Executive Solution Overview
**files (2)** – ## Feedback.pdf – annotated-ChapterTwo2-2.Revised.docx.pdf **## Feedback.pdf** We are almost there! There's still some cleaning up to do with a few areas to tighten. See comments within your work and below: The chapter has a stronger research gap than the earlier draft. The gap is ge…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (2)**
– ## Feedback.pdf
– annotated-ChapterTwo2-2.Revised.docx.pdf
**## Feedback.pdf**
We are almost there! There's still some cleaning up to do with a few areas to tighten. See
comments within your work and below:
The chapter has a stronger research gap than the earlier draft. The gap is generally correct, but
it becomes too broad and somewhat contradictory. You state that many studies rely on
perceptions and that more in-depth qualitative and quantitative studies are needed. Later, you
say there is a need to focus on quantitative data, but then immediately argue for qualitative
action research. Let's clear this up and clean this up.
There are numerous APA citation errors: missing commas between author names and years,
missing spaces before citations, incorrect ampersand usage in narrative citations, parenthetical
punctuation problems, and sources that are not alphabetized when multiple are used in-text. Do
some extensive cleaning throughout in this frame of reference.
The action research section is useful, but it may be more detailed than Chapter 2 requires. It
should stay as a literature-based rationale for why action research fits CRT implementation,
reflective practice, and classroom-based improvement. However, procedural details and claims
about how the study will be conducted should be saved for Chapter 3.
See the notes throughout and be sure to comb through the entire chapter to make sure that the
feedback left in one place is addressed in all instances. A thorough and attentive clean-up
should be able to trigger approval on the next submission.
Keep up the progress and momentum
**annotated-ChapterTwo2-2.Revised.docx.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/annotated-chaptertwo2-2-revised-docx-pdf)
**annotated-ChapterTwo2-2.Revised.docx.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/annotated-chaptertwo2-2-revised-docx-pdf)
**## Feedback.pdf**
We are almost there! There's still some cleaning up to do with a few areas to tighten. See
comments within your work and below:
The chapter has a stronger research gap than the earlier draft. The gap is generally correct, but
it becomes too broad and somewhat contradictory. You state that many studies rely on
perceptions and that more in-depth qualitative and quantitative studies are needed. Later, you
say there is a need to focus on quantitative data, but then immediately argue for qualitative
action research. Let's clear this up and clean this up.
There are numerous APA citation errors: missing commas between author names and years,
missing spaces before citations, incorrect ampersand usage in narrative citations, parenthetical
punctuation problems, and sources that are not alphabetized when multiple are used in-text. Do
some extensive cleaning throughout in this frame of reference.
The action research section is useful, but it may be more detailed than Chapter 2 requires. It
should stay as a literature-based rationale for why action research fits CRT implementation,
reflective practice, and classroom-based improvement. However, procedural details and claims
about how the study will be conducted should be saved for Chapter 3.
See the notes throughout and be sure to comb through the entire chapter to make sure that the
feedback left in one place is addressed in all instances. A thorough and attentive clean-up
should be able to trigger approval on the next submission.
Keep up the progress and momentum
**annotated-ChapterTwo2-2.Revised.docx.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/annotated-chaptertwo2-2-revised-docx-pdf)
**## Feedback.pdf**
We are almost there! There's still some cleaning up to do with a few areas to tighten. See
comments within your work and below:
The chapter has a stronger research gap than the earlier draft. The gap is generally correct, but
it becomes too broad and somewhat contradictory. You state that many studies rely on
perceptions and that more in-depth qualitative and quantitative studies are needed. Later, you
say there is a need to focus on quantitative data, but then immediately argue for qualitative
action research. Let's clear this up and clean this up.
There are numerous APA citation errors: missing commas between author names and years,
missing spaces before citations, incorrect ampersand usage in narrative citations, parenthetical
punctuation problems, and sources that are not alphabetized when multiple are used in-text. Do
some extensive cleaning throughout in this frame of reference.
The action research section is useful, but it may be more detailed than Chapter 2 requires. It
should stay as a literature-based rationale for why action research fits CRT implementation,
reflective practice, and classroom-based improvement. However, procedural details and claims
about how the study will be conducted should be saved for Chapter 3.
See the notes throughout and be sure to comb through the entire chapter to make sure that the
feedback left in one place is addressed in all instances. A thorough and attentive clean-up
should be able to trigger approval on the next submission.
Keep up the progress and momentum
**annotated-ChapterTwo2-2.Revised.docx.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/annotated-chaptertwo2-2-revised-docx-pdf)
Leave a Reply