Executive Solution Overview
– 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## 640Module3Reflection.docx **## 640Module3Reflection.docx** **Module 3 Reflection** **Please use only this resources :** **Textbooks & Course Materials** **This text is mandatory and can be purchased or rented through the textbook links in Canvas.** **● Chappuis, J., …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## 640Module3Reflection.docx
**## 640Module3Reflection.docx**
**Module 3 Reflection**
**Please use only this resources :**
**Textbooks & Course Materials**
**This text is mandatory and can be purchased or rented through the textbook links in Canvas.**
**● Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2020). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it**
**right – doing it well (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. ISBN-9780134899114**
**Optional-to-purchase texts used throughout the course. Chapters will be provided in the modules.**
**● Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.).**
**Pearson. ISBN 978-0134027296**
**● Cohen, L. G and Spenciner, L. J. (2015) – Assessment of children and youth with special**
**needs (4th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. ISBN: 978-0133574753**
**● Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Witmer, S. (2017). Assessment in special and inclusive**
**education (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1305887329**
**After choosing and analyzing the lesson plan/unit that you have chosen with the** [**Tool for Analyzing Curriculum**](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191263?wrap=1) [**Download Tool for Analyzing Curriculum**](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191263/download?download_frd=1) **, reflect on the findings and consider the needs of your learners.**
· What did you learn about your lesson plan/unit?
· What ideas do you have for assessment and how do you know if the activities are aligned to your standards?
· How can using BOTH UbD and UDL/HLP
[Download UbD and UDL/HLP](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191462/download?download_frd=1) frameworks help us to instructionally orient when planning your assessment and inform your lesson delivery?
· Why is this important for your learners?
· How can the
[Danielson Framework](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191613?wrap=1) [Download Danielson Framework](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191613/download?download_frd=1) guide our understanding of planning assessment?
**Reflective Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Reflective Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Entry Quality | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **8 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 3 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 300-500 words long. | **6 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 2 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 250-300 words long. | **5.25 pts**<br>**Novice**<br>1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 1 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 150-250 words long. | | 8 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **8 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>Candidate makes substantive connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner. | **6 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Candidate makes some connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner. | **5.25 pts**<br>**Novice**<br>Candidate makes little or no connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner. | | 8 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style and Composition | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **8 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>Assignment contains 2 or fewer errors. | **6 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Assignment contains 3 – 5 errors. | **5.25 pts**<br>**Novice**<br>Assignment contains 6 or more errors. | | 8 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness | | | |
| — | — |
| **4 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>Journals are submit on time each Module. | **2 pts**<br>**Novice** | | 4 pts |
| Total Points: 28 |
[Previous](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/modules/items/4623384)
[Next](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/modules/items/4623410)
**## 640Module3Reflection.docx**
**Module 3 Reflection**
**Please use only this resources :**
**Textbooks & Course Materials**
**This text is mandatory and can be purchased or rented through the textbook links in Canvas.**
**● Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2020). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it**
**right – doing it well (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. ISBN-9780134899114**
**Optional-to-purchase texts used throughout the course. Chapters will be provided in the modules.**
**● Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.).**
**Pearson. ISBN 978-0134027296**
**● Cohen, L. G and Spenciner, L. J. (2015) – Assessment of children and youth with special**
**needs (4th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. ISBN: 978-0133574753**
**● Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Witmer, S. (2017). Assessment in special and inclusive**
**education (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1305887329**
**After choosing and analyzing the lesson plan/unit that you have chosen with the** [**Tool for Analyzing Curriculum**](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191263?wrap=1) [**Download Tool for Analyzing Curriculum**](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191263/download?download_frd=1) **, reflect on the findings and consider the needs of your learners.**
· What did you learn about your lesson plan/unit?
· What ideas do you have for assessment and how do you know if the activities are aligned to your standards?
· How can using BOTH UbD and UDL/HLP
[Download UbD and UDL/HLP](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191462/download?download_frd=1) frameworks help us to instructionally orient when planning your assessment and inform your lesson delivery?
· Why is this important for your learners?
· How can the
[Danielson Framework](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191613?wrap=1) [Download Danielson Framework](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/files/11191613/download?download_frd=1) guide our understanding of planning assessment?
**Reflective Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Reflective Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Entry Quality | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **8 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 3 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 300-500 words long. | **6 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 2 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 250-300 words long. | **5.25 pts**<br>**Novice**<br>1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 1 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 150-250 words long. | | 8 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **8 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>Candidate makes substantive connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner. | **6 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Candidate makes some connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner. | **5.25 pts**<br>**Novice**<br>Candidate makes little or no connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner. | | 8 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style and Composition | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **8 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>Assignment contains 2 or fewer errors. | **6 pts**<br>**Proficient**<br>Assignment contains 3 – 5 errors. | **5.25 pts**<br>**Novice**<br>Assignment contains 6 or more errors. | | 8 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness | | | |
| — | — |
| **4 pts**<br>**Advanced**<br>Journals are submit on time each Module. | **2 pts**<br>**Novice** | | 4 pts |
| Total Points: 28 |
[Previous](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/modules/items/4623384)
[Next](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/137899/modules/items/4623410)