Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment Instructions attached

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module3Probabilityintrucctions.docx **## Module3Probabilityintrucctions.docx** **Module 3:** _Probability_ With the data presented here and in your readings in this module : · Express in probability terms the probability of each variable (age, height, weight, & BMI) · In the following graphs, w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module3Probabilityintrucctions.docx

    **## Module3Probabilityintrucctions.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Probability_

    With the data presented here and in your readings in this module :

    · Express in probability terms the probability of each variable (age, height, weight, & BMI)

    · In the following graphs, with the additional data, mark the possible value of the mean in the graph of age, height, weight, BMI

    | | | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Descriptive Statistics** |
    | | **AGE** | **HEIGHT** | **WEIGHT** | **BMI** |
    | Valid | | 69 | | 69 | | 69 | | 69 | |
    | Missing | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
    | Mean | | 45.928 | | 1.689 | | 78.837 | | 27.552 | |
    | Std. Deviation | | 9.753 | | 0.068 | | 14.984 | | 4.602 | |
    | Minimum | | 27.000 | | 1.570 | | 45.900 | | 17.070 | |
    | Maximum | | 71.000 | | 1.930 | | 144.000 | | 45.450 | |

    Statology.org. (2018).
    _Z table._ [https://www.statology.org/z-table/Links to an external site.](https://www.statology.org/z-table/)

    Statology.org. (2021). How to rind probability given a mean and standard deviation.
    [https://www.statology.org/find-probability-given-mean-and-standard-deviation/](https://www.statology.org/find-probability-given-mean-and-standard-deviation/)

    ·
    **Distribution plots**

    ·
    **Distribution plots**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    ![A graph of weight AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.

    · Contribute a minimum of 2 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ## image4.png

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## Module3Probabilityintrucctions.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Probability_

    With the data presented here and in your readings in this module :

    · Express in probability terms the probability of each variable (age, height, weight, & BMI)

    · In the following graphs, with the additional data, mark the possible value of the mean in the graph of age, height, weight, BMI

    | | | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Descriptive Statistics** |
    | | **AGE** | **HEIGHT** | **WEIGHT** | **BMI** |
    | Valid | | 69 | | 69 | | 69 | | 69 | |
    | Missing | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
    | Mean | | 45.928 | | 1.689 | | 78.837 | | 27.552 | |
    | Std. Deviation | | 9.753 | | 0.068 | | 14.984 | | 4.602 | |
    | Minimum | | 27.000 | | 1.570 | | 45.900 | | 17.070 | |
    | Maximum | | 71.000 | | 1.930 | | 144.000 | | 45.450 | |

    Statology.org. (2018).
    _Z table._ [https://www.statology.org/z-table/Links to an external site.](https://www.statology.org/z-table/)

    Statology.org. (2021). How to rind probability given a mean and standard deviation.
    [https://www.statology.org/find-probability-given-mean-and-standard-deviation/](https://www.statology.org/find-probability-given-mean-and-standard-deviation/)

    ·
    **Distribution plots**

    ·
    **Distribution plots**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    ![A graph of weight AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-instructions-attached)

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.

    · Contribute a minimum of 2 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/43007/assignments/846617)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    ## image4.png

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

  • [Solved] English 102

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I'm working on a five-paragraph character analysis for either Phoenix Jackson from Eudora Welty’s _A Worn Path_ or Madame Loisel from Guy de Maupassant’s _The Diamond Necklace_. The idea is to focus on one character and highlight four traits they show throughout the story—one trait per body paragrap…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I'm working on a five-paragraph character analysis for either Phoenix Jackson from Eudora Welty’s _A Worn Path_ or Madame Loisel from Guy de Maupassant’s _The Diamond Necklace_. The idea is to focus on one character and highlight four traits they show throughout the story—one trait per body paragraph. For each trait, back it up with specific moments from the story that show the character acting that way.
    It’s not just a summary of the plot—use events from the story to prove the character has those traits. And I need to include quotes from the text with proper citations, and a works cited page.

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment Instructions attached

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Module3Chart.docx **## Module3Chart.docx** **Module 3:** _Chart_ From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency. | | | | | — | — | — | | AGE | HIGH | WEIGHT | | 53 | 1.75 | 140…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Module3Chart.docx

    **## Module3Chart.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Chart_

    From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | AGE | HIGH | WEIGHT |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 140 |
    | 56 | 1.60 | 70 |
    | 62 | 1.84 | 86 |
    | 36 | 1.65 | 80 |
    | 39 | 1.69 | 65 |
    | 26 | 1.64 | 64 |
    | 58 | 1.70 | 78.5 |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 91 |
    | 34 | 1.66 | 82 |
    | 44 | 1.72 | 114 |
    | 49 | 1.70 | 98 |
    | 33 | 1.77 | 106 |
    | 37 | 1.63 | 81 |
    | 40 | 1.60 | 60 |

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.

    · Contribute a minimum of (1) pages. It should include at least (2) academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    ·
    **Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    **## Module3Chart.docx**

    **Module 3:** _Chart_

    From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | AGE | HIGH | WEIGHT |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 140 |
    | 56 | 1.60 | 70 |
    | 62 | 1.84 | 86 |
    | 36 | 1.65 | 80 |
    | 39 | 1.69 | 65 |
    | 26 | 1.64 | 64 |
    | 58 | 1.70 | 78.5 |
    | 53 | 1.75 | 91 |
    | 34 | 1.66 | 82 |
    | 44 | 1.72 | 114 |
    | 49 | 1.70 | 98 |
    | 33 | 1.77 | 106 |
    | 37 | 1.63 | 81 |
    | 40 | 1.60 | 60 |

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.

    · Contribute a minimum of (1) pages. It should include at least (2) academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    ·
    **Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

  • [Solved] infographi topic deb

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## infographicdebate.docx **## infographicdebate.docx** **Step 1**: Select **_ONE_** interesting, debatable topic regarding infancy development that you would like to learn more about. Do some background research to provide more insight into that topic. You may reference information from national …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## infographicdebate.docx

    **## infographicdebate.docx**

    **Step 1**: Select
    **_ONE_** interesting, debatable topic regarding infancy development that you would like to learn more about. Do some background research to provide more insight into that topic. You may reference information from national organizations that focus on child development such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, UNICEF, etc.
    **_Below are some topics that have been debated in recent times, you may choose_**
    **_ONE of the following topics of your interest to discuss:_**

    · Breastfeeding

    · Vaccinations

    · Circumcision

    · Gender-Neutral Parenting

    · Co-sleeping

    **Step 2:** Select some interesting facts from your research. Your objective is to
    **_create an interesting visual_** **_or infographic_** so that an outside observer can quickly learn the
    **_pros and cons_** of the topic you chose.

    **Step 3:** Your infographic must include at least
    **two images** (pictures, charts, and graphs all count as images) and
    **informational text**. Present both sides of the “debate” on your infographic (for example, the pros and cons of circumcision).

    **_Please do not feel overwhelmed by creating an infographic. Think of it as making a “poster or flyer" about the topic. You may design the infographic on any platform you desire, such as Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Photoshop, or Canva._**

    **_Note:_** _References and citations (in-text) are required to be in American Psychological Association (APA) format._
    _**Include your references at the bottom of the graphic.**_

    **_PLEASE DO NOT COPY AND PASTE INFORMATION FROM SOURCES, THAT IS PLAGIARISM. PARAPHRASE OR SUMMARIZE INFORMATION. IF USING TURNITIN TO CHECK PLAGIARISM, BE SURE THE PERCENTAGE IS UNDER 20%._**

    **Hot Topic Infographic Grading Rubric:**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Proficient** | **Developing** | **Not Evident** | **Points** |
    | Creates a visual infographic poster on a relevant topic | Visual is attractive and interesting. | Visual is somewhat attractive and interesting. | Visual is not attractive or interesting. | __/10 |
    | Includes at least two images and text about the topic | Visual includes at least two visuals as well as some text | Visual partially includes visuals and text | Visual does not include at least two visuals as well as some text | __/10 |
    | Presents accurate and informative facts in infographic. | Includes some accurate and informative facts about the topic. | Partially includes accurate and informative facts about the topic | Does not include accurate and informative facts about the topic | __/10 |
    | Includes correct APA references | Provides APA references either on the image or a separate reference page | Provides partial or incorrect APA references either on the image or a separate reference page | Does not provide APA references | __/5 |
    | **Total:** | __/35 |
    | |

    **## infographicdebate.docx**

    **Step 1**: Select
    **_ONE_** interesting, debatable topic regarding infancy development that you would like to learn more about. Do some background research to provide more insight into that topic. You may reference information from national organizations that focus on child development such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, UNICEF, etc.
    **_Below are some topics that have been debated in recent times, you may choose_**
    **_ONE of the following topics of your interest to discuss:_**

    · Breastfeeding

    · Vaccinations

    · Circumcision

    · Gender-Neutral Parenting

    · Co-sleeping

    **Step 2:** Select some interesting facts from your research. Your objective is to
    **_create an interesting visual_** **_or infographic_** so that an outside observer can quickly learn the
    **_pros and cons_** of the topic you chose.

    **Step 3:** Your infographic must include at least
    **two images** (pictures, charts, and graphs all count as images) and
    **informational text**. Present both sides of the “debate” on your infographic (for example, the pros and cons of circumcision).

    **_Please do not feel overwhelmed by creating an infographic. Think of it as making a “poster or flyer" about the topic. You may design the infographic on any platform you desire, such as Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Photoshop, or Canva._**

    **_Note:_** _References and citations (in-text) are required to be in American Psychological Association (APA) format._
    _**Include your references at the bottom of the graphic.**_

    **_PLEASE DO NOT COPY AND PASTE INFORMATION FROM SOURCES, THAT IS PLAGIARISM. PARAPHRASE OR SUMMARIZE INFORMATION. IF USING TURNITIN TO CHECK PLAGIARISM, BE SURE THE PERCENTAGE IS UNDER 20%._**

    **Hot Topic Infographic Grading Rubric:**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Proficient** | **Developing** | **Not Evident** | **Points** |
    | Creates a visual infographic poster on a relevant topic | Visual is attractive and interesting. | Visual is somewhat attractive and interesting. | Visual is not attractive or interesting. | __/10 |
    | Includes at least two images and text about the topic | Visual includes at least two visuals as well as some text | Visual partially includes visuals and text | Visual does not include at least two visuals as well as some text | __/10 |
    | Presents accurate and informative facts in infographic. | Includes some accurate and informative facts about the topic. | Partially includes accurate and informative facts about the topic | Does not include accurate and informative facts about the topic | __/10 |
    | Includes correct APA references | Provides APA references either on the image or a separate reference page | Provides partial or incorrect APA references either on the image or a separate reference page | Does not provide APA references | __/5 |
    | **Total:** | __/35 |
    | |

  • [Solved] follow the instructions attached

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Respond to this scenario: Your friend has “met” someone new online. Now your friend thinks that he/she/they has developed a close relationship with this new friend, and their communication has been personal and self-disclosing regarding lifestyles and experiences. Your friend wants to meet this inte…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Respond to this scenario: Your friend has “met” someone new online. Now your friend thinks that he/she/they has developed a close relationship with this new friend, and their communication has been personal and self-disclosing regarding lifestyles and experiences. Your friend wants to meet this internet friend and is seeking your support. What questions do you have for your friend? (2.25 points).  What advice would you give him/her/them, based on the research covered in the text? (3 points).  How do you think the communication in-person will differ from the communication they had online? (2.25 points).  (1.5 points will be given for proper formatting and academic writing, including page length and proper grammar).
    ## Rubric
    **P173S SA Chapter 5** P173S SA Chapter 5CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat questions do you have for your friend?2.25 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdvice (based on research in text)3 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHow will communicatioin difffer in-person vs. online?2.25 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper formatting & academic writing (including page length & proper grammar)1.5 pts
    Total Points: 9 [Previous](https://canvas.eee.uci.edu/courses/75916/modules/items/3377141) [Next](https://canvas.eee.uci.edu/courses/75916/modules/items/3377143)

  • [Solved] Discussion Thread: Research Design Writing Exercise and Peer Feedback

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Using the **Jerry Falwell Library,** complete a library search and find one quantitative and one qualitative article related to your research interest. In your discussion, write one quantitative and one qualitative abstract of two research studies found in your online search. For this exercise, plea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Using the **Jerry Falwell Library,** complete a library search and find one quantitative and one qualitative article related to your research interest. In your discussion, write one quantitative and one qualitative abstract of two research studies found in your online search. For this exercise, please select a research article rather than a non-empirical study. Use the guidelines provided in the Creswell & Creswell text for the elements to include in your literature abstracts.

  • [Solved] Risk Management and Role of Managed Care

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## RiskManagementandtheRoleofManagedCare.docx **## RiskManagementandtheRoleofManagedCare.docx** The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the role of managed care organizations within health care and risk management programs. Reflect on and evaluate the role that the managed care organization (…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## RiskManagementandtheRoleofManagedCare.docx

    **## RiskManagementandtheRoleofManagedCare.docx**

    The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the role of managed care organizations within health care and risk management programs.

    Reflect on and evaluate the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today's health care environment by developing a 750-1,000-word response that addresses the following:

    · Explain what a health care organization's administrative role is in executing risk management policies and ensuring compliance with managed care organization (MCO) standards.

    · Explain what value the regulatory statutes of a typical MCO provide to a health care organization and include strategies pertaining to policies such as conflict resolution and risk management that affect patients and families as well as employees and employers.

    · Explain what MCO responsibilities relevant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws.

    · Identify strategies that can be implemented for developing a culture of reporting and transparency.

    In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with at least three credible health-related resources.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **## RiskManagementandtheRoleofManagedCare.docx**

    The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the role of managed care organizations within health care and risk management programs.

    Reflect on and evaluate the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today's health care environment by developing a 750-1,000-word response that addresses the following:

    · Explain what a health care organization's administrative role is in executing risk management policies and ensuring compliance with managed care organization (MCO) standards.

    · Explain what value the regulatory statutes of a typical MCO provide to a health care organization and include strategies pertaining to policies such as conflict resolution and risk management that affect patients and families as well as employees and employers.

    · Explain what MCO responsibilities relevant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws.

    · Identify strategies that can be implemented for developing a culture of reporting and transparency.

    In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with at least three credible health-related resources.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

  • [Solved] HCAD D7W7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Healthcare organizations have traditionally encountered great difficulty in accurately capturing the costs of the services and goods that they provide. Traditional costing methods (i.e., direct, step-down, etc.) have proven marginally useful despite decades of use. In general, this has caused proble…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Healthcare organizations have traditionally encountered great difficulty in accurately capturing the costs of the services and goods that they provide. Traditional costing methods (i.e., direct, step-down, etc.) have proven marginally useful despite decades of use. In general, this has caused problems within healthcare organizations as it obscures the true cost of care and overall profitability. Cost overruns and extraordinary spending by healthcare organizations harm the economic sustainability of the healthcare organization.
    \
    HCADDISCUSSION7.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hcaddiscussion7-docx "HCADDISCUSSION7.docx")

  • [Solved] Your initial submission

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Kindly reply to the following discussion subject. Your initial submission must be at least 150 words long. Next, provide at least two insightful comments on each of your classmates' postings. If you were the owner of a company trying to expand, would you prefer to raise money through debt, equity, o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Kindly reply to the following discussion subject. Your initial submission must be at least 150 words long. Next, provide at least two insightful comments on each of your classmates' postings.  If you were the owner of a company trying to expand, would you prefer to raise money through debt, equity, or a combination of the two?    <a href="https://gorillatag.io/">gorilla tag</a>

  • [Solved] Nursing HOMEWORK3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## JWEEK11_PRAC6675ournalEntry.docx **## JWEEK11_PRAC6675ournalEntry.docx** Journal Entry Prepare · Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## JWEEK11_PRAC6675ournalEntry.docx

    **## JWEEK11_PRAC6675ournalEntry.docx**

    Journal Entry

    Prepare

    · Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty.

    · Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek; consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

    **In 450–500 words, address the following:**

    **Learning From Experiences**

    · Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

    · Reflect on the 3 most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?

    · What did you learn from this experience?

    · What resources were available?

    · What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?

    · What would you do differently?

    · How are you managing patient flow and volume?  How can you apply your growing skillset to be a social change agent within your community?

    **Communicating and Feedback**

    · Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.

    · Answer these questions: How am I doing? What is missing?

    · Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

    By Day 7

    **## JWEEK11_PRAC6675ournalEntry.docx**

    Journal Entry

    Prepare

    · Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty.

    · Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek; consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

    **In 450–500 words, address the following:**

    **Learning From Experiences**

    · Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

    · Reflect on the 3 most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?

    · What did you learn from this experience?

    · What resources were available?

    · What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?

    · What would you do differently?

    · How are you managing patient flow and volume?  How can you apply your growing skillset to be a social change agent within your community?

    **Communicating and Feedback**

    · Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.

    · Answer these questions: How am I doing? What is missing?

    · Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

    By Day 7