Executive Solution Overview
Board of Nursing or Nursing Association Advisory Board, – a month ago **files (2)** – ## Module_4_JournalQuestion.docx – ## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx **## Module_4_JournalQuestion.docx** **Journal Question:** As addressed in the readings, there is the capacity for federal and state-level poli…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Board of Nursing or Nursing Association Advisory Board,
– a month ago
**files (2)**
– ## Module_4_JournalQuestion.docx
– ## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx
**## Module_4_JournalQuestion.docx**
**Journal Question:**
As addressed in the readings, there is the capacity for federal and state-level policymaking to drive and incentivize new and innovative population health efforts and strategies. If you were asked to address a Board of Nursing or Nursing Association Advisory Board, how would you build your case and arguments towards your proposed population health effort or strategy? What information would you supply the Board to understand and support your proposed population health effort or strategy? (Please identify a population health effort or strategy based on the healthcare, economic, and/or social needs of your state of residence).
**Journal Response Expectations**
**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**
**Learning Materials**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 13. (24 pages)
**Additional Resources**
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. (2022).
_AANP Advocacy:_
_Championing the NP Role and Amplifying the NP Voice_.
[https://www.aanp.org/advocacy](https://www.aanp.org/advocacy)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022).
_Resources for writing_
_briefs._ [https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/policy-resources-trainings/writing-briefs.html](https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/policy-resources-trainings/writing-briefs.html)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)
Health Affairs. (2022).
_Health Policy Briefs_.
[https://www.healthaffairs.org/briefs](https://www.healthaffairs.org/briefs)
Jaffe, S. (2009). Health policy brief: key issues in health reform.
_Health_
_Affairs_.
[https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20090820.922429](https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20090820.922429)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_
_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**
Graduate Journal Rubric v1. Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Claim/Quali
ty of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 8
Developme
nt/Connecti
on Weight:
%
40
/ 8
0
points
**(0**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing or inac
–
curate. Answer
is inaccurate
and does not
address the
prompt.
points
2.5
**pts**
**(5.6**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing key el
–
ements.
Answer is par
–
tially inaccu
–
rate and misses
elements in the
prompt. Claims
are lacking in
–
formation to
be fully
thought out.
points
6.4
**(6.4**
**)**
**pts**
Response to
quiz question is
appropriate
and accurate.
Answer is ap
–
propriate and
responses to
the prompt.
Claims are
appropriate.
8
points
**(8**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
thorough and
detailed.
Answer is clear
and concise
and responses
to all aspects
of the prompt.
Claims are jus
–
tified and
plausible.
0
points
**pts**
**)**
**(0**
Connections
are either miss
–
ing or inaccu
–
rate in the
discussion.
5.6
points
**(5.6**
**pts**
**)**
Connections
are included by
missing key in
–
formation in
the discussion.
points
6.4
**)**
**pts**
**(6.4**
Connections
are appropri
–
ately and accu
–
rately
discussed.
8
points
**)**
**pts**
**(8**
Connections
are insightful,
reflective, and
completely
discussed.
Total
/ 20
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Writing &
Mechanics
Weight:
%
20
/ 4
0
points
**)**
**pts**
**(0**
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given
purpose.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and
punctuation.
2.8
points
**pts**
**)**
**(2.8**
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
3.2
**(3.2**
**pts**
**)**
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical, typo
–
graphical, are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
points
4
**pts**
**(4**
**)**
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical, ty
–
pographical,
errors.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
14
points minimum
**Level 3**
16
points minimum
**Level 4**
20
points minimum
2/2
**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**
Graduate Journal Rubric v1. Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Claim/Quali
ty of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 8
Developme
nt/Connecti
on Weight:
%
40
/ 8
0
points
**(0**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing or inac
–
curate. Answer
is inaccurate
and does not
address the
prompt.
points
2.5
**pts**
**(5.6**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing key el
–
ements.
Answer is par
–
tially inaccu
–
rate and misses
elements in the
prompt. Claims
are lacking in
–
formation to
be fully
thought out.
points
6.4
**(6.4**
**)**
**pts**
Response to
quiz question is
appropriate
and accurate.
Answer is ap
–
propriate and
responses to
the prompt.
Claims are
appropriate.
8
points
**(8**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
thorough and
detailed.
Answer is clear
and concise
and responses
to all aspects
of the prompt.
Claims are jus
–
tified and
plausible.
0
points
**pts**
**)**
**(0**
Connections
are either miss
–
ing or inaccu
–
rate in the
discussion.
5.6
points
**(5.6**
**pts**
**)**
Connections
are included by
missing key in
–
formation in
the discussion.
points
6.4
**)**
**pts**
**(6.4**
Connections
are appropri
–
ately and accu
–
rately
discussed.
8
points
**)**
**pts**
**(8**
Connections
are insightful,
reflective, and
completely
discussed.
Total
/ 20
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Writing &
Mechanics
Weight:
%
20
/ 4
0
points
**)**
**pts**
**(0**
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given
purpose.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and
punctuation.
2.8
points
**pts**
**)**
**(2.8**
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
3.2
**(3.2**
**pts**
**)**
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical, typo
–
graphical, are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
points
4
**pts**
**(4**
**)**
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical, ty
–
pographical,
errors.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
14
points minimum
**Level 3**
16
points minimum
**Level 4**
20
points minimum
2/2
**## Module_4_JournalQuestion.docx**
**Journal Question:**
As addressed in the readings, there is the capacity for federal and state-level policymaking to drive and incentivize new and innovative population health efforts and strategies. If you were asked to address a Board of Nursing or Nursing Association Advisory Board, how would you build your case and arguments towards your proposed population health effort or strategy? What information would you supply the Board to understand and support your proposed population health effort or strategy? (Please identify a population health effort or strategy based on the healthcare, economic, and/or social needs of your state of residence).
**Journal Response Expectations**
**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**
**Learning Materials**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 13. (24 pages)
**Additional Resources**
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. (2022).
_AANP Advocacy:_
_Championing the NP Role and Amplifying the NP Voice_.
[https://www.aanp.org/advocacy](https://www.aanp.org/advocacy)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022).
_Resources for writing_
_briefs._ [https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/policy-resources-trainings/writing-briefs.html](https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/policy-resources-trainings/writing-briefs.html)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)
Health Affairs. (2022).
_Health Policy Briefs_.
[https://www.healthaffairs.org/briefs](https://www.healthaffairs.org/briefs)
Jaffe, S. (2009). Health policy brief: key issues in health reform.
_Health_
_Affairs_.
[https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20090820.922429](https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20090820.922429)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_
_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**
Graduate Journal Rubric v1. Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Claim/Quali
ty of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 8
Developme
nt/Connecti
on Weight:
%
40
/ 8
0
points
**(0**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing or inac
–
curate. Answer
is inaccurate
and does not
address the
prompt.
points
2.5
**pts**
**(5.6**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing key el
–
ements.
Answer is par
–
tially inaccu
–
rate and misses
elements in the
prompt. Claims
are lacking in
–
formation to
be fully
thought out.
points
6.4
**(6.4**
**)**
**pts**
Response to
quiz question is
appropriate
and accurate.
Answer is ap
–
propriate and
responses to
the prompt.
Claims are
appropriate.
8
points
**(8**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
thorough and
detailed.
Answer is clear
and concise
and responses
to all aspects
of the prompt.
Claims are jus
–
tified and
plausible.
0
points
**pts**
**)**
**(0**
Connections
are either miss
–
ing or inaccu
–
rate in the
discussion.
5.6
points
**(5.6**
**pts**
**)**
Connections
are included by
missing key in
–
formation in
the discussion.
points
6.4
**)**
**pts**
**(6.4**
Connections
are appropri
–
ately and accu
–
rately
discussed.
8
points
**)**
**pts**
**(8**
Connections
are insightful,
reflective, and
completely
discussed.
Total
/ 20
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Writing &
Mechanics
Weight:
%
20
/ 4
0
points
**)**
**pts**
**(0**
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given
purpose.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and
punctuation.
2.8
points
**pts**
**)**
**(2.8**
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
3.2
**(3.2**
**pts**
**)**
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical, typo
–
graphical, are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
points
4
**pts**
**(4**
**)**
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical, ty
–
pographical,
errors.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
14
points minimum
**Level 3**
16
points minimum
**Level 4**
20
points minimum
2/2
**## Module_4_JournalQuestion.docx**
**Journal Question:**
As addressed in the readings, there is the capacity for federal and state-level policymaking to drive and incentivize new and innovative population health efforts and strategies. If you were asked to address a Board of Nursing or Nursing Association Advisory Board, how would you build your case and arguments towards your proposed population health effort or strategy? What information would you supply the Board to understand and support your proposed population health effort or strategy? (Please identify a population health effort or strategy based on the healthcare, economic, and/or social needs of your state of residence).
**Journal Response Expectations**
**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**
**Learning Materials**
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 13. (24 pages)
**Additional Resources**
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. (2022).
_AANP Advocacy:_
_Championing the NP Role and Amplifying the NP Voice_.
[https://www.aanp.org/advocacy](https://www.aanp.org/advocacy)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022).
_Resources for writing_
_briefs._ [https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/policy-resources-trainings/writing-briefs.html](https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/policy-resources-trainings/writing-briefs.html)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)
Health Affairs. (2022).
_Health Policy Briefs_.
[https://www.healthaffairs.org/briefs](https://www.healthaffairs.org/briefs)
Jaffe, S. (2009). Health policy brief: key issues in health reform.
_Health_
_Affairs_.
[https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20090820.922429](https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20090820.922429)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_
_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)
**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**
Graduate Journal Rubric v1. Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Claim/Quali
ty of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 8
Developme
nt/Connecti
on Weight:
%
40
/ 8
0
points
**(0**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing or inac
–
curate. Answer
is inaccurate
and does not
address the
prompt.
points
2.5
**pts**
**(5.6**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
missing key el
–
ements.
Answer is par
–
tially inaccu
–
rate and misses
elements in the
prompt. Claims
are lacking in
–
formation to
be fully
thought out.
points
6.4
**(6.4**
**)**
**pts**
Response to
quiz question is
appropriate
and accurate.
Answer is ap
–
propriate and
responses to
the prompt.
Claims are
appropriate.
8
points
**(8**
**pts**
**)**
Response to
quiz question is
thorough and
detailed.
Answer is clear
and concise
and responses
to all aspects
of the prompt.
Claims are jus
–
tified and
plausible.
0
points
**pts**
**)**
**(0**
Connections
are either miss
–
ing or inaccu
–
rate in the
discussion.
5.6
points
**(5.6**
**pts**
**)**
Connections
are included by
missing key in
–
formation in
the discussion.
points
6.4
**)**
**pts**
**(6.4**
Connections
are appropri
–
ately and accu
–
rately
discussed.
8
points
**)**
**pts**
**(8**
Connections
are insightful,
reflective, and
completely
discussed.
Total
/ 20
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**Expectations**
**Approaches**
**Expectations**
**Meets**
**Expectations**
**Exceeds**
**Expectations**
**Criterion Score**
Writing &
Mechanics
Weight:
%
20
/ 4
0
points
**)**
**pts**
**(0**
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given
purpose.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and
punctuation.
2.8
points
**pts**
**)**
**(2.8**
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
3.2
**(3.2**
**pts**
**)**
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical, typo
–
graphical, are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
points
4
**pts**
**(4**
**)**
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical, ty
–
pographical,
errors.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
14
points minimum
**Level 3**
16
points minimum
**Level 4**
20
points minimum
2/2
Leave a Reply