Executive Solution Overview
**Module 3 assignment: Health Campaign Efficacy** – a month ago **files (2)** – ## Module3Assignment.docx – ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx **## Module3Assignment.docx** **Module 3 assignment: Health Campaign Efficacy Essay** Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**Module 3 assignment: Health Campaign Efficacy**
– a month ago
**files (2)**
– ## Module3Assignment.docx
– ## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx
**## Module3Assignment.docx**
**Module 3 assignment: Health Campaign Efficacy Essay**
Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with
**at least four (4) sources in your essay.** The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount.
As addressed in this module, the social determinants of health have a significant impact on the health status of communities and populations. This information may inform healthcare providers on how to tailor interventions or develop campaigns to promote health and prevent disease. The purpose of this assignment is to critique the efficacy of a health campaign and/or program in a rural community and/or population.
This week’s assignment: use the following instructions
**(State of residence: NEW YORK)**
· Go to your state Public Health Department website and identify a campaign that has been implemented in a rural community and/or population. If you cannot identify a campaign via this method, please conduct a literature review and select a campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in a rural community and/or population. For example, you may identify a tobacco cessation campaign among rural Burmese community members.
· Once you have identified one campaign:
· Describe the purpose and goals of the campaign.
· Depict the rural community or population impacted by this campaign.
· Determine if a grant or other mechanism funded the implementation and evaluation of the campaign.
· Describe the activities embedded in the campaign and critique the feasibility and/or approach implemented in the campaign (Were there other variables that may have been included in the campaign?).
· Describe the outcome measures and critique if other outcome measures should have been included in the campaign. If so, what other outcomes would you have included?
· For example, determine if other dependable and/or tested instruments should have been included in this campaign.
· Describe if the campaign was successful and/or unsuccessful. If it was successful, what factors contributed to the success of the campaign? If it was unsuccessful, what factors contributed to the ineffectiveness of the campaign?
· Describe how the campaign was evaluated and critique how the evaluation was presented. Determine if other aspects of the campaign should have been evaluated and/or considered.
· Determine if a discussion on sustainability was included. If not, discuss how the campaign may be sustained.
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1.
**Review the rubric and the specifications** to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
The following specifications are required for this assignment:
·
**Length:** 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least
**FOUR (4) scholarly sources**.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from 2021**
**to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**Learning Materials**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. Read chapters 6 & 10. (48 pages)
**Additional Resources**
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022).
_Social determinants_ _of health._
[https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/index.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/index.html)
Campaign for Action. (2021) Issues.
[https://campaignforaction.org/issues/](https://campaignforaction.org/issues/)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)
Institute of Medicine (U.S). (2011).
_The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health._ National Library of Medicine.
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People 2030_. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
9/19/26, 3:38 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction/Th
esis Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Weak or no intro
–
duction of topic.
Purpose is
unclear/thesis is
weak or missing.
7
points
Basic introduction
that states topic but
lacks interest. Thesis
is somewhat clear
and arguable.
points
8
Proficient introduc
–
tion that is interest
–
ing and states topic.
Thesis is clear and
arguable statement
of position.
10
points
Exceptional intro
–
duction that grabs
interest of reader
and states topic;
Thesis is exception
–
ally clear, arguable,
well-developed, and
a definitive
statement.
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
| Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
| Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |
Total
/ 100
APA Format
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
APA format and
style are not
evident.
7
points
Missing APA ele
–
ments; in-text cita
–
tions, where neces
–
sary, are used but
formatted inaccu
–
rately and not
referenced.
8
points
All key elements of
an APA title page
are present; In-text
citations and a ref
–
erence page are
present with few
format errors.
Mechanics of writ
–
ing are reflective of
APA style.
points
10
A broad understand
–
ing of APA format
and style is evident.
Accurate citations
and references are
presented. No APA
errors are evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/5
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459321/View 1/5
1/5
**## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
9/19/26, 3:38 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction/Th
esis Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Weak or no intro
–
duction of topic.
Purpose is
unclear/thesis is
weak or missing.
7
points
Basic introduction
that states topic but
lacks interest. Thesis
is somewhat clear
and arguable.
points
8
Proficient introduc
–
tion that is interest
–
ing and states topic.
Thesis is clear and
arguable statement
of position.
10
points
Exceptional intro
–
duction that grabs
interest of reader
and states topic;
Thesis is exception
–
ally clear, arguable,
well-developed, and
a definitive
statement.
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
| Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
| Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |
Total
/ 100
APA Format
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
APA format and
style are not
evident.
7
points
Missing APA ele
–
ments; in-text cita
–
tions, where neces
–
sary, are used but
formatted inaccu
–
rately and not
referenced.
8
points
All key elements of
an APA title page
are present; In-text
citations and a ref
–
erence page are
present with few
format errors.
Mechanics of writ
–
ing are reflective of
APA style.
points
10
A broad understand
–
ing of APA format
and style is evident.
Accurate citations
and references are
presented. No APA
errors are evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/5
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459321/View 1/5
1/5
**## Module3Assignment.docx**
**Module 3 assignment: Health Campaign Efficacy Essay**
Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with
**at least four (4) sources in your essay.** The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount.
As addressed in this module, the social determinants of health have a significant impact on the health status of communities and populations. This information may inform healthcare providers on how to tailor interventions or develop campaigns to promote health and prevent disease. The purpose of this assignment is to critique the efficacy of a health campaign and/or program in a rural community and/or population.
This week’s assignment: use the following instructions
**(State of residence: NEW YORK)**
· Go to your state Public Health Department website and identify a campaign that has been implemented in a rural community and/or population. If you cannot identify a campaign via this method, please conduct a literature review and select a campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in a rural community and/or population. For example, you may identify a tobacco cessation campaign among rural Burmese community members.
· Once you have identified one campaign:
· Describe the purpose and goals of the campaign.
· Depict the rural community or population impacted by this campaign.
· Determine if a grant or other mechanism funded the implementation and evaluation of the campaign.
· Describe the activities embedded in the campaign and critique the feasibility and/or approach implemented in the campaign (Were there other variables that may have been included in the campaign?).
· Describe the outcome measures and critique if other outcome measures should have been included in the campaign. If so, what other outcomes would you have included?
· For example, determine if other dependable and/or tested instruments should have been included in this campaign.
· Describe if the campaign was successful and/or unsuccessful. If it was successful, what factors contributed to the success of the campaign? If it was unsuccessful, what factors contributed to the ineffectiveness of the campaign?
· Describe how the campaign was evaluated and critique how the evaluation was presented. Determine if other aspects of the campaign should have been evaluated and/or considered.
· Determine if a discussion on sustainability was included. If not, discuss how the campaign may be sustained.
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1.
**Review the rubric and the specifications** to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
The following specifications are required for this assignment:
·
**Length:** 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least
**FOUR (4) scholarly sources**.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from 2021**
**to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**Learning Materials**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. Read chapters 6 & 10. (48 pages)
**Additional Resources**
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022).
_Social determinants_ _of health._
[https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/index.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/index.html)
Campaign for Action. (2021) Issues.
[https://campaignforaction.org/issues/](https://campaignforaction.org/issues/)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)
Institute of Medicine (U.S). (2011).
_The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health._ National Library of Medicine.
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People 2030_. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
9/19/26, 3:38 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction/Th
esis Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Weak or no intro
–
duction of topic.
Purpose is
unclear/thesis is
weak or missing.
7
points
Basic introduction
that states topic but
lacks interest. Thesis
is somewhat clear
and arguable.
points
8
Proficient introduc
–
tion that is interest
–
ing and states topic.
Thesis is clear and
arguable statement
of position.
10
points
Exceptional intro
–
duction that grabs
interest of reader
and states topic;
Thesis is exception
–
ally clear, arguable,
well-developed, and
a definitive
statement.
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
| Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
| Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |
Total
/ 100
APA Format
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
APA format and
style are not
evident.
7
points
Missing APA ele
–
ments; in-text cita
–
tions, where neces
–
sary, are used but
formatted inaccu
–
rately and not
referenced.
8
points
All key elements of
an APA title page
are present; In-text
citations and a ref
–
erence page are
present with few
format errors.
Mechanics of writ
–
ing are reflective of
APA style.
points
10
A broad understand
–
ing of APA format
and style is evident.
Accurate citations
and references are
presented. No APA
errors are evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/5
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459321/View 1/5
1/5
**## Module3Assignment.docx**
**Module 3 assignment: Health Campaign Efficacy Essay**
Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with
**at least four (4) sources in your essay.** The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount.
As addressed in this module, the social determinants of health have a significant impact on the health status of communities and populations. This information may inform healthcare providers on how to tailor interventions or develop campaigns to promote health and prevent disease. The purpose of this assignment is to critique the efficacy of a health campaign and/or program in a rural community and/or population.
This week’s assignment: use the following instructions
**(State of residence: NEW YORK)**
· Go to your state Public Health Department website and identify a campaign that has been implemented in a rural community and/or population. If you cannot identify a campaign via this method, please conduct a literature review and select a campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in a rural community and/or population. For example, you may identify a tobacco cessation campaign among rural Burmese community members.
· Once you have identified one campaign:
· Describe the purpose and goals of the campaign.
· Depict the rural community or population impacted by this campaign.
· Determine if a grant or other mechanism funded the implementation and evaluation of the campaign.
· Describe the activities embedded in the campaign and critique the feasibility and/or approach implemented in the campaign (Were there other variables that may have been included in the campaign?).
· Describe the outcome measures and critique if other outcome measures should have been included in the campaign. If so, what other outcomes would you have included?
· For example, determine if other dependable and/or tested instruments should have been included in this campaign.
· Describe if the campaign was successful and/or unsuccessful. If it was successful, what factors contributed to the success of the campaign? If it was unsuccessful, what factors contributed to the ineffectiveness of the campaign?
· Describe how the campaign was evaluated and critique how the evaluation was presented. Determine if other aspects of the campaign should have been evaluated and/or considered.
· Determine if a discussion on sustainability was included. If not, discuss how the campaign may be sustained.
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1.
**Review the rubric and the specifications** to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
The following specifications are required for this assignment:
·
**Length:** 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure:** Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least
**FOUR (4) scholarly sources**.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from 2021**
**to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**Learning Materials**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. Read chapters 6 & 10. (48 pages)
**Additional Resources**
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022).
_Social determinants_ _of health._
[https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/index.html](https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/index.html)
Campaign for Action. (2021) Issues.
[https://campaignforaction.org/issues/](https://campaignforaction.org/issues/)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)
Institute of Medicine (U.S). (2011).
_The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health._ National Library of Medicine.
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209880/)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People 2030_. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module3Assignment-RUBRIC.docx**
9/19/26, 3:38 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 – DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care – Aspen University Classroom
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1
Criteria
**Does Not Meet 0%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Introduction/Th
esis Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Weak or no intro
–
duction of topic.
Purpose is
unclear/thesis is
weak or missing.
7
points
Basic introduction
that states topic but
lacks interest. Thesis
is somewhat clear
and arguable.
points
8
Proficient introduc
–
tion that is interest
–
ing and states topic.
Thesis is clear and
arguable statement
of position.
10
points
Exceptional intro
–
duction that grabs
interest of reader
and states topic;
Thesis is exception
–
ally clear, arguable,
well-developed, and
a definitive
statement.
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Information or<br>Evidence<br>Weight: 25% | 0 points<br>Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. Information has weak or no connection to the thesis. | 17.5 points<br>Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Indicates a limited variety of sources. | 20 points<br>Information relates to the main topic. Paper is researched in sufficient detail and from a variety of sources. All necessary content is included. | 25 points<br>Paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, and accurate. Information clearly relates to the thesis. Appropriate content is covered in depth without being redundant. | / 25 |
| Support of<br>Thesis/Analysis<br>Weight: 20% | 0 points<br>Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lacks analysis. | 14 points<br>Some connections have been made between evidence and thesis, though they may be tenuous. Minimal analysis is evident, but may not provide needed support for thesis. | 16 points<br>Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Analysis sufficiently supports thesis. | 20 points<br>Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis is evident. | / 20 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Organization/<br>Development of Thesis Weight:<br>15% | 0 points<br>Lacks development of ideas with weak or no transitions between and within paragraphs. | 10.5 points<br>Somewhat clear development, though perhaps illogical, with basic transitions between and within paragraphs. | 12 points<br>Clear and logical order that supports thesis with appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs. | 15 points<br>Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within paragraphs. | / 15 |
| Conclusion<br>Weight: 5% | 0 points<br>Lacks a summary of topic. Conclusions missing or irrelevant. | 3.5 points<br>Basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas. Inappropriately introduces new information. | 4 points<br>Good summary of<br>topic with credible concluding ideas. Introduces no new information. | 5 points<br>Excellent summary of topic with succinct and precise concluding ideas that impact reader. | / 5 |
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quality of<br>Written<br>Communication<br>Weight: 15% | 0 points<br>Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | 10.5 points<br>Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.<br>Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | 12 points<br>Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word<br>choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | 15 points<br>Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | / 15 |
Total
/ 100
APA Format
Weight: 10%
/ 10
0
points
APA format and
style are not
evident.
7
points
Missing APA ele
–
ments; in-text cita
–
tions, where neces
–
sary, are used but
formatted inaccu
–
rately and not
referenced.
8
points
All key elements of
an APA title page
are present; In-text
citations and a ref
–
erence page are
present with few
format errors.
Mechanics of writ
–
ing are reflective of
APA style.
points
10
A broad understand
–
ing of APA format
and style is evident.
Accurate citations
and references are
presented. No APA
errors are evident.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/5
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459321/View 1/5
1/5
Leave a Reply