Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**Prevention Health Campaign**
– a month ago
**files (2)**
– ## module1.2assignmnet.docx
– ## Module1Assignment1.2-RUBRIC.docx
**## module1.2assignmnet.docx**
**Assignment Description:**
**Prevention Health Campaign Essay**
Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with
**at least four (4) sources in your essay**. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
**The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**
For this week’s assignment, please use the following instructions:
· Go to your State Public Health Department website and identify one primary prevention health campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in your state of residence.
· Once you have identified one primary prevention health campaign, share in one to two succinct paragraphs the findings and outcomes of the campaign.
· In addition, please describe the challenges and/or opportunities evidenced in this campaign.
· Furthermore, list the formative and summative evaluation methods to determine the efficacy or ineffectiveness of the campaign.
· Lastly, identify and discuss at least two approaches that would enhance the implementation of the campaign. For example, you may discuss how including an Advisory Board to guide the implementation of the campaign may enhance programmatic and/or operational outcomes.
**Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.**
1. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.
2. The following specifications are required for this assignment:
3. Length: 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
4. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.
5. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at
**least four (4) scholarly sources to** support your claims.
6.
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**Learning Materials**
**References**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 1.
**Additional**
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015).
_Priorities of the_
_National Quality Strategy_.
[http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html](http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html)
Kulbok, P. A., Thatcher, E., Park, E., & Meszaros, P. S. (2012). Evolving
Public Health Nursing Roles: Focus on Community Participatory Health Promotion and Prevention.
_The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17._ [https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/](https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_
_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module1Assignment1.2-RUBRIC.docx**
…
9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspe…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction
/Thesis
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
Quality of
Information
or Evidence
Weight:
%
25
/ 25
0
points
Weak or no in
–
troduction of
topic. Purpose
is
unclear/thesis
is weak or
missing.
7
points
Basic introduc
–
tion that states
topic but lacks
interest. Thesis
is somewhat
clear and
arguable.
8
points
Proficient in
–
troduction that
is interesting
and states
topic. Thesis is
clear and ar
–
guable state
–
ment of
position.
10
points
Exceptional in
–
troduction that
grabs interest
of reader and
states topic;
Thesis is ex
–
ceptionally
clear, arguable,
well-devel
–
oped, and a de
–
finitive
statement.
0
points
Information
has little or
nothing to do
with the thesis.
Information
has weak or no
connection to
the thesis.
17.5
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic, but
few details
and/or exam
–
ples are given.
Indicates a lim
–
ited variety of
sources.
20
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic.
Paper is re
–
searched in
sufficient detail
and from a va
–
riety of
sources. All
necessary con
–
tent is
included.
25
points
Paper is excep
–
tionally re
–
searched, ex
–
tremely de
–
tailed, and ac
–
curate.
Information
clearly relates
to the thesis.
Appropriate
content is cov
–
ered in depth
without being
redundant.
**Criterion Score**
Support of
Thesis/Anal
ysis Weight:
%
20
/ 20
Organizatio
n/
Developme
nt of Thesis
Weight:
15
%
/ 15
Conclusion
Weight: 5%
/ 5
0
points
Limited or no
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Lacks
analysis.
points
14
Some connec
–
tions have
been made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis, though
they may be
tenuous.
Minimal analy
–
sis is evident,
but may not
provide needed
support for
thesis.
16
points
Consistent
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Analysis
sufficiently
supports
thesis.
points
20
Exceptionally
critical, rele
–
vant, and con
–
sistent connec
–
tions made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis. Excellent
analysis is
evident.
0
points
Lacks develop
–
ment of ideas
with weak or
no transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
10.5
points
Somewhat
clear develop
–
ment, though
perhaps illogi
–
cal, with basic
transitions be
–
tween and
within
paragraphs.
12
points
Clear and logi
–
cal order that
supports thesis
with appropri
–
ate transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
points
15
Exceptionally
clear, logical,
mature, and
thorough de
–
velopment of
thesis with ex
–
cellent transi
–
tions between
and within
paragraphs.
points
0
Lacks a sum
–
mary of topic.
Conclusions
missing or
irrelevant.
3.5
points
Basic summary
of topic with
–
out final con
–
cluding ideas.
Inappropriately
introduces new
information.
4
points
Good summary
of topic with
credible con
–
cluding ideas.
Introduces no
new
information.
points
5
Excellent sum
–
mary of topic
with succinct
and precise
concluding
ideas that im
–
pact reader.
**Criterion Score**
Quality of
Written
Communica
tion Weight:
15
%
/ 15
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate
or do not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Word choice is
excessively re
–
dundant,
clichéd, and
unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, punctua
–
tion, and para
–
graphing.
Surface errors
are pervasive
enough that
they impede
communication
of meaning.
points
10.5
Style and voice
are somewhat
appropriate to
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
often unspe
–
cific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
12
Style and voice
are appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is spe
–
cific and pur
–
poseful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting to
the reader.
Correct sen
–
tence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are
used.
points
15
Style and voice
are not only
appropriate to
the given audi
–
ence and pur
–
pose, but also
show original
–
ity and creativ
–
ity. Word
choice is spe
–
cific, purpose
–
ful, dynamic
and varied.
Free of me
–
chanical and
typographical
errors. A vari
–
ety of sentence
structures and
effective fig
–
ures of speech
are used.
Writer is
clearly in com
–
mand of stan
–
dard, written,
academic
English.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
APA Format
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
APA format
and style are
not evident.
7
points
Missing APA el
–
ements; in-text
citations,
where neces
–
sary, are used
but formatted
inaccurately
and not
referenced.
8
points
All key ele
–
ments of an
APA title page
are present; In-
text citations
and a reference
page are
present with
few format er
–
rors.
Mechanics of
writing are re
–
flective of APA
style.
points
10
A broad under
–
standing of
APA format
and style is evi
–
dent. Accurate
citations and
references are
presented. No
APA errors are
evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
1/4
**## Module1Assignment1.2-RUBRIC.docx**
…
9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspe…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction
/Thesis
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
Quality of
Information
or Evidence
Weight:
%
25
/ 25
0
points
Weak or no in
–
troduction of
topic. Purpose
is
unclear/thesis
is weak or
missing.
7
points
Basic introduc
–
tion that states
topic but lacks
interest. Thesis
is somewhat
clear and
arguable.
8
points
Proficient in
–
troduction that
is interesting
and states
topic. Thesis is
clear and ar
–
guable state
–
ment of
position.
10
points
Exceptional in
–
troduction that
grabs interest
of reader and
states topic;
Thesis is ex
–
ceptionally
clear, arguable,
well-devel
–
oped, and a de
–
finitive
statement.
0
points
Information
has little or
nothing to do
with the thesis.
Information
has weak or no
connection to
the thesis.
17.5
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic, but
few details
and/or exam
–
ples are given.
Indicates a lim
–
ited variety of
sources.
20
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic.
Paper is re
–
searched in
sufficient detail
and from a va
–
riety of
sources. All
necessary con
–
tent is
included.
25
points
Paper is excep
–
tionally re
–
searched, ex
–
tremely de
–
tailed, and ac
–
curate.
Information
clearly relates
to the thesis.
Appropriate
content is cov
–
ered in depth
without being
redundant.
**Criterion Score**
Support of
Thesis/Anal
ysis Weight:
%
20
/ 20
Organizatio
n/
Developme
nt of Thesis
Weight:
15
%
/ 15
Conclusion
Weight: 5%
/ 5
0
points
Limited or no
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Lacks
analysis.
points
14
Some connec
–
tions have
been made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis, though
they may be
tenuous.
Minimal analy
–
sis is evident,
but may not
provide needed
support for
thesis.
16
points
Consistent
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Analysis
sufficiently
supports
thesis.
points
20
Exceptionally
critical, rele
–
vant, and con
–
sistent connec
–
tions made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis. Excellent
analysis is
evident.
0
points
Lacks develop
–
ment of ideas
with weak or
no transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
10.5
points
Somewhat
clear develop
–
ment, though
perhaps illogi
–
cal, with basic
transitions be
–
tween and
within
paragraphs.
12
points
Clear and logi
–
cal order that
supports thesis
with appropri
–
ate transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
points
15
Exceptionally
clear, logical,
mature, and
thorough de
–
velopment of
thesis with ex
–
cellent transi
–
tions between
and within
paragraphs.
points
0
Lacks a sum
–
mary of topic.
Conclusions
missing or
irrelevant.
3.5
points
Basic summary
of topic with
–
out final con
–
cluding ideas.
Inappropriately
introduces new
information.
4
points
Good summary
of topic with
credible con
–
cluding ideas.
Introduces no
new
information.
points
5
Excellent sum
–
mary of topic
with succinct
and precise
concluding
ideas that im
–
pact reader.
**Criterion Score**
Quality of
Written
Communica
tion Weight:
15
%
/ 15
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate
or do not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Word choice is
excessively re
–
dundant,
clichéd, and
unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, punctua
–
tion, and para
–
graphing.
Surface errors
are pervasive
enough that
they impede
communication
of meaning.
points
10.5
Style and voice
are somewhat
appropriate to
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
often unspe
–
cific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
12
Style and voice
are appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is spe
–
cific and pur
–
poseful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting to
the reader.
Correct sen
–
tence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are
used.
points
15
Style and voice
are not only
appropriate to
the given audi
–
ence and pur
–
pose, but also
show original
–
ity and creativ
–
ity. Word
choice is spe
–
cific, purpose
–
ful, dynamic
and varied.
Free of me
–
chanical and
typographical
errors. A vari
–
ety of sentence
structures and
effective fig
–
ures of speech
are used.
Writer is
clearly in com
–
mand of stan
–
dard, written,
academic
English.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
APA Format
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
APA format
and style are
not evident.
7
points
Missing APA el
–
ements; in-text
citations,
where neces
–
sary, are used
but formatted
inaccurately
and not
referenced.
8
points
All key ele
–
ments of an
APA title page
are present; In-
text citations
and a reference
page are
present with
few format er
–
rors.
Mechanics of
writing are re
–
flective of APA
style.
points
10
A broad under
–
standing of
APA format
and style is evi
–
dent. Accurate
citations and
references are
presented. No
APA errors are
evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
1/4
**## module1.2assignmnet.docx**
**Assignment Description:**
**Prevention Health Campaign Essay**
Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with
**at least four (4) sources in your essay**. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
**The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**
For this week’s assignment, please use the following instructions:
· Go to your State Public Health Department website and identify one primary prevention health campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in your state of residence.
· Once you have identified one primary prevention health campaign, share in one to two succinct paragraphs the findings and outcomes of the campaign.
· In addition, please describe the challenges and/or opportunities evidenced in this campaign.
· Furthermore, list the formative and summative evaluation methods to determine the efficacy or ineffectiveness of the campaign.
· Lastly, identify and discuss at least two approaches that would enhance the implementation of the campaign. For example, you may discuss how including an Advisory Board to guide the implementation of the campaign may enhance programmatic and/or operational outcomes.
**Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.**
1. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.
2. The following specifications are required for this assignment:
3. Length: 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
4. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.
5. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at
**least four (4) scholarly sources to** support your claims.
6.
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**Learning Materials**
**References**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 1.
**Additional**
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015).
_Priorities of the_
_National Quality Strategy_.
[http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html](http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html)
Kulbok, P. A., Thatcher, E., Park, E., & Meszaros, P. S. (2012). Evolving
Public Health Nursing Roles: Focus on Community Participatory Health Promotion and Prevention.
_The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17._ [https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/](https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_
_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module1Assignment1.2-RUBRIC.docx**
…
9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspe…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction
/Thesis
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
Quality of
Information
or Evidence
Weight:
%
25
/ 25
0
points
Weak or no in
–
troduction of
topic. Purpose
is
unclear/thesis
is weak or
missing.
7
points
Basic introduc
–
tion that states
topic but lacks
interest. Thesis
is somewhat
clear and
arguable.
8
points
Proficient in
–
troduction that
is interesting
and states
topic. Thesis is
clear and ar
–
guable state
–
ment of
position.
10
points
Exceptional in
–
troduction that
grabs interest
of reader and
states topic;
Thesis is ex
–
ceptionally
clear, arguable,
well-devel
–
oped, and a de
–
finitive
statement.
0
points
Information
has little or
nothing to do
with the thesis.
Information
has weak or no
connection to
the thesis.
17.5
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic, but
few details
and/or exam
–
ples are given.
Indicates a lim
–
ited variety of
sources.
20
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic.
Paper is re
–
searched in
sufficient detail
and from a va
–
riety of
sources. All
necessary con
–
tent is
included.
25
points
Paper is excep
–
tionally re
–
searched, ex
–
tremely de
–
tailed, and ac
–
curate.
Information
clearly relates
to the thesis.
Appropriate
content is cov
–
ered in depth
without being
redundant.
**Criterion Score**
Support of
Thesis/Anal
ysis Weight:
%
20
/ 20
Organizatio
n/
Developme
nt of Thesis
Weight:
15
%
/ 15
Conclusion
Weight: 5%
/ 5
0
points
Limited or no
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Lacks
analysis.
points
14
Some connec
–
tions have
been made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis, though
they may be
tenuous.
Minimal analy
–
sis is evident,
but may not
provide needed
support for
thesis.
16
points
Consistent
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Analysis
sufficiently
supports
thesis.
points
20
Exceptionally
critical, rele
–
vant, and con
–
sistent connec
–
tions made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis. Excellent
analysis is
evident.
0
points
Lacks develop
–
ment of ideas
with weak or
no transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
10.5
points
Somewhat
clear develop
–
ment, though
perhaps illogi
–
cal, with basic
transitions be
–
tween and
within
paragraphs.
12
points
Clear and logi
–
cal order that
supports thesis
with appropri
–
ate transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
points
15
Exceptionally
clear, logical,
mature, and
thorough de
–
velopment of
thesis with ex
–
cellent transi
–
tions between
and within
paragraphs.
points
0
Lacks a sum
–
mary of topic.
Conclusions
missing or
irrelevant.
3.5
points
Basic summary
of topic with
–
out final con
–
cluding ideas.
Inappropriately
introduces new
information.
4
points
Good summary
of topic with
credible con
–
cluding ideas.
Introduces no
new
information.
points
5
Excellent sum
–
mary of topic
with succinct
and precise
concluding
ideas that im
–
pact reader.
**Criterion Score**
Quality of
Written
Communica
tion Weight:
15
%
/ 15
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate
or do not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Word choice is
excessively re
–
dundant,
clichéd, and
unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, punctua
–
tion, and para
–
graphing.
Surface errors
are pervasive
enough that
they impede
communication
of meaning.
points
10.5
Style and voice
are somewhat
appropriate to
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
often unspe
–
cific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
12
Style and voice
are appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is spe
–
cific and pur
–
poseful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting to
the reader.
Correct sen
–
tence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are
used.
points
15
Style and voice
are not only
appropriate to
the given audi
–
ence and pur
–
pose, but also
show original
–
ity and creativ
–
ity. Word
choice is spe
–
cific, purpose
–
ful, dynamic
and varied.
Free of me
–
chanical and
typographical
errors. A vari
–
ety of sentence
structures and
effective fig
–
ures of speech
are used.
Writer is
clearly in com
–
mand of stan
–
dard, written,
academic
English.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
APA Format
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
APA format
and style are
not evident.
7
points
Missing APA el
–
ements; in-text
citations,
where neces
–
sary, are used
but formatted
inaccurately
and not
referenced.
8
points
All key ele
–
ments of an
APA title page
are present; In-
text citations
and a reference
page are
present with
few format er
–
rors.
Mechanics of
writing are re
–
flective of APA
style.
points
10
A broad under
–
standing of
APA format
and style is evi
–
dent. Accurate
citations and
references are
presented. No
APA errors are
evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
1/4
**## module1.2assignmnet.docx**
**Assignment Description:**
**Prevention Health Campaign Essay**
Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with
**at least four (4) sources in your essay**. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay.
**The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.**
For this week’s assignment, please use the following instructions:
· Go to your State Public Health Department website and identify one primary prevention health campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in your state of residence.
· Once you have identified one primary prevention health campaign, share in one to two succinct paragraphs the findings and outcomes of the campaign.
· In addition, please describe the challenges and/or opportunities evidenced in this campaign.
· Furthermore, list the formative and summative evaluation methods to determine the efficacy or ineffectiveness of the campaign.
· Lastly, identify and discuss at least two approaches that would enhance the implementation of the campaign. For example, you may discuss how including an Advisory Board to guide the implementation of the campaign may enhance programmatic and/or operational outcomes.
**Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.**
1. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.
2. The following specifications are required for this assignment:
3. Length: 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
4. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.
5. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at
**least four (4) scholarly sources to** support your claims.
6.
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**Learning Materials**
**References**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 1.
**Additional**
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015).
_Priorities of the_
_National Quality Strategy_.
[http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html](http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html)
Kulbok, P. A., Thatcher, E., Park, E., & Meszaros, P. S. (2012). Evolving
Public Health Nursing Roles: Focus on Community Participatory Health Promotion and Prevention.
_The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17._ [https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/](https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_
_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module1Assignment1.2-RUBRIC.docx**
…
9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspe…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction
/Thesis
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
Quality of
Information
or Evidence
Weight:
%
25
/ 25
0
points
Weak or no in
–
troduction of
topic. Purpose
is
unclear/thesis
is weak or
missing.
7
points
Basic introduc
–
tion that states
topic but lacks
interest. Thesis
is somewhat
clear and
arguable.
8
points
Proficient in
–
troduction that
is interesting
and states
topic. Thesis is
clear and ar
–
guable state
–
ment of
position.
10
points
Exceptional in
–
troduction that
grabs interest
of reader and
states topic;
Thesis is ex
–
ceptionally
clear, arguable,
well-devel
–
oped, and a de
–
finitive
statement.
0
points
Information
has little or
nothing to do
with the thesis.
Information
has weak or no
connection to
the thesis.
17.5
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic, but
few details
and/or exam
–
ples are given.
Indicates a lim
–
ited variety of
sources.
20
points
Information re
–
lates to the
main topic.
Paper is re
–
searched in
sufficient detail
and from a va
–
riety of
sources. All
necessary con
–
tent is
included.
25
points
Paper is excep
–
tionally re
–
searched, ex
–
tremely de
–
tailed, and ac
–
curate.
Information
clearly relates
to the thesis.
Appropriate
content is cov
–
ered in depth
without being
redundant.
**Criterion Score**
Support of
Thesis/Anal
ysis Weight:
%
20
/ 20
Organizatio
n/
Developme
nt of Thesis
Weight:
15
%
/ 15
Conclusion
Weight: 5%
/ 5
0
points
Limited or no
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Lacks
analysis.
points
14
Some connec
–
tions have
been made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis, though
they may be
tenuous.
Minimal analy
–
sis is evident,
but may not
provide needed
support for
thesis.
16
points
Consistent
connections
made between
evidence and
thesis. Analysis
sufficiently
supports
thesis.
points
20
Exceptionally
critical, rele
–
vant, and con
–
sistent connec
–
tions made be
–
tween evi
–
dence and the
–
sis. Excellent
analysis is
evident.
0
points
Lacks develop
–
ment of ideas
with weak or
no transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
10.5
points
Somewhat
clear develop
–
ment, though
perhaps illogi
–
cal, with basic
transitions be
–
tween and
within
paragraphs.
12
points
Clear and logi
–
cal order that
supports thesis
with appropri
–
ate transitions
between and
within
paragraphs.
points
15
Exceptionally
clear, logical,
mature, and
thorough de
–
velopment of
thesis with ex
–
cellent transi
–
tions between
and within
paragraphs.
points
0
Lacks a sum
–
mary of topic.
Conclusions
missing or
irrelevant.
3.5
points
Basic summary
of topic with
–
out final con
–
cluding ideas.
Inappropriately
introduces new
information.
4
points
Good summary
of topic with
credible con
–
cluding ideas.
Introduces no
new
information.
points
5
Excellent sum
–
mary of topic
with succinct
and precise
concluding
ideas that im
–
pact reader.
**Criterion Score**
Quality of
Written
Communica
tion Weight:
15
%
/ 15
0
points
Style and voice
inappropriate
or do not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Word choice is
excessively re
–
dundant,
clichéd, and
unspecific.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, punctua
–
tion, and para
–
graphing.
Surface errors
are pervasive
enough that
they impede
communication
of meaning.
points
10.5
Style and voice
are somewhat
appropriate to
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
often unspe
–
cific, generic,
redundant, and
clichéd.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
12
Style and voice
are appropriate
to the given
audience and
purpose. Word
choice is spe
–
cific and pur
–
poseful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting to
the reader.
Correct sen
–
tence structure
and audience-
appropriate
language are
used.
points
15
Style and voice
are not only
appropriate to
the given audi
–
ence and pur
–
pose, but also
show original
–
ity and creativ
–
ity. Word
choice is spe
–
cific, purpose
–
ful, dynamic
and varied.
Free of me
–
chanical and
typographical
errors. A vari
–
ety of sentence
structures and
effective fig
–
ures of speech
are used.
Writer is
clearly in com
–
mand of stan
–
dard, written,
academic
English.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
APA Format
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
APA format
and style are
not evident.
7
points
Missing APA el
–
ements; in-text
citations,
where neces
–
sary, are used
but formatted
inaccurately
and not
referenced.
8
points
All key ele
–
ments of an
APA title page
are present; In-
text citations
and a reference
page are
present with
few format er
–
rors.
Mechanics of
writing are re
–
flective of APA
style.
points
10
A broad under
–
standing of
APA format
and style is evi
–
dent. Accurate
citations and
references are
presented. No
APA errors are
evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4
1/4