Assignment Prompt & Instructions
SEE ATTACHED
– 2 years ago
**files (2)**
– ## WEEK3RCAPLITINFO.docx
– ## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed.docx
**## WEEK3RCAPLITINFO.docx**
**Respond to peer discussion regard Consulting with the Federal Government on Workforce Planning of their organization. Cite 2 scholarly authors. APA FORMAT. GRADUATE RUBIC.**
1A.
In strategic workforce planning, Google must assess several critical factors when consulting with the federal government. First, senior managers should determine the availability of skilled labor by particular technology and the skills needed for future growth. To stay relevant in the world of technology, meaning artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), Google's workforce must continue to evolve, and an investment in training and development (T&D) must be made on an ongoing basis (Li, 2024). Second, Google should evaluate diversity and inclusion policies to ensure the workforce is fair and equitable in a competitive global environment.
Google's barriers to change could be resistance to organizational change, especially since it is such a cutting-edge and rooted culture. Its employees might be suspicious of organizational design or leadership changes, and large-scale change might have to overcome ingrained norms. Finally, any changes would need to comply with the intricate legal rules at the federal level, which could provide bureaucratic obstacles to execution.
Several key factors must be considered when designing work systems at Google. First, flexibility in the work environment is essential. Future designs should integrate the existing flexibility features, such as remote and hybrid work options, which Google already offers to its employees (Albrecht et al., 2022). A work system design requires advanced technological integration because it enhances operational efficiency through artificial intelligence tools that improve decision-making and productivity (Mello, 2019). Work system design heavily relies on technological elements because they create innovation possibilities and self-directed operational effectiveness for employees.
In conclusion, Google's workforce planning and work system design must adopt technologies while maintaining a diverse, flexible workforce. Although some hurdles could be resistance to change and regulatory constraints, the company's initiative to innovate makes it likely to be successful in the long term.
**References**
Albrecht, S. L., Connaughton, S., & Leiter, M. P. (2022). The influence of change-related organizational and job resources on employee change engagement.
_Frontiers in Psychology_,
_13_, 910206.
[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234385/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234385/)
Li, L. (2024). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for Industry 4.0 and beyond.
_Information Systems Frontiers_,
_26_(5), 1697-1712.
Mello, J.A. (2019). Strategic human resource management (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc. ISBN-13:978-1-337-61999-8
**1B.** Toyota Motor Corporation's strategic workforce planning requires thoughtful consultation with the federal government, careful examination of key factors by senior management, and recognition of potential implementation obstacles. For effective federal consultation, Toyota should establish a dedicated Government Relations Task Force comprising HR executives, legal counsel, and government affairs specialists to lead communication with federal agencies (Mello, 2023). This team would engage with the Department of Labor to discuss workforce development initiatives, apprenticeship programs, and available grants for training workers in advanced manufacturing and electric vehicle production. Toyota should also consult with the Department of Commerce's Manufacturing Extension Partnership to explore federal support for technology adoption and participate in federal workforce development boards to gain insights into emerging policies. Additionally, collaboration with the Department of Education would support the development of specialized curricula for community colleges and technical schools that align with Toyota's future workforce needs, particularly in advanced manufacturing, robotics, and electric vehicle technologies. According to Mello (2023), "Strategic workforce planning must integrate federal policy considerations and available resources to maximize organizational effectiveness in regulated industries" (p. 142).
Toyota's senior managers must examine several critical factors when developing strategic workforce plans. The impact of technological transformation toward electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and digitalization will fundamentally reshape workforce requirements across all organizational levels. Demographic shifts present another critical consideration, including the aging of experienced manufacturing workers and the different work preferences of younger generations. Geographic distribution of talent pools relative to Toyota's facilities requires examination to identify potential mismatches between talent availability and location needs. Conducting detailed skills gap analyses comparing current workforce capabilities with projected future requirements in software development, data science, and battery technology will be essential for proactive development initiatives. Additionally, McKinsey & Company (2023) notes that automotive manufacturers must assess competitiveness in talent markets against both traditional competitors and technology companies that increasingly compete for similar talent pools.
Several significant obstacles may arise when implementing strategic workforce changes at Toyota. Cultural resistance represents a primary challenge, as Toyota's strong corporate culture built around the Toyota Production System may create barriers to adopting new work methodologies required for digital transformation. The legacy manufacturing mindset among long-tenured employees may impede the transition to more software-centric and agile development approaches. Knowledge transfer challenges emerge as experienced workers retire, creating difficulties in transferring tacit knowledge to newer employees. Established organizational structures may form silos that hinder the cross-functional collaboration necessary for integrated product development. As Ulrich and Dulebohn (2023) emphasize, "Traditional automotive organizational structures often struggle to adapt to digital transformation, requiring deliberate restructuring of reporting relationships and work processes" (p. 38).
For Toyota, critical factors in work system design include effective integration of human workers with increasingly advanced robotics and automation systems. Creating flexible production capabilities that can rapidly adapt to changing product mixes becomes essential as Toyota transitions from internal combustion engines to a diverse portfolio including hybrid and electric vehicles. Developing robust knowledge management systems supports operational consistency and continuous improvement across generations of workers. Work systems must also facilitate cross-functional collaboration, particularly as traditional boundaries blur between mechanical engineering, electrical systems, and software development. Environmental sustainability considerations should be integrated into work system design to reduce waste and energy consumption consistent with Toyota's corporate values and regulatory requirements (Society for Human Resource Management, 2023).
Technology plays a transformative role in Toyota's work system design across multiple dimensions. The implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies including IoT sensors, real-time monitoring systems, and predictive maintenance capabilities is revolutionizing production systems. Digital twin implementation creates virtual representations of physical manufacturing processes, enabling simulation and optimization before physical implementation. Artificial intelligence applications in quality control and process optimization are transforming work by automating routine decisions and highlighting areas requiring human judgment. The introduction of collaborative robots working alongside human workers redefines job roles and creates new human-machine partnerships. According to Mello (2023), "Effective work system design in modern manufacturing must account for the integration of traditional production processes with advanced digital technologies, creating new skill requirements and working relationships" (p. 267). Augmented reality technologies provide real-time information overlaid on physical work environments, transforming training approaches and enabling less experienced workers to perform complex tasks with guidance.
In conclusion, Toyota's strategic workforce planning requires systematic consultation with federal agencies, careful examination of workforce factors, and recognition of implementation challenges. Designing effective work systems requires balancing traditional manufacturing excellence with technological innovation, while technology itself continues to reshape how work is performed, managed, and improved throughout the organization. By addressing these considerations holistically, Toyota can position itself for continued success in a rapidly evolving automotive industry.
References:
McKinsey & Company. (2023). Reskilling in the age of AI. McKinsey Global Institute.
Mello, J. A. (2023). Strategic human resource management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2023). Future of work: Preparing for disruption. SHRM Research Report.
Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2023). Human resource management in the digital era. Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 26-42.
**1C.**
**Review two academic/scholarly sources**,
**AND course text**,
**Mello, J. A. (2023). Strategic human resource management (6th ed.).** Cengage Learning.
and your research to answer the following question.
_Regarding the company_ **(AMAZON** _)you have chosen this term for your research,_
**A. Share how Hofstede’s cultural dimensions might result in specific kinds of HR programs and practices.**
**B. Present facts and information from outside sources ON AMAZON**
**Information and Literature Review**.
**## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed.docx**
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
**Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**
LEAVE A BLANK SPACE
## Your Name
**Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab
Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell
Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020
**Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**
My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:
1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.
2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.
3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.
4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.
5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.
6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.
**Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.
**Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**
**Abstract [Centered, Bold]**
Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
_Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.
_Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.
The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.
****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
**one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.
**All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**
You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).
**New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**
**_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**
Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
_every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.
**_Second Rule_**
The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
_first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
_each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.
**Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.
**Punctuating In-Text Citations**
So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
_before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
_after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:
Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
_only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
_after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)
If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]
**References [Centered, Bold]**
Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
_Publication Name_,
_234_(2), 40-190.
[https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)
Surname, C. C. (Year).
_This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)
REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |
**## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed.docx**
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
**Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**
LEAVE A BLANK SPACE
## Your Name
**Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab
Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell
Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020
**Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**
My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:
1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.
2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.
3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.
4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.
5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.
6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.
**Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.
**Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**
**Abstract [Centered, Bold]**
Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
_Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.
_Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.
The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.
****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
**one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.
**All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**
You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).
**New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**
**_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**
Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
_every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.
**_Second Rule_**
The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
_first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
_each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.
**Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.
**Punctuating In-Text Citations**
So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
_before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
_after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:
Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
_only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
_after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)
If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]
**References [Centered, Bold]**
Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
_Publication Name_,
_234_(2), 40-190.
[https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)
Surname, C. C. (Year).
_This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)
REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |
**## WEEK3RCAPLITINFO.docx**
**Respond to peer discussion regard Consulting with the Federal Government on Workforce Planning of their organization. Cite 2 scholarly authors. APA FORMAT. GRADUATE RUBIC.**
1A.
In strategic workforce planning, Google must assess several critical factors when consulting with the federal government. First, senior managers should determine the availability of skilled labor by particular technology and the skills needed for future growth. To stay relevant in the world of technology, meaning artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), Google's workforce must continue to evolve, and an investment in training and development (T&D) must be made on an ongoing basis (Li, 2024). Second, Google should evaluate diversity and inclusion policies to ensure the workforce is fair and equitable in a competitive global environment.
Google's barriers to change could be resistance to organizational change, especially since it is such a cutting-edge and rooted culture. Its employees might be suspicious of organizational design or leadership changes, and large-scale change might have to overcome ingrained norms. Finally, any changes would need to comply with the intricate legal rules at the federal level, which could provide bureaucratic obstacles to execution.
Several key factors must be considered when designing work systems at Google. First, flexibility in the work environment is essential. Future designs should integrate the existing flexibility features, such as remote and hybrid work options, which Google already offers to its employees (Albrecht et al., 2022). A work system design requires advanced technological integration because it enhances operational efficiency through artificial intelligence tools that improve decision-making and productivity (Mello, 2019). Work system design heavily relies on technological elements because they create innovation possibilities and self-directed operational effectiveness for employees.
In conclusion, Google's workforce planning and work system design must adopt technologies while maintaining a diverse, flexible workforce. Although some hurdles could be resistance to change and regulatory constraints, the company's initiative to innovate makes it likely to be successful in the long term.
**References**
Albrecht, S. L., Connaughton, S., & Leiter, M. P. (2022). The influence of change-related organizational and job resources on employee change engagement.
_Frontiers in Psychology_,
_13_, 910206.
[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234385/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234385/)
Li, L. (2024). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for Industry 4.0 and beyond.
_Information Systems Frontiers_,
_26_(5), 1697-1712.
Mello, J.A. (2019). Strategic human resource management (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc. ISBN-13:978-1-337-61999-8
**1B.** Toyota Motor Corporation's strategic workforce planning requires thoughtful consultation with the federal government, careful examination of key factors by senior management, and recognition of potential implementation obstacles. For effective federal consultation, Toyota should establish a dedicated Government Relations Task Force comprising HR executives, legal counsel, and government affairs specialists to lead communication with federal agencies (Mello, 2023). This team would engage with the Department of Labor to discuss workforce development initiatives, apprenticeship programs, and available grants for training workers in advanced manufacturing and electric vehicle production. Toyota should also consult with the Department of Commerce's Manufacturing Extension Partnership to explore federal support for technology adoption and participate in federal workforce development boards to gain insights into emerging policies. Additionally, collaboration with the Department of Education would support the development of specialized curricula for community colleges and technical schools that align with Toyota's future workforce needs, particularly in advanced manufacturing, robotics, and electric vehicle technologies. According to Mello (2023), "Strategic workforce planning must integrate federal policy considerations and available resources to maximize organizational effectiveness in regulated industries" (p. 142).
Toyota's senior managers must examine several critical factors when developing strategic workforce plans. The impact of technological transformation toward electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and digitalization will fundamentally reshape workforce requirements across all organizational levels. Demographic shifts present another critical consideration, including the aging of experienced manufacturing workers and the different work preferences of younger generations. Geographic distribution of talent pools relative to Toyota's facilities requires examination to identify potential mismatches between talent availability and location needs. Conducting detailed skills gap analyses comparing current workforce capabilities with projected future requirements in software development, data science, and battery technology will be essential for proactive development initiatives. Additionally, McKinsey & Company (2023) notes that automotive manufacturers must assess competitiveness in talent markets against both traditional competitors and technology companies that increasingly compete for similar talent pools.
Several significant obstacles may arise when implementing strategic workforce changes at Toyota. Cultural resistance represents a primary challenge, as Toyota's strong corporate culture built around the Toyota Production System may create barriers to adopting new work methodologies required for digital transformation. The legacy manufacturing mindset among long-tenured employees may impede the transition to more software-centric and agile development approaches. Knowledge transfer challenges emerge as experienced workers retire, creating difficulties in transferring tacit knowledge to newer employees. Established organizational structures may form silos that hinder the cross-functional collaboration necessary for integrated product development. As Ulrich and Dulebohn (2023) emphasize, "Traditional automotive organizational structures often struggle to adapt to digital transformation, requiring deliberate restructuring of reporting relationships and work processes" (p. 38).
For Toyota, critical factors in work system design include effective integration of human workers with increasingly advanced robotics and automation systems. Creating flexible production capabilities that can rapidly adapt to changing product mixes becomes essential as Toyota transitions from internal combustion engines to a diverse portfolio including hybrid and electric vehicles. Developing robust knowledge management systems supports operational consistency and continuous improvement across generations of workers. Work systems must also facilitate cross-functional collaboration, particularly as traditional boundaries blur between mechanical engineering, electrical systems, and software development. Environmental sustainability considerations should be integrated into work system design to reduce waste and energy consumption consistent with Toyota's corporate values and regulatory requirements (Society for Human Resource Management, 2023).
Technology plays a transformative role in Toyota's work system design across multiple dimensions. The implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies including IoT sensors, real-time monitoring systems, and predictive maintenance capabilities is revolutionizing production systems. Digital twin implementation creates virtual representations of physical manufacturing processes, enabling simulation and optimization before physical implementation. Artificial intelligence applications in quality control and process optimization are transforming work by automating routine decisions and highlighting areas requiring human judgment. The introduction of collaborative robots working alongside human workers redefines job roles and creates new human-machine partnerships. According to Mello (2023), "Effective work system design in modern manufacturing must account for the integration of traditional production processes with advanced digital technologies, creating new skill requirements and working relationships" (p. 267). Augmented reality technologies provide real-time information overlaid on physical work environments, transforming training approaches and enabling less experienced workers to perform complex tasks with guidance.
In conclusion, Toyota's strategic workforce planning requires systematic consultation with federal agencies, careful examination of workforce factors, and recognition of implementation challenges. Designing effective work systems requires balancing traditional manufacturing excellence with technological innovation, while technology itself continues to reshape how work is performed, managed, and improved throughout the organization. By addressing these considerations holistically, Toyota can position itself for continued success in a rapidly evolving automotive industry.
References:
McKinsey & Company. (2023). Reskilling in the age of AI. McKinsey Global Institute.
Mello, J. A. (2023). Strategic human resource management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2023). Future of work: Preparing for disruption. SHRM Research Report.
Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2023). Human resource management in the digital era. Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 26-42.
**1C.**
**Review two academic/scholarly sources**,
**AND course text**,
**Mello, J. A. (2023). Strategic human resource management (6th ed.).** Cengage Learning.
and your research to answer the following question.
_Regarding the company_ **(AMAZON** _)you have chosen this term for your research,_
**A. Share how Hofstede’s cultural dimensions might result in specific kinds of HR programs and practices.**
**B. Present facts and information from outside sources ON AMAZON**
**Information and Literature Review**.
**## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed.docx**
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
**Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**
LEAVE A BLANK SPACE
## Your Name
**Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab
Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell
Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020
**Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**
My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:
1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.
2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.
3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.
4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.
5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.
6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.
**Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.
**Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**
**Abstract [Centered, Bold]**
Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
_Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.
_Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.
The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.
****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
**one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.
**All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**
You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).
**New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**
**_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**
Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
_every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.
**_Second Rule_**
The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
_first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
_each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.
**Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.
**Punctuating In-Text Citations**
So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
_before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
_after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:
Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
_only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
_after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)
If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]
**References [Centered, Bold]**
Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
_Publication Name_,
_234_(2), 40-190.
[https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)
Surname, C. C. (Year).
_This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)
REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |
**## WEEK3RCAPLITINFO.docx**
**Respond to peer discussion regard Consulting with the Federal Government on Workforce Planning of their organization. Cite 2 scholarly authors. APA FORMAT. GRADUATE RUBIC.**
1A.
In strategic workforce planning, Google must assess several critical factors when consulting with the federal government. First, senior managers should determine the availability of skilled labor by particular technology and the skills needed for future growth. To stay relevant in the world of technology, meaning artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), Google's workforce must continue to evolve, and an investment in training and development (T&D) must be made on an ongoing basis (Li, 2024). Second, Google should evaluate diversity and inclusion policies to ensure the workforce is fair and equitable in a competitive global environment.
Google's barriers to change could be resistance to organizational change, especially since it is such a cutting-edge and rooted culture. Its employees might be suspicious of organizational design or leadership changes, and large-scale change might have to overcome ingrained norms. Finally, any changes would need to comply with the intricate legal rules at the federal level, which could provide bureaucratic obstacles to execution.
Several key factors must be considered when designing work systems at Google. First, flexibility in the work environment is essential. Future designs should integrate the existing flexibility features, such as remote and hybrid work options, which Google already offers to its employees (Albrecht et al., 2022). A work system design requires advanced technological integration because it enhances operational efficiency through artificial intelligence tools that improve decision-making and productivity (Mello, 2019). Work system design heavily relies on technological elements because they create innovation possibilities and self-directed operational effectiveness for employees.
In conclusion, Google's workforce planning and work system design must adopt technologies while maintaining a diverse, flexible workforce. Although some hurdles could be resistance to change and regulatory constraints, the company's initiative to innovate makes it likely to be successful in the long term.
**References**
Albrecht, S. L., Connaughton, S., & Leiter, M. P. (2022). The influence of change-related organizational and job resources on employee change engagement.
_Frontiers in Psychology_,
_13_, 910206.
[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234385/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234385/)
Li, L. (2024). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for Industry 4.0 and beyond.
_Information Systems Frontiers_,
_26_(5), 1697-1712.
Mello, J.A. (2019). Strategic human resource management (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc. ISBN-13:978-1-337-61999-8
**1B.** Toyota Motor Corporation's strategic workforce planning requires thoughtful consultation with the federal government, careful examination of key factors by senior management, and recognition of potential implementation obstacles. For effective federal consultation, Toyota should establish a dedicated Government Relations Task Force comprising HR executives, legal counsel, and government affairs specialists to lead communication with federal agencies (Mello, 2023). This team would engage with the Department of Labor to discuss workforce development initiatives, apprenticeship programs, and available grants for training workers in advanced manufacturing and electric vehicle production. Toyota should also consult with the Department of Commerce's Manufacturing Extension Partnership to explore federal support for technology adoption and participate in federal workforce development boards to gain insights into emerging policies. Additionally, collaboration with the Department of Education would support the development of specialized curricula for community colleges and technical schools that align with Toyota's future workforce needs, particularly in advanced manufacturing, robotics, and electric vehicle technologies. According to Mello (2023), "Strategic workforce planning must integrate federal policy considerations and available resources to maximize organizational effectiveness in regulated industries" (p. 142).
Toyota's senior managers must examine several critical factors when developing strategic workforce plans. The impact of technological transformation toward electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and digitalization will fundamentally reshape workforce requirements across all organizational levels. Demographic shifts present another critical consideration, including the aging of experienced manufacturing workers and the different work preferences of younger generations. Geographic distribution of talent pools relative to Toyota's facilities requires examination to identify potential mismatches between talent availability and location needs. Conducting detailed skills gap analyses comparing current workforce capabilities with projected future requirements in software development, data science, and battery technology will be essential for proactive development initiatives. Additionally, McKinsey & Company (2023) notes that automotive manufacturers must assess competitiveness in talent markets against both traditional competitors and technology companies that increasingly compete for similar talent pools.
Several significant obstacles may arise when implementing strategic workforce changes at Toyota. Cultural resistance represents a primary challenge, as Toyota's strong corporate culture built around the Toyota Production System may create barriers to adopting new work methodologies required for digital transformation. The legacy manufacturing mindset among long-tenured employees may impede the transition to more software-centric and agile development approaches. Knowledge transfer challenges emerge as experienced workers retire, creating difficulties in transferring tacit knowledge to newer employees. Established organizational structures may form silos that hinder the cross-functional collaboration necessary for integrated product development. As Ulrich and Dulebohn (2023) emphasize, "Traditional automotive organizational structures often struggle to adapt to digital transformation, requiring deliberate restructuring of reporting relationships and work processes" (p. 38).
For Toyota, critical factors in work system design include effective integration of human workers with increasingly advanced robotics and automation systems. Creating flexible production capabilities that can rapidly adapt to changing product mixes becomes essential as Toyota transitions from internal combustion engines to a diverse portfolio including hybrid and electric vehicles. Developing robust knowledge management systems supports operational consistency and continuous improvement across generations of workers. Work systems must also facilitate cross-functional collaboration, particularly as traditional boundaries blur between mechanical engineering, electrical systems, and software development. Environmental sustainability considerations should be integrated into work system design to reduce waste and energy consumption consistent with Toyota's corporate values and regulatory requirements (Society for Human Resource Management, 2023).
Technology plays a transformative role in Toyota's work system design across multiple dimensions. The implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies including IoT sensors, real-time monitoring systems, and predictive maintenance capabilities is revolutionizing production systems. Digital twin implementation creates virtual representations of physical manufacturing processes, enabling simulation and optimization before physical implementation. Artificial intelligence applications in quality control and process optimization are transforming work by automating routine decisions and highlighting areas requiring human judgment. The introduction of collaborative robots working alongside human workers redefines job roles and creates new human-machine partnerships. According to Mello (2023), "Effective work system design in modern manufacturing must account for the integration of traditional production processes with advanced digital technologies, creating new skill requirements and working relationships" (p. 267). Augmented reality technologies provide real-time information overlaid on physical work environments, transforming training approaches and enabling less experienced workers to perform complex tasks with guidance.
In conclusion, Toyota's strategic workforce planning requires systematic consultation with federal agencies, careful examination of workforce factors, and recognition of implementation challenges. Designing effective work systems requires balancing traditional manufacturing excellence with technological innovation, while technology itself continues to reshape how work is performed, managed, and improved throughout the organization. By addressing these considerations holistically, Toyota can position itself for continued success in a rapidly evolving automotive industry.
References:
McKinsey & Company. (2023). Reskilling in the age of AI. McKinsey Global Institute.
Mello, J. A. (2023). Strategic human resource management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2023). Future of work: Preparing for disruption. SHRM Research Report.
Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2023). Human resource management in the digital era. Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 26-42.
**1C.**
**Review two academic/scholarly sources**,
**AND course text**,
**Mello, J. A. (2023). Strategic human resource management (6th ed.).** Cengage Learning.
and your research to answer the following question.
_Regarding the company_ **(AMAZON** _)you have chosen this term for your research,_
**A. Share how Hofstede’s cultural dimensions might result in specific kinds of HR programs and practices.**
**B. Present facts and information from outside sources ON AMAZON**
**Information and Literature Review**.
**## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed.docx**
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1
**Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**
LEAVE A BLANK SPACE
## Your Name
**Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab
Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell
Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020
**Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**
My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:
1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.
2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.
3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.
4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.
5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.
6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.
**Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.
**Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**
**Abstract [Centered, Bold]**
Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
_Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.
_Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.
The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.
****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
**one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.
**All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**
You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).
**New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**
**_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**
Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
_every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.
**_Second Rule_**
The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
_first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
_each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.
**Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.
**Punctuating In-Text Citations**
So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
_before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
_after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:
Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
_only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
_after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)
If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]
**References [Centered, Bold]**
Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
_Publication Name_,
_234_(2), 40-190.
[https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)
Surname, C. C. (Year).
_This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)
REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| | | |