Category: Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

  • [Solved] DNP-IVA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #### Instructions: Based on the information discussed in this module, explain the focus of your Doctor in Nursing Practice scholarship, and relate its link to cultural care theory and translational science.Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #### Instructions:

    Based on the information discussed in this module, explain the focus of your Doctor in Nursing Practice scholarship, and relate its link to cultural care theory and translational science.Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIO IS A DOCTORATE DEGREE ASSIGNMENT
    – DUE DATE 10/02/2026

  • [Solved] DNP YO

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #### Instructions: Based on the information discussed in this module, explain the focus of your Doctor in Nursing Practice scholarship, and relate its link to cultural care theory and translational science. Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #### Instructions:

    Based on the information discussed in this module, explain the focus of your Doctor in Nursing Practice scholarship, and relate its link to cultural care theory and translational science.

    Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIO IS A DOCTORATE DEGREE ASSIGNMENT
    – DUE DATE 10/02/2026

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ 17907815182513642988867397554687.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907815182513642988867397554687-jpg "17907815182513642988867397554687.jpg") – [\ \ 17907815472405780856758704517865.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907815472405780856758704517865-jpg "1790781547240578085675870…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    17907815182513642988867397554687.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907815182513642988867397554687-jpg "17907815182513642988867397554687.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    17907815472405780856758704517865.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907815472405780856758704517865-jpg "17907815472405780856758704517865.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    17907815668834142102219977293733.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907815668834142102219977293733-jpg "17907815668834142102219977293733.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    17907815868403000151210136976216.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907815868403000151210136976216-jpg "17907815868403000151210136976216.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    17907816153023893096082189685510.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907816153023893096082189685510-jpg "17907816153023893096082189685510.jpg")
    – [\
    \
    17907816373466869930118895248689.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/17907816373466869930118895248689-jpg "17907816373466869930118895248689.jpg")

  • [Solved] what is health?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering what is health?.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] BEL-W 6 NORA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TOPIC: Reducing Maternal Mortality and Severe Morbidity via Culturally Tailored Doula Integration. A **S.M.A.R.T.** goal is defined by its five key aspects or elements. Without all aspects, you might be goal setting, but not effectively creating a plan for success. Let’s take a closer look at the fi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TOPIC: Reducing Maternal Mortality and  Severe Morbidity via Culturally Tailored Doula Integration.

    A **S.M.A.R.T.** goal is defined by its five key aspects or elements. Without all aspects, you might be goal setting, but not effectively creating a plan for success. Let’s take a closer look at the five elements of S.M.A.R.T. goals.

    **Specific**

    Specific goals have a desired outcome that is clearly understood. This might be a sales number or a product rollout goal. No matter what it is, the goal should be clearly articulated so that everyone is on the same page with the objective. Define what will be accomplished and the actions to be taken to accomplish the goal. Goal must be clearly defined —who and what

    **Measurable**

    These are the numbers used with the goal. You need to have a quantifiable objective so that you can track progress. Define what data will be used to measure the goal and set a method for collection. The success toward meeting the goal can be measured. Outcome must demonstrate levels of change or improvement.

    **Achievable**

    Goals need to be realistic in order to maintain the enthusiasm to try to achieve them. Setting lofty goals is good, but you may want to break them down into smaller, bite-sized chunks. If the goal is not doable, you may need to first ramp up resources to give yourself a shot at success. Ramping up resources would likely be its own S.M.A.R.T. goal. Goals are reasonable and can be achieved.

    **Relevant**

    Goals should be aligned with the mission of the company or the specific project at hand. Don’t set goals just as an exercise for something to do. One way to determine if the goal is relevant is to define the key benefit to the organization or your personal goal. The goals are aligned with current tasks and projects and focus on one defined area

    **Time-Bound**

    Goals should have a deadline. A goal without a deadline doesn’t do much. How can you identify success or failure? This is why S.M.A.R.T. goals set a final date. This doesn’t mean that all the work is done, but it means that you can evaluate the success of the endeavor and set new goals. Goals have a clearly defined time frame including a target or deadline date.

    **Using the information presented as a guide create a SMART goal to improve the indicators of your health problem at short or long term [this is the same health problem you will be completing the PowerPoint on]. TOPIC :** Reducing Maternal Mortality and

    Severe Morbidity via Culturally Tailored Doula Integration.

    **Your SMART goal should be listed in your Introduction of your ASSIGNMENT**

    **Include a paragraph to introduce your topic and place it in context for your reader. Do not forget to cite your sources. Utilizes at least 4 sources and all sources are current within 5 years from 2022-2026**

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **SMART** goals help improve achievement and success. A SMART goal clarifies exactly what is expected and the measures used to determine if the goal is achieved and successfully completed.

    Examples:

    Not a SMART goal:

    ·       Reach out to stakeholders.

    Does not identify a measurement or time frame, nor identify why the improvement is needed or how it will be used.

    **SMART goal:**

    ·      The Department will launch communications with stakeholders by conducting three focus groups specific to needs assessment and funding by the end of the first quarter.

    Please ensure you follow the SMART format when you are formatting your SMART GOAL and its explanations. This assignment is to be **submitted as an ASSIGNMENT- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points**. APA must be strictly followed. This assignment should be **minimally 3 pages no more than 5 pages for content**- do not exceed maximum page limit as it will incur a penalty [not counting references and title page] as the rationales utilizing EB Practice for each component of your SMART goal should be explained. **Penalty WILL BE GIVEN if you go over the page limit-be concise. Can't have more than 10% plague or AI text**

    **Due date oct 3, 2026 NO LATER**

    – [\
    \
    BELKRUBRIC.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/belkrubric-pdf "BELKRUBRIC.pdf")

  • [Solved] ANE-ROLE W6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ### **Personal Philosophy of Nursing** CREATE your personal philosophy of nursing. The ASSIGNMENT is to be typewritten and double-spaced (1,000 words) (APA 7th edition) and should include the following: 1. Introduction that includes who you are and where you practice nursing 2. Definition of nursing…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ### **Personal Philosophy of Nursing**

    CREATE your personal philosophy of nursing. The ASSIGNMENT is to be typewritten and double-spaced (1,000 words) (APA 7th edition) and should include the following:

    1. Introduction that includes who you are and where you practice nursing
    2. Definition of nursing
    3. Assumptions or underlying beliefs
    4. Definitions and examples of the major domains of nursing
    5.  A summary that includes answers to the following questions:

    a. How are the domains connected?  b. What is your vision of nursing for the future?  c. What are the challenges that you will face as a nurse? d. What are your goals for professional development? **Grading Criteria for the Philosophy of Nursing**

    Introduction                                                                                                          10%

    Definition of nursing                                                                                            20%

    Assumptions or underlying beliefs                                                                     20%

    Definitions of major domains of nursing                                                           25%

    Summary                                                                                                                 10%

    Organization, focus, grammar, spelling,punctuation, and usage (writing rubric)                                                             10%

    APA                                                                                                                             5%                                                    Total                                                                  100%

    DUE DATE 10/03/2026

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIO PLEASE

  • [Solved] ANE PICOT 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    NOTE THE DOCUMETS ATTACHED DUE DATE 10/03/2026 **files (3)** – ## ANEPICOT2.pdf – ## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx – ANETRESEARCHW3.docx **## ANEPICOT2.pdf** Florida National University PICOT / Research Assignment PICOT Question Among adult patients with heart failure being discharged from a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    NOTE THE DOCUMETS ATTACHED

    DUE DATE 10/03/2026

    **files (3)**

    – ## ANEPICOT2.pdf

    – ## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx

    – ANETRESEARCHW3.docx

    **## ANEPICOT2.pdf**

    Florida National University

    PICOT / Research Assignment

    PICOT Question

    Among adult patients with heart failure being
    discharged from acute care hospitals
    (P), what effect does the provision of daily weight
    training with regular nurse calls per week
    (I) have on 30-day readmissions to the hospital (O)
    when compared with the current
    discharge procedures (C) Over 12 weeks (T).

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10 % OF PLAGIO OR AI
    TEXT

    NEED TO STRICTLY FOLLOW REQUIREMENT ,
    RUBRIC AND TEMPLATE OF EXAMPLE PROVIDED
    PLEASE

    PART 1 ATTACHED TO GUIDE AS WELL

    PURPOSE
    The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your
    PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

    GENERAL DIRECTIONS
    1. As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles.

    On finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the
    conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

    1

    Florida National University
    2. Locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. Write an annotation for

    each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA
    citation for each article.

    3. Refer to the Annotated Bibliographies sample located in the assignment tab for additional
    guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    1. Title Page

    2. Introduction with the PICOT question

    3. Annotated Bibliography 6 articles that support you’re your PICOT

    a. Article reference in APA format

    b. Summary of each article

    i. Purpose

    ii. Research question

    iii. Methodology

    iv. Results

    v. Conclusion

    DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE)

    Category Points Description

    Introduction 10 The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief
    summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose
    statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).

    PICOT
    Question

    10 State the quantitative PICOT question in a clear and concise sentence.

    References 20 Correct APA citation for each article.

    Summary
    (purpose)

    10 Describe the purpose of the article in dimple words

    Summary
    (Research
    question)

    10 Describe the research question if applied

    Summary
    (Methodology)

    10 Briefly describe the scientific method use in each article

    2

    Florida National University

    GRADING RUBRIC: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE) COMPONENT

    Summary
    (Results)

    10 Summarize the results for each article

    Summary
    (conclusion)

    10 Summarize the conclusion for each article

    APA
    formatting,
    scholarly
    writing

    10 Follow APA formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without
    grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc.

    Total 100 A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements.

    Assignment
    Criteria

    A
    Outstanding or
    highest level of

    performance

    B
    Very good or high

    level of
    performance

    C
    Competent or

    saMsfactory level
    of performance

    F
    Poor or failing or

    unsaMsfactory
    level of

    performance

    Introduction
    10 points

    Introduction is clearly
    conveyed and
    summarizes the
    primary intent of the
    paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    9-10 points

    Introduction is
    conveyed and
    outlines the primary
    intent of the paper. A
    formal purpose
    statement is
    included.

    8 points

    Introduction includes
    the primary intent of
    the paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    7 points

    Introduction is
    vague and/or not
    included. The
    primary intent of
    the paper is not
    conveyed. There is
    no purpose
    statement
    included; purpose
    of the paper is
    unclear.

    0-6 points
    P I C O T
    Question

    10 points

    Correctly and
    concisely states a
    quantitative PICOT
    question in one-
    sentence.

    9-10 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    fails to be concise.

    8 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    may have one or two
    elements incorrect.

    7 points

    Fails to state a
    quantitative PICOT
    question and/or
    may have three or
    more elements
    incorrect.

    0–5 points

    A r t i c l e
    references
    20 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format

    9-10 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with 2 to three errors
    in the format

    8-6 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with more than three
    errors in the format

    5 -3points

    Provide the
    reference but not
    in APA format

    0–3 points

    3

    Florida National University

    S u m m a r y
    (purpose)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally describes
    the purpose of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    purpose of some
    articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    purpose of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    ( R e s e a r c h
    question)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    research question of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the research
    question of each
    article
    .

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    research question of
    some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    research question
    of the articles

    0–2 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Methodology
    )

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    scientific method of
    each article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the scientific method
    of each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    scientific method of
    some articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    scientific method
    of the articles

    0–6 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Results)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the results of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the results of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the results
    of some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    results of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    (conclusion)

    .
    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    conclusion of each
    article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the conclusion of
    each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    conclusion of some
    articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    conclusion of the
    articles

    0-6 points

    A P A
    f o r m a t t i n g ,
    s c h o l a r l y
    writing
    10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with no
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Follows
    the rules of APA
    formatting.

    9-10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with minimal
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors.
    Follows the rules of
    APA formatting.

    8 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with several
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Breaks
    minor rules of APA
    formatting.

    7 points

    Does not write in a
    scholarly manner.
    Commits many
    errors in grammar,
    spelling, and
    syntax. Does not
    follow rules for APA
    formatting.

    0–6 points

    Total Points Possible = 150 points

    4

    Florida National University

    5

    – Purpose
    – General directions
    – Annotated bibliography
    – Directions and Grading Criteria: PICOT (written/narrative)
    – Grading Rubric: PICOT (written/narrative) Component

    **## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1

    2

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Annotated bibliography

    Introduction

    PICOT question:

    Annotated Bibliography

    1. Ann, M. H., Davis, A., & Glowatz, T. (2015). Development of a diabetes learning needs assessment tool to promote an individualized predischarge patient education plan. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11), 484-486. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-12

    The purpose of this artic le is to motivate nurses’ staff to empower patient to improve their understanding of their diabetes management. The article emphasizes the importance of the knowledge and successful glycemic control in diabetic patients. Therefore, Authors promote the necessity of implement a pre-discharge patient education plan to identify and address the knowledge and skill needed for diabetic patients after discharge. The pre-discharge need assessment consist in several questions that the nurse can ask to patient such us: What medication do you take? Do you know how to administer correctly those medications? Are you in insulin? Do you how to how to drawing it up and injecting it? Do you know what A1C is? Etc. The experiment was done to 44 diabetes patients. The need assessment was used in the admission and in discharge day. Nurses used the data collected to select appropriate learning materials and used them to reinforce the patients’ knowledge. As a result, the diabetic education increased in from 36% to 63% in five months. The documentation of diabetes education also increased because nurses understood the importance of the education in diabetic patients.

    2. Blackman, N. (2008). The development of an assessment tool for the bereavement needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 165-170. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=33863849&site=ehost-live

    The aim of this article is the development of a bereavement needs assessment tool to assess the need for crisis intervention for people with learning disabilities after a family death. With the assessment tools, health professionals can make a comprehensive assessment at the bereavement time to discover the problem and a plan can be put it in action. The tool was developed with the recompilation of several collected experience over the years of supporting grieving people with learning disabilities. The assessment tool has ten questions with sub- questions. The main points of the assessment are the practical issues, social issues, and emotional issues. The assessment tool has been tried out in three community teams and their results are being used to redefine the tool. The author will incorporate findings from research results to the assessment tool to refine the bereavement assessment. The used of the bereavement assessment toll will promote discussion and reflection among health care providers about losses in people with learning disability.

    3. Ewing, G., & Grande, G. (2013). Development of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 244-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216312440607

    The authors of this article recognized the need to assess and support the care givers that are providing end- of – life care to help them in their caring role. The purpose of this article is to collect care givers’ perception of key aspects of end of life care at home and to create a need assessment tool that can be used every day. A qualitative research method was done. Seventy five adult care givers for hospice patients we interviewed in the United Kingdom. They were divided in nine focus groups. Twenty two participants had private interviews no more than ten minutes in duration. All participants sing their informed consent before the experiment started. The assessment tool used evaluated 14 domains of support needs within physical, practical, social, financial, physiological, and spiritual needs that the care givers may have. The experimental study identified two brad groups of support that the care givers need. The first one was to enable them to care for their relatives and the second one to have more support for them. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool that was used in this research is an evidence based toll to measure the care givers support needs.

    4. Jenkins, J. O. (2010). A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognizing the learning needs of students. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(5), 565-576.Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=53155623&site=ehost-live

    The purpose of this article is to create a multi-faceted formative assessment that enabled student to be more engage in the assessment process. The assessment will better meet the students’ learning and assessment needs. The approaches in this article put the students in the center of the learning experience to improve students understanding the assessment. The multifaceted formative assessment had six initiatives: (1) The creation of subject specific reader that present more clearly the purpose of the assessment, (2) The assessment was refocused depend on the hours involved and not in the number of words that it has, (3) The amount of assignment was reduced, (4) The assessment had detailed guidance notes to help creating an effective self-study environment, (4) an assignment tutorial was created to facilitate discussion of the assignment to improve learning, and (6) an E-learning environment was introduced to enhance the assignment submissions and comments that will help in the assessment’s formative process. The results of the assessment were done by reading and analyzing the students’ feedback and perceptions of the assessment process. The results of this study indicate that the development of a module reader was useful for the students to be engaged with the subject being studied. It also shown that the assignment tutorial and guidance note helped them to be more engage with the assessment. Therefore, the author of this article recommends that other subjects use the readers, assignment –based tutorials and the guidance note to help the student with their learning process

    5. Kamaraj, D. C., Dicianno, B. E., & Cooper, R. A. (2014). A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. BioMed Research International, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541614

    The development of evidence based training protocol for electric powered wheelchair users such us disability persons has been a challenge because of a lack of standardized assessment toll. The purpose of this article is to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool (PMST) and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment (PMCDA). The research method was a qualitative participatory research. The research was done an approved by the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional. Twenty one participants were agreed to participate in the surveys and in the focus groups phases of the research. In the process, there were two surveys to create a list of items that will be including in the PMST and in the PMCDA. The participants rank, in the surveys, each of the screening tests in order of importance. After the survey was done, he participant were invited to participate in a focus group in which they discuss two sections the screen tool and the assessment tool. The results of this research realized tree standards that need to be fallow in the creation of the assessments. First, the goal of the PMCDA should toward improving mobility and independence of individual with disability rather than improve the access to the wheel chair. Second, the goal should be measurable so can identify progress with training. Third, the measurement should be able to recognized areas in which trainings should improve. Because this research was done with a small sample group, authors subject that further testing is needed to evaluate the effectivity of administrating these tools in clinical environment

    6. Macan, T., Konczak, L., & Breaugh, J. (2013). At your service: Blending science and practice to develop a customer service assessment tool. Applied H.R.M.Research, 13(1), 24-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448424808?accountid=458

    This article describes specific strategies and factors that can be utilized to achieve the high quality customer services oriented in an organization. This article explains a detail a project that involves the development of a customer service oriented paper and pencil assessment. The purpose of this article was to share different approaches to be considered in order to achieve high quality services. The article included five practical challenges that the organizations can face in this project. Those challenges explain were (1) Cost effectiveness and administrative efficiency,(2) Get the attention to the stakeholders, (3)Diversity of the applicants, (4) Balance statistic and practical significance, and (5) Gather multiple forms of validity evidence. The authors created an assessment tools taking into consideration those five challenge. They created an assessment tool to measure employee performance for part time positions. The assessment tool has 27 items that can be done in ten minutes and it is ease to score by hand. The assessment tool was made by taking into consideration age and race diversity of the applicants. The assessment is ease to read with the fifth grade reading level. The authors highlight the necessity of doing more researchers to provide more evidence for using the different approaches used in the study to have better strategies in implementing an innovative and scientific assessment measures.

    **ANETRESEARCHW3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anetresearchw3-docx)

    **ANETRESEARCHW3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anetresearchw3-docx)

    **## ANEPICOT2.pdf**

    Florida National University

    PICOT / Research Assignment

    PICOT Question

    Among adult patients with heart failure being
    discharged from acute care hospitals
    (P), what effect does the provision of daily weight
    training with regular nurse calls per week
    (I) have on 30-day readmissions to the hospital (O)
    when compared with the current
    discharge procedures (C) Over 12 weeks (T).

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10 % OF PLAGIO OR AI
    TEXT

    NEED TO STRICTLY FOLLOW REQUIREMENT ,
    RUBRIC AND TEMPLATE OF EXAMPLE PROVIDED
    PLEASE

    PART 1 ATTACHED TO GUIDE AS WELL

    PURPOSE
    The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your
    PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

    GENERAL DIRECTIONS
    1. As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles.

    On finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the
    conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

    1

    Florida National University
    2. Locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. Write an annotation for

    each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA
    citation for each article.

    3. Refer to the Annotated Bibliographies sample located in the assignment tab for additional
    guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    1. Title Page

    2. Introduction with the PICOT question

    3. Annotated Bibliography 6 articles that support you’re your PICOT

    a. Article reference in APA format

    b. Summary of each article

    i. Purpose

    ii. Research question

    iii. Methodology

    iv. Results

    v. Conclusion

    DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE)

    Category Points Description

    Introduction 10 The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief
    summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose
    statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).

    PICOT
    Question

    10 State the quantitative PICOT question in a clear and concise sentence.

    References 20 Correct APA citation for each article.

    Summary
    (purpose)

    10 Describe the purpose of the article in dimple words

    Summary
    (Research
    question)

    10 Describe the research question if applied

    Summary
    (Methodology)

    10 Briefly describe the scientific method use in each article

    2

    Florida National University

    GRADING RUBRIC: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE) COMPONENT

    Summary
    (Results)

    10 Summarize the results for each article

    Summary
    (conclusion)

    10 Summarize the conclusion for each article

    APA
    formatting,
    scholarly
    writing

    10 Follow APA formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without
    grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc.

    Total 100 A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements.

    Assignment
    Criteria

    A
    Outstanding or
    highest level of

    performance

    B
    Very good or high

    level of
    performance

    C
    Competent or

    saMsfactory level
    of performance

    F
    Poor or failing or

    unsaMsfactory
    level of

    performance

    Introduction
    10 points

    Introduction is clearly
    conveyed and
    summarizes the
    primary intent of the
    paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    9-10 points

    Introduction is
    conveyed and
    outlines the primary
    intent of the paper. A
    formal purpose
    statement is
    included.

    8 points

    Introduction includes
    the primary intent of
    the paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    7 points

    Introduction is
    vague and/or not
    included. The
    primary intent of
    the paper is not
    conveyed. There is
    no purpose
    statement
    included; purpose
    of the paper is
    unclear.

    0-6 points
    P I C O T
    Question

    10 points

    Correctly and
    concisely states a
    quantitative PICOT
    question in one-
    sentence.

    9-10 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    fails to be concise.

    8 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    may have one or two
    elements incorrect.

    7 points

    Fails to state a
    quantitative PICOT
    question and/or
    may have three or
    more elements
    incorrect.

    0–5 points

    A r t i c l e
    references
    20 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format

    9-10 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with 2 to three errors
    in the format

    8-6 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with more than three
    errors in the format

    5 -3points

    Provide the
    reference but not
    in APA format

    0–3 points

    3

    Florida National University

    S u m m a r y
    (purpose)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally describes
    the purpose of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    purpose of some
    articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    purpose of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    ( R e s e a r c h
    question)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    research question of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the research
    question of each
    article
    .

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    research question of
    some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    research question
    of the articles

    0–2 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Methodology
    )

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    scientific method of
    each article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the scientific method
    of each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    scientific method of
    some articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    scientific method
    of the articles

    0–6 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Results)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the results of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the results of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the results
    of some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    results of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    (conclusion)

    .
    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    conclusion of each
    article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the conclusion of
    each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    conclusion of some
    articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    conclusion of the
    articles

    0-6 points

    A P A
    f o r m a t t i n g ,
    s c h o l a r l y
    writing
    10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with no
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Follows
    the rules of APA
    formatting.

    9-10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with minimal
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors.
    Follows the rules of
    APA formatting.

    8 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with several
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Breaks
    minor rules of APA
    formatting.

    7 points

    Does not write in a
    scholarly manner.
    Commits many
    errors in grammar,
    spelling, and
    syntax. Does not
    follow rules for APA
    formatting.

    0–6 points

    Total Points Possible = 150 points

    4

    Florida National University

    5

    – Purpose
    – General directions
    – Annotated bibliography
    – Directions and Grading Criteria: PICOT (written/narrative)
    – Grading Rubric: PICOT (written/narrative) Component

    **## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1

    2

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Annotated bibliography

    Introduction

    PICOT question:

    Annotated Bibliography

    1. Ann, M. H., Davis, A., & Glowatz, T. (2015). Development of a diabetes learning needs assessment tool to promote an individualized predischarge patient education plan. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11), 484-486. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-12

    The purpose of this artic le is to motivate nurses’ staff to empower patient to improve their understanding of their diabetes management. The article emphasizes the importance of the knowledge and successful glycemic control in diabetic patients. Therefore, Authors promote the necessity of implement a pre-discharge patient education plan to identify and address the knowledge and skill needed for diabetic patients after discharge. The pre-discharge need assessment consist in several questions that the nurse can ask to patient such us: What medication do you take? Do you know how to administer correctly those medications? Are you in insulin? Do you how to how to drawing it up and injecting it? Do you know what A1C is? Etc. The experiment was done to 44 diabetes patients. The need assessment was used in the admission and in discharge day. Nurses used the data collected to select appropriate learning materials and used them to reinforce the patients’ knowledge. As a result, the diabetic education increased in from 36% to 63% in five months. The documentation of diabetes education also increased because nurses understood the importance of the education in diabetic patients.

    2. Blackman, N. (2008). The development of an assessment tool for the bereavement needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 165-170. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=33863849&site=ehost-live

    The aim of this article is the development of a bereavement needs assessment tool to assess the need for crisis intervention for people with learning disabilities after a family death. With the assessment tools, health professionals can make a comprehensive assessment at the bereavement time to discover the problem and a plan can be put it in action. The tool was developed with the recompilation of several collected experience over the years of supporting grieving people with learning disabilities. The assessment tool has ten questions with sub- questions. The main points of the assessment are the practical issues, social issues, and emotional issues. The assessment tool has been tried out in three community teams and their results are being used to redefine the tool. The author will incorporate findings from research results to the assessment tool to refine the bereavement assessment. The used of the bereavement assessment toll will promote discussion and reflection among health care providers about losses in people with learning disability.

    3. Ewing, G., & Grande, G. (2013). Development of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 244-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216312440607

    The authors of this article recognized the need to assess and support the care givers that are providing end- of – life care to help them in their caring role. The purpose of this article is to collect care givers’ perception of key aspects of end of life care at home and to create a need assessment tool that can be used every day. A qualitative research method was done. Seventy five adult care givers for hospice patients we interviewed in the United Kingdom. They were divided in nine focus groups. Twenty two participants had private interviews no more than ten minutes in duration. All participants sing their informed consent before the experiment started. The assessment tool used evaluated 14 domains of support needs within physical, practical, social, financial, physiological, and spiritual needs that the care givers may have. The experimental study identified two brad groups of support that the care givers need. The first one was to enable them to care for their relatives and the second one to have more support for them. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool that was used in this research is an evidence based toll to measure the care givers support needs.

    4. Jenkins, J. O. (2010). A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognizing the learning needs of students. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(5), 565-576.Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=53155623&site=ehost-live

    The purpose of this article is to create a multi-faceted formative assessment that enabled student to be more engage in the assessment process. The assessment will better meet the students’ learning and assessment needs. The approaches in this article put the students in the center of the learning experience to improve students understanding the assessment. The multifaceted formative assessment had six initiatives: (1) The creation of subject specific reader that present more clearly the purpose of the assessment, (2) The assessment was refocused depend on the hours involved and not in the number of words that it has, (3) The amount of assignment was reduced, (4) The assessment had detailed guidance notes to help creating an effective self-study environment, (4) an assignment tutorial was created to facilitate discussion of the assignment to improve learning, and (6) an E-learning environment was introduced to enhance the assignment submissions and comments that will help in the assessment’s formative process. The results of the assessment were done by reading and analyzing the students’ feedback and perceptions of the assessment process. The results of this study indicate that the development of a module reader was useful for the students to be engaged with the subject being studied. It also shown that the assignment tutorial and guidance note helped them to be more engage with the assessment. Therefore, the author of this article recommends that other subjects use the readers, assignment –based tutorials and the guidance note to help the student with their learning process

    5. Kamaraj, D. C., Dicianno, B. E., & Cooper, R. A. (2014). A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. BioMed Research International, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541614

    The development of evidence based training protocol for electric powered wheelchair users such us disability persons has been a challenge because of a lack of standardized assessment toll. The purpose of this article is to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool (PMST) and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment (PMCDA). The research method was a qualitative participatory research. The research was done an approved by the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional. Twenty one participants were agreed to participate in the surveys and in the focus groups phases of the research. In the process, there were two surveys to create a list of items that will be including in the PMST and in the PMCDA. The participants rank, in the surveys, each of the screening tests in order of importance. After the survey was done, he participant were invited to participate in a focus group in which they discuss two sections the screen tool and the assessment tool. The results of this research realized tree standards that need to be fallow in the creation of the assessments. First, the goal of the PMCDA should toward improving mobility and independence of individual with disability rather than improve the access to the wheel chair. Second, the goal should be measurable so can identify progress with training. Third, the measurement should be able to recognized areas in which trainings should improve. Because this research was done with a small sample group, authors subject that further testing is needed to evaluate the effectivity of administrating these tools in clinical environment

    6. Macan, T., Konczak, L., & Breaugh, J. (2013). At your service: Blending science and practice to develop a customer service assessment tool. Applied H.R.M.Research, 13(1), 24-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448424808?accountid=458

    This article describes specific strategies and factors that can be utilized to achieve the high quality customer services oriented in an organization. This article explains a detail a project that involves the development of a customer service oriented paper and pencil assessment. The purpose of this article was to share different approaches to be considered in order to achieve high quality services. The article included five practical challenges that the organizations can face in this project. Those challenges explain were (1) Cost effectiveness and administrative efficiency,(2) Get the attention to the stakeholders, (3)Diversity of the applicants, (4) Balance statistic and practical significance, and (5) Gather multiple forms of validity evidence. The authors created an assessment tools taking into consideration those five challenge. They created an assessment tool to measure employee performance for part time positions. The assessment tool has 27 items that can be done in ten minutes and it is ease to score by hand. The assessment tool was made by taking into consideration age and race diversity of the applicants. The assessment is ease to read with the fifth grade reading level. The authors highlight the necessity of doing more researchers to provide more evidence for using the different approaches used in the study to have better strategies in implementing an innovative and scientific assessment measures.

    **ANETRESEARCHW3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anetresearchw3-docx)

    **## ANEPICOT2.pdf**

    Florida National University

    PICOT / Research Assignment

    PICOT Question

    Among adult patients with heart failure being
    discharged from acute care hospitals
    (P), what effect does the provision of daily weight
    training with regular nurse calls per week
    (I) have on 30-day readmissions to the hospital (O)
    when compared with the current
    discharge procedures (C) Over 12 weeks (T).

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10 % OF PLAGIO OR AI
    TEXT

    NEED TO STRICTLY FOLLOW REQUIREMENT ,
    RUBRIC AND TEMPLATE OF EXAMPLE PROVIDED
    PLEASE

    PART 1 ATTACHED TO GUIDE AS WELL

    PURPOSE
    The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your
    PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

    GENERAL DIRECTIONS
    1. As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles.

    On finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the
    conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

    1

    Florida National University
    2. Locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. Write an annotation for

    each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA
    citation for each article.

    3. Refer to the Annotated Bibliographies sample located in the assignment tab for additional
    guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    1. Title Page

    2. Introduction with the PICOT question

    3. Annotated Bibliography 6 articles that support you’re your PICOT

    a. Article reference in APA format

    b. Summary of each article

    i. Purpose

    ii. Research question

    iii. Methodology

    iv. Results

    v. Conclusion

    DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE)

    Category Points Description

    Introduction 10 The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief
    summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose
    statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).

    PICOT
    Question

    10 State the quantitative PICOT question in a clear and concise sentence.

    References 20 Correct APA citation for each article.

    Summary
    (purpose)

    10 Describe the purpose of the article in dimple words

    Summary
    (Research
    question)

    10 Describe the research question if applied

    Summary
    (Methodology)

    10 Briefly describe the scientific method use in each article

    2

    Florida National University

    GRADING RUBRIC: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE) COMPONENT

    Summary
    (Results)

    10 Summarize the results for each article

    Summary
    (conclusion)

    10 Summarize the conclusion for each article

    APA
    formatting,
    scholarly
    writing

    10 Follow APA formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without
    grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc.

    Total 100 A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements.

    Assignment
    Criteria

    A
    Outstanding or
    highest level of

    performance

    B
    Very good or high

    level of
    performance

    C
    Competent or

    saMsfactory level
    of performance

    F
    Poor or failing or

    unsaMsfactory
    level of

    performance

    Introduction
    10 points

    Introduction is clearly
    conveyed and
    summarizes the
    primary intent of the
    paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    9-10 points

    Introduction is
    conveyed and
    outlines the primary
    intent of the paper. A
    formal purpose
    statement is
    included.

    8 points

    Introduction includes
    the primary intent of
    the paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    7 points

    Introduction is
    vague and/or not
    included. The
    primary intent of
    the paper is not
    conveyed. There is
    no purpose
    statement
    included; purpose
    of the paper is
    unclear.

    0-6 points
    P I C O T
    Question

    10 points

    Correctly and
    concisely states a
    quantitative PICOT
    question in one-
    sentence.

    9-10 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    fails to be concise.

    8 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    may have one or two
    elements incorrect.

    7 points

    Fails to state a
    quantitative PICOT
    question and/or
    may have three or
    more elements
    incorrect.

    0–5 points

    A r t i c l e
    references
    20 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format

    9-10 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with 2 to three errors
    in the format

    8-6 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with more than three
    errors in the format

    5 -3points

    Provide the
    reference but not
    in APA format

    0–3 points

    3

    Florida National University

    S u m m a r y
    (purpose)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally describes
    the purpose of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    purpose of some
    articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    purpose of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    ( R e s e a r c h
    question)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    research question of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the research
    question of each
    article
    .

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    research question of
    some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    research question
    of the articles

    0–2 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Methodology
    )

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    scientific method of
    each article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the scientific method
    of each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    scientific method of
    some articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    scientific method
    of the articles

    0–6 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Results)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the results of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the results of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the results
    of some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    results of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    (conclusion)

    .
    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    conclusion of each
    article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the conclusion of
    each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    conclusion of some
    articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    conclusion of the
    articles

    0-6 points

    A P A
    f o r m a t t i n g ,
    s c h o l a r l y
    writing
    10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with no
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Follows
    the rules of APA
    formatting.

    9-10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with minimal
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors.
    Follows the rules of
    APA formatting.

    8 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with several
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Breaks
    minor rules of APA
    formatting.

    7 points

    Does not write in a
    scholarly manner.
    Commits many
    errors in grammar,
    spelling, and
    syntax. Does not
    follow rules for APA
    formatting.

    0–6 points

    Total Points Possible = 150 points

    4

    Florida National University

    5

    – Purpose
    – General directions
    – Annotated bibliography
    – Directions and Grading Criteria: PICOT (written/narrative)
    – Grading Rubric: PICOT (written/narrative) Component

    **## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1

    2

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Annotated bibliography

    Introduction

    PICOT question:

    Annotated Bibliography

    1. Ann, M. H., Davis, A., & Glowatz, T. (2015). Development of a diabetes learning needs assessment tool to promote an individualized predischarge patient education plan. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11), 484-486. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-12

    The purpose of this artic le is to motivate nurses’ staff to empower patient to improve their understanding of their diabetes management. The article emphasizes the importance of the knowledge and successful glycemic control in diabetic patients. Therefore, Authors promote the necessity of implement a pre-discharge patient education plan to identify and address the knowledge and skill needed for diabetic patients after discharge. The pre-discharge need assessment consist in several questions that the nurse can ask to patient such us: What medication do you take? Do you know how to administer correctly those medications? Are you in insulin? Do you how to how to drawing it up and injecting it? Do you know what A1C is? Etc. The experiment was done to 44 diabetes patients. The need assessment was used in the admission and in discharge day. Nurses used the data collected to select appropriate learning materials and used them to reinforce the patients’ knowledge. As a result, the diabetic education increased in from 36% to 63% in five months. The documentation of diabetes education also increased because nurses understood the importance of the education in diabetic patients.

    2. Blackman, N. (2008). The development of an assessment tool for the bereavement needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 165-170. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=33863849&site=ehost-live

    The aim of this article is the development of a bereavement needs assessment tool to assess the need for crisis intervention for people with learning disabilities after a family death. With the assessment tools, health professionals can make a comprehensive assessment at the bereavement time to discover the problem and a plan can be put it in action. The tool was developed with the recompilation of several collected experience over the years of supporting grieving people with learning disabilities. The assessment tool has ten questions with sub- questions. The main points of the assessment are the practical issues, social issues, and emotional issues. The assessment tool has been tried out in three community teams and their results are being used to redefine the tool. The author will incorporate findings from research results to the assessment tool to refine the bereavement assessment. The used of the bereavement assessment toll will promote discussion and reflection among health care providers about losses in people with learning disability.

    3. Ewing, G., & Grande, G. (2013). Development of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 244-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216312440607

    The authors of this article recognized the need to assess and support the care givers that are providing end- of – life care to help them in their caring role. The purpose of this article is to collect care givers’ perception of key aspects of end of life care at home and to create a need assessment tool that can be used every day. A qualitative research method was done. Seventy five adult care givers for hospice patients we interviewed in the United Kingdom. They were divided in nine focus groups. Twenty two participants had private interviews no more than ten minutes in duration. All participants sing their informed consent before the experiment started. The assessment tool used evaluated 14 domains of support needs within physical, practical, social, financial, physiological, and spiritual needs that the care givers may have. The experimental study identified two brad groups of support that the care givers need. The first one was to enable them to care for their relatives and the second one to have more support for them. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool that was used in this research is an evidence based toll to measure the care givers support needs.

    4. Jenkins, J. O. (2010). A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognizing the learning needs of students. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(5), 565-576.Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=53155623&site=ehost-live

    The purpose of this article is to create a multi-faceted formative assessment that enabled student to be more engage in the assessment process. The assessment will better meet the students’ learning and assessment needs. The approaches in this article put the students in the center of the learning experience to improve students understanding the assessment. The multifaceted formative assessment had six initiatives: (1) The creation of subject specific reader that present more clearly the purpose of the assessment, (2) The assessment was refocused depend on the hours involved and not in the number of words that it has, (3) The amount of assignment was reduced, (4) The assessment had detailed guidance notes to help creating an effective self-study environment, (4) an assignment tutorial was created to facilitate discussion of the assignment to improve learning, and (6) an E-learning environment was introduced to enhance the assignment submissions and comments that will help in the assessment’s formative process. The results of the assessment were done by reading and analyzing the students’ feedback and perceptions of the assessment process. The results of this study indicate that the development of a module reader was useful for the students to be engaged with the subject being studied. It also shown that the assignment tutorial and guidance note helped them to be more engage with the assessment. Therefore, the author of this article recommends that other subjects use the readers, assignment –based tutorials and the guidance note to help the student with their learning process

    5. Kamaraj, D. C., Dicianno, B. E., & Cooper, R. A. (2014). A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. BioMed Research International, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541614

    The development of evidence based training protocol for electric powered wheelchair users such us disability persons has been a challenge because of a lack of standardized assessment toll. The purpose of this article is to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool (PMST) and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment (PMCDA). The research method was a qualitative participatory research. The research was done an approved by the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional. Twenty one participants were agreed to participate in the surveys and in the focus groups phases of the research. In the process, there were two surveys to create a list of items that will be including in the PMST and in the PMCDA. The participants rank, in the surveys, each of the screening tests in order of importance. After the survey was done, he participant were invited to participate in a focus group in which they discuss two sections the screen tool and the assessment tool. The results of this research realized tree standards that need to be fallow in the creation of the assessments. First, the goal of the PMCDA should toward improving mobility and independence of individual with disability rather than improve the access to the wheel chair. Second, the goal should be measurable so can identify progress with training. Third, the measurement should be able to recognized areas in which trainings should improve. Because this research was done with a small sample group, authors subject that further testing is needed to evaluate the effectivity of administrating these tools in clinical environment

    6. Macan, T., Konczak, L., & Breaugh, J. (2013). At your service: Blending science and practice to develop a customer service assessment tool. Applied H.R.M.Research, 13(1), 24-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448424808?accountid=458

    This article describes specific strategies and factors that can be utilized to achieve the high quality customer services oriented in an organization. This article explains a detail a project that involves the development of a customer service oriented paper and pencil assessment. The purpose of this article was to share different approaches to be considered in order to achieve high quality services. The article included five practical challenges that the organizations can face in this project. Those challenges explain were (1) Cost effectiveness and administrative efficiency,(2) Get the attention to the stakeholders, (3)Diversity of the applicants, (4) Balance statistic and practical significance, and (5) Gather multiple forms of validity evidence. The authors created an assessment tools taking into consideration those five challenge. They created an assessment tool to measure employee performance for part time positions. The assessment tool has 27 items that can be done in ten minutes and it is ease to score by hand. The assessment tool was made by taking into consideration age and race diversity of the applicants. The assessment is ease to read with the fifth grade reading level. The authors highlight the necessity of doing more researchers to provide more evidence for using the different approaches used in the study to have better strategies in implementing an innovative and scientific assessment measures.

    **ANETRESEARCHW3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anetresearchw3-docx)

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Climate change

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**I have posted the topic for the final paper along with the references needed for the paper. The final paper should be**_ approximately 6 double-spaced pages length of written text minimum with an accompanying paper outline. The paper will follow the APA style and will be a minimum of 12 double-sp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**I have posted the topic for the final paper along with the references needed for the paper. The final paper should be**_ approximately 6 double-spaced pages length of written text minimum with an accompanying paper outline. The paper will follow the APA style and will be a minimum of 12 double-spaced pages in length. NO COVER SHEETS/TITLE PAGES!

    An annotated bibliography is a bibliography (works cited) with an additional description (i.e., annotation) of each source that includes a summary, assessment, and reflection of the source. You must choose a minimum of eight (8) sources outside of course materials (course materials can be used as well).  NO COVER SHEETS/TITLE PAGES!

    Here are some online materials to help you construct and format an annotated bibliography:

    [https://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/cite-write/citation-style-guides/annotated-bibliography](https://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/cite-write/citation-style-guides/annotated-bibliography)

    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html)

    [https://guides.lib.calpoly.edu/citationhelp/annotatedbibliography](https://guides.lib.calpoly.edu/citationhelp/annotatedbibliography)

    – [\
    \
    Topicselection2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topicselection2-docx-10605113 "Topicselection2.docx")

  • [Solved] YAD-ASSIGMMENT 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    NOTE THE DOCUMETS ATTACHED DUE DATE 10/03/2026 **files (3)** – ## PICOT2.pdf – ## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx – YADIANARESEARCHA.W3.docx **## PICOT2.pdf** Florida National University PICOT / Research Assignment PICOT Question In adult hospitalized patients receiving medications (P), does i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    NOTE THE DOCUMETS ATTACHED

    DUE DATE 10/03/2026

    **files (3)**

    – ## PICOT2.pdf

    – ## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx

    – YADIANARESEARCHA.W3.docx

    **## PICOT2.pdf**

    Florida National University

    PICOT / Research Assignment

    PICOT Question

    In adult hospitalized patients receiving medications
    (P), does implementation of an
    optimized EHR-based medication clinical decision
    support alert system (I), compared with
    existing standard medication-related EHR alerts (C),
    reduce medication errors (O) over a
    12-week implementation period (T)?

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10 % OF PLAGIO OR AI
    TEXT

    NEED TO STRICTLY FOLLOW REQUIREMENT ,
    RUBRIC AND TEMPLATE OF EXAMPLE PROVIDED
    PLEASE

    PART 1 ATTACHED TO GUIDE AS WELL

    PURPOSE
    The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your
    PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

    GENERAL DIRECTIONS
    1. As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles.

    On finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the
    conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

    1

    Florida National University
    2. Locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. Write an annotation for

    each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA
    citation for each article.

    3. Refer to the Annotated Bibliographies sample located in the assignment tab for additional
    guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    1. Title Page

    2. Introduction with the PICOT question

    3. Annotated Bibliography 6 articles that support you’re your PICOT

    a. Article reference in APA format

    b. Summary of each article

    i. Purpose

    ii. Research question

    iii. Methodology

    iv. Results

    v. Conclusion

    DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE)

    Category Points Description

    Introduction 10 The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief
    summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose
    statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).

    PICOT
    Question

    10 State the quantitative PICOT question in a clear and concise sentence.

    References 20 Correct APA citation for each article.

    Summary
    (purpose)

    10 Describe the purpose of the article in dimple words

    Summary
    (Research
    question)

    10 Describe the research question if applied

    Summary
    (Methodology)

    10 Briefly describe the scientific method use in each article

    2

    Florida National University

    GRADING RUBRIC: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE) COMPONENT

    Summary
    (Results)

    10 Summarize the results for each article

    Summary
    (conclusion)

    10 Summarize the conclusion for each article

    APA
    formatting,
    scholarly
    writing

    10 Follow APA formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without
    grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc.

    Total 100 A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements.

    Assignment
    Criteria

    A
    Outstanding or
    highest level of

    performance

    B
    Very good or high

    level of
    performance

    C
    Competent or

    saMsfactory level
    of performance

    F
    Poor or failing or

    unsaMsfactory
    level of

    performance

    Introduction
    10 points

    Introduction is clearly
    conveyed and
    summarizes the
    primary intent of the
    paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    9-10 points

    Introduction is
    conveyed and
    outlines the primary
    intent of the paper. A
    formal purpose
    statement is
    included.

    8 points

    Introduction includes
    the primary intent of
    the paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    7 points

    Introduction is
    vague and/or not
    included. The
    primary intent of
    the paper is not
    conveyed. There is
    no purpose
    statement
    included; purpose
    of the paper is
    unclear.

    0-6 points
    P I C O T
    Question

    10 points

    Correctly and
    concisely states a
    quantitative PICOT
    question in one-
    sentence.

    9-10 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    fails to be concise.

    8 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    may have one or two
    elements incorrect.

    7 points

    Fails to state a
    quantitative PICOT
    question and/or
    may have three or
    more elements
    incorrect.

    0–5 points

    A r t i c l e
    references
    20 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format

    9-10 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with 2 to three errors
    in the format

    8-6 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with more than three
    errors in the format

    5 -3points

    Provide the
    reference but not
    in APA format

    0–3 points

    3

    Florida National University

    S u m m a r y
    (purpose)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally describes
    the purpose of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    purpose of some
    articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    purpose of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    ( R e s e a r c h
    question)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    research question of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the research
    question of each
    article
    .

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    research question of
    some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    research question
    of the articles

    0–2 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Methodology
    )

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    scientific method of
    each article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the scientific method
    of each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    scientific method of
    some articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    scientific method
    of the articles

    0–6 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Results)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the results of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the results of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the results
    of some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    results of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    (conclusion)

    .
    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    conclusion of each
    article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the conclusion of
    each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    conclusion of some
    articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    conclusion of the
    articles

    0-6 points

    A P A
    f o r m a t t i n g ,
    s c h o l a r l y
    writing
    10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with no
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Follows
    the rules of APA
    formatting.

    9-10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with minimal
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors.
    Follows the rules of
    APA formatting.

    8 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with several
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Breaks
    minor rules of APA
    formatting.

    7 points

    Does not write in a
    scholarly manner.
    Commits many
    errors in grammar,
    spelling, and
    syntax. Does not
    follow rules for APA
    formatting.

    0–6 points

    Total Points Possible = 150 points

    4

    Florida National University

    5

    – Purpose
    – General directions
    – Annotated bibliography
    – Directions and Grading Criteria: PICOT (written/narrative)
    – Grading Rubric: PICOT (written/narrative) Component

    **## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1

    2

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Annotated bibliography

    Introduction

    PICOT question:

    Annotated Bibliography

    1. Ann, M. H., Davis, A., & Glowatz, T. (2015). Development of a diabetes learning needs assessment tool to promote an individualized predischarge patient education plan. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11), 484-486. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-12

    The purpose of this artic le is to motivate nurses’ staff to empower patient to improve their understanding of their diabetes management. The article emphasizes the importance of the knowledge and successful glycemic control in diabetic patients. Therefore, Authors promote the necessity of implement a pre-discharge patient education plan to identify and address the knowledge and skill needed for diabetic patients after discharge. The pre-discharge need assessment consist in several questions that the nurse can ask to patient such us: What medication do you take? Do you know how to administer correctly those medications? Are you in insulin? Do you how to how to drawing it up and injecting it? Do you know what A1C is? Etc. The experiment was done to 44 diabetes patients. The need assessment was used in the admission and in discharge day. Nurses used the data collected to select appropriate learning materials and used them to reinforce the patients’ knowledge. As a result, the diabetic education increased in from 36% to 63% in five months. The documentation of diabetes education also increased because nurses understood the importance of the education in diabetic patients.

    2. Blackman, N. (2008). The development of an assessment tool for the bereavement needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 165-170. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=33863849&site=ehost-live

    The aim of this article is the development of a bereavement needs assessment tool to assess the need for crisis intervention for people with learning disabilities after a family death. With the assessment tools, health professionals can make a comprehensive assessment at the bereavement time to discover the problem and a plan can be put it in action. The tool was developed with the recompilation of several collected experience over the years of supporting grieving people with learning disabilities. The assessment tool has ten questions with sub- questions. The main points of the assessment are the practical issues, social issues, and emotional issues. The assessment tool has been tried out in three community teams and their results are being used to redefine the tool. The author will incorporate findings from research results to the assessment tool to refine the bereavement assessment. The used of the bereavement assessment toll will promote discussion and reflection among health care providers about losses in people with learning disability.

    3. Ewing, G., & Grande, G. (2013). Development of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 244-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216312440607

    The authors of this article recognized the need to assess and support the care givers that are providing end- of – life care to help them in their caring role. The purpose of this article is to collect care givers’ perception of key aspects of end of life care at home and to create a need assessment tool that can be used every day. A qualitative research method was done. Seventy five adult care givers for hospice patients we interviewed in the United Kingdom. They were divided in nine focus groups. Twenty two participants had private interviews no more than ten minutes in duration. All participants sing their informed consent before the experiment started. The assessment tool used evaluated 14 domains of support needs within physical, practical, social, financial, physiological, and spiritual needs that the care givers may have. The experimental study identified two brad groups of support that the care givers need. The first one was to enable them to care for their relatives and the second one to have more support for them. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool that was used in this research is an evidence based toll to measure the care givers support needs.

    4. Jenkins, J. O. (2010). A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognizing the learning needs of students. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(5), 565-576.Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=53155623&site=ehost-live

    The purpose of this article is to create a multi-faceted formative assessment that enabled student to be more engage in the assessment process. The assessment will better meet the students’ learning and assessment needs. The approaches in this article put the students in the center of the learning experience to improve students understanding the assessment. The multifaceted formative assessment had six initiatives: (1) The creation of subject specific reader that present more clearly the purpose of the assessment, (2) The assessment was refocused depend on the hours involved and not in the number of words that it has, (3) The amount of assignment was reduced, (4) The assessment had detailed guidance notes to help creating an effective self-study environment, (4) an assignment tutorial was created to facilitate discussion of the assignment to improve learning, and (6) an E-learning environment was introduced to enhance the assignment submissions and comments that will help in the assessment’s formative process. The results of the assessment were done by reading and analyzing the students’ feedback and perceptions of the assessment process. The results of this study indicate that the development of a module reader was useful for the students to be engaged with the subject being studied. It also shown that the assignment tutorial and guidance note helped them to be more engage with the assessment. Therefore, the author of this article recommends that other subjects use the readers, assignment –based tutorials and the guidance note to help the student with their learning process

    5. Kamaraj, D. C., Dicianno, B. E., & Cooper, R. A. (2014). A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. BioMed Research International, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541614

    The development of evidence based training protocol for electric powered wheelchair users such us disability persons has been a challenge because of a lack of standardized assessment toll. The purpose of this article is to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool (PMST) and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment (PMCDA). The research method was a qualitative participatory research. The research was done an approved by the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional. Twenty one participants were agreed to participate in the surveys and in the focus groups phases of the research. In the process, there were two surveys to create a list of items that will be including in the PMST and in the PMCDA. The participants rank, in the surveys, each of the screening tests in order of importance. After the survey was done, he participant were invited to participate in a focus group in which they discuss two sections the screen tool and the assessment tool. The results of this research realized tree standards that need to be fallow in the creation of the assessments. First, the goal of the PMCDA should toward improving mobility and independence of individual with disability rather than improve the access to the wheel chair. Second, the goal should be measurable so can identify progress with training. Third, the measurement should be able to recognized areas in which trainings should improve. Because this research was done with a small sample group, authors subject that further testing is needed to evaluate the effectivity of administrating these tools in clinical environment

    6. Macan, T., Konczak, L., & Breaugh, J. (2013). At your service: Blending science and practice to develop a customer service assessment tool. Applied H.R.M.Research, 13(1), 24-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448424808?accountid=458

    This article describes specific strategies and factors that can be utilized to achieve the high quality customer services oriented in an organization. This article explains a detail a project that involves the development of a customer service oriented paper and pencil assessment. The purpose of this article was to share different approaches to be considered in order to achieve high quality services. The article included five practical challenges that the organizations can face in this project. Those challenges explain were (1) Cost effectiveness and administrative efficiency,(2) Get the attention to the stakeholders, (3)Diversity of the applicants, (4) Balance statistic and practical significance, and (5) Gather multiple forms of validity evidence. The authors created an assessment tools taking into consideration those five challenge. They created an assessment tool to measure employee performance for part time positions. The assessment tool has 27 items that can be done in ten minutes and it is ease to score by hand. The assessment tool was made by taking into consideration age and race diversity of the applicants. The assessment is ease to read with the fifth grade reading level. The authors highlight the necessity of doing more researchers to provide more evidence for using the different approaches used in the study to have better strategies in implementing an innovative and scientific assessment measures.

    **YADIANARESEARCHA.W3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/yadianaresearcha-w3-docx)

    **YADIANARESEARCHA.W3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/yadianaresearcha-w3-docx)

    **## PICOT2.pdf**

    Florida National University

    PICOT / Research Assignment

    PICOT Question

    In adult hospitalized patients receiving medications
    (P), does implementation of an
    optimized EHR-based medication clinical decision
    support alert system (I), compared with
    existing standard medication-related EHR alerts (C),
    reduce medication errors (O) over a
    12-week implementation period (T)?

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10 % OF PLAGIO OR AI
    TEXT

    NEED TO STRICTLY FOLLOW REQUIREMENT ,
    RUBRIC AND TEMPLATE OF EXAMPLE PROVIDED
    PLEASE

    PART 1 ATTACHED TO GUIDE AS WELL

    PURPOSE
    The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your
    PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

    GENERAL DIRECTIONS
    1. As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles.

    On finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the
    conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

    1

    Florida National University
    2. Locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. Write an annotation for

    each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA
    citation for each article.

    3. Refer to the Annotated Bibliographies sample located in the assignment tab for additional
    guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    1. Title Page

    2. Introduction with the PICOT question

    3. Annotated Bibliography 6 articles that support you’re your PICOT

    a. Article reference in APA format

    b. Summary of each article

    i. Purpose

    ii. Research question

    iii. Methodology

    iv. Results

    v. Conclusion

    DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE)

    Category Points Description

    Introduction 10 The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief
    summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose
    statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).

    PICOT
    Question

    10 State the quantitative PICOT question in a clear and concise sentence.

    References 20 Correct APA citation for each article.

    Summary
    (purpose)

    10 Describe the purpose of the article in dimple words

    Summary
    (Research
    question)

    10 Describe the research question if applied

    Summary
    (Methodology)

    10 Briefly describe the scientific method use in each article

    2

    Florida National University

    GRADING RUBRIC: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE) COMPONENT

    Summary
    (Results)

    10 Summarize the results for each article

    Summary
    (conclusion)

    10 Summarize the conclusion for each article

    APA
    formatting,
    scholarly
    writing

    10 Follow APA formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without
    grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc.

    Total 100 A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements.

    Assignment
    Criteria

    A
    Outstanding or
    highest level of

    performance

    B
    Very good or high

    level of
    performance

    C
    Competent or

    saMsfactory level
    of performance

    F
    Poor or failing or

    unsaMsfactory
    level of

    performance

    Introduction
    10 points

    Introduction is clearly
    conveyed and
    summarizes the
    primary intent of the
    paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    9-10 points

    Introduction is
    conveyed and
    outlines the primary
    intent of the paper. A
    formal purpose
    statement is
    included.

    8 points

    Introduction includes
    the primary intent of
    the paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    7 points

    Introduction is
    vague and/or not
    included. The
    primary intent of
    the paper is not
    conveyed. There is
    no purpose
    statement
    included; purpose
    of the paper is
    unclear.

    0-6 points
    P I C O T
    Question

    10 points

    Correctly and
    concisely states a
    quantitative PICOT
    question in one-
    sentence.

    9-10 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    fails to be concise.

    8 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    may have one or two
    elements incorrect.

    7 points

    Fails to state a
    quantitative PICOT
    question and/or
    may have three or
    more elements
    incorrect.

    0–5 points

    A r t i c l e
    references
    20 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format

    9-10 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with 2 to three errors
    in the format

    8-6 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with more than three
    errors in the format

    5 -3points

    Provide the
    reference but not
    in APA format

    0–3 points

    3

    Florida National University

    S u m m a r y
    (purpose)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally describes
    the purpose of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    purpose of some
    articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    purpose of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    ( R e s e a r c h
    question)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    research question of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the research
    question of each
    article
    .

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    research question of
    some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    research question
    of the articles

    0–2 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Methodology
    )

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    scientific method of
    each article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the scientific method
    of each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    scientific method of
    some articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    scientific method
    of the articles

    0–6 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Results)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the results of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the results of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the results
    of some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    results of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    (conclusion)

    .
    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    conclusion of each
    article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the conclusion of
    each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    conclusion of some
    articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    conclusion of the
    articles

    0-6 points

    A P A
    f o r m a t t i n g ,
    s c h o l a r l y
    writing
    10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with no
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Follows
    the rules of APA
    formatting.

    9-10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with minimal
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors.
    Follows the rules of
    APA formatting.

    8 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with several
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Breaks
    minor rules of APA
    formatting.

    7 points

    Does not write in a
    scholarly manner.
    Commits many
    errors in grammar,
    spelling, and
    syntax. Does not
    follow rules for APA
    formatting.

    0–6 points

    Total Points Possible = 150 points

    4

    Florida National University

    5

    – Purpose
    – General directions
    – Annotated bibliography
    – Directions and Grading Criteria: PICOT (written/narrative)
    – Grading Rubric: PICOT (written/narrative) Component

    **## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1

    2

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Annotated bibliography

    Introduction

    PICOT question:

    Annotated Bibliography

    1. Ann, M. H., Davis, A., & Glowatz, T. (2015). Development of a diabetes learning needs assessment tool to promote an individualized predischarge patient education plan. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11), 484-486. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-12

    The purpose of this artic le is to motivate nurses’ staff to empower patient to improve their understanding of their diabetes management. The article emphasizes the importance of the knowledge and successful glycemic control in diabetic patients. Therefore, Authors promote the necessity of implement a pre-discharge patient education plan to identify and address the knowledge and skill needed for diabetic patients after discharge. The pre-discharge need assessment consist in several questions that the nurse can ask to patient such us: What medication do you take? Do you know how to administer correctly those medications? Are you in insulin? Do you how to how to drawing it up and injecting it? Do you know what A1C is? Etc. The experiment was done to 44 diabetes patients. The need assessment was used in the admission and in discharge day. Nurses used the data collected to select appropriate learning materials and used them to reinforce the patients’ knowledge. As a result, the diabetic education increased in from 36% to 63% in five months. The documentation of diabetes education also increased because nurses understood the importance of the education in diabetic patients.

    2. Blackman, N. (2008). The development of an assessment tool for the bereavement needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 165-170. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=33863849&site=ehost-live

    The aim of this article is the development of a bereavement needs assessment tool to assess the need for crisis intervention for people with learning disabilities after a family death. With the assessment tools, health professionals can make a comprehensive assessment at the bereavement time to discover the problem and a plan can be put it in action. The tool was developed with the recompilation of several collected experience over the years of supporting grieving people with learning disabilities. The assessment tool has ten questions with sub- questions. The main points of the assessment are the practical issues, social issues, and emotional issues. The assessment tool has been tried out in three community teams and their results are being used to redefine the tool. The author will incorporate findings from research results to the assessment tool to refine the bereavement assessment. The used of the bereavement assessment toll will promote discussion and reflection among health care providers about losses in people with learning disability.

    3. Ewing, G., & Grande, G. (2013). Development of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 244-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216312440607

    The authors of this article recognized the need to assess and support the care givers that are providing end- of – life care to help them in their caring role. The purpose of this article is to collect care givers’ perception of key aspects of end of life care at home and to create a need assessment tool that can be used every day. A qualitative research method was done. Seventy five adult care givers for hospice patients we interviewed in the United Kingdom. They were divided in nine focus groups. Twenty two participants had private interviews no more than ten minutes in duration. All participants sing their informed consent before the experiment started. The assessment tool used evaluated 14 domains of support needs within physical, practical, social, financial, physiological, and spiritual needs that the care givers may have. The experimental study identified two brad groups of support that the care givers need. The first one was to enable them to care for their relatives and the second one to have more support for them. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool that was used in this research is an evidence based toll to measure the care givers support needs.

    4. Jenkins, J. O. (2010). A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognizing the learning needs of students. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(5), 565-576.Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=53155623&site=ehost-live

    The purpose of this article is to create a multi-faceted formative assessment that enabled student to be more engage in the assessment process. The assessment will better meet the students’ learning and assessment needs. The approaches in this article put the students in the center of the learning experience to improve students understanding the assessment. The multifaceted formative assessment had six initiatives: (1) The creation of subject specific reader that present more clearly the purpose of the assessment, (2) The assessment was refocused depend on the hours involved and not in the number of words that it has, (3) The amount of assignment was reduced, (4) The assessment had detailed guidance notes to help creating an effective self-study environment, (4) an assignment tutorial was created to facilitate discussion of the assignment to improve learning, and (6) an E-learning environment was introduced to enhance the assignment submissions and comments that will help in the assessment’s formative process. The results of the assessment were done by reading and analyzing the students’ feedback and perceptions of the assessment process. The results of this study indicate that the development of a module reader was useful for the students to be engaged with the subject being studied. It also shown that the assignment tutorial and guidance note helped them to be more engage with the assessment. Therefore, the author of this article recommends that other subjects use the readers, assignment –based tutorials and the guidance note to help the student with their learning process

    5. Kamaraj, D. C., Dicianno, B. E., & Cooper, R. A. (2014). A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. BioMed Research International, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541614

    The development of evidence based training protocol for electric powered wheelchair users such us disability persons has been a challenge because of a lack of standardized assessment toll. The purpose of this article is to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool (PMST) and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment (PMCDA). The research method was a qualitative participatory research. The research was done an approved by the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional. Twenty one participants were agreed to participate in the surveys and in the focus groups phases of the research. In the process, there were two surveys to create a list of items that will be including in the PMST and in the PMCDA. The participants rank, in the surveys, each of the screening tests in order of importance. After the survey was done, he participant were invited to participate in a focus group in which they discuss two sections the screen tool and the assessment tool. The results of this research realized tree standards that need to be fallow in the creation of the assessments. First, the goal of the PMCDA should toward improving mobility and independence of individual with disability rather than improve the access to the wheel chair. Second, the goal should be measurable so can identify progress with training. Third, the measurement should be able to recognized areas in which trainings should improve. Because this research was done with a small sample group, authors subject that further testing is needed to evaluate the effectivity of administrating these tools in clinical environment

    6. Macan, T., Konczak, L., & Breaugh, J. (2013). At your service: Blending science and practice to develop a customer service assessment tool. Applied H.R.M.Research, 13(1), 24-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448424808?accountid=458

    This article describes specific strategies and factors that can be utilized to achieve the high quality customer services oriented in an organization. This article explains a detail a project that involves the development of a customer service oriented paper and pencil assessment. The purpose of this article was to share different approaches to be considered in order to achieve high quality services. The article included five practical challenges that the organizations can face in this project. Those challenges explain were (1) Cost effectiveness and administrative efficiency,(2) Get the attention to the stakeholders, (3)Diversity of the applicants, (4) Balance statistic and practical significance, and (5) Gather multiple forms of validity evidence. The authors created an assessment tools taking into consideration those five challenge. They created an assessment tool to measure employee performance for part time positions. The assessment tool has 27 items that can be done in ten minutes and it is ease to score by hand. The assessment tool was made by taking into consideration age and race diversity of the applicants. The assessment is ease to read with the fifth grade reading level. The authors highlight the necessity of doing more researchers to provide more evidence for using the different approaches used in the study to have better strategies in implementing an innovative and scientific assessment measures.

    **YADIANARESEARCHA.W3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/yadianaresearcha-w3-docx)

    **## PICOT2.pdf**

    Florida National University

    PICOT / Research Assignment

    PICOT Question

    In adult hospitalized patients receiving medications
    (P), does implementation of an
    optimized EHR-based medication clinical decision
    support alert system (I), compared with
    existing standard medication-related EHR alerts (C),
    reduce medication errors (O) over a
    12-week implementation period (T)?

    CANT HAVE MORE THAN 10 % OF PLAGIO OR AI
    TEXT

    NEED TO STRICTLY FOLLOW REQUIREMENT ,
    RUBRIC AND TEMPLATE OF EXAMPLE PROVIDED
    PLEASE

    PART 1 ATTACHED TO GUIDE AS WELL

    PURPOSE
    The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your
    PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

    GENERAL DIRECTIONS
    1. As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles.

    On finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the
    conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

    1

    Florida National University
    2. Locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. Write an annotation for

    each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA
    citation for each article.

    3. Refer to the Annotated Bibliographies sample located in the assignment tab for additional
    guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
    1. Title Page

    2. Introduction with the PICOT question

    3. Annotated Bibliography 6 articles that support you’re your PICOT

    a. Article reference in APA format

    b. Summary of each article

    i. Purpose

    ii. Research question

    iii. Methodology

    iv. Results

    v. Conclusion

    DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE)

    Category Points Description

    Introduction 10 The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of a brief
    summary of the intent of your paper. It must also provide a formal purpose
    statement to set your paper up for your reader(s).

    PICOT
    Question

    10 State the quantitative PICOT question in a clear and concise sentence.

    References 20 Correct APA citation for each article.

    Summary
    (purpose)

    10 Describe the purpose of the article in dimple words

    Summary
    (Research
    question)

    10 Describe the research question if applied

    Summary
    (Methodology)

    10 Briefly describe the scientific method use in each article

    2

    Florida National University

    GRADING RUBRIC: PICOT (WRITTEN/NARRATIVE) COMPONENT

    Summary
    (Results)

    10 Summarize the results for each article

    Summary
    (conclusion)

    10 Summarize the conclusion for each article

    APA
    formatting,
    scholarly
    writing

    10 Follow APA formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without
    grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc.

    Total 100 A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements.

    Assignment
    Criteria

    A
    Outstanding or
    highest level of

    performance

    B
    Very good or high

    level of
    performance

    C
    Competent or

    saMsfactory level
    of performance

    F
    Poor or failing or

    unsaMsfactory
    level of

    performance

    Introduction
    10 points

    Introduction is clearly
    conveyed and
    summarizes the
    primary intent of the
    paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    9-10 points

    Introduction is
    conveyed and
    outlines the primary
    intent of the paper. A
    formal purpose
    statement is
    included.

    8 points

    Introduction includes
    the primary intent of
    the paper. A formal
    purpose statement is
    included.

    7 points

    Introduction is
    vague and/or not
    included. The
    primary intent of
    the paper is not
    conveyed. There is
    no purpose
    statement
    included; purpose
    of the paper is
    unclear.

    0-6 points
    P I C O T
    Question

    10 points

    Correctly and
    concisely states a
    quantitative PICOT
    question in one-
    sentence.

    9-10 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    fails to be concise.

    8 points

    States a quantitative
    PICOT question, but
    may have one or two
    elements incorrect.

    7 points

    Fails to state a
    quantitative PICOT
    question and/or
    may have three or
    more elements
    incorrect.

    0–5 points

    A r t i c l e
    references
    20 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format

    9-10 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with 2 to three errors
    in the format

    8-6 points

    Provides the
    reference for each
    article in APA format
    with more than three
    errors in the format

    5 -3points

    Provide the
    reference but not
    in APA format

    0–3 points

    3

    Florida National University

    S u m m a r y
    (purpose)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally describes
    the purpose of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    purpose of some
    articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    purpose of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    ( R e s e a r c h
    question)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    research question of
    the purpose of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the research
    question of each
    article
    .

    6-7 points

    Identifies the
    research question of
    some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    research question
    of the articles

    0–2 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Methodology
    )

    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    scientific method of
    each article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the scientific method
    of each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    scientific method of
    some articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    scientific method
    of the articles

    0–6 points

    S u m m a r y
    (Results)

    Provides a detailed
    description of the of
    the results of each
    article

    8-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the results of each
    article

    6-7 points

    Identifies the results
    of some articles

    4-5 points

    Fails to identify the
    results of the
    articles

    0–3 points

    S u m m a r y
    (conclusion)

    .
    Provides a detailed
    description of the
    conclusion of each
    article

    9-10 points

    Generally, describes
    the conclusion of
    each article

    8 points

    Identifies the
    conclusion of some
    articles

    7 points

    Fails to identify the
    conclusion of the
    articles

    0-6 points

    A P A
    f o r m a t t i n g ,
    s c h o l a r l y
    writing
    10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with no
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Follows
    the rules of APA
    formatting.

    9-10 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with minimal
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors.
    Follows the rules of
    APA formatting.

    8 points

    Writes in a scholarly
    manner with several
    grammar, spelling, or
    syntax errors. Breaks
    minor rules of APA
    formatting.

    7 points

    Does not write in a
    scholarly manner.
    Commits many
    errors in grammar,
    spelling, and
    syntax. Does not
    follow rules for APA
    formatting.

    0–6 points

    Total Points Possible = 150 points

    4

    Florida National University

    5

    – Purpose
    – General directions
    – Annotated bibliography
    – Directions and Grading Criteria: PICOT (written/narrative)
    – Grading Rubric: PICOT (written/narrative) Component

    **## ExampleofanAnnotatedBibliography.docx**

    Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1

    2

    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Annotated bibliography

    Introduction

    PICOT question:

    Annotated Bibliography

    1. Ann, M. H., Davis, A., & Glowatz, T. (2015). Development of a diabetes learning needs assessment tool to promote an individualized predischarge patient education plan. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11), 484-486. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-12

    The purpose of this artic le is to motivate nurses’ staff to empower patient to improve their understanding of their diabetes management. The article emphasizes the importance of the knowledge and successful glycemic control in diabetic patients. Therefore, Authors promote the necessity of implement a pre-discharge patient education plan to identify and address the knowledge and skill needed for diabetic patients after discharge. The pre-discharge need assessment consist in several questions that the nurse can ask to patient such us: What medication do you take? Do you know how to administer correctly those medications? Are you in insulin? Do you how to how to drawing it up and injecting it? Do you know what A1C is? Etc. The experiment was done to 44 diabetes patients. The need assessment was used in the admission and in discharge day. Nurses used the data collected to select appropriate learning materials and used them to reinforce the patients’ knowledge. As a result, the diabetic education increased in from 36% to 63% in five months. The documentation of diabetes education also increased because nurses understood the importance of the education in diabetic patients.

    2. Blackman, N. (2008). The development of an assessment tool for the bereavement needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 165-170. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=33863849&site=ehost-live

    The aim of this article is the development of a bereavement needs assessment tool to assess the need for crisis intervention for people with learning disabilities after a family death. With the assessment tools, health professionals can make a comprehensive assessment at the bereavement time to discover the problem and a plan can be put it in action. The tool was developed with the recompilation of several collected experience over the years of supporting grieving people with learning disabilities. The assessment tool has ten questions with sub- questions. The main points of the assessment are the practical issues, social issues, and emotional issues. The assessment tool has been tried out in three community teams and their results are being used to redefine the tool. The author will incorporate findings from research results to the assessment tool to refine the bereavement assessment. The used of the bereavement assessment toll will promote discussion and reflection among health care providers about losses in people with learning disability.

    3. Ewing, G., & Grande, G. (2013). Development of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 244-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216312440607

    The authors of this article recognized the need to assess and support the care givers that are providing end- of – life care to help them in their caring role. The purpose of this article is to collect care givers’ perception of key aspects of end of life care at home and to create a need assessment tool that can be used every day. A qualitative research method was done. Seventy five adult care givers for hospice patients we interviewed in the United Kingdom. They were divided in nine focus groups. Twenty two participants had private interviews no more than ten minutes in duration. All participants sing their informed consent before the experiment started. The assessment tool used evaluated 14 domains of support needs within physical, practical, social, financial, physiological, and spiritual needs that the care givers may have. The experimental study identified two brad groups of support that the care givers need. The first one was to enable them to care for their relatives and the second one to have more support for them. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool that was used in this research is an evidence based toll to measure the care givers support needs.

    4. Jenkins, J. O. (2010). A multi-faceted formative assessment approach: better recognizing the learning needs of students. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(5), 565-576.Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=53155623&site=ehost-live

    The purpose of this article is to create a multi-faceted formative assessment that enabled student to be more engage in the assessment process. The assessment will better meet the students’ learning and assessment needs. The approaches in this article put the students in the center of the learning experience to improve students understanding the assessment. The multifaceted formative assessment had six initiatives: (1) The creation of subject specific reader that present more clearly the purpose of the assessment, (2) The assessment was refocused depend on the hours involved and not in the number of words that it has, (3) The amount of assignment was reduced, (4) The assessment had detailed guidance notes to help creating an effective self-study environment, (4) an assignment tutorial was created to facilitate discussion of the assignment to improve learning, and (6) an E-learning environment was introduced to enhance the assignment submissions and comments that will help in the assessment’s formative process. The results of the assessment were done by reading and analyzing the students’ feedback and perceptions of the assessment process. The results of this study indicate that the development of a module reader was useful for the students to be engaged with the subject being studied. It also shown that the assignment tutorial and guidance note helped them to be more engage with the assessment. Therefore, the author of this article recommends that other subjects use the readers, assignment –based tutorials and the guidance note to help the student with their learning process

    5. Kamaraj, D. C., Dicianno, B. E., & Cooper, R. A. (2014). A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. BioMed Research International, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541614

    The development of evidence based training protocol for electric powered wheelchair users such us disability persons has been a challenge because of a lack of standardized assessment toll. The purpose of this article is to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool (PMST) and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment (PMCDA). The research method was a qualitative participatory research. The research was done an approved by the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional. Twenty one participants were agreed to participate in the surveys and in the focus groups phases of the research. In the process, there were two surveys to create a list of items that will be including in the PMST and in the PMCDA. The participants rank, in the surveys, each of the screening tests in order of importance. After the survey was done, he participant were invited to participate in a focus group in which they discuss two sections the screen tool and the assessment tool. The results of this research realized tree standards that need to be fallow in the creation of the assessments. First, the goal of the PMCDA should toward improving mobility and independence of individual with disability rather than improve the access to the wheel chair. Second, the goal should be measurable so can identify progress with training. Third, the measurement should be able to recognized areas in which trainings should improve. Because this research was done with a small sample group, authors subject that further testing is needed to evaluate the effectivity of administrating these tools in clinical environment

    6. Macan, T., Konczak, L., & Breaugh, J. (2013). At your service: Blending science and practice to develop a customer service assessment tool. Applied H.R.M.Research, 13(1), 24-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448424808?accountid=458

    This article describes specific strategies and factors that can be utilized to achieve the high quality customer services oriented in an organization. This article explains a detail a project that involves the development of a customer service oriented paper and pencil assessment. The purpose of this article was to share different approaches to be considered in order to achieve high quality services. The article included five practical challenges that the organizations can face in this project. Those challenges explain were (1) Cost effectiveness and administrative efficiency,(2) Get the attention to the stakeholders, (3)Diversity of the applicants, (4) Balance statistic and practical significance, and (5) Gather multiple forms of validity evidence. The authors created an assessment tools taking into consideration those five challenge. They created an assessment tool to measure employee performance for part time positions. The assessment tool has 27 items that can be done in ten minutes and it is ease to score by hand. The assessment tool was made by taking into consideration age and race diversity of the applicants. The assessment is ease to read with the fifth grade reading level. The authors highlight the necessity of doing more researchers to provide more evidence for using the different approaches used in the study to have better strategies in implementing an innovative and scientific assessment measures.

    **YADIANARESEARCHA.W3.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/yadianaresearcha-w3-docx)