Assignment Prompt & Instructions
[>Machine Learning homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/computer-science-machine-learning)
week 6 project
– 2 years ago
**files (6)**
– ## feedbackonthepaper.txt
– ## basicscalingapprovaltopic.txt
– ## feedbackkDr.WR.txt
– ## projectplantemplateDr.M.txt
– Plan_approval11.docx
– ProjectPlanGuideCapstoneFinal2024.pdf
**## feedbackonthepaper.txt**
This submitted project plan is still insufficient and does not meet the requirements of the project plan guide. In particular, the specific business problem is not aligned with pages 4 – 5 of the guide. Also, the research question is not aligned with the problem statement. Additionally, the project plan is not in the correct format
**## basicscalingapprovaltopic.txt**
1.Achieve a Proficient or greater rating on all grading criteria for this assignment.
I received a Basic scale for this topic
2.Describe the significance of the topic to a program or field and program specialization.
Identifies, but does not describe the significance of the topic to a program or field and program specialization.
3. Explain the proposed gap or problem, supported by existing literature
Identifies, but does not explain the proposed gap or problem, supported by existing literature
4. Describe the specific topic, including the target population name and phenomena
Identifies, but does not describe the specific topic, including the target population name and phenomena
5. Identify the theoretical foundation or practice orientation for the proposed study, supported by literature
Identifies the theoretical foundation or practice orientation for the proposed study but it is not supported by literature
6.Articulate the problem to be addressed and the questions aligned with the identified problem.
Identifies, but does not articulate the problem to be addressed and the questions aligned with the identified problem
7.Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Conveys purpose in a well-organized text. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards
8.Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. –
Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.
**## feedbackkDr.WR.txt**
1. Alignment to the Program of Study
Your topic proposal is well-aligned with the DIT program and focuses on cybersecurity ransomware mitigation, a critical issue in IT security. The study effectively highlights the challenges organizations face in responding to ransomware threats, making it a relevant area of research.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Clarify how this study contributes to improving cybersecurity resilience in IT professional environments.
Define how the research aligns with information security governance frameworks and risk management principles.
2. Project Problem
Your problem statement identifies key issues related to ransomware mitigation, particularly the lack of effective response strategies. However, the statement could be refined for better clarity and conciseness.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Specify the direct impact of ineffective ransomware response strategies on IT professionals and their ability to mitigate cybersecurity threats.
Clearly differentiate between detection, mitigation, and response efforts in cybersecurity.
Ensure that the problem statement explicitly connects to the research gap.
3. Identified Research Gap
Your research effectively highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of modern ransomware strategies and post-attack organizational responses. The discussion on incident response gaps is well justified.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Further clarify how your study builds on previous research while addressing the identified gap.
Discuss how findings from this study can help improve cybersecurity training and incident response planning within IT teams.
4. Literature Synthesis
Your literature review provides a strong foundation by discussing various ransomware mitigation techniques, including network intrusion detection and economic models of cybercrime. However, the synthesis could benefit from a more comparative approach to showcase different perspectives.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Compare existing response frameworks and highlight their limitations.
Strengthen the discussion of AI applications in ransomware mitigation by including both opportunities and risks.
Provide more evidence on the real-world effectiveness of cybersecurity training programs.
5. Project Question
Your research question should be centered on a single qualitative research inquiry, directly incorporating the target population of IT professionals.
Refined Research Question:
How do IT professionals perceive the effectiveness of existing ransomware mitigation strategies in combating evolving cyber threats?
Suggestions for Improvement:
Ensure that the central research question directly references IT professionals as the target population.
If needed, frame additional inquiries as subquestions supporting the main research focus.
6. Target Population
Your target population should be focused solely on IT professionals, as they are the key individuals responsible for ransomware mitigation and cybersecurity response.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Narrow the target population to IT security professionals, cybersecurity analysts, and IT incident response teams.
Exclude broader business leadership and policymakers to maintain research focus on IT expertise and hands-on mitigation strategies.
7. Study Background & Research Question Alignment
Your background section provides useful context on the increasing complexity of ransomware attacks. However, additional discussion on real-world ransomware incidents and their consequences would strengthen the argument.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Provide specific examples of recent ransomware attacks to illustrate the urgency of the issue.
Clearly demonstrate why this research is necessary given the rise of Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models.
Align the study background with the research gap to ensure consistency.
8. Organization, Evidence, and Tone
Your assignment is well-organized and maintains a strong academic tone. However, minor refinements in transitions and logical flow will enhance readability.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Improve transition sentences between sections for smoother flow.
Ensure each section builds upon previous discussions cohesively.
Avoid redundancy in discussing cybersecurity frameworks.
**## projectplantemplateDr.M.txt**
Name:
Learner ID:
Learner Email Address:
School:
Program/Specialization:
Type of project (e.g., dissertation, capstone, etc.):
Methodology – Quantitative or Qualitative:
Quarter/Year of V8927completion:
——————————————————————–
Project topic
Topic proposal is grounded in a problem and aligned with program of study.
Alignment to the Program of Study
Presents an introduction to a clear topic proposal grounded in a problem within the program, project, and topic. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
——————————————————————–
Project Problem
Clearly stated problem aligns with program, reflects literature gap or practice issue, and identifies population of interest.
Problem to be Addressed
Describe a general and specific problem that is clearly defined and aligned with the program, including what the problem is, who is experiencing the problem, where the problem exists, and the professional/organizational context. Suggested length 1paragraph.
Gap
Present an analysis of a gap in alignment with the problem and placed within the program. Addresses the broader questions of “who cares” and “why now”. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
——————————————————————–
Supporting Evidence
Literature review addresses previous relevant projects and articulates theoretical (practice) orientation.
Primary Orientation
Provide an introduction to the review of scholarly literature, an argument for conducting the review, and a primary theoretical (and practice) orientation. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Efforts to Address the Problem
Provide a synthesized review of the scholarly literature to expose, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Synthesis of the Evidence
Provide a logically organized and synthesized review and analysis of the literature in close alignment with the topic, problem, and gap. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
——————————————————————–
Purpose of the Project and Project Questions
Purpose and questions align with topic, problem, and supporting evidence, including definition of terms.
Purpose of the Project
Provide one-to-two sentences aligned with the topic, problem, gap in practice, and project question to state the purpose of the project.
Statement of Primary Question(s)
Provide 1-3 project questions that align with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
Definition of Terms
Present a list of terms and definitions that relate to the program, topic, problem, gap, program, and project framework. This is a working section which you will continue to update in future courses. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
If you are seeking Topic Endorsement in XX-V8926 – Doctoral Project Development – Topic Approval, you only need to complete the sections above for the approval.
———————————————————————–
Proposed Project Framework
Methodological approach is clearly defined and includes constructs, phenomena, variables, and population.
Methodological Approach
Provide a description and explanation of the methodological approach. The methodological approach must align to the topic, problem, supporting evidence, and data sources. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Population and Sample (including site if necessary)
Describe the general target population (e.g., size, characteristics). Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Constructs, Phenomena, Variables
Present evidence and explanation for the final choice of framework. Constructs, phenomena, and/or variables must align to the topic, problem, gap, and project questions. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
——————————————————————
Proposed Data Sources
Instrumentation and data collection tools address project concepts; ethical threats and their mitigation are detailed.
Measures or Artifacts to be Reviewed
Present a description of instrumentation or data collection tools. Measures or artifacts must closely align with the methodological approach. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Detailed Procedures
Present a description of the processes needed to complete the instruments by the participants or observers. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Validity/Reliability/Credibility/Dependability
Identify and present the potential threats to reliability and validity (quantitative techniques) or trustworthiness (qualitative techniques). Include a proposed plan to mitigate the noted threats. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
————————————————————————
Proposed Data Collection
Describe sampling, recruitment, data collection procedures, and potential ethical considerations.
Sampling Strategy, Number participants
Describe, explain, and justify the sampling strategy to be used. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Recruitment Procedures
Provide a recruitment process to identify, screen, and recruit participants as it aligns with the methodological approach. Present the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participating in the project. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Data Collection Process
Provide a logical step-by-step data collection process as it aligns with the methodological approach. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Ethical Considerations
Identify potential ethical issues and provide a proposed plan to adhere to strict ethical standards. Include details regarding privacy, confidentiality, and data security procedures and concerns. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
———————————————————————-
Proposed Data Analysis Plan
Articulate data analysis techniques appropriate to project framework.
Present a plan to analyze and present data with techniques that are appropriate to the project, framework, data sources, and sample size. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
References
APA formatted reference section that includes a reference for each citation used in text.
**Plan_approval11.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/plan-approval11-docx)
**ProjectPlanGuideCapstoneFinal2024.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/projectplanguidecapstonefinal2024-pdf)
**ProjectPlanGuideCapstoneFinal2024.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/projectplanguidecapstonefinal2024-pdf)
**## feedbackonthepaper.txt**
This submitted project plan is still insufficient and does not meet the requirements of the project plan guide. In particular, the specific business problem is not aligned with pages 4 – 5 of the guide. Also, the research question is not aligned with the problem statement. Additionally, the project plan is not in the correct format
**## basicscalingapprovaltopic.txt**
1.Achieve a Proficient or greater rating on all grading criteria for this assignment.
I received a Basic scale for this topic
2.Describe the significance of the topic to a program or field and program specialization.
Identifies, but does not describe the significance of the topic to a program or field and program specialization.
3. Explain the proposed gap or problem, supported by existing literature
Identifies, but does not explain the proposed gap or problem, supported by existing literature
4. Describe the specific topic, including the target population name and phenomena
Identifies, but does not describe the specific topic, including the target population name and phenomena
5. Identify the theoretical foundation or practice orientation for the proposed study, supported by literature
Identifies the theoretical foundation or practice orientation for the proposed study but it is not supported by literature
6.Articulate the problem to be addressed and the questions aligned with the identified problem.
Identifies, but does not articulate the problem to be addressed and the questions aligned with the identified problem
7.Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Conveys purpose in a well-organized text. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards
8.Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. –
Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.
**## feedbackkDr.WR.txt**
1. Alignment to the Program of Study
Your topic proposal is well-aligned with the DIT program and focuses on cybersecurity ransomware mitigation, a critical issue in IT security. The study effectively highlights the challenges organizations face in responding to ransomware threats, making it a relevant area of research.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Clarify how this study contributes to improving cybersecurity resilience in IT professional environments.
Define how the research aligns with information security governance frameworks and risk management principles.
2. Project Problem
Your problem statement identifies key issues related to ransomware mitigation, particularly the lack of effective response strategies. However, the statement could be refined for better clarity and conciseness.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Specify the direct impact of ineffective ransomware response strategies on IT professionals and their ability to mitigate cybersecurity threats.
Clearly differentiate between detection, mitigation, and response efforts in cybersecurity.
Ensure that the problem statement explicitly connects to the research gap.
3. Identified Research Gap
Your research effectively highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of modern ransomware strategies and post-attack organizational responses. The discussion on incident response gaps is well justified.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Further clarify how your study builds on previous research while addressing the identified gap.
Discuss how findings from this study can help improve cybersecurity training and incident response planning within IT teams.
4. Literature Synthesis
Your literature review provides a strong foundation by discussing various ransomware mitigation techniques, including network intrusion detection and economic models of cybercrime. However, the synthesis could benefit from a more comparative approach to showcase different perspectives.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Compare existing response frameworks and highlight their limitations.
Strengthen the discussion of AI applications in ransomware mitigation by including both opportunities and risks.
Provide more evidence on the real-world effectiveness of cybersecurity training programs.
5. Project Question
Your research question should be centered on a single qualitative research inquiry, directly incorporating the target population of IT professionals.
Refined Research Question:
How do IT professionals perceive the effectiveness of existing ransomware mitigation strategies in combating evolving cyber threats?
Suggestions for Improvement:
Ensure that the central research question directly references IT professionals as the target population.
If needed, frame additional inquiries as subquestions supporting the main research focus.
6. Target Population
Your target population should be focused solely on IT professionals, as they are the key individuals responsible for ransomware mitigation and cybersecurity response.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Narrow the target population to IT security professionals, cybersecurity analysts, and IT incident response teams.
Exclude broader business leadership and policymakers to maintain research focus on IT expertise and hands-on mitigation strategies.
7. Study Background & Research Question Alignment
Your background section provides useful context on the increasing complexity of ransomware attacks. However, additional discussion on real-world ransomware incidents and their consequences would strengthen the argument.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Provide specific examples of recent ransomware attacks to illustrate the urgency of the issue.
Clearly demonstrate why this research is necessary given the rise of Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models.
Align the study background with the research gap to ensure consistency.
8. Organization, Evidence, and Tone
Your assignment is well-organized and maintains a strong academic tone. However, minor refinements in transitions and logical flow will enhance readability.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Improve transition sentences between sections for smoother flow.
Ensure each section builds upon previous discussions cohesively.
Avoid redundancy in discussing cybersecurity frameworks.
**## projectplantemplateDr.M.txt**
Name:
Learner ID:
Learner Email Address:
School:
Program/Specialization:
Type of project (e.g., dissertation, capstone, etc.):
Methodology – Quantitative or Qualitative:
Quarter/Year of V8927completion:
——————————————————————–
Project topic
Topic proposal is grounded in a problem and aligned with program of study.
Alignment to the Program of Study
Presents an introduction to a clear topic proposal grounded in a problem within the program, project, and topic. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
——————————————————————–
Project Problem
Clearly stated problem aligns with program, reflects literature gap or practice issue, and identifies population of interest.
Problem to be Addressed
Describe a general and specific problem that is clearly defined and aligned with the program, including what the problem is, who is experiencing the problem, where the problem exists, and the professional/organizational context. Suggested length 1paragraph.
Gap
Present an analysis of a gap in alignment with the problem and placed within the program. Addresses the broader questions of “who cares” and “why now”. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
——————————————————————–
Supporting Evidence
Literature review addresses previous relevant projects and articulates theoretical (practice) orientation.
Primary Orientation
Provide an introduction to the review of scholarly literature, an argument for conducting the review, and a primary theoretical (and practice) orientation. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Efforts to Address the Problem
Provide a synthesized review of the scholarly literature to expose, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Synthesis of the Evidence
Provide a logically organized and synthesized review and analysis of the literature in close alignment with the topic, problem, and gap. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
——————————————————————–
Purpose of the Project and Project Questions
Purpose and questions align with topic, problem, and supporting evidence, including definition of terms.
Purpose of the Project
Provide one-to-two sentences aligned with the topic, problem, gap in practice, and project question to state the purpose of the project.
Statement of Primary Question(s)
Provide 1-3 project questions that align with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
Definition of Terms
Present a list of terms and definitions that relate to the program, topic, problem, gap, program, and project framework. This is a working section which you will continue to update in future courses. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
If you are seeking Topic Endorsement in XX-V8926 – Doctoral Project Development – Topic Approval, you only need to complete the sections above for the approval.
———————————————————————–
Proposed Project Framework
Methodological approach is clearly defined and includes constructs, phenomena, variables, and population.
Methodological Approach
Provide a description and explanation of the methodological approach. The methodological approach must align to the topic, problem, supporting evidence, and data sources. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Population and Sample (including site if necessary)
Describe the general target population (e.g., size, characteristics). Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Constructs, Phenomena, Variables
Present evidence and explanation for the final choice of framework. Constructs, phenomena, and/or variables must align to the topic, problem, gap, and project questions. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
——————————————————————
Proposed Data Sources
Instrumentation and data collection tools address project concepts; ethical threats and their mitigation are detailed.
Measures or Artifacts to be Reviewed
Present a description of instrumentation or data collection tools. Measures or artifacts must closely align with the methodological approach. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Detailed Procedures
Present a description of the processes needed to complete the instruments by the participants or observers. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Validity/Reliability/Credibility/Dependability
Identify and present the potential threats to reliability and validity (quantitative techniques) or trustworthiness (qualitative techniques). Include a proposed plan to mitigate the noted threats. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
————————————————————————
Proposed Data Collection
Describe sampling, recruitment, data collection procedures, and potential ethical considerations.
Sampling Strategy, Number participants
Describe, explain, and justify the sampling strategy to be used. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Recruitment Procedures
Provide a recruitment process to identify, screen, and recruit participants as it aligns with the methodological approach. Present the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participating in the project. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Data Collection Process
Provide a logical step-by-step data collection process as it aligns with the methodological approach. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Ethical Considerations
Identify potential ethical issues and provide a proposed plan to adhere to strict ethical standards. Include details regarding privacy, confidentiality, and data security procedures and concerns. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
———————————————————————-
Proposed Data Analysis Plan
Articulate data analysis techniques appropriate to project framework.
Present a plan to analyze and present data with techniques that are appropriate to the project, framework, data sources, and sample size. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
References
APA formatted reference section that includes a reference for each citation used in text.
**Plan_approval11.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/plan-approval11-docx)
**ProjectPlanGuideCapstoneFinal2024.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/projectplanguidecapstonefinal2024-pdf)
**## feedbackonthepaper.txt**
This submitted project plan is still insufficient and does not meet the requirements of the project plan guide. In particular, the specific business problem is not aligned with pages 4 – 5 of the guide. Also, the research question is not aligned with the problem statement. Additionally, the project plan is not in the correct format
**## basicscalingapprovaltopic.txt**
1.Achieve a Proficient or greater rating on all grading criteria for this assignment.
I received a Basic scale for this topic
2.Describe the significance of the topic to a program or field and program specialization.
Identifies, but does not describe the significance of the topic to a program or field and program specialization.
3. Explain the proposed gap or problem, supported by existing literature
Identifies, but does not explain the proposed gap or problem, supported by existing literature
4. Describe the specific topic, including the target population name and phenomena
Identifies, but does not describe the specific topic, including the target population name and phenomena
5. Identify the theoretical foundation or practice orientation for the proposed study, supported by literature
Identifies the theoretical foundation or practice orientation for the proposed study but it is not supported by literature
6.Articulate the problem to be addressed and the questions aligned with the identified problem.
Identifies, but does not articulate the problem to be addressed and the questions aligned with the identified problem
7.Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Conveys purpose in a well-organized text. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards
8.Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. –
Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.
**## feedbackkDr.WR.txt**
1. Alignment to the Program of Study
Your topic proposal is well-aligned with the DIT program and focuses on cybersecurity ransomware mitigation, a critical issue in IT security. The study effectively highlights the challenges organizations face in responding to ransomware threats, making it a relevant area of research.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Clarify how this study contributes to improving cybersecurity resilience in IT professional environments.
Define how the research aligns with information security governance frameworks and risk management principles.
2. Project Problem
Your problem statement identifies key issues related to ransomware mitigation, particularly the lack of effective response strategies. However, the statement could be refined for better clarity and conciseness.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Specify the direct impact of ineffective ransomware response strategies on IT professionals and their ability to mitigate cybersecurity threats.
Clearly differentiate between detection, mitigation, and response efforts in cybersecurity.
Ensure that the problem statement explicitly connects to the research gap.
3. Identified Research Gap
Your research effectively highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of modern ransomware strategies and post-attack organizational responses. The discussion on incident response gaps is well justified.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Further clarify how your study builds on previous research while addressing the identified gap.
Discuss how findings from this study can help improve cybersecurity training and incident response planning within IT teams.
4. Literature Synthesis
Your literature review provides a strong foundation by discussing various ransomware mitigation techniques, including network intrusion detection and economic models of cybercrime. However, the synthesis could benefit from a more comparative approach to showcase different perspectives.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Compare existing response frameworks and highlight their limitations.
Strengthen the discussion of AI applications in ransomware mitigation by including both opportunities and risks.
Provide more evidence on the real-world effectiveness of cybersecurity training programs.
5. Project Question
Your research question should be centered on a single qualitative research inquiry, directly incorporating the target population of IT professionals.
Refined Research Question:
How do IT professionals perceive the effectiveness of existing ransomware mitigation strategies in combating evolving cyber threats?
Suggestions for Improvement:
Ensure that the central research question directly references IT professionals as the target population.
If needed, frame additional inquiries as subquestions supporting the main research focus.
6. Target Population
Your target population should be focused solely on IT professionals, as they are the key individuals responsible for ransomware mitigation and cybersecurity response.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Narrow the target population to IT security professionals, cybersecurity analysts, and IT incident response teams.
Exclude broader business leadership and policymakers to maintain research focus on IT expertise and hands-on mitigation strategies.
7. Study Background & Research Question Alignment
Your background section provides useful context on the increasing complexity of ransomware attacks. However, additional discussion on real-world ransomware incidents and their consequences would strengthen the argument.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Provide specific examples of recent ransomware attacks to illustrate the urgency of the issue.
Clearly demonstrate why this research is necessary given the rise of Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models.
Align the study background with the research gap to ensure consistency.
8. Organization, Evidence, and Tone
Your assignment is well-organized and maintains a strong academic tone. However, minor refinements in transitions and logical flow will enhance readability.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Improve transition sentences between sections for smoother flow.
Ensure each section builds upon previous discussions cohesively.
Avoid redundancy in discussing cybersecurity frameworks.
**## projectplantemplateDr.M.txt**
Name:
Learner ID:
Learner Email Address:
School:
Program/Specialization:
Type of project (e.g., dissertation, capstone, etc.):
Methodology – Quantitative or Qualitative:
Quarter/Year of V8927completion:
——————————————————————–
Project topic
Topic proposal is grounded in a problem and aligned with program of study.
Alignment to the Program of Study
Presents an introduction to a clear topic proposal grounded in a problem within the program, project, and topic. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
——————————————————————–
Project Problem
Clearly stated problem aligns with program, reflects literature gap or practice issue, and identifies population of interest.
Problem to be Addressed
Describe a general and specific problem that is clearly defined and aligned with the program, including what the problem is, who is experiencing the problem, where the problem exists, and the professional/organizational context. Suggested length 1paragraph.
Gap
Present an analysis of a gap in alignment with the problem and placed within the program. Addresses the broader questions of “who cares” and “why now”. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
——————————————————————–
Supporting Evidence
Literature review addresses previous relevant projects and articulates theoretical (practice) orientation.
Primary Orientation
Provide an introduction to the review of scholarly literature, an argument for conducting the review, and a primary theoretical (and practice) orientation. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Efforts to Address the Problem
Provide a synthesized review of the scholarly literature to expose, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Synthesis of the Evidence
Provide a logically organized and synthesized review and analysis of the literature in close alignment with the topic, problem, and gap. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
——————————————————————–
Purpose of the Project and Project Questions
Purpose and questions align with topic, problem, and supporting evidence, including definition of terms.
Purpose of the Project
Provide one-to-two sentences aligned with the topic, problem, gap in practice, and project question to state the purpose of the project.
Statement of Primary Question(s)
Provide 1-3 project questions that align with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
Definition of Terms
Present a list of terms and definitions that relate to the program, topic, problem, gap, program, and project framework. This is a working section which you will continue to update in future courses. Suggested length 1 paragraph.
If you are seeking Topic Endorsement in XX-V8926 – Doctoral Project Development – Topic Approval, you only need to complete the sections above for the approval.
———————————————————————–
Proposed Project Framework
Methodological approach is clearly defined and includes constructs, phenomena, variables, and population.
Methodological Approach
Provide a description and explanation of the methodological approach. The methodological approach must align to the topic, problem, supporting evidence, and data sources. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Population and Sample (including site if necessary)
Describe the general target population (e.g., size, characteristics). Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
Constructs, Phenomena, Variables
Present evidence and explanation for the final choice of framework. Constructs, phenomena, and/or variables must align to the topic, problem, gap, and project questions. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
——————————————————————
Proposed Data Sources
Instrumentation and data collection tools address project concepts; ethical threats and their mitigation are detailed.
Measures or Artifacts to be Reviewed
Present a description of instrumentation or data collection tools. Measures or artifacts must closely align with the methodological approach. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Detailed Procedures
Present a description of the processes needed to complete the instruments by the participants or observers. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Validity/Reliability/Credibility/Dependability
Identify and present the potential threats to reliability and validity (quantitative techniques) or trustworthiness (qualitative techniques). Include a proposed plan to mitigate the noted threats. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
————————————————————————
Proposed Data Collection
Describe sampling, recruitment, data collection procedures, and potential ethical considerations.
Sampling Strategy, Number participants
Describe, explain, and justify the sampling strategy to be used. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Recruitment Procedures
Provide a recruitment process to identify, screen, and recruit participants as it aligns with the methodological approach. Present the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participating in the project. Suggested length 2-3 paragraphs.
Data Collection Process
Provide a logical step-by-step data collection process as it aligns with the methodological approach. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
Ethical Considerations
Identify potential ethical issues and provide a proposed plan to adhere to strict ethical standards. Include details regarding privacy, confidentiality, and data security procedures and concerns. Suggested length 1-2 paragraphs.
———————————————————————-
Proposed Data Analysis Plan
Articulate data analysis techniques appropriate to project framework.
Present a plan to analyze and present data with techniques that are appropriate to the project, framework, data sources, and sample size. Suggested length 3-4 paragraphs.
References
APA formatted reference section that includes a reference for each citation used in text.
**Plan_approval11.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/plan-approval11-docx)
**ProjectPlanGuideCapstoneFinal2024.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/projectplanguidecapstonefinal2024-pdf)