My Blog

Tag: Constitutional

  • [Solved] Summative

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Imagine** you are the CFO for a criminal justice or private security agency. You are tasked with developing and presenting an operating budget proposal to your agency director. Your starting point for the operating budget is the _current year_. You will then build an operating budget for the _next…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Imagine** you are the CFO for a criminal justice or private security agency. You are tasked with developing and presenting an operating budget proposal to your agency director. Your starting point for the operating budget is the _current year_. You will then build an operating budget for the _next year_.

    **Select** a state or local criminal justice or security agency.

    **Research** the most recent budget for that agency. Use the resource at the end of the assignment as an example of an operating budget and how to search for one online.

    **Write** a 525- to 700-word budget proposal that contains operating expenses and revenue.

    **Include** the following in your proposal:

    – Your total budget. This can increase or decrease 5 percent.
    – The total for your operating budget and special line items. If you include the special line items, they must equal the total of all your revenue sources, which is called a balanced budget. There should be no deficit or surplus budgeting.
    – Increase or decrease of any expenditure or fund source you like. Any increase or decrease should be related to the issues you list in your summary.
    – Base your budget adjustments and issues on actual concerns your state or local jurisdiction is experiencing.

    **Insert** a table in the budget recommendation that includes columns for the _current year_ (your starting point) and the _next year_ (your recommendation). The table is not part of the summary word count.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Analysis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Gary and Gene were both drinking at a bar. Gary became angered after Gene asked Gary’s wife to dance. Gary walked up to Gene and struck him in the face. Gene fell to the floor, and as he was returning to his feet, Gary hit him…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Gary and Gene were both drinking at a bar. Gary became angered after Gene asked Gary’s wife to dance. Gary walked up to Gene and struck him in the face. Gene fell to the floor, and as he was returning to his feet, Gary hit him again. In response, Gene took a knife out of his pocket and attacked Gary with it. Gary then shot Gene with a gun he had hidden in his coat. The injury proved fatal. What crime has Gary committed?

    Demonstrate command of the material. Be thorough, and use citations _with page numbers_ throughout your answer to idenitfy your sources for definitions and principles. Write in a way that is professional and organized. Use paragraph breaks and, if appropriate, section breaks to present your answer clearly. Double space and submit your answer as a Word document.

    Material is Criminal Law and Procedure Eighth Edition by Daniel E Hall, mostly Chapter 8

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Last response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Document2.docx **## Document2.docx** 1. In "Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology," Rennison and Hart (2018) emphasize the importance of both descriptive and inferential statist…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Document2.docx

    **## Document2.docx**

    1. In "Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology," Rennison and Hart (2018) emphasize the importance of both descriptive and inferential statistics in research analysis and reporting. Descriptive statistics involve summarizing and organizing data to understand its main characteristics, providing a clear picture of the dataset's structure. Inferential statistics, on the other hand, allow researchers to make generalizations from a sample to a population, enabling hypothesis testing and predictions. Incorporating both types of statistics is crucial in criminal justice research. Descriptive statistics offer foundational insights by detailing data distributions, central tendencies, and variability, which help in understanding the context and scope of the research problem. Inferential statistics extend this understanding by assessing relationships between variables and determining the likelihood that observed patterns are due to chance, thereby supporting evidence-based conclusions. Together, these statistical approaches enhance the accuracy and credibility of research findings. By integrating descriptive and inferential analyses, researchers can comprehensively interpret data, ensuring that findings are both representative and applicable to broader contexts. This dual approach strengthens the overall research process, from data collection to the implementation of results in real-world scenarios.

    2. Data analysis plays a crucial role in research, and both descriptive and inferential statistics are necessary for making sense of data. Descriptive statistics help summarize and organize raw data, making it easier to understand patterns and trends. Measures like mean, median, standard deviation, and frequency distributions provide a clear picture of what the data looks like without making predictions or assumptions beyond the sample (Rennison, 2019). This type of analysis is essential in the initial stages of research, offering a foundation for deeper exploration. Inferential statistics, on the other hand, allow researchers to conclude a larger population based on a sample. Techniques like regression analysis, t-tests, and chi-square tests help determine relationships between variables and assess statistical significance. Without inferential statistics, researchers would be limited to describing what is in front of them rather than making broader claims about real-world implications. Both types of analysis work together, descriptive statistics provide the groundwork, while inferential statistics add depth by testing hypotheses and supporting decision-making. In reporting research, it is important to use both approaches to ensure findings are not only clearly presented but also meaningfully interpreted (Rennison, 2019).

    **## Document2.docx**

    1. In "Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology," Rennison and Hart (2018) emphasize the importance of both descriptive and inferential statistics in research analysis and reporting. Descriptive statistics involve summarizing and organizing data to understand its main characteristics, providing a clear picture of the dataset's structure. Inferential statistics, on the other hand, allow researchers to make generalizations from a sample to a population, enabling hypothesis testing and predictions. Incorporating both types of statistics is crucial in criminal justice research. Descriptive statistics offer foundational insights by detailing data distributions, central tendencies, and variability, which help in understanding the context and scope of the research problem. Inferential statistics extend this understanding by assessing relationships between variables and determining the likelihood that observed patterns are due to chance, thereby supporting evidence-based conclusions. Together, these statistical approaches enhance the accuracy and credibility of research findings. By integrating descriptive and inferential analyses, researchers can comprehensively interpret data, ensuring that findings are both representative and applicable to broader contexts. This dual approach strengthens the overall research process, from data collection to the implementation of results in real-world scenarios.

    2. Data analysis plays a crucial role in research, and both descriptive and inferential statistics are necessary for making sense of data. Descriptive statistics help summarize and organize raw data, making it easier to understand patterns and trends. Measures like mean, median, standard deviation, and frequency distributions provide a clear picture of what the data looks like without making predictions or assumptions beyond the sample (Rennison, 2019). This type of analysis is essential in the initial stages of research, offering a foundation for deeper exploration. Inferential statistics, on the other hand, allow researchers to conclude a larger population based on a sample. Techniques like regression analysis, t-tests, and chi-square tests help determine relationships between variables and assess statistical significance. Without inferential statistics, researchers would be limited to describing what is in front of them rather than making broader claims about real-world implications. Both types of analysis work together, descriptive statistics provide the groundwork, while inferential statistics add depth by testing hypotheses and supporting decision-making. In reporting research, it is important to use both approaches to ensure findings are not only clearly presented but also meaningfully interpreted (Rennison, 2019).

  • [Solved] Ethics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – [\ \ IMG_7547.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7547-png-10229189 "IMG_7547.png") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – [\
    \
    IMG_7547.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-7547-png-10229189 "IMG_7547.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Law – Criminal Last Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Need help with last assignment. – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## assignment3.docx **## assignment3.docx** Review the six programs you presented last week and select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Need help with last assignment.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## assignment3.docx

    **## assignment3.docx**

    Review the six programs you presented last week and select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues. Review
    [Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552?wrap=1) [Download Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552/download?download_frd=1) scenarios, as needed, to refresh your memory.

    Then, using the information in chapters 11, 12, and 13 in
    _Community Policing: A Police-Citizen Partnership_,
    [Innovations in Community-Based Crime Prevention: Case Studies and Lessons](https://research-ebsco-com.libdatab.strayer.edu/c/clktk4/search/details/abvrbl4g2v?db=nlebk) and your own research, to create a report that determines and details the programs you feel would best address each of the three scenarios documented in the Community Issues PDF.

    **Instructions**

    Of the six programs you presented last week, select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues. For each of the three programs:

    · Evaluate each of the three programs in detail to include specific actions taken and anticipated positive results.

    · Determine the stakeholders who will be part of the program, including an explanation of each of their roles.

    · Establish two potential challenges that may arise with the implementation of each program.

    · Present policy proposals that will address each of those challenges.

    · Support the writing with at least five sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the
    [library](https://library.strayer.edu/) or review
    [library guides](https://library.strayer.edu/guides).

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    · Apply criminal justice theories as a problem-solving tool for identified situations.

    · Demonstrate effective communication via multiple channels.

    · Demonstrate effective research and analysis of complex criminal justice issues and policies.

    · Analyze policy in order to create and implement appropriate revisions.

    **Resources**

    · From
    _Community Policing: A Police-Citizen Partnership_:

    · Chapter 11, "
    [Selected Approaches to Training and Planning](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_261)."

    · Chapter 12, "
    [Distinctive Community-Policing Programs](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_301)."

    · Chapter 13, "
    [The Future of Community Policing](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_327)."

    ·
    [Innovations in Community-Based Crime Prevention: Case Studies and Lessons](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2553236&site=eds-live&scope=site).

    ·
    [Criminal Justice Research Collection](https://library.strayer.edu/cjrc)

    ·
    [Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552?wrap=1) [Download Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552/download?download_frd=1)

    **## assignment3.docx**

    Review the six programs you presented last week and select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues. Review
    [Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552?wrap=1) [Download Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552/download?download_frd=1) scenarios, as needed, to refresh your memory.

    Then, using the information in chapters 11, 12, and 13 in
    _Community Policing: A Police-Citizen Partnership_,
    [Innovations in Community-Based Crime Prevention: Case Studies and Lessons](https://research-ebsco-com.libdatab.strayer.edu/c/clktk4/search/details/abvrbl4g2v?db=nlebk) and your own research, to create a report that determines and details the programs you feel would best address each of the three scenarios documented in the Community Issues PDF.

    **Instructions**

    Of the six programs you presented last week, select one for each of the three given scenarios that you feel would have the greatest impact on the identified issues. For each of the three programs:

    · Evaluate each of the three programs in detail to include specific actions taken and anticipated positive results.

    · Determine the stakeholders who will be part of the program, including an explanation of each of their roles.

    · Establish two potential challenges that may arise with the implementation of each program.

    · Present policy proposals that will address each of those challenges.

    · Support the writing with at least five sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the
    [library](https://library.strayer.edu/) or review
    [library guides](https://library.strayer.edu/guides).

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    · Apply criminal justice theories as a problem-solving tool for identified situations.

    · Demonstrate effective communication via multiple channels.

    · Demonstrate effective research and analysis of complex criminal justice issues and policies.

    · Analyze policy in order to create and implement appropriate revisions.

    **Resources**

    · From
    _Community Policing: A Police-Citizen Partnership_:

    · Chapter 11, "
    [Selected Approaches to Training and Planning](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_261)."

    · Chapter 12, "
    [Distinctive Community-Policing Programs](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_301)."

    · Chapter 13, "
    [The Future of Community Policing](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=354857&site=eds-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_327)."

    ·
    [Innovations in Community-Based Crime Prevention: Case Studies and Lessons](http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2553236&site=eds-live&scope=site).

    ·
    [Criminal Justice Research Collection](https://library.strayer.edu/cjrc)

    ·
    [Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552?wrap=1) [Download Community Issues [PDF]](https://canvas.strayer.edu/courses/17775/files/10320552/download?download_frd=1)

  • [Solved] Practical 5 – Latents

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) I need help examining these latent patterns and connecting the finger prints. – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## PracticalExam5ALL.pdf **## PracticalExam5ALL.pdf** Pattern Type: Pattern Type: Comparison Results: Name: Pattern Ty…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    I need help examining these latent patterns and connecting the finger prints.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## PracticalExam5ALL.pdf

    **## PracticalExam5ALL.pdf**

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Name:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    1

    2

    3

    Comparison Results:

    Name: Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    4

    5

    6

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    7

    8

    9

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    10

    11

    12

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Name:

    – Wk9 – Practical Excercise A
    – Wk9 – Practical Exercise B
    – Wk9 – Practical Exercise C

    01. PatternTypeA1: [ ]
    02. PatternTypeB1: [ ]
    03. PatternTypeA2: [ ]
    04. PatternTypeB2: [ ]
    05. PatternTypeA3: [ ]
    06. PatternTypeB3: [ ]
    07. PatternTypeA4: [ ]
    08. PatternTypeB4: [ ]
    09. PatternTypeA5: [ ]
    10. PatternTypeB5: [ ]
    11. PatternTypeA6: [ ]
    12. PatternTypeB6: [ ]
    13. PatternTypeA7: [ ]
    14. PatternTypeB7: [ ]
    15. PatternTypeA8: [ ]
    16. PatternTypeB8: [ ]
    17. PatternTypeA9: [ ]
    18. PatternTypeB9: [ ]
    19. PatternTypeA10: [ ]
    20. PatternTypeB10: [ ]
    21. Comparison1: [ ]
    22. Comparison2: [ ]
    23. Comparison3: [ ]
    24. Comparison4: [ ]
    25. Comparison5: [ ]
    26. Comparison6: [ ]
    27. Comparison7: [ ]
    28. Comparison8: [ ]
    29. Comparison9: [ ]
    30. Comparison10: [ ]
    31. Comparison11: [ ]
    32. Comparison12: [ ]
    33. A:
    34. B:
    35. C:
    36. NameA:
    37. ComparisonA1: [ ]
    38. ComparisonA2: [ ]
    39. ComparisonA3: [ ]
    40. ComparisonA4: [ ]
    41. ComparisonA5: [ ]
    42. ComparisonA6: [ ]
    43. ComparisonA7: [ ]
    44. ComparisonA8: [ ]
    45. ComparisonA9: [ ]
    46. ComparisonA10: [ ]
    47. NameB:
    48. NameC:

    **## PracticalExam5ALL.pdf**

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Name:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    Pattern Type: Pattern Type:

    Comparison Results:

    1

    2

    3

    Comparison Results:

    Name: Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    4

    5

    6

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    7

    8

    9

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    10

    11

    12

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Comparison Results:

    Name:

    – Wk9 – Practical Excercise A
    – Wk9 – Practical Exercise B
    – Wk9 – Practical Exercise C

    01. PatternTypeA1: [ ]
    02. PatternTypeB1: [ ]
    03. PatternTypeA2: [ ]
    04. PatternTypeB2: [ ]
    05. PatternTypeA3: [ ]
    06. PatternTypeB3: [ ]
    07. PatternTypeA4: [ ]
    08. PatternTypeB4: [ ]
    09. PatternTypeA5: [ ]
    10. PatternTypeB5: [ ]
    11. PatternTypeA6: [ ]
    12. PatternTypeB6: [ ]
    13. PatternTypeA7: [ ]
    14. PatternTypeB7: [ ]
    15. PatternTypeA8: [ ]
    16. PatternTypeB8: [ ]
    17. PatternTypeA9: [ ]
    18. PatternTypeB9: [ ]
    19. PatternTypeA10: [ ]
    20. PatternTypeB10: [ ]
    21. Comparison1: [ ]
    22. Comparison2: [ ]
    23. Comparison3: [ ]
    24. Comparison4: [ ]
    25. Comparison5: [ ]
    26. Comparison6: [ ]
    27. Comparison7: [ ]
    28. Comparison8: [ ]
    29. Comparison9: [ ]
    30. Comparison10: [ ]
    31. Comparison11: [ ]
    32. Comparison12: [ ]
    33. A:
    34. B:
    35. C:
    36. NameA:
    37. ComparisonA1: [ ]
    38. ComparisonA2: [ ]
    39. ComparisonA3: [ ]
    40. ComparisonA4: [ ]
    41. ComparisonA5: [ ]
    42. ComparisonA6: [ ]
    43. ComparisonA7: [ ]
    44. ComparisonA8: [ ]
    45. ComparisonA9: [ ]
    46. ComparisonA10: [ ]
    47. NameB:
    48. NameC:

  • [Solved] Week 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## week2.docx – ## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx **## week2.docx** **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## week2.docx

    – ## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx

    **## week2.docx**

    **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references must be listed in APA style._**

    Due 3/19/2025

    1. Briefly describe a criminal justice program in your community.

    2.
    Discuss the mission and goals of the program, including the specific population served

    3.
    List three possible outcomes this program may want to incorporate and assess.  Remember that outcomes should be measurable, relevant to the mission, and linked to the program's activities.

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## week2.docx**

    **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references must be listed in APA style._**

    Due 3/19/2025

    1. Briefly describe a criminal justice program in your community.

    2.
    Discuss the mission and goals of the program, including the specific population served

    3.
    List three possible outcomes this program may want to incorporate and assess.  Remember that outcomes should be measurable, relevant to the mission, and linked to the program's activities.

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## week2.docx**

    **_Your response to this discussion question must be 200 words, substantive, contain appropriate citations, and all references must be listed in APA style._**

    Due 3/19/2025

    1. Briefly describe a criminal justice program in your community.

    2.
    Discuss the mission and goals of the program, including the specific population served

    3.
    List three possible outcomes this program may want to incorporate and assess.  Remember that outcomes should be measurable, relevant to the mission, and linked to the program's activities.

    **## Chapter02_Lecture_Slides.pptx**

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Chapter 2

    Planning a Program Evaluation

    ‹#›

    Book Cover

    Here

    ‹#›

    1

    Introduction

    SARA

    Scanning: Identify recurring problems and how they affect community safety

    Analysis: Determine the causes of the problem

    Response: Seek out, select, and implement activities to solve the problem

    Assessment: Determine if the response was effective or identify new strategies

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    POP

    Emphasizes Identifying and Analyzing Problems

    Implements Solutions to Deal with the Root Causes of the Problem

    Focuses on the Problem as a Long- Term Solution

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Problem Oriented Policing

    Two Ways to Define a Problem

    Problem for an Individual

    Problem for a Group of Citizens

    Basis for an Outcome Evaluation

    Concerns with the Data

    Resource Questions to be Addressed

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Planning an Evaluation Strategy

    Evaluation Planning involves the Completing of Five Basic Steps:

    Stating the Goals of the Program in Clear and Measurable Terms

    Determining the Relationship between Goals and Objectives

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Determining the Data to be Collected on these Measures

    Determining Analysis Methods

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Stating Goals in Measurable Terms

    Program Goals are based on the wishes of a particular group rather than a definite target

    Evaluator Attempts to State the Goals

    i.e. Percentage of crime reduction

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Goal/Objective Relationship

    To achieve the goal or objective of the program in relationship to surrounding areas

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Identify the Evaluation Measures for the Program Under Consideration

    Effectiveness- measures that determine the degree of success of the program in dealing with the problem at hand

    Efficiency- measures should indicate how well the problem has been implemented and whether it has been implemented according to the original plan for the program

    Attitudinal- measures can indicate whether the program has been successful by assessing the attitudes of the program clients

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Developing Evaluation Measures

    Valid Performance Measures:

    Should be Credible

    Provide a Fair Indication of Program Performance

    Should be Clear

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Data Collection

    Determine the data necessary to perform the evaluation

    The evaluator must decide if the measures are valid indicators

    The Evaluator must determine the cost of obtaining data

    Data must be carefully collected

    “Quality Control”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Determining Analysis Methods

    The evaluator must decide between quantitative and qualitative methods

    Four Strategies for Understanding the Problem that the Proposed Program Addresses:

    1.Hold discussions with research clients or sponsors to obtain the clearest possible picture of their concerns.

    2.Review the relevant literature on the subject.

    3.Gather current information from experts and major interested parties on the issue.

    4.Conduct information-gathering visits and observations to obtain a real-world sense of the context and talk with persons actively involved in the issue.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Theory Informs Program Operations By:

    Driving the selection of treatments.

    Clarifying the description of the services provided to clients with defined needs.

    Helping to determine what variables need to be measured.

    Driving how one interprets a simple comparison of the outcomes of two programs to deeper analyses in terms of research on the topical area in general.

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Logic Model

    Logic Model- specifies the conceptual framework of an evaluation by establishing the variables to be measured and the expected relationships between them

    Help explain how the program is intended to work

    “Clear Road Map”

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The trapped administrator is committed to the relevance and significance of the program

    The experimental administrator has a decidedly broader view and is committed to the improvement of public policy rather than the promotion of a particular program

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Politics of Evaluation Research

    The Answers Program Administrators Seek:

    To Evaluate: How well is my agency performing?

    To Control: How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing?

    To Manage the Budget: On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public’s money?

    To Motivate: How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for -profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

    To Promote: How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job?

    To Celebrate: What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success?

    To Learn: Know why a program is working or not

    To Improve: What exactly should everyone do differently to improve performance?

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    The ultimate aim is to prevent harm to research subjects while promoting a research design that will generate valid and relevant results that will help inform public policy

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    The Ethics of Research

    Five Ethical Principles

    Systematic Inquiry

    The Competence of Evaluators

    The Integrity and Honesty of Evaluators

    The Respect for People

    Anonymity

    Confidentiality

    The Full Disclosure of Potential Harm

    Upholds the Evaluator’s Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Distinguish between an evaluator and a consultant

    The evaluator must maintain an independent and objective stance but may be called upon to offer advice about program operations as it is designed, implemented, and becomes operational

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    Ethics and Social Relationships in Evaluation Research

    Research Contract Can Lead to Several Misinterpretations and Ethical Difficulties

    A contract often clouds the issue of who owns the research work and results

    Uncertainty of the findings can affect the program administrator

    Evaluator must maintain both independence and objectivity

    Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

    ‹#›

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

  • [Solved] police & society

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Read all of the sections related to officer stress and fatigue found on the National Institute of Justice’s website. What are some of the effects from stress and fatigue? What are some of the solutions that the NIJ offers for …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Read all of the sections related to officer stress and fatigue found on the National Institute of Justice’s website. What are some of the effects from stress and fatigue? What are some of the solutions that the NIJ offers for preventing fatigue and stress? Which preventative measure do you feel would be the most effective? Support your answers with evidence. Don't forget to cite and reference your work.

    [http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/stress-fatigue/Pages/welcome.aspx](http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/stress-fatigue/Pages/welcome.aspx)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Choose either the Jon Benet Ramsey case or OJ Simpson and write review of what mistakes were made by law enforcement and the effect it had on the case. Be sure to include references and intext citations. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Choose either the Jon Benet Ramsey case or OJ Simpson and write  review of what mistakes were made by law enforcement and the effect it had on the case. Be sure to include references and intext citations.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Weekly Discussions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) See attached – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## WeeklyDiscussions.pdf – Ch.6ofEssentialCriminalLawcomplete.pdf **## WeeklyDiscussions.pdf** Wk 1 Discussion – You Decide Read the following section below from your Essential Crimin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    See attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## WeeklyDiscussions.pdf

    – Ch.6ofEssentialCriminalLawcomplete.pdf

    **## WeeklyDiscussions.pdf**

    Wk 1 Discussion – You Decide

    Read the following section below from your Essential Criminal Law textbook:

    Ch. 3, You Decide 3.5 (p. 69)

    You Decide 3.5

    Defendant Israel Cervantes and fellow gang members of the Highland Street gang went to a
    birthday party for a member of the Alley Boys gang. The two gangs were not enemies.
    Cervantes approached a woman named Grace who refused his invitation to go to another
    party. Cervantes called her a “ho,” and the two exchanged insults. Juan Cisneros, a
    member of the Alley Boys, told Cervantes that he was disrespecting his “homegirl.” Richard
    Linares, a member of the Alley Boys, tried to calm the situation. Cisneros, however, drew a
    gun and threatened to “cap” Cervantes. Cervantes pulled out his own gun. Linares
    responded by “pushing or touching” Cervantes in an effort to separate him from Cisneros.
    The defendant Cervantes stated that “nobody touches me” and shot Linares through the
    arm and chest. A large-scale fight ensued between the gangs, and gang “challenges were
    exchanged.”

    A short time later, a group of Highland Street gang members saw Hector Cabrera, a
    member of the Alley Boys, entering his car. Five gang members fired shots and participated
    in killing Cabrera.

    Would you hold Cervantes liable for the murder of Cabrera? See People v. Cervantes, 29
    P.3d 225 (Cal. 2001).

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Discuss the case and your response to the question posed in the activity. How did
    you come to your decision?

    Answer 1:

    Wk 2 Discussion – Criminal Defense Issues

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Refer to the criminal defenses discussed in Ch. 6 of Essential Criminal Law (see
    attached). Which criminal defense do you believe is the most controversial? Why?

    • Do you believe there are any circumstances when a criminal should not be held
    responsible for his or her crime? Explain.

    Answer 2:

    Wk 3 Discussion – Dealing with Cybercrimes

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • What is the greatest cybercrime threat in the U.S. today? How can it be prevented?

    • Do you agree or disagree with the penalties in your state for cybercrimes? Do you
    agree or disagree with the federal penalties for cybercrimes? What punishment do
    cyber criminals deserve? Explain your answers.

    • How can we protect ourselves against cybercrimes?

    Answer 3:

    Wk 4 Discussion – Addressing Public Order Crimes

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • What are public order crimes?

    • Why is public order necessary?

    • Why are public order crimes called “victimless”?

    • Do you believe any of the public order crimes should be legalized? Explain your
    reasoning.

    Answer 4:

    Wk 5 Discussion – Punishment in America

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should?
    Explain.

    • Are there any crimes that are currently punished that you think should not be?
    Explain.

    • Is there any punishment that you believe is unethical or immoral? Explain.

    Answer 5:

    **Ch.6ofEssentialCriminalLawcomplete.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ch-6ofessentialcriminallawcomplete-pdf)

    **Ch.6ofEssentialCriminalLawcomplete.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ch-6ofessentialcriminallawcomplete-pdf)

    **## WeeklyDiscussions.pdf**

    Wk 1 Discussion – You Decide

    Read the following section below from your Essential Criminal Law textbook:

    Ch. 3, You Decide 3.5 (p. 69)

    You Decide 3.5

    Defendant Israel Cervantes and fellow gang members of the Highland Street gang went to a
    birthday party for a member of the Alley Boys gang. The two gangs were not enemies.
    Cervantes approached a woman named Grace who refused his invitation to go to another
    party. Cervantes called her a “ho,” and the two exchanged insults. Juan Cisneros, a
    member of the Alley Boys, told Cervantes that he was disrespecting his “homegirl.” Richard
    Linares, a member of the Alley Boys, tried to calm the situation. Cisneros, however, drew a
    gun and threatened to “cap” Cervantes. Cervantes pulled out his own gun. Linares
    responded by “pushing or touching” Cervantes in an effort to separate him from Cisneros.
    The defendant Cervantes stated that “nobody touches me” and shot Linares through the
    arm and chest. A large-scale fight ensued between the gangs, and gang “challenges were
    exchanged.”

    A short time later, a group of Highland Street gang members saw Hector Cabrera, a
    member of the Alley Boys, entering his car. Five gang members fired shots and participated
    in killing Cabrera.

    Would you hold Cervantes liable for the murder of Cabrera? See People v. Cervantes, 29
    P.3d 225 (Cal. 2001).

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Discuss the case and your response to the question posed in the activity. How did
    you come to your decision?

    Answer 1:

    Wk 2 Discussion – Criminal Defense Issues

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Refer to the criminal defenses discussed in Ch. 6 of Essential Criminal Law (see
    attached). Which criminal defense do you believe is the most controversial? Why?

    • Do you believe there are any circumstances when a criminal should not be held
    responsible for his or her crime? Explain.

    Answer 2:

    Wk 3 Discussion – Dealing with Cybercrimes

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • What is the greatest cybercrime threat in the U.S. today? How can it be prevented?

    • Do you agree or disagree with the penalties in your state for cybercrimes? Do you
    agree or disagree with the federal penalties for cybercrimes? What punishment do
    cyber criminals deserve? Explain your answers.

    • How can we protect ourselves against cybercrimes?

    Answer 3:

    Wk 4 Discussion – Addressing Public Order Crimes

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • What are public order crimes?

    • Why is public order necessary?

    • Why are public order crimes called “victimless”?

    • Do you believe any of the public order crimes should be legalized? Explain your
    reasoning.

    Answer 4:

    Wk 5 Discussion – Punishment in America

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should?
    Explain.

    • Are there any crimes that are currently punished that you think should not be?
    Explain.

    • Is there any punishment that you believe is unethical or immoral? Explain.

    Answer 5:

    **Ch.6ofEssentialCriminalLawcomplete.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ch-6ofessentialcriminallawcomplete-pdf)

    **## WeeklyDiscussions.pdf**

    Wk 1 Discussion – You Decide

    Read the following section below from your Essential Criminal Law textbook:

    Ch. 3, You Decide 3.5 (p. 69)

    You Decide 3.5

    Defendant Israel Cervantes and fellow gang members of the Highland Street gang went to a
    birthday party for a member of the Alley Boys gang. The two gangs were not enemies.
    Cervantes approached a woman named Grace who refused his invitation to go to another
    party. Cervantes called her a “ho,” and the two exchanged insults. Juan Cisneros, a
    member of the Alley Boys, told Cervantes that he was disrespecting his “homegirl.” Richard
    Linares, a member of the Alley Boys, tried to calm the situation. Cisneros, however, drew a
    gun and threatened to “cap” Cervantes. Cervantes pulled out his own gun. Linares
    responded by “pushing or touching” Cervantes in an effort to separate him from Cisneros.
    The defendant Cervantes stated that “nobody touches me” and shot Linares through the
    arm and chest. A large-scale fight ensued between the gangs, and gang “challenges were
    exchanged.”

    A short time later, a group of Highland Street gang members saw Hector Cabrera, a
    member of the Alley Boys, entering his car. Five gang members fired shots and participated
    in killing Cabrera.

    Would you hold Cervantes liable for the murder of Cabrera? See People v. Cervantes, 29
    P.3d 225 (Cal. 2001).

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Discuss the case and your response to the question posed in the activity. How did
    you come to your decision?

    Answer 1:

    Wk 2 Discussion – Criminal Defense Issues

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Refer to the criminal defenses discussed in Ch. 6 of Essential Criminal Law (see
    attached). Which criminal defense do you believe is the most controversial? Why?

    • Do you believe there are any circumstances when a criminal should not be held
    responsible for his or her crime? Explain.

    Answer 2:

    Wk 3 Discussion – Dealing with Cybercrimes

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • What is the greatest cybercrime threat in the U.S. today? How can it be prevented?

    • Do you agree or disagree with the penalties in your state for cybercrimes? Do you
    agree or disagree with the federal penalties for cybercrimes? What punishment do
    cyber criminals deserve? Explain your answers.

    • How can we protect ourselves against cybercrimes?

    Answer 3:

    Wk 4 Discussion – Addressing Public Order Crimes

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • What are public order crimes?

    • Why is public order necessary?

    • Why are public order crimes called “victimless”?

    • Do you believe any of the public order crimes should be legalized? Explain your
    reasoning.

    Answer 4:

    Wk 5 Discussion – Punishment in America

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should?
    Explain.

    • Are there any crimes that are currently punished that you think should not be?
    Explain.

    • Is there any punishment that you believe is unethical or immoral? Explain.

    Answer 5:

    **Ch.6ofEssentialCriminalLawcomplete.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ch-6ofessentialcriminallawcomplete-pdf)