Tag: Reading

  • [Solved] Review Saki’s “The Open Window” in written, audio, and video forms in the Learning Resources. Ensure that you experience the different forms in that order.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Consider the imagery you created in your mind as you interacted with the **written** version of “The Open Window.” Describe this imagery, and discuss whether it helped you understand the story. – Did the imagery or imagined tone change when you listened to the **audio**? How? – After watching the …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Consider the imagery you created in your mind as you interacted with the **written** version of “The Open Window.” Describe this imagery, and discuss whether it helped you understand the story.
    – Did the imagery or imagined tone change when you listened to the **audio**? How?
    – After watching the **video**, have you changed your mind about the story or the character? If so, describe the change and why you think this happened.
    – Technology has made it easier to share visual versions of written works. Does this impact our need to “see to believe” or influence how easily we understand material we have read but not seen?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBXb-8YoR0E

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdqeKs8y_5s

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Reading homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Class4Ass1.docx **## Class4Ass1.docx** Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest on Patient Management & Delegation. Once you have chosen your diagnosis o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Class4Ass1.docx

    **## Class4Ass1.docx**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest on Patient Management & Delegation. Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following: HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    **## Class4Ass1.docx**

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest on Patient Management & Delegation. Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following: HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.

    · Review the article for the following criteria:

    · Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    · Credibility factors.

    · Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    · The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.

    · Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document

    · Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    · Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.

    · Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?

    · Include a link to your article.

    · Include a reference to your article in APA format.

  • [Solved] Reading homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Class4Ass2.docx **## Class4Ass2.docx** HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS · Explain an issue associated with this diagnosis that could benefit from an EBP approach. · Choose the EBP model you wish to implement. · **Stetler Model** · **Description:** The Stetl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Class4Ass2.docx

    **## Class4Ass2.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Explain an issue associated with this diagnosis that could benefit from an EBP approach.

    · Choose the EBP model you wish to implement.

    ·
    **Stetler Model**

    ·
    **Description:** The Stetler Model helps practitioners assess how research findings and other relevant evidence can be applied in clinical practice. It examines how to use evidence to create formal change within organizations and how individual practitioners can use research informally as part of critical thinking and reflective practice.

    · The Stetler Model is useful for developing health messages, creating common standards, and implementing evidence-based changes. For example, it can guide nurses in incorporating research findings on breastfeeding into their practice.

    ·

    · Describe each step of the EBP model.

    · Preparation:

    · This phase involves identifying the purpose, context, and sources of the EBP project.

    · Validation:

    · The quality and reliability of the sources are evaluated to determine their acceptance or rejection.

    · Comparative Evaluation and Decision-Making:

    · This phase focuses on determining the acceptability and feasibility of the evidence findings' summary.

    · Translation/Application:

    · An algorithm for applying the findings is developed.

    · Evaluation:

    · The outcomes of implementing the evidence are assessed to determine if the EBP goals were achieved.

    · Apply the steps of the model to your search for evidence for your diagnosis issue, and describe how you applied them.

    · Locate at least three separate resources of evidence to assist with your diagnosis issue.

    · Analyze the credibility and relevance of each resource as it relates to your diagnosis.

    **This is a paper and should be 3–5 pages, not including the title page or reference page. The paper must be in APA format.**

    **## Class4Ass2.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Explain an issue associated with this diagnosis that could benefit from an EBP approach.

    · Choose the EBP model you wish to implement.

    ·
    **Stetler Model**

    ·
    **Description:** The Stetler Model helps practitioners assess how research findings and other relevant evidence can be applied in clinical practice. It examines how to use evidence to create formal change within organizations and how individual practitioners can use research informally as part of critical thinking and reflective practice.

    · The Stetler Model is useful for developing health messages, creating common standards, and implementing evidence-based changes. For example, it can guide nurses in incorporating research findings on breastfeeding into their practice.

    ·

    · Describe each step of the EBP model.

    · Preparation:

    · This phase involves identifying the purpose, context, and sources of the EBP project.

    · Validation:

    · The quality and reliability of the sources are evaluated to determine their acceptance or rejection.

    · Comparative Evaluation and Decision-Making:

    · This phase focuses on determining the acceptability and feasibility of the evidence findings' summary.

    · Translation/Application:

    · An algorithm for applying the findings is developed.

    · Evaluation:

    · The outcomes of implementing the evidence are assessed to determine if the EBP goals were achieved.

    · Apply the steps of the model to your search for evidence for your diagnosis issue, and describe how you applied them.

    · Locate at least three separate resources of evidence to assist with your diagnosis issue.

    · Analyze the credibility and relevance of each resource as it relates to your diagnosis.

    **This is a paper and should be 3–5 pages, not including the title page or reference page. The paper must be in APA format.**

  • [Solved] Discussion Thread: Worldview

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    It is impossible to study the law without first determining the framework in which the topic can be analyzed. In other words, before studying the concepts found in torts, contracts, intellectual property, or criminal law, one’s worldview must be identified. What does it mean to identify a worldview?…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    It is impossible to study the law without first determining the framework in which the topic can be analyzed. In other words, before studying the concepts found in torts, contracts, intellectual property, or criminal law, one’s worldview must be identified.

    What does it mean to identify a worldview? What is your definition of law?

    least 200 words

    BOOK:  **Sharp, Moorman, & Claussen: Sport Law: A Managerial Approach**

    [**Read: Sharp, Moorman, & Claussen: Chapter 1**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/742206/modules/items/83560571 "Read: Sharp, Moorman, & Claussen: Chapter 1")

    [**Read: Sharp, Moorman, & Claussen: Chapter 2**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/742206/modules/items/83560591 "Read: Sharp, Moorman, & Claussen: Chapter 2")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion Thread: Arms Race

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What evidence of the “arms race” do you currently see in sport? Use two examples that are not used in the book to highlight your response. What is the motivation for these organizations in taking this approach? Be sure to cite your sources at the end of your thread. Your post should be a minimum of …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What evidence of the “arms race” do you currently see in sport? Use two examples that are not used in the book to highlight your response. What is the motivation for these organizations in taking this approach? Be sure to cite your sources at the end of your thread. Your post should be a minimum of 500 words.

    BOOK: [**Aicher, Paule-Koba & Newland: Sport Facility and Event Management**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/742191/modules/items/83561695 "Aicher, Paule-Koba & Newland: Sport Facility and Event Management ")

    [**Read: Aicher, Paule-Koba & Newland: Chapter 1**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/742191/modules/items/83561784 "Read: Aicher, Paule-Koba & Newland: Chapter 1 ")

    [**Read: Aicher, Paule-Koba & Newland: Chapter 2**](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/742191/modules/items/83561797 "Read: Aicher, Paule-Koba & Newland: Chapter 2 ")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Reading homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Class4Ass3.docx **## Class4Ass3.docx** HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS · **Length of submission**: Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it. · **Number of references**: Cite a m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Class4Ass3.docx

    **## Class4Ass3.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    ·
    **Length of submission**:
    Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

    ·
    **Number of references**:
    Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    ·
    **APA formatting**: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

    PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

    It stands for:

    · P – Patient/population/problem.

    · I – Intervention.

    · C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).

    · O – Outcomes.

    · T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

    Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source's specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

    **PICOT Elements:**

    **(P)** –
    **Population, Patients or Problem**: The sample of subjects used in a study, or the problem being addressed.

    **(I)** –
    **Intervention**:  The treatment that will be provided to subjects enrolled in your study.

    **(C)** –
    **Comparison or Control**:  Identifies an alternative intervention or treatment to compare. Many study designs refer to this as the control group. If an existing treatment is considered the ‘gold standard’, then it should be the comparison group. A control group is not required for every type of study.

    **(O)** –
    **Outcome**: The clinical outcome that measures the effectiveness of the intervention.

    **(T)** –
    **Time**: Duration of the data collection.  Some versions don't include this element, and time may not be specified in cases where the question is focused on prediction or diagnoses.

    In your submission, make sure you address the following:

    · Review the PICO(T) process.

    · Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.

    · Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.

    · Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.

    · Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    · Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).

    · Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.

    · Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.

    · Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

    **## Class4Ass3.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    ·
    **Length of submission**:
    Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

    ·
    **Number of references**:
    Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    ·
    **APA formatting**: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

    PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

    It stands for:

    · P – Patient/population/problem.

    · I – Intervention.

    · C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).

    · O – Outcomes.

    · T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

    Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source's specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

    **PICOT Elements:**

    **(P)** –
    **Population, Patients or Problem**: The sample of subjects used in a study, or the problem being addressed.

    **(I)** –
    **Intervention**:  The treatment that will be provided to subjects enrolled in your study.

    **(C)** –
    **Comparison or Control**:  Identifies an alternative intervention or treatment to compare. Many study designs refer to this as the control group. If an existing treatment is considered the ‘gold standard’, then it should be the comparison group. A control group is not required for every type of study.

    **(O)** –
    **Outcome**: The clinical outcome that measures the effectiveness of the intervention.

    **(T)** –
    **Time**: Duration of the data collection.  Some versions don't include this element, and time may not be specified in cases where the question is focused on prediction or diagnoses.

    In your submission, make sure you address the following:

    · Review the PICO(T) process.

    · Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.

    · Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.

    · Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.

    · Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    · Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).

    · Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.

    · Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.

    · Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

  • [Solved] ACADEMIC POSTER

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a one-page academic poster or infographic to showcase your research. Offer a comparison of the two characteristics you chose, using the research you completed during your previous Research Diary Log assignments. Explain the results of your research and conclude with a proposal for how the tw…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a one-page academic poster or infographic to showcase your research. Offer a comparison of the two characteristics you chose, using the research you completed during your previous Research Diary Log assignments. Explain the results of your research and conclude with a proposal for how the two characteristics can be uniquely and meaningfully connected.

    Your poster or infographic should include headings, a brief description of your research findings, and tables or charts when appropriate. Posters should also include effective use of color, images, and clear fonts.

    The poster or infographic must include:

    1. Title
    2. An introduction of the two Profile characteristics
    3. Explanation and discussion of Profile Characteristic Number 1
    4. Explanation and discussion of Profile Characteristic Number 2
    5. Conclusion connecting the two Profile characteristics
    6. References list

    The poster may be developed using Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, or other creative and graphic applications, but **must be saved and submitted as a .PDF file**. Images of posters made by hand are not permitted.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] ACADEMIC POSTER

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Develop a one-page academic poster or infographic to showcase your research. Offer a comparison of the two characteristics you chose, using the research you completed during your previous Research Diary Log assignments. Explain the results of your research and conclude with a proposal for how the tw…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Develop a one-page academic poster or infographic to showcase your research. Offer a comparison of the two characteristics you chose, using the research you completed during your previous Research Diary Log assignments. Explain the results of your research and conclude with a proposal for how the two characteristics can be uniquely and meaningfully connected.

    Your poster or infographic should include headings, a brief description of your research findings, and tables or charts when appropriate. Posters should also include effective use of color, images, and clear fonts.

    The poster or infographic must include:

    1. Title
    2. An introduction of the two Profile characteristics
    3. Explanation and discussion of Profile Characteristic Number 1
    4. Explanation and discussion of Profile Characteristic Number 2
    5. Conclusion connecting the two Profile characteristics
    6. References list

    The poster may be developed using Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, or other creative and graphic applications, but **must be saved and submitted as a .PDF file**. Images of posters made by hand are not permitted.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Reading homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Class4Ass4.docx – ## Assignment3311.docx **## Class4Ass4.docx** HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include: · An explanation of the diagnosis. · The research question you developed using …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Class4Ass4.docx

    – ## Assignment3311.docx

    **## Class4Ass4.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    ·
    Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

    **## Class4Ass4.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    ·
    Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

    **## Class4Ass4.docx**

    HEART FAILURE and TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    ·
    Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    **## Assignment3311.docx**

    2

    **Assignment 3**

    Student’s Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Course Name

    Instructor’s Name

    Date

    **PICO(T) Process**

    The structured PICO(T) process develops targeted clinical questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T). Practitioners can use this framework to develop and arrange research question elements for literature searches and clinical judgments. PICO(T) helps healthcare practitioners assess intervention efficacy and use the best evidence to enhance patient outcomes.

    **Explanation of Diagnosis in Terms of Outcomes, Risks, and Complications**

    Chronic heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) typically coexist and negatively affect patient outcomes. They increase the risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and low quality of life when present simultaneously (Elendu et al., 2023). T2DM elevates Fh through insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients typically experience fluid overload, hypoglycemia, renal failure, and arrhythmias. Complex prescription regimens, dietary restrictions, and regular monitoring make managing chronic comorbidities difficult. Polypharmacy also leads to medication interactions and non-adherence. Poor control of T2DM blood glucose increases cardiac symptoms, while uncontrolled HF decreases exercise capacity and glycemic control. Adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and patient education drive treatment success. Symptom control, encouragement of adherence, and early complication detection are key interdisciplinary interventions to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize healthcare system burden.

    As a result of health disparities, comorbid HF and T2DM are more dangerous and difficult in susceptible patient groups like ethnic minorities, elderly adults, and those with low socioeconomic status. Limited access to care, financial issues, low health literacy, and cultural factors make complicated treatment regimens difficult for such patients. As such, they have higher prescription non-adherence, uncontrolled symptoms, hospital readmissions, and early mortality. For instance, African Americans and Hispanics have increased HF and T2DM rates but lower access to guideline-directed medications and follow-up appointments. These inequities delay diagnosis, poorly manage and accelerate illness development. Older people may also have cognitive, physical, or caregiving difficulties, increasing their risk. To enhance equity and health outcomes in these populations, culturally competent care, nurse-led education, and tailored interventions are needed.

    **PICO(T) Question**

    In adults diagnosed with both heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P), how does a nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program (I), compared to standard outpatient care (C), affect medication adherence and hospital readmission rates (O) over a six-month period (T?

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **PICO(T) Element** | **Component** |
    | **P** (Population) | Adults with comorbid heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
    | **I** (Intervention) | Nurse-led multidisciplinary education and follow-up program |
    | **C** (Comparison) | Standard outpatient care |
    | **O** (Outcome) | Medication adherence and hospital readmission rates |
    | **T** (Time) | Six months |

    **Literature Search**

    A systematic literature search identified current and high-quality primary research papers on medication adherence and hospital readmissions in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Due to their peer-reviewed clinical and nursing journal access, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were the leading search engines. Only research published during the recent five years (2020–2024) was sought to guarantee relevance and currency. Full-text, English-language articles on adult patients with both illnesses were necessary. To ensure the evidence represented direct treatments and measurable patient outcomes without synthesis or secondary analyses, only primary research papers, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included.

    Specific search terms were used to find related literature. Keywords included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, nurse-led intervention, hospital readmission, and patient education. Search results were narrowed using boolean operators “AND” and “OR” operators. For example, the search terms were “heart failure AND type 2 diabetes AND nurse-led intervention AND medication adherence AND hospital readmission.” First, abstracts were evaluated for population and intervention alignment. Articles about pediatric patients, non-nursing interventions, or outside 2020–2024 were omitted. The full texts of eligible papers were checked to confirm that the research design was a primary source, especially RCTs with high-level intervention efficacy evidence.

    Credibility was a key factor in choosing articles. Proper methodology, statistically significant results, and valid data collection methods, including proven adherence measuring instruments, were prioritized. Sample size, ethical approval, and intervention protocol clarity were examined in the studies. Peer-reviewed nursing, cardiology, and chronic illness management literature with high credibility were prioritized. The best studies were those by experienced physicians in various healthcare settings. The systematic search chose primary sources with applicability and scientific quality to inform recommendations to improve heart failure and type 2 diabetes care.

    **Evidence to Support PICO(T) Question**

    To address the PICO(T) question, three research papers that were diagnosis-specific were identified; Ghobadi et al. (2022), You et al. (2020), and Huesken et al. (2021). All three studies examined the effect of nurse-led intervention or multidisciplinary follow-up on medication adherence and hospital readmission in type 2 diabetes heart failure patients. The primary sources found that structured nursing interventions performed better than standard care, consistent with the PICO(T) population, intervention, comparison, and outcome dimensions.

    **Article summary**

    **Ghobadi et al. (2022)**

    **_Overview:_**

    In this randomized control trial, a multidisciplinary management program (MMP) was tested on medication adherence and symptom burden in heart failure (HF) patients with conditions including diabetes. 94 patients were randomized to control or intervention groups for eight weeks.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved three visits to a multi-professional clinic and a telephone follow-up with a nurse. A cardiologist, pharmacist, dietician/nutritionist, and nursing coordinator were involved. Medication adherence, symptom management, food, and lifestyle were taught. Each patient also received a "Living with Heart Failure." brochure.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed improved medication adherence and reduced symptom burden across all dimensions compared to the control group. Improvements were measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multidisciplinary post-discharge care and the nurse's involvement in the self-management of complex chronic illnesses, including HF and T2DM, were studied.

    **You et al. (2020)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This randomized control research examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led post-discharge care program for CHF patients in China. Over a 12-week follow-up, 152 individuals were randomly assigned to nurse-led or conventional treatment.

    **_Intervention:_**

    The intervention involved phone conversations, medication reviews, symptom monitoring, and personalized support with medication adherence and lifestyle adjustments. Discharge without follow-up is typical. Medication adherence, QoL, rehospitalization, and death were compared across groups.

    **_Findings:_**

    The intervention group showed increased medication adherence, improved QoL (SF-12 scores), and decreased rehospitalization and all-cause death rates compared to the control group. Drug adherence was confirmed by self-report and pharmacy refill data. Nursing interventions enhance patient outcomes and decrease CHF healthcare costs, especially in diabetics, according to studies.

    **Huesken et al. (2021)**

    **_Overview:_**

    This longitudinal study examined the short- and long-term effects of a one-hour nurse-led education session on self-care behavior and illness awareness in 150 hospitalized heart failure patients. The session covered heart function, heart failure causes, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle adjustments, and symptom management. Brochures and weight diaries strengthened education.

    **_Intervention_** _:_

    Patients had limited knowledge and poor self-care behaviors before the intervention. Self-care behavior and illness awareness increased dramatically one day after the session. The session had a lasting impact, as scores were much higher after 6 months. Self-care was measured with the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScB-9), and disease knowledge was examined with a six-item questionnaire.

    **_Findings:_**

    The study suggests that systematic, nurse-led education can enhance and maintain patient knowledge and behavior. To increase long-term drug adherence and prevent unfavorable outcomes, discharge planning should include nurse-led training.

    **Credibility and Relevance of the Articles**

    All three selected publications are peer-reviewed primary research studies published in respectable journals within the previous five years, meeting academic and clinical evidence-based practice requirements.

    The open-access, peer-reviewed BMC Nursing research by Ghobadi et al. (2022) is a randomized controlled trial. The study focused on interdisciplinary, nurse-led therapies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients. Its rigorous approach, proven instruments (e.g., Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), and statistically significant findings provide legitimacy and importance to the dual diagnosis.

    The Medical Science Monitor published a high-quality, randomized, controlled study by You et al. (2020) with a significant sample size. This study examined how a nurse-led program affected medication adherence and hospital readmissions in diabetic chronic heart failure patients. Structured follow-ups and clinical outcomes monitoring increase its relevance and rigor.

    Huesken et al. (2021), in the International Journal of Nursing Sciences, examine the long-term impact of nurse-led education on illness awareness and self-care. The findings validate the teaching component of the PICO(T) strategy and its durability over time, making it highly suitable for chronic illness treatment with various comorbidities.

    **Analysis of the Evidence and Answer to the PICO(T) Question**

    The three investigations strongly support the PICO(T) question. All studies found that nurse-led interventions, especially those with structured education, individualized follow-up, and multidisciplinary involvement, significantly improve medication adherence and hospital readmission rates in heart failure and type 2 diabetes patients.

    Ghobadi et al. found that interdisciplinary, nurse-led programs enhanced adherence and symptom management. In nurse-led outpatient care, You et al. (2020) established lower rehospitalization and death rates along with higher medication compliance. Similarly, Huesken et al. observed permanent changes in patient understanding and self-care practices, which affect medication adherence and exacerbations.

    Together, these investigations confirm PICO(T). This finding supports organized nurse-led interventions for complicated chronic disease management to improve long-term outcomes and reduce healthcare system load.

    **References**

    Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Ashna, M., Ross-Comptis, J., Ansong, S. O., Egbunu, E. O., Okafor, G. C., Jingwa, K. A., Akintunde, A. A., Ogah, C. M., Edeko, M. O., Ibitoye, A. V., Ogunseye, M. O., Chisom Euphemia Alakwe-Ojimba, Eunice Kosisochukwu Omeludike, Oguine, C. A., Afuh, R. N., Olawuni, C. A., & Ekwem, O. R. (2023). Heart failure and diabetes: Understanding the bidirectional relationship.
    _Medicine_,
    _102_(37), e34906–e34906.
    [https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906](https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034906)

    Ghobadi, P., Gholami, M., Hasanvand, S., Toulabi, T., Moradifar, N., & Birjandi, M. (2022). Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on symptom burden and medication adherence in heart failure patients with comorbidities: A randomized controlled trial.
    _BMC Nursing_,
    _21_(1).
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01130-7)

    Huesken, A., Hoffmann, R., & Ayed, S. (2021). Persistent effect of nurse-led education on self-care behavior and disease knowledge in heart failure patients.
    _International Journal of Nursing Sciences_,
    _8_(2), 161–167.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.002)

    You, J., Wang, S., Li, J., & Luo, Y. (2020). Usefulness of a Nurse-Led Program of Care for Management of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    _Medical Science Monitor_,
    _26_.
    [https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469](https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.920469)

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.