[Solved] Applied Sciences Assignment

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

assignment

– 2 years ago

**files (1)**

– ## unit2bid.docx

**## unit2bid.docx**

Your Office Manager has asked you to participate in writing a letter for patients who would like information on the Medicare options.

· The letter should explain the parts of Medicare, their differences, and features.
For this assignment, write a 2-3-page letter discussing Medicare Parts A, B, C, and D.

· Review Unit 2, Topic 2 Content and website links provided to assist you in writing the letter.

· Requirements:

· 2-3-page letter format, using proper APA format

· Use a professional tone when addressing patients.

· Clearly define and describe the four parts of Medicare so the patient will understand them.

· Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Please be cautioned that any material used in the assignment directly from the internet (copy and paste) will be given a zero-based on Herzing University Ethics Policy (Plagiarism). All information not your own must be given appropriate APA citation reference.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

**MO205 Unit 2 Assignment – Medicare: Patient Letter**

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MO205 Unit 2 Assignment – Medicare: Patient Letter |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>MO205-CO1 | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **20 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. | **18 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. | **16 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. | **14 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. | **12 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>There is no evidence of a defined statement. | | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **20 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. | **18 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. | **16 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. | **14 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. | **12 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. | | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **5 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. | **4.5 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. | **4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. | **3.5 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning. | | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **5 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. | **4.5 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. | **4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. | **3.5 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. | | 5 pts |

**## unit2bid.docx**

Your Office Manager has asked you to participate in writing a letter for patients who would like information on the Medicare options.

· The letter should explain the parts of Medicare, their differences, and features.
For this assignment, write a 2-3-page letter discussing Medicare Parts A, B, C, and D.

· Review Unit 2, Topic 2 Content and website links provided to assist you in writing the letter.

· Requirements:

· 2-3-page letter format, using proper APA format

· Use a professional tone when addressing patients.

· Clearly define and describe the four parts of Medicare so the patient will understand them.

· Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Please be cautioned that any material used in the assignment directly from the internet (copy and paste) will be given a zero-based on Herzing University Ethics Policy (Plagiarism). All information not your own must be given appropriate APA citation reference.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

**MO205 Unit 2 Assignment – Medicare: Patient Letter**

| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MO205 Unit 2 Assignment – Medicare: Patient Letter |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>MO205-CO1 | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **20 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. | **18 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. | **16 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. | **14 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. | **12 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>There is no evidence of a defined statement. | | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **20 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. | **18 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. | **16 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. | **14 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. | **12 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. | | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **5 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. | **4.5 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. | **4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. | **3.5 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning. | | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **5 pts**<br>**Level 5**<br>The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. | **4.5 pts**<br>**Level 4**<br>The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. | **4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. | **3.5 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. | **0 pts**<br>**Level 0**<br>There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. | | 5 pts |