evimodule9JournalforNursesinProfessionalDevelopment.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evimodule9journalfornursesinprofessionaldevelopment-docx "evimodule9JournalforNursesinProfessionalDevelopment.docx")
    \
    evimodule9mat.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evimodule9mat-docx "evimodule9mat.docx")
    \
    evimodulerubrics.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/evimodulerubrics-docx "evimodulerubrics.docx")

  • [Solved] DNP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Q5.docx **## Q5.docx** **Module 2:** _Assignment 1_ Directions: Using the information from the two studies referenced in this week's lecture: 1. Identify the variables being measured in each survey and explain which measure of central tendency would be used to evaluate them. 2. Write the resu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Q5.docx

    **## Q5.docx**

    **Module 2:** _Assignment 1_

    Directions:

    Using the information from the two studies referenced in this week's lecture:

    1. Identify the variables being measured in each survey and explain which measure of central tendency would be used to evaluate them.

    2. Write the results for study I and extrapolate to the COVID19 vaccination information for the state of Florida.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Sunday.

    · It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    **Module 2:** _Displaying data_

    Data visualizations are the culmination of all data supposed to take long numeric lists and present them in an intuitive, easy-to-understand way. Different data types can be collected depending on the study type and the number of variables (Scott & Mazhindu, 2014). The two most common forms of data display are graphs and tables. Both aim to summarize and present the data in a manner that is easy to absorb and understand.

    Tables are visual displays composed of columns and rows in which numbers, text, or a combination thereof are presented.

    Parts of a table include:

    ·   Title number and title

    ·     Divider rules

    ·     Spanner heads

    ·     Stub heads

    ·     Column heads

    ·     Row titles

    ·     Cells

    ·     Footnotes

    Frequency distributions of numerical variables can be displayed in a table, a histogram chart, or a frequency polygon chart. For discrete variables, it is possible to present the number of observations according to the different values found in the study (Duquia et al., 2014).

    Frequency table: it is a table with two columns. One column lists the categories and another for the frequencies with which the items in the categories occur (number of items (count) fit into each category).

    Below are two examples with information from Table 2 from this week’s lecture, presented to summarize the data with descriptive statistics. In Table 3, we have a representation of the variable (score) in the row and the descriptive statistics that explain the different measures of central tendency for that variable: the mean, median, and mode, along with the standard deviation.

    **Table 3: Descriptive statistics with selected information from Table 2.**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | VARIABLE | MEAN | MEDIAN | MODE | STANDARD DEVIATION (SD) |
    | | | | | |
    | SCORE | 13.86667 | 14.5 | 12, 15, 16, 18 | 1.414214 |
    | | | | | |

    Table 4 also shows the variable in the first column and the different summarized information in terms of frequency and percentage for each value of the variable depression grade.

    **Table 4: Score classification frequency and percentage.**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | DEPRESSION GRADE | FREQUENCY(COUNT) | PERCENTAGE |
    | MILD | 2 | 14.3 |
    | MODERATE | 4 | 28.6 |
    | MODERATE SEVERE | 7 | 50.0 |
    | SEVERE | 1 | 7.1 |
    | TOTAL | 14 | 100.0 |

    We could also represent Table 4 information with a graph.

    A graph is another way to represent data. Graphs are used to display data because it is easier to see trends in the data when shown visually compared to when displayed numerically in a table. Complex data can often be displayed and interpreted more easily in a graph format than in a data table (Bartee et al., 2017).

    In a graph, the X-axis runs horizontally (side to side), and the Y-axis runs vertically (up and down). Typically, the independent variable will be shown on the X-axis, and the dependent variable will be shown on the Y-axis (Bartee et al., 2017).

    There are a variety of graph types. The main types you will see are frequency charts, histograms, bar charts, pie charts, scatter graphs, and line graphs.

    Bar charts: A bar graph is a graph that displays a bar for each category, with the length of each bar indicating the frequency of that category.

    A pie chart is a circle with wedges cut of varying sizes marked out like slices of pie or pizza. The wedges' relative sizes correspond to the categories' relative frequencies.

    How do You Choose an Appropriate Way of Displaying Data?

    To choose an appropriate graph, the first thing is to consider the objective of the presentation of data (Infogram, 2019):

    Comparison: Use comparison charts to compare one or more datasets. They can compare items or show differences over time.

    Relationship:  These types of charts are used to show a connection or correlation between two or more variables.

    Composition: For this kind of objective, the charts display parts of a whole that change over time.

    Distribution: The charts are used to show how variables are distributed over time, helping identify outliers and trends.

    Pyramids and pie charts display parts of a whole. Line, bar, and column charts represent change over time. While scatter plots and tree maps are helpful if you have a lot of data to visualize (Infogram, 2019).

    Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

    1. What are the ways statistics can be used to mislead?

    2. How to avoid being misled by poor statistics.

    Statistics have a lot of power. So much so that people and organizations based some of their most important decision on statistics. Statistics are extensively used in studies, organizations, media, and politics. People say numbers do not lie; that might be true. However, sometimes, statistics can be misleading, and the same data can show the opposite trend depending on how it is used. Most of the time, statistics are presented without the background information necessary for their correct interpretation. Knowing the different types of ways statistics can be misused is vital so that you can identify them and not make decisions based on biased or incorrect data (Wendy, 2021).

    · Statistics mislead

    · Statistics misrepresent research findings

    Statistics can generate misleading results for several reasons, such as poor research design, inappropriate sample size, or erroneous choice of statistical test, for example, can all generate misleading results. A group of issues should be known to assure a good interpretation of statistical data to avoid misleading statistical data. According to Scott & Mazhindu (2014), they are:

    ·
    **Measures of Central Tendency** To decide which measure of central tendency to use is linked to the type of data being collected and analyzed when a measure of central tendency is presented, it is also normal to include a measure of the variation. If an inappropriate measure of central tendency is used to describe a particular sample of data, the readers can be misled is if.

    ·
    **“Meaningless” Mean** An average (the mean, median, or mode of a set of numbers) is useful as a single-parameter characterization of a more or less quantitative variable type. For bi-modal distributions, an average has little descriptive value and obscures the number set's nature. For example, there would not be much value in calculating the average age of a family consisting of two parents and several children. Let us say the parents are aged 33 and 35, and the children are ages 1,3, 5, and 7. The average (mean) age in the family is 14, suggesting that the “average” family member is a teenager (Deriel, 2021).

    ·
    **Percentage and Proportion** Percentages are used to express proportions. This is especially important concerning sample size; that is why you should be wary when a percentage is quoted without an indication of the sample size.

    ·
    **Absolute and Relative Risk** These two statistics can be used to report risk, but they can have very different values even when the data they are based on is the same. Absolute refers to the actual probability that an event will occur. Relative risk, on the other hand, is a comparison of the risk experienced by one group compared to another.

    ·
    **Percentages, Proportions, Probability, and Ratios** Percentages, proportions, and ratios are related mathematical terms. However, the interesting question is whether or not they instinctively similarly interpreted each of these values. Proportion refers to the number of items in a sub-category about the total number of items in the main category, and percentages are used to express proportions.

    ·
    **Error of Measurement** Other issues related to statistics' misleading uses are extrapolation beyond the reasonable and extreme, sampling, and data display. When there are two groups to compare, the difference between the two groups is potentially small. You need to ensure that your measurement tool is accurate and that the error generated by the measuring tool does not swamp the difference between the two groups.

    How to Avoid Being Misled by Poor Statistics

    The following elements, according to (Spire et al., 1998 & Weatherburn, 2011), should be reviewed with care in the case of poor statistics:

    · The source is a subject matter expert, not a statistics expert.

    · The source is a statistician, not a subject matter expert.

    · The subject being studied is not well defined.

    · Data quality is poor.

    · The mainstream media has limited expertise and mixed motives.

    **References**

    Bhandari, P. (2020).
    _Descriptive statistics, definitions, types, examples_. Scribbr.
    [https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/descriptive-statistics/Links to an external site.](https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/descriptive-statistics/)

    CDC. (2022).
    _Prevaccination checklist for COVID-19 vaccines for vaccine recipients_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/pre-vaccination-screening-form.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/pre-vaccination-screening-form.pdf)

    Glen., S. (2021).
    _Odds ratio calculation and interpretation_. Statistics how to.
    [https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/probability-main-index/odds-ratio/Links to an external site.](https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/probability-main-index/odds-ratio/)

    Mcleod, S. (2018).
    _Questionnaire: definition, examples, design, and types_. Simplypsychology.org; Simply Psychology.
    [https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.htmlLinks to an external site.](https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.html)

    Scott, I., & Mazhindu, D. (2014).
    _Statistics for healthcare professionals: an introduction_. Sage.

    Spirer, H., Spirer, L., & Jaffe, A. J. (1998).
    _Misused statistics._ (2nd ed.).
    _CRC Press._

    Sun, Y., Fu, Z., Bo, Q., Mao, Z., Ma, X., & Wang, C. (2020). The reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in patients with major depressive disorder in a psychiatric hospital.
    _BMC Psychiatry_,
    _20_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02885-6Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02885-6)

    Weatherburn, D. (2011). Uses and abuses of crime statistics.
    _Crime and justice bulletin: Contemporary issues in crime and justice, NSW bureau of crime statistics and research_,
    _153_, 1 – 16.

    **## Q5.docx**

    **Module 2:** _Assignment 1_

    Directions:

    Using the information from the two studies referenced in this week's lecture:

    1. Identify the variables being measured in each survey and explain which measure of central tendency would be used to evaluate them.

    2. Write the results for study I and extrapolate to the COVID19 vaccination information for the state of Florida.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Sunday.

    · It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    **Module 2:** _Displaying data_

    Data visualizations are the culmination of all data supposed to take long numeric lists and present them in an intuitive, easy-to-understand way. Different data types can be collected depending on the study type and the number of variables (Scott & Mazhindu, 2014). The two most common forms of data display are graphs and tables. Both aim to summarize and present the data in a manner that is easy to absorb and understand.

    Tables are visual displays composed of columns and rows in which numbers, text, or a combination thereof are presented.

    Parts of a table include:

    ·   Title number and title

    ·     Divider rules

    ·     Spanner heads

    ·     Stub heads

    ·     Column heads

    ·     Row titles

    ·     Cells

    ·     Footnotes

    Frequency distributions of numerical variables can be displayed in a table, a histogram chart, or a frequency polygon chart. For discrete variables, it is possible to present the number of observations according to the different values found in the study (Duquia et al., 2014).

    Frequency table: it is a table with two columns. One column lists the categories and another for the frequencies with which the items in the categories occur (number of items (count) fit into each category).

    Below are two examples with information from Table 2 from this week’s lecture, presented to summarize the data with descriptive statistics. In Table 3, we have a representation of the variable (score) in the row and the descriptive statistics that explain the different measures of central tendency for that variable: the mean, median, and mode, along with the standard deviation.

    **Table 3: Descriptive statistics with selected information from Table 2.**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | VARIABLE | MEAN | MEDIAN | MODE | STANDARD DEVIATION (SD) |
    | | | | | |
    | SCORE | 13.86667 | 14.5 | 12, 15, 16, 18 | 1.414214 |
    | | | | | |

    Table 4 also shows the variable in the first column and the different summarized information in terms of frequency and percentage for each value of the variable depression grade.

    **Table 4: Score classification frequency and percentage.**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | DEPRESSION GRADE | FREQUENCY(COUNT) | PERCENTAGE |
    | MILD | 2 | 14.3 |
    | MODERATE | 4 | 28.6 |
    | MODERATE SEVERE | 7 | 50.0 |
    | SEVERE | 1 | 7.1 |
    | TOTAL | 14 | 100.0 |

    We could also represent Table 4 information with a graph.

    A graph is another way to represent data. Graphs are used to display data because it is easier to see trends in the data when shown visually compared to when displayed numerically in a table. Complex data can often be displayed and interpreted more easily in a graph format than in a data table (Bartee et al., 2017).

    In a graph, the X-axis runs horizontally (side to side), and the Y-axis runs vertically (up and down). Typically, the independent variable will be shown on the X-axis, and the dependent variable will be shown on the Y-axis (Bartee et al., 2017).

    There are a variety of graph types. The main types you will see are frequency charts, histograms, bar charts, pie charts, scatter graphs, and line graphs.

    Bar charts: A bar graph is a graph that displays a bar for each category, with the length of each bar indicating the frequency of that category.

    A pie chart is a circle with wedges cut of varying sizes marked out like slices of pie or pizza. The wedges' relative sizes correspond to the categories' relative frequencies.

    How do You Choose an Appropriate Way of Displaying Data?

    To choose an appropriate graph, the first thing is to consider the objective of the presentation of data (Infogram, 2019):

    Comparison: Use comparison charts to compare one or more datasets. They can compare items or show differences over time.

    Relationship:  These types of charts are used to show a connection or correlation between two or more variables.

    Composition: For this kind of objective, the charts display parts of a whole that change over time.

    Distribution: The charts are used to show how variables are distributed over time, helping identify outliers and trends.

    Pyramids and pie charts display parts of a whole. Line, bar, and column charts represent change over time. While scatter plots and tree maps are helpful if you have a lot of data to visualize (Infogram, 2019).

    Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

    1. What are the ways statistics can be used to mislead?

    2. How to avoid being misled by poor statistics.

    Statistics have a lot of power. So much so that people and organizations based some of their most important decision on statistics. Statistics are extensively used in studies, organizations, media, and politics. People say numbers do not lie; that might be true. However, sometimes, statistics can be misleading, and the same data can show the opposite trend depending on how it is used. Most of the time, statistics are presented without the background information necessary for their correct interpretation. Knowing the different types of ways statistics can be misused is vital so that you can identify them and not make decisions based on biased or incorrect data (Wendy, 2021).

    · Statistics mislead

    · Statistics misrepresent research findings

    Statistics can generate misleading results for several reasons, such as poor research design, inappropriate sample size, or erroneous choice of statistical test, for example, can all generate misleading results. A group of issues should be known to assure a good interpretation of statistical data to avoid misleading statistical data. According to Scott & Mazhindu (2014), they are:

    ·
    **Measures of Central Tendency** To decide which measure of central tendency to use is linked to the type of data being collected and analyzed when a measure of central tendency is presented, it is also normal to include a measure of the variation. If an inappropriate measure of central tendency is used to describe a particular sample of data, the readers can be misled is if.

    ·
    **“Meaningless” Mean** An average (the mean, median, or mode of a set of numbers) is useful as a single-parameter characterization of a more or less quantitative variable type. For bi-modal distributions, an average has little descriptive value and obscures the number set's nature. For example, there would not be much value in calculating the average age of a family consisting of two parents and several children. Let us say the parents are aged 33 and 35, and the children are ages 1,3, 5, and 7. The average (mean) age in the family is 14, suggesting that the “average” family member is a teenager (Deriel, 2021).

    ·
    **Percentage and Proportion** Percentages are used to express proportions. This is especially important concerning sample size; that is why you should be wary when a percentage is quoted without an indication of the sample size.

    ·
    **Absolute and Relative Risk** These two statistics can be used to report risk, but they can have very different values even when the data they are based on is the same. Absolute refers to the actual probability that an event will occur. Relative risk, on the other hand, is a comparison of the risk experienced by one group compared to another.

    ·
    **Percentages, Proportions, Probability, and Ratios** Percentages, proportions, and ratios are related mathematical terms. However, the interesting question is whether or not they instinctively similarly interpreted each of these values. Proportion refers to the number of items in a sub-category about the total number of items in the main category, and percentages are used to express proportions.

    ·
    **Error of Measurement** Other issues related to statistics' misleading uses are extrapolation beyond the reasonable and extreme, sampling, and data display. When there are two groups to compare, the difference between the two groups is potentially small. You need to ensure that your measurement tool is accurate and that the error generated by the measuring tool does not swamp the difference between the two groups.

    How to Avoid Being Misled by Poor Statistics

    The following elements, according to (Spire et al., 1998 & Weatherburn, 2011), should be reviewed with care in the case of poor statistics:

    · The source is a subject matter expert, not a statistics expert.

    · The source is a statistician, not a subject matter expert.

    · The subject being studied is not well defined.

    · Data quality is poor.

    · The mainstream media has limited expertise and mixed motives.

    **References**

    Bhandari, P. (2020).
    _Descriptive statistics, definitions, types, examples_. Scribbr.
    [https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/descriptive-statistics/Links to an external site.](https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/descriptive-statistics/)

    CDC. (2022).
    _Prevaccination checklist for COVID-19 vaccines for vaccine recipients_.
    [https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/pre-vaccination-screening-form.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/pre-vaccination-screening-form.pdf)

    Glen., S. (2021).
    _Odds ratio calculation and interpretation_. Statistics how to.
    [https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/probability-main-index/odds-ratio/Links to an external site.](https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/probability-main-index/odds-ratio/)

    Mcleod, S. (2018).
    _Questionnaire: definition, examples, design, and types_. Simplypsychology.org; Simply Psychology.
    [https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.htmlLinks to an external site.](https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.html)

    Scott, I., & Mazhindu, D. (2014).
    _Statistics for healthcare professionals: an introduction_. Sage.

    Spirer, H., Spirer, L., & Jaffe, A. J. (1998).
    _Misused statistics._ (2nd ed.).
    _CRC Press._

    Sun, Y., Fu, Z., Bo, Q., Mao, Z., Ma, X., & Wang, C. (2020). The reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in patients with major depressive disorder in a psychiatric hospital.
    _BMC Psychiatry_,
    _20_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02885-6Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02885-6)

    Weatherburn, D. (2011). Uses and abuses of crime statistics.
    _Crime and justice bulletin: Contemporary issues in crime and justice, NSW bureau of crime statistics and research_,
    _153_, 1 – 16.

  • [Solved] Motivation a driving force for goals achievement

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment for assignment reference and instruction. – ## MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf **## MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx** BMAL 703 **Motivation Theory Assignment Instructions** **Overview** Since motivation is a major d…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment for assignment reference and instruction.

    – ## MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf

    **## MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    BMAL 703

    **Motivation Theory Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Since motivation is a major determinate of a person’s persistence toward achieving a goal, it is important to examine how managers can use motivation to attain organizational goals. There are various theories to help managers understand how high performance can be effectively obtained from people.

    This assignment requires you to examine one of 3 motivational theories: these include Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. For this assignment you will select Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory to analyze in detail. Then, evaluate the effectiveness of your selected theory according to biblical principles. There should be a cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion and reference sections (which do not count towards the minimum word count).

    This paper must include the following 2 sections:

    1. Theory Analysis from Literature: Analyze one of the following motivation theories; Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. In your analysis, define the theory, describe its intended purpose and functions, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. (At least 100 words in each of these sections)

    2. Theory Evaluation from Scripture: Evaluate your chosen theory’s effectiveness according to biblical principles. Your biblical evaluation must include the following: A summary statement that explicitly states whether are not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature. (At least 100 words)

    **Required Headings**

    Cover page with Topic Title

    Abstract

    Theory Analysis from Literature

    Definition of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Purpose and Function of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Strengths of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Weaknesses of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature (at least 100 words in this section)

    Conclusions

    References

    **Other Requirements**

    Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course.

    · The cover page must include this statement: By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.

    · Submit all course assignments in MS Word. Do not submit in PDF or in any other word processing application.

    ·
    All references listed must be from peer-reviewed journal articles, except the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. This paper must include at least 5 references that have publication dates no older than 5 years, in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. Do not use any books other than the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. Do not cite the management text more than once in your paper. Do not cite or reference dissertations. They are not peer-reviewed articles. Do not conduct interviews.

    ·
    In-text citations are required to support your thesis statement, paragraph topic sentences points, statements, issues, arguments, concerns, statements of fact and opinion. Do not quote any words in the entire paper.

    · The required cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion, and reference sections are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.There is no maximum word count for any course assignments.

    · The abstract should be written within a range of 150-250 words. Your abstract should focus on key findings linked to management concepts in the assignment, but not on your specific research information. The abstract should be written as if it were a stand-alone document. Therefore, do not use phrases such as, “in this paper” which are more appropriate in the introduction section.

    · The introduction should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It presents a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the case. Your introduction must include a thesis statement, with a supporting citation at the end of your introduction section.

    · Each of these headings must be addressed in at least one full paragraph, with at least 100 words for each heading: Definition of the Theory, Purpose and Function of the Theory, Strengths of the Theory, Weaknesses of the Theory, Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature.

    · Your conclusion section should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It clearly states the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

    · Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, encyclopedia and Course Hero will not be accepted. Turnitin similarity scores should not exceed 20%.

    · Paragraph lengths: Each paragraph should have a topic sentence
    _unless_ it continues from or provides support to the prior paragraph. A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length.

    · Sentence lengths: Each sentence must not exceed 30 words.

    · The first and second person may not be used. This assignment must be based on peer reviewed and biblical/Christian literature.

    · Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, words with a double meaning, and language that is too informal and/or too subjective for example: “showcasing,” or “this paper aims to…”
    Use words that convey exact meaning.

    · Submit your document for grading with the following file name syntax: Last name, First name

    Remember: This assignment and all assignments in this course have a management, not leadership focus. There is a distinct difference between management and leadership. Discuss management, not leadership. The Contemporary Management text only provides basic topical information. As a research-intensive doctoral course, you will need to research current peer-reviewed literature. There is no assignment in this course that can be completed by relying on the text alone.

    **Grading Metrics**

    Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Define the
    Theory

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly defined the
    theory.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    defined the theory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    defined the theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Not Present

    5 pts

    Describe the
    Purpose and
    Function of the
    Theory

    10 to >5 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly described
    the purpose and
    function of the theory.

    5 to >2 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    2 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not describe the
    purpose and function of
    the theory.

    10 pts

    Discuss the
    Strengths and
    Weaknesses
    of the Theory

    25 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly discussed
    the strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    18 to >9 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    9 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not submit the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    25 pts

    Abstract 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly articulated a
    clear and
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content, linked to
    management with a
    focus on your findings.
    Key terms, and a
    biblical application are
    included.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    articulated some
    critical components
    of the paper, linked
    to management
    with a focus on
    your findings. Key
    terms and a
    biblical application
    are included.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    articulated critical
    components of the
    paper linked to
    management with
    a focus on your
    findings. Key
    terms and biblical
    application are not
    sufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not present
    concepts clearly. Did
    not provide a
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content. Missing a link
    to management. No
    focus on your findings.
    Missing key terms and
    a biblical application.

    5 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Introduction 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly presented a
    detailed description of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    assignment. A properly
    constructed thesis
    statement with
    supporting citation is at
    the end of your
    introduction section.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Conclusion 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly stated the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Provide a
    Summary
    Statement
    That Explicitly
    States if the
    Theory Is or Is
    Not Effective
    According to
    the Bible or
    Christian
    literature.

    15 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly provided a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states if
    the theory is or is not
    effective according to
    the Bible or Christian
    literature.

    9 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    3 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not provide a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states
    whether or not the
    theory is effective
    according to the Bible
    or Christian literature.

    15 pts

    Mechanics,
    Composition,
    & Word Count

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count is thorough.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    satisfactory.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    There are many errors
    in mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count.

    10 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    APA
    Formatting

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    APA formatting is
    thorough.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    APA formatting is
    satisfactory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    APA formatting is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    APA formatting does
    not exist.

    5 pts

    References 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    References meet
    requirements in number
    and quality.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    References almost
    meet requirements
    in number and
    quality.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    References do not
    meet
    requirements in
    number and
    quality.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Missing references.

    5 pts

    Citations 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Most statements are
    supported by citations.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Many statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Some statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Citations are rare,
    repetitious or
    non-existent.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    **## MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Define the
    Theory

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly defined the
    theory.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    defined the theory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    defined the theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Not Present

    5 pts

    Describe the
    Purpose and
    Function of the
    Theory

    10 to >5 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly described
    the purpose and
    function of the theory.

    5 to >2 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    2 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not describe the
    purpose and function of
    the theory.

    10 pts

    Discuss the
    Strengths and
    Weaknesses
    of the Theory

    25 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly discussed
    the strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    18 to >9 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    9 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not submit the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    25 pts

    Abstract 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly articulated a
    clear and
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content, linked to
    management with a
    focus on your findings.
    Key terms, and a
    biblical application are
    included.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    articulated some
    critical components
    of the paper, linked
    to management
    with a focus on
    your findings. Key
    terms and a
    biblical application
    are included.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    articulated critical
    components of the
    paper linked to
    management with
    a focus on your
    findings. Key
    terms and biblical
    application are not
    sufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not present
    concepts clearly. Did
    not provide a
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content. Missing a link
    to management. No
    focus on your findings.
    Missing key terms and
    a biblical application.

    5 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Introduction 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly presented a
    detailed description of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    assignment. A properly
    constructed thesis
    statement with
    supporting citation is at
    the end of your
    introduction section.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Conclusion 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly stated the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Provide a
    Summary
    Statement
    That Explicitly
    States if the
    Theory Is or Is
    Not Effective
    According to
    the Bible or
    Christian
    literature.

    15 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly provided a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states if
    the theory is or is not
    effective according to
    the Bible or Christian
    literature.

    9 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    3 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not provide a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states
    whether or not the
    theory is effective
    according to the Bible
    or Christian literature.

    15 pts

    Mechanics,
    Composition,
    & Word Count

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count is thorough.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    satisfactory.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    There are many errors
    in mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count.

    10 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    APA
    Formatting

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    APA formatting is
    thorough.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    APA formatting is
    satisfactory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    APA formatting is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    APA formatting does
    not exist.

    5 pts

    References 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    References meet
    requirements in number
    and quality.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    References almost
    meet requirements
    in number and
    quality.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    References do not
    meet
    requirements in
    number and
    quality.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Missing references.

    5 pts

    Citations 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Most statements are
    supported by citations.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Many statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Some statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Citations are rare,
    repetitious or
    non-existent.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    **## MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    BMAL 703

    **Motivation Theory Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Since motivation is a major determinate of a person’s persistence toward achieving a goal, it is important to examine how managers can use motivation to attain organizational goals. There are various theories to help managers understand how high performance can be effectively obtained from people.

    This assignment requires you to examine one of 3 motivational theories: these include Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. For this assignment you will select Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory to analyze in detail. Then, evaluate the effectiveness of your selected theory according to biblical principles. There should be a cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion and reference sections (which do not count towards the minimum word count).

    This paper must include the following 2 sections:

    1. Theory Analysis from Literature: Analyze one of the following motivation theories; Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. In your analysis, define the theory, describe its intended purpose and functions, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. (At least 100 words in each of these sections)

    2. Theory Evaluation from Scripture: Evaluate your chosen theory’s effectiveness according to biblical principles. Your biblical evaluation must include the following: A summary statement that explicitly states whether are not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature. (At least 100 words)

    **Required Headings**

    Cover page with Topic Title

    Abstract

    Theory Analysis from Literature

    Definition of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Purpose and Function of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Strengths of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Weaknesses of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature (at least 100 words in this section)

    Conclusions

    References

    **Other Requirements**

    Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course.

    · The cover page must include this statement: By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.

    · Submit all course assignments in MS Word. Do not submit in PDF or in any other word processing application.

    ·
    All references listed must be from peer-reviewed journal articles, except the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. This paper must include at least 5 references that have publication dates no older than 5 years, in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. Do not use any books other than the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. Do not cite the management text more than once in your paper. Do not cite or reference dissertations. They are not peer-reviewed articles. Do not conduct interviews.

    ·
    In-text citations are required to support your thesis statement, paragraph topic sentences points, statements, issues, arguments, concerns, statements of fact and opinion. Do not quote any words in the entire paper.

    · The required cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion, and reference sections are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.There is no maximum word count for any course assignments.

    · The abstract should be written within a range of 150-250 words. Your abstract should focus on key findings linked to management concepts in the assignment, but not on your specific research information. The abstract should be written as if it were a stand-alone document. Therefore, do not use phrases such as, “in this paper” which are more appropriate in the introduction section.

    · The introduction should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It presents a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the case. Your introduction must include a thesis statement, with a supporting citation at the end of your introduction section.

    · Each of these headings must be addressed in at least one full paragraph, with at least 100 words for each heading: Definition of the Theory, Purpose and Function of the Theory, Strengths of the Theory, Weaknesses of the Theory, Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature.

    · Your conclusion section should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It clearly states the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

    · Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, encyclopedia and Course Hero will not be accepted. Turnitin similarity scores should not exceed 20%.

    · Paragraph lengths: Each paragraph should have a topic sentence
    _unless_ it continues from or provides support to the prior paragraph. A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length.

    · Sentence lengths: Each sentence must not exceed 30 words.

    · The first and second person may not be used. This assignment must be based on peer reviewed and biblical/Christian literature.

    · Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, words with a double meaning, and language that is too informal and/or too subjective for example: “showcasing,” or “this paper aims to…”
    Use words that convey exact meaning.

    · Submit your document for grading with the following file name syntax: Last name, First name

    Remember: This assignment and all assignments in this course have a management, not leadership focus. There is a distinct difference between management and leadership. Discuss management, not leadership. The Contemporary Management text only provides basic topical information. As a research-intensive doctoral course, you will need to research current peer-reviewed literature. There is no assignment in this course that can be completed by relying on the text alone.

    **Grading Metrics**

    Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Define the
    Theory

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly defined the
    theory.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    defined the theory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    defined the theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Not Present

    5 pts

    Describe the
    Purpose and
    Function of the
    Theory

    10 to >5 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly described
    the purpose and
    function of the theory.

    5 to >2 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    2 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not describe the
    purpose and function of
    the theory.

    10 pts

    Discuss the
    Strengths and
    Weaknesses
    of the Theory

    25 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly discussed
    the strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    18 to >9 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    9 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not submit the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    25 pts

    Abstract 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly articulated a
    clear and
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content, linked to
    management with a
    focus on your findings.
    Key terms, and a
    biblical application are
    included.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    articulated some
    critical components
    of the paper, linked
    to management
    with a focus on
    your findings. Key
    terms and a
    biblical application
    are included.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    articulated critical
    components of the
    paper linked to
    management with
    a focus on your
    findings. Key
    terms and biblical
    application are not
    sufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not present
    concepts clearly. Did
    not provide a
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content. Missing a link
    to management. No
    focus on your findings.
    Missing key terms and
    a biblical application.

    5 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Introduction 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly presented a
    detailed description of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    assignment. A properly
    constructed thesis
    statement with
    supporting citation is at
    the end of your
    introduction section.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Conclusion 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly stated the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Provide a
    Summary
    Statement
    That Explicitly
    States if the
    Theory Is or Is
    Not Effective
    According to
    the Bible or
    Christian
    literature.

    15 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly provided a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states if
    the theory is or is not
    effective according to
    the Bible or Christian
    literature.

    9 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    3 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not provide a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states
    whether or not the
    theory is effective
    according to the Bible
    or Christian literature.

    15 pts

    Mechanics,
    Composition,
    & Word Count

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count is thorough.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    satisfactory.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    There are many errors
    in mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count.

    10 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    APA
    Formatting

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    APA formatting is
    thorough.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    APA formatting is
    satisfactory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    APA formatting is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    APA formatting does
    not exist.

    5 pts

    References 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    References meet
    requirements in number
    and quality.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    References almost
    meet requirements
    in number and
    quality.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    References do not
    meet
    requirements in
    number and
    quality.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Missing references.

    5 pts

    Citations 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Most statements are
    supported by citations.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Many statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Some statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Citations are rare,
    repetitious or
    non-existent.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    **## MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    BMAL 703

    **Motivation Theory Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Since motivation is a major determinate of a person’s persistence toward achieving a goal, it is important to examine how managers can use motivation to attain organizational goals. There are various theories to help managers understand how high performance can be effectively obtained from people.

    This assignment requires you to examine one of 3 motivational theories: these include Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. For this assignment you will select Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory to analyze in detail. Then, evaluate the effectiveness of your selected theory according to biblical principles. There should be a cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion and reference sections (which do not count towards the minimum word count).

    This paper must include the following 2 sections:

    1. Theory Analysis from Literature: Analyze one of the following motivation theories; Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. In your analysis, define the theory, describe its intended purpose and functions, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. (At least 100 words in each of these sections)

    2. Theory Evaluation from Scripture: Evaluate your chosen theory’s effectiveness according to biblical principles. Your biblical evaluation must include the following: A summary statement that explicitly states whether are not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature. (At least 100 words)

    **Required Headings**

    Cover page with Topic Title

    Abstract

    Theory Analysis from Literature

    Definition of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Purpose and Function of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Strengths of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Weaknesses of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)

    Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature (at least 100 words in this section)

    Conclusions

    References

    **Other Requirements**

    Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course.

    · The cover page must include this statement: By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.

    · Submit all course assignments in MS Word. Do not submit in PDF or in any other word processing application.

    ·
    All references listed must be from peer-reviewed journal articles, except the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. This paper must include at least 5 references that have publication dates no older than 5 years, in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. Do not use any books other than the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. Do not cite the management text more than once in your paper. Do not cite or reference dissertations. They are not peer-reviewed articles. Do not conduct interviews.

    ·
    In-text citations are required to support your thesis statement, paragraph topic sentences points, statements, issues, arguments, concerns, statements of fact and opinion. Do not quote any words in the entire paper.

    · The required cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion, and reference sections are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.There is no maximum word count for any course assignments.

    · The abstract should be written within a range of 150-250 words. Your abstract should focus on key findings linked to management concepts in the assignment, but not on your specific research information. The abstract should be written as if it were a stand-alone document. Therefore, do not use phrases such as, “in this paper” which are more appropriate in the introduction section.

    · The introduction should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It presents a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the case. Your introduction must include a thesis statement, with a supporting citation at the end of your introduction section.

    · Each of these headings must be addressed in at least one full paragraph, with at least 100 words for each heading: Definition of the Theory, Purpose and Function of the Theory, Strengths of the Theory, Weaknesses of the Theory, Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature.

    · Your conclusion section should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It clearly states the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

    · Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, encyclopedia and Course Hero will not be accepted. Turnitin similarity scores should not exceed 20%.

    · Paragraph lengths: Each paragraph should have a topic sentence
    _unless_ it continues from or provides support to the prior paragraph. A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length.

    · Sentence lengths: Each sentence must not exceed 30 words.

    · The first and second person may not be used. This assignment must be based on peer reviewed and biblical/Christian literature.

    · Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, words with a double meaning, and language that is too informal and/or too subjective for example: “showcasing,” or “this paper aims to…”
    Use words that convey exact meaning.

    · Submit your document for grading with the following file name syntax: Last name, First name

    Remember: This assignment and all assignments in this course have a management, not leadership focus. There is a distinct difference between management and leadership. Discuss management, not leadership. The Contemporary Management text only provides basic topical information. As a research-intensive doctoral course, you will need to research current peer-reviewed literature. There is no assignment in this course that can be completed by relying on the text alone.

    **Grading Metrics**

    Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Define the
    Theory

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly defined the
    theory.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    defined the theory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    defined the theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Not Present

    5 pts

    Describe the
    Purpose and
    Function of the
    Theory

    10 to >5 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly described
    the purpose and
    function of the theory.

    5 to >2 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    2 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    described the
    purpose and
    function of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not describe the
    purpose and function of
    the theory.

    10 pts

    Discuss the
    Strengths and
    Weaknesses
    of the Theory

    25 to >18 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly discussed
    the strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    18 to >9 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    9 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    discussed the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not submit the
    strengths and
    weaknesses of the
    theory.

    25 pts

    Abstract 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly articulated a
    clear and
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content, linked to
    management with a
    focus on your findings.
    Key terms, and a
    biblical application are
    included.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    articulated some
    critical components
    of the paper, linked
    to management
    with a focus on
    your findings. Key
    terms and a
    biblical application
    are included.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    articulated critical
    components of the
    paper linked to
    management with
    a focus on your
    findings. Key
    terms and biblical
    application are not
    sufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not present
    concepts clearly. Did
    not provide a
    comprehensive
    overview of the paper’s
    content. Missing a link
    to management. No
    focus on your findings.
    Missing key terms and
    a biblical application.

    5 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Introduction 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly presented a
    detailed description of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    assignment. A properly
    constructed thesis
    statement with
    supporting citation is at
    the end of your
    introduction section.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Conclusion 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly stated the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    stated the answer
    to the problem
    which you stated
    in your
    introduction.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not state the
    answer to the problem
    which you stated in
    your introduction.

    5 pts

    Provide a
    Summary
    Statement
    That Explicitly
    States if the
    Theory Is or Is
    Not Effective
    According to
    the Bible or
    Christian
    literature.

    15 to >9 pts

    Advanced

    Thoroughly provided a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states if
    the theory is or is not
    effective according to
    the Bible or Christian
    literature.

    9 to >3 pts

    Proficient

    Satisfactorily
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    3 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Insufficiently
    provided a
    summary
    statement that
    explicitly states if
    the theory is or is
    not effective
    according to the
    Bible or Christian
    literature.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Did not provide a
    summary statement
    that explicitly states
    whether or not the
    theory is effective
    according to the Bible
    or Christian literature.

    15 pts

    Mechanics,
    Composition,
    & Word Count

    10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count is thorough.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    satisfactory.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Mechanics,
    composition, and
    word count is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    There are many errors
    in mechanics,
    composition, and word
    count.

    10 pts

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Points

    APA
    Formatting

    5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    APA formatting is
    thorough.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    APA formatting is
    satisfactory.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    APA formatting is
    insufficient.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    APA formatting does
    not exist.

    5 pts

    References 5 to >3 pts

    Advanced

    References meet
    requirements in number
    and quality.

    3 to >1 pts

    Proficient

    References almost
    meet requirements
    in number and
    quality.

    1 to >0 pts

    Developing

    References do not
    meet
    requirements in
    number and
    quality.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Missing references.

    5 pts

    Citations 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Most statements are
    supported by citations.

    8 to >5 pts

    Proficient

    Many statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    5 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Some statements
    are supported by
    citations.

    0 pts

    Not Present

    Citations are rare,
    repetitious or
    non-existent.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Motivation Theory Grading Rubric

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Biostadistic

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Q6.docx **## Q6.docx** **Module 2:** _Assignment 2_ From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency. | | | | | — | — | — | | AGE | HIGH | WEIGHT | | 53 | 1.75 | 140 | | 56 | 1.6…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Q6.docx

    **## Q6.docx**

    **Module 2:** _Assignment 2_

    From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | AGE | HIGH | WEIGHT |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 140 |
    | 56 | 1.60 | 70 |
    | 62 | 1.84 | 86 |
    | 36 | 1.65 | 80 |
    | 39 | 1.69 | 65 |
    | 26 | 1.64 | 64 |
    | 58 | 1.70 | 78.5 |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 91 |
    | 34 | 1.66 | 82 |
    | 44 | 1.72 | 114 |
    | 49 | 1.70 | 98 |
    | 33 | 1.77 | 106 |
    | 37 | 1.63 | 81 |
    | 40 | 1.60 | 60 |

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Sunday.

    · It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    **## Q6.docx**

    **Module 2:** _Assignment 2_

    From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | AGE | HIGH | WEIGHT |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 140 |
    | 56 | 1.60 | 70 |
    | 62 | 1.84 | 86 |
    | 36 | 1.65 | 80 |
    | 39 | 1.69 | 65 |
    | 26 | 1.64 | 64 |
    | 58 | 1.70 | 78.5 |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 91 |
    | 34 | 1.66 | 82 |
    | 44 | 1.72 | 114 |
    | 49 | 1.70 | 98 |
    | 33 | 1.77 | 106 |
    | 37 | 1.63 | 81 |
    | 40 | 1.60 | 60 |

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Sunday.

    · It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

  • [Solved] Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.