Category: Reading Analysis

  • [Solved] ACADEMIC POSTER

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a one-page academic poster or infographic to showcase your research. Offer a comparison of the two characteristics you chose, using the research you completed during your previous Research Diary Log assignments. Explain the results of your research and conclude with a proposal for how the tw…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a one-page academic poster or infographic to showcase your research. Offer a comparison of the two characteristics you chose, using the research you completed during your previous Research Diary Log assignments. Explain the results of your research and conclude with a proposal for how the two characteristics can be uniquely and meaningfully connected.

    Your poster or infographic should include headings, a brief description of your research findings, and tables or charts when appropriate. Posters should also include effective use of color, images, and clear fonts.

    The poster or infographic must include:

    1. Title
    2. An introduction of the two Profile characteristics
    3. Explanation and discussion of Profile Characteristic Number 1
    4. Explanation and discussion of Profile Characteristic Number 2
    5. Conclusion connecting the two Profile characteristics
    6. References list

    The poster may be developed using Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, or other creative and graphic applications, but **must be saved and submitted as a .PDF file**. Images of posters made by hand are not permitted.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Reading homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Class4Ass4.docx – ## Assignment3311.docx **## Class4Ass4.docx** HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include: · An explanation of the diagnosis. · The research question you developed using …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Class4Ass4.docx

    – ## Assignment3311.docx

    **## Class4Ass4.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    ·
    Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

    **## Class4Ass4.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    ·
    Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

    **## Class4Ass4.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    ·
    Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Oil 530 wk 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## OGL530WK1.docx – TraditionalandCriticalTheory-1.pdf **## OGL530WK1.docx** **OGL 530 WK 1** **Module 1: Collaborative Annotation (Horkheimer)** The purpose of this assignment is for us to teach and learn from one other through a process of collaboratively annotating s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## OGL530WK1.docx

    – TraditionalandCriticalTheory-1.pdf

    **## OGL530WK1.docx**

    **OGL 530 WK 1**

    **Module 1: Collaborative Annotation (Horkheimer)**

    The purpose of this assignment is for us to teach and learn from one other through a process of collaboratively annotating some of the required texts for each Module.  Before beginning this assignment, it is important to note that all readings will also be duplicated in the “Learning Materials” section of the Module, however your annotations will be done through the “Collaborative Annotation” assignment in the Module.

    To begin the assignment, click on the embedded link below to open the software (Perusall) in another tab, where you will be directed to the article your small group will review. These review assignments are also noted in the “Required Reading” section of the “Learning Materials” in each Module.

    Inside the software, you will see a pdf copy of the reading and, if you are not the first to arrive, you may see your group members existing embedded comments. Since the purpose of this assignment is to do
    _collaborative reading_, you are expected both to (a) add your own original comments and questions (which can also include embedded hyperlinks to outside materials and videos) and to (b) return during the process to reply to one another. Your
    **goals** in annotating each reading assignment are
    _to stimulate discussion by posting good questions or comments_ and
    _to help others by answering their questions_. To help you connect with classmates, you can “mention” a classmate or the instructor in a comment or question to have them notified by email (they’ll also see a notification immediately if online), and you’ll also be notified when your classmates respond to your questions.

    If you need additional support learning the software, please see the section on Perusall in Module 0, or just ask me!

    **Grading scale**

    For each collaborative annotation assignment, I will only evaluate the annotations you submit before the assignment deadline. Based on the overall body of your annotations, you will receive a score for each assignment as follows:

    **High Engagement (40 points)**

    · Demonstrates exceptionally thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment

    · Contributes at least 5-6 substantive original comments distributed throughout the entire text

    · Engages actively with at least 3 meaningful replies to peers' comments

    · Returns to the discussion at least twice throughout the week (not just a single session)

    **Moderate Engagement (30 points)**

    · Demonstrates thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment

    · Contributes 3-4 original comments across most sections of the text

    · Provides at least 1-2 meaningful replies to peers' comments

    · Shows evidence of returning to the discussion more than once

    **Low Engagement (10 points)**

    · Demonstrates superficial reading of the entire assignment OR thoughtful reading of only part of the assignment

    · Contributes 1-2 original comments, possibly concentrated in one area

    · Provides 0-1 replies to peers' comments

    · May have completed annotations in primarily one sitting

    **No/Minimal Engagement (0 points)**

    · Demonstrates superficial reading of only part of the assignment

    · Fewer than 1 substantive original comment

    · No meaningful engagement with peers' comments

    · Comments do not demonstrate understanding of the material

    _Note: While these thresholds provide clear guidelines, quality remains essential. Comments should be substantive and demonstrate engagement with the text. Simple comments like "I agree" or "Good point" without further elaboration do not count toward the thresholds._

    **TraditionalandCriticalTheory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/traditionalandcriticaltheory-1-pdf)

    **TraditionalandCriticalTheory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/traditionalandcriticaltheory-1-pdf)

    **## OGL530WK1.docx**

    **OGL 530 WK 1**

    **Module 1: Collaborative Annotation (Horkheimer)**

    The purpose of this assignment is for us to teach and learn from one other through a process of collaboratively annotating some of the required texts for each Module.  Before beginning this assignment, it is important to note that all readings will also be duplicated in the “Learning Materials” section of the Module, however your annotations will be done through the “Collaborative Annotation” assignment in the Module.

    To begin the assignment, click on the embedded link below to open the software (Perusall) in another tab, where you will be directed to the article your small group will review. These review assignments are also noted in the “Required Reading” section of the “Learning Materials” in each Module.

    Inside the software, you will see a pdf copy of the reading and, if you are not the first to arrive, you may see your group members existing embedded comments. Since the purpose of this assignment is to do
    _collaborative reading_, you are expected both to (a) add your own original comments and questions (which can also include embedded hyperlinks to outside materials and videos) and to (b) return during the process to reply to one another. Your
    **goals** in annotating each reading assignment are
    _to stimulate discussion by posting good questions or comments_ and
    _to help others by answering their questions_. To help you connect with classmates, you can “mention” a classmate or the instructor in a comment or question to have them notified by email (they’ll also see a notification immediately if online), and you’ll also be notified when your classmates respond to your questions.

    If you need additional support learning the software, please see the section on Perusall in Module 0, or just ask me!

    **Grading scale**

    For each collaborative annotation assignment, I will only evaluate the annotations you submit before the assignment deadline. Based on the overall body of your annotations, you will receive a score for each assignment as follows:

    **High Engagement (40 points)**

    · Demonstrates exceptionally thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment

    · Contributes at least 5-6 substantive original comments distributed throughout the entire text

    · Engages actively with at least 3 meaningful replies to peers' comments

    · Returns to the discussion at least twice throughout the week (not just a single session)

    **Moderate Engagement (30 points)**

    · Demonstrates thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment

    · Contributes 3-4 original comments across most sections of the text

    · Provides at least 1-2 meaningful replies to peers' comments

    · Shows evidence of returning to the discussion more than once

    **Low Engagement (10 points)**

    · Demonstrates superficial reading of the entire assignment OR thoughtful reading of only part of the assignment

    · Contributes 1-2 original comments, possibly concentrated in one area

    · Provides 0-1 replies to peers' comments

    · May have completed annotations in primarily one sitting

    **No/Minimal Engagement (0 points)**

    · Demonstrates superficial reading of only part of the assignment

    · Fewer than 1 substantive original comment

    · No meaningful engagement with peers' comments

    · Comments do not demonstrate understanding of the material

    _Note: While these thresholds provide clear guidelines, quality remains essential. Comments should be substantive and demonstrate engagement with the text. Simple comments like "I agree" or "Good point" without further elaboration do not count toward the thresholds._

    **TraditionalandCriticalTheory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/traditionalandcriticaltheory-1-pdf)

    **## OGL530WK1.docx**

    **OGL 530 WK 1**

    **Module 1: Collaborative Annotation (Horkheimer)**

    The purpose of this assignment is for us to teach and learn from one other through a process of collaboratively annotating some of the required texts for each Module.  Before beginning this assignment, it is important to note that all readings will also be duplicated in the “Learning Materials” section of the Module, however your annotations will be done through the “Collaborative Annotation” assignment in the Module.

    To begin the assignment, click on the embedded link below to open the software (Perusall) in another tab, where you will be directed to the article your small group will review. These review assignments are also noted in the “Required Reading” section of the “Learning Materials” in each Module.

    Inside the software, you will see a pdf copy of the reading and, if you are not the first to arrive, you may see your group members existing embedded comments. Since the purpose of this assignment is to do
    _collaborative reading_, you are expected both to (a) add your own original comments and questions (which can also include embedded hyperlinks to outside materials and videos) and to (b) return during the process to reply to one another. Your
    **goals** in annotating each reading assignment are
    _to stimulate discussion by posting good questions or comments_ and
    _to help others by answering their questions_. To help you connect with classmates, you can “mention” a classmate or the instructor in a comment or question to have them notified by email (they’ll also see a notification immediately if online), and you’ll also be notified when your classmates respond to your questions.

    If you need additional support learning the software, please see the section on Perusall in Module 0, or just ask me!

    **Grading scale**

    For each collaborative annotation assignment, I will only evaluate the annotations you submit before the assignment deadline. Based on the overall body of your annotations, you will receive a score for each assignment as follows:

    **High Engagement (40 points)**

    · Demonstrates exceptionally thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment

    · Contributes at least 5-6 substantive original comments distributed throughout the entire text

    · Engages actively with at least 3 meaningful replies to peers' comments

    · Returns to the discussion at least twice throughout the week (not just a single session)

    **Moderate Engagement (30 points)**

    · Demonstrates thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment

    · Contributes 3-4 original comments across most sections of the text

    · Provides at least 1-2 meaningful replies to peers' comments

    · Shows evidence of returning to the discussion more than once

    **Low Engagement (10 points)**

    · Demonstrates superficial reading of the entire assignment OR thoughtful reading of only part of the assignment

    · Contributes 1-2 original comments, possibly concentrated in one area

    · Provides 0-1 replies to peers' comments

    · May have completed annotations in primarily one sitting

    **No/Minimal Engagement (0 points)**

    · Demonstrates superficial reading of only part of the assignment

    · Fewer than 1 substantive original comment

    · No meaningful engagement with peers' comments

    · Comments do not demonstrate understanding of the material

    _Note: While these thresholds provide clear guidelines, quality remains essential. Comments should be substantive and demonstrate engagement with the text. Simple comments like "I agree" or "Good point" without further elaboration do not count toward the thresholds._

    **TraditionalandCriticalTheory-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/traditionalandcriticaltheory-1-pdf)

  • [Solved] argumentative

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Pre.docx **## Pre.docx** Pre-argument: Arguments about Race READ those four articles. Two from Week 1 and two articles from Week 2, and based on those articles, write an easy and short argumentative essay in 4 to 5 paragraphs in elementary words based on ONE issue ad…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Pre.docx

    **## Pre.docx**

    Pre-argument: Arguments about Race

    READ those four articles. Two from Week 1 and two articles from Week 2, and based on those articles, write an easy and short argumentative essay in 4 to 5 paragraphs in elementary words based on ONE issue addressed in the argument. Highlight your thesis and make sure to give it a title. Please cite the articles.

    WEEK 1 ARTICLES

    https://medium.com/@hotdogday/teach-me-how-to-speak-18ce9fd143e

    [https://www.thecut.com/2015/05/can-fieldston-un-teach-racism.html](https://www.thecut.com/2015/05/can-fieldston-un-teach-racism.html)

    WEEK 2 ARTICLES

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/17/opinions/to-be-an-asian-woman-in-america-ho/index.html

    [https://latino.ucla.edu/research/latino-is-not-a-race/](https://latino.ucla.edu/research/latino-is-not-a-race/)

    **## Pre.docx**

    Pre-argument: Arguments about Race

    READ those four articles. Two from Week 1 and two articles from Week 2, and based on those articles, write an easy and short argumentative essay in 4 to 5 paragraphs in elementary words based on ONE issue addressed in the argument. Highlight your thesis and make sure to give it a title. Please cite the articles.

    WEEK 1 ARTICLES

    https://medium.com/@hotdogday/teach-me-how-to-speak-18ce9fd143e

    [https://www.thecut.com/2015/05/can-fieldston-un-teach-racism.html](https://www.thecut.com/2015/05/can-fieldston-un-teach-racism.html)

    WEEK 2 ARTICLES

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/17/opinions/to-be-an-asian-woman-in-america-ho/index.html

    [https://latino.ucla.edu/research/latino-is-not-a-race/](https://latino.ucla.edu/research/latino-is-not-a-race/)

  • [Solved] discussion post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    need a discussion post – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    need a discussion post

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] abzi

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering abzi.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion Thread: Jurisdiction

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Do you believe that the civil government has the authority to regulate the actions of athletes during the course of their activities of their respective sports? **Topic:** We live in a country where laws, especially criminal laws, are being passed at an alarming rate. Further, the issue of over crim…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Do you believe that the civil government has the authority to regulate the actions of athletes during the course of their activities of their respective sports?

    **Topic:** We live in a country where laws, especially criminal laws, are being passed at an alarming rate. Further, the issue of over criminalization has been debated amongst legislators at both the state and federal levels. Often, the laws passed by legislators in our civil government do not fully reach the athletes in the course of their individual activities on the court, field, ice, etc. There has been much discussion as to the proper balance between these two spheres of authority.

    at least 200 words. He student must support his/her assertions with at least two (2) scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five (5) years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, etc.

    BOOK: Sharp, Moorman, & Claussen: Chapter 14 (Pages 464-480)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] research

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    help with sampling methods – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    help with sampling methods

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.