Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] WK 4 RES.EPID

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WK4DISEPID.docx **## WK4DISEPID.docx** Back to Week at a Glance Randomized Trials in Epidemiology ![A blue glove and yellow and white mat AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-4-res-epid) Imagine that researchers are conducti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK4DISEPID.docx

    **## WK4DISEPID.docx**

    Back to Week at a Glance

    Randomized Trials in Epidemiology

    ![A blue glove and yellow and white mat AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-4-res-epid)

    Imagine that researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a high-fiber supplement as a preventive measure in persons at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. People enrolled in the study are disease free at the time they agree to participate in the trial, but they all have a family history of type 2 diabetes and are considered at high risk (80%) to develop the disease during their lifetime. The 10,000 participants who start the trial are healthy individuals who are randomly allocated to receive either high-fiber supplements or placebo for several years. As you can imagine, this study will be quite expensive and will require a large infrastructure of personnel and materials to carry it out successfully.

    Because type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, the potential benefits of this research are important at a population level. Unfortunately, high-fiber supplements have also been shown in a few studies to be associated with gastrointestinal blockage (which can be life-threatening) and reduced nutrient absorption, which may lead to anemia, osteoporosis, and other debilitating chronic diseases. The supplements may also reduce absorption of certain medications and cause gastrointestinal distress. The potential side effects of continuous high-fiber supplementation are only partially understood, and long-term effects are unknown.

    For this Discussion, you are asked to identify an example of an experimental study design in the literature and consider the ethical implications of the randomized controlled trial design.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259801)

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/pages/week-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=6259801)

    · Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024).
    _Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice_ (4th ed.). Springer.

    · Chapter 2, “Identifying Outcomes in Population-Based Nursing” (pp. 20-38)

    · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021).
    _Epidemiology for public health practice_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    · Chapter 8, “Experimental Study Designs”

    · Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018).
    [Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentationLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=mnh&AN=29482537&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _BMC Medical Ethics_,
    _19_(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x

    · Walden University Office of Research and Doctoral Services. (n.d.).
    [_Developing researchLinks to an external site._](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/student-research/developing-research) _._ https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/student-research/developing-research

    Examples of Studies Utilizing Experimental and Quasi-experimental Study Designs

    These studies should be used as informative examples. Please locate another article on your own to use for the Discussion.

    · Hooshmand, M., & Foronda, C. (2018).
    [Comparison of telemedicine to traditional face-to-face care for children with special needs: A quasiexperimental study](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/files/12410801?wrap=1).
    _Telemedicine Journal and E-health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association_,
    _24_(6), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0116

    · Sawyer, A., Kaim, A., Le, H.-N., McDonald, D., Mittinty, M., Lynch, J., & Sawyer, M. (2019).
    [The effectiveness of an app-based nurse-moderated program for new mothers with depression and parenting problems (eMums Plus): Pragmatic randomized controlled trialLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=mnh&AN=31165715&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Journal of Medical Internet Research_,
    _21_(6), e13689. https://doi.org/10.2196/13689

    [Optional Resource](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/pages/week-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=6259801)

    · Dennis, C. L., Grigoriadis, S., Zupancic, J., Kiss, A., & Ravitz, P. (2020).
    [Telephone-based nurse-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: Nationwide randomised controlled trialLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2020-09802-001&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _The British Journal of Psychiatry_,
    _216_(4), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.275

    To prepare:

    · Search databases in the Walden Library and locate a peer-reviewed article from the last 5 years that uses a randomized controlled trial study design. The subject of the study may be any topic professionally relevant or interesting to your practice. You may not select an article already posted by one of your colleagues for this Discussion. (
    **Tip:** When searching, you may use “randomized trial” as one of your search phrases.)

    · Critically analyze the following aspects of the research study:

    · Purpose

    · Study population

    · Length of the trial

    · Data collection methods

    · Outcome measures

    · Results and conclusions

    · Ethical issues associated with the study

    · Ask yourself: How did this research study benefit from its experimental design? What was achieved by randomization that might not otherwise have been achieved?

    By Day 3 of Week 4

    **Post** a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

    · Summarize the research study addressing the aspects bulleted above.

    · Identify and discuss the ethical issues associated with this study.

    · Be sure to include a link to the article in your post.

    By Day 6 of Week 4

    **Respond** to
    **at least two** colleagues on
    **two different days** in one or more of the following ways:

    · Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.

    · Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

    · Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.

    · Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

    · Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

    · Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

    RESPOND TO THIS POST

    ·
    **DENISE**

    ·

    ·
    **Evaluating the PRO-P Trial Design Summarized**

    · I examined the PRO-P study by Al-Monajjed and colleagues (2024), which investigates how electronic symptom tracking might benefit prostate cancer patients after surgery.

    ·
    **Study Summary**

    · The researchers designed this randomized controlled trial to see if electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring improves quality of life for men recovering from prostate surgery. Their hypothesis makes intuitive sense—if doctors can spot complications earlier through digital monitoring, patients should experience better recovery.

    · The study will include 430 men preparing for radical prostatectomy across multiple German hospitals. I appreciate that they've set clear eligibility requirements—participants need to be adults who can provide informed consent, understand German, and use the necessary technology. Each man will be followed for 6 months after surgery, with checkpoints before the procedure, at discharge, and at 1, 3, and 6 months afterward.

    · The data collection approach is straightforward but effective. Both groups complete the same electronic questionnaires about their symptoms and wellbeing, but only the intervention group's responses trigger alerts to healthcare providers when symptoms appear. Their primary goal is measuring quality of life at the 6-month mark using a standardized questionnaire, along with tracking several secondary outcomes like symptom severity and healthcare utilization. Since this is only a protocol paper, we don't have results yet, but the research team expects electronic monitoring to lead to better

    · symptom management and recovery experiences.

    · Ethical Considerations

    · I was astonished by how thoroughly the researchers addressed ethical concerns. As Goldstein et al. (2018) recommend for such trials, they obtained proper ethics committee approval and implemented comprehensive informed consent procedures. Both groups receive standard medical care, maintaining what researchers call "clinical equipoise," with the intervention group receiving additional monitoring. They've also taken steps to protect patient data.

    · I question the potential access disparities. The technology requirements might unintentionally exclude older patients or those less comfortable with digital tools. There's also the question of whether withholding potentially beneficial monitoring from the control group raises ethical concerns, though this is an inherent challenge in many clinical trials.

    · Benefits of Experimental Design

    · What makes this study particularly valuable is its randomized controlled design. As Friis and Sellers (2021) explain, randomization allows researchers to determine if the electronic monitoring causes improvements. By randomly assigning patients to groups, factors like age, disease severity, and technological comfort are distributed evenly.

    · Without this random assignment, the results would be far less reliable—tech-savvy patients might naturally gravitate toward the electronic monitoring option, skewing outcomes. The randomized approach ensures that any improvements in recovery can be credited to the monitoring system itself rather than pre-existing differences between patients.This methodically designed study could provide healthcare providers with evidence they need to implement electronic symptom monitoring as a standard practice in prostate

    · cancer care.

    · The article can be accessed at:
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8)

    · References

    · Al-Monajjed, R., Albers, P., Droop, J., Fugmann, D., Noldus, J., Palisaar, R.-J., Ritter, M., Ellinger, J., Krausewitz, P., Truß, M., Hadaschik, B., Grünwald, V., Schrader, A.-J., Papavassilis, P., Ernstmann, N., Schellenberger, B., Moritz, A., Kowalski, C., Hellmich, M., & Karger, A. (2024). PRO-P: Evaluating the effect of electronic patient-reported outcome measures monitoring compared with standard care in prostate cancer patients undergoing surgery-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 25(1), Article 754.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8)

    · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th

    · ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    · Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018). Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), Article 14.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x)

    ·

    **Reply**

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259788)

    [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259797)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK4DISEPID.docx**

    Back to Week at a Glance

    Randomized Trials in Epidemiology

    ![A blue glove and yellow and white mat AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-4-res-epid)

    Imagine that researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a high-fiber supplement as a preventive measure in persons at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. People enrolled in the study are disease free at the time they agree to participate in the trial, but they all have a family history of type 2 diabetes and are considered at high risk (80%) to develop the disease during their lifetime. The 10,000 participants who start the trial are healthy individuals who are randomly allocated to receive either high-fiber supplements or placebo for several years. As you can imagine, this study will be quite expensive and will require a large infrastructure of personnel and materials to carry it out successfully.

    Because type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, the potential benefits of this research are important at a population level. Unfortunately, high-fiber supplements have also been shown in a few studies to be associated with gastrointestinal blockage (which can be life-threatening) and reduced nutrient absorption, which may lead to anemia, osteoporosis, and other debilitating chronic diseases. The supplements may also reduce absorption of certain medications and cause gastrointestinal distress. The potential side effects of continuous high-fiber supplementation are only partially understood, and long-term effects are unknown.

    For this Discussion, you are asked to identify an example of an experimental study design in the literature and consider the ethical implications of the randomized controlled trial design.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259801)

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/pages/week-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=6259801)

    · Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024).
    _Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice_ (4th ed.). Springer.

    · Chapter 2, “Identifying Outcomes in Population-Based Nursing” (pp. 20-38)

    · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021).
    _Epidemiology for public health practice_ (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    · Chapter 8, “Experimental Study Designs”

    · Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018).
    [Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentationLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=mnh&AN=29482537&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _BMC Medical Ethics_,
    _19_(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x

    · Walden University Office of Research and Doctoral Services. (n.d.).
    [_Developing researchLinks to an external site._](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/student-research/developing-research) _._ https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/student-research/developing-research

    Examples of Studies Utilizing Experimental and Quasi-experimental Study Designs

    These studies should be used as informative examples. Please locate another article on your own to use for the Discussion.

    · Hooshmand, M., & Foronda, C. (2018).
    [Comparison of telemedicine to traditional face-to-face care for children with special needs: A quasiexperimental study](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/files/12410801?wrap=1).
    _Telemedicine Journal and E-health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association_,
    _24_(6), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0116

    · Sawyer, A., Kaim, A., Le, H.-N., McDonald, D., Mittinty, M., Lynch, J., & Sawyer, M. (2019).
    [The effectiveness of an app-based nurse-moderated program for new mothers with depression and parenting problems (eMums Plus): Pragmatic randomized controlled trialLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=mnh&AN=31165715&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _Journal of Medical Internet Research_,
    _21_(6), e13689. https://doi.org/10.2196/13689

    [Optional Resource](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/pages/week-4-learning-resources?module_item_id=6259801)

    · Dennis, C. L., Grigoriadis, S., Zupancic, J., Kiss, A., & Ravitz, P. (2020).
    [Telephone-based nurse-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: Nationwide randomised controlled trialLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2020-09802-001&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200).
    _The British Journal of Psychiatry_,
    _216_(4), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.275

    To prepare:

    · Search databases in the Walden Library and locate a peer-reviewed article from the last 5 years that uses a randomized controlled trial study design. The subject of the study may be any topic professionally relevant or interesting to your practice. You may not select an article already posted by one of your colleagues for this Discussion. (
    **Tip:** When searching, you may use “randomized trial” as one of your search phrases.)

    · Critically analyze the following aspects of the research study:

    · Purpose

    · Study population

    · Length of the trial

    · Data collection methods

    · Outcome measures

    · Results and conclusions

    · Ethical issues associated with the study

    · Ask yourself: How did this research study benefit from its experimental design? What was achieved by randomization that might not otherwise have been achieved?

    By Day 3 of Week 4

    **Post** a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

    · Summarize the research study addressing the aspects bulleted above.

    · Identify and discuss the ethical issues associated with this study.

    · Be sure to include a link to the article in your post.

    By Day 6 of Week 4

    **Respond** to
    **at least two** colleagues on
    **two different days** in one or more of the following ways:

    · Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.

    · Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

    · Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.

    · Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

    · Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

    · Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

    RESPOND TO THIS POST

    ·
    **DENISE**

    ·

    ·
    **Evaluating the PRO-P Trial Design Summarized**

    · I examined the PRO-P study by Al-Monajjed and colleagues (2024), which investigates how electronic symptom tracking might benefit prostate cancer patients after surgery.

    ·
    **Study Summary**

    · The researchers designed this randomized controlled trial to see if electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring improves quality of life for men recovering from prostate surgery. Their hypothesis makes intuitive sense—if doctors can spot complications earlier through digital monitoring, patients should experience better recovery.

    · The study will include 430 men preparing for radical prostatectomy across multiple German hospitals. I appreciate that they've set clear eligibility requirements—participants need to be adults who can provide informed consent, understand German, and use the necessary technology. Each man will be followed for 6 months after surgery, with checkpoints before the procedure, at discharge, and at 1, 3, and 6 months afterward.

    · The data collection approach is straightforward but effective. Both groups complete the same electronic questionnaires about their symptoms and wellbeing, but only the intervention group's responses trigger alerts to healthcare providers when symptoms appear. Their primary goal is measuring quality of life at the 6-month mark using a standardized questionnaire, along with tracking several secondary outcomes like symptom severity and healthcare utilization. Since this is only a protocol paper, we don't have results yet, but the research team expects electronic monitoring to lead to better

    · symptom management and recovery experiences.

    · Ethical Considerations

    · I was astonished by how thoroughly the researchers addressed ethical concerns. As Goldstein et al. (2018) recommend for such trials, they obtained proper ethics committee approval and implemented comprehensive informed consent procedures. Both groups receive standard medical care, maintaining what researchers call "clinical equipoise," with the intervention group receiving additional monitoring. They've also taken steps to protect patient data.

    · I question the potential access disparities. The technology requirements might unintentionally exclude older patients or those less comfortable with digital tools. There's also the question of whether withholding potentially beneficial monitoring from the control group raises ethical concerns, though this is an inherent challenge in many clinical trials.

    · Benefits of Experimental Design

    · What makes this study particularly valuable is its randomized controlled design. As Friis and Sellers (2021) explain, randomization allows researchers to determine if the electronic monitoring causes improvements. By randomly assigning patients to groups, factors like age, disease severity, and technological comfort are distributed evenly.

    · Without this random assignment, the results would be far less reliable—tech-savvy patients might naturally gravitate toward the electronic monitoring option, skewing outcomes. The randomized approach ensures that any improvements in recovery can be credited to the monitoring system itself rather than pre-existing differences between patients.This methodically designed study could provide healthcare providers with evidence they need to implement electronic symptom monitoring as a standard practice in prostate

    · cancer care.

    · The article can be accessed at:
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8)

    · References

    · Al-Monajjed, R., Albers, P., Droop, J., Fugmann, D., Noldus, J., Palisaar, R.-J., Ritter, M., Ellinger, J., Krausewitz, P., Truß, M., Hadaschik, B., Grünwald, V., Schrader, A.-J., Papavassilis, P., Ernstmann, N., Schellenberger, B., Moritz, A., Kowalski, C., Hellmich, M., & Karger, A. (2024). PRO-P: Evaluating the effect of electronic patient-reported outcome measures monitoring compared with standard care in prostate cancer patients undergoing surgery-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 25(1), Article 754.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08579-8)

    · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th

    · ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

    · Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018). Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), Article 14.
    [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x)

    ·

    **Reply**

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259788)

    [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259797)

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] W 3 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Will share the instructions with the right person – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Will share the instructions with the right person

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] W 3 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Will share the instructions with the right person – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Will share the instructions with the right person

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] urin6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Anatomy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-anatomy) check doc – 2 years ago – 11.5 **files (1)** – ## Urinary.docx **## Urinary.docx** **The Urinary System Chapter** After reading and studying this chapter, the successful student should be able to: 1. Name and describe the o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Anatomy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-anatomy)

    check doc

    – 2 years ago
    – 11.5

    **files (1)**

    – ## Urinary.docx

    **## Urinary.docx**

    **The Urinary System Chapter**

    After reading and studying this chapter, the successful student should be able to:

    1. Name and describe the organs of the urinary system and discuss the major functions of the system.

    2. Describe the gross structural features of the kidneys.

    3. Describe the internal anatomy of the kidneys and distinguish between cortical and juxtamedullary nephrons.

    4. Describe the regions of the nephron and collecting system, including their general functions and histological appearances.

    5. Trace the pathway of blood flow through a kidney and compare the patter of blood flow in cortical and juxtamedullary nephrons.

    6. Describe the structural features of the renal corpuscle and explain the functions of the filtration membrane components.

    7. List and describe the factors that influence glomerular filtration rates and filtrate production.

    8. Identify the types of transport mechanisms found along the PCT and DCT.

    9. Describe how hormones affect urine volume and concentrations.

    10. Summarize the major steps involved in water reabsorption and urine production.

    11. Describe the structures and functions of the ureters, urinary bladder, and urethra.

    12. Discuss the roles of local and central pathways in urination and describe the micturition reflex.

    13. Describe common urinary disorders related to output and frequency.

    14. Identify the distribution of water in the body and name the major cation and anion in each type of body fluid.

    15. Explain what is meant by fluid balance and discuss its importance for homeostasis.

    16. Summarize the relationship between sodium and water in maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance.

    17. Explain what is meant by mineral balance and discuss its importance for homeostasis.

    18. Explain factors that control potassium balance and discuss hypokalemia and hyperkalemia.

    19. Describe the regulation of calcium balance and the two hormones that control it.

    20. Describe the regulation of chloride and phosphate balance.

    21. Identify the homeostatic ranges for sodium, potassium, phosphate, chloride, magnesium, and protein.

    22. Explain the role of buffer systems in maintaining acid-base balance and pH.

    23. Describe the three chemical buffering systems and identify whether they buffer intracellular fluid or extracellular fluid.

    24. Name the weak acid and weak base for the three chemical buffering systems.

    25. Describe the compensatory mechanisms involved in the maintenance of acid-base balance.

    26. Describe respiratory acidosis and respiratory alkalosis including the causes and compensations.

    27. Describe metabolic acidosis and metabolic alkalosis including the causes and compensations.

    **## Urinary.docx**

    **The Urinary System Chapter**

    After reading and studying this chapter, the successful student should be able to:

    1. Name and describe the organs of the urinary system and discuss the major functions of the system.

    2. Describe the gross structural features of the kidneys.

    3. Describe the internal anatomy of the kidneys and distinguish between cortical and juxtamedullary nephrons.

    4. Describe the regions of the nephron and collecting system, including their general functions and histological appearances.

    5. Trace the pathway of blood flow through a kidney and compare the patter of blood flow in cortical and juxtamedullary nephrons.

    6. Describe the structural features of the renal corpuscle and explain the functions of the filtration membrane components.

    7. List and describe the factors that influence glomerular filtration rates and filtrate production.

    8. Identify the types of transport mechanisms found along the PCT and DCT.

    9. Describe how hormones affect urine volume and concentrations.

    10. Summarize the major steps involved in water reabsorption and urine production.

    11. Describe the structures and functions of the ureters, urinary bladder, and urethra.

    12. Discuss the roles of local and central pathways in urination and describe the micturition reflex.

    13. Describe common urinary disorders related to output and frequency.

    14. Identify the distribution of water in the body and name the major cation and anion in each type of body fluid.

    15. Explain what is meant by fluid balance and discuss its importance for homeostasis.

    16. Summarize the relationship between sodium and water in maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance.

    17. Explain what is meant by mineral balance and discuss its importance for homeostasis.

    18. Explain factors that control potassium balance and discuss hypokalemia and hyperkalemia.

    19. Describe the regulation of calcium balance and the two hormones that control it.

    20. Describe the regulation of chloride and phosphate balance.

    21. Identify the homeostatic ranges for sodium, potassium, phosphate, chloride, magnesium, and protein.

    22. Explain the role of buffer systems in maintaining acid-base balance and pH.

    23. Describe the three chemical buffering systems and identify whether they buffer intracellular fluid or extracellular fluid.

    24. Name the weak acid and weak base for the three chemical buffering systems.

    25. Describe the compensatory mechanisms involved in the maintenance of acid-base balance.

    26. Describe respiratory acidosis and respiratory alkalosis including the causes and compensations.

    27. Describe metabolic acidosis and metabolic alkalosis including the causes and compensations.

  • [Solved] SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need the project by Tuesday, March 25th to review it and prepare it. Thank you very much – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## EDF6224SupervisionCaseStudy3.pdf **## EDF6224SupervisionCaseStudy3.pdf** SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT In this course, you will complete a final project on identifying and res…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need the project by Tuesday, March 25th to review it and prepare it. Thank you very much

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## EDF6224SupervisionCaseStudy3.pdf

    **## EDF6224SupervisionCaseStudy3.pdf**

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    In this course, you will complete a final project on identifying and resolving supervisee/trainee

    performance issues in the workplace. The objective of this assignment will be to create a brief

    presentation that demonstrates your ability to pinpoint performance issues, identify potential

    solutions, and measure the success of an intervention.

    For this project, you will either:

    • Report a real-life performance issue experienced by yourself or colleagues, or

    • Create a hypothetical scenario of a performance issue in the workplace

    Using the Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Human Services (provided to you during Module

    7), you will analyze a pinpointed supervisee/trainee behavior from your situation/scenario and

    determine a potential intervention to implement and strategy for measuring success.

    You will present your assessment and intervention process via a 5-10 minute PowerPoint (or

    similar) presentation. You may choose to present via recording or live during your Module 9

    virtual live class. Both recorded and live presenters must submit their presentation slide decks

    in Canvas (preferably in exported PDF format), and both the slide decks and recorded

    presentations must be submitted at least 24 hours before the Module 9 live class.

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    1. Title Slide

    • Should include your name and general title of your presentation (e.g., Repeated Delay in

    Data Collection)

    2. Scenario Slide

    • Describe a staff performance issue you’ve observed or experienced or write a hypothetical

    scenario of a staff performance issue in the workplace. Include contextual information,

    including the setting, relevant relationships between individuals in the scenario/situation,

    and environmental variables that will help inform your PDC-HS process later.

    3. Pinpoint Slide:

    • Pinpoint the staff behavior of interest for increase or decrease. Ensure that your definition

    follows all the requirements of a high-quality pinpoint (measurable, observable, passes the

    “dead person’s” test, not a non-behavior, etc.) Please review content in Module 3 for a

    refresher on appropriate pinpoints.

    4. PDC-HS Slides (x4):

    • Conduct a mock PDC-HS related to your scenario and briefly describe your findings for each

    section on separate slides. You should have a slide each for:

    o Training

    o Task Clarification and Prompting

    o Resources, Materials, & Processes

    o Performance Consequences, Effort, and Competition

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    5. Intervention Slide:

    • Select the intervention that you believe will have the greatest impact on the behavior of the

    supervisee/trainee member. Provide a list of resources needed to implement the

    intervention (including people, time, funding, etc.), and a task analysis of the steps you

    would take to put the intervention in place.

    6. Measuring Success Slide:

    • Describe what data you would collect to determine if the intervention was successful and

    how you would collect those data. For a refresher on measurement strategies, please

    review the content from Module 3.

    Whether the presentation is recorded or live, it is expected that the presenter will speak clearly, so that all

    words are audible. It is also expected that the presenter will be prepared and articulate the information on

    the slides in a smooth and controlled manner (i.e., deliver pertinent information without long pauses or

    repetition of filler words).

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    Rubric – 100 Points

    Criteria 5 Points 3 Points 0 Points

    Presentation:

    The speaker was

    audible, and the

    presentation was
    submitted on time.

    All criteria met.

    One Criterion was

    met.

    No criteria were

    met.

    Criteria 5 Points 3 Points 0 Points

    Title Slide:

    Presentation title
    and student name

    clearly indicated

    All criteria met.

    One Criterion was

    met.

    No criteria were

    met.

    Criteria 10 Points 5 Points 0 Points

    Scenario Slide:
    Included relevant
    contextual
    information,
    including the setting,
    relevant
    relationships
    between individuals
    in the
    scenario/situation,
    and environmental
    variables.

    All criteria met.

    At least (50%) of

    the criteria were

    met.

    Less than 50% of

    criteria were met.

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    Pinpoint Slide:

    High-quality

    pinpoint was

    provided (e.g.,
    measurable,

    observable, and
    reliable)

    All criteria met.

    At least 66% of

    criteria met.

    Less than 66%

    of criteria met.

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    PDC-HS Slides (x4)

    Evidence of a

    completed PDC-HS
    describing each of

    the following areas
    on individual slides:

    1. Training

    2. Task Clarification

    and Prompting,

    3. Resources,
    Materials, and

    Processes

    4. Performance

    Consequences,

    Effort, and
    Competition

    All slides were

    present and

    supported.

    At least 50% of the

    slides were present

    and well supported

    or all slides were

    present but not well

    supported.

    Less than 50% of

    the slides were

    present or were

    poorly supported

    (i.e., no evidence

    PDC-HS was

    utilized)

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    Intervention Slide:

    A list of resources
    listed to implement
    the intervention
    (including people,
    time, funding, etc.),
    and a task analysis
    of intervention.

    All criteria met.

    Task analysis was

    present, but not

    comprehensive

    and/or resources

    were mentioned,

    but not adequate.

    Task analysis was

    not present or

    very weak and/or

    list of resources

    were not present.

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    Measuring success:

    A behavior analytic

    measurement and

    data collection
    procedure was

    described in a way
    it could be

    replicated.

    All criteria were

    met.

    At least 50% of

    criteria were met.

    Less than 50% of

    criteria were met.

    – Overview
    – Slide Deck Requirements:
    – Presentation Requirements
    – Rubric – 100 Points

    **## EDF6224SupervisionCaseStudy3.pdf**

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    In this course, you will complete a final project on identifying and resolving supervisee/trainee

    performance issues in the workplace. The objective of this assignment will be to create a brief

    presentation that demonstrates your ability to pinpoint performance issues, identify potential

    solutions, and measure the success of an intervention.

    For this project, you will either:

    • Report a real-life performance issue experienced by yourself or colleagues, or

    • Create a hypothetical scenario of a performance issue in the workplace

    Using the Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Human Services (provided to you during Module

    7), you will analyze a pinpointed supervisee/trainee behavior from your situation/scenario and

    determine a potential intervention to implement and strategy for measuring success.

    You will present your assessment and intervention process via a 5-10 minute PowerPoint (or

    similar) presentation. You may choose to present via recording or live during your Module 9

    virtual live class. Both recorded and live presenters must submit their presentation slide decks

    in Canvas (preferably in exported PDF format), and both the slide decks and recorded

    presentations must be submitted at least 24 hours before the Module 9 live class.

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    1. Title Slide

    • Should include your name and general title of your presentation (e.g., Repeated Delay in

    Data Collection)

    2. Scenario Slide

    • Describe a staff performance issue you’ve observed or experienced or write a hypothetical

    scenario of a staff performance issue in the workplace. Include contextual information,

    including the setting, relevant relationships between individuals in the scenario/situation,

    and environmental variables that will help inform your PDC-HS process later.

    3. Pinpoint Slide:

    • Pinpoint the staff behavior of interest for increase or decrease. Ensure that your definition

    follows all the requirements of a high-quality pinpoint (measurable, observable, passes the

    “dead person’s” test, not a non-behavior, etc.) Please review content in Module 3 for a

    refresher on appropriate pinpoints.

    4. PDC-HS Slides (x4):

    • Conduct a mock PDC-HS related to your scenario and briefly describe your findings for each

    section on separate slides. You should have a slide each for:

    o Training

    o Task Clarification and Prompting

    o Resources, Materials, & Processes

    o Performance Consequences, Effort, and Competition

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    5. Intervention Slide:

    • Select the intervention that you believe will have the greatest impact on the behavior of the

    supervisee/trainee member. Provide a list of resources needed to implement the

    intervention (including people, time, funding, etc.), and a task analysis of the steps you

    would take to put the intervention in place.

    6. Measuring Success Slide:

    • Describe what data you would collect to determine if the intervention was successful and

    how you would collect those data. For a refresher on measurement strategies, please

    review the content from Module 3.

    Whether the presentation is recorded or live, it is expected that the presenter will speak clearly, so that all

    words are audible. It is also expected that the presenter will be prepared and articulate the information on

    the slides in a smooth and controlled manner (i.e., deliver pertinent information without long pauses or

    repetition of filler words).

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    Rubric – 100 Points

    Criteria 5 Points 3 Points 0 Points

    Presentation:

    The speaker was

    audible, and the

    presentation was
    submitted on time.

    All criteria met.

    One Criterion was

    met.

    No criteria were

    met.

    Criteria 5 Points 3 Points 0 Points

    Title Slide:

    Presentation title
    and student name

    clearly indicated

    All criteria met.

    One Criterion was

    met.

    No criteria were

    met.

    Criteria 10 Points 5 Points 0 Points

    Scenario Slide:
    Included relevant
    contextual
    information,
    including the setting,
    relevant
    relationships
    between individuals
    in the
    scenario/situation,
    and environmental
    variables.

    All criteria met.

    At least (50%) of

    the criteria were

    met.

    Less than 50% of

    criteria were met.

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    Pinpoint Slide:

    High-quality

    pinpoint was

    provided (e.g.,
    measurable,

    observable, and
    reliable)

    All criteria met.

    At least 66% of

    criteria met.

    Less than 66%

    of criteria met.

    SUPERVISION CASE STUDY PROJECT

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    PDC-HS Slides (x4)

    Evidence of a

    completed PDC-HS
    describing each of

    the following areas
    on individual slides:

    1. Training

    2. Task Clarification

    and Prompting,

    3. Resources,
    Materials, and

    Processes

    4. Performance

    Consequences,

    Effort, and
    Competition

    All slides were

    present and

    supported.

    At least 50% of the

    slides were present

    and well supported

    or all slides were

    present but not well

    supported.

    Less than 50% of

    the slides were

    present or were

    poorly supported

    (i.e., no evidence

    PDC-HS was

    utilized)

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    Intervention Slide:

    A list of resources
    listed to implement
    the intervention
    (including people,
    time, funding, etc.),
    and a task analysis
    of intervention.

    All criteria met.

    Task analysis was

    present, but not

    comprehensive

    and/or resources

    were mentioned,

    but not adequate.

    Task analysis was

    not present or

    very weak and/or

    list of resources

    were not present.

    Criteria 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points

    Measuring success:

    A behavior analytic

    measurement and

    data collection
    procedure was

    described in a way
    it could be

    replicated.

    All criteria were

    met.

    At least 50% of

    criteria were met.

    Less than 50% of

    criteria were met.

    – Overview
    – Slide Deck Requirements:
    – Presentation Requirements
    – Rubric – 100 Points

  • [Solved] SS 2800 MOD 2 ASSN

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) info attached – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SS2800MOD2ASSNINFO2025.docx **## SS2800MOD2ASSNINFO2025.docx** **Overview:** In this assignment, you will look at a social issue that needs to be changed. Prepare a w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    info attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SS2800MOD2ASSNINFO2025.docx

    **## SS2800MOD2ASSNINFO2025.docx**

    **Overview:**

    In this assignment, you will look at a social issue that needs to be changed. Prepare a written response to the prompt below using a word processor. Please save your file in .doc or .docx format. Your response should be complete, and your final document should be at least one (1) page in length and should comply with APA writing requirements.

    _APA Resources can be found in the "Student Resources" button on our course home page, then click on Academic Support._

    **Instructions:**

    1. Consider something in the world you would like to change.

    2. Write a one-page paper that includes the following:

    · Identify a problem in society that you believe needs addressed.

    · Who does this problem affect?

    · What do you think is the cause of the problem? Is it caused by an individual? Society?

    · Do you think it can be changed? How?

    **## SS2800MOD2ASSNINFO2025.docx**

    **Overview:**

    In this assignment, you will look at a social issue that needs to be changed. Prepare a written response to the prompt below using a word processor. Please save your file in .doc or .docx format. Your response should be complete, and your final document should be at least one (1) page in length and should comply with APA writing requirements.

    _APA Resources can be found in the "Student Resources" button on our course home page, then click on Academic Support._

    **Instructions:**

    1. Consider something in the world you would like to change.

    2. Write a one-page paper that includes the following:

    · Identify a problem in society that you believe needs addressed.

    · Who does this problem affect?

    · What do you think is the cause of the problem? Is it caused by an individual? Society?

    · Do you think it can be changed? How?

  • [Solved] SQL3 Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SQL statements help – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## Lesson3Questions.docx – Screenshot2025-03-19213507.png – Screenshot2025-03-19213402.png **## Lesson3Questions.docx** You are required to complete exercises 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Chapter 3. For each exercise, you need to create SQL statements and r…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SQL statements help

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## Lesson3Questions.docx

    – Screenshot2025-03-19213507.png
    – Screenshot2025-03-19213402.png

    **## Lesson3Questions.docx**

    You are required to complete exercises 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Chapter 3. For each exercise, you need to create SQL statements and related CSV files. Here's what you need to do:

    · Exercise 8: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise8_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise8_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 9: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise9_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise9_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 10: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise10_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise10_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 11: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise11_MEID.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise11_ JAM2334209.csv .

    · Custom Query 1: Create a SELECT statement that uses WHERE. Save this SQL statement as CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom1_ JAM2334209.sql .  Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom1_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Custom Query 2:  Create a SELECT statement that uses ORDER BY and LIMIT.  Save this SQL statement as CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom2_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom2_ JAM2334209.csv.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    1. Place all SQL files(6) and CSV files(6) in a folder labeled "Lesson 3".

    2. Replace "MEID" in the file names with your actual MEID.

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213507.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213507-png)

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213402.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213402-png)

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213402.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213402-png)

    **## Lesson3Questions.docx**

    You are required to complete exercises 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Chapter 3. For each exercise, you need to create SQL statements and related CSV files. Here's what you need to do:

    · Exercise 8: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise8_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise8_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 9: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise9_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise9_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 10: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise10_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise10_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 11: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise11_MEID.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise11_ JAM2334209.csv .

    · Custom Query 1: Create a SELECT statement that uses WHERE. Save this SQL statement as CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom1_ JAM2334209.sql .  Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom1_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Custom Query 2:  Create a SELECT statement that uses ORDER BY and LIMIT.  Save this SQL statement as CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom2_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom2_ JAM2334209.csv.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    1. Place all SQL files(6) and CSV files(6) in a folder labeled "Lesson 3".

    2. Replace "MEID" in the file names with your actual MEID.

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213507.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213507-png)

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213402.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213402-png)

    **## Lesson3Questions.docx**

    You are required to complete exercises 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Chapter 3. For each exercise, you need to create SQL statements and related CSV files. Here's what you need to do:

    · Exercise 8: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise8_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise8_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 9: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise9_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise9_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 10: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise10_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise10_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Exercise 11: Write your SQL statement in a file named CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise11_MEID.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Exercise11_ JAM2334209.csv .

    · Custom Query 1: Create a SELECT statement that uses WHERE. Save this SQL statement as CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom1_ JAM2334209.sql .  Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom1_ JAM2334209.csv.

    · Custom Query 2:  Create a SELECT statement that uses ORDER BY and LIMIT.  Save this SQL statement as CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom2_ JAM2334209.sql. Run the script and export the results to CIS276DA_Lesson3Custom2_ JAM2334209.csv.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    1. Place all SQL files(6) and CSV files(6) in a folder labeled "Lesson 3".

    2. Replace "MEID" in the file names with your actual MEID.

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213507.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213507-png)

    **Screenshot2025-03-19213402.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-03-19213402-png)

  • [Solved] Ruth Ginsburg (Women’s Studies)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ruthbaderginsburg.docx **## ruthbaderginsburg.docx** Instructions (The story is online_ Watch the movie _On the Basis of Sex (2 hours)_ If you run out of time, watch the last 30 minutes of the movie (but it's an important film so I recommend watching all of it). You…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ruthbaderginsburg.docx

    **## ruthbaderginsburg.docx**

    Instructions (The story is online_

    Watch the movie
    _On the Basis of Sex (2 hours)_ If you run out of time, watch the last 30 minutes of the movie (but it's an important film so I recommend watching all of it). You can find where it's streaming on JustWatch.Links to an external site.
    **AS PART of your Reflective Analysis, please include your answers to the following questions.**

    1. Identify three barriers faced by RBG?  How did she respond to these barriers?  What tools did she use or not use?

    2. Was Ruth Bader Ginsberg an effective leader? Was she successful? Why or why not?

    3. What do you take away from this movie? How can you apply these takeaways to your own situations?

    Use concepts and examples in this week's readings to support your analysis. Reflect on what you've learned about yourself and your takeaways from the movie.

    Click the Next tab below to take you to further assignment instructions.

    Module 1: Practicing Reflective Analysis

    Instructions

    Each week students are expected to have read the course material and prepare a written reflection/reaction/annotated bibliography.

    **FIRST**: Reflect – write a 2-page reflection offering your insights regarding the course discussion from the weekly group discussion activities, course learning materials (movies, articles, videos, field notes, and Photographs). This should be properly cited and formatted according to APA, and show an attempt to grapple with the content offered.   (You are required to use material from the Module to support your thoughts.  At this point, your citations should be many.)

    **AND THEN:**  React to the materials from the module by responding to the following prompts:

    1. How do the concepts of impartiality and merit, as explored in the readings and film, challenge traditional notions of fairness in hiring and evaluation processes?

    2. What are the psychological and social implications of self-promotion for women in leadership roles? How do you experience "impression management" or the behavioral double bind in your workplace or other social situations?

    3. How do biases impact women's career advancement, and what strategies could organizations implement to mitigate these biases?

    4. What questions or areas of curiosity remain for you after completing this module?

    **FINALLY:**  Annotate your reading to demonstrate your understanding of the journal articles.
    **Choose, 3 articles from the module** and create a short annotated bibliography using APA format (example provided here).  Your annotations should include a summary of the article's major points, and demonstrate the source’s application to your paper.

    For the ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, please keep in mind that all text, including the write-up beneath the citation, must be indented so that the author's last name is the only text that is flush left.
    **THIS COUNTED TOWARD THE 2 PAGE REFLECTION.**

    SAMPLE APA ANNOTATION

    Ehrenreich, B. (2001).
    _Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America_. Henry Holt and Company.

    In this book of nonfiction based on the journalist's experiential research, Ehrenreich attempts to ascertain whether it is currently possible for an individual to live on a minimum wage in America. Taking jobs as a waitress, a maid in a cleaning service, and a Walmart sales employee, the author summarizes and reflects on her work, her relationships with fellow workers, and her financial struggles in each situation.

    An experienced journalist, Ehrenreich is aware of the limitations of her experiment and the ethical implications of her experiential research tactics and reflects on these issues in the text. The author is forthcoming about her methods and supplements her experiences with scholarly research on her places of employment, the economy, and the rising cost of living in America. Ehrenreich’s project is timely, descriptive, and well-researched.

    The annotation above both summarizes and assesses the book in the citation. The first paragraph provides a summary of the author's project in the book, covering the main points of the work. The second paragraph points out the project’s strengths and evaluates its methods and presentation. This particular annotation does not reflect the source’s potential importance or usefulness for this person’s research.

    For information on formatting APA citations, see our
    [APA Formatting and Style Guide (Links to an external site.)](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa6_style/apa_style_introduction.html).

    Use the template provided here and then upload your completed paper. This paper is worth 20  points.

    **## ruthbaderginsburg.docx**

    Instructions (The story is online_

    Watch the movie
    _On the Basis of Sex (2 hours)_ If you run out of time, watch the last 30 minutes of the movie (but it's an important film so I recommend watching all of it). You can find where it's streaming on JustWatch.Links to an external site.
    **AS PART of your Reflective Analysis, please include your answers to the following questions.**

    1. Identify three barriers faced by RBG?  How did she respond to these barriers?  What tools did she use or not use?

    2. Was Ruth Bader Ginsberg an effective leader? Was she successful? Why or why not?

    3. What do you take away from this movie? How can you apply these takeaways to your own situations?

    Use concepts and examples in this week's readings to support your analysis. Reflect on what you've learned about yourself and your takeaways from the movie.

    Click the Next tab below to take you to further assignment instructions.

    Module 1: Practicing Reflective Analysis

    Instructions

    Each week students are expected to have read the course material and prepare a written reflection/reaction/annotated bibliography.

    **FIRST**: Reflect – write a 2-page reflection offering your insights regarding the course discussion from the weekly group discussion activities, course learning materials (movies, articles, videos, field notes, and Photographs). This should be properly cited and formatted according to APA, and show an attempt to grapple with the content offered.   (You are required to use material from the Module to support your thoughts.  At this point, your citations should be many.)

    **AND THEN:**  React to the materials from the module by responding to the following prompts:

    1. How do the concepts of impartiality and merit, as explored in the readings and film, challenge traditional notions of fairness in hiring and evaluation processes?

    2. What are the psychological and social implications of self-promotion for women in leadership roles? How do you experience "impression management" or the behavioral double bind in your workplace or other social situations?

    3. How do biases impact women's career advancement, and what strategies could organizations implement to mitigate these biases?

    4. What questions or areas of curiosity remain for you after completing this module?

    **FINALLY:**  Annotate your reading to demonstrate your understanding of the journal articles.
    **Choose, 3 articles from the module** and create a short annotated bibliography using APA format (example provided here).  Your annotations should include a summary of the article's major points, and demonstrate the source’s application to your paper.

    For the ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, please keep in mind that all text, including the write-up beneath the citation, must be indented so that the author's last name is the only text that is flush left.
    **THIS COUNTED TOWARD THE 2 PAGE REFLECTION.**

    SAMPLE APA ANNOTATION

    Ehrenreich, B. (2001).
    _Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America_. Henry Holt and Company.

    In this book of nonfiction based on the journalist's experiential research, Ehrenreich attempts to ascertain whether it is currently possible for an individual to live on a minimum wage in America. Taking jobs as a waitress, a maid in a cleaning service, and a Walmart sales employee, the author summarizes and reflects on her work, her relationships with fellow workers, and her financial struggles in each situation.

    An experienced journalist, Ehrenreich is aware of the limitations of her experiment and the ethical implications of her experiential research tactics and reflects on these issues in the text. The author is forthcoming about her methods and supplements her experiences with scholarly research on her places of employment, the economy, and the rising cost of living in America. Ehrenreich’s project is timely, descriptive, and well-researched.

    The annotation above both summarizes and assesses the book in the citation. The first paragraph provides a summary of the author's project in the book, covering the main points of the work. The second paragraph points out the project’s strengths and evaluates its methods and presentation. This particular annotation does not reflect the source’s potential importance or usefulness for this person’s research.

    For information on formatting APA citations, see our
    [APA Formatting and Style Guide (Links to an external site.)](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa6_style/apa_style_introduction.html).

    Use the template provided here and then upload your completed paper. This paper is worth 20  points.

  • [Solved] RewardBenefitsCase

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Module3casetempMGT511.docx **## Module3casetempMGT511.docx** Today’s HR professionals are expected to measure the success or failure of HR practices based on the achievement of organizational outcomes. Brand identity, bottom-line profitability, employee job satisfact…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Module3casetempMGT511.docx

    **## Module3casetempMGT511.docx**

    Today’s HR professionals are expected to measure the success or failure of HR practices based on the achievement of organizational outcomes. Brand identity, bottom-line profitability, employee job satisfaction, and increased management focus are all outcomes that can be achieved in part through an organization’s total rewards program.

    This case examines a fictitious M. K. Makey organization and how it aligns its total rewards programs with its organizational goals and values.

    Read the
    _The Makey Case_.

    **Case Assignment**

    You have been asked to write an
    **opinion piece** for a local newspaper in which you address the following:

    1.
    **Analyze the practice of companies offering their own products to enhance the total compensation of its employees.**

    2.
    **Is this a common practice in U.S. organizations? Give real-life examples (employers by name). In your educated opinion, do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?**

    3.
    **Make recommendations regarding an expansion of the benefits programs offered at Makey’s. Justify your recommendations with outside sources.**

    Use at least
    **3 library sources &/or module sources** to help strengthen and validate your discussion. Also, utilize actual employer examples (stating employers by name) from your readings/research.

    Submit your paper by the module due date. Paper length:
    **3-4 pages** (not counting the cover and reference pages).

    **Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the Case rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood, and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality (library?) sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?

    ·
    **Timeliness:** Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

    **## Module3casetempMGT511.docx**

    Today’s HR professionals are expected to measure the success or failure of HR practices based on the achievement of organizational outcomes. Brand identity, bottom-line profitability, employee job satisfaction, and increased management focus are all outcomes that can be achieved in part through an organization’s total rewards program.

    This case examines a fictitious M. K. Makey organization and how it aligns its total rewards programs with its organizational goals and values.

    Read the
    _The Makey Case_.

    **Case Assignment**

    You have been asked to write an
    **opinion piece** for a local newspaper in which you address the following:

    1.
    **Analyze the practice of companies offering their own products to enhance the total compensation of its employees.**

    2.
    **Is this a common practice in U.S. organizations? Give real-life examples (employers by name). In your educated opinion, do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?**

    3.
    **Make recommendations regarding an expansion of the benefits programs offered at Makey’s. Justify your recommendations with outside sources.**

    Use at least
    **3 library sources &/or module sources** to help strengthen and validate your discussion. Also, utilize actual employer examples (stating employers by name) from your readings/research.

    Submit your paper by the module due date. Paper length:
    **3-4 pages** (not counting the cover and reference pages).

    **Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the Case rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood, and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality (library?) sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?

    ·
    **Timeliness:** Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

  • [Solved] RESPONSE WEEK ONE FOR TRANSITION TO NP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    RESPON BACK TO THIS POST: you should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. **Barriers to Advanced Practice Nursing** There are many barriers that slow th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    RESPON BACK TO THIS POST: you should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.

    All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    **Barriers to Advanced Practice Nursing**

    There are many barriers that slow the progression of advanced practice nursing in healthcare. In this discussion, I will focus on the affects of the financial burden of affording higher education, restrictions on the scope of practice, and role conflict within interprofessional teams. It will address the impact that these barriers have on the growth of advanced practice nursing, as well as strategies that can be used to help advanced practice nurses (APRNs) navigate and overcome them.

    **Financial Burden of Affording Higher Education**

    While programs like The Affordable Healthcare Act’s Graduate Nurse Education Demonstration aim to offset the costs of clinical training for APRNs, many candidates still face difficulty financing their advanced degrees (Porat-Dahlerbruch et al., 2022). This slows the progress of advanced practice nursing by limiting access from nurses who are financially disadvantaged due to income, number of dependents, or established debt. Possible solutions to overcoming the lack of financial support for education include considering working full-time while completing the advanced degree, seeking scholarships and grants from honor societies and other organizations, applying for financial aid through federal student aid, and exploring military benefits (Khawly & Blore, 2025).

    **Restrictions on the Scope of Practice**

    The roles, responsibilities and autonomy for APRNs vary from state to state.  While 27 US states and territories allow full practice authority, others only allow reduced or restricted practice regulations (Boehning & Punsalan, 2023). This factor causes healthcare disparities within our nation by inhibiting access to high-quality, affordable, and preventative healthcare in many underserved areas (Boehning & Punsalan, 2023). This barrier can be overcome by advocating for state and federal-level policy changes allowing full practice authority for APRNs across the board.

    **Role Conflict within Interprofessional Teams**

    APRNs are trained to provide care by utilizing evidence-based practice and standardizing high-quality and affordable patient care for the American public (Boehning & Punsalan, 2023). The persistent misunderstanding of the APRN role has limited effective collaboration within the interprofessional team establishing role conflict. One distinguishing characteristic of APRNs is their proactivity in patient care. This feature is displayed within the advanced nursing practice via comprehensive patient education and lifestyle counseling, holistic patient care, and disease prevention (NPHub, 2024a). Establishing an advanced practice nursing leadership structure within healthcare organizations could help overcome this barrier within the interprofessional team by evaluating, maintaining, and promoting the APRN role. (Henderson et al., 2024).

    **Conclusion**

               In conclusion, financial constraints, limitations on practice authority, and interprofessional role conflict hinder the progression and advancement of advanced practice nursing. Addressing these inhibitions would require policy reforms, financial support programs, and enhanced collaboration within the interprofessional network. APRNs can continue to evolve and improve patient outcomes with ongoing advocacy and systemic change.

    – 2 years ago