[Solved] APA

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– a month ago

**files (1)**

– ## Class3Self-Evaluation.docx

**## Class3Self-Evaluation.docx**

**Name:**

**Date:**

**SPED 625: Class 3 Self-Evaluation Rubric**

**Class Assigned Items. Check the box as completed.**

| | |
| — | — |
| | 1. <br>**Post:** Literature Review Rubric in the Literature Evaluation Assessment folder by Saturday posting time. |
| | 2. <br>**Post:** Your sheet of answers to the Class Activities questions by Wednesday posting time in the Assignment file for APA 7th Edition Practice |
| | 3. <br>**Post:** The completed APA 7th Edition Practice Sheet (located in Class 3 content) in D2L assignment file for APA 7th Edition Practice section by Wed. at posting time. I will post the answer key in Class 3 content at 11:59 p.m. for you to correct your own. Post any corrections under your changed citation and repost in Assignment file in APA 7th Edition Practice by Saturday posting. |
| | 4. <br>**Complete and post** the Class 3 Self-Evaluation for this week in Class 3 Self-Evaluation Assignment file by Saturday posting time. |

**Rubric**

**Content (8 points possible): Check the box for points awarded.**

| | |
| — | — |
| | **Exemplary (8 points):** Gives very specific information, addresses all assignment components, and clearly illustrates critical and reflective thinking. The response/completed work is well thought out. |
| | **Meets Expectations (6 points):** Contains specific information and addresses all assignment components. The response/completed work is relatively detailed and shows some critical and reflective thinking. It is relatively well thought out. |
| | **Developing (4 points):** Has some specific information and addresses many of the assignment components but is not detailed. The response/completed work is poorly thought out. |
| | **Poor (2 points):** Is vague and does not address all assignment components. There is no evidence of having given the assignment real thought. |
| | **Not Apparent (0 points):** No assignment submitted or submitted late. |

**Technical (2 points possible) Check the box for points awarded.**

| | |
| — | — |
| | **Exemplary (2 points):** Execution is excellent. There is no grammar or writing errors. The writing reads easily and is well organized. |
| | **Meets Expectations (1.5 points):** Well executed with few grammar or writing errors. The writing reads easily and is fairly well organized. |
| | **Developing (1 point):** Execution is poor with many grammar or writing errors. The writing is hard to read and poorly organized. |
| | **Poor (0.5 points):** Very poorly written and very difficult to read. No organization is evident; reads like a last-minute effort. |
| | **Not Apparent (0 points):** No assignment submitted or submitted late. |
| **/10** | **Total Points Awarded from Content and Technical Sections** |

**Graduate Student Comments on Week’s Work (must comment):**

**## Class3Self-Evaluation.docx**

**Name:**

**Date:**

**SPED 625: Class 3 Self-Evaluation Rubric**

**Class Assigned Items. Check the box as completed.**

| | |
| — | — |
| | 1. <br>**Post:** Literature Review Rubric in the Literature Evaluation Assessment folder by Saturday posting time. |
| | 2. <br>**Post:** Your sheet of answers to the Class Activities questions by Wednesday posting time in the Assignment file for APA 7th Edition Practice |
| | 3. <br>**Post:** The completed APA 7th Edition Practice Sheet (located in Class 3 content) in D2L assignment file for APA 7th Edition Practice section by Wed. at posting time. I will post the answer key in Class 3 content at 11:59 p.m. for you to correct your own. Post any corrections under your changed citation and repost in Assignment file in APA 7th Edition Practice by Saturday posting. |
| | 4. <br>**Complete and post** the Class 3 Self-Evaluation for this week in Class 3 Self-Evaluation Assignment file by Saturday posting time. |

**Rubric**

**Content (8 points possible): Check the box for points awarded.**

| | |
| — | — |
| | **Exemplary (8 points):** Gives very specific information, addresses all assignment components, and clearly illustrates critical and reflective thinking. The response/completed work is well thought out. |
| | **Meets Expectations (6 points):** Contains specific information and addresses all assignment components. The response/completed work is relatively detailed and shows some critical and reflective thinking. It is relatively well thought out. |
| | **Developing (4 points):** Has some specific information and addresses many of the assignment components but is not detailed. The response/completed work is poorly thought out. |
| | **Poor (2 points):** Is vague and does not address all assignment components. There is no evidence of having given the assignment real thought. |
| | **Not Apparent (0 points):** No assignment submitted or submitted late. |

**Technical (2 points possible) Check the box for points awarded.**

| | |
| — | — |
| | **Exemplary (2 points):** Execution is excellent. There is no grammar or writing errors. The writing reads easily and is well organized. |
| | **Meets Expectations (1.5 points):** Well executed with few grammar or writing errors. The writing reads easily and is fairly well organized. |
| | **Developing (1 point):** Execution is poor with many grammar or writing errors. The writing is hard to read and poorly organized. |
| | **Poor (0.5 points):** Very poorly written and very difficult to read. No organization is evident; reads like a last-minute effort. |
| | **Not Apparent (0 points):** No assignment submitted or submitted late. |
| **/10** | **Total Points Awarded from Content and Technical Sections** |

**Graduate Student Comments on Week’s Work (must comment):**