My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Nursing Dnp Essentials

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    CLO 1: Analyze the AACN DNP Essentials within the context of providing the highest quality population health. CLO 2: Evaluate the evolution, past, present, and future of the role expectations of a competent doctoral prepared nurse within a diverse, global environment. CLO 3: Explore clinical and lea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    CLO 1: Analyze the AACN DNP Essentials within the context of providing the highest quality population health.

    CLO 2: Evaluate the evolution, past, present, and future of the role expectations of a competent doctoral prepared nurse within a diverse, global environment.

    CLO 3: Explore clinical and leadership opportunities of an advanced practice nurse with interprofessional collaboration.

    **Requirements**

    This assignment is a narrated presentation file (i.e., PowerPoint or Prezi).

    use up to 15 references with at least 10 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov.

    Rubrics to use- power point should contain an exemplary discussion of the chosen essential and the significance of this essential to the impact of the DNP on the quality, safety, efficiency, and cost effectiveness of healthcare for individuals and/or populations. There is excellent use of high-quality research evidence to support contentions.

    There should be an exemplary discussion of the need for and impact of interprofessional collaboration related to the selected essential. There is excellent use of high-quality research evidence to support contentions.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] microscopy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe a clinical or research scenario that requires the use of a microscope. What microscope is the best choice for your scenario and why? What would be your second choice? – Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial and 1 follow-up) – Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings OR Concepts/edapt and an ou…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe a clinical or research scenario that requires the use of a microscope. What microscope is the best choice for your scenario and why? What would be your second choice?

    – Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial and 1 follow-up)
    – Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings OR Concepts/edapt and an outside scholarly source)
    – APA format for in-text citations and list of references

    – [\
    \
    BIOS242_Weekly_Discussion_Rubric.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bios242-weekly-discussion-rubric-docx "BIOS242_Weekly_Discussion_Rubric.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Lou-Asssignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**TOPIC: LUNG CANCER**_ **Introduction** – Brief overview of adult health – Introduce the disease condition chosen – Importance of understanding the condition **Presentation of Condition** – Describe the condition chosen and its pathophysiology. – What signs/symptoms can be found in the patient? – …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**TOPIC: LUNG CANCER**_

    **Introduction**

    – Brief overview of adult health
    – Introduce the disease condition chosen
    – Importance of understanding the condition

    **Presentation of Condition**

    – Describe the condition chosen and its pathophysiology.
    – What signs/symptoms can be found in the patient?
    – Identify if presentation variations can be based on culture, race, ethnicity, age, etc.

    **Diagnosis of Condition**

    – Diagnostic testing (including imaging, labs, and other necessary evaluations based on condition)
    – Clinical evaluation via medical history and physical examination

    **Treatment of Condition**

    – Medications
    – Treatments
    – Managing symptoms (if needed)
    – Non-pharmacological treatments (if applicable)

    **Potential Health Risks if Left Untreated**

    – Physical and mental health risks

    **Recent Evidence-Based Advancements in Condition**

    – Choose one evidence-based treatment shown to improve the condition within the last 5 years.
    – Briefly summarize the treatment and results.

    **Conclusion**

    – Recap points discussed in the paper
    – Importance of management and early diagnosis (if applicable)

    REQUIREMENTS:

    APA format, 7th edition

    NO PLAGIO MORE THAN 10%

    DUE DATE MARCH 6, 2024

    REFERENCES NO OLDER THAN 5 YEARS

    CHECK SPELLING AND GRAMMAR, MUST BE ACCORDING UNIVERSITY LEVEL

    ADD CITATIONS

    3 PAGES

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] XDASSess01

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## assessment.docx – ## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx – ## XD3001_Rubric.pdf **## assessment.docx** **ASSESSMENT** Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. [Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/cont…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## assessment.docx

    – ## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx

    – ## XD3001_Rubric.pdf

    **## assessment.docx**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.

    [Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.

    · Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.

    · Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.

    **Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**

    · Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.

    · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.

    **Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**

    · Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.

    · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.

    · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.

    · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.

    · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    **Note:** Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.

    **Complete and Submit.**

    **## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx**

    **Analyzing Personal Bias**

    Student Name Here

    RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University

    Course:
    Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    XD3001:
    _Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect_

    Instructor Name

    Month, Day, Year

    (Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)

    Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.

    **Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**

    · Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.

    · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.

    **Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**

    · Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.

    · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.

    · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.

    · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.

    · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    **Note:** Do not include
    introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.

    **References**

    **Note:** You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 3

    **image1.png**

    **## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
    impacts relationships and communication with team members.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain your understanding of
    the foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
    concepts of diversity, equity, and
    inclusion

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    Response adequately
    explains individual
    understanding of the
    foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and
    inclusion.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    • Explain how you define the
    concepts of advantage and
    disadvantage in the context of
    cultural differences.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Define

    concepts of advantage and

    disadvantage in the context of culture

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response adequately
    explains definitions of
    the concepts of
    advantage and
    disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    • Describe a situation when you

    responded to differences in

    others with a sense of

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of

    Response adequately
    explains factors that
    contribute to perceptions
    of advantage or

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of advantage

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    advantage or disadvantage.

    Explain the factors that

    contributed to that perception.

    Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
    that influence perceptions of
    advantage or disadvantage in
    situations with others

    advantage or
    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    or disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to differences
    in others.

    Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare

    Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Summarize insights you gained

    from your Project Implicit Test

    results.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
    insights from results of personal bias
    tests

    Response does not
    adequately summarize
    insights from Project
    Implicit Test results.

    Response adequately
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    • Analyze how your personal
    biases and values influence your
    thinking and behavior. Be
    specific with examples.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
    influence of individual biases and
    values on thinking and behavior

    Response does not
    adequately analyze with
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response adequately
    analyzes with specific
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly analyzes
    with specific examples
    how personal biases and
    values influence thinking
    and behavior.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe a situation when you
    communicated with others in a
    biased way or experienced
    communication that was biased.
    Apply your understanding of
    personal bias to explain this
    example.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
    understanding of personal bias to
    examples of biased communication

    Response does not
    adequately describe a
    situation when
    communication was
    biased and/or
    adequately apply
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response adequately
    describes a situation
    when communication
    was biased and
    adequately applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly describes
    a situation when
    communication was
    biased and accurately
    and thoroughly applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    • Explain your thoughts and
    feelings about the value of
    examining your personal
    biases—both as an individual
    and as a professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
    value of examining personal biases as
    an individual and healthcare
    professional

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response adequately
    explains thoughts and
    feelings about the value
    of examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe at least two (2)
    strategies for combatting implicit
    bias that you would choose for
    yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    Note: Do not include
    introspection as a strategy,
    which you have applied and
    summarized through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
    strategies to combat implicit bias

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and/or
    includes introspection as
    a strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response adequately
    explains the individual
    choice of at least two (2)
    strategies to apply for
    combatting implicit bias
    and does not include
    introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and does not
    include introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

    **## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
    impacts relationships and communication with team members.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain your understanding of
    the foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
    concepts of diversity, equity, and
    inclusion

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    Response adequately
    explains individual
    understanding of the
    foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and
    inclusion.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    • Explain how you define the
    concepts of advantage and
    disadvantage in the context of
    cultural differences.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Define

    concepts of advantage and

    disadvantage in the context of culture

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response adequately
    explains definitions of
    the concepts of
    advantage and
    disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    • Describe a situation when you

    responded to differences in

    others with a sense of

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of

    Response adequately
    explains factors that
    contribute to perceptions
    of advantage or

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of advantage

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    advantage or disadvantage.

    Explain the factors that

    contributed to that perception.

    Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
    that influence perceptions of
    advantage or disadvantage in
    situations with others

    advantage or
    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    or disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to differences
    in others.

    Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare

    Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Summarize insights you gained

    from your Project Implicit Test

    results.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
    insights from results of personal bias
    tests

    Response does not
    adequately summarize
    insights from Project
    Implicit Test results.

    Response adequately
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    • Analyze how your personal
    biases and values influence your
    thinking and behavior. Be
    specific with examples.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
    influence of individual biases and
    values on thinking and behavior

    Response does not
    adequately analyze with
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response adequately
    analyzes with specific
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly analyzes
    with specific examples
    how personal biases and
    values influence thinking
    and behavior.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe a situation when you
    communicated with others in a
    biased way or experienced
    communication that was biased.
    Apply your understanding of
    personal bias to explain this
    example.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
    understanding of personal bias to
    examples of biased communication

    Response does not
    adequately describe a
    situation when
    communication was
    biased and/or
    adequately apply
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response adequately
    describes a situation
    when communication
    was biased and
    adequately applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly describes
    a situation when
    communication was
    biased and accurately
    and thoroughly applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    • Explain your thoughts and
    feelings about the value of
    examining your personal
    biases—both as an individual
    and as a professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
    value of examining personal biases as
    an individual and healthcare
    professional

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response adequately
    explains thoughts and
    feelings about the value
    of examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe at least two (2)
    strategies for combatting implicit
    bias that you would choose for
    yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    Note: Do not include
    introspection as a strategy,
    which you have applied and
    summarized through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
    strategies to combat implicit bias

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and/or
    includes introspection as
    a strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response adequately
    explains the individual
    choice of at least two (2)
    strategies to apply for
    combatting implicit bias
    and does not include
    introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and does not
    include introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

    **## assessment.docx**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.

    [Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.

    · Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.

    · Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.

    **Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**

    · Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.

    · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.

    **Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**

    · Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.

    · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.

    · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.

    · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.

    · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    **Note:** Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.

    **Complete and Submit.**

    **## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx**

    **Analyzing Personal Bias**

    Student Name Here

    RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University

    Course:
    Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    XD3001:
    _Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect_

    Instructor Name

    Month, Day, Year

    (Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)

    Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.

    **Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**

    · Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.

    · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.

    **Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**

    · Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.

    · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.

    · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.

    · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.

    · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    **Note:** Do not include
    introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.

    **References**

    **Note:** You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 3

    **image1.png**

    **## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
    impacts relationships and communication with team members.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain your understanding of
    the foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
    concepts of diversity, equity, and
    inclusion

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    Response adequately
    explains individual
    understanding of the
    foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and
    inclusion.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    • Explain how you define the
    concepts of advantage and
    disadvantage in the context of
    cultural differences.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Define

    concepts of advantage and

    disadvantage in the context of culture

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response adequately
    explains definitions of
    the concepts of
    advantage and
    disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    • Describe a situation when you

    responded to differences in

    others with a sense of

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of

    Response adequately
    explains factors that
    contribute to perceptions
    of advantage or

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of advantage

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    advantage or disadvantage.

    Explain the factors that

    contributed to that perception.

    Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
    that influence perceptions of
    advantage or disadvantage in
    situations with others

    advantage or
    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    or disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to differences
    in others.

    Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare

    Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Summarize insights you gained

    from your Project Implicit Test

    results.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
    insights from results of personal bias
    tests

    Response does not
    adequately summarize
    insights from Project
    Implicit Test results.

    Response adequately
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    • Analyze how your personal
    biases and values influence your
    thinking and behavior. Be
    specific with examples.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
    influence of individual biases and
    values on thinking and behavior

    Response does not
    adequately analyze with
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response adequately
    analyzes with specific
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly analyzes
    with specific examples
    how personal biases and
    values influence thinking
    and behavior.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe a situation when you
    communicated with others in a
    biased way or experienced
    communication that was biased.
    Apply your understanding of
    personal bias to explain this
    example.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
    understanding of personal bias to
    examples of biased communication

    Response does not
    adequately describe a
    situation when
    communication was
    biased and/or
    adequately apply
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response adequately
    describes a situation
    when communication
    was biased and
    adequately applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly describes
    a situation when
    communication was
    biased and accurately
    and thoroughly applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    • Explain your thoughts and
    feelings about the value of
    examining your personal
    biases—both as an individual
    and as a professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
    value of examining personal biases as
    an individual and healthcare
    professional

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response adequately
    explains thoughts and
    feelings about the value
    of examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe at least two (2)
    strategies for combatting implicit
    bias that you would choose for
    yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    Note: Do not include
    introspection as a strategy,
    which you have applied and
    summarized through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
    strategies to combat implicit bias

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and/or
    includes introspection as
    a strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response adequately
    explains the individual
    choice of at least two (2)
    strategies to apply for
    combatting implicit bias
    and does not include
    introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and does not
    include introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

    **## assessment.docx**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.

    [Analyzing Personal Bias](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.

    · Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.

    · Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309714-XD3001/Assessment.html)

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.

    **Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**

    · Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.

    · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.

    **Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**

    · Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.

    · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.

    · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.

    · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.

    · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    **Note:** Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.

    **Complete and Submit.**

    **## XD3001_AnalyzingPersonalBias_Template.docx**

    **Analyzing Personal Bias**

    Student Name Here

    RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University

    Course:
    Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    XD3001:
    _Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect_

    Instructor Name

    Month, Day, Year

    (Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)

    Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.

    **Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts**

    · Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.

    · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.

    **Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias**

    · Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.

    · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.

    · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.

    · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.

    · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    **Note:** Do not include
    introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.

    **References**

    **Note:** You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 3

    **image1.png**

    **## XD3001_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases
    impacts relationships and communication with team members.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare

    Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain your understanding of
    the foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain
    concepts of diversity, equity, and
    inclusion

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    Response adequately
    explains individual
    understanding of the
    foundational concepts of
    diversity, equity, and
    inclusion.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    individual understanding
    of the foundational
    concepts of diversity,
    equity, and inclusion.

    • Explain how you define the
    concepts of advantage and
    disadvantage in the context of
    cultural differences.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Define

    concepts of advantage and

    disadvantage in the context of culture

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response adequately
    explains definitions of
    the concepts of
    advantage and
    disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    definitions of the
    concepts of advantage
    and disadvantage in the
    context of cultural
    differences.

    • Describe a situation when you

    responded to differences in

    others with a sense of

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of

    Response adequately
    explains factors that
    contribute to perceptions
    of advantage or

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains
    factors that contribute to
    perceptions of advantage

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    advantage or disadvantage.

    Explain the factors that

    contributed to that perception.

    Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors
    that influence perceptions of
    advantage or disadvantage in
    situations with others

    advantage or
    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to
    differences in others.

    or disadvantage in a
    situation that involved
    responding to differences
    in others.

    Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare

    Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias

    Using the Analyzing Personal Bias
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Summarize insights you gained

    from your Project Implicit Test

    results.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize
    insights from results of personal bias
    tests

    Response does not
    adequately summarize
    insights from Project
    Implicit Test results.

    Response adequately
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    summarizes insights
    from Project Implicit Test
    results.

    • Analyze how your personal
    biases and values influence your
    thinking and behavior. Be
    specific with examples.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the
    influence of individual biases and
    values on thinking and behavior

    Response does not
    adequately analyze with
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response adequately
    analyzes with specific
    examples how personal
    biases and values
    influence thinking and
    behavior.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly analyzes
    with specific examples
    how personal biases and
    values influence thinking
    and behavior.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe a situation when you
    communicated with others in a
    biased way or experienced
    communication that was biased.
    Apply your understanding of
    personal bias to explain this
    example.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Apply
    understanding of personal bias to
    examples of biased communication

    Response does not
    adequately describe a
    situation when
    communication was
    biased and/or
    adequately apply
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response adequately
    describes a situation
    when communication
    was biased and
    adequately applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly describes
    a situation when
    communication was
    biased and accurately
    and thoroughly applies
    understanding of
    personal bias to explain
    the example.

    • Explain your thoughts and
    feelings about the value of
    examining your personal
    biases—both as an individual
    and as a professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the
    value of examining personal biases as
    an individual and healthcare
    professional

    Response does not
    adequately explain
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response adequately
    explains thoughts and
    feelings about the value
    of examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    thoughts and feelings
    about the value of
    examining personal
    biases—both as an
    individual and as a
    professional in the
    healthcare field.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    • Describe at least two (2)
    strategies for combatting implicit
    bias that you would choose for
    yourself. Explain your reasoning.
    Note: Do not include
    introspection as a strategy,
    which you have applied and
    summarized through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Learning Objective 2.5: Describe
    strategies to combat implicit bias

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and/or
    includes introspection as
    a strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response adequately
    explains the individual
    choice of at least two (2)
    strategies to apply for
    combatting implicit bias
    and does not include
    introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    individual choice of at
    least two (2) strategies to
    apply for combatting
    implicit bias and does not
    include introspection as a
    strategy, which was
    applied and summarized
    through the Implicit
    Association Tests.

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing: Content minimally or does Content demonstrates Content clearly

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

  • [Solved] XD03assess

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## GuidelinesforCreatingaPodcast.docx – ## Assessment.docx **## GuidelinesforCreatingaPodcast.docx** **Guidelines for Creating a Podcast** This Competency Assessment requires submission of three (3) files: • Podcast Planning template document (Word file) • Podcast Recor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## GuidelinesforCreatingaPodcast.docx

    – ## Assessment.docx

    **## GuidelinesforCreatingaPodcast.docx**

    **Guidelines for Creating a Podcast**

    This Competency Assessment requires submission of three (3) files:

    • Podcast Planning template document (Word file)

    • Podcast Recording (audio or video file of 5–7 minutes in length)

    • Podcast Transcript (text file) Review the following guidelines for the steps in creating your podcast.

    Step 1: Podcast Planning Planning is key to a successful podcast. The Podcast Planning template document will support this process and enable you to demonstrate for the Competency Assessment the learning and thought you put into preparing for your podcast interview. Review and complete the following requirements.

    Identify a Professional to Interview Choose your expert based on the following requirements. The individual is:

    • A member of your specific healthcare field, or someone who can speak with authority to your field

    • Recognized within your facility, community, region, or beyond as an expert on the topics of principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice

    • Available to meet in person or to be recorded remotely within your time period for completing this Competency. Important Note: An interview via email, text, or social media is not accepted.

    Prepare a brief profile of the professional to support your selection and for introducing the individual on your podcast.

    Note: When you contact the expert to request the interview, be sure to confirm the following:

    1. Date, time, and approximate length of the interview

    2. How the interview will be conducted—in person or via remote connection

    3. Permission granted by the expert for an audio or video recording of the interview, which will be submitted to your instructor.

    Set the Interview Purpose Think ahead to the primary purpose of your interview. For example, you might mainly aim to inform or persuade your audience of the need to integrate social justice and human rights into practice. Or you might aim to provide concrete strategies for doing so. Use your understanding of needs in your healthcare field to help determine your purpose.

    Investigate the Interview Topics As the podcast interviewer, you want to have a solid background on the topics you will discuss with your expert. The Learning Resources provided for this Competency support developing your understanding of core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. The Podcast Planning template document will guide you with questions for demonstrating your understanding of key topics in preparation for the podcast interview.

    Develop Your interview Questions Draw on the knowledge you have gained on the topics of principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice to identify three to five (3–5) questions to ask the expert. Keep these tips in mind: 1. Draft questions that support your interview purpose.

    2. Frame open-ended questions—such as how and why questions—to encourage detailed answers.

    3. Add follow-up questions that will invite the expert to dig deeper into a topic with more details.

    Note: You may choose to share your questions in advance with the expert. However, discourage your expert from scripting answers, to avoid long monologues and promote a conversation between the two of you. Instead, recommend preparing by creating a bulleted list of talking points.

    In advance, estimate how much time to allot for each portion of the podcast to meet your 5- to 7-minute goal. Time your portions of the podcast for an idea of how many minutes you will have for your expert’s responses. For example:

    • Welcome listeners.

    • Explain the main theme of the podcast.

    • Provide a brief introduction and professional bio of your expert guest.

    • Ask the first question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Ask a follow-up to the first question or ask the second question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Ask a follow-up question or ask the third question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Continue with additional questions and responses as you have time.

    • Wrap up by thanking your guest.

    Note: Be sure to ask your most important questions first to ensure they are addressed in your interview.

    **## Assessment.docx**

    **Assessment**

    [Podcast Interview on Social Justice and Human Rights in Specific Healthcare Fields](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency Assessment, you will explore principles of the professional–patient relationship that support social justice and human rights in the field of healthcare in which the you work (e.g., nutrition, respiratory health, nursing, social work, counseling).

    You will complete a Podcast Planning document to develop your background knowledge on core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Your preparation is for an interview with a professional (whom you will select) to speak expertly on these topics as they apply to your specific field. This interview will be the basis of a podcast you will create for a potential audience of colleagues in your field.

    **Note:** Only your Instructor will review the podcast for this Competency Assessment.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Podcast Planning template document, which you will complete as one of three submissions for this Competency Assessment.

    · Access and review the Guidelines for Creating a Podcast PDF document.

    · As you follow the podcast guidelines, keep these requirements in mind:

    · Select an expert in your healthcare facility or another facility or institution to interview for the podcast. Be sure the individual knows the purpose of the podcast and formally agrees to be recorded.

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key open-ended questions, plus follow-up questions, to ask your expert. Research to ensure you are prepared to discuss key topics. The Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources and questions in the Podcast Planning template document will help you develop knowledge of the topics and prepare your questions.

    · Set ground rules with the expert, such as agreement on sharing questions in advance; posing follow-up questions; and taking a conversational tone to inform and interest an audience.

    · Plan your interview to meet the podcast length of 5–7 minutes. A sample script outline is included in the guidelines.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    Follow the three steps below to create the three required submissions for your Competency Assessment.

    **Step 1:** Using the Podcast Planning template document, address the following:

    **Podcast Planning: Part 1—Identify Your Expert and Interview Purpose**

    · Identify an expert in your healthcare field to interview for a podcast on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Provide a brief profile of the expert to justify your choice.

    · Explain the purpose of your podcast interview (i.e., to inform, persuade, or provide how-to strategies) and your reasoning.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 2—Investigate Interview Topics: Examining Principles of Professional–Patient Relationships**

    · Explain principles of professional–patient relationships that guide your work as a healthcare professional. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Explain one (1) or more principles you would follow to lead a healthcare team to meet the needs of diverse patients. Include how you would persuade others to follow your lead.

    · Explain your concept of the therapeutic relationship in healthcare practice.

    · Explain how more attention to specific principles of professional-patient relationships can enhance a positive therapeutic relationship or convert a negative relationship into a positive one. Provide examples.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 3—Investigate Interview Topics: Integrating Social Justice and Human Rights Into Practice**

    · How can DEI advocacy work both for and against social justice and human rights? Include an example with particular meaning to you.

    · In places where there is resistance to DEI, how can healthcare professionals in your field work around those restrictions? Explain a strategy you have read or your own idea.

    · Explain your concept of positive change to improve social justice and human rights in healthcare.

    · Explain two (2) SMART goals for affecting positive change in your community, institution, and/or workplace that improves healthcare practice. Include steps you can take toward meeting your goals.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 4—Develop Interview Questions and Key Takeaways**

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key questions to ask your expert (identified in Part 1) that align with the purpose of your podcast (identified in Part 1) on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice.

    · Draft at least one (1) follow-up question on key topics for more details from the expert or to expand on a topic.

    · Identify at least two (2) key takeaways that you aim for listeners to gain from the podcast interview. Explain your thinking.

    **Step 2:** Record the podcast interview of 5–7 minutes in length.

    **Step 3:** Create a transcript of the podcast to comply with ADA guidelines.

    **## Assessment.docx**

    **Assessment**

    [Podcast Interview on Social Justice and Human Rights in Specific Healthcare Fields](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency Assessment, you will explore principles of the professional–patient relationship that support social justice and human rights in the field of healthcare in which the you work (e.g., nutrition, respiratory health, nursing, social work, counseling).

    You will complete a Podcast Planning document to develop your background knowledge on core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Your preparation is for an interview with a professional (whom you will select) to speak expertly on these topics as they apply to your specific field. This interview will be the basis of a podcast you will create for a potential audience of colleagues in your field.

    **Note:** Only your Instructor will review the podcast for this Competency Assessment.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Podcast Planning template document, which you will complete as one of three submissions for this Competency Assessment.

    · Access and review the Guidelines for Creating a Podcast PDF document.

    · As you follow the podcast guidelines, keep these requirements in mind:

    · Select an expert in your healthcare facility or another facility or institution to interview for the podcast. Be sure the individual knows the purpose of the podcast and formally agrees to be recorded.

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key open-ended questions, plus follow-up questions, to ask your expert. Research to ensure you are prepared to discuss key topics. The Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources and questions in the Podcast Planning template document will help you develop knowledge of the topics and prepare your questions.

    · Set ground rules with the expert, such as agreement on sharing questions in advance; posing follow-up questions; and taking a conversational tone to inform and interest an audience.

    · Plan your interview to meet the podcast length of 5–7 minutes. A sample script outline is included in the guidelines.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    Follow the three steps below to create the three required submissions for your Competency Assessment.

    **Step 1:** Using the Podcast Planning template document, address the following:

    **Podcast Planning: Part 1—Identify Your Expert and Interview Purpose**

    · Identify an expert in your healthcare field to interview for a podcast on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Provide a brief profile of the expert to justify your choice.

    · Explain the purpose of your podcast interview (i.e., to inform, persuade, or provide how-to strategies) and your reasoning.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 2—Investigate Interview Topics: Examining Principles of Professional–Patient Relationships**

    · Explain principles of professional–patient relationships that guide your work as a healthcare professional. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Explain one (1) or more principles you would follow to lead a healthcare team to meet the needs of diverse patients. Include how you would persuade others to follow your lead.

    · Explain your concept of the therapeutic relationship in healthcare practice.

    · Explain how more attention to specific principles of professional-patient relationships can enhance a positive therapeutic relationship or convert a negative relationship into a positive one. Provide examples.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 3—Investigate Interview Topics: Integrating Social Justice and Human Rights Into Practice**

    · How can DEI advocacy work both for and against social justice and human rights? Include an example with particular meaning to you.

    · In places where there is resistance to DEI, how can healthcare professionals in your field work around those restrictions? Explain a strategy you have read or your own idea.

    · Explain your concept of positive change to improve social justice and human rights in healthcare.

    · Explain two (2) SMART goals for affecting positive change in your community, institution, and/or workplace that improves healthcare practice. Include steps you can take toward meeting your goals.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 4—Develop Interview Questions and Key Takeaways**

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key questions to ask your expert (identified in Part 1) that align with the purpose of your podcast (identified in Part 1) on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice.

    · Draft at least one (1) follow-up question on key topics for more details from the expert or to expand on a topic.

    · Identify at least two (2) key takeaways that you aim for listeners to gain from the podcast interview. Explain your thinking.

    **Step 2:** Record the podcast interview of 5–7 minutes in length.

    **Step 3:** Create a transcript of the podcast to comply with ADA guidelines.

    **## GuidelinesforCreatingaPodcast.docx**

    **Guidelines for Creating a Podcast**

    This Competency Assessment requires submission of three (3) files:

    • Podcast Planning template document (Word file)

    • Podcast Recording (audio or video file of 5–7 minutes in length)

    • Podcast Transcript (text file) Review the following guidelines for the steps in creating your podcast.

    Step 1: Podcast Planning Planning is key to a successful podcast. The Podcast Planning template document will support this process and enable you to demonstrate for the Competency Assessment the learning and thought you put into preparing for your podcast interview. Review and complete the following requirements.

    Identify a Professional to Interview Choose your expert based on the following requirements. The individual is:

    • A member of your specific healthcare field, or someone who can speak with authority to your field

    • Recognized within your facility, community, region, or beyond as an expert on the topics of principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice

    • Available to meet in person or to be recorded remotely within your time period for completing this Competency. Important Note: An interview via email, text, or social media is not accepted.

    Prepare a brief profile of the professional to support your selection and for introducing the individual on your podcast.

    Note: When you contact the expert to request the interview, be sure to confirm the following:

    1. Date, time, and approximate length of the interview

    2. How the interview will be conducted—in person or via remote connection

    3. Permission granted by the expert for an audio or video recording of the interview, which will be submitted to your instructor.

    Set the Interview Purpose Think ahead to the primary purpose of your interview. For example, you might mainly aim to inform or persuade your audience of the need to integrate social justice and human rights into practice. Or you might aim to provide concrete strategies for doing so. Use your understanding of needs in your healthcare field to help determine your purpose.

    Investigate the Interview Topics As the podcast interviewer, you want to have a solid background on the topics you will discuss with your expert. The Learning Resources provided for this Competency support developing your understanding of core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. The Podcast Planning template document will guide you with questions for demonstrating your understanding of key topics in preparation for the podcast interview.

    Develop Your interview Questions Draw on the knowledge you have gained on the topics of principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice to identify three to five (3–5) questions to ask the expert. Keep these tips in mind: 1. Draft questions that support your interview purpose.

    2. Frame open-ended questions—such as how and why questions—to encourage detailed answers.

    3. Add follow-up questions that will invite the expert to dig deeper into a topic with more details.

    Note: You may choose to share your questions in advance with the expert. However, discourage your expert from scripting answers, to avoid long monologues and promote a conversation between the two of you. Instead, recommend preparing by creating a bulleted list of talking points.

    In advance, estimate how much time to allot for each portion of the podcast to meet your 5- to 7-minute goal. Time your portions of the podcast for an idea of how many minutes you will have for your expert’s responses. For example:

    • Welcome listeners.

    • Explain the main theme of the podcast.

    • Provide a brief introduction and professional bio of your expert guest.

    • Ask the first question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Ask a follow-up to the first question or ask the second question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Ask a follow-up question or ask the third question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Continue with additional questions and responses as you have time.

    • Wrap up by thanking your guest.

    Note: Be sure to ask your most important questions first to ensure they are addressed in your interview.

    **## Assessment.docx**

    **Assessment**

    [Podcast Interview on Social Justice and Human Rights in Specific Healthcare Fields](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency Assessment, you will explore principles of the professional–patient relationship that support social justice and human rights in the field of healthcare in which the you work (e.g., nutrition, respiratory health, nursing, social work, counseling).

    You will complete a Podcast Planning document to develop your background knowledge on core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Your preparation is for an interview with a professional (whom you will select) to speak expertly on these topics as they apply to your specific field. This interview will be the basis of a podcast you will create for a potential audience of colleagues in your field.

    **Note:** Only your Instructor will review the podcast for this Competency Assessment.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Podcast Planning template document, which you will complete as one of three submissions for this Competency Assessment.

    · Access and review the Guidelines for Creating a Podcast PDF document.

    · As you follow the podcast guidelines, keep these requirements in mind:

    · Select an expert in your healthcare facility or another facility or institution to interview for the podcast. Be sure the individual knows the purpose of the podcast and formally agrees to be recorded.

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key open-ended questions, plus follow-up questions, to ask your expert. Research to ensure you are prepared to discuss key topics. The Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources and questions in the Podcast Planning template document will help you develop knowledge of the topics and prepare your questions.

    · Set ground rules with the expert, such as agreement on sharing questions in advance; posing follow-up questions; and taking a conversational tone to inform and interest an audience.

    · Plan your interview to meet the podcast length of 5–7 minutes. A sample script outline is included in the guidelines.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    Follow the three steps below to create the three required submissions for your Competency Assessment.

    **Step 1:** Using the Podcast Planning template document, address the following:

    **Podcast Planning: Part 1—Identify Your Expert and Interview Purpose**

    · Identify an expert in your healthcare field to interview for a podcast on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Provide a brief profile of the expert to justify your choice.

    · Explain the purpose of your podcast interview (i.e., to inform, persuade, or provide how-to strategies) and your reasoning.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 2—Investigate Interview Topics: Examining Principles of Professional–Patient Relationships**

    · Explain principles of professional–patient relationships that guide your work as a healthcare professional. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Explain one (1) or more principles you would follow to lead a healthcare team to meet the needs of diverse patients. Include how you would persuade others to follow your lead.

    · Explain your concept of the therapeutic relationship in healthcare practice.

    · Explain how more attention to specific principles of professional-patient relationships can enhance a positive therapeutic relationship or convert a negative relationship into a positive one. Provide examples.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 3—Investigate Interview Topics: Integrating Social Justice and Human Rights Into Practice**

    · How can DEI advocacy work both for and against social justice and human rights? Include an example with particular meaning to you.

    · In places where there is resistance to DEI, how can healthcare professionals in your field work around those restrictions? Explain a strategy you have read or your own idea.

    · Explain your concept of positive change to improve social justice and human rights in healthcare.

    · Explain two (2) SMART goals for affecting positive change in your community, institution, and/or workplace that improves healthcare practice. Include steps you can take toward meeting your goals.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 4—Develop Interview Questions and Key Takeaways**

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key questions to ask your expert (identified in Part 1) that align with the purpose of your podcast (identified in Part 1) on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice.

    · Draft at least one (1) follow-up question on key topics for more details from the expert or to expand on a topic.

    · Identify at least two (2) key takeaways that you aim for listeners to gain from the podcast interview. Explain your thinking.

    **Step 2:** Record the podcast interview of 5–7 minutes in length.

    **Step 3:** Create a transcript of the podcast to comply with ADA guidelines.

    **## GuidelinesforCreatingaPodcast.docx**

    **Guidelines for Creating a Podcast**

    This Competency Assessment requires submission of three (3) files:

    • Podcast Planning template document (Word file)

    • Podcast Recording (audio or video file of 5–7 minutes in length)

    • Podcast Transcript (text file) Review the following guidelines for the steps in creating your podcast.

    Step 1: Podcast Planning Planning is key to a successful podcast. The Podcast Planning template document will support this process and enable you to demonstrate for the Competency Assessment the learning and thought you put into preparing for your podcast interview. Review and complete the following requirements.

    Identify a Professional to Interview Choose your expert based on the following requirements. The individual is:

    • A member of your specific healthcare field, or someone who can speak with authority to your field

    • Recognized within your facility, community, region, or beyond as an expert on the topics of principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice

    • Available to meet in person or to be recorded remotely within your time period for completing this Competency. Important Note: An interview via email, text, or social media is not accepted.

    Prepare a brief profile of the professional to support your selection and for introducing the individual on your podcast.

    Note: When you contact the expert to request the interview, be sure to confirm the following:

    1. Date, time, and approximate length of the interview

    2. How the interview will be conducted—in person or via remote connection

    3. Permission granted by the expert for an audio or video recording of the interview, which will be submitted to your instructor.

    Set the Interview Purpose Think ahead to the primary purpose of your interview. For example, you might mainly aim to inform or persuade your audience of the need to integrate social justice and human rights into practice. Or you might aim to provide concrete strategies for doing so. Use your understanding of needs in your healthcare field to help determine your purpose.

    Investigate the Interview Topics As the podcast interviewer, you want to have a solid background on the topics you will discuss with your expert. The Learning Resources provided for this Competency support developing your understanding of core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. The Podcast Planning template document will guide you with questions for demonstrating your understanding of key topics in preparation for the podcast interview.

    Develop Your interview Questions Draw on the knowledge you have gained on the topics of principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice to identify three to five (3–5) questions to ask the expert. Keep these tips in mind: 1. Draft questions that support your interview purpose.

    2. Frame open-ended questions—such as how and why questions—to encourage detailed answers.

    3. Add follow-up questions that will invite the expert to dig deeper into a topic with more details.

    Note: You may choose to share your questions in advance with the expert. However, discourage your expert from scripting answers, to avoid long monologues and promote a conversation between the two of you. Instead, recommend preparing by creating a bulleted list of talking points.

    In advance, estimate how much time to allot for each portion of the podcast to meet your 5- to 7-minute goal. Time your portions of the podcast for an idea of how many minutes you will have for your expert’s responses. For example:

    • Welcome listeners.

    • Explain the main theme of the podcast.

    • Provide a brief introduction and professional bio of your expert guest.

    • Ask the first question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Ask a follow-up to the first question or ask the second question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Ask a follow-up question or ask the third question.

    • Expert responds.

    • Continue with additional questions and responses as you have time.

    • Wrap up by thanking your guest.

    Note: Be sure to ask your most important questions first to ensure they are addressed in your interview.

    **## Assessment.docx**

    **Assessment**

    [Podcast Interview on Social Justice and Human Rights in Specific Healthcare Fields](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    In this Competency Assessment, you will explore principles of the professional–patient relationship that support social justice and human rights in the field of healthcare in which the you work (e.g., nutrition, respiratory health, nursing, social work, counseling).

    You will complete a Podcast Planning document to develop your background knowledge on core principles of professional–patient relationships for integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Your preparation is for an interview with a professional (whom you will select) to speak expertly on these topics as they apply to your specific field. This interview will be the basis of a podcast you will create for a potential audience of colleagues in your field.

    **Note:** Only your Instructor will review the podcast for this Competency Assessment.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Access the Podcast Planning template document, which you will complete as one of three submissions for this Competency Assessment.

    · Access and review the Guidelines for Creating a Podcast PDF document.

    · As you follow the podcast guidelines, keep these requirements in mind:

    · Select an expert in your healthcare facility or another facility or institution to interview for the podcast. Be sure the individual knows the purpose of the podcast and formally agrees to be recorded.

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key open-ended questions, plus follow-up questions, to ask your expert. Research to ensure you are prepared to discuss key topics. The Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources and questions in the Podcast Planning template document will help you develop knowledge of the topics and prepare your questions.

    · Set ground rules with the expert, such as agreement on sharing questions in advance; posing follow-up questions; and taking a conversational tone to inform and interest an audience.

    · Plan your interview to meet the podcast length of 5–7 minutes. A sample script outline is included in the guidelines.

    [To Complete the Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309749-XD3003/Assessment.html)

    Follow the three steps below to create the three required submissions for your Competency Assessment.

    **Step 1:** Using the Podcast Planning template document, address the following:

    **Podcast Planning: Part 1—Identify Your Expert and Interview Purpose**

    · Identify an expert in your healthcare field to interview for a podcast on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice. Provide a brief profile of the expert to justify your choice.

    · Explain the purpose of your podcast interview (i.e., to inform, persuade, or provide how-to strategies) and your reasoning.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 2—Investigate Interview Topics: Examining Principles of Professional–Patient Relationships**

    · Explain principles of professional–patient relationships that guide your work as a healthcare professional. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Explain one (1) or more principles you would follow to lead a healthcare team to meet the needs of diverse patients. Include how you would persuade others to follow your lead.

    · Explain your concept of the therapeutic relationship in healthcare practice.

    · Explain how more attention to specific principles of professional-patient relationships can enhance a positive therapeutic relationship or convert a negative relationship into a positive one. Provide examples.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 3—Investigate Interview Topics: Integrating Social Justice and Human Rights Into Practice**

    · How can DEI advocacy work both for and against social justice and human rights? Include an example with particular meaning to you.

    · In places where there is resistance to DEI, how can healthcare professionals in your field work around those restrictions? Explain a strategy you have read or your own idea.

    · Explain your concept of positive change to improve social justice and human rights in healthcare.

    · Explain two (2) SMART goals for affecting positive change in your community, institution, and/or workplace that improves healthcare practice. Include steps you can take toward meeting your goals.

    **Podcast Planning: Part 4—Develop Interview Questions and Key Takeaways**

    · Develop three to five (3–5) key questions to ask your expert (identified in Part 1) that align with the purpose of your podcast (identified in Part 1) on core principles of professional–patient relationships that support integrating social justice and human rights into practice.

    · Draft at least one (1) follow-up question on key topics for more details from the expert or to expand on a topic.

    · Identify at least two (2) key takeaways that you aim for listeners to gain from the podcast interview. Explain your thinking.

    **Step 2:** Record the podcast interview of 5–7 minutes in length.

    **Step 3:** Create a transcript of the podcast to comply with ADA guidelines.

  • [Solved] XD03

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## APASTYLE.docx **## APASTYLE.docx** **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES** 1. How do you define a “principle of professional practice” in your healthcare field? Explain your thinking. 2. Looking at your healthcare field, is there greater need for attention to soc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## APASTYLE.docx

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES**

    1. How do you define a “principle of professional practice” in your healthcare field? Explain your thinking.

    2. Looking at your healthcare field, is there greater need for attention to social justice and human rights in professional practice? Explain your point of view.

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES**

    1. How do you define a “principle of professional practice” in your healthcare field? Explain your thinking.

    2. Looking at your healthcare field, is there greater need for attention to social justice and human rights in professional practice? Explain your point of view.

  • [Solved] XD02ASSess

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## ASSESSMENT.docx – ## XD3002_Rubric.pdf – XD3002_PowerPointPresentationTemplate.pptx **## ASSESSMENT.docx** **ASSESSMENT** [Professional Presentation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities in a Particular Population](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforce…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## ASSESSMENT.docx

    – ## XD3002_Rubric.pdf

    – XD3002_PowerPointPresentationTemplate.pptx

    **## ASSESSMENT.docx**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    [Professional Presentation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities in a Particular Population](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309763-XD3002/Assessment.html)

    For this Competency Assessment, you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation to educate professionals in your healthcare field on healthcare disparities experienced by vulnerable populations, with attention to one particular population that you choose and with interventions you recommend to address healthcare disparities and improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the outline of required content under “To Complete Your Competency Assessment.” Keep in mind that the purpose of your presentation is to educate fellow professionals in your particular healthcare field. You will begin with a general review of the social determinants of health, common healthcare disparities, and common causes of those disparities. Then, you will move to the example of a specific population to bring to the attention of your fellow professionals.

    · Identify the focus population. This may be a group in your community or region and/or a population of particular interest to your professional role. The focus population should be a vulnerable group based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s). Be sure to choose a population for which you can find reliable information.

    · Gather key data about the population to create a brief profile of this group.

    · Identify one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus population to address in your presentation. Concentrate on healthcare disparities that are having the greatest impact on this group and for which you can recommend interventions.

    · Explain causes of these healthcare disparities at the societal level, such as issues of economics, education, environment, and social views, including racism and other types of prejudice. Look for examples of the impact on the focus group in terms of patient/client experience and quality care.

    · Identify up to three (3) specific interventions that could reduce or remove one (1) or more of the major healthcare disparities for your focus population. Provide examples of how the interventions can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    · To promote advocacy, consider how to conclude your presentation with a call to fellow professionals to address healthcare disparities.

    · Access the PowerPoint template to prepare your presentation. Review the following resources for support in developing your presentation and adding audio narration:

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    _Microsoft PowerPoint_. Walden University.
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint)

    · Microsoft 365. (2021, January 26).
    _How to add audio in your PowerPoint presentation_ [Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI)

    ·
    **Note:** There is no specified time limit for your narrated presentation. However, keep your audience’s interest and attention in mind. Refer to the professional presentation skills in the rubric for guidance.

    [To Complete Your Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309763-XD3002/Assessment.html)

    Create a PowerPoint presentation of 9–11 slides with narration, plus title and reference slides, to include the following:

    · Explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

    · Describe common examples of healthcare disparities.

    · Describe societal influences that cause common healthcare disparities.

    · Identify a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity. Provide a brief profile of this group based on the social determinants of health.

    · Analyze causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

    · For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain the impact on patient/client experience and care.

    · For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain up to three (3) recommended interventions.

    · Explain how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    · Conclude with a call for advocacy to motivate your professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

    **Complete and Submit.**

    **## XD3002_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3002: Social Influences of Healthcare Disparities: Analyze societal factors that drive healthcare disparities across
    diverse groups.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Understanding Social Determinants of Health and Healthcare Disparities

    Part 1: Healthcare Disparities Impacting One Group

    Using the PowerPoint Presentation
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain how social determinants
    of health influence individual
    healthcare experiences and
    perspectives.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain how
    social determinants of health influence
    individual healthcare experiences and
    perspectives

    Response does not
    adequately explain how
    social determinants of
    health influence
    individual healthcare
    experiences and
    perspectives.

    Response adequately
    explains how social
    determinants of health
    influence individual
    healthcare experiences
    and perspectives.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    how social determinants
    of health influence
    individual healthcare
    experiences and
    perspectives.

    • Describe common examples
    of healthcare disparities.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Describe

    common healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately describe
    common examples of
    healthcare disparities.

    Response adequately
    describes common
    examples of healthcare
    disparities.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly describes
    common examples of
    healthcare disparities.

    • Describe societal influences that
    cause common healthcare
    disparities.

    Response does not
    adequately describe
    societal influences that
    cause common

    Response adequately
    describes societal
    influences that cause
    common healthcare

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly describes
    societal influences that
    cause common

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Learning Objective 1.3: Describe
    societal influences that cause
    healthcare disparities

    healthcare disparities.

    disparities.

    healthcare disparities.

    • Identify a specific vulnerable
    population—based on race,
    ethnicity, gender, sexuality,
    disability, or other determining
    factor(s)—who experiences
    healthcare disparity. Provide a
    brief profile of this group using
    the social determinants of health.

    Learning Objective 1.4: Describe
    vulnerable populations using the
    social determinants of health

    Response does not
    provide an adequate
    profile, using the social
    determinants of health,
    of a specific vulnerable
    population—based on
    race, ethnicity, gender,
    sexuality, disability, or
    other determining
    factor(s)—who
    experiences healthcare
    disparity.

    Response provides an
    adequate profile, using
    the social determinants
    of health, of a specific
    vulnerable population—
    based on race, ethnicity,
    gender, sexuality,
    disability, or other
    determining factor(s)—
    who experiences
    healthcare disparity.

    Response provides an
    accurate and thorough
    profile, using the social
    determinants of health, of
    a specific vulnerable
    population—based on
    race, ethnicity, gender,
    sexuality, disability, or
    other determining
    factor(s)—who
    experiences healthcare
    disparity.

    • Analyze causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare disparities
    experienced by the focus group.

    Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze
    specific populations for healthcare
    disparities and causes

    Response does not
    adequately analyze
    causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare
    disparities experienced
    by the focus group.

    Response adequately
    analyzes causes of one
    (1) or two (2) major
    healthcare disparities
    experienced by the focus
    group.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly analyzes
    causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare
    disparities experienced
    by the focus group.

    • For each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by the
    focus group, explain the impact
    on patient/client experience and
    care.

    Learning Objective 1.6: Analyze
    impacts of healthcare disparities on
    patient/client experience and care

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    impact on patient
    experience and care for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response adequately
    explains the impact on
    patient experience and
    care for each major
    healthcare disparity
    experienced by the focus
    group.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    impact on patient
    experience and care for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 2: Addressing Healthcare Disparities

    Part 2: Interventions to Address Healthcare Disparities

    Using the PowerPoint template
    document, address the following:

    • For each major healthcare

    disparity experienced by the
    focus group, explain up to three
    (3) recommended interventions.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Recommend
    interventions for healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately recommend
    up to three (3)
    interventions for each
    major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response adequately
    recommends up to three
    (3) interventions for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    recommends up to three
    (3) interventions for each
    major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    • Explain how the recommended
    intervention(s) can improve
    health equity and outcomes for
    the focus group.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Explain how
    interventions improve health equity
    and outcomes

    Response does not
    adequately explain how
    the recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    Response adequately
    explains how the
    recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    how the recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    • Conclude with a call for
    advocacy to motivate your
    professional audience to
    address healthcare disparities
    for other vulnerable populations.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Create a call
    for professional advocacy to address
    healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately provide a call
    for advocacy to motivate
    a professional audience
    to address healthcare
    disparities for other
    vulnerable populations.

    Response adequately
    provides a call for
    advocacy to motivate a
    professional audience to
    address healthcare
    disparities for other
    vulnerable populations.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly provides
    a call for advocacy to
    motivate a professional
    audience to address
    healthcare disparities for
    other vulnerable
    populations.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Presentation Skills

    Context, Organization,
    Audience, Purpose, Tone,
    Style, Clarity, Flow

    Does not use a professional
    tone appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content lacks
    clarity, logic, and/or
    discernible organization;
    does not use images, bullet
    points, and visual effects;
    contains long paragraphs or
    confusing sentences.

    Presenter is not engaging
    and professional; does not
    use proper voice, tone,
    volume, pace, and
    flow/speed.

    Presentation contains
    significant spelling,
    punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.

    Mostly uses a professional
    tone appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content is mostly
    clear, logical, and well-
    organized with adequate use
    of images, bullet points, and
    visual effects.

    Presenter is mostly engaging
    and professional, using
    adequate voice, tone, volume,
    pace, and flow/speed.

    Presentation contains few
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.

    Consistently uses a
    professional tone
    appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content is
    consistently clear,
    logical, and well-
    organized with
    appropriate use of
    images, bullet points,
    and visual effects.

    Presenter is
    consistently engaging
    and professional, using
    appropriate voice, tone,
    volume, pace, and
    flow/speed.

    Presentation is free of
    spelling, punctuation,
    and grammar/syntax
    errors.

    Originality, Source Presentation does not Presentation adequately Presentation fully

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    reflect original thought and
    paraphrasing and does not
    adhere to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim while
    incorporating appropriate
    citations and references in
    APA or another format.

    reflects original thought and
    paraphrasing and adheres to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim
    while incorporating appropriate
    citations and references in
    APA or another format.

    reflects original thought
    and paraphrasing and
    adheres to reference
    requirements, including
    the use of credible
    evidence to support a
    claim while incorporating
    appropriate citations and
    references in APA or
    another format.

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing:
    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    Content minimally or does
    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the

    Content demonstrates
    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the

    Content clearly
    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 6

    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

    **XD3002_PowerPointPresentationTemplate.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/xd3002-powerpointpresentationtemplate-pptx)

    **XD3002_PowerPointPresentationTemplate.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/xd3002-powerpointpresentationtemplate-pptx)

    **## ASSESSMENT.docx**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    [Professional Presentation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities in a Particular Population](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309763-XD3002/Assessment.html)

    For this Competency Assessment, you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation to educate professionals in your healthcare field on healthcare disparities experienced by vulnerable populations, with attention to one particular population that you choose and with interventions you recommend to address healthcare disparities and improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the outline of required content under “To Complete Your Competency Assessment.” Keep in mind that the purpose of your presentation is to educate fellow professionals in your particular healthcare field. You will begin with a general review of the social determinants of health, common healthcare disparities, and common causes of those disparities. Then, you will move to the example of a specific population to bring to the attention of your fellow professionals.

    · Identify the focus population. This may be a group in your community or region and/or a population of particular interest to your professional role. The focus population should be a vulnerable group based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s). Be sure to choose a population for which you can find reliable information.

    · Gather key data about the population to create a brief profile of this group.

    · Identify one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus population to address in your presentation. Concentrate on healthcare disparities that are having the greatest impact on this group and for which you can recommend interventions.

    · Explain causes of these healthcare disparities at the societal level, such as issues of economics, education, environment, and social views, including racism and other types of prejudice. Look for examples of the impact on the focus group in terms of patient/client experience and quality care.

    · Identify up to three (3) specific interventions that could reduce or remove one (1) or more of the major healthcare disparities for your focus population. Provide examples of how the interventions can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    · To promote advocacy, consider how to conclude your presentation with a call to fellow professionals to address healthcare disparities.

    · Access the PowerPoint template to prepare your presentation. Review the following resources for support in developing your presentation and adding audio narration:

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    _Microsoft PowerPoint_. Walden University.
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint)

    · Microsoft 365. (2021, January 26).
    _How to add audio in your PowerPoint presentation_ [Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI)

    ·
    **Note:** There is no specified time limit for your narrated presentation. However, keep your audience’s interest and attention in mind. Refer to the professional presentation skills in the rubric for guidance.

    [To Complete Your Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309763-XD3002/Assessment.html)

    Create a PowerPoint presentation of 9–11 slides with narration, plus title and reference slides, to include the following:

    · Explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

    · Describe common examples of healthcare disparities.

    · Describe societal influences that cause common healthcare disparities.

    · Identify a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity. Provide a brief profile of this group based on the social determinants of health.

    · Analyze causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

    · For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain the impact on patient/client experience and care.

    · For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain up to three (3) recommended interventions.

    · Explain how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    · Conclude with a call for advocacy to motivate your professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

    **Complete and Submit.**

    **## XD3002_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3002: Social Influences of Healthcare Disparities: Analyze societal factors that drive healthcare disparities across
    diverse groups.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Understanding Social Determinants of Health and Healthcare Disparities

    Part 1: Healthcare Disparities Impacting One Group

    Using the PowerPoint Presentation
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain how social determinants
    of health influence individual
    healthcare experiences and
    perspectives.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain how
    social determinants of health influence
    individual healthcare experiences and
    perspectives

    Response does not
    adequately explain how
    social determinants of
    health influence
    individual healthcare
    experiences and
    perspectives.

    Response adequately
    explains how social
    determinants of health
    influence individual
    healthcare experiences
    and perspectives.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    how social determinants
    of health influence
    individual healthcare
    experiences and
    perspectives.

    • Describe common examples
    of healthcare disparities.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Describe

    common healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately describe
    common examples of
    healthcare disparities.

    Response adequately
    describes common
    examples of healthcare
    disparities.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly describes
    common examples of
    healthcare disparities.

    • Describe societal influences that
    cause common healthcare
    disparities.

    Response does not
    adequately describe
    societal influences that
    cause common

    Response adequately
    describes societal
    influences that cause
    common healthcare

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly describes
    societal influences that
    cause common

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Learning Objective 1.3: Describe
    societal influences that cause
    healthcare disparities

    healthcare disparities.

    disparities.

    healthcare disparities.

    • Identify a specific vulnerable
    population—based on race,
    ethnicity, gender, sexuality,
    disability, or other determining
    factor(s)—who experiences
    healthcare disparity. Provide a
    brief profile of this group using
    the social determinants of health.

    Learning Objective 1.4: Describe
    vulnerable populations using the
    social determinants of health

    Response does not
    provide an adequate
    profile, using the social
    determinants of health,
    of a specific vulnerable
    population—based on
    race, ethnicity, gender,
    sexuality, disability, or
    other determining
    factor(s)—who
    experiences healthcare
    disparity.

    Response provides an
    adequate profile, using
    the social determinants
    of health, of a specific
    vulnerable population—
    based on race, ethnicity,
    gender, sexuality,
    disability, or other
    determining factor(s)—
    who experiences
    healthcare disparity.

    Response provides an
    accurate and thorough
    profile, using the social
    determinants of health, of
    a specific vulnerable
    population—based on
    race, ethnicity, gender,
    sexuality, disability, or
    other determining
    factor(s)—who
    experiences healthcare
    disparity.

    • Analyze causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare disparities
    experienced by the focus group.

    Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze
    specific populations for healthcare
    disparities and causes

    Response does not
    adequately analyze
    causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare
    disparities experienced
    by the focus group.

    Response adequately
    analyzes causes of one
    (1) or two (2) major
    healthcare disparities
    experienced by the focus
    group.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly analyzes
    causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare
    disparities experienced
    by the focus group.

    • For each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by the
    focus group, explain the impact
    on patient/client experience and
    care.

    Learning Objective 1.6: Analyze
    impacts of healthcare disparities on
    patient/client experience and care

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    impact on patient
    experience and care for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response adequately
    explains the impact on
    patient experience and
    care for each major
    healthcare disparity
    experienced by the focus
    group.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    impact on patient
    experience and care for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 2: Addressing Healthcare Disparities

    Part 2: Interventions to Address Healthcare Disparities

    Using the PowerPoint template
    document, address the following:

    • For each major healthcare

    disparity experienced by the
    focus group, explain up to three
    (3) recommended interventions.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Recommend
    interventions for healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately recommend
    up to three (3)
    interventions for each
    major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response adequately
    recommends up to three
    (3) interventions for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    recommends up to three
    (3) interventions for each
    major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    • Explain how the recommended
    intervention(s) can improve
    health equity and outcomes for
    the focus group.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Explain how
    interventions improve health equity
    and outcomes

    Response does not
    adequately explain how
    the recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    Response adequately
    explains how the
    recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    how the recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    • Conclude with a call for
    advocacy to motivate your
    professional audience to
    address healthcare disparities
    for other vulnerable populations.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Create a call
    for professional advocacy to address
    healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately provide a call
    for advocacy to motivate
    a professional audience
    to address healthcare
    disparities for other
    vulnerable populations.

    Response adequately
    provides a call for
    advocacy to motivate a
    professional audience to
    address healthcare
    disparities for other
    vulnerable populations.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly provides
    a call for advocacy to
    motivate a professional
    audience to address
    healthcare disparities for
    other vulnerable
    populations.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Presentation Skills

    Context, Organization,
    Audience, Purpose, Tone,
    Style, Clarity, Flow

    Does not use a professional
    tone appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content lacks
    clarity, logic, and/or
    discernible organization;
    does not use images, bullet
    points, and visual effects;
    contains long paragraphs or
    confusing sentences.

    Presenter is not engaging
    and professional; does not
    use proper voice, tone,
    volume, pace, and
    flow/speed.

    Presentation contains
    significant spelling,
    punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.

    Mostly uses a professional
    tone appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content is mostly
    clear, logical, and well-
    organized with adequate use
    of images, bullet points, and
    visual effects.

    Presenter is mostly engaging
    and professional, using
    adequate voice, tone, volume,
    pace, and flow/speed.

    Presentation contains few
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.

    Consistently uses a
    professional tone
    appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content is
    consistently clear,
    logical, and well-
    organized with
    appropriate use of
    images, bullet points,
    and visual effects.

    Presenter is
    consistently engaging
    and professional, using
    appropriate voice, tone,
    volume, pace, and
    flow/speed.

    Presentation is free of
    spelling, punctuation,
    and grammar/syntax
    errors.

    Originality, Source Presentation does not Presentation adequately Presentation fully

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    reflect original thought and
    paraphrasing and does not
    adhere to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim while
    incorporating appropriate
    citations and references in
    APA or another format.

    reflects original thought and
    paraphrasing and adheres to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim
    while incorporating appropriate
    citations and references in
    APA or another format.

    reflects original thought
    and paraphrasing and
    adheres to reference
    requirements, including
    the use of credible
    evidence to support a
    claim while incorporating
    appropriate citations and
    references in APA or
    another format.

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing:
    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    Content minimally or does
    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the

    Content demonstrates
    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the

    Content clearly
    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 6

    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

    **XD3002_PowerPointPresentationTemplate.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/xd3002-powerpointpresentationtemplate-pptx)

    **## ASSESSMENT.docx**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    [Professional Presentation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities in a Particular Population](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309763-XD3002/Assessment.html)

    For this Competency Assessment, you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation to educate professionals in your healthcare field on healthcare disparities experienced by vulnerable populations, with attention to one particular population that you choose and with interventions you recommend to address healthcare disparities and improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the outline of required content under “To Complete Your Competency Assessment.” Keep in mind that the purpose of your presentation is to educate fellow professionals in your particular healthcare field. You will begin with a general review of the social determinants of health, common healthcare disparities, and common causes of those disparities. Then, you will move to the example of a specific population to bring to the attention of your fellow professionals.

    · Identify the focus population. This may be a group in your community or region and/or a population of particular interest to your professional role. The focus population should be a vulnerable group based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s). Be sure to choose a population for which you can find reliable information.

    · Gather key data about the population to create a brief profile of this group.

    · Identify one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus population to address in your presentation. Concentrate on healthcare disparities that are having the greatest impact on this group and for which you can recommend interventions.

    · Explain causes of these healthcare disparities at the societal level, such as issues of economics, education, environment, and social views, including racism and other types of prejudice. Look for examples of the impact on the focus group in terms of patient/client experience and quality care.

    · Identify up to three (3) specific interventions that could reduce or remove one (1) or more of the major healthcare disparities for your focus population. Provide examples of how the interventions can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    · To promote advocacy, consider how to conclude your presentation with a call to fellow professionals to address healthcare disparities.

    · Access the PowerPoint template to prepare your presentation. Review the following resources for support in developing your presentation and adding audio narration:

    · OASIS. (n.d.).
    _Microsoft PowerPoint_. Walden University.
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint)

    · Microsoft 365. (2021, January 26).
    _How to add audio in your PowerPoint presentation_ [Video]. YouTube.
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI)

    ·
    **Note:** There is no specified time limit for your narrated presentation. However, keep your audience’s interest and attention in mind. Refer to the professional presentation skills in the rubric for guidance.

    [To Complete Your Competency Assessment](https://tempolearning.brightspace.com/content/enforced/309763-XD3002/Assessment.html)

    Create a PowerPoint presentation of 9–11 slides with narration, plus title and reference slides, to include the following:

    · Explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

    · Describe common examples of healthcare disparities.

    · Describe societal influences that cause common healthcare disparities.

    · Identify a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity. Provide a brief profile of this group based on the social determinants of health.

    · Analyze causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

    · For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain the impact on patient/client experience and care.

    · For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain up to three (3) recommended interventions.

    · Explain how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

    · Conclude with a call for advocacy to motivate your professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

    **Complete and Submit.**

    **## XD3002_Rubric.pdf**

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 1

    XD3002: Social Influences of Healthcare Disparities: Analyze societal factors that drive healthcare disparities across
    diverse groups.

    Assessment Rubric

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 1: Understanding Social Determinants of Health and Healthcare Disparities

    Part 1: Healthcare Disparities Impacting One Group

    Using the PowerPoint Presentation
    template document, address the
    following:

    • Explain how social determinants
    of health influence individual
    healthcare experiences and
    perspectives.

    Learning Objective 1.1: Explain how
    social determinants of health influence
    individual healthcare experiences and
    perspectives

    Response does not
    adequately explain how
    social determinants of
    health influence
    individual healthcare
    experiences and
    perspectives.

    Response adequately
    explains how social
    determinants of health
    influence individual
    healthcare experiences
    and perspectives.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    how social determinants
    of health influence
    individual healthcare
    experiences and
    perspectives.

    • Describe common examples
    of healthcare disparities.

    Learning Objective 1.2: Describe

    common healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately describe
    common examples of
    healthcare disparities.

    Response adequately
    describes common
    examples of healthcare
    disparities.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly describes
    common examples of
    healthcare disparities.

    • Describe societal influences that
    cause common healthcare
    disparities.

    Response does not
    adequately describe
    societal influences that
    cause common

    Response adequately
    describes societal
    influences that cause
    common healthcare

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly describes
    societal influences that
    cause common

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 2

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Learning Objective 1.3: Describe
    societal influences that cause
    healthcare disparities

    healthcare disparities.

    disparities.

    healthcare disparities.

    • Identify a specific vulnerable
    population—based on race,
    ethnicity, gender, sexuality,
    disability, or other determining
    factor(s)—who experiences
    healthcare disparity. Provide a
    brief profile of this group using
    the social determinants of health.

    Learning Objective 1.4: Describe
    vulnerable populations using the
    social determinants of health

    Response does not
    provide an adequate
    profile, using the social
    determinants of health,
    of a specific vulnerable
    population—based on
    race, ethnicity, gender,
    sexuality, disability, or
    other determining
    factor(s)—who
    experiences healthcare
    disparity.

    Response provides an
    adequate profile, using
    the social determinants
    of health, of a specific
    vulnerable population—
    based on race, ethnicity,
    gender, sexuality,
    disability, or other
    determining factor(s)—
    who experiences
    healthcare disparity.

    Response provides an
    accurate and thorough
    profile, using the social
    determinants of health, of
    a specific vulnerable
    population—based on
    race, ethnicity, gender,
    sexuality, disability, or
    other determining
    factor(s)—who
    experiences healthcare
    disparity.

    • Analyze causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare disparities
    experienced by the focus group.

    Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze
    specific populations for healthcare
    disparities and causes

    Response does not
    adequately analyze
    causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare
    disparities experienced
    by the focus group.

    Response adequately
    analyzes causes of one
    (1) or two (2) major
    healthcare disparities
    experienced by the focus
    group.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly analyzes
    causes of one (1) or two
    (2) major healthcare
    disparities experienced
    by the focus group.

    • For each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by the
    focus group, explain the impact
    on patient/client experience and
    care.

    Learning Objective 1.6: Analyze
    impacts of healthcare disparities on
    patient/client experience and care

    Response does not
    adequately explain the
    impact on patient
    experience and care for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response adequately
    explains the impact on
    patient experience and
    care for each major
    healthcare disparity
    experienced by the focus
    group.

    Response accurately and
    thoroughly explains the
    impact on patient
    experience and care for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 3

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    Module 2: Addressing Healthcare Disparities

    Part 2: Interventions to Address Healthcare Disparities

    Using the PowerPoint template
    document, address the following:

    • For each major healthcare

    disparity experienced by the
    focus group, explain up to three
    (3) recommended interventions.

    Learning Objective 2.1: Recommend
    interventions for healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately recommend
    up to three (3)
    interventions for each
    major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response adequately
    recommends up to three
    (3) interventions for
    each major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly
    recommends up to three
    (3) interventions for each
    major healthcare
    disparity experienced by
    the focus group.

    • Explain how the recommended
    intervention(s) can improve
    health equity and outcomes for
    the focus group.

    Learning Objective 2.2: Explain how
    interventions improve health equity
    and outcomes

    Response does not
    adequately explain how
    the recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    Response adequately
    explains how the
    recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly explains
    how the recommended
    intervention(s) can
    improve health equity
    and outcomes for the
    focus group.

    • Conclude with a call for
    advocacy to motivate your
    professional audience to
    address healthcare disparities
    for other vulnerable populations.

    Learning Objective 2.3: Create a call
    for professional advocacy to address
    healthcare disparities

    Response does not
    adequately provide a call
    for advocacy to motivate
    a professional audience
    to address healthcare
    disparities for other
    vulnerable populations.

    Response adequately
    provides a call for
    advocacy to motivate a
    professional audience to
    address healthcare
    disparities for other
    vulnerable populations.

    Response accurately
    and thoroughly provides
    a call for advocacy to
    motivate a professional
    audience to address
    healthcare disparities for
    other vulnerable
    populations.

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 4

    Professional Skills Assessment

    Professional Presentation Skills

    Context, Organization,
    Audience, Purpose, Tone,
    Style, Clarity, Flow

    Does not use a professional
    tone appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content lacks
    clarity, logic, and/or
    discernible organization;
    does not use images, bullet
    points, and visual effects;
    contains long paragraphs or
    confusing sentences.

    Presenter is not engaging
    and professional; does not
    use proper voice, tone,
    volume, pace, and
    flow/speed.

    Presentation contains
    significant spelling,
    punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.

    Mostly uses a professional
    tone appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content is mostly
    clear, logical, and well-
    organized with adequate use
    of images, bullet points, and
    visual effects.

    Presenter is mostly engaging
    and professional, using
    adequate voice, tone, volume,
    pace, and flow/speed.

    Presentation contains few
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.

    Consistently uses a
    professional tone
    appropriate for the
    presentation context,
    audience, and purpose.

    Presentation content is
    consistently clear,
    logical, and well-
    organized with
    appropriate use of
    images, bullet points,
    and visual effects.

    Presenter is
    consistently engaging
    and professional, using
    appropriate voice, tone,
    volume, pace, and
    flow/speed.

    Presentation is free of
    spelling, punctuation,
    and grammar/syntax
    errors.

    Originality, Source Presentation does not Presentation adequately Presentation fully

    Rubric Criteria
    Does Not Meet
    Expectations

    Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 5

    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    reflect original thought and
    paraphrasing and does not
    adhere to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim while
    incorporating appropriate
    citations and references in
    APA or another format.

    reflects original thought and
    paraphrasing and adheres to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim
    while incorporating appropriate
    citations and references in
    APA or another format.

    reflects original thought
    and paraphrasing and
    adheres to reference
    requirements, including
    the use of credible
    evidence to support a
    claim while incorporating
    appropriate citations and
    references in APA or
    another format.

    Professional Writing

    Professional Writing:
    Clarity, Flow, and
    Organization

    Content contains significant
    spelling, punctuation, and/or
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing does not
    demonstrate adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and requires
    additional
    editing/proofreading. Key
    sections of presented
    content lack clarity, logical
    flow, and/or organization.

    Content contains few
    spelling, punctuation,
    and/or grammar/syntax
    errors. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    sentence and paragraph
    structure and may require
    some editing. Content
    presented is satisfactorily
    clear, logical, and/or
    organized, but could
    benefit from additional
    editing/revision.

    Content is free from
    spelling, punctuation, and
    grammar/syntax errors.
    Writing demonstrates
    appropriate sentence and
    paragraph structure.
    Content presented is clear,
    logical, and well-organized.

    Professional Writing:
    Context, Audience,
    Purpose, and Tone

    Content minimally or does
    not demonstrate awareness
    of context, audience, and/or
    purpose. Writing is not
    reflective of
    professional/scholarly tone
    and/or is not free of bias.
    Style is inconsistent with the

    Content demonstrates
    satisfactory awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is
    adequately professional,
    scholarly, and/or free from
    bias, and style is mostly
    consistent with the

    Content clearly
    demonstrates awareness of
    context, audience, and
    purpose. Tone is highly
    professional, scholarly, and
    free from bias, and style is
    appropriate for the
    professional

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC 6

    professional
    setting/workplace context
    and reflects the need for
    additional editing.

    professional
    setting/workplace context.

    setting/workplace context.

    Professional Writing:
    Originality, Source
    Credibility, and Attribution
    of Ideas

    Content does not
    adequately reflect original
    writing and/or paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates
    inconsistent adherence to
    reference requirements,
    including the use of credible
    evidence to support a claim,
    with appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and reference. There are
    numerous and/or significant
    errors.

    Content adequately reflects
    original writing and
    paraphrasing. Writing
    demonstrates adequate
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when
    applicable) and references.
    There are one or two minor
    errors.

    Content reflects original
    thought and writing and
    proper paraphrasing.
    Writing demonstrates full
    adherence to reference
    requirements, including the
    use of credible evidence to
    support a claim, with
    appropriate source
    attribution (when applicable)
    and references.

    **XD3002_PowerPointPresentationTemplate.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/xd3002-powerpointpresentationtemplate-pptx)

  • [Solved] XD02

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## APASTYLE.docx **## APASTYLE.docx** **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES** 1. How would you describe a “healthcare disparity?” 2. From your experience in your healthcare field, what are some of the biggest healthcare disparities you observe that impact the patien…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## APASTYLE.docx

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES**

    1. How would you describe a “healthcare disparity?”

    2. From your experience in your healthcare field, what are some of the biggest healthcare disparities you observe that impact the patients or clients you care for or serve?

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    **APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES**

    1. How would you describe a “healthcare disparity?”

    2. From your experience in your healthcare field, what are some of the biggest healthcare disparities you observe that impact the patients or clients you care for or serve?

  • [Solved] XD01

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## APASTYLE.docx **## APASTYLE.docx** APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE RERENCES 1. Explain how you define “personal bias.” 2. Describe a time when you witnessed a situation involving bias. Explain how you felt and reacted. **## APASTYLE.docx** APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE RER…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## APASTYLE.docx

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE RERENCES

    1. Explain how you define “personal bias.”

    2. Describe a time when you witnessed a situation involving bias. Explain how you felt and reacted.

    **## APASTYLE.docx**

    APA STYLE , AT LEAST THREE RERENCES

    1. Explain how you define “personal bias.”

    2. Describe a time when you witnessed a situation involving bias. Explain how you felt and reacted.

  • [Solved] week 1re

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #1 "Nursing stakeholder engagement is an essential component of human resources for health planning processes, and the gap in literature points to a need for up‐to‐date guidance to ensure nurses’ active involvement" (North et al., 2022). Being a nurse influences my role as a healthcare consumer by a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #1

    "Nursing stakeholder engagement is an essential component of human resources for health planning processes, and the gap in literature points to a need for up‐to‐date guidance to ensure nurses’ active involvement" (North et al., 2022). Being a nurse influences my role as a healthcare consumer by allowing me to discuss further healthcare options with providers. Whether this discussion is professional or personal, being a part of the healthcare system gives me a unique perspective on the processes that should be followed to treat a client appropriately. Knowing some about the U.S. Healthcare system can help me assist other stakeholders by assisting them in reviewing policies and procedures they may not understand.

    "Always remember, your voice as a practicing nurse can guide policy and influence changes that may significantly impact patient safety and overall patient outcomes" ( _What Are the Impacts of Health Policy on Nursing?_, 2024). As nurses, our voices can have the most impact on implementing new policies and procedures or modifying existing policies and procedures. As consumers and providers, we have a unique position to be involved on the frontlines of an ever-changing healthcare system.

    #2

    1. As a nurse, you wear at least two or more stakeholder hats; how does being a nurse influence your role as a consumer of healthcare?

    Being a nurse definitely influences how I approach my own healthcare. I’m more aware of what’s going on medically, which often leads me to wait to seek care—sometimes a bit too long—because I feel like I can handle things or I’m unsure if it’s serious enough. This could be a good thing or a bad thing, but I think it’s pretty common for nurses to hold off on seeking care until it’s absolutely necessary (Mason et al., 2021). I also tend to ask a lot of questions when I do go to the doctor, which might not be something every consumer is able to do. This proactive approach can be helpful, but it also highlights the disparities in patient advocacy that exist across different populations (Mason et al., 2021).

    That said, navigating the U.S. healthcare system as a consumer is tough. Insurance is expensive, confusing, and hard to understand. And, honestly, many of the benefits don’t seem worth the cost of premiums and out-of-pocket expenses. Research shows that the cost of healthcare continues to rise without corresponding improvements in care quality, which leaves many consumers feeling disillusioned (Mason et al., 2021). I know the system has its flaws, but it’s frustrating to see how many people have to choose between paying for care and other basic needs. As a nurse, I understand the importance of high-quality care, but as a consumer, I’m often left questioning if the benefits justify the costs (Mason et al., 2021).

    Mason et al. (2021) highlight that healthcare providers are often more aware of the barriers patients face, like the high cost of care and insurance challenges. This awareness makes me more critical of the system as a consumer because I know firsthand how these issues limit access to care for many people. The rising cost of care and insurance, along with inequities in access, are ongoing problems that affect millions of Americans (Mason et al., 2021).

    As both a nurse and a consumer, I can appreciate the hard work that goes into healthcare, but the system itself is hard to navigate and too expensive for most people. The lack of accessibility and value for the cost is something that definitely stands out to me. Moving forward, we need a more transparent and equitable system that addresses both the needs of consumers and the challenges providers face (Mason et al., 2021).

    2. How does your knowledge of the U.S. health care system impact how you can help other stakeholders?

    As a nurse, I see the healthcare system from a unique perspective. I know how expensive and complicated it can be, but that understanding helps me better guide patients and families through the process. I can, point them to resources like financial assistance programs, explain highlights of insurance, and make the system feel less overwhelming (Mason et al., 2021). I also use what I know to help my colleagues understand the challenges patients face and encourage compassion.

    My experience also gives me a voice in advocating for policy changes that could make healthcare more affordable and accessible. I’ve seen firsthand how the system can make it harder for people to get the care they need, and I want to be part of the solution (Mason et al., 2021).

    In short, my knowledge of the U.S. healthcare system helps me be a better advocate for patients, support my colleagues, and push for broader change to make healthcare more accessible and affordable.

    3. Explain the various sphere(s) of influence (consumer, provider, etc.) that would be the most impactful in advancing healthcare policy initiatives and explain why.

    To push for meaningful healthcare policy change, the consumer, provider, and policy-maker spheres are all essential.

    Consumers, including patients and the public, have a huge impact. When they speak out and push for change—whether it’s about costs, coverage, or access—they can force policymakers to take action. Their votes and advocacy are key to influencing healthcare reforms that directly affect their lives (Mason et al., 2021).

    Healthcare providers like nurses and doctors are also crucial in shaping policy. We understand firsthand what works and what doesn’t in the system, and we can use our voices to advocate for changes. Our input helps ensure that policies are practical and focused on improving care.

    Lastly, policy-makers are the ones who actually make and implement the laws. But their decisions are influenced by what consumers and providers push for. Effective policy-makers listen to both groups to create policies that truly work.

    All these spheres need to work together. Consumers drive demand, providers give real-world insights, and policy-makers make the changes happen.

    – 2 years ago