[Solved] assitant needed mus Kenniqua

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

please see attachment

– a month ago

**files (1)**

– ## ConcertReportRubricFALL2025-MOURA1stBi-term.docx

**## ConcertReportRubricFALL2025-MOURA1stBi-term.docx**

**MUS 125-04**
**Understanding Music Online – FALL 25 J.MOURA**

**Concert Report Rubric (1st Bi-term)**

**Requirements:** In order to receive full credit on each report, students must do the following:

·
**Attend** a CU concert and turn in their attendance slip at the end of the performance. Without proof of attendance, no credit will be given for the report.

***Online students are required to watch CU’s School of Music concert. Due on Week 5**

Link:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anOXON5-4so](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anOXON5-4so)

1st Bi-term:
**School of Music Faculty Showcase**

2nd Bi-term:
**School of Music Faculty Showcase**

·
**Write** a 1-2-page, double spaced report using Times New Roman, size 12 font and standard margins.

•
**Report should include**:

1. What pieces were performed (title & composer)

2. What ensemble performed, where, and when the concert took place

3. What you liked/disliked about the concert. You must say
**_WHY_** you did or didn’t like something by referencing music vocabulary terms.

4.
**_Most Importantly_** tell me what you observed using vocabulary terms,
_key terms_, from class and descriptive adjectives. What instruments had solos? What type of texture was there? Who had the melody? Harmony? Was the music tonal, atonal? etc.
**The more detailed the better (see chart on 2nd page).**

·
**TURN IN YOUR PAPER ELECTRONICALLY in Moodle (Word Documents ONLY)**

· See Syllabus for concert report due dates. All reports are due by 11:59pm EST on their due date.

· It is recommended that you turn in concert reports closer to the date that you attended the concert. This will help you remember important details and it will ensure that the instructor has received your attendance slip.

·
**Online students: Turn in your report by Sunday Midnight of week 5. Send it to Jmmoura@campbellsville.edu.**

**Reports will be graded based on the chart below:**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Content Grading Scale** | |
| **Structure**<br>(grammar, scholarly writing, spelling, formatting)<br>**10% of Report Grade**<br>**Descriptive Vocabulary**<br>(musical terms & your own individual descriptive language; Includes titles/ composers of pieces, <br>ensemble, when/where of <br>concert etc.) <br>**40% of Report Grade**<br>**Musical Content**<br>(Elements of theory: harmony, melody, rhythm, <br>instrumentation, orchestration, tempo, dynamics)<br>**40% of Report Grade**<br>**Point of View**<br>(personal opinion-what did you like/dislike and WHY <br>using musical terms) <br>**10% of Report Grade** | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Poor**<br>The essay has no structure, there are more than 12 grammatical /spelling errors, the references are inaccurate.<br>Formatting is incorrect. | **Fair**<br>The essay has an unclear structure, there are 12 or less grammatical/spelling errors, at least half of the references to terms are inaccurate. <br>Formatting is incorrect. | **Good**<br>The essay has a notable structure (opening, body, closing), there are 8 or less grammatical/spelling errors, the references to terms are mostly accurate. <br>Formatting is correct. | | **Excellent**<br>The essay has a clear and cohesive structure (opening, body, closing), there are 5 or less grammatical/spelling errors, the references to terms are totally accurate. <br>Formatting is correct. |
| | **Poor**<br>The essay correctly uses less than 3 musical terms and does not use individual descriptive language. It does not include titles/composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/ where the concert was performed. | | | |
| — | — |
| **Fair**<br>The essay correctly uses at less than 5 new musical terms as well as some individual descriptive language. It does not include titles/composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/ where the concert was performed. | **Good**<br>The essay correctly uses at least 6 new musical terms as well as fairly significant amounts of individual descriptive language. It includes title/composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/where the concert was performed. |

. | **Excellent**<br>The essay correctly uses 8 or more accurate musical terms as well as significant amounts of individual descriptive language. It includes titles/ composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/where the concert was performed. |
| | **Poor**<br>The essay includes content on <br>2 or less of the 7 listed elements of theory, the content is mostly incorrect. | **Fair**<br>The essay includes content on less than 3 of the 7 listed elements of theory; the content is half correct. | **Good**<br>The essay includes content on 4 of the 7 listed elements of theory, the content is mostly correct. | **Excellent**<br>The essay includes content on 5 of the 7 listed elements of theory, the content is mostly correct. |
| | **Poor**<br>The essay has no point of view and makes no attempt at issuing an opinion. If an opinion is stated about liking/ disliking a piece, no musical terms are referenced. | **Fair**<br>The essay has a point of view that is unsupported by data/ examples within the paper. If an opinion is stated about liking/disliking a piece, no musical terms are referenced. | **Good**<br>The essay has a point of view which is mostly supported by data/examples within the paper and it references musical terms. | **Excellent**<br>The essay has a clear and original point of view that is supported by data/examples within the paper and it references musical terms. |

**## ConcertReportRubricFALL2025-MOURA1stBi-term.docx**

**MUS 125-04**
**Understanding Music Online – FALL 25 J.MOURA**

**Concert Report Rubric (1st Bi-term)**

**Requirements:** In order to receive full credit on each report, students must do the following:

·
**Attend** a CU concert and turn in their attendance slip at the end of the performance. Without proof of attendance, no credit will be given for the report.

***Online students are required to watch CU’s School of Music concert. Due on Week 5**

Link:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anOXON5-4so](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anOXON5-4so)

1st Bi-term:
**School of Music Faculty Showcase**

2nd Bi-term:
**School of Music Faculty Showcase**

·
**Write** a 1-2-page, double spaced report using Times New Roman, size 12 font and standard margins.

•
**Report should include**:

1. What pieces were performed (title & composer)

2. What ensemble performed, where, and when the concert took place

3. What you liked/disliked about the concert. You must say
**_WHY_** you did or didn’t like something by referencing music vocabulary terms.

4.
**_Most Importantly_** tell me what you observed using vocabulary terms,
_key terms_, from class and descriptive adjectives. What instruments had solos? What type of texture was there? Who had the melody? Harmony? Was the music tonal, atonal? etc.
**The more detailed the better (see chart on 2nd page).**

·
**TURN IN YOUR PAPER ELECTRONICALLY in Moodle (Word Documents ONLY)**

· See Syllabus for concert report due dates. All reports are due by 11:59pm EST on their due date.

· It is recommended that you turn in concert reports closer to the date that you attended the concert. This will help you remember important details and it will ensure that the instructor has received your attendance slip.

·
**Online students: Turn in your report by Sunday Midnight of week 5. Send it to Jmmoura@campbellsville.edu.**

**Reports will be graded based on the chart below:**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Content Grading Scale** | |
| **Structure**<br>(grammar, scholarly writing, spelling, formatting)<br>**10% of Report Grade**<br>**Descriptive Vocabulary**<br>(musical terms & your own individual descriptive language; Includes titles/ composers of pieces, <br>ensemble, when/where of <br>concert etc.) <br>**40% of Report Grade**<br>**Musical Content**<br>(Elements of theory: harmony, melody, rhythm, <br>instrumentation, orchestration, tempo, dynamics)<br>**40% of Report Grade**<br>**Point of View**<br>(personal opinion-what did you like/dislike and WHY <br>using musical terms) <br>**10% of Report Grade** | | | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Poor**<br>The essay has no structure, there are more than 12 grammatical /spelling errors, the references are inaccurate.<br>Formatting is incorrect. | **Fair**<br>The essay has an unclear structure, there are 12 or less grammatical/spelling errors, at least half of the references to terms are inaccurate. <br>Formatting is incorrect. | **Good**<br>The essay has a notable structure (opening, body, closing), there are 8 or less grammatical/spelling errors, the references to terms are mostly accurate. <br>Formatting is correct. | | **Excellent**<br>The essay has a clear and cohesive structure (opening, body, closing), there are 5 or less grammatical/spelling errors, the references to terms are totally accurate. <br>Formatting is correct. |
| | **Poor**<br>The essay correctly uses less than 3 musical terms and does not use individual descriptive language. It does not include titles/composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/ where the concert was performed. | | | |
| — | — |
| **Fair**<br>The essay correctly uses at less than 5 new musical terms as well as some individual descriptive language. It does not include titles/composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/ where the concert was performed. | **Good**<br>The essay correctly uses at least 6 new musical terms as well as fairly significant amounts of individual descriptive language. It includes title/composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/where the concert was performed. |

. | **Excellent**<br>The essay correctly uses 8 or more accurate musical terms as well as significant amounts of individual descriptive language. It includes titles/ composers of pieces, name of the ensemble, when/where the concert was performed. |
| | **Poor**<br>The essay includes content on <br>2 or less of the 7 listed elements of theory, the content is mostly incorrect. | **Fair**<br>The essay includes content on less than 3 of the 7 listed elements of theory; the content is half correct. | **Good**<br>The essay includes content on 4 of the 7 listed elements of theory, the content is mostly correct. | **Excellent**<br>The essay includes content on 5 of the 7 listed elements of theory, the content is mostly correct. |
| | **Poor**<br>The essay has no point of view and makes no attempt at issuing an opinion. If an opinion is stated about liking/ disliking a piece, no musical terms are referenced. | **Fair**<br>The essay has a point of view that is unsupported by data/ examples within the paper. If an opinion is stated about liking/disliking a piece, no musical terms are referenced. | **Good**<br>The essay has a point of view which is mostly supported by data/examples within the paper and it references musical terms. | **Excellent**<br>The essay has a clear and original point of view that is supported by data/examples within the paper and it references musical terms. |