Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] DB help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering DB help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] DIS 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Attached – ## 1.docx – ## rubric.docx **## 1.docx** DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE. [Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and respons…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Attached

    – ## 1.docx

    – ## rubric.docx

    **## 1.docx**

    DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE.

    [Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position, and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion will focus on student success and the practices that promote success such as UDL. These practices can be reflective of what classrooms , workplace and home settings. Some of the questions: How do we define success? How do we create an environment that will be conducive for success? What practices encourage students and promote success and discourage students from succeeding? Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts (it can be two posts on the same subject or two independent posts)  and 2 replies (it can be 2 replies to the same person or to two different people).  Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    **## 1.docx**

    DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE.

    [Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position, and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion will focus on student success and the practices that promote success such as UDL. These practices can be reflective of what classrooms , workplace and home settings. Some of the questions: How do we define success? How do we create an environment that will be conducive for success? What practices encourage students and promote success and discourage students from succeeding? Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts (it can be two posts on the same subject or two independent posts)  and 2 replies (it can be 2 replies to the same person or to two different people).  Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    **## 1.docx**

    DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE.

    [Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position, and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion will focus on student success and the practices that promote success such as UDL. These practices can be reflective of what classrooms , workplace and home settings. Some of the questions: How do we define success? How do we create an environment that will be conducive for success? What practices encourage students and promote success and discourage students from succeeding? Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts (it can be two posts on the same subject or two independent posts)  and 2 replies (it can be 2 replies to the same person or to two different people).  Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] ASU

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ PleasevisittheMontgomeryInterpretiveCenterlocatedneartheASU.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleasevisitthemontgomeryinterpretivecenterlocatedneartheasu-png-10419605 "PleasevisittheMontgomeryInterpretiveCenterlocatedneartheASU.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    PleasevisittheMontgomeryInterpretiveCenterlocatedneartheASU.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pleasevisitthemontgomeryinterpretivecenterlocatedneartheasu-png-10419605 "PleasevisittheMontgomeryInterpretiveCenterlocatedneartheASU.png")

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Identify a proposed state and federal policy that aligns with your advocacy priorities for your vulnerable population. Clearly describe and provide evidence to support this policy. If the policy needs to change, describe and provide evidence to support the proposed change.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Identify a proposed state and federal policy that aligns with your advocacy priorities for your vulnerable population. Clearly describe and provide evidence to support this policy. If the policy needs to change, describe and provide evidence to support the proposed change.

  • [Solved] History

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## antebellumsouth.docx **## antebellumsouth.docx** This is for a history class. I need a 3-4 paper on _education in the antebellum south_. Use any references that you find is good for the paper. **## antebellumsouth.docx** This is for a history class. I need a 3-4 paper on _education in the anteb…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## antebellumsouth.docx

    **## antebellumsouth.docx**

    This is for a history class. I need a 3-4 paper on
    _education in the antebellum south_. Use any references that you find is good for the paper.

    **## antebellumsouth.docx**

    This is for a history class. I need a 3-4 paper on
    _education in the antebellum south_. Use any references that you find is good for the paper.

  • [Solved] Public debate

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    umbrella topic should be about sex work please – ## EnteringPublicDebatePrompt_2024.docx – EnglishCompositionIISection04Fall2025CO-1062025-822PM.zip **## EnteringPublicDebatePrompt_2024.docx** **ENGL 1102: Entering Public Debate (Final Project)** Thus far this semester we have surveyed the work of…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    umbrella topic should be about sex work please

    – ## EnteringPublicDebatePrompt_2024.docx

    – EnglishCompositionIISection04Fall2025CO-1062025-822PM.zip

    **## EnteringPublicDebatePrompt_2024.docx**

    **ENGL 1102: Entering Public Debate (Final Project)**

    Thus far this semester we have surveyed the work of published authors and filmmakers who have examined workplace and labor-related issues. For our final project, you will be developing an independent research project that takes up a current labor-related issue on a national or local scale. The purpose of your argument (e.g. to assert, to prevail, to inquire, or to negotiate differences) is entirely up to you, as is your audience and form.

    Your project will be made up of four components: an annotated bibliography, a prospectus, a multi-modal presentation, and an argumentative research essay of 2,500-3750 words.

    **Grade Distribution:**

    **Annotated Bibliography:** 15%

    **Prospectus:** 10%

    **PechaKucha Presentation:** 5%

    **Entering Pubic Debate Paper:** 25%

    **Annotated Bibliography:** An annotated bibliography is a works cited page with a brief summary and analysis of each work. As an early step in the research process, it provides the author with an inventory of information that can be referred to quickly while drafting. For this paper, you will be providing bibliographic citations and short (200-word minimum) analytical summaries of at least ten sources, including no fewer than
    three peer-reviewed academic sources. Your analytical summaries should incorporate concrete detail and quotation. Consider using the writing strategies we discussed in class: the believing game, rhetorical precis, etc.

    **Prospectus:** A prospectus is a short proposal for your research. It includes a provisional thesis, a description of background or context explaining the timeliness of your research, and a plan for how you will develop your writing in terms of intended genre and audience. Approximately 500-600 words.

    ## **Argumentative Research Essay:** Examining a "problem of consequence" connected to labor on a national or local scale. 2500-3750 words (8-12 pages) with bibliography in MLA format containing at least 5 citations.

    **PechaKucha Presentation:** Your
    final presentation will recast the argument of your research project as a PechaKucha slideshow, using 20 slides for 20 seconds each (6:40 total). 80% of your presentation grade will be based on your own presentation. The remaining 20% will be based on your attendance and participation for your classmates' presentations.

    **"Umbrella Topics":** An umbrella topic is a "big idea" that contains within it many subtopics. For this assignment, you will want to narrow your focus as much as possible, looking for a "problem of consequence" that 1) affects a large number of people; 2) requires a complex solution; and 3) is a site of ongoing disagreement between stakeholders. Potential umbrella topics for this paper include subjects such as:

    · Income Inequality (Minimum Wage, Living Wage, Universal Basic Income, etc.)

    · The Gig Economy

    · Wage Theft

    · Child Labor Laws (Undocumented workers in meatpacking, roofing, etc.)

    · Work from Home

    · Non-Compete Clauses, Non-Disclosure Agreements

    · Salary and Treatment of Campus Staff

    · Higher Education (Return on Investment)

    · On-site Childcare, Support for Breastfeeding Mothers

    · Individual and Collective Bargaining ("Right to Work" legislation, labor unions, etc.)

    · Race, Gender, Religion, Sexual Orientation, or Generational Differences in the Workplace

    · Career-Related Issues Connected to Your Major (Future Prospects, Educational Challenges, etc.)

    · Automation, Artificial Intelligence

    · Sex Work

    · The Effect of Work on Academic Performance

    **EnglishCompositionIISection04Fall2025CO-1062025-822PM.zip**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/englishcompositioniisection04fall2025co-1062025-822pm-zip)

    **EnglishCompositionIISection04Fall2025CO-1062025-822PM.zip**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/englishcompositioniisection04fall2025co-1062025-822pm-zip)

    **## EnteringPublicDebatePrompt_2024.docx**

    **ENGL 1102: Entering Public Debate (Final Project)**

    Thus far this semester we have surveyed the work of published authors and filmmakers who have examined workplace and labor-related issues. For our final project, you will be developing an independent research project that takes up a current labor-related issue on a national or local scale. The purpose of your argument (e.g. to assert, to prevail, to inquire, or to negotiate differences) is entirely up to you, as is your audience and form.

    Your project will be made up of four components: an annotated bibliography, a prospectus, a multi-modal presentation, and an argumentative research essay of 2,500-3750 words.

    **Grade Distribution:**

    **Annotated Bibliography:** 15%

    **Prospectus:** 10%

    **PechaKucha Presentation:** 5%

    **Entering Pubic Debate Paper:** 25%

    **Annotated Bibliography:** An annotated bibliography is a works cited page with a brief summary and analysis of each work. As an early step in the research process, it provides the author with an inventory of information that can be referred to quickly while drafting. For this paper, you will be providing bibliographic citations and short (200-word minimum) analytical summaries of at least ten sources, including no fewer than
    three peer-reviewed academic sources. Your analytical summaries should incorporate concrete detail and quotation. Consider using the writing strategies we discussed in class: the believing game, rhetorical precis, etc.

    **Prospectus:** A prospectus is a short proposal for your research. It includes a provisional thesis, a description of background or context explaining the timeliness of your research, and a plan for how you will develop your writing in terms of intended genre and audience. Approximately 500-600 words.

    ## **Argumentative Research Essay:** Examining a "problem of consequence" connected to labor on a national or local scale. 2500-3750 words (8-12 pages) with bibliography in MLA format containing at least 5 citations.

    **PechaKucha Presentation:** Your
    final presentation will recast the argument of your research project as a PechaKucha slideshow, using 20 slides for 20 seconds each (6:40 total). 80% of your presentation grade will be based on your own presentation. The remaining 20% will be based on your attendance and participation for your classmates' presentations.

    **"Umbrella Topics":** An umbrella topic is a "big idea" that contains within it many subtopics. For this assignment, you will want to narrow your focus as much as possible, looking for a "problem of consequence" that 1) affects a large number of people; 2) requires a complex solution; and 3) is a site of ongoing disagreement between stakeholders. Potential umbrella topics for this paper include subjects such as:

    · Income Inequality (Minimum Wage, Living Wage, Universal Basic Income, etc.)

    · The Gig Economy

    · Wage Theft

    · Child Labor Laws (Undocumented workers in meatpacking, roofing, etc.)

    · Work from Home

    · Non-Compete Clauses, Non-Disclosure Agreements

    · Salary and Treatment of Campus Staff

    · Higher Education (Return on Investment)

    · On-site Childcare, Support for Breastfeeding Mothers

    · Individual and Collective Bargaining ("Right to Work" legislation, labor unions, etc.)

    · Race, Gender, Religion, Sexual Orientation, or Generational Differences in the Workplace

    · Career-Related Issues Connected to Your Major (Future Prospects, Educational Challenges, etc.)

    · Automation, Artificial Intelligence

    · Sex Work

    · The Effect of Work on Academic Performance

    **EnglishCompositionIISection04Fall2025CO-1062025-822PM.zip**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/englishcompositioniisection04fall2025co-1062025-822pm-zip)

    **## EnteringPublicDebatePrompt_2024.docx**

    **ENGL 1102: Entering Public Debate (Final Project)**

    Thus far this semester we have surveyed the work of published authors and filmmakers who have examined workplace and labor-related issues. For our final project, you will be developing an independent research project that takes up a current labor-related issue on a national or local scale. The purpose of your argument (e.g. to assert, to prevail, to inquire, or to negotiate differences) is entirely up to you, as is your audience and form.

    Your project will be made up of four components: an annotated bibliography, a prospectus, a multi-modal presentation, and an argumentative research essay of 2,500-3750 words.

    **Grade Distribution:**

    **Annotated Bibliography:** 15%

    **Prospectus:** 10%

    **PechaKucha Presentation:** 5%

    **Entering Pubic Debate Paper:** 25%

    **Annotated Bibliography:** An annotated bibliography is a works cited page with a brief summary and analysis of each work. As an early step in the research process, it provides the author with an inventory of information that can be referred to quickly while drafting. For this paper, you will be providing bibliographic citations and short (200-word minimum) analytical summaries of at least ten sources, including no fewer than
    three peer-reviewed academic sources. Your analytical summaries should incorporate concrete detail and quotation. Consider using the writing strategies we discussed in class: the believing game, rhetorical precis, etc.

    **Prospectus:** A prospectus is a short proposal for your research. It includes a provisional thesis, a description of background or context explaining the timeliness of your research, and a plan for how you will develop your writing in terms of intended genre and audience. Approximately 500-600 words.

    ## **Argumentative Research Essay:** Examining a "problem of consequence" connected to labor on a national or local scale. 2500-3750 words (8-12 pages) with bibliography in MLA format containing at least 5 citations.

    **PechaKucha Presentation:** Your
    final presentation will recast the argument of your research project as a PechaKucha slideshow, using 20 slides for 20 seconds each (6:40 total). 80% of your presentation grade will be based on your own presentation. The remaining 20% will be based on your attendance and participation for your classmates' presentations.

    **"Umbrella Topics":** An umbrella topic is a "big idea" that contains within it many subtopics. For this assignment, you will want to narrow your focus as much as possible, looking for a "problem of consequence" that 1) affects a large number of people; 2) requires a complex solution; and 3) is a site of ongoing disagreement between stakeholders. Potential umbrella topics for this paper include subjects such as:

    · Income Inequality (Minimum Wage, Living Wage, Universal Basic Income, etc.)

    · The Gig Economy

    · Wage Theft

    · Child Labor Laws (Undocumented workers in meatpacking, roofing, etc.)

    · Work from Home

    · Non-Compete Clauses, Non-Disclosure Agreements

    · Salary and Treatment of Campus Staff

    · Higher Education (Return on Investment)

    · On-site Childcare, Support for Breastfeeding Mothers

    · Individual and Collective Bargaining ("Right to Work" legislation, labor unions, etc.)

    · Race, Gender, Religion, Sexual Orientation, or Generational Differences in the Workplace

    · Career-Related Issues Connected to Your Major (Future Prospects, Educational Challenges, etc.)

    · Automation, Artificial Intelligence

    · Sex Work

    · The Effect of Work on Academic Performance

    **EnglishCompositionIISection04Fall2025CO-1062025-822PM.zip**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/englishcompositioniisection04fall2025co-1062025-822pm-zip)

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Locate a mass media article published **within the last year** that describes findings of an epidemiological study. Be sure that the article is about an epidemiological study and not another area of population health. – Then, use the Walden Library to locate the peer-reviewed research article on w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Locate a mass media article published **within the last year** that describes findings of an epidemiological study. Be sure that the article is about an epidemiological study and not another area of population health.
    – Then, use the Walden Library to locate the peer-reviewed research article on which the mass media report is based.

  • [Solved] SBility

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SBility.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] a davis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment. Any use of AI will result in automatic 0 – ## adavis.docx **## adavis.docx** You need to write a 5-paragraph summary addressing one of the prompts below. You must have an introductory paragraph that concludes with a thesis for your summary. You need to have clear body paragrap…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment. Any use of AI will result in automatic 0

    – ## adavis.docx

    **## adavis.docx**

    You need to write a 5-paragraph summary addressing one of the prompts below. You must have an introductory paragraph that concludes with a thesis for your summary. You need to have clear body paragraph points that prove your thesis. Each body paragraph must consist of a topic sentence, evidence, and analysis of your evidence that proves your topic sentence. You also need a concluding paragraph. Your paragraphs need to be at least 5 sentences. This summary is to determine your writing skills. Do not use outside sources just your head. 1. Some people are actively involved in promoting and supporting a cause. Is there a cause you actively support? Write an summary convincing readers to support that cause. 2. All-girl schools have been gaining popularity in recent years because of the belief that girls learn better when they aren’t competing with or intimidated by boys, who statistically get more attention in the classroom. Do you think single-sex schools are a good idea? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 3. We all have favorite activities that we enjoy. Write an summary convincing readers to try the activity that you enjoy most. 4. Write an summary convincing readers to break a specific habit that is harmful to their physical, emotional, or financial health. 5. Have you ever traveled to a place that you found very meaningful and rewarding? Write an summary that persuades others to visit this important place

    **## adavis.docx**

    You need to write a 5-paragraph summary addressing one of the prompts below. You must have an introductory paragraph that concludes with a thesis for your summary. You need to have clear body paragraph points that prove your thesis. Each body paragraph must consist of a topic sentence, evidence, and analysis of your evidence that proves your topic sentence. You also need a concluding paragraph. Your paragraphs need to be at least 5 sentences. This summary is to determine your writing skills. Do not use outside sources just your head. 1. Some people are actively involved in promoting and supporting a cause. Is there a cause you actively support? Write an summary convincing readers to support that cause. 2. All-girl schools have been gaining popularity in recent years because of the belief that girls learn better when they aren’t competing with or intimidated by boys, who statistically get more attention in the classroom. Do you think single-sex schools are a good idea? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 3. We all have favorite activities that we enjoy. Write an summary convincing readers to try the activity that you enjoy most. 4. Write an summary convincing readers to break a specific habit that is harmful to their physical, emotional, or financial health. 5. Have you ever traveled to a place that you found very meaningful and rewarding? Write an summary that persuades others to visit this important place

  • [Solved] labreport25

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    read document – ## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf – ## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf – pag2.jpg – pag1.jpg – IMG_0412.png – IMG_0410.png **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf** Laboratory Report Guidelines TO DO Laboratory Report Guidelines These reports should…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    read document

    – ## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf

    – ## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf

    – pag2.jpg
    – pag1.jpg
    – IMG_0412.png
    – IMG_0410.png

    **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf**

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    These reports should follow general scientific guidelines. Herein we provide some fundamentals of
    writing reports. There is also a sample laboratory report with comments that you are strongly
    encouraged to check. Finally, the assessment rubrics, which your instructor or TA will use, should
    provide you with a clear idea of what is expected of you and your written reports. Make sure you review
    the lab report rubric before turning in your report. There are also a lot of other resources available to
    you at USF (e.g. Writing Studio) that can provide you with a clear idea of how to format and write
    laboratory reports. Also, check with your instructor or TA to see if they have any specific requirements
    for the written reports that you might want to consider.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports, much like scientific articles, contain the following sections: title page, introduction,
    methods (experimental section), results, discussion, conclusion, and references. In your reports, you
    will also be asked to include a Research Connection section. Most scientific articles also contain an
    abstract, but this will not be necessary for your reports.

    Title Page: This should be the first page of your report. Include the title of your report, your name, the
    course and section number, your instructor's name, and the date the paper is due. There are many
    online sources that could help you in creating informative titles for your report. Do not simply copy the
    name of the project from the laboratory manual.

    Introduction: In this section, you should introduce the reader to what you are trying to explain, and why
    it is important. Explicitly detail your project objectives and why the proposed experimental procedure
    will be effective in addressing those objectives. Include citations to valid and credible resources and
    references beyond the laboratory manual and your TA. Remember to clearly describe the source of the
    information and include it in the Reference section at the end of your report. The introduction section
    should be quite extensive and as comprehensive as possible in order to provide the reader with a good
    understanding of your project and the chemistry behind it.

    Methods (or Experimental Section): In this section you explain to the reader how you went about your
    work, and why you did it in that manner. This should be detailed; others should be able to replicate your
    work!

    Results: Use this section to include the data that helps you answer the project objectives. You will often
    need to present your results in tables, graphs and figures. However, keep in mind that you should not
    simply include tables and graphs without explaining the relevance of the data!

    Discussion: In this section you need to address how you interpret the results? Why are they relevant to
    include in your report? What are the particular strengths or weaknesses of your methods or analysis?
    These are all questions that readers are likely to want to know. By the time you have addressed these
    questions, you are ready to conclude your paper.

    Conclusions: In this section you need to provide a summary of the results and discussion. This is the
    outcome of your investigation and again should explicitly tie to what you said you were going to
    investigate in the introduction.

    The Results, Discussion and Conclusion sections are included as one in the laboratory report rubric.
    However, scientific articles have a separate subsection for each of them. Other reports may have a
    "Results and Discussion" section and a "Conclusion" section. Whereas other reports may have a
    "Results" section, and a "Discussion" section that also concludes the report. So, the decision of how to
    organize these sections will be up to you.

    References: Use this section to tell the reader where to find the sources of information you used in your
    report. In the body of the report, particularly in the Introduction and Discussion sections, you should
    have cited other sources. Refer to the Sample Laboratory Report for general examples!

    Also, you can check online for more detailed information on how to correctly cite a reference. The
    American Chemical Society (ACS) style should be followed in your lab report.

    Research Connection: This section is not a normal component of scientific reports. Sure, chemistry
    continually links their work to others through references, but they do not title a section Research
    Connection. For this section, if required, you are asked to consider your laboratory work, and how the
    work you have completed connects to current chemistry research. You may have to consult some
    outside resources for this.

    GUIDING IDEAS AND PLANNING QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with the material you are working with?
    2. What common criteria for assessing water quality will you use?
    3. Bring a water sample from the community. At the end of this project, you will compile your data with
    all other groups in your lab. Therefore, it will be important to note the date, time, and location of your
    sample collection. Water samples should be obtained from unfiltered sources.
    4. Is there a criterion you can use to base your judgments on water hardness?
    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your water samples will you test?
    6. How can the water hardness be reduced? What is the material used in the water softener systems
    that reduces the hardness of water?
    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixture type)?
    8. Is time a factor when using a filtration system? How long must the water be in contact with the
    filtration system?

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    1. What conclusions can you draw about the quality of the water you have tested? Are these
    conclusions in the range of accepted standards?
    2. What level of certainty do you have in your judgments? How will the number of trials you have tested
    play into your confidence?
    3. Another group analyzed the same sample as you; please find a way to share your findings and make
    a record of their findings. This will help you with your post-lab report.
    4. It would be a good idea to discuss your strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What analysis
    might be helpful? Are you using a criterion to judge the water hardness? Does your criterion provide
    you with any ideas about how you may want to analyze the compiled data?
    5. Is your water hardness data comparable with standard water samples from the city of Tampa?
    6. Compare your results with the data obtained from your peers in the lab, can you explain the
    similitudes or discrepancies?
    7. By how much did you soften your water sample?
    8. Compare the water hardness measurements obtained using the conductivity meter, pH meter, and
    water hardness strips. Are there any discrepancies? If so, why might they occur?
    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to investigate other aspects of water quality?

    THINGS YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER FOR YOUR REPORT

    1. What is your final assessment of the quality of drinking water for the water you analyzed?
    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?
    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates' claims who analyzed the same water? If not, it may
    be helpful to attempt to justify the differences.
    4. What judgments would you make about the water hardness of the community's water?
    5. Remember to use the compiled data from your lab section for your report. Were there any patterns in
    the data that suggest the hardness of water across the community varies?
    6. How much hardness did you reduce using the filtration system?
    7. Remember that we want you to connect your experimental work to research. What kind of similarities
    do you find between your lab work and what you understand from research (refer to the research
    connection in this document and other resources you find for this)? What kind of differences do you
    see?
    8. Do not forget to get information about the water quality of the city of Tampa (hardness) and compare
    it with your results.

    **## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf**

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    Your laboratory reports should follow standard scientific writing conventions. Below are the

    essential components and recommendations for creating clear, professional, and well-structured

    reports.

    You are strongly encouraged to review the sample laboratory report with comments

    provided, as well as the assessment rubric your instructor or TA will use to evaluate your work.

    Reviewing the rubric before submission will help ensure that your report meets all expectations.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports—similar to scientific journal articles—should include the following sections:

    Title Page, Introduction, Methods (Experimental Section), Results, Discussion, Conclusion,

    and References.

    In addition, you will include a Research Connection section. While most scientific papers

    include an abstract, it is not required for your lab reports.

    Title Page

    The title page should be the first page of your report and include:

    • The report title (create an informative and original title; do not simply copy from the lab

    manual)

    • Your name

    • Course and section number

    • Instructor’s name

    • Due date

    Introduction

    In this section, introduce the purpose and significance of your experiment. Clearly state your

    objectives and explain why the experimental procedure effectively addresses them.

    Include citations from credible sources beyond the lab manual or your TA, and properly

    reference all information in the References section. The introduction should be detailed enough

    to give the reader a solid understanding of your project and the chemistry concepts involved.

    Methods (Experimental Section)

    Describe how you conducted your experiment and why you chose those methods. This section

    should be detailed enough for another person to replicate your work based on your description.

    Results

    Present the data that supports your objectives. Use tables, graphs, and figures where

    appropriate, but remember to explain their significance—do not simply include visuals without

    context or discussion.

    Discussion

    Interpret your results here. Explain:

    • What your results mean

    • Why they are relevant

    • The strengths and weaknesses of your methods and analysis

    Address any unexpected findings and compare them to your initial objectives or hypotheses.

    Conclusions

    Summarize your key findings and interpretations. Connect your conclusions directly to your

    stated objectives in the introduction.

    Note: In the lab report rubric, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion are combined. However, in

    formal scientific writing, they are often presented as separate sections. You may choose your

    preferred structure.

    References

    List all sources used in your report. Be sure that every source cited in your Introduction and

    Discussion is included here. Follow the American Chemical Society (ACS) citation style.

    Refer to the sample report or online resources for citation examples.

    Research Connection

    This section is unique to your lab report. Reflect on how your experimental work relates to

    current research in chemistry. You may need to consult outside sources to explore these

    connections.

    Guiding Ideas and Planning Questions for the Project

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with your materials?

    2. Which criteria will you use to assess water quality?

    3. Bring a community water sample and record the date, time, and location of collection.

    Samples should come from unfiltered sources.

    4. What standard or criterion can you use to evaluate water hardness?

    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your samples will you test?

    6. How can water hardness be reduced? What materials in water softeners achieve this?

    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixed type)?

    8. Is time a factor when using filtration systems? How long should water remain in contact

    with the filter?

    Project Summary

    1. What conclusions can you draw about your water sample’s quality? Are your results

    within accepted standards?

    2. How confident are you in your results? How does the number of trials affect your

    confidence?

    3. Compare your findings with another group’s results from the same sample and record

    both sets of data.

    4. Develop a strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What criteria or methods will you

    use?

    5. Is your data comparable to Tampa’s standard water hardness levels?

    6. Compare your results with those of your peers. Can you explain any similarities or

    differences?

    7. By how much were you able to soften your water?

    8. Compare the hardness values obtained using conductivity meters, pH meters, and

    hardness strips. If discrepancies occur, explain possible reasons.

    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to study other aspects of water

    quality?

    Things to Consider for Your Report

    1. What is your final evaluation of the drinking water quality you analyzed?

    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?

    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates’ who tested the same sample? If not,

    justify the differences.

    4. What conclusions can you make about your community’s water hardness?

    5. Review the compiled class data—does it show variation in water hardness across the

    community?

    6. How much hardness was reduced using your filtration system?

    7. Connect your experimental findings to current scientific research. What similarities

    and differences exist?

    8. Compare your results with official data on Tampa’s water quality and discuss your

    findings.

    Follow the rubric below and these formatting guidelines to create your report:

    1. Each section, following the rubric, should have a header (Introduction, Results….
    etc.). You can add sub-headers as well if needed. The font for the headers and sub-
    headers cannot be larger than a size 14.

    2. Use Times New Roman or Calibri as font styles for the body of the report with a
    font size 12.

    3. Number your pages but exclude the title page.

    4. Your report has to be double spaced.

    5. The introduction must be written in present or future tense. The rest of the report
    must be in the past tense using passive voice. This means avoid using "you", "I", or
    "our" in your report.

    6. All the sections should be in paragraph form with the exception of the results
    section.

    7. All the data collected in the lab must be in the results section in tables as the ones
    shown below. Create the tables in WORD and do not copy/paste the tables below to
    avoid any issues. The tables must be numbered and contain a short descriptive
    title.

    8. Use Microsoft Equation Editor for ALL the calculations in your report.

    9. Your references (you can use more than 3 if needed) must follow the ACS format. A
    page can be found under the "Supporting Documents" Module titled " ACS Citation
    Sources" where you can find links to help you with the citations. Look at both and
    use the one that is easier for you to follow. There is also a link above in this page.

    **pag2.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag2-jpg)

    **pag1.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag1-jpg)

    **IMG_0412.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png-10420381)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf**

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    These reports should follow general scientific guidelines. Herein we provide some fundamentals of
    writing reports. There is also a sample laboratory report with comments that you are strongly
    encouraged to check. Finally, the assessment rubrics, which your instructor or TA will use, should
    provide you with a clear idea of what is expected of you and your written reports. Make sure you review
    the lab report rubric before turning in your report. There are also a lot of other resources available to
    you at USF (e.g. Writing Studio) that can provide you with a clear idea of how to format and write
    laboratory reports. Also, check with your instructor or TA to see if they have any specific requirements
    for the written reports that you might want to consider.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports, much like scientific articles, contain the following sections: title page, introduction,
    methods (experimental section), results, discussion, conclusion, and references. In your reports, you
    will also be asked to include a Research Connection section. Most scientific articles also contain an
    abstract, but this will not be necessary for your reports.

    Title Page: This should be the first page of your report. Include the title of your report, your name, the
    course and section number, your instructor's name, and the date the paper is due. There are many
    online sources that could help you in creating informative titles for your report. Do not simply copy the
    name of the project from the laboratory manual.

    Introduction: In this section, you should introduce the reader to what you are trying to explain, and why
    it is important. Explicitly detail your project objectives and why the proposed experimental procedure
    will be effective in addressing those objectives. Include citations to valid and credible resources and
    references beyond the laboratory manual and your TA. Remember to clearly describe the source of the
    information and include it in the Reference section at the end of your report. The introduction section
    should be quite extensive and as comprehensive as possible in order to provide the reader with a good
    understanding of your project and the chemistry behind it.

    Methods (or Experimental Section): In this section you explain to the reader how you went about your
    work, and why you did it in that manner. This should be detailed; others should be able to replicate your
    work!

    Results: Use this section to include the data that helps you answer the project objectives. You will often
    need to present your results in tables, graphs and figures. However, keep in mind that you should not
    simply include tables and graphs without explaining the relevance of the data!

    Discussion: In this section you need to address how you interpret the results? Why are they relevant to
    include in your report? What are the particular strengths or weaknesses of your methods or analysis?
    These are all questions that readers are likely to want to know. By the time you have addressed these
    questions, you are ready to conclude your paper.

    Conclusions: In this section you need to provide a summary of the results and discussion. This is the
    outcome of your investigation and again should explicitly tie to what you said you were going to
    investigate in the introduction.

    The Results, Discussion and Conclusion sections are included as one in the laboratory report rubric.
    However, scientific articles have a separate subsection for each of them. Other reports may have a
    "Results and Discussion" section and a "Conclusion" section. Whereas other reports may have a
    "Results" section, and a "Discussion" section that also concludes the report. So, the decision of how to
    organize these sections will be up to you.

    References: Use this section to tell the reader where to find the sources of information you used in your
    report. In the body of the report, particularly in the Introduction and Discussion sections, you should
    have cited other sources. Refer to the Sample Laboratory Report for general examples!

    Also, you can check online for more detailed information on how to correctly cite a reference. The
    American Chemical Society (ACS) style should be followed in your lab report.

    Research Connection: This section is not a normal component of scientific reports. Sure, chemistry
    continually links their work to others through references, but they do not title a section Research
    Connection. For this section, if required, you are asked to consider your laboratory work, and how the
    work you have completed connects to current chemistry research. You may have to consult some
    outside resources for this.

    GUIDING IDEAS AND PLANNING QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with the material you are working with?
    2. What common criteria for assessing water quality will you use?
    3. Bring a water sample from the community. At the end of this project, you will compile your data with
    all other groups in your lab. Therefore, it will be important to note the date, time, and location of your
    sample collection. Water samples should be obtained from unfiltered sources.
    4. Is there a criterion you can use to base your judgments on water hardness?
    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your water samples will you test?
    6. How can the water hardness be reduced? What is the material used in the water softener systems
    that reduces the hardness of water?
    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixture type)?
    8. Is time a factor when using a filtration system? How long must the water be in contact with the
    filtration system?

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    1. What conclusions can you draw about the quality of the water you have tested? Are these
    conclusions in the range of accepted standards?
    2. What level of certainty do you have in your judgments? How will the number of trials you have tested
    play into your confidence?
    3. Another group analyzed the same sample as you; please find a way to share your findings and make
    a record of their findings. This will help you with your post-lab report.
    4. It would be a good idea to discuss your strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What analysis
    might be helpful? Are you using a criterion to judge the water hardness? Does your criterion provide
    you with any ideas about how you may want to analyze the compiled data?
    5. Is your water hardness data comparable with standard water samples from the city of Tampa?
    6. Compare your results with the data obtained from your peers in the lab, can you explain the
    similitudes or discrepancies?
    7. By how much did you soften your water sample?
    8. Compare the water hardness measurements obtained using the conductivity meter, pH meter, and
    water hardness strips. Are there any discrepancies? If so, why might they occur?
    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to investigate other aspects of water quality?

    THINGS YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER FOR YOUR REPORT

    1. What is your final assessment of the quality of drinking water for the water you analyzed?
    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?
    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates' claims who analyzed the same water? If not, it may
    be helpful to attempt to justify the differences.
    4. What judgments would you make about the water hardness of the community's water?
    5. Remember to use the compiled data from your lab section for your report. Were there any patterns in
    the data that suggest the hardness of water across the community varies?
    6. How much hardness did you reduce using the filtration system?
    7. Remember that we want you to connect your experimental work to research. What kind of similarities
    do you find between your lab work and what you understand from research (refer to the research
    connection in this document and other resources you find for this)? What kind of differences do you
    see?
    8. Do not forget to get information about the water quality of the city of Tampa (hardness) and compare
    it with your results.

    **## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf**

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    Your laboratory reports should follow standard scientific writing conventions. Below are the

    essential components and recommendations for creating clear, professional, and well-structured

    reports.

    You are strongly encouraged to review the sample laboratory report with comments

    provided, as well as the assessment rubric your instructor or TA will use to evaluate your work.

    Reviewing the rubric before submission will help ensure that your report meets all expectations.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports—similar to scientific journal articles—should include the following sections:

    Title Page, Introduction, Methods (Experimental Section), Results, Discussion, Conclusion,

    and References.

    In addition, you will include a Research Connection section. While most scientific papers

    include an abstract, it is not required for your lab reports.

    Title Page

    The title page should be the first page of your report and include:

    • The report title (create an informative and original title; do not simply copy from the lab

    manual)

    • Your name

    • Course and section number

    • Instructor’s name

    • Due date

    Introduction

    In this section, introduce the purpose and significance of your experiment. Clearly state your

    objectives and explain why the experimental procedure effectively addresses them.

    Include citations from credible sources beyond the lab manual or your TA, and properly

    reference all information in the References section. The introduction should be detailed enough

    to give the reader a solid understanding of your project and the chemistry concepts involved.

    Methods (Experimental Section)

    Describe how you conducted your experiment and why you chose those methods. This section

    should be detailed enough for another person to replicate your work based on your description.

    Results

    Present the data that supports your objectives. Use tables, graphs, and figures where

    appropriate, but remember to explain their significance—do not simply include visuals without

    context or discussion.

    Discussion

    Interpret your results here. Explain:

    • What your results mean

    • Why they are relevant

    • The strengths and weaknesses of your methods and analysis

    Address any unexpected findings and compare them to your initial objectives or hypotheses.

    Conclusions

    Summarize your key findings and interpretations. Connect your conclusions directly to your

    stated objectives in the introduction.

    Note: In the lab report rubric, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion are combined. However, in

    formal scientific writing, they are often presented as separate sections. You may choose your

    preferred structure.

    References

    List all sources used in your report. Be sure that every source cited in your Introduction and

    Discussion is included here. Follow the American Chemical Society (ACS) citation style.

    Refer to the sample report or online resources for citation examples.

    Research Connection

    This section is unique to your lab report. Reflect on how your experimental work relates to

    current research in chemistry. You may need to consult outside sources to explore these

    connections.

    Guiding Ideas and Planning Questions for the Project

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with your materials?

    2. Which criteria will you use to assess water quality?

    3. Bring a community water sample and record the date, time, and location of collection.

    Samples should come from unfiltered sources.

    4. What standard or criterion can you use to evaluate water hardness?

    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your samples will you test?

    6. How can water hardness be reduced? What materials in water softeners achieve this?

    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixed type)?

    8. Is time a factor when using filtration systems? How long should water remain in contact

    with the filter?

    Project Summary

    1. What conclusions can you draw about your water sample’s quality? Are your results

    within accepted standards?

    2. How confident are you in your results? How does the number of trials affect your

    confidence?

    3. Compare your findings with another group’s results from the same sample and record

    both sets of data.

    4. Develop a strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What criteria or methods will you

    use?

    5. Is your data comparable to Tampa’s standard water hardness levels?

    6. Compare your results with those of your peers. Can you explain any similarities or

    differences?

    7. By how much were you able to soften your water?

    8. Compare the hardness values obtained using conductivity meters, pH meters, and

    hardness strips. If discrepancies occur, explain possible reasons.

    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to study other aspects of water

    quality?

    Things to Consider for Your Report

    1. What is your final evaluation of the drinking water quality you analyzed?

    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?

    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates’ who tested the same sample? If not,

    justify the differences.

    4. What conclusions can you make about your community’s water hardness?

    5. Review the compiled class data—does it show variation in water hardness across the

    community?

    6. How much hardness was reduced using your filtration system?

    7. Connect your experimental findings to current scientific research. What similarities

    and differences exist?

    8. Compare your results with official data on Tampa’s water quality and discuss your

    findings.

    Follow the rubric below and these formatting guidelines to create your report:

    1. Each section, following the rubric, should have a header (Introduction, Results….
    etc.). You can add sub-headers as well if needed. The font for the headers and sub-
    headers cannot be larger than a size 14.

    2. Use Times New Roman or Calibri as font styles for the body of the report with a
    font size 12.

    3. Number your pages but exclude the title page.

    4. Your report has to be double spaced.

    5. The introduction must be written in present or future tense. The rest of the report
    must be in the past tense using passive voice. This means avoid using "you", "I", or
    "our" in your report.

    6. All the sections should be in paragraph form with the exception of the results
    section.

    7. All the data collected in the lab must be in the results section in tables as the ones
    shown below. Create the tables in WORD and do not copy/paste the tables below to
    avoid any issues. The tables must be numbered and contain a short descriptive
    title.

    8. Use Microsoft Equation Editor for ALL the calculations in your report.

    9. Your references (you can use more than 3 if needed) must follow the ACS format. A
    page can be found under the "Supporting Documents" Module titled " ACS Citation
    Sources" where you can find links to help you with the citations. Look at both and
    use the one that is easier for you to follow. There is also a link above in this page.

    **pag2.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag2-jpg)

    **pag1.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag1-jpg)

    **IMG_0412.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png-10420381)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    **## Laboratory_Report_Guidelines_Original_Text.pdf**

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    These reports should follow general scientific guidelines. Herein we provide some fundamentals of
    writing reports. There is also a sample laboratory report with comments that you are strongly
    encouraged to check. Finally, the assessment rubrics, which your instructor or TA will use, should
    provide you with a clear idea of what is expected of you and your written reports. Make sure you review
    the lab report rubric before turning in your report. There are also a lot of other resources available to
    you at USF (e.g. Writing Studio) that can provide you with a clear idea of how to format and write
    laboratory reports. Also, check with your instructor or TA to see if they have any specific requirements
    for the written reports that you might want to consider.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports, much like scientific articles, contain the following sections: title page, introduction,
    methods (experimental section), results, discussion, conclusion, and references. In your reports, you
    will also be asked to include a Research Connection section. Most scientific articles also contain an
    abstract, but this will not be necessary for your reports.

    Title Page: This should be the first page of your report. Include the title of your report, your name, the
    course and section number, your instructor's name, and the date the paper is due. There are many
    online sources that could help you in creating informative titles for your report. Do not simply copy the
    name of the project from the laboratory manual.

    Introduction: In this section, you should introduce the reader to what you are trying to explain, and why
    it is important. Explicitly detail your project objectives and why the proposed experimental procedure
    will be effective in addressing those objectives. Include citations to valid and credible resources and
    references beyond the laboratory manual and your TA. Remember to clearly describe the source of the
    information and include it in the Reference section at the end of your report. The introduction section
    should be quite extensive and as comprehensive as possible in order to provide the reader with a good
    understanding of your project and the chemistry behind it.

    Methods (or Experimental Section): In this section you explain to the reader how you went about your
    work, and why you did it in that manner. This should be detailed; others should be able to replicate your
    work!

    Results: Use this section to include the data that helps you answer the project objectives. You will often
    need to present your results in tables, graphs and figures. However, keep in mind that you should not
    simply include tables and graphs without explaining the relevance of the data!

    Discussion: In this section you need to address how you interpret the results? Why are they relevant to
    include in your report? What are the particular strengths or weaknesses of your methods or analysis?
    These are all questions that readers are likely to want to know. By the time you have addressed these
    questions, you are ready to conclude your paper.

    Conclusions: In this section you need to provide a summary of the results and discussion. This is the
    outcome of your investigation and again should explicitly tie to what you said you were going to
    investigate in the introduction.

    The Results, Discussion and Conclusion sections are included as one in the laboratory report rubric.
    However, scientific articles have a separate subsection for each of them. Other reports may have a
    "Results and Discussion" section and a "Conclusion" section. Whereas other reports may have a
    "Results" section, and a "Discussion" section that also concludes the report. So, the decision of how to
    organize these sections will be up to you.

    References: Use this section to tell the reader where to find the sources of information you used in your
    report. In the body of the report, particularly in the Introduction and Discussion sections, you should
    have cited other sources. Refer to the Sample Laboratory Report for general examples!

    Also, you can check online for more detailed information on how to correctly cite a reference. The
    American Chemical Society (ACS) style should be followed in your lab report.

    Research Connection: This section is not a normal component of scientific reports. Sure, chemistry
    continually links their work to others through references, but they do not title a section Research
    Connection. For this section, if required, you are asked to consider your laboratory work, and how the
    work you have completed connects to current chemistry research. You may have to consult some
    outside resources for this.

    GUIDING IDEAS AND PLANNING QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with the material you are working with?
    2. What common criteria for assessing water quality will you use?
    3. Bring a water sample from the community. At the end of this project, you will compile your data with
    all other groups in your lab. Therefore, it will be important to note the date, time, and location of your
    sample collection. Water samples should be obtained from unfiltered sources.
    4. Is there a criterion you can use to base your judgments on water hardness?
    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your water samples will you test?
    6. How can the water hardness be reduced? What is the material used in the water softener systems
    that reduces the hardness of water?
    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixture type)?
    8. Is time a factor when using a filtration system? How long must the water be in contact with the
    filtration system?

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    1. What conclusions can you draw about the quality of the water you have tested? Are these
    conclusions in the range of accepted standards?
    2. What level of certainty do you have in your judgments? How will the number of trials you have tested
    play into your confidence?
    3. Another group analyzed the same sample as you; please find a way to share your findings and make
    a record of their findings. This will help you with your post-lab report.
    4. It would be a good idea to discuss your strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What analysis
    might be helpful? Are you using a criterion to judge the water hardness? Does your criterion provide
    you with any ideas about how you may want to analyze the compiled data?
    5. Is your water hardness data comparable with standard water samples from the city of Tampa?
    6. Compare your results with the data obtained from your peers in the lab, can you explain the
    similitudes or discrepancies?
    7. By how much did you soften your water sample?
    8. Compare the water hardness measurements obtained using the conductivity meter, pH meter, and
    water hardness strips. Are there any discrepancies? If so, why might they occur?
    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to investigate other aspects of water quality?

    THINGS YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER FOR YOUR REPORT

    1. What is your final assessment of the quality of drinking water for the water you analyzed?
    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?
    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates' claims who analyzed the same water? If not, it may
    be helpful to attempt to justify the differences.
    4. What judgments would you make about the water hardness of the community's water?
    5. Remember to use the compiled data from your lab section for your report. Were there any patterns in
    the data that suggest the hardness of water across the community varies?
    6. How much hardness did you reduce using the filtration system?
    7. Remember that we want you to connect your experimental work to research. What kind of similarities
    do you find between your lab work and what you understand from research (refer to the research
    connection in this document and other resources you find for this)? What kind of differences do you
    see?
    8. Do not forget to get information about the water quality of the city of Tampa (hardness) and compare
    it with your results.

    **## Todo1_IMG_0389_merged.pdf**

    TO DO

    Laboratory Report Guidelines

    Your laboratory reports should follow standard scientific writing conventions. Below are the

    essential components and recommendations for creating clear, professional, and well-structured

    reports.

    You are strongly encouraged to review the sample laboratory report with comments

    provided, as well as the assessment rubric your instructor or TA will use to evaluate your work.

    Reviewing the rubric before submission will help ensure that your report meets all expectations.

    General Format

    Laboratory reports—similar to scientific journal articles—should include the following sections:

    Title Page, Introduction, Methods (Experimental Section), Results, Discussion, Conclusion,

    and References.

    In addition, you will include a Research Connection section. While most scientific papers

    include an abstract, it is not required for your lab reports.

    Title Page

    The title page should be the first page of your report and include:

    • The report title (create an informative and original title; do not simply copy from the lab

    manual)

    • Your name

    • Course and section number

    • Instructor’s name

    • Due date

    Introduction

    In this section, introduce the purpose and significance of your experiment. Clearly state your

    objectives and explain why the experimental procedure effectively addresses them.

    Include citations from credible sources beyond the lab manual or your TA, and properly

    reference all information in the References section. The introduction should be detailed enough

    to give the reader a solid understanding of your project and the chemistry concepts involved.

    Methods (Experimental Section)

    Describe how you conducted your experiment and why you chose those methods. This section

    should be detailed enough for another person to replicate your work based on your description.

    Results

    Present the data that supports your objectives. Use tables, graphs, and figures where

    appropriate, but remember to explain their significance—do not simply include visuals without

    context or discussion.

    Discussion

    Interpret your results here. Explain:

    • What your results mean

    • Why they are relevant

    • The strengths and weaknesses of your methods and analysis

    Address any unexpected findings and compare them to your initial objectives or hypotheses.

    Conclusions

    Summarize your key findings and interpretations. Connect your conclusions directly to your

    stated objectives in the introduction.

    Note: In the lab report rubric, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion are combined. However, in

    formal scientific writing, they are often presented as separate sections. You may choose your

    preferred structure.

    References

    List all sources used in your report. Be sure that every source cited in your Introduction and

    Discussion is included here. Follow the American Chemical Society (ACS) citation style.

    Refer to the sample report or online resources for citation examples.

    Research Connection

    This section is unique to your lab report. Reflect on how your experimental work relates to

    current research in chemistry. You may need to consult outside sources to explore these

    connections.

    Guiding Ideas and Planning Questions for the Project

    1. What safety precautions must be taken with your materials?

    2. Which criteria will you use to assess water quality?

    3. Bring a community water sample and record the date, time, and location of collection.

    Samples should come from unfiltered sources.

    4. What standard or criterion can you use to evaluate water hardness?

    5. Which physical and chemical properties of your samples will you test?

    6. How can water hardness be reduced? What materials in water softeners achieve this?

    7. What is an ion exchange resin (sodium or mixed type)?

    8. Is time a factor when using filtration systems? How long should water remain in contact

    with the filter?

    Project Summary

    1. What conclusions can you draw about your water sample’s quality? Are your results

    within accepted standards?

    2. How confident are you in your results? How does the number of trials affect your

    confidence?

    3. Compare your findings with another group’s results from the same sample and record

    both sets of data.

    4. Develop a strategy for analyzing the compiled data. What criteria or methods will you

    use?

    5. Is your data comparable to Tampa’s standard water hardness levels?

    6. Compare your results with those of your peers. Can you explain any similarities or

    differences?

    7. By how much were you able to soften your water?

    8. Compare the hardness values obtained using conductivity meters, pH meters, and

    hardness strips. If discrepancies occur, explain possible reasons.

    9. How could this experiment be expanded or modified to study other aspects of water

    quality?

    Things to Consider for Your Report

    1. What is your final evaluation of the drinking water quality you analyzed?

    2. Does your experimental evidence support your claims?

    3. Are your claims consistent with your classmates’ who tested the same sample? If not,

    justify the differences.

    4. What conclusions can you make about your community’s water hardness?

    5. Review the compiled class data—does it show variation in water hardness across the

    community?

    6. How much hardness was reduced using your filtration system?

    7. Connect your experimental findings to current scientific research. What similarities

    and differences exist?

    8. Compare your results with official data on Tampa’s water quality and discuss your

    findings.

    Follow the rubric below and these formatting guidelines to create your report:

    1. Each section, following the rubric, should have a header (Introduction, Results….
    etc.). You can add sub-headers as well if needed. The font for the headers and sub-
    headers cannot be larger than a size 14.

    2. Use Times New Roman or Calibri as font styles for the body of the report with a
    font size 12.

    3. Number your pages but exclude the title page.

    4. Your report has to be double spaced.

    5. The introduction must be written in present or future tense. The rest of the report
    must be in the past tense using passive voice. This means avoid using "you", "I", or
    "our" in your report.

    6. All the sections should be in paragraph form with the exception of the results
    section.

    7. All the data collected in the lab must be in the results section in tables as the ones
    shown below. Create the tables in WORD and do not copy/paste the tables below to
    avoid any issues. The tables must be numbered and contain a short descriptive
    title.

    8. Use Microsoft Equation Editor for ALL the calculations in your report.

    9. Your references (you can use more than 3 if needed) must follow the ACS format. A
    page can be found under the "Supporting Documents" Module titled " ACS Citation
    Sources" where you can find links to help you with the citations. Look at both and
    use the one that is easier for you to follow. There is also a link above in this page.

    **pag2.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag2-jpg)

    **pag1.jpg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pag1-jpg)

    **IMG_0412.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0412-png-10420381)

    **IMG_0410.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0410-png-10420383)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3
    – 4
    – 5
    – 6