Assignment Prompt & Instructions
see attachments
– a month ago
**files (2)**
– ## Help1Instructions.docx
– ## ANZJofFamilyTherapy-2014-Akinyela-NarrativeTherapyandCulturalDemocracyATestimonyView.pdf
**## Help1Instructions.docx**
Instructions: Compose a reaction paper to the attached. This reaction paper must consist of graduate level spelling, grammar, and style.
**This is a reaction paper, not a summary of what the author wrote but rather your analysis and critique of the presented topic.**
· Word document, typed in Times New Roman
· 12 point font
· Single spaced
· One inch margins
· Must be One-two pages in length
· APA 6th edition formatting using the following two references
· Attached article
· Smith-Acuna (2011) Systems Theory in Action: Applications to Individual, Couples, and Family Therapy.
100% NO PLAGIARISM or use of AI
**## ANZJofFamilyTherapy-2014-Akinyela-NarrativeTherapyandCulturalDemocracyATestimonyView.pdf**
Narrative Therapy and Cultural
Democracy: A Testimony View
Makungu M. Akinyela
Georgia State University, Atlanta
In this article I discuss my personal introduction to narrative therapy as an African American family therapist and
my discovery of the similarities between narrative practices and my own approaches to therapeutic work. I also
examine the cultural relationship between narrative therapy and the therapies of a growing number of communi-
ties outside of European dominant culture. The article questions the dominant approach to multiculturalism in the
field today and introduces the idea of cultural democracy as an alternative approach to managing the relationship
between narrative and other Euro-culture grounded therapies and the therapies of non-European peoples which
may be similar to, yet culturally unique from, Euro-cultural therapies. This difference is not superficial or inconse-
quential. The article argues that a cultural democracy view challenges the emotional/psychologically colonizing links
based in presumption of Euro-cultural superiority of the ideas of Europe over the rest of the therapeutic world.
This cultural democracy perspective creates a relationship of mutual respect and cross cultural influence between
narrative therapy and other Euro-cultural therapies and the therapies developed by non-European peoples.
Keywords: de-colonizing, cultural democracy, multi-culturalism, testimony therapy, narrative therapy
Key Points
1 Practitioners of discursive therapies agree that people’s lives are constituted through the stories we tell and
that stories are socially constructed. However, in addition to stories being socially constructed, how stories
are told is mediated through our unique ethnic cultures.
2 The cultural domination of the lives of the peoples of Africa, Asia, South America and the Pacific and
Atlantic islands requires a decolonization of the therapeutic lives of these peoples and decentering European
cultural norms and metaphors from therapeutic practices of non-European descendant peoples.
3 In recent years there has been a flowering of ideas and therapeutic practices derived from the cultural
knowledge of indigenous peoples which contributes to narrative practices.
4 The flowering of indigenous therapeutic practices and expression of self-agency in the field are examples of
a growing cultural democracy within the narrative and family therapy community being fostered by people
from these indigenous, non-European communities.
5 Cultural democracy moves practice beyond notions of multi-culturalism or the simple inclusion of non-Euro-
pean cultures and ideas into a Euro-cultural dominated field of practice. Cultural democracy provides room
for equally respected voices and cultural experiences to influence narrative and family therapy practice.
Narrative Therapy and Cultural Democracy: A Testimony View
I was first made aware of narrative therapy in 1996 when I met Canadian therapist
Stephen Madigan at a professional conference in Atlanta, Georgia, in the United
States. As I sat in Stephen’s workshop I became intrigued by his work and how famil-
Address for correspondence: Makungu M. Akinyela, Ph.D., LMFT, Associate Professor, Department
of African American Studies, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4109, Atlanta, GA 30302-4109,
USA. makinyela@gsu.edu
Makungu M. Akinyela is an associate professor and the Director of Undergraduate studies in the
African American Studies Department, at Georgia State University, Atlanta Georgia, as well as a
family therapist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2014, 35, 46–49
doi: 10.1002/anzf.1041
46 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
[http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28](http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28)
iar it seemed to my own approach to therapy. He focused on the importance of dis-
course and the social construction of ideas and the importance of privileging the cli-
ents experience in the therapeutic relationship. I was fascinated and eager to learn
more about this work that I witnessed and I was pleased to be invited by Stephen to
come to Toronto the next spring to attend a conference he hosted called Therapeutic
Conversations to present my own work.
At that conference I was introduced to Charles Waldegrave and Kiwi Tamasese
two therapists from Aotearoa/New Zealand who practiced their own brand of therapy,
Just therapy, which was very much derivative of the Maori, Samoan and Pakeha cul-
ture and history of New Zealand (Waldegrave, Tamasese, Tuhaka, & Campbell,
2003). These therapists insisted that I should plan to attend the Narrative Therapy
and Community Work conference in Adelaide, Australia, the following November. It
is at this conference that I first met Michael White, Cheryl White and David Den-
borough of the Dulwich Centre. This series of unexpected meetings across cultures,
histories and experiences was the beginning of a long and beneficial relationship and
dialogue between myself as a practitioner of Testimony therapy (Akinyela, 2008) and
my friends and colleagues who work through narrative approaches to therapy.
Since those early meetings, much of my writing and speaking on the subject has
focused on demonstrating both the similarities and differences between narrative and
testimony approaches to therapy and the reasons that this explication of sameness and
difference is so important.
At subsequent conferences and international gatherings I have continued to meet
and dialogue with colleagues from the international community. This has given me
the opportunity to discuss and share therapeutic experiences and the meaning of nar-
rative from various cultural contexts and understandings. What has become abun-
dantly clear for me is that while we all agree that people’s lives are indeed constituted
through the stories we tell, and that stories are socially constructed, how those stories
are told, how they are understood and the metaphors which define our stories are cul-
turally mediated. While socially constructed ideas can be shared across our many cul-
tures, they find their specific meanings for our various communities through the
particular lenses of the histories and cultures through which we are shaped.
While as a family therapist I have found that I have the greatest affinity with my
friends in the international field of narrative therapy and community work, I still find
it important to be clear that I am not a narrative therapist. I first began to articulate
my reasons for making this distinction in an article (Akinyela, 2002) in which I called
for de-colonizing the therapeutic lives of non-European peoples. In this article I
argued the need for decentering European cultural norms and metaphors from the
therapeutic practices of non-European peoples. This article was an early attempt to
articulate the need to create collective stories of cultural independence for the collec-
tive communities of indigenous descendants of Africa, Asia, North and South Amer-
ica and the Caribbean and Pacific Islands.
This article was never a call to disassociate our clinical practice from the ideas of
narrative and other progressive therapies, but it was a call for respect of the cultural
ideas and healing practices of non-European descendant peoples. This respect would
first need to begin among the people themselves, hence the call for decolonizing our
lives. Cultural hegemony has often created a sense of inferiority among peoples of col-
our about our own cultural practices and ideas and an inordinate sense of gratitude
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 47
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
and the overwhelming sense of superiority toward the therapeutic ideas and practices
that are grounded in European descendant cultures.
Since that article, however, I have become aware that ‘many flowers are blooming’
in the therapeutic garden. Around the world, indigenous therapists are asserting the
power of their own traditional ideas and meanings and applying them to therapeutic
practices. I believe that this is evidence of cultural democracy in practice. Far beyond
just multi-culturalism, which tends to be simply the inclusion of cultures and ideas
other than European ones into the arena created by Europeans, cultural democracy is
de-colonization in practice. As the peoples of Asia, Africa the Americas and the
Islands reclaim their own voices and speak their own special truths about therapy and
healing, we are finding that we have similar experiences, similar ideas and even similar
outcomes, which we can share with each other and with our Euro-descendant col-
leagues gladly. However, because we are now able to speak in our own voices and our
practices are mediated through our own traditional cultures, we also find that we are
able to offer healing methods to our own communities that are received as familiar
and authentic.
One of the most pressing issues facing our society today is the question of manag-
ing this increasingly culturally diverse society with equity and justice. In this paper I
posit that cultural democracy is the most appropriate expression of social justice in a
multi-cultural society. The United States of America is experiencing an explosion of
cultural diversity in its population. In light of this explosion, a key question becomes,
How do we maintain social justice in such a manner that the cultural expressions and
ideas of one community does not dominate and have privilege above all others? Ramiriz
and Castaneda (1974) write that:
Cultural democracy is a philosophical precept which recognizes that the way a person
communicates, relates to others, seeks support and recognition from his environment
(incentive motivation), and thinks and learns (cognition) is a product of the value sys-
tem of his [sic] home and community. Furthermore, educational environments or poli-
cies that do not recognize the individuals right, as guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, to remain identified with the culture and language of his cultural group are
culturally undemocratic (p. 23).
The above definition of cultural democracy is a good starting point. However Dar-
der (1991) argues that this definition must be refined to reflect the critical question
of power relationships in a multi-ethnic society, which includes a dominant cultural
group and culturally subordinate communities. Darder writes:
Although [Ram�ırez and Casta~neda’s definition] argues for changing the cultural realities
of classrooms, it fails to address critically the necessary shift in power relationships
required in [society] in order to involve bicultural [communities] in an active process
of empowerment, assist them in finding their voice, and support the development of a
spirit of social solidarity (p. 62).
Darder argues that culturally democratic practices must move beyond simple inclu-
sion of diverse cultures (multiculturalism) and must focus on the asymmetrical rela-
tionships of power that actually exist between oppressed communities and the larger
European culture dominated society.
I would argue that this need to move beyond inclusion is particularly important in
the therapeutic community. This means that a part of the work of narrative and other
discursive therapists and community workers is to recognise the imbalance of power
M. M. Akinyela
48 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
which is evident in the production of knowledge and approaches to therapeutic prac-
tices grounded primarily in Euro-cultured language and metaphors, which are then
imposed on non-European communities. This is why it is so significant that other
voices are being identified as world communities speak on behalf of their own healing
in their own cultural languages with their own cultural meanings.
I believe that this also means that the conversation as it develops should and will
be not only between narrative therapists of European descent, but also between thera-
pists of Africa, Asia, the Americas and the Islands, amongst and between ourselves
sharing our own knowledge and experiences with our indigenous healing practices.
As cultural democracy becomes the norm and the imbalance of cultural power is
corrected, it is likely that we will see another shift and growth in the family therapy
and narrative therapy fields, as new ideas and effective creative practices introduce use-
ful practices to the field.
References
Akinyela, M. M. (2002). De-colonizing our lives: Divining a postcolonial therapy. The Interna-
tional Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 1(2), 32–43.
Akinyela, M. (2008). Once they come: Testimony therapy and healing questions for African
American couples, in M. McGoldrick & K. Hardy (Eds.), Revisioning Family Therapy: Race,
Class, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice, (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Darder, A. (1991). Culture and Power in the Classroom: Foundations for Cultural Education.
Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey Publications.
Ramiriz, M., & Castaneda, A. (1974). Cultural Democracy, Bicognitive Development and Educa-
tion. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Waldegrave, C., Tamasese, K., Tuhaka, F., & Campbell, W. (2003). Just Therapy – A journey:
A collection of Papers from the Just Therapy team of New Zealand. Adelaide, South Australia:
Dulwich Centre Publications.
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 49
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
**## ANZJofFamilyTherapy-2014-Akinyela-NarrativeTherapyandCulturalDemocracyATestimonyView.pdf**
Narrative Therapy and Cultural
Democracy: A Testimony View
Makungu M. Akinyela
Georgia State University, Atlanta
In this article I discuss my personal introduction to narrative therapy as an African American family therapist and
my discovery of the similarities between narrative practices and my own approaches to therapeutic work. I also
examine the cultural relationship between narrative therapy and the therapies of a growing number of communi-
ties outside of European dominant culture. The article questions the dominant approach to multiculturalism in the
field today and introduces the idea of cultural democracy as an alternative approach to managing the relationship
between narrative and other Euro-culture grounded therapies and the therapies of non-European peoples which
may be similar to, yet culturally unique from, Euro-cultural therapies. This difference is not superficial or inconse-
quential. The article argues that a cultural democracy view challenges the emotional/psychologically colonizing links
based in presumption of Euro-cultural superiority of the ideas of Europe over the rest of the therapeutic world.
This cultural democracy perspective creates a relationship of mutual respect and cross cultural influence between
narrative therapy and other Euro-cultural therapies and the therapies developed by non-European peoples.
Keywords: de-colonizing, cultural democracy, multi-culturalism, testimony therapy, narrative therapy
Key Points
1 Practitioners of discursive therapies agree that people’s lives are constituted through the stories we tell and
that stories are socially constructed. However, in addition to stories being socially constructed, how stories
are told is mediated through our unique ethnic cultures.
2 The cultural domination of the lives of the peoples of Africa, Asia, South America and the Pacific and
Atlantic islands requires a decolonization of the therapeutic lives of these peoples and decentering European
cultural norms and metaphors from therapeutic practices of non-European descendant peoples.
3 In recent years there has been a flowering of ideas and therapeutic practices derived from the cultural
knowledge of indigenous peoples which contributes to narrative practices.
4 The flowering of indigenous therapeutic practices and expression of self-agency in the field are examples of
a growing cultural democracy within the narrative and family therapy community being fostered by people
from these indigenous, non-European communities.
5 Cultural democracy moves practice beyond notions of multi-culturalism or the simple inclusion of non-Euro-
pean cultures and ideas into a Euro-cultural dominated field of practice. Cultural democracy provides room
for equally respected voices and cultural experiences to influence narrative and family therapy practice.
Narrative Therapy and Cultural Democracy: A Testimony View
I was first made aware of narrative therapy in 1996 when I met Canadian therapist
Stephen Madigan at a professional conference in Atlanta, Georgia, in the United
States. As I sat in Stephen’s workshop I became intrigued by his work and how famil-
Address for correspondence: Makungu M. Akinyela, Ph.D., LMFT, Associate Professor, Department
of African American Studies, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4109, Atlanta, GA 30302-4109,
USA. makinyela@gsu.edu
Makungu M. Akinyela is an associate professor and the Director of Undergraduate studies in the
African American Studies Department, at Georgia State University, Atlanta Georgia, as well as a
family therapist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2014, 35, 46–49
doi: 10.1002/anzf.1041
46 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
[http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28](http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28)
iar it seemed to my own approach to therapy. He focused on the importance of dis-
course and the social construction of ideas and the importance of privileging the cli-
ents experience in the therapeutic relationship. I was fascinated and eager to learn
more about this work that I witnessed and I was pleased to be invited by Stephen to
come to Toronto the next spring to attend a conference he hosted called Therapeutic
Conversations to present my own work.
At that conference I was introduced to Charles Waldegrave and Kiwi Tamasese
two therapists from Aotearoa/New Zealand who practiced their own brand of therapy,
Just therapy, which was very much derivative of the Maori, Samoan and Pakeha cul-
ture and history of New Zealand (Waldegrave, Tamasese, Tuhaka, & Campbell,
2003). These therapists insisted that I should plan to attend the Narrative Therapy
and Community Work conference in Adelaide, Australia, the following November. It
is at this conference that I first met Michael White, Cheryl White and David Den-
borough of the Dulwich Centre. This series of unexpected meetings across cultures,
histories and experiences was the beginning of a long and beneficial relationship and
dialogue between myself as a practitioner of Testimony therapy (Akinyela, 2008) and
my friends and colleagues who work through narrative approaches to therapy.
Since those early meetings, much of my writing and speaking on the subject has
focused on demonstrating both the similarities and differences between narrative and
testimony approaches to therapy and the reasons that this explication of sameness and
difference is so important.
At subsequent conferences and international gatherings I have continued to meet
and dialogue with colleagues from the international community. This has given me
the opportunity to discuss and share therapeutic experiences and the meaning of nar-
rative from various cultural contexts and understandings. What has become abun-
dantly clear for me is that while we all agree that people’s lives are indeed constituted
through the stories we tell, and that stories are socially constructed, how those stories
are told, how they are understood and the metaphors which define our stories are cul-
turally mediated. While socially constructed ideas can be shared across our many cul-
tures, they find their specific meanings for our various communities through the
particular lenses of the histories and cultures through which we are shaped.
While as a family therapist I have found that I have the greatest affinity with my
friends in the international field of narrative therapy and community work, I still find
it important to be clear that I am not a narrative therapist. I first began to articulate
my reasons for making this distinction in an article (Akinyela, 2002) in which I called
for de-colonizing the therapeutic lives of non-European peoples. In this article I
argued the need for decentering European cultural norms and metaphors from the
therapeutic practices of non-European peoples. This article was an early attempt to
articulate the need to create collective stories of cultural independence for the collec-
tive communities of indigenous descendants of Africa, Asia, North and South Amer-
ica and the Caribbean and Pacific Islands.
This article was never a call to disassociate our clinical practice from the ideas of
narrative and other progressive therapies, but it was a call for respect of the cultural
ideas and healing practices of non-European descendant peoples. This respect would
first need to begin among the people themselves, hence the call for decolonizing our
lives. Cultural hegemony has often created a sense of inferiority among peoples of col-
our about our own cultural practices and ideas and an inordinate sense of gratitude
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 47
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
and the overwhelming sense of superiority toward the therapeutic ideas and practices
that are grounded in European descendant cultures.
Since that article, however, I have become aware that ‘many flowers are blooming’
in the therapeutic garden. Around the world, indigenous therapists are asserting the
power of their own traditional ideas and meanings and applying them to therapeutic
practices. I believe that this is evidence of cultural democracy in practice. Far beyond
just multi-culturalism, which tends to be simply the inclusion of cultures and ideas
other than European ones into the arena created by Europeans, cultural democracy is
de-colonization in practice. As the peoples of Asia, Africa the Americas and the
Islands reclaim their own voices and speak their own special truths about therapy and
healing, we are finding that we have similar experiences, similar ideas and even similar
outcomes, which we can share with each other and with our Euro-descendant col-
leagues gladly. However, because we are now able to speak in our own voices and our
practices are mediated through our own traditional cultures, we also find that we are
able to offer healing methods to our own communities that are received as familiar
and authentic.
One of the most pressing issues facing our society today is the question of manag-
ing this increasingly culturally diverse society with equity and justice. In this paper I
posit that cultural democracy is the most appropriate expression of social justice in a
multi-cultural society. The United States of America is experiencing an explosion of
cultural diversity in its population. In light of this explosion, a key question becomes,
How do we maintain social justice in such a manner that the cultural expressions and
ideas of one community does not dominate and have privilege above all others? Ramiriz
and Castaneda (1974) write that:
Cultural democracy is a philosophical precept which recognizes that the way a person
communicates, relates to others, seeks support and recognition from his environment
(incentive motivation), and thinks and learns (cognition) is a product of the value sys-
tem of his [sic] home and community. Furthermore, educational environments or poli-
cies that do not recognize the individuals right, as guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, to remain identified with the culture and language of his cultural group are
culturally undemocratic (p. 23).
The above definition of cultural democracy is a good starting point. However Dar-
der (1991) argues that this definition must be refined to reflect the critical question
of power relationships in a multi-ethnic society, which includes a dominant cultural
group and culturally subordinate communities. Darder writes:
Although [Ram�ırez and Casta~neda’s definition] argues for changing the cultural realities
of classrooms, it fails to address critically the necessary shift in power relationships
required in [society] in order to involve bicultural [communities] in an active process
of empowerment, assist them in finding their voice, and support the development of a
spirit of social solidarity (p. 62).
Darder argues that culturally democratic practices must move beyond simple inclu-
sion of diverse cultures (multiculturalism) and must focus on the asymmetrical rela-
tionships of power that actually exist between oppressed communities and the larger
European culture dominated society.
I would argue that this need to move beyond inclusion is particularly important in
the therapeutic community. This means that a part of the work of narrative and other
discursive therapists and community workers is to recognise the imbalance of power
M. M. Akinyela
48 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
which is evident in the production of knowledge and approaches to therapeutic prac-
tices grounded primarily in Euro-cultured language and metaphors, which are then
imposed on non-European communities. This is why it is so significant that other
voices are being identified as world communities speak on behalf of their own healing
in their own cultural languages with their own cultural meanings.
I believe that this also means that the conversation as it develops should and will
be not only between narrative therapists of European descent, but also between thera-
pists of Africa, Asia, the Americas and the Islands, amongst and between ourselves
sharing our own knowledge and experiences with our indigenous healing practices.
As cultural democracy becomes the norm and the imbalance of cultural power is
corrected, it is likely that we will see another shift and growth in the family therapy
and narrative therapy fields, as new ideas and effective creative practices introduce use-
ful practices to the field.
References
Akinyela, M. M. (2002). De-colonizing our lives: Divining a postcolonial therapy. The Interna-
tional Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 1(2), 32–43.
Akinyela, M. (2008). Once they come: Testimony therapy and healing questions for African
American couples, in M. McGoldrick & K. Hardy (Eds.), Revisioning Family Therapy: Race,
Class, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice, (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Darder, A. (1991). Culture and Power in the Classroom: Foundations for Cultural Education.
Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey Publications.
Ramiriz, M., & Castaneda, A. (1974). Cultural Democracy, Bicognitive Development and Educa-
tion. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Waldegrave, C., Tamasese, K., Tuhaka, F., & Campbell, W. (2003). Just Therapy – A journey:
A collection of Papers from the Just Therapy team of New Zealand. Adelaide, South Australia:
Dulwich Centre Publications.
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 49
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
**## Help1Instructions.docx**
Instructions: Compose a reaction paper to the attached. This reaction paper must consist of graduate level spelling, grammar, and style.
**This is a reaction paper, not a summary of what the author wrote but rather your analysis and critique of the presented topic.**
· Word document, typed in Times New Roman
· 12 point font
· Single spaced
· One inch margins
· Must be One-two pages in length
· APA 6th edition formatting using the following two references
· Attached article
· Smith-Acuna (2011) Systems Theory in Action: Applications to Individual, Couples, and Family Therapy.
100% NO PLAGIARISM or use of AI
**## ANZJofFamilyTherapy-2014-Akinyela-NarrativeTherapyandCulturalDemocracyATestimonyView.pdf**
Narrative Therapy and Cultural
Democracy: A Testimony View
Makungu M. Akinyela
Georgia State University, Atlanta
In this article I discuss my personal introduction to narrative therapy as an African American family therapist and
my discovery of the similarities between narrative practices and my own approaches to therapeutic work. I also
examine the cultural relationship between narrative therapy and the therapies of a growing number of communi-
ties outside of European dominant culture. The article questions the dominant approach to multiculturalism in the
field today and introduces the idea of cultural democracy as an alternative approach to managing the relationship
between narrative and other Euro-culture grounded therapies and the therapies of non-European peoples which
may be similar to, yet culturally unique from, Euro-cultural therapies. This difference is not superficial or inconse-
quential. The article argues that a cultural democracy view challenges the emotional/psychologically colonizing links
based in presumption of Euro-cultural superiority of the ideas of Europe over the rest of the therapeutic world.
This cultural democracy perspective creates a relationship of mutual respect and cross cultural influence between
narrative therapy and other Euro-cultural therapies and the therapies developed by non-European peoples.
Keywords: de-colonizing, cultural democracy, multi-culturalism, testimony therapy, narrative therapy
Key Points
1 Practitioners of discursive therapies agree that people’s lives are constituted through the stories we tell and
that stories are socially constructed. However, in addition to stories being socially constructed, how stories
are told is mediated through our unique ethnic cultures.
2 The cultural domination of the lives of the peoples of Africa, Asia, South America and the Pacific and
Atlantic islands requires a decolonization of the therapeutic lives of these peoples and decentering European
cultural norms and metaphors from therapeutic practices of non-European descendant peoples.
3 In recent years there has been a flowering of ideas and therapeutic practices derived from the cultural
knowledge of indigenous peoples which contributes to narrative practices.
4 The flowering of indigenous therapeutic practices and expression of self-agency in the field are examples of
a growing cultural democracy within the narrative and family therapy community being fostered by people
from these indigenous, non-European communities.
5 Cultural democracy moves practice beyond notions of multi-culturalism or the simple inclusion of non-Euro-
pean cultures and ideas into a Euro-cultural dominated field of practice. Cultural democracy provides room
for equally respected voices and cultural experiences to influence narrative and family therapy practice.
Narrative Therapy and Cultural Democracy: A Testimony View
I was first made aware of narrative therapy in 1996 when I met Canadian therapist
Stephen Madigan at a professional conference in Atlanta, Georgia, in the United
States. As I sat in Stephen’s workshop I became intrigued by his work and how famil-
Address for correspondence: Makungu M. Akinyela, Ph.D., LMFT, Associate Professor, Department
of African American Studies, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4109, Atlanta, GA 30302-4109,
USA. makinyela@gsu.edu
Makungu M. Akinyela is an associate professor and the Director of Undergraduate studies in the
African American Studies Department, at Georgia State University, Atlanta Georgia, as well as a
family therapist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2014, 35, 46–49
doi: 10.1002/anzf.1041
46 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
[http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28](http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28)
iar it seemed to my own approach to therapy. He focused on the importance of dis-
course and the social construction of ideas and the importance of privileging the cli-
ents experience in the therapeutic relationship. I was fascinated and eager to learn
more about this work that I witnessed and I was pleased to be invited by Stephen to
come to Toronto the next spring to attend a conference he hosted called Therapeutic
Conversations to present my own work.
At that conference I was introduced to Charles Waldegrave and Kiwi Tamasese
two therapists from Aotearoa/New Zealand who practiced their own brand of therapy,
Just therapy, which was very much derivative of the Maori, Samoan and Pakeha cul-
ture and history of New Zealand (Waldegrave, Tamasese, Tuhaka, & Campbell,
2003). These therapists insisted that I should plan to attend the Narrative Therapy
and Community Work conference in Adelaide, Australia, the following November. It
is at this conference that I first met Michael White, Cheryl White and David Den-
borough of the Dulwich Centre. This series of unexpected meetings across cultures,
histories and experiences was the beginning of a long and beneficial relationship and
dialogue between myself as a practitioner of Testimony therapy (Akinyela, 2008) and
my friends and colleagues who work through narrative approaches to therapy.
Since those early meetings, much of my writing and speaking on the subject has
focused on demonstrating both the similarities and differences between narrative and
testimony approaches to therapy and the reasons that this explication of sameness and
difference is so important.
At subsequent conferences and international gatherings I have continued to meet
and dialogue with colleagues from the international community. This has given me
the opportunity to discuss and share therapeutic experiences and the meaning of nar-
rative from various cultural contexts and understandings. What has become abun-
dantly clear for me is that while we all agree that people’s lives are indeed constituted
through the stories we tell, and that stories are socially constructed, how those stories
are told, how they are understood and the metaphors which define our stories are cul-
turally mediated. While socially constructed ideas can be shared across our many cul-
tures, they find their specific meanings for our various communities through the
particular lenses of the histories and cultures through which we are shaped.
While as a family therapist I have found that I have the greatest affinity with my
friends in the international field of narrative therapy and community work, I still find
it important to be clear that I am not a narrative therapist. I first began to articulate
my reasons for making this distinction in an article (Akinyela, 2002) in which I called
for de-colonizing the therapeutic lives of non-European peoples. In this article I
argued the need for decentering European cultural norms and metaphors from the
therapeutic practices of non-European peoples. This article was an early attempt to
articulate the need to create collective stories of cultural independence for the collec-
tive communities of indigenous descendants of Africa, Asia, North and South Amer-
ica and the Caribbean and Pacific Islands.
This article was never a call to disassociate our clinical practice from the ideas of
narrative and other progressive therapies, but it was a call for respect of the cultural
ideas and healing practices of non-European descendant peoples. This respect would
first need to begin among the people themselves, hence the call for decolonizing our
lives. Cultural hegemony has often created a sense of inferiority among peoples of col-
our about our own cultural practices and ideas and an inordinate sense of gratitude
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 47
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
and the overwhelming sense of superiority toward the therapeutic ideas and practices
that are grounded in European descendant cultures.
Since that article, however, I have become aware that ‘many flowers are blooming’
in the therapeutic garden. Around the world, indigenous therapists are asserting the
power of their own traditional ideas and meanings and applying them to therapeutic
practices. I believe that this is evidence of cultural democracy in practice. Far beyond
just multi-culturalism, which tends to be simply the inclusion of cultures and ideas
other than European ones into the arena created by Europeans, cultural democracy is
de-colonization in practice. As the peoples of Asia, Africa the Americas and the
Islands reclaim their own voices and speak their own special truths about therapy and
healing, we are finding that we have similar experiences, similar ideas and even similar
outcomes, which we can share with each other and with our Euro-descendant col-
leagues gladly. However, because we are now able to speak in our own voices and our
practices are mediated through our own traditional cultures, we also find that we are
able to offer healing methods to our own communities that are received as familiar
and authentic.
One of the most pressing issues facing our society today is the question of manag-
ing this increasingly culturally diverse society with equity and justice. In this paper I
posit that cultural democracy is the most appropriate expression of social justice in a
multi-cultural society. The United States of America is experiencing an explosion of
cultural diversity in its population. In light of this explosion, a key question becomes,
How do we maintain social justice in such a manner that the cultural expressions and
ideas of one community does not dominate and have privilege above all others? Ramiriz
and Castaneda (1974) write that:
Cultural democracy is a philosophical precept which recognizes that the way a person
communicates, relates to others, seeks support and recognition from his environment
(incentive motivation), and thinks and learns (cognition) is a product of the value sys-
tem of his [sic] home and community. Furthermore, educational environments or poli-
cies that do not recognize the individuals right, as guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, to remain identified with the culture and language of his cultural group are
culturally undemocratic (p. 23).
The above definition of cultural democracy is a good starting point. However Dar-
der (1991) argues that this definition must be refined to reflect the critical question
of power relationships in a multi-ethnic society, which includes a dominant cultural
group and culturally subordinate communities. Darder writes:
Although [Ram�ırez and Casta~neda’s definition] argues for changing the cultural realities
of classrooms, it fails to address critically the necessary shift in power relationships
required in [society] in order to involve bicultural [communities] in an active process
of empowerment, assist them in finding their voice, and support the development of a
spirit of social solidarity (p. 62).
Darder argues that culturally democratic practices must move beyond simple inclu-
sion of diverse cultures (multiculturalism) and must focus on the asymmetrical rela-
tionships of power that actually exist between oppressed communities and the larger
European culture dominated society.
I would argue that this need to move beyond inclusion is particularly important in
the therapeutic community. This means that a part of the work of narrative and other
discursive therapists and community workers is to recognise the imbalance of power
M. M. Akinyela
48 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
which is evident in the production of knowledge and approaches to therapeutic prac-
tices grounded primarily in Euro-cultured language and metaphors, which are then
imposed on non-European communities. This is why it is so significant that other
voices are being identified as world communities speak on behalf of their own healing
in their own cultural languages with their own cultural meanings.
I believe that this also means that the conversation as it develops should and will
be not only between narrative therapists of European descent, but also between thera-
pists of Africa, Asia, the Americas and the Islands, amongst and between ourselves
sharing our own knowledge and experiences with our indigenous healing practices.
As cultural democracy becomes the norm and the imbalance of cultural power is
corrected, it is likely that we will see another shift and growth in the family therapy
and narrative therapy fields, as new ideas and effective creative practices introduce use-
ful practices to the field.
References
Akinyela, M. M. (2002). De-colonizing our lives: Divining a postcolonial therapy. The Interna-
tional Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 1(2), 32–43.
Akinyela, M. (2008). Once they come: Testimony therapy and healing questions for African
American couples, in M. McGoldrick & K. Hardy (Eds.), Revisioning Family Therapy: Race,
Class, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice, (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Darder, A. (1991). Culture and Power in the Classroom: Foundations for Cultural Education.
Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey Publications.
Ramiriz, M., & Castaneda, A. (1974). Cultural Democracy, Bicognitive Development and Educa-
tion. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Waldegrave, C., Tamasese, K., Tuhaka, F., & Campbell, W. (2003). Just Therapy – A journey:
A collection of Papers from the Just Therapy team of New Zealand. Adelaide, South Australia:
Dulwich Centre Publications.
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 49
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
**## Help1Instructions.docx**
Instructions: Compose a reaction paper to the attached. This reaction paper must consist of graduate level spelling, grammar, and style.
**This is a reaction paper, not a summary of what the author wrote but rather your analysis and critique of the presented topic.**
· Word document, typed in Times New Roman
· 12 point font
· Single spaced
· One inch margins
· Must be One-two pages in length
· APA 6th edition formatting using the following two references
· Attached article
· Smith-Acuna (2011) Systems Theory in Action: Applications to Individual, Couples, and Family Therapy.
100% NO PLAGIARISM or use of AI
**## ANZJofFamilyTherapy-2014-Akinyela-NarrativeTherapyandCulturalDemocracyATestimonyView.pdf**
Narrative Therapy and Cultural
Democracy: A Testimony View
Makungu M. Akinyela
Georgia State University, Atlanta
In this article I discuss my personal introduction to narrative therapy as an African American family therapist and
my discovery of the similarities between narrative practices and my own approaches to therapeutic work. I also
examine the cultural relationship between narrative therapy and the therapies of a growing number of communi-
ties outside of European dominant culture. The article questions the dominant approach to multiculturalism in the
field today and introduces the idea of cultural democracy as an alternative approach to managing the relationship
between narrative and other Euro-culture grounded therapies and the therapies of non-European peoples which
may be similar to, yet culturally unique from, Euro-cultural therapies. This difference is not superficial or inconse-
quential. The article argues that a cultural democracy view challenges the emotional/psychologically colonizing links
based in presumption of Euro-cultural superiority of the ideas of Europe over the rest of the therapeutic world.
This cultural democracy perspective creates a relationship of mutual respect and cross cultural influence between
narrative therapy and other Euro-cultural therapies and the therapies developed by non-European peoples.
Keywords: de-colonizing, cultural democracy, multi-culturalism, testimony therapy, narrative therapy
Key Points
1 Practitioners of discursive therapies agree that people’s lives are constituted through the stories we tell and
that stories are socially constructed. However, in addition to stories being socially constructed, how stories
are told is mediated through our unique ethnic cultures.
2 The cultural domination of the lives of the peoples of Africa, Asia, South America and the Pacific and
Atlantic islands requires a decolonization of the therapeutic lives of these peoples and decentering European
cultural norms and metaphors from therapeutic practices of non-European descendant peoples.
3 In recent years there has been a flowering of ideas and therapeutic practices derived from the cultural
knowledge of indigenous peoples which contributes to narrative practices.
4 The flowering of indigenous therapeutic practices and expression of self-agency in the field are examples of
a growing cultural democracy within the narrative and family therapy community being fostered by people
from these indigenous, non-European communities.
5 Cultural democracy moves practice beyond notions of multi-culturalism or the simple inclusion of non-Euro-
pean cultures and ideas into a Euro-cultural dominated field of practice. Cultural democracy provides room
for equally respected voices and cultural experiences to influence narrative and family therapy practice.
Narrative Therapy and Cultural Democracy: A Testimony View
I was first made aware of narrative therapy in 1996 when I met Canadian therapist
Stephen Madigan at a professional conference in Atlanta, Georgia, in the United
States. As I sat in Stephen’s workshop I became intrigued by his work and how famil-
Address for correspondence: Makungu M. Akinyela, Ph.D., LMFT, Associate Professor, Department
of African American Studies, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4109, Atlanta, GA 30302-4109,
USA. makinyela@gsu.edu
Makungu M. Akinyela is an associate professor and the Director of Undergraduate studies in the
African American Studies Department, at Georgia State University, Atlanta Georgia, as well as a
family therapist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2014, 35, 46–49
doi: 10.1002/anzf.1041
46 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
[http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28](http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1002%2Fanzf.1041&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-04-28)
iar it seemed to my own approach to therapy. He focused on the importance of dis-
course and the social construction of ideas and the importance of privileging the cli-
ents experience in the therapeutic relationship. I was fascinated and eager to learn
more about this work that I witnessed and I was pleased to be invited by Stephen to
come to Toronto the next spring to attend a conference he hosted called Therapeutic
Conversations to present my own work.
At that conference I was introduced to Charles Waldegrave and Kiwi Tamasese
two therapists from Aotearoa/New Zealand who practiced their own brand of therapy,
Just therapy, which was very much derivative of the Maori, Samoan and Pakeha cul-
ture and history of New Zealand (Waldegrave, Tamasese, Tuhaka, & Campbell,
2003). These therapists insisted that I should plan to attend the Narrative Therapy
and Community Work conference in Adelaide, Australia, the following November. It
is at this conference that I first met Michael White, Cheryl White and David Den-
borough of the Dulwich Centre. This series of unexpected meetings across cultures,
histories and experiences was the beginning of a long and beneficial relationship and
dialogue between myself as a practitioner of Testimony therapy (Akinyela, 2008) and
my friends and colleagues who work through narrative approaches to therapy.
Since those early meetings, much of my writing and speaking on the subject has
focused on demonstrating both the similarities and differences between narrative and
testimony approaches to therapy and the reasons that this explication of sameness and
difference is so important.
At subsequent conferences and international gatherings I have continued to meet
and dialogue with colleagues from the international community. This has given me
the opportunity to discuss and share therapeutic experiences and the meaning of nar-
rative from various cultural contexts and understandings. What has become abun-
dantly clear for me is that while we all agree that people’s lives are indeed constituted
through the stories we tell, and that stories are socially constructed, how those stories
are told, how they are understood and the metaphors which define our stories are cul-
turally mediated. While socially constructed ideas can be shared across our many cul-
tures, they find their specific meanings for our various communities through the
particular lenses of the histories and cultures through which we are shaped.
While as a family therapist I have found that I have the greatest affinity with my
friends in the international field of narrative therapy and community work, I still find
it important to be clear that I am not a narrative therapist. I first began to articulate
my reasons for making this distinction in an article (Akinyela, 2002) in which I called
for de-colonizing the therapeutic lives of non-European peoples. In this article I
argued the need for decentering European cultural norms and metaphors from the
therapeutic practices of non-European peoples. This article was an early attempt to
articulate the need to create collective stories of cultural independence for the collec-
tive communities of indigenous descendants of Africa, Asia, North and South Amer-
ica and the Caribbean and Pacific Islands.
This article was never a call to disassociate our clinical practice from the ideas of
narrative and other progressive therapies, but it was a call for respect of the cultural
ideas and healing practices of non-European descendant peoples. This respect would
first need to begin among the people themselves, hence the call for decolonizing our
lives. Cultural hegemony has often created a sense of inferiority among peoples of col-
our about our own cultural practices and ideas and an inordinate sense of gratitude
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 47
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
and the overwhelming sense of superiority toward the therapeutic ideas and practices
that are grounded in European descendant cultures.
Since that article, however, I have become aware that ‘many flowers are blooming’
in the therapeutic garden. Around the world, indigenous therapists are asserting the
power of their own traditional ideas and meanings and applying them to therapeutic
practices. I believe that this is evidence of cultural democracy in practice. Far beyond
just multi-culturalism, which tends to be simply the inclusion of cultures and ideas
other than European ones into the arena created by Europeans, cultural democracy is
de-colonization in practice. As the peoples of Asia, Africa the Americas and the
Islands reclaim their own voices and speak their own special truths about therapy and
healing, we are finding that we have similar experiences, similar ideas and even similar
outcomes, which we can share with each other and with our Euro-descendant col-
leagues gladly. However, because we are now able to speak in our own voices and our
practices are mediated through our own traditional cultures, we also find that we are
able to offer healing methods to our own communities that are received as familiar
and authentic.
One of the most pressing issues facing our society today is the question of manag-
ing this increasingly culturally diverse society with equity and justice. In this paper I
posit that cultural democracy is the most appropriate expression of social justice in a
multi-cultural society. The United States of America is experiencing an explosion of
cultural diversity in its population. In light of this explosion, a key question becomes,
How do we maintain social justice in such a manner that the cultural expressions and
ideas of one community does not dominate and have privilege above all others? Ramiriz
and Castaneda (1974) write that:
Cultural democracy is a philosophical precept which recognizes that the way a person
communicates, relates to others, seeks support and recognition from his environment
(incentive motivation), and thinks and learns (cognition) is a product of the value sys-
tem of his [sic] home and community. Furthermore, educational environments or poli-
cies that do not recognize the individuals right, as guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, to remain identified with the culture and language of his cultural group are
culturally undemocratic (p. 23).
The above definition of cultural democracy is a good starting point. However Dar-
der (1991) argues that this definition must be refined to reflect the critical question
of power relationships in a multi-ethnic society, which includes a dominant cultural
group and culturally subordinate communities. Darder writes:
Although [Ram�ırez and Casta~neda’s definition] argues for changing the cultural realities
of classrooms, it fails to address critically the necessary shift in power relationships
required in [society] in order to involve bicultural [communities] in an active process
of empowerment, assist them in finding their voice, and support the development of a
spirit of social solidarity (p. 62).
Darder argues that culturally democratic practices must move beyond simple inclu-
sion of diverse cultures (multiculturalism) and must focus on the asymmetrical rela-
tionships of power that actually exist between oppressed communities and the larger
European culture dominated society.
I would argue that this need to move beyond inclusion is particularly important in
the therapeutic community. This means that a part of the work of narrative and other
discursive therapists and community workers is to recognise the imbalance of power
M. M. Akinyela
48 ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense
which is evident in the production of knowledge and approaches to therapeutic prac-
tices grounded primarily in Euro-cultured language and metaphors, which are then
imposed on non-European communities. This is why it is so significant that other
voices are being identified as world communities speak on behalf of their own healing
in their own cultural languages with their own cultural meanings.
I believe that this also means that the conversation as it develops should and will
be not only between narrative therapists of European descent, but also between thera-
pists of Africa, Asia, the Americas and the Islands, amongst and between ourselves
sharing our own knowledge and experiences with our indigenous healing practices.
As cultural democracy becomes the norm and the imbalance of cultural power is
corrected, it is likely that we will see another shift and growth in the family therapy
and narrative therapy fields, as new ideas and effective creative practices introduce use-
ful practices to the field.
References
Akinyela, M. M. (2002). De-colonizing our lives: Divining a postcolonial therapy. The Interna-
tional Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 1(2), 32–43.
Akinyela, M. (2008). Once they come: Testimony therapy and healing questions for African
American couples, in M. McGoldrick & K. Hardy (Eds.), Revisioning Family Therapy: Race,
Class, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice, (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Darder, A. (1991). Culture and Power in the Classroom: Foundations for Cultural Education.
Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey Publications.
Ramiriz, M., & Castaneda, A. (1974). Cultural Democracy, Bicognitive Development and Educa-
tion. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Waldegrave, C., Tamasese, K., Tuhaka, F., & Campbell, W. (2003). Just Therapy – A journey:
A collection of Papers from the Just Therapy team of New Zealand. Adelaide, South Australia:
Dulwich Centre Publications.
Narrative Therapy & Cultural Democracy
ª 2014 Australian Association of Family Therapy 49
14678438, 2014, 1, D
ow
nloaded from
https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/doi/10.1002/anzf.1041 by U
niversity O
f M
assachusetts, W
iley O
nline L
ibrary on [21/09/2026]. See the T
erm
s and C
onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com
/term
s-and-conditions) on W
iley O
nline L
ibrary for rules of use; O
A
articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C
om
m
ons L
icense