[Solved] Law – Criminal Wk 5 – Signature Assignment: Sentencing Proposal

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

See attached

– 2 years ago

**files (1)**

– ## Wk5.pdf

**## Wk5.pdf**

Wk 5 – Signature Assignment: Sentencing Proposal

After a defendant receives a guilty verdict, there is more work to be done. This assignment
allows you to explore sentencing options as you continue to think about the case your
learning team worked on in Week 3. Read the ruling carefully and return to the case
specifics in Week 3 if you need a refresher. Refer to How Courts Work: Steps in a Trial: Plea
Bargaining from the American Bar Association website as you work on this assignment.

The ruling for State v. Stu Dents is in and the defendant, your law firm’s client, was found
guilty. As a paralegal, your task now is to help the attorney consider the sentencing options
for the client and determine what to propose to the court.

Read the Ruling on State v. Stu Dents. Use this information as the basis for your sentencing
proposal.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word sentencing proposal in which you address the following:

• Formulate 2 distinct sentencing arguments. Make one proposal from the
prosecution viewpoint, and one from the defense viewpoint.

• Identify the desired outcome of each punishment. Is a plea bargain a consideration?
If so, what is that desired outcome?

• Identify alternative and intermediate sanctions.

• Explain how the Eighth Amendment influences the outcomes of this case.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document attached to the assignment tab.

[https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/)

[https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/)

[https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_v_stu_dents.docx](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_v_stu_dents.docx)

[https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_vs_stu_dents.docx](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_vs_stu_dents.docx)

**## Wk5.pdf**

Wk 5 – Signature Assignment: Sentencing Proposal

After a defendant receives a guilty verdict, there is more work to be done. This assignment
allows you to explore sentencing options as you continue to think about the case your
learning team worked on in Week 3. Read the ruling carefully and return to the case
specifics in Week 3 if you need a refresher. Refer to How Courts Work: Steps in a Trial: Plea
Bargaining from the American Bar Association website as you work on this assignment.

The ruling for State v. Stu Dents is in and the defendant, your law firm’s client, was found
guilty. As a paralegal, your task now is to help the attorney consider the sentencing options
for the client and determine what to propose to the court.

Read the Ruling on State v. Stu Dents. Use this information as the basis for your sentencing
proposal.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word sentencing proposal in which you address the following:

• Formulate 2 distinct sentencing arguments. Make one proposal from the
prosecution viewpoint, and one from the defense viewpoint.

• Identify the desired outcome of each punishment. Is a plea bargain a consideration?
If so, what is that desired outcome?

• Identify alternative and intermediate sanctions.

• Explain how the Eighth Amendment influences the outcomes of this case.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document attached to the assignment tab.

[https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/)

[https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/pleabargaining/)

[https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_v_stu_dents.docx](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_v_stu_dents.docx)

[https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_vs_stu_dents.docx](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/CJA305v4/cja305_v4_wk5_ruling_on_state_vs_stu_dents.docx)