Executive Solution Overview
Attached – ## 1.docx – ## rubric.docx **## 1.docx** DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE. [Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and respons…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Attached
– ## 1.docx
– ## rubric.docx
**## 1.docx**
DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE.
[Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position, and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion will focus on student success and the practices that promote success such as UDL. These practices can be reflective of what classrooms , workplace and home settings. Some of the questions: How do we define success? How do we create an environment that will be conducive for success? What practices encourage students and promote success and discourage students from succeeding? Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts (it can be two posts on the same subject or two independent posts) and 2 replies (it can be 2 replies to the same person or to two different people). Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment.
**## rubric.docx**
**General Rubric For All Assignments**
This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Criteria Ratings** |
| | | | | |
| **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
| | | | | |
**## rubric.docx**
**General Rubric For All Assignments**
This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Criteria Ratings** |
| | | | | |
| **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
| | | | | |
**## 1.docx**
DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE.
[Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position, and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion will focus on student success and the practices that promote success such as UDL. These practices can be reflective of what classrooms , workplace and home settings. Some of the questions: How do we define success? How do we create an environment that will be conducive for success? What practices encourage students and promote success and discourage students from succeeding? Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts (it can be two posts on the same subject or two independent posts) and 2 replies (it can be 2 replies to the same person or to two different people). Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment.
**## rubric.docx**
**General Rubric For All Assignments**
This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Criteria Ratings** |
| | | | | |
| **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
| | | | | |
**## 1.docx**
DO NOT USE CHAT GPT OR ANY OTHER THAT PLATAFORM THAT CAN COMPROMISE YOUR GRADE.
[Discussion 1](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/63893/discussion_topics/802529) **-** This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position, and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion will focus on student success and the practices that promote success such as UDL. These practices can be reflective of what classrooms , workplace and home settings. Some of the questions: How do we define success? How do we create an environment that will be conducive for success? What practices encourage students and promote success and discourage students from succeeding? Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts (it can be two posts on the same subject or two independent posts) and 2 replies (it can be 2 replies to the same person or to two different people). Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment.
**## rubric.docx**
**General Rubric For All Assignments**
This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| | **Criteria Ratings** |
| | | | | |
| **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
| | | | | |
| **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
| | | | | |
– 1
– 2
Leave a Reply